@@ys-50989 good performance, no heating, I haven't face any issue but 65w is odd, can be use only one port to charge laptops, if you use another port the charging speed decreased, atleast 100W is a must, my thought
Thanks for your video!! You always provide the info no one else does. I bought the Anker A2669 some weeks before I got to know your channel. Although it works perfectly with all my devices and looks like a quality product, now I'm kinda regretting my purchase. It looks like a step back from the A2668 in terms of efficiency. I've had always great experience with Anker products, but in this particular case, I'm a bit disappointed with the brand.
If it works that is a good and hopefully it keeps working for a long time. The efficiency is close, splitting hairs on the differences really. Anker does tend to release products on both ends of the spectrum each time. In this case really average with the competition.
@@AllThingsOnePlaceAfter my initial disappointment with this charger, I've come to view it in a more positive way. This new version does support 5 amps in PPS mode (IIRC, the previous version only supported up to 3 amps). And the power distribution between the different outputs is more flexible in the new version. All in all, I no longer see this adapter to be a bad purchase. It fills my needs for a smartphone charger that supports PPS mode. And it's also great as a 65W charger for a laptop I only use from time to time.
Great video , currently i just lost my anker 737, usually use to charge my Thinkpad but I have some issue because it need some time to make it normal charge because it's voltage maybe,now im looking for the replacement between anker a2669 and anker735, I do compare between them ,it says that a2669 can simultaneously charge 2 port in 65 watt but not with anker 735 ,is is right, i still dont get how its efficiency effect in daily use ,is it to the battery life or how, please give the recommendation between a668 67 and 735 or maybe other ugreen thanks for your reply
In terms of efficiency, yeah it seems like that. The power distribution between the USB-C ports is more flexible with this one though. And now it also has the 12-V PD output, that was typically lacking in Anker chargers. But if efficiency is very important to you, yeah, it looks like a step back. Edit: mistype.
@@ethereal026 I bought the 735 with UK plug for £35, and rarely need to charge really quickly. I’ll stick with this for the time being but was hoping for more efficient lower wattage chargers by now.
To add another angle to "100W is more power efficient and does more"(also just watched the 735/737/747 review where you suggest skipping all 65W PA): I bought initially Anker 120W(737), mostly for my laptop but later bought Anker's 67W(A2669) and switched to that because 120W was almost overheating the battery while 67W charges it plenty fast without heating the battery at all(at least the surface of the laptop does not change temps, it seems) - in my calculation, the cost of the laptop(degrading the battery - I had a phone die on me fast because of fast charging overheating the battery) is significantly higher than a few W I might be losing.
That is an angle, but it is also up to the device to decide how fast to charge. The power adapter is just the supply. There is always the option of using a 60W rated USB cable to force a slower charge with a more efficient adapter. For phones, yeah, it's ridiculous, they're forcing charging speeds that small batteries can't handle and it may work for a few demos but in the long run the batteries do not last. Samsung has a toggle for those faster charging modes for a reason. The power adapter doesn't force anything on the device though. So, if a laptop maker decides to allow fast charging they hopefully did the work to make sure the battery and electronics can handle that.
I just wanted and power adapter to be a small as possible and able charge my 60w laptop and smart phone, so I picked the 67 watt before I had seen your review.
Some devices use 12V. I think it's most useful to use one of these adapters as a replacement for a couple wall warts since a lot of those end up being 12V.
@@brandonmorris3746basically everything low power with those barrel connectors, fiber optic devices(NT) modems, routere, tv boxes, android tv boxes, toothbrush chargers, etc
haha, yeah, I'm avoiding that one. It looks like it's a 140W max single port adapter with an extra 100W tacked on but yeah eventually it'll be on. No rush on that one.
In that, I subbed and think your videos are awesome. I don't understand most of the ripple points but I find it very interesting. I have about 40tabs open of your videos watching this one lol.
Yeah, people seem to binge there way though once they find it. People end up reminding me of things from previous videos like, oh yeah, I guess I did say that, ha.
Yeah, you can squeeze a few more percent out, you really have to overbuild to get more though. Switch topologies, spend an unreal amount of time and money optimizing the transformer.
I would have loved to see ugreen included in these reviews they are kinda populair in europe and they seem good for the price they would be nice to be compared to
UGREEN has lots of videos on the channel. I do these kind of mini comparisons with a few different, untested, adapters. There's no particular rhyme or reason.
@@AllThingsOnePlace I’m new to your channel I will check them out, I’m currently looking for a dual usb c charger since the iPhone is usb c and I have to keep changing the cable to charge my phone and airpods max, these videos help allot
I was really hoping the 67 watt Anker would at least have PFC seeing as it's over the "65W" limit most people claim is the new legal limit(even though I haven't seen any paperwork saying it changed from 75w) but I was at least hoping brand new series, expensive new tech. Sad but not surprising
McDodo earns packaging points back because the main outer box is a standard size they use for 10-15 different bricks. the inner plastic molding is just swapped out. So at least they aren't designing custom packaging for each.. they probably can't afford to lol.
Hello, what do you think is a better option in order to charge Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Watch 5Pro in the same time? Anker Prime 67w or the Ugreen Nexode pro 65w? Thanks and keep going with the videos!!
Can you help me please I already ordered anker 735 65 w After that I came across anker 335 67 wat comes with cable 5A which I don't have I only have cable c that come with my s22u in box Should I cancel my 735 and buy the 335 because of the cable 5A ????? They are almost the same price on amazon right now
I love your technical reviews, already subscribed. Any video comparing *the best* dual USB-C models or planning to do one? I'm about to travel and got interested in which could give the best value. Cheers!
Thanks! I don't have any specific plans for that style, I've looked at several in various videos. There's little reasoning to the adapters I pick, just pick some and test them. I do have some more multiport lower wattage adapters to test though. As far as what is the best one so far monoprice 42620 is good if you only need to charge phones and lower powered devices. The Insignia has a few less output options but it can charge 20V devices as a bonus over the monoprice, then the mcdodo 40W dual port has lots of charging modes so probably the most capable but it is a little less efficient. The apple 35W ones aren't amazing and very expensive.
@@AllThingsOnePlace Please don't give up. Let's hope that this is just a delivery problem of a new product and not an attempt to avoid a not so good test result.
How do you feel about Mokin bricks? I've been using their 3-port 65w for a month now and I am impressed. I can't seem to find any of them on your channel even though lots of them sell on Amazon. I found them on prime day. Got the brick shipped for $16.
Wow, yeah, that's really inexpensive. I haven't looked at them, but I'm gonna check it out. It does look unique too so I don't think it's just another clone.
Spigen tried to spoof their way into the chart with that "quality power" sticker! Tech is getting so cheap that there isn't much difference between them. The only thing I don't really like is Anker always leaning towards the low side when it comes to DC voltage. Still looking forward for more power banks, those aren't tested accurately on the internet and your video format is the best I've found.
Yeah, I think their claim is the DC output is perfectly stable, this was the worst of the bunch. The format is slowly evolving hopefully will get a little better over time although not much has changed this year.
@@AllThingsOnePlacedo you think it's possible that you just had a defective unit? It would’ve been great if you tested 2 identical devices to get an average
@@Mr_nah Yeah, it is a possibility, but the probability is very low. I have tested more than one of several samples and found that the data isn't any different as long as the unit is functional. If it doesn't work then things get interesting. I did that too.
65w cube is my go to in term of size and capability, especially for travel. 100w 3rd party GaN isn't much different in size compared to older si adaptor. If anything the port and cable became more of a mess unless you specifically require power and ports (ie photo and videography) in which case desktop style power adapter is a better option anyway
It is fine. It is just so close the dimensions and weight of the 100W, which is better, but also more expensive that I gave it decreased recommendation. But it is a perfectly safe charger to use with your apple devices.
The Anker 100 Watt 317 model is available for under 30.00, but is this really the best quality for under 30.00 out there in this 100 Watt Range the author of the videos I feel gives this Anker model mixed reviews about it:
love your channel, but i have 1 question. when you mention the idle power consumption i can't help but wonder if that value would be different for 230V 50Hz outlets, since you seem to be testing it on 120V 60Hz or does it make no difference?
Which one should you choose between Anker 735 Charger (Nano II 65W) and Anker 735 Charger (GaNPrime 65W) and Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (3 Ports)?
The 100W prime charger, ha. Nano II and the GaNPrime are both about equal. If I needed more ports the GanPrime is probably the choice for most people due to that. I have taken the Nano II several times because in the field I usually dedicate one port to one device. So, last time I used it, it was directly powering a camera for a whole day but my use case may not align with others.
Yeah, these mostly all will work there but yeah I don't have any with the plug style as native. I'm slowly working on adding some other ones in. I have a few EU ones I got at Saturn.
I'm getting the Anker 735 and not the Anker 67 because it is much cheaper. I really need the three ports and the 100 w Baseus you said was more efficient is to big to carry on a bag but maybe I will buy that later for my desk charge all charger for all devices including my laptop. I was wondering if the AC leakage on the Anker 735 and the 67 w ok since they have both safety listing?
Anker in both teardowns and testing I have done, I haven't tested all of them or torn down all of them by any means, generally does good in leakage tests.
Kind of take your pick, there are plenty of safe options on the market. I generally stay away from 65W devices. The Amazon Basics 65W is okay, but it's only one port. As you say more, damage is inevitable in batteries, every charge and discharge cycle causes the battery to degrade a little. The charger being sized appropriately and the device only using what it needs while managing temperatures is what makes the battery last longer. I personally like a 20 - 30 W charger like the UGREEN 30W Nexode, or the Google 30W charger, Belkin is good too...
Could you explain how the Anker “active shield 2.0” works? I have looked on the Anker website and on the Amazon listing, but there are no real technical details or parameters on it. I was looking for find out if it monitors the device battery temperature ? Under what protocol would the device battery temperature send that information to the charger? Or does it only monitor the temperature of the charging brick itself and use that as the reference temperature? I have learned a lot from you and any input you have on this would be appreciated!
Yeah, just from a power electronics perspective and teardowns I've seen, it use a separate microcontroller to monitor internal temperatures. It will essentially force a renegotiation of the USB power level to a lower level if the temperature gets too hot. Any claims of the battery or device end sounds like it's not true, I've seen this on various ads for power adapters and it's just not true. The device can also trigger a renegotiation or just ask for less power anytime, but that's on the device side. Essentially the communications is about power level between the devices.
Would you recommend the anker 67w for small devices like phones Earbuds and a nintendo switch and bluetooth speaker? I dont got any large devices like a laptop
Yeah, it is fine for those devices. The device decides how much power to use so they’ll charge at low watts, the good thing is the charger will be operating at fairly low power so hopefully won’t get too hot.
@@AllThingsOnePlace think it's worth it to upgrade to 100w Anker (2023) or just stick to the Anker 67w for my galaxy, switch and other small electronics?
Can chargers really damage batteries? Isn't it up to the device to regulate the power coming in to ensure things remain safe? The charger is just a supply. One of my apps monitors temps during charging and I find my phone will slow down the charging once the battery gets up to a certain temp. Yes heat is bad for a battery but that is integrated over time. That's why if I were for example doing a wireless charge vs a cabled charge, I'd rather just plug it in and shorten the amount of time my battery gets warm. Some of these phones charge so fast, I'm pretty sure the heat from CPU or a hot environment hurts the battery more since it is over a prolonged period vs the few minutes that it's charging.
The charger can inflict damage in uncontrolled situations, modern phones don't really allow this, they do as you say, regulate. Some phones, allow damage essentially by letting you opt in to faster charging, Samsung 45W charging for example. But yeah, even still there are protections in place. Long term charging at 45W peak versus 20W peak has some suspected impact. The issue is there's not a lot of published information out there on this. Battery specific data sure, mostly all paywalled or double paywalled, IEEE is double paywalled now, but no data on in device performance and degradation. It takes a long time and no one wants to do it. I'd do it if it was funded.
@@AllThingsOnePlace I think it is pretty hard to research this unless one is able to break things down and really determine what's going on. I've already read that for battery health, you avoid heat and don't over/under charge. Outside of heat, I don't know if actually charging at higher power alone does anything to damage the battery. That is what I was curious about. I suppose if one really wants to be safe, they can hook their phone up to a 5W charger and let it sit. On the other hand (my own theory) if I just fast charge it at top speed, I can literally charge my phone in a few minutes. So how bad is exposure to heat for a few minutes? I don't know. I know wireless charging causes my phone to heat up even slow charging so I figure that is bad either way. Even if one can plot out a curve of charging speed vs time vs battery life degradation, one also needs to factor in how much usage of the phone degrades the battery. If I'm in a hot environment, playing a game, etc, the phone will heat up too. Sometimes much longer than a charge cycle. My theory is that this has more of an affect on battery life than the few minutes I'm charging for. Then, how long does the average person keep their phone for and how bad does it have to get to matter. My phone brand knew lasted over two days with "average" use. 5yrs later, it's now just under one day. (ie. on a busy day, I may need to recharge). It's only now that I really care but after 5yrs, I want a new phone anyways. I think its like nutritional epidemiology. There's just way too many variables to get a good answer. BTW, if you want to link to some IEEE articles, those of us can access might be interested in reading what's out there.
Ok, I got a question. You’re saying the older Anker 735 was a better performing adapter compared to their new 67W adapter. The 735 was not able to charge a Steam Deck optimally (the low charge warning constantly triggered with it), even though it was well within spec to do so, and Anker admitted to the problem. The new 67W adapter can. If the 735 was the “better” adapter, what gives with the Steam Deck charging? This issue existed on all of their 2022 series 7 adapters. I believe this high-visibly issue for them was one of the reasons they released new adapters so quickly. Everyone was looking for Steam Deck adapters in 2022. Any insight into this would be amazing. Thank you!
Yeah, functionally, they made improvements to the whole line which is certainly welcome. I kind of roll that into the it negotiates better but keep it vague purposefully since it can cover so much. In this case the device is marginally less efficient. As I was saying in the video they’re really all kind of the same for power performance, it comes down to that better charging negotiation with more devices.
@@AllThingsOnePlace Oh fyi, I mentioned this in an Amazon review recently. Anker got back to me immediately and offered refunds on all of my 2022 adapters, even though I bought them over a year ago. Kinda crazy. Anyway, keep up the great work.
@@roguegeek In some sense yes, the adapter figures out what's plugged in and how to deliver power more effectively, in this case they also added more modes, it doesn't mean it'll deliver more power by any means or if the requests are beyond the capability it will work but that of course makes sense. Also, crazy on the refund policy, Anker is more expensive but in general I have heard good things about the customer service.
@@AllThingsOnePlace You should also add CUKTECH 20 Power Bank, 25,000mAh 210W which seems like a new company with new products so you should add that to your list too! They look quite interesting.
@@EdgarCool4ever Someone mentioned they merged with ZMI and in looking at it that Cuktech looks like the same one as the ZMI no20 power bank I already reviewed.
I'd go for the 100W adapter over the 67W. It did great internationally too and on the plane. I did have to hold it into the socket on the plane though, the sockets are so worn out...
I don't know if they have the Bavin brand on where you live but Bavin sell some cheaply suspicious gan chargers rated at 100w, they actually sell 3 types 100w gan chargers ranging from 26-36 usd if you convert it from our currency with each being around 4 dollars more expensive than the previous one. There's also the romoss 100 and 140w gan charger as well as aukey. If you ever get your hands on them, I would like to see a review of them and see how they fair. Thank you
The Aukey stuff was not great that I looked at. I didn't get any higher wattage ones though. I haven't seen the Bavin brand yet though but I will keep an eye out for them.
@@AllThingsOnePlaceBavin is quite a popular brand here at southeast asia and sell a lot of consumer electronics. They mostly focus on charging devices though like chargers, cables and powerbanks which are very cheap compared to competitors and they recently released multiple gan chargers rated at 100w which I found pretty weird seeing that they only differ in their design with two being rectangular(one with 3, the other with 4 ports) while the most expensive one is square shaped(has 4 ports). I don't see many people reviewing bavin chargers as in depth as you so I would like to see your opinion on their products seeing that the items they focus on aligns with your channel...
my Mcdodo just broken today and now it only able to use one port out of three, thankfully it is still the type c one though, i intended to replace it, still thinking getting just dual port Anker, Aukey or Ugreen with probably less than 65w since i only use it for my smartphone and watch charger Any recommendation between Anker, Aukey or Ugreen for the charger? Thank you in advance
I mean between those three, Anker has been the best and most consistent showing of chargers. They are the biggest one and certainly have some junk on the market with the good stuff but in direct comparison with UGREEN or Aukey they win.
Anker is by port. They typically label one port with a phone and one with a laptop symbol. The laptop port becomes 47W and the phone port becomes 20W (5,9V modes only).
Great video, I was thinking about getting the newer 67W Anker just because it's smaller than the older 65W one, but after watching this I'll probably go for one of the higher output ones since they seem to be more effcient and can also charge a secondary device in addtion to my laptop or ROG Ally. Any chance you can review the 65W GaN USB C Charger by RUIDUN? It looks like a great travel option for my ROG Ally, it's pretty unique in terms of form factor and charging capabilities, 65W out of the USB-C and 45W QC on USB-A. Thanks for the videos
Hmm. If it is a phone and a watch those are both fairly low wattage devices so basically anything with two USB C ports and a relatively high efficiency. I'd check for a safety listing. So, out of the ones in this video any will work. I do tend to use the more efficient larger adapter but I have it for laptops and things so it has double use.
This is the newest one. I didn't check if it has VOOC support, I have no way to test that. I have a tester that will say stuff but that doesn't mean it actually works.
I bought a Spigen 65W one (probably from an older series as it says PowerArc), and what I found is that there is a coil whine, which led me to refund the item. I have a McDodo one also, and it is worse than the Spigen :) I have a bunch of Apple adapters, and they are awesome; I do not hear any coil whine once, but I need a 60-65W dual/triple power adapter. Or do you have any other recommendations (you can advise any other charger which has headroom)? Gonna use the adapter with iPad Air (30/35W max) and 36W (9V 4A) max MagSafe charging station. Which brand/adapter has the least coil whine other than Apple? Thanks in advance!
Yeah, apple appears to try to make their OEM spends some time and effort on the quality of the adapters. The issue you will face with 65w adapters is they don't share fair. Also, 9V4A is not a valid request for USB PD, so that is a proprietary connection or requires PPS and a 5A cable, and a charger that will go that far. You are in the 100W adapter space to get compatible modes of operation.
@AllThingsOnePlace For the magsafe charger, I have found that it also supports 9V 2A (slower mode it seems, but really don’t care). Probably gonna buy from Anker, as I suppose they are using better components and isolate such cases better. Haven’t tried though. Thank you for the recommendation!
Una pregunta, porque los cargadores se calientan más después de varios usos. Me acuerdo cuando tiento algunos cargadores nuevos en sus primeras cargas y en cuestión de días calientan más y asi se mantiene la temperatura a futuro. Muchas gracias
Yeah, it is difficult to gauge what is hot for these chargers. The smaller they get the warmer the cases seem to be though. 60 degrees c on the case seems to be pretty normal.
Thanks, I added it to the list. I did one Acefast charger, it has no over current protection, super dangerous, I stopped looking at anything from them after that.
If apple’s official magsafe wireless charger is plugged all the time to the ankers 67w charger, does it draw power even when it dont charge? I heard that lightning to usb c draws power idle so id like to know does magsafe wireless charge do the same. Also how the anker 67w charger share the power to the ports? Sry for bad english
So, it is true that it needs power all the time. About 1W. The Anker with the magsafe cable plugged in will negotiate for 27W for that port so the remaining power would be available on the other port.
Hey guys! I’m just wondering if any you were experiencing the charging brick falling off the outlet? I’ve had my 735 for a while now and one of its ports is already loose so I’m thinking of buying this 67w as a replacement but I’m somehow in doubt because I’ve always had issue of 735 my brick falling on most outlets and I don't want to spend for this charger if it will just have the same issue. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Yeah, I literally use a power strip down to the floor because yes, they're too heavy and they fall out of the wall socket if it's loose, like on airplanes, forget it. The socket probably needs to be replaced in many cases but that involves an electrician and a lot of money.
Can you help me please I already ordered anker 735 65 w After that I came across anker 335 67 wat comes with cable 5A which I don't have I only have cable c that come with my s22u in box Should I cancel my 735 and buy the 335 because of the cable 5A ????? They are almost the same price on amazon right now
I would expect the S22 to come with a 5 amp cable. The three series Anker adapters tend to be measurably worse on the performance side. But it is up to you!
@@AllThingsOnePlace I tested gan charger from xiaomi and it read 40 volts from tip of the cord to ground using AC tester. Thank you very much 😌, maybe I consider buying this.
It is a trickly question because it is device specific. If you are only charging a phone, then any 30W adapter or smaller is plenty good. If you have a laptop or other devices, then add more ports, you need more watts.
I have the anker charger. is it normal that even though a cable is plugged into USB c 1 port with no connected device that the USB C 2 port is charging with a much lower speed? I noticed that while charging my Baseus Blade power bank. Only after unplugging the cable on USB C1 port it would charge with full speed.
Some do different negotiation but typically a cable alone should not negotiate anything (c-c). Unless it is an apple cable, then yes, it negotiates in the cable and ruins the speed of the other port with just a cable plugged in.
Well, it's interesting, so you can make things smaller since you drive the frequency higher but then you have more losses in the switching since you drove the frequency higher. Also, GaN devices do tend to have higher on resistance which also cancels some of the gains. With the all in one packages available you get more efficiency from other parts of the circuit though.
No, it's a bunch of criteria for AC safety of the device. Basically, checking to see how the device behaves in failure conditions and under duress that may happen while plugged into an AC socket to the interaction with people. UGREEN has some listed devices and some aren't. If it isn't generally I steer clear.
@@sportshighlights1900 There are various marks the device can have but in the the US or Canada there will be a company and a little US and C on the corners of the logo indicating it complies with an Underwriters Laboratory standard for safety. It is something on my to do list to go over the different logos on devices at some point.
@@AllThingsOnePlace So i dont know why but i have binge watched your videos for like 2-3 hours. but i need conclusion. what do you suggest for me, 1 charger that can charge iphone 15 pro (USB C), apple watch (USB C) and iphone 11 (USB A)? Thank!!!! :)
@@usamaakram913 Separate charger for each will certainly work. The only charger apple specifically lists for the 15 PRO is the 20W USB C charger, they say it works with larger ones but no specifics on what or how it is charging. They just need to say PD 9V-3A capable or whatever it is. Anyway, my go to is the Satechi 165W four port charger, which is a bit on the larger side but works with everything I've used it with, I don't have an iphone 15 to test though.
At the end of the video you should at least at bare minimum which you think is best.. I understand for the general viewing you don't want the plebs to just watch the last 15 seconds so I'm not sure how to add that in without people being assholes and not watching the whole video.
I should put it in the middle, just buy this one, then back to the regularly scheduled programming. Yeah, some people skip to the end. The majority, from the YT viewed percentage, skip to the chart then leave. It is expected that people bounce around though, I do the same thing watching other peoples videos.
Have you ever tried using essager cables or any digital usb c/a cable if its consumption in watts is legit as they say 100watts cable but when tested with your Power-Z PD 3.0 Protocol is it really 100watts? Can you make a video review for us please? We need more video like this one: th-cam.com/users/shortssjm_Yyr6zRM?si=IARhYIEh-YCTObnT
That isn't a link to a video. There's a series on USB cables on the channel. I didn't test any essager ones. You don't want the cable to consume watts.
![PASULOL รามเกียรติ์ ตอนที่ 4 นนทกพบรัก [Ramakien Ep.4: Nonthok in love]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tMUQgmZzf_A/mqdefault.jpg)
Dude thank you so much for doing these! I can watch these all days.
Thanks!
Yes sir we'll done! I'm in the market.
I bought mcdodo GaN 65w charger less than 20 dollars, happy to hear the performance, not bad ❤can't wait to see power bank comparison 👍
Thanks for watching.
Hows the performance on charging a laptop
@@ys-50989 good performance, no heating, I haven't face any issue but 65w is odd, can be use only one port to charge laptops, if you use another port the charging speed decreased, atleast 100W is a must, my thought
Thanks for your video!! You always provide the info no one else does.
I bought the Anker A2669 some weeks before I got to know your channel. Although it works perfectly with all my devices and looks like a quality product, now I'm kinda regretting my purchase. It looks like a step back from the A2668 in terms of efficiency. I've had always great experience with Anker products, but in this particular case, I'm a bit disappointed with the brand.
If it works that is a good and hopefully it keeps working for a long time. The efficiency is close, splitting hairs on the differences really. Anker does tend to release products on both ends of the spectrum each time. In this case really average with the competition.
@@AllThingsOnePlaceAfter my initial disappointment with this charger, I've come to view it in a more positive way.
This new version does support 5 amps in PPS mode (IIRC, the previous version only supported up to 3 amps). And the power distribution between the different outputs is more flexible in the new version.
All in all, I no longer see this adapter to be a bad purchase. It fills my needs for a smartphone charger that supports PPS mode. And it's also great as a 65W charger for a laptop I only use from time to time.
Great video , currently i just lost my anker 737, usually use to charge my Thinkpad but I have some issue because it need some time to make it normal charge because it's voltage maybe,now im looking for the replacement between anker a2669 and anker735, I do compare between them ,it says that a2669 can simultaneously charge 2 port in 65 watt but not with anker 735 ,is is right, i still dont get how its efficiency effect in daily use ,is it to the battery life or how, please give the recommendation between a668 67 and 735 or maybe other ugreen thanks for your reply
After the star showing of the Prime 100w, it is disappointing to see that the Prime 67w looks to be a step back from the 735.
Yeah, typical though.
In terms of efficiency, yeah it seems like that. The power distribution between the USB-C ports is more flexible with this one though. And now it also has the 12-V PD output, that was typically lacking in Anker chargers. But if efficiency is very important to you, yeah, it looks like a step back.
Edit: mistype.
@@ethereal026 I bought the 735 with UK plug for £35, and rarely need to charge really quickly. I’ll stick with this for the time being but was hoping for more efficient lower wattage chargers by now.
To add another angle to "100W is more power efficient and does more"(also just watched the 735/737/747 review where you suggest skipping all 65W PA): I bought initially Anker 120W(737), mostly for my laptop but later bought Anker's 67W(A2669) and switched to that because 120W was almost overheating the battery while 67W charges it plenty fast without heating the battery at all(at least the surface of the laptop does not change temps, it seems) - in my calculation, the cost of the laptop(degrading the battery - I had a phone die on me fast because of fast charging overheating the battery) is significantly higher than a few W I might be losing.
That is an angle, but it is also up to the device to decide how fast to charge. The power adapter is just the supply. There is always the option of using a 60W rated USB cable to force a slower charge with a more efficient adapter. For phones, yeah, it's ridiculous, they're forcing charging speeds that small batteries can't handle and it may work for a few demos but in the long run the batteries do not last. Samsung has a toggle for those faster charging modes for a reason. The power adapter doesn't force anything on the device though. So, if a laptop maker decides to allow fast charging they hopefully did the work to make sure the battery and electronics can handle that.
I just wanted and power adapter to be a small as possible
and able charge my 60w laptop and smart phone,
so I picked the 67 watt before I had seen your review.
@@AllThingsOnePlaceWhat charging speed do you recommend for Samsung devices?
Nice to see more 12V becoming more common.
What is 12v for?
Some devices use 12V. I think it's most useful to use one of these adapters as a replacement for a couple wall warts since a lot of those end up being 12V.
@@brandonmorris3746basically everything low power with those barrel connectors, fiber optic devices(NT) modems, routere, tv boxes, android tv boxes, toothbrush chargers, etc
Another great review as always, can't wait for the anker 240w desktop charger review and keep up the good work!
haha, yeah, I'm avoiding that one. It looks like it's a 140W max single port adapter with an extra 100W tacked on but yeah eventually it'll be on. No rush on that one.
@@AllThingsOnePlaceglad you made it eventually :) I posted a question on it
In that, I subbed and think your videos are awesome. I don't understand most of the ripple points but I find it very interesting. I have about 40tabs open of your videos watching this one lol.
Yeah, people seem to binge there way though once they find it. People end up reminding me of things from previous videos like, oh yeah, I guess I did say that, ha.
I wonder how a homemade GaN charger would be like if size isn't a issue?
Yeah, you can squeeze a few more percent out, you really have to overbuild to get more though. Switch topologies, spend an unreal amount of time and money optimizing the transformer.
I would have loved to see ugreen included in these reviews they are kinda populair in europe and they seem good for the price they would be nice to be compared to
UGREEN has lots of videos on the channel. I do these kind of mini comparisons with a few different, untested, adapters. There's no particular rhyme or reason.
@@AllThingsOnePlace I’m new to your channel I will check them out, I’m currently looking for a dual usb c charger since the iPhone is usb c and I have to keep changing the cable to charge my phone and airpods max, these videos help allot
I was really hoping the 67 watt Anker would at least have PFC seeing as it's over the "65W" limit most people claim is the new legal limit(even though I haven't seen any paperwork saying it changed from 75w) but I was at least hoping brand new series, expensive new tech. Sad but not surprising
Yeah, they went for small as possible again instead of efficiency and performance in this one.
McDodo earns packaging points back because the main outer box is a standard size they use for 10-15 different bricks. the inner plastic molding is just swapped out. So at least they aren't designing custom packaging for each.. they probably can't afford to lol.
hmmm, yeah that's an interesting approach.
Hello, what do you think is a better option in order to charge Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Watch 5Pro in the same time? Anker Prime 67w or the Ugreen Nexode pro 65w? Thanks and keep going with the videos!!
I haven't looked at the nexode pro 65W so no opinion. The prime 67W was underwhelming.
Can you help me please I already ordered anker 735 65 w
After that I came across anker 335 67 wat comes with cable 5A which I don't have I only have cable c that come with my s22u in box
Should I cancel my 735 and buy the 335 because of the cable 5A ?????
They are almost the same price on amazon right now
I love your technical reviews, already subscribed. Any video comparing *the best* dual USB-C models or planning to do one? I'm about to travel and got interested in which could give the best value. Cheers!
Thanks! I don't have any specific plans for that style, I've looked at several in various videos. There's little reasoning to the adapters I pick, just pick some and test them. I do have some more multiport lower wattage adapters to test though. As far as what is the best one so far monoprice 42620 is good if you only need to charge phones and lower powered devices. The Insignia has a few less output options but it can charge 20V devices as a bonus over the monoprice, then the mcdodo 40W dual port has lots of charging modes so probably the most capable but it is a little less efficient. The apple 35W ones aren't amazing and very expensive.
@AllThingsOnePlace Thanks for your reviews, what about the Baseus 130W gan5 pro charger?
I can't get it. I've tried. My order keeps getting canceled.
@@AllThingsOnePlace Please don't give up. Let's hope that this is just a delivery problem of a new product and not an attempt to avoid a not so good test result.
How do you feel about Mokin bricks? I've been using their 3-port 65w for a month now and I am impressed. I can't seem to find any of them on your channel even though lots of them sell on Amazon. I found them on prime day. Got the brick shipped for $16.
Wow, yeah, that's really inexpensive. I haven't looked at them, but I'm gonna check it out. It does look unique too so I don't think it's just another clone.
Spigen tried to spoof their way into the chart with that "quality power" sticker! Tech is getting so cheap that there isn't much difference between them. The only thing I don't really like is Anker always leaning towards the low side when it comes to DC voltage. Still looking forward for more power banks, those aren't tested accurately on the internet and your video format is the best I've found.
Yeah, I think their claim is the DC output is perfectly stable, this was the worst of the bunch. The format is slowly evolving hopefully will get a little better over time although not much has changed this year.
@@AllThingsOnePlace Rome wasn't built in a day. Can't wait to see what's in store for the future!
@@AllThingsOnePlacedo you think it's possible that you just had a defective unit? It would’ve been great if you tested 2 identical devices to get an average
@@Mr_nah Yeah, it is a possibility, but the probability is very low. I have tested more than one of several samples and found that the data isn't any different as long as the unit is functional. If it doesn't work then things get interesting. I did that too.
@@AllThingsOnePlace thanks, you've got a new subscriber.
65w cube is my go to in term of size and capability, especially for travel. 100w 3rd party GaN isn't much different in size compared to older si adaptor. If anything the port and cable became more of a mess unless you specifically require power and ports (ie photo and videography) in which case desktop style power adapter is a better option anyway
Thanks for sharing! I think it's great that the market has all these options, I certainly tend to use the higher port count and power devices.
Hello guy . I just bought anker prime 67w a2669 a few days before knowing your video, is this a good device? I use for apple devices
It is fine. It is just so close the dimensions and weight of the 100W, which is better, but also more expensive that I gave it decreased recommendation. But it is a perfectly safe charger to use with your apple devices.
@@AllThingsOnePlace thanks you i like your video !!
The Anker 100 Watt 317 model is available for under 30.00, but is this really the best quality for under 30.00 out there in this 100 Watt Range
the author of the videos I feel gives this Anker model mixed reviews about it:
Yeah, I wasn't happy with that one.
love your channel, but i have 1 question.
when you mention the idle power consumption i can't help but wonder if that value would be different for 230V 50Hz outlets, since you seem to be testing it on 120V 60Hz or does it make no difference?
Yes, it will be higher on 240V AC typically. I do the test on both sometimes.
Which one should you choose between Anker 735 Charger (Nano II 65W) and Anker 735 Charger (GaNPrime 65W) and Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (3 Ports)?
The 100W prime charger, ha. Nano II and the GaNPrime are both about equal. If I needed more ports the GanPrime is probably the choice for most people due to that. I have taken the Nano II several times because in the field I usually dedicate one port to one device. So, last time I used it, it was directly powering a camera for a whole day but my use case may not align with others.
Love your videos!
Requesting reviews for adapters that work for Australia/New Zealand please!
Yeah, these mostly all will work there but yeah I don't have any with the plug style as native. I'm slowly working on adding some other ones in. I have a few EU ones I got at Saturn.
I'd love a review of the Insignia model! Got the 100watt variant on a crazy deal and I wonder how it compares. The usual MSRP is fairly high.
I have a bunch of Insignia ones to test still. I have a bunch of power banks too.
Great vid. Would love to see how Nomad 130w 3-port USB-C adapter compares…
Different class of device. I do have some Nomad devices here, not sure if I have that one though. Either way, I added it to the list.
I'm getting the Anker 735 and not the Anker 67 because it is much cheaper. I really need the three ports and the 100 w Baseus you said was more efficient is to big to carry on a bag but maybe I will buy that later for my desk charge all charger for all devices including my laptop. I was wondering if the AC leakage on the Anker 735 and the 67 w ok since they have both safety listing?
Anker in both teardowns and testing I have done, I haven't tested all of them or torn down all of them by any means, generally does good in leakage tests.
@@AllThingsOnePlace Thanks!
Which will be the safest charger for laptop(65w) and mobile(25-45w) , for longer term usage which will not damage the battery more pls suggest
Kind of take your pick, there are plenty of safe options on the market. I generally stay away from 65W devices. The Amazon Basics 65W is okay, but it's only one port. As you say more, damage is inevitable in batteries, every charge and discharge cycle causes the battery to degrade a little. The charger being sized appropriately and the device only using what it needs while managing temperatures is what makes the battery last longer. I personally like a 20 - 30 W charger like the UGREEN 30W Nexode, or the Google 30W charger, Belkin is good too...
Could you explain how the Anker “active shield 2.0” works?
I have looked on the Anker website and on the Amazon listing, but there are no real technical details or parameters on it.
I was looking for find out if it monitors the device battery temperature ? Under what protocol would the device battery temperature send that information to the charger?
Or does it only monitor the temperature of the charging brick itself and use that as the reference temperature?
I have learned a lot from you and any input you have on this would be appreciated!
Yeah, just from a power electronics perspective and teardowns I've seen, it use a separate microcontroller to monitor internal temperatures. It will essentially force a renegotiation of the USB power level to a lower level if the temperature gets too hot. Any claims of the battery or device end sounds like it's not true, I've seen this on various ads for power adapters and it's just not true. The device can also trigger a renegotiation or just ask for less power anytime, but that's on the device side. Essentially the communications is about power level between the devices.
Thanks!
Hi, i just purchased A2669, did it make a good purchase ?
It's okay, it is about an average performance adapter for that category. As usual the 100W adapters tend to beat the pants off of these.
@@AllThingsOnePlace thanks, It was great it charges my samsung devices at full 45w speed. Thank you for your amazing work. Keep it up.
I was wondering if those Ultranet chargers were good! they've been really cheap lately compared to Ugreen or Anker
Yeah, seems to be about on par performance wise with what other people are selling which is pretty surprising at that price point.
Good work as always 🎉
Thank you so much 😀
Hi, I will just be using the charger to charge my handphone and smartwatch. Do you recommend I get the 100W version or this 67W will be enough??
Either one is good.
Would you recommend the anker 67w for small devices like phones Earbuds and a nintendo switch and bluetooth speaker? I dont got any large devices like a laptop
Yeah, it is fine for those devices. The device decides how much power to use so they’ll charge at low watts, the good thing is the charger will be operating at fairly low power so hopefully won’t get too hot.
@@AllThingsOnePlace think it's worth it to upgrade to 100w Anker (2023) or just stick to the Anker 67w for my galaxy, switch and other small electronics?
@@budbx90if portability is not a concern, get the 100W as it is more power efficient, but if you need compact charger, 67W is smaller in dimensions
Can chargers really damage batteries? Isn't it up to the device to regulate the power coming in to ensure things remain safe? The charger is just a supply. One of my apps monitors temps during charging and I find my phone will slow down the charging once the battery gets up to a certain temp. Yes heat is bad for a battery but that is integrated over time. That's why if I were for example doing a wireless charge vs a cabled charge, I'd rather just plug it in and shorten the amount of time my battery gets warm. Some of these phones charge so fast, I'm pretty sure the heat from CPU or a hot environment hurts the battery more since it is over a prolonged period vs the few minutes that it's charging.
The charger can inflict damage in uncontrolled situations, modern phones don't really allow this, they do as you say, regulate. Some phones, allow damage essentially by letting you opt in to faster charging, Samsung 45W charging for example. But yeah, even still there are protections in place. Long term charging at 45W peak versus 20W peak has some suspected impact. The issue is there's not a lot of published information out there on this. Battery specific data sure, mostly all paywalled or double paywalled, IEEE is double paywalled now, but no data on in device performance and degradation. It takes a long time and no one wants to do it. I'd do it if it was funded.
@@AllThingsOnePlace I think it is pretty hard to research this unless one is able to break things down and really determine what's going on. I've already read that for battery health, you avoid heat and don't over/under charge. Outside of heat, I don't know if actually charging at higher power alone does anything to damage the battery. That is what I was curious about. I suppose if one really wants to be safe, they can hook their phone up to a 5W charger and let it sit. On the other hand (my own theory) if I just fast charge it at top speed, I can literally charge my phone in a few minutes. So how bad is exposure to heat for a few minutes? I don't know. I know wireless charging causes my phone to heat up even slow charging so I figure that is bad either way. Even if one can plot out a curve of charging speed vs time vs battery life degradation, one also needs to factor in how much usage of the phone degrades the battery. If I'm in a hot environment, playing a game, etc, the phone will heat up too. Sometimes much longer than a charge cycle. My theory is that this has more of an affect on battery life than the few minutes I'm charging for. Then, how long does the average person keep their phone for and how bad does it have to get to matter. My phone brand knew lasted over two days with "average" use. 5yrs later, it's now just under one day. (ie. on a busy day, I may need to recharge). It's only now that I really care but after 5yrs, I want a new phone anyways. I think its like nutritional epidemiology. There's just way too many variables to get a good answer. BTW, if you want to link to some IEEE articles, those of us can access might be interested in reading what's out there.
Ok, I got a question. You’re saying the older Anker 735 was a better performing adapter compared to their new 67W adapter. The 735 was not able to charge a Steam Deck optimally (the low charge warning constantly triggered with it), even though it was well within spec to do so, and Anker admitted to the problem. The new 67W adapter can. If the 735 was the “better” adapter, what gives with the Steam Deck charging?
This issue existed on all of their 2022 series 7 adapters. I believe this high-visibly issue for them was one of the reasons they released new adapters so quickly. Everyone was looking for Steam Deck adapters in 2022. Any insight into this would be amazing. Thank you!
Yeah, functionally, they made improvements to the whole line which is certainly welcome. I kind of roll that into the it negotiates better but keep it vague purposefully since it can cover so much. In this case the device is marginally less efficient. As I was saying in the video they’re really all kind of the same for power performance, it comes down to that better charging negotiation with more devices.
@@AllThingsOnePlace Makes sense. Thanks kindly, sir! Always looking forward to your videos.
@@AllThingsOnePlace Oh fyi, I mentioned this in an Amazon review recently. Anker got back to me immediately and offered refunds on all of my 2022 adapters, even though I bought them over a year ago. Kinda crazy. Anyway, keep up the great work.
@@AllThingsOnePlace So negotiation capabilities can potentially equate to compatibility?
@@roguegeek In some sense yes, the adapter figures out what's plugged in and how to deliver power more effectively, in this case they also added more modes, it doesn't mean it'll deliver more power by any means or if the requests are beyond the capability it will work but that of course makes sense. Also, crazy on the refund policy, Anker is more expensive but in general I have heard good things about the customer service.
Can you review of the Native union gan usb c wall charger PD 30w?? (The one with a LED indicator)
Also the their 240W usb c to usb c cables!
Thanks for the suggestions, I added them to the list.
@@AllThingsOnePlace You should also add CUKTECH 20 Power Bank, 25,000mAh 210W which seems like a new company with new products so you should add that to your list too! They look quite interesting.
@@EdgarCool4ever Someone mentioned they merged with ZMI and in looking at it that Cuktech looks like the same one as the ZMI no20 power bank I already reviewed.
Will you then recommend the 67W adapter and the 100W or the 67W is a hard pass and just get the 100W?
I'd go for the 100W adapter over the 67W. It did great internationally too and on the plane. I did have to hold it into the socket on the plane though, the sockets are so worn out...
I don't know if they have the Bavin brand on where you live but Bavin sell some cheaply suspicious gan chargers rated at 100w, they actually sell 3 types 100w gan chargers ranging from 26-36 usd if you convert it from our currency with each being around 4 dollars more expensive than the previous one. There's also the romoss 100 and 140w gan charger as well as aukey. If you ever get your hands on them, I would like to see a review of them and see how they fair. Thank you
The Aukey stuff was not great that I looked at. I didn't get any higher wattage ones though. I haven't seen the Bavin brand yet though but I will keep an eye out for them.
@@AllThingsOnePlaceBavin is quite a popular brand here at southeast asia and sell a lot of consumer electronics. They mostly focus on charging devices though like chargers, cables and powerbanks which are very cheap compared to competitors and they recently released multiple gan chargers rated at 100w which I found pretty weird seeing that they only differ in their design with two being rectangular(one with 3, the other with 4 ports) while the most expensive one is square shaped(has 4 ports). I don't see many people reviewing bavin chargers as in depth as you so I would like to see your opinion on their products seeing that the items they focus on aligns with your channel...
While you were missing, i procured 4 of Anker's, even found a Nano 45W ! 😃
Yeah, I probably can’t find my 45w nano ii.
my Mcdodo just broken today and now it only able to use one port out of three, thankfully it is still the type c one
though, i intended to replace it, still thinking getting just dual port Anker, Aukey or Ugreen with probably less than 65w since i only use it for my smartphone and watch charger
Any recommendation between Anker, Aukey or Ugreen for the charger? Thank you in advance
I mean between those three, Anker has been the best and most consistent showing of chargers. They are the biggest one and certainly have some junk on the market with the good stuff but in direct comparison with UGREEN or Aukey they win.
Can you use a 67w charger to charge an iPhone? Will it harm the phone with 67w? Or will the phone limit the power?
Yes you can use a 67W charger. I use a 165W charger. The phone decides how much power to use.
What's the maximum output from each C1 and C2 ports in case of simultaneous usage? Is it prioritized by device or by port ?
Anker is by port. They typically label one port with a phone and one with a laptop symbol. The laptop port becomes 47W and the phone port becomes 20W (5,9V modes only).
Great video, I was thinking about getting the newer 67W Anker just because it's smaller than the older 65W one, but after watching this I'll probably go for one of the higher output ones since they seem to be more effcient and can also charge a secondary device in addtion to my laptop or ROG Ally. Any chance you can review the 65W GaN USB C Charger by RUIDUN? It looks like a great travel option for my ROG Ally, it's pretty unique in terms of form factor and charging capabilities, 65W out of the USB-C and 45W QC on USB-A. Thanks for the videos
Yeah, I'm kind of in the same boat. The 100W just does more and works with more devices. I haven't tested any RUIDUN devices yet.
what do you recommend for apple charger and apple watch charger both usb c port
Hmm. If it is a phone and a watch those are both fairly low wattage devices so basically anything with two USB C ports and a relatively high efficiency. I'd check for a safety listing. So, out of the ones in this video any will work. I do tend to use the more efficient larger adapter but I have it for laptops and things so it has double use.
Is this the newest anker 67w? I thought their 67w have vooc support on usbA 😮
This is the newest one. I didn't check if it has VOOC support, I have no way to test that. I have a tester that will say stuff but that doesn't mean it actually works.
I bought a Spigen 65W one (probably from an older series as it says PowerArc), and what I found is that there is a coil whine, which led me to refund the item. I have a McDodo one also, and it is worse than the Spigen :) I have a bunch of Apple adapters, and they are awesome; I do not hear any coil whine once, but I need a 60-65W dual/triple power adapter. Or do you have any other recommendations (you can advise any other charger which has headroom)? Gonna use the adapter with iPad Air (30/35W max) and 36W (9V 4A) max MagSafe charging station. Which brand/adapter has the least coil whine other than Apple? Thanks in advance!
Yeah, apple appears to try to make their OEM spends some time and effort on the quality of the adapters. The issue you will face with 65w adapters is they don't share fair. Also, 9V4A is not a valid request for USB PD, so that is a proprietary connection or requires PPS and a 5A cable, and a charger that will go that far. You are in the 100W adapter space to get compatible modes of operation.
I swear I answered this comment. Anyway, apple is kind of the top dog. Anker usually does a good job filling adapters to reduce noise.
@AllThingsOnePlace For the magsafe charger, I have found that it also supports 9V 2A (slower mode it seems, but really don’t care). Probably gonna buy from Anker, as I suppose they are using better components and isolate such cases better. Haven’t tried though. Thank you for the recommendation!
@@AllThingsOnePlace I can see your old comment from 35 min ago :) Thank you again!
Una pregunta, porque los cargadores se calientan más después de varios usos. Me acuerdo cuando tiento algunos cargadores nuevos en sus primeras cargas y en cuestión de días calientan más y asi se mantiene la temperatura a futuro. Muchas gracias
Yeah, it is difficult to gauge what is hot for these chargers. The smaller they get the warmer the cases seem to be though. 60 degrees c on the case seems to be pretty normal.
I miss the ultranet chargers from Amazon. 21 dollars for 65watts
Price was right.
Hi, Can you please review the Momax 1 100 w travel charger.? Thank you.
Thanks for the suggestion, I added it to the list.
Belkin 65w vs anker 65w comparison
No preference.
Plzz review essager cables and adapters
They’re on the list. Not sure exactly when they’ll be out.
Acefast 65w transparent charger review if possible
Thanks, I added it to the list. I did one Acefast charger, it has no over current protection, super dangerous, I stopped looking at anything from them after that.
What are your favorite watt categories?
Probably 100w since it offers enough power for several devices.
If apple’s official magsafe wireless charger is plugged all the time to the ankers 67w charger, does it draw power even when it dont charge? I heard that lightning to usb c draws power idle so id like to know does magsafe wireless charge do the same. Also how the anker 67w charger share the power to the ports? Sry for bad english
So, it is true that it needs power all the time. About 1W. The Anker with the magsafe cable plugged in will negotiate for 27W for that port so the remaining power would be available on the other port.
Hey guys! I’m just wondering if any you were experiencing the charging brick falling off the outlet? I’ve had my 735 for a while now and one of its ports is already loose so I’m thinking of buying this 67w as a replacement but I’m somehow in doubt because I’ve always had issue of 735 my brick falling on most outlets and I don't want to spend for this charger if it will just have the same issue.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Yeah, I literally use a power strip down to the floor because yes, they're too heavy and they fall out of the wall socket if it's loose, like on airplanes, forget it. The socket probably needs to be replaced in many cases but that involves an electrician and a lot of money.
Can you help me please I already ordered anker 735 65 w
After that I came across anker 335 67 wat comes with cable 5A which I don't have I only have cable c that come with my s22u in box
Should I cancel my 735 and buy the 335 because of the cable 5A ?????
They are almost the same price on amazon right now
I would expect the S22 to come with a 5 amp cable. The three series Anker adapters tend to be measurably worse on the performance side. But it is up to you!
Can you pls comments on the Basus CCGP120001 65 watts Charger?
I believe that's the same as what the US market has as the GaN6 charger. I haven't looked at it yet but I have it.
Does this have a tiny shock at the tip of the cord when it taps our skin?
The anker is surprisingly good for this, meaning low shock. I haven't tested all of them in this video though.
@@AllThingsOnePlace I tested gan charger from xiaomi and it read 40 volts from tip of the cord to ground using AC tester. Thank you very much 😌, maybe I consider buying this.
I love your videos
Thanks.
Anker is the Best
They put on the box they are no1.
So whats best adapter here ??
It is a trickly question because it is device specific. If you are only charging a phone, then any 30W adapter or smaller is plenty good. If you have a laptop or other devices, then add more ports, you need more watts.
I have the anker charger. is it normal that even though a cable is plugged into USB c 1 port with no connected device that the USB C 2 port is charging with a much lower speed? I noticed that while charging my Baseus Blade power bank. Only after unplugging the cable on USB C1 port it would charge with full speed.
Some do different negotiation but typically a cable alone should not negotiate anything (c-c). Unless it is an apple cable, then yes, it negotiates in the cable and ruins the speed of the other port with just a cable plugged in.
@@AllThingsOnePlace thank you! C1 port was indeed plugged in with an apple lightning cable.
GAN doesn't seem to have much of an advantage as I thought. Seems run of the mill....
Well, it's interesting, so you can make things smaller since you drive the frequency higher but then you have more losses in the switching since you drove the frequency higher. Also, GaN devices do tend to have higher on resistance which also cancels some of the gains. With the all in one packages available you get more efficiency from other parts of the circuit though.
Does anyone know how good the "UGREEN Nexode 45W USB C Charger" is? I bought it for the price of $29.23 CAD and was wondering if it was a good deal.
not at all, it doesnt have us safety certiticated
@@PhucNguyen-sg7fqWhat do you mean safety certificate? Is it like warranty right?
No, it's a bunch of criteria for AC safety of the device. Basically, checking to see how the device behaves in failure conditions and under duress that may happen while plugged into an AC socket to the interaction with people. UGREEN has some listed devices and some aren't. If it isn't generally I steer clear.
@@AllThingsOnePlace How would you be able to check this information? I'm sorry, I am new to all this and wanted to learn more!
@@sportshighlights1900 There are various marks the device can have but in the the US or Canada there will be a company and a little US and C on the corners of the logo indicating it complies with an Underwriters Laboratory standard for safety. It is something on my to do list to go over the different logos on devices at some point.
whats the conclusion?????
They work but they aren't the best adapters out there.
@@AllThingsOnePlace So i dont know why but i have binge watched your videos for like 2-3 hours. but i need conclusion. what do you suggest for me, 1 charger that can charge iphone 15 pro (USB C), apple watch (USB C) and iphone 11 (USB A)?
Thank!!!! :)
@@AllThingsOnePlace or should I get separate charger for each one? if that's the case, what chargers do you recommend? I hope you will reply me :)
@@usamaakram913 Separate charger for each will certainly work. The only charger apple specifically lists for the 15 PRO is the 20W USB C charger, they say it works with larger ones but no specifics on what or how it is charging. They just need to say PD 9V-3A capable or whatever it is. Anyway, my go to is the Satechi 165W four port charger, which is a bit on the larger side but works with everything I've used it with, I don't have an iphone 15 to test though.
Test anker nano 3 511
I did.
@@AllThingsOnePlace okay thank you, I search for it
I'm not buying anything with a name like McDoDo!
hahaha
Anker donut?
Yeah, anker provided a suction cup ring that went around the adapter to hold it in the socket, it’s in the review of the GaN Prime adapters.
At the end of the video you should at least at bare minimum which you think is best.. I understand for the general viewing you don't want the plebs to just watch the last 15 seconds so I'm not sure how to add that in without people being assholes and not watching the whole video.
I should put it in the middle, just buy this one, then back to the regularly scheduled programming. Yeah, some people skip to the end. The majority, from the YT viewed percentage, skip to the chart then leave. It is expected that people bounce around though, I do the same thing watching other peoples videos.
Have you ever tried using essager cables or any digital usb c/a cable if its consumption in watts is legit as they say 100watts cable but when tested with your Power-Z PD 3.0 Protocol is it really 100watts? Can you make a video review for us please?
We need more video like this one:
th-cam.com/users/shortssjm_Yyr6zRM?si=IARhYIEh-YCTObnT
That isn't a link to a video. There's a series on USB cables on the channel. I didn't test any essager ones. You don't want the cable to consume watts.
Please Review ROMOSS DEBUTS MASSIVE 40,000MAH POWER BANK WITH 65W CHARGING FOR YOUR PHONE + LAPTOP
Thanks for the suggestion.