The Recovery Shackle Destruction Test - Unsealed 4X4

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 263

  • @Weetbix1969
    @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    the important thing to remember with rated bow shackles is only ever put the pin back into the shackle it came out of as 2 different ones may look the same but then the pin fit can be different (can be best to engrave or stamp the shank and head of the pin with a number to match) i was a chain and rigging certifier for 9 1/2 years and seen many fail because of people using the wrong pins. i had a mobile van with testbed system like what was in vid that did up to a 30tn pull so could test anywhere in the country. another very important thing is NEVER believe any rigger that tells you the old method of doing them up then backing off a 1/4 turn. this can leave the pin loose and in fact you can rock the pin in the thread when this is done (they would do it so they could undo it easier) it is dangerous and can spit the pin out and also you will find every time the pin has still gotten tighter as it has stretched the shackle slightly each time until it is to stretched to use. rule is if the pin when screwed in doesn't meet the outside of the shackle (at least flush with the side) discard it as its stretched. the reason they have a hole in the pin is to assist with undoing them as riggers would carry a marlin spike they could put in and twist them off the other reason is if you affix one permanently you can since wire through the hole and around the shank.

  • @rm-cl8su
    @rm-cl8su 5 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Contrary to what this guy says, don'r ever use any lifting gear once its been subjected to stresses beyond its rated capacity.

  • @ken85225
    @ken85225 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    orange soft shackle against an abrupt 90 degree edge started to shear right there and that was the most interesting thing about your tests......sure would have been nice to have actual numbers when each one broke....especially the soft shackle.

  • @muzzaball
    @muzzaball 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    35 Tonne from my 4.7T rated shackle - now that's a safety margin right there!!

  • @ridermak4111
    @ridermak4111 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I seriously doubt that a rated shackle ever hurt/killed anyone because it failed.
    Whatever it was attached to is what failed, launching it.

  • @reesemadere2545
    @reesemadere2545 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The rated things like shackles, rigging straps or similar things used with cranes or heavy equipment are the way to go. They are rated at 1/4-1/5 their breaking point

    • @brianmorrison9066
      @brianmorrison9066 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      10:1

    • @nategibbons172
      @nategibbons172 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brianmorrison9066 A factor of 10? Not even. 5:1 is most common for US shackles

  • @ryanburbridge
    @ryanburbridge 6 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    As a crane operator(IUOE Local 12) we use good quality steel shackles made in USA only. Mainly because Chinese steel dose not have the same grain structure and usually fails without deforming. USA or German steel will deform considerably before failing. FYI space x uses the shit out of rope slings. They make them on site and they are stronger then steel for the size. Take care.

    • @the701man
      @the701man 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      cool story

    • @JaakkoF
      @JaakkoF 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice story that explains how fucking cheap you are, if you buy only cheap stuff and then generalise the whole country from it. Sorry, but rated stuff is what it says on the label, has certs and costs the same more or less, no matter where it is made.

    • @alli333o
      @alli333o 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ever heard of german, japanese or even swedish steel?
      Amarican steel? Bitch, please...

    • @ToiletduckX
      @ToiletduckX 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@alli333o I have, most of it was dug out of the ground here in Australia ;)

    • @M-FE
      @M-FE 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hey cool I’m iuoe 115 , I work with rigging on a daily basis . We us quality Crosby or CM branded shackles . They don’t snap like that one did . I don’t care where they are manufactured they are both a quality branded , and trusted piece of rigging used in most North American industry . But let’s agree on something here, this video was pointless . MORAL OF THE STORY , use correct rigging and practice safest and smartest rigging practices . If your breaking a 3/4” or 7/8” shackle , YOUR DOING IT WRONG !

  • @dazaspc
    @dazaspc 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The title for this video should read "Trolling people who know lifting equipment, trying to kill those who dont"

  • @davidsirmons
    @davidsirmons 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The total material in the support rings of that yellow shackle is actually the amount of material I need in muscle-frame connections in an exosuit. Seems high carbon forged steel is more worthwhile than I thought. I'm glad I clicked this video.

  • @wb5mgr
    @wb5mgr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If you are using a recovery strap with a sewn loop or a traditional nylon sling with sewn loops...a shackle with the proper width and pin size is mandatory. If not you could cut the strap rating by half or more.

  • @s4060
    @s4060 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Legends! Cheers from all of us!

  • @wtechboy18
    @wtechboy18 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    damn. the sharp edge on that soft shackle really shredded it even with the sheath.

  • @demolitionbmxd
    @demolitionbmxd ปีที่แล้ว

    another great addition for when you need one is a mooseknuckle split shackle, expensive though.

  • @anomilumiimulimona2924
    @anomilumiimulimona2924 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally some shackle on shackle action!

  • @darrylm3627
    @darrylm3627 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good Stuff, Great Help, Good Tips 👍Thanks!

  • @Wreckitralph54
    @Wreckitralph54 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Standard shackles are stronger but the cool thing about soft shackles is you can attach them to more points for recovery.

  • @BlueCollarBachelor
    @BlueCollarBachelor 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The load cell used VanBeest shackles. Buy those.

  • @seanellington7184
    @seanellington7184 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If you arrange the soft shackle so the knot is @ 90 degree angle to the pull, it might fail @ even higher load. It would be interesting to see this tested.

  • @bobpfaff2258
    @bobpfaff2258 6 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    How absurd to think you could use the soft shackle a second time in the condition it ended up in.

    • @ryanburbridge
      @ryanburbridge 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Bob Pfaff wow your a dick lol. It’s not like there saying use it for lifting lol. If your stuck and that’s what you have bet your ass you’ll use it again. A a crane operator we use good quality steel shackles made in USA only. Mainly because Chinese steel dose not have the same grain structure and usually fails without deforming. USA or German steel will deform considerably before failing. FYI space x uses the shit out of rope slings. They make them on site and they are stronger then steel for the size. Take care.

    • @ArcticAstrophysics
      @ArcticAstrophysics 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think he means as an emergency backup or to possibly double up them. If the knot was retied it would probably take near the same force to break it again so unless you're pulling out someone who is extremely stuck then it would be pretty fine to use

    • @kylevanwinkle2081
      @kylevanwinkle2081 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Crosby, Campbell, new holland are the only 3 I trust. I've personally seen all 3 overload numerous times. In the crane and roughing world synthetic slings are quite amazing but they are no where near as strong as steel. That said steel doesnt like to grab round pipe and synthetic is just about the only thing that actually will

    • @tunacellis
      @tunacellis 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bob Pfaff and on proper rigging it still managed to surpass it's rated weight despite the damage from the previous two tests

    • @nextbestthingrc7446
      @nextbestthingrc7446 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree with you, but I didn’t know people still used “absurd”.

  • @FloatingDiogene
    @FloatingDiogene 6 ปีที่แล้ว +202

    I don't get why you would compare a unrated shackle without the same diameter of material the rated shackle had. Seems pretty unfair and biased.

    • @JSAFIXIT
      @JSAFIXIT 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Ryan Mcewen-Doris
      Not really. They are just showing you should not be cheap when it comes to stuff like this.

    • @Dasithkg
      @Dasithkg 6 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Advertising mate..
      If they had gotten a hardware store shackle of the same size as the rated one, they would have had similar results..
      And that would mean they can't advertise the TJM product as a better product

    • @marktate3431
      @marktate3431 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      There is more to a rated shackle than just the diameter of the material, the type of material and how they are made are also factors that determine their rating, an unrated shackle you have no idea what it is and it could be no more than a bent bit of mild steel round bar with a bolt poked through it... Nothing to do with damn brand since you can get unbranded and rated shackles. Use and unrated shackle and you are an idiot.

    • @Engineer9736
      @Engineer9736 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The test is just to show what to buy and what not. I can guarantee you that a professional brand shackle is much stronger. Those brands get all the material properties exactly right, as the cheap stuff just makes “something”. This is well known in the hoisting & lifting industry.

    • @tangledline
      @tangledline 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well..they are rated now..lol

  • @AZOverland2017
    @AZOverland2017 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video, thanks!

  • @SnowroxKT
    @SnowroxKT 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Excellent video, I've always been leery of soft shackles and have always used rated D shackles. After watching this I will keep using D shackles, but I might add a soft shackle to the gear as well since it can really help when a D shackle is not ideal.

  • @airbats801
    @airbats801 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you are buying proper shack;es like a crosby. The standard is design factor, aka safety factor is as follows. Carbon Shackle - 6/1
    Alloy Shackle - 5/1
    I enjoyed the video, and was fun to see the results of the soft shackle. I knew right away it would fail on the sharp edges, but they held up pretty good!

  • @deeess2694
    @deeess2694 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really, you needed to prove this. Any farmer could have told you this without testing. AGAIN common sense is all that is needed. Some things do not need testing.

  • @kadmow
    @kadmow 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    BTW, Anything "Rated" for lifting / winching in an industrial setting "sure as heck" better survive at least 4x the "rated" Safe working load when new. But that doesn't mean we can use a 5Tonne shackle for lifting 20Tonne, fatigue is a thing.
    That soft shackle should only be rated at 2.0-2.5Tonne MAX. At 8Tonne (8000kgf) there is no safety margin.
    Anytime any "rope" ( steel or fibre) goes over a sharp edge ( or a tight bend) it really needs protection (ie. a thimble of some type, not a soft sleeve.)

  • @fabienpics
    @fabienpics 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    👍👍👍👍 Thank you for this review

  • @Scott00
    @Scott00 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I prefer the D shackles but would use a soft shackle in conjunction if it were an application where Id actually WANT it to fail before attachment point.

  • @brissiAU
    @brissiAU 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    To all the people saying they should have used the same diameter shackles, you are missing the point, the good quality shackle had a safety factor of over seven, while the cheap one regardless of diameter barely made would have had a factor of 1.5.

  • @Engineer9736
    @Engineer9736 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    An interesting and honest test. Well done.

  • @drew79s
    @drew79s 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    That seems like a dangerously simplistic assessment outcome.
    The rated bow shackles are best if you're conducting a static recovery with known good anchors, such as a single line pull from one vehicle to another, or if you're doing a double line through a snatch block to a large tree etc. If you're doing a dynamic recovery, though, using a bow shackle as a link to tie two lines risks turning the system into a weapon system aimed at one of the vehicles, depending on which line breaks. Similarly, linking lines is better to do with a soft shackle, because line failure will result in the stored energy in the other line firing the shackle at the unfailed end.
    Soft shackles are better for linking lines, and bow shackles are better for attaching hardware to lines.

    • @imchris5000
      @imchris5000 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      its not an issue when you use properly rated gear to proper anchor points knowing the true forces will prevent any breaks in the first place.

    • @drew79s
      @drew79s 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@imchris5000 I think your view on this matter may be somewhat simplistic as well. In static recoveries equipment failures occur due to contract with rocks, vehicle structure or wear all the time, if you've used a steel shackle it will not be the point of failure in any of those examples. In those examples it will be one of the things attached to shackles instead, potentially turning them into weapons.
      All of that completely ignores dynamic recovery, in which you may be able to calculate forces for a given recovery with a team of engineers and a week, but in the real world nobody knows.

    • @imchris5000
      @imchris5000 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@drew79s you over think it. its actually pretty simple its just multiply mass and velocity. the real simple part is just like the manufacture of said shackles have a 5 to 1 or greater safety factor. inspect what you are attaching to dont use broken equipment. almost all breakage accidents come down to one of those three factors.
      its the little things like putting tape or tie wire on hooks so you dont end up wearing a chain to the back of the head when the hook unseats from bouncing your truck on it that will keep you alive

    • @drew79s
      @drew79s 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@imchris5000 uh huh... Dynamic recovery loads are dependent on the release load of the recovered vehicle and the total energy input. It will also depend on tm the characteristics of the strap, which will change over time. If you attach a snatch strap to something else with a hard shackle there's always the potential for you to fire the shackle at someone. Similarly having a line move and rub on a rock m result in the loss of a brand new extension in a static recovery.
      Hard shackles have a place, so do soft shackles.

  • @OzSigns
    @OzSigns 6 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Not a fair test, you have to test an unrated shackle just as big as the rated one.

    • @P38JLightning
      @P38JLightning 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I'm actually surprised that shitty little shackle took so much. One of similar size would probably actually be quite strong and not be good for their advertising agenda.

    • @DeadpoolWadeW
      @DeadpoolWadeW 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No you don't. The test was whether each shackle could take their load limit, and if so how far past the limit it can go. Doesn't matter if the sizes are different, the breaking mark is still the same regardless.

    • @kadmow
      @kadmow 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DeadpoolWadeW . An issue here is they are calling the "maximum survivable load" the "rating" for a soft shackle. In the real world for a "rated" piece of lifting gear, rated load is typically

    • @chrisbeatty743
      @chrisbeatty743 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kadmow that isn't lifting gear, it's off road recovery gear. A soft shackle should not be used for vertical lifting

    • @chrisbeatty743
      @chrisbeatty743 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You will not find an unrated shackle that is the same size as the rated one. If you do then it is probably Chinese junk because it would be a waste of steel and time to make an unrated 3/4" shackle that no one will use

  • @rage801
    @rage801 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great video but I don't understand why people keep ruining awesome videos with lame-ass music!

  • @09T53
    @09T53 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Working load limit ratings are for overhead lifting. Breaking strength ratings are for horizontal pulling. Soft shackles have breaking strength ratings, completely different than the WLL the steel shackle rating. But I’m sure all you crane operators and riggers knew that?

  • @nocoolname32
    @nocoolname32 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    there's videos like this on people on the interwebz still out there claiming the soft shacking is stronger than metal ones. they don't pay attention to words like WLL vs breaking strength, and lord knows they would never think about safety factors.

  • @HartyBiker
    @HartyBiker 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seek adventure just made some soft shackles at home and tested them. He got 26t before they broke

  • @atzerath
    @atzerath 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Apart from the rope; do this test again with rated and unrated shackles of the same dimensions..

    • @mattrickard3716
      @mattrickard3716 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      not a good idea. I reckon that the results would be similar enough for the more tight fisted/dim witted to figure that there is no point in spending extra $ on a rated shackle. Not worth the risk of litigation when someone does get killed by an unrated shackle that fails at far less than their test showed. "But Unsealed 4x4 said they break at such and such..." No thanks.

  • @junglejim4569
    @junglejim4569 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    After having 7 out of 8 tjm shocks fail and leak off-road, they are no different to any cheaper brands. Just a premium price to make you think it's quality.

  • @jaytrock3217
    @jaytrock3217 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video. One reason I do not like the soft shackle is the knot needs a big whole to go through. most recovery points are 3/4 in

    • @Weetbix1969
      @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      you feed the loop end through its narrower than the knot

  • @misters2837
    @misters2837 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was shocked at how well the hardware store shackle held up considering its basically junk... I do have some Stainless ones on the rear of my daily driver car...But they ONLY for recovering the 2200lb (1000KG) car out of the ditch in winter time...they have a breaking limit of 8400lb (3800KG)...and safety factor of 2 (WLL 1900KG), and I use BOTH at same time...

  • @77gravity
    @77gravity 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seeing the way the soft shackle failed, I will not be getting them. 9 tons, compared to 35 tons for the bow shackle.

  • @consaka1
    @consaka1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Loved the video and would like to see more soft shackles tested but can we get the outcome in LBS(pounds) as well as kilograms? Some of us backward folks here in the US haven't any reference with kilograms.

    • @323spy
      @323spy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      consaka1 1 kg is 2.2 lbs. If you just multiply by 2 you'll get a rough estimate

    • @consaka1
      @consaka1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks m8

    • @dplant8961
      @dplant8961 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi, @@consaka1.
      An even closer conversion is 5 Kg + 11 pounds.
      One Australian Tonne - 1,000 Kg = 2,200 pounds.
      Just my 0.02.
      You have a wonderful day. Best wishes. Deas Plant.

  • @nekomatajs
    @nekomatajs 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That green pin 1,1/2 shackle sure held up.

  • @KurNorock
    @KurNorock 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why would you put the soft shackle directly on the big ass piece of steel with sharp edges?

    • @nocoolname32
      @nocoolname32 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      because someone out there has also done it in a real world situation. put it through their safety chain hole or something dumb like that.

  • @Brandon-ps7nq
    @Brandon-ps7nq 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    FYI, 22mm or 24mm Amsteel blue will have a minimum break strength higher(37,000kg and 44,000kg respectively) than your 19mm "rated"(really should be called under rated) shackle.

  • @garybiggs9010
    @garybiggs9010 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    The metal shackles were not rigged properly. The shackle bolt needs to go through a bored square bar or a heavy wall square tube at a minimum. You put the heavy testing shackle loop against the test shackle bolt which created a single point of load bearing.

    • @818pudge
      @818pudge 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wouldn't it be the same it a real life instance? A single point?

    • @MikeBaxterABC
      @MikeBaxterABC 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Nope ... Shackles are used (and intended to be used) exactly as they tested them.

    • @Hammerjockeyrepair
      @Hammerjockeyrepair 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why?! They did the test the way they did and still the shackles all performed over their ratings. Whats the issue here?

    • @imchris5000
      @imchris5000 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      they had it correct the only real wrong way to use them is to load side to side of the bolt

  • @marktate3431
    @marktate3431 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting test .. and at least to me you proved a good safety point, unrated shackles of any sort are a safety risk..... nothing to do with brand.

  • @jerrybobteasdale
    @jerrybobteasdale 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I suspect the soft shackles have too many realistic drawbacks. If they're aged in the sun, they probably seriously deteriorate. They abrade easily. How do they perform when wet with water or gasoline or oil? The metal shackle is the one to rely on.

    • @barlow2976
      @barlow2976 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      My soft shackles are all UV proof. They don't abrade if you take care not to use them on sharp edges, or get grit in the weave. They perform 100% with water, and float. I don't use them for lifting, just pulling, where I prefer them to steel. Horses for courses.

  • @justinmusselman1257
    @justinmusselman1257 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    everyone else here came to watch this for learning or comparison purposes but i just wanted to see stuff break

  • @pauld2672
    @pauld2672 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I think the unrated shackles are ok in the larger sizes, after all how many of you actually have vehicles that weigh 4.5 tonnes?

    • @Weetbix1969
      @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      the vehicle may not weigh that much but pulling forces can be very high if it is stuck. i have helped on investigations where people have died because they didnt use the correct shackle

    • @johndough9187
      @johndough9187 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I do.

    • @clivehorridge
      @clivehorridge 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Weetbix1969
      Correct, a snatch on a bogged 3.5 tonne vehicle can generate a spiked force of 20 tonnes with ease...

  • @spanky522
    @spanky522 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh no!! I don't want to be sent to the naughty corner, do you?!!

  • @georgecurtis6463
    @georgecurtis6463 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why was the unrated shackle purposefully smaller than the yellow rated one ?

  • @codymoncrief8478
    @codymoncrief8478 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I prefer weld-on rings personally. 10-ton ones can be had very cheap and if welded correctly, last a lifetime.

    • @MikeBaxterABC
      @MikeBaxterABC 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      So every time you have to attach a ring for a recovery op, you bring your welder along?

    • @codymoncrief8478
      @codymoncrief8478 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MikeBaxterABC as in "welded to the bumper before you use them". You hook stuff to them, like chains and straps and winch cables. However, while typing, i assume you mean for connecting cables or straps mid-span. At which point, the clevis pin style from tractor supply/ insdustrial stores are a bit stronger/cheaper, if a not bit ugly. At that much, I just have a couple feet of chain at the end of my winch cable, so I can wrap it around things without adding a strap to the equation. It's an old army method -or maybe I'm just cheap and old fashioned...

    • @MikeBaxterABC
      @MikeBaxterABC 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@codymoncrief8478 That makes sense! :) .. was kidding that you used them in place of shackles :) ...

    • @codymoncrief8478
      @codymoncrief8478 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MikeBaxterABC although, I could bring my welder and do that anyway to make a statement...

  • @js9014
    @js9014 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How should we break this shackle? Lets put it on a bigger shackle!!

  • @jeffr1469
    @jeffr1469 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What’s the brand name of the yellow one?

  • @CliveWebbAustralia
    @CliveWebbAustralia 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can you tell me please what brand is the soft shackle...

    • @Joseph-kb8vp
      @Joseph-kb8vp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bubba rope makes nice ones

    • @tfsupp
      @tfsupp 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      they were not intended for this purpose and are not a shackle, dont use in this application

    • @DropShotMaster1000
      @DropShotMaster1000 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tfsupp Maybe they want to Use it for off road recovery??

    • @Weetbix1969
      @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      if you are going to get any soft fiber rope like that made get it done in something like dynex as if the y break they dont recoil and a hell of a lot stronger. have seen a 16mm dynex rope break the chassis of a 51Tn truck before it broke the rope

    • @consaka1
      @consaka1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm suspicious they made it themselves. The head should not have deformed down to nothing if it was made properly.

  • @randyanderson8557
    @randyanderson8557 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like either the shackle pocket is too wide for the upper shackle, or the bolt is not the right diameter. Try adding washers to the outside of the upper shackle so it fits up in there snug.
    Where did you get the shackle mounts?

  • @MrFreddywise1
    @MrFreddywise1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    in all fairness the rated shackle held until the pin broke so can't see how you can compare that with a much smaller shackle of different metal, an hardware broke ( unrated ) shackles are rated just not to be used for anything other that use on trailer hitch chains ... not unlike the rated shackle which would be used on machinery etc ....

  • @AirCrash1
    @AirCrash1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just use climbing rope, non stretch, can handle crazy loads, been in my cab for years, zero risk for all the spectators that usually hang around when you are trying to drag something off the beach.

    • @Weetbix1969
      @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      climbing rope only has a 5 to 10 year life as it can biodegrade over time especially in higher UV conditions like inside vehicles

    • @AirCrash1
      @AirCrash1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Weetbix1969 real life results trump Google results

    • @Weetbix1969
      @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AirCrash1 i was a chain and rigging certifier for 9 1/2 years and also specialised in wire ropes and height safety gear so i do know what i am talking about like if you want good climbing rope buy Aussie or New Zealand made stuff as it has a 10 year life and EU standard rope only has a 5 year life because its not made for high UV conditions

    • @Weetbix1969
      @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      and climbing rope does stretch. if you want good rope get dynex dyneema rope

    • @AirCrash1
      @AirCrash1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am a sailor spend 24hrs 7 days a week using ropes to handle tons of force. Not some jobber. I use the best rope for sailing and for shifting stuff stuck in the sand I use an old climbing rope. If I had to replace rope according to "standards" I would be bankrupt by now, you learn by experience if you want to actually do shit and not just talk about it. I suppose if you're in the money making business you have to cover your ass but that aint living.

  • @KarasCyborg
    @KarasCyborg 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tell me about dry rot and its effect on stowed soft shackles. Were those Grade 8 Bolts?

  • @sjc2965
    @sjc2965 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4.75T WLL is lifting, recovery is double that. 9.5T recovery load limit.

    • @Weetbix1969
      @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      effectively you could as safety factor for pulling is 2 to 1 not the 4 to 1 for lifting but WLL means work load limit regardless of how you are using it

    • @caerleon87
      @caerleon87 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Total bollocks... You need to get your head around the definitions of "pulling" and "lifting" which you clearly DO NOT understand..

  • @nicholashu9854
    @nicholashu9854 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You remind me of Theon Greyjoy

  • @bthemedia
    @bthemedia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    please TURN DOWN THE MUSIC so we can hear what he SAID

  • @nminty7485
    @nminty7485 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    With proper rigging there should never be anything flying at your head 😑

    • @InvestorAcademyPodca
      @InvestorAcademyPodca 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      There shouldn't, but it does happen. That's why you don't stand next to a recovery either, stuff shouldn't happen but it does.

    • @rasta77-x7o
      @rasta77-x7o 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      But bogans on the beaches using tow balls means things do fly at peoples heads.

  • @grindstone4910
    @grindstone4910 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    "This broke 7 times over the working load limit!" That's... how a WLL works...
    The fuck are these guys

  • @swashington942
    @swashington942 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why was I not surprised at the outcome? Lol

  • @thedoctor2102
    @thedoctor2102 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How about testing a couple of marine industry shackles, ?

  • @tfsupp
    @tfsupp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I always try not to be negative on comments, but this video is misleading and dangerous for the average joe.
    This is not a proper test and don't tell me it is just because it was at a NATA lab, they just test each item and would never agree to this comparison.
    The so called soft shackle are nothing more than a single sided monkey (ball) sling (really just a strop) should not even be considered as a shackle its nylon sling and these often snap without any indication of yeald once the limit of stretch is reached. any way who in their right mind would trust the friction on the ball to stop it slipping.
    The quality shackle is not surprising to have failed at seven times its rating but now where usable. When I use to test shackles we had to test at 2 times the rating (safe working limit) without any deformation and fully functional for repeat tests etc, and for very special jobs we tested to 3 times with out any deformation. Testing it to destruction is very miss leading some people will think they can easily exceed the limit.
    YOU SHOULD NOT DISCUSS ANY THING YOU KNOW LITTLE ABOUT and in fact a couple of minutes research on google would have told you how bad this review is and why you should not have done it.

    • @jackking5567
      @jackking5567 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's nothing but a marketing scam - an advertisement.
      The testing is pure nonsense as you have explained brilliantly.

    • @MsSomeonenew
      @MsSomeonenew 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't know if your eyeballs came straight from an ebay fire sale, but they had 3 tests with the soft shackle and 3 times it showed very clear failure indication before letting go.
      Meanwhile the metal shackles had almost none.

    • @tfsupp
      @tfsupp 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MsSomeonenew i respectfull want to let you know in my personal opinion you are not only wrong but should not open your trap unless you realy do know what you are talking about. 1/ Steel always shows deformation before failure and if you had even the slighest knowledge of working with steel you would know that. 2/ notice i said the nylon strop/sling would fail without notice at the end of its elasticity or stretch and unless you can calculate all the variables for each and ever manufactured sling or you have some mystical insight that no one else in the world has as to when the point of stretch finishes and the falure occures for each and every sling, your assumption is totally rubbish. (A couple of strands breaking early isnot pre notice its already failed)
      Sorry but i have worked with both these materials for over 40 years and have the suitable qualification so please feel free to demonstrate where I'm wrong using real science and facts. Good luck.
      Sorry to be a bit rough on you but i suppect you may have a reason to defend the unsafe sling that would not be allowed in any rigging application.

  • @veganpotterthevegan
    @veganpotterthevegan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's a really small, unrated shackle. Plenty are bigger and can easily handle what most people need

  • @reuk
    @reuk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm surprised soft shackles are rated to its MBS

  • @nazairetetreault181
    @nazairetetreault181 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this a s or m shackle

  • @TLSCHIN51
    @TLSCHIN51 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay next time by the same size of shackle from the hardware store cuz they sell them that size to your pairing apples to oranges don't say one size will only hold the way you can buy the same size as a shackle that you had the yellow at the hardware store and black and it will do the same thing

  • @charliedee9276
    @charliedee9276 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shackle broke at 38,822 lbs. Not too bad.

  • @TLSCHIN51
    @TLSCHIN51 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    After reading people's reviews down here they're saying the same thing you're showing a smaller one against the bigger one that's like trying to drink through a straw and then trying to drink through a regular straw

  • @eduardosantiago6414
    @eduardosantiago6414 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Porque esos textos tan grandes y altos ?no dejan ver

  • @stewartross1233
    @stewartross1233 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video but do we need the loud incessant inane music!

  • @wonderfuldaywithyou
    @wonderfuldaywithyou 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Green pin shackle is the best.

    • @brianjensen5200
      @brianjensen5200 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      They're Nobles brand, green pin and blue pin. They're very cheap too if you buy from nobles

    • @wonderfuldaywithyou
      @wonderfuldaywithyou 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brianjensen5200 country of origin is important in my industry. Made in China is not preferred.
      The blue pin looks like made in China. Am i correct?

    • @Weetbix1969
      @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wonderfuldaywithyou the colour means squat all these days as manufacturers make them all sorts of colours so it cant always be relied upon. some Chinese ones are blue but can also be yellow pin but so can some from other countries. i have seen green, blue, yellow, orange, red and even black pins in shackles as well as plain galvanised rated ones. nobles australia do do some nice shackles up to around 1,500 Ton with a 360mm main pin

  • @makattak88
    @makattak88 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Soft shackles don't seem very secure...

    • @tfsupp
      @tfsupp 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      they were not intended for this purpose and are not a shackle, dont use in this aplication

    • @makattak88
      @makattak88 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes they are for sailing. I have a hard time trusting them.

  • @Peto093
    @Peto093 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    soft shackle should be rated 4000kg rather than 8000

    • @Weetbix1969
      @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @CheckAvability most equipment for pulling only has a 2 to 1 safety factor

  • @BubbaRope
    @BubbaRope 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The soft shackle that came apart at the knot is NOT acceptable. It happens because the soft shackle was not pre-tightened by machine. Beware of these type of non-pre-tightened soft shackles. All BR synthetic shackles are pre-tighened to over 12k lbs. before they shipped. Remember the design of the shackle is just as important as what they are made from. Be safe out there.

  • @MikeBaxterABC
    @MikeBaxterABC 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks!! ... I've worked as a rigger and crane signalman and frankly i did not even KNOW there were unrated shackles made :( ... I must have 30 or more shackles squirrelled away in the basement here adds there :) ... If I find any unmarked/unrated ones I will throw them out!

    • @pocketchange3543
      @pocketchange3543 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You should be fired! How can you even call yourself a rigger if you didn't know shackles need to be stamped with their load rating. You should have noticed if you were inspecting your equipment before any lift (which is required by law by OSHA) and your boss should be fined if not sued for not training you properly. I've seen very bad things happen when incompetence runs wild.

    • @MikeBaxterABC
      @MikeBaxterABC 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pocketchange3543 Interesting commentary and very good points ... but you took my comment kinda the wrong way ... EVERY time I'm on a job I inspect the rigging gear (I'm the guy who will torch a cable sling if it's frayed or damaged for example) .. and yes check the shackle for it's rated load and any deformation (one check is if the SCREW pin is easy to thread in and out if it BINDS it may have been over loaded) ... the fact is I never just never saw a shackle without its proper load rating and manufacture mark etc on it before this video ... if I found an unmarked one on the job, I can imagine I 'd of just thrown it out (and put the pin in my pocket to throw in a separate bin) .. thanks for keeping up the proper procedures on the job BTW!

    • @pocketchange3543
      @pocketchange3543 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MikeBaxterABC glade to hear I miss understood your comment. I apologize. I've seen a lot of hacks over the years, unfortunately some on the crew I work with.

    • @MikeBaxterABC
      @MikeBaxterABC 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pocketchange3543 Been there! :( .. i stopped a lift once, where the guy stuck a piece or re-rod in the shackle (like a foot long) because he lost the pin and "couldn't wait" :(

    • @carsnanidiot
      @carsnanidiot 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good for you! here in Norway i have NEVER seen any marked shackels. buy the biggest that fit.

  • @gittyupalice96
    @gittyupalice96 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    yeah let me tell ya, the frame on 90% of vehicles would tear in half before that yellow shackle breaks lol. If your lucky your full frame (body on frame) vehicle has 3/16" thick steel, much weaker than this guy. Probably 1/2" or 3/4" A36 round stock thats been put through some sort of heat treatment process + work hardening of forming the shackle shape makes it incredibly much stronger than a car frame.

  •  5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Uuu shackel shackel nananananananaa

  • @mikecasey6983
    @mikecasey6983 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    the bolt is what broke not the shackle so retest with a stronger bolt or weld the eye piece ends on both shackles but hook them before you weld them to a solid block that will fit in your fittings with the least amount of movement and pull on them ... i mean yes i do realize that welding will distort the metal but for real how much would it change that thick of metal🧐 i would like to see this kind of test performed thanks for the vid interesting to watch👍

  • @imchris5000
    @imchris5000 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I dont trust the soft shackles because they can come apart when bouncing and jerking on the straps

  • @reecehemmings8635
    @reecehemmings8635 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here i am thinking this crap was breaking at 3.5ton and hes recommending it to me.... i was clearly mistaken

  • @wildwoody20
    @wildwoody20 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was always told soft shackles are stronger than any metal shackle

    • @davidsirmons
      @davidsirmons 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depends on what they're made of. Dyneema D12 Max 99, at 17mm, if you braid like 2 of them together, would be able to hold 2x as much as the yellow steel shackle. One 17mm rope of it holds 38,100 kg (83,820lbs)

  • @matthewhapp8688
    @matthewhapp8688 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    giving that kind of advice on the soft shackle as it is frayed to f%#k not good what are you thinking if i see you out there stranded ill wave to you

  • @mathewmolk2089
    @mathewmolk2089 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just where are you going to find a "4x4" that can generate that kind of force. - The M80 tank retriever has it's on shackles so don't worry about using that "soft shackle"
    Don't know what you are, but I'll tell you what you aint. = An Ironworker, Rigger, or Millwright.

  • @KrisDebell
    @KrisDebell 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    that beast of a machine used to test it! fuck comparison vids! reverse press tube channel!!!

  • @lumaplays3287
    @lumaplays3287 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Next time add water to the Rope it would make it more dense and more harder to tear

    • @Weetbix1969
      @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      depends on what the rope is made of, some do not absorb or are affected by water

  • @nategibbons172
    @nategibbons172 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You do NOT use once any of them has suffered damage...

  • @davesmith2733
    @davesmith2733 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dum to test different size shackles ...cheap v expensive same size please

  • @lindapigram6521
    @lindapigram6521 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    this video totally misses the point the reason steel shackles can be dangerous is not because they break its because whatever they are attached to fails and they become a lethal missile whereas soft shackles dont

  • @qb6025
    @qb6025 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:14 wrong knot: ends should been buried

  • @kolsen6330
    @kolsen6330 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How about testing a real CROSBY shackle against a chinese counterfeit? The chinese usually fails at half the rated capacity from what I have read.

    • @barlow2976
      @barlow2976 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don't the U.S government test imports before allowing sale? Here in Europe all imports have to undergo safety tests before being granted safety certificates. Whenever I buy any rated product the online retailer send me the safety certificate, usually valid for 6 months. Cheap counterfeits such as phone chargers sometimes slip through the system, but I've never heard of counterfeit shackles here in the U.K. I just can't imagine a lifting/rigging firm buying shackles without a test certificate, just not worth the risk.

    • @rasta77-x7o
      @rasta77-x7o 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just because China can make cheap shit doesn't mean they can't make good shit, heck DJI is awesome.
      Same story as stuff made anywhere, you get what you pay for!

  • @robertw1871
    @robertw1871 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hard to beat steel, used and proven for over a hundred years and used millions of times a day in ultra heavy industry…. Rope is amazing, but can’t be trusted for repeat use over years due to the wear factor…

  • @desolatesurfer8651
    @desolatesurfer8651 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    As if I didn't know.

  • @tomthompson7400
    @tomthompson7400 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lifting gear for plant etc has a 5 to 1 safety rating ,,, why are you surprised ,,, its 12 to 1 for lifting people ,,, that un rated shackle was little more than a keyring , hardly a fair test as for your soft shackle , its a rope with a knot ,,, so why pay 25 bucks for a bit of old rope ,,,

    • @Weetbix1969
      @Weetbix1969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      metallic lifting equipment like chains, hooks and rings etc has a 4 to 1 safety factor and fiber strops are 7 to 1 (international standards) i was a chain and rigging certifier also specialising in wire ropes and height safety equipment for 9 1/2 years as a certifier and another 8 years wire rope specialist and splicer before that and also trained in height rescue. the rope also is not just normal rope these days there are lots of specialist ropes. dynex for instance can pull a 51Tn truck with a 16mm rope and if it brakes is designed not to recoil so it wont come back at you and kill you. you are right about the unrated shackles though and the amount i saw people using them in professional lifting applications was disgusting. and they wounder why they bent or broke.

  • @michaelfritsche4023
    @michaelfritsche4023 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Crosby

  • @jockmiller3056
    @jockmiller3056 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good review. don’t need the stupid music 😎