I Tried 'The Last of Us: Part 1' on PC to see if it's THAT bad... [4K]
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
- Check out Apex Gaming PC's here: apexpartner.ap...
🔴 My Stream: linktr.ee/luke...
💻 2nd Channel: / @lukestephenslive
👾 My Discord Server: / discord
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Last of Us Part I is a 2022 action-adventure game developed by Naughty Dog and published by Sony Interactive Entertainment. A remake of the 2013 game The Last of Us, it features revised gameplay, including enhanced combat and exploration, and expanded accessibility options.
My TLOU Pt. 2 Critique: • The Last of Us: Part I...
My TLOU Pt. 1 Critique: • The Last of Us | The U...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe and I'll be your bestest friend!
#thelastofus #playstation #ps5
![[🔴LIVE] งานประกาศรางวัล MAYA TV AWARDS 2024 : มายามหาชน](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nwmWYXXVwBY/mqdefault.jpg)
Check out Apex Gaming PC's to get a great PC from a company that takes real pride in their work: apexgamingpcs.com/products/luke-stephens
More like APE S*X
can you ask playstation about Bloodborne pc port cause i really miss the game or an Infamous port
No
i paid for the game and it doesn't even let me open it, it says insufficient ram and video memory despite my graphics card being better than the one in the minimum requirements. The ram is 8gb only but it runs even re4 remake on the highest setting possible with 30 fps so why block me from opening a game i paid for lemme run it and see it for myself
@@Jonathanainsley69 just refund it.
Luke: "For me runs perfect I don't see why so many negative reviews"
*Nasa's backup computer at his right hand running the game and preparing to take off*
Yeah, even at it the levels load like 5+ mins, so what it'd be on a standart one pc
@@cheap_clips One crazy thing is that other games with the same graphics details runs perfectly in PC with 4GB VRAM including Horizon, GoW, Days Gone and Uncharted. It's like they want us to change our PC for just this game.
He's out of touch.
Most people complaining its because there system sorry to say that but that is the issue. This type of games as good as they look they run ok only with monster pc's if you are really pushing the eye candy and of top of that you can mix the horrible port lol.
yeah, he cant compare when he has the top 1% gpu on the market atm lmao
The shader compilation process itself is generally performed on the CPU, not the GPU and only then once complied are the shaders are used by your GPU. Thats why your CPU usage was at 100%. So it really doesn't matter that you have a RTX 4090 GPU at least as far as time to compile the shaders is concerned.
Actual gigachad information
Thx Chad, you're most certainly correct.
My CPU and GPU were both pegged. And it wasn't from anything else I was running.
That's true but his CPU is in the same range as 4090 so it's pretty bad
@@Tameot34 He should just let GF Exp set the right settings.
The editor is criminal for the sound replacement on sarah's death. im laughing so fucking hard
Honestly, Editor needs the punishment of the wrath of the negative review mob
This should be a federal crime😂
They made this port as bad as possible to take heat off of the show.
Replace her voice with Arnold Schwarzeneggers voice. Arrrgh arrrrrrgh 🤣
@@joebenson528 what heat? It was a huge commercial and critical success.
Remember that people need to apply for refunds before the 2h mark. Compiling shaders for over half that time is insane.
They've done it on purpose. They can't be this incompetent.
Here's the deal if they don't have a shader compilation step people will complain that it stutters but if they do people will complain that it's too long at the end the devs can never win. Id much rather deal with shader compilation step rather than stutter, and shader compilation will only get longer until Computer Scientists and Computer Graphics experts find a way to eliminate shader compilation
@@randomyoutubeuser8509 You do realize that Shader Compilation takes about 1 minute? Games like Elden Ring take about 30 seconds to compile shaders on my 3060 Ti and Elden Ring looks waaaay better than this badly optimized VRAM eater and even if you compile those shaders, you would still stutter a lot with a 8 GB card on high settings at 1080p.
and loading times on top of that. ps5 loads in seconds, pc takes MINUTES
@@randomyoutubeuser8509 It stutters plenty even with the shaders compiled.
"The last VRAM of us". That review had me in stitches, I'm not gonna lie hahaha.
How did you get hurt?
@@joebenson528 🐒
@@joebenson528 monkey
@@joebenson528 🐒
you mean the crash of us
I think it's another example of why shader compilation should be an added task to the game installation workflow. Sure, it will take longer to finish the installation of games that require it, but you're not forcing your players to occupy their primary display with a game they shouldn't play for a long stretch of time, especially when they ultimately launched the game because they wanted to play it right now. Idk about you guys, but I don't launch new games in anticipation of shader compilation taking so much time that I will need that to run it while I do something else and come back to my PC later. Is this user-error? Partly, but I do think this is an indication that something needs to improve here.
@@drakeizatt While you are correct, there are more creative solutions than what you are describing, such as a seperate executable that would not require any input from the user and could scale utilization based on other apps' needs. Pie-in-the-sky, perhaps, but harder problems have been solved in the gaming space, and this is directly and indirectly affecting the bottom line of companies if poor reviews due to user-error are impacting sales, which they no doubt are.
Shader compilation should be MANDATORY before playing any game.
And some do: You won't be able to play them if the shader didn't compile.
It was actually what happened for me when I played Horizon Zero Dawn for the first time. I just went on doing some works, clean my room, make a little snack and play some games on my phone while the shader was compiling. And once it was done, I just had a blast playing the game and kinda forgot about all the time I was waiting. I guess it's like removing a bandaid. It's quite painful but then you forget about it.
@@ainanomena9276 I don't disagree - I usually can spare 5-10 minutes prior to playing a game for shaders to compile. What I am getting at here is that there is not enough preventative measures to starting a game without compiled shaders. As games increase in complexity and resolution, while old/slow hardware is introduced to games like this likely due to poor price/performance in new hardware, shader compilation may take an hour or two for the average gaming rig in a few years. If we're having this problem already with a game that likely takes 30 minutes to an hour for the average gaming rigs, this issue will only exacerbate over time.
@@drakeizatt Well the shaders are stored in a cache on the harddrive and then sent to the GPU and held in the VRAM which is why you only need to sit through a long shader compilation screen like that once when you first boot up the game for the first time, technically you could install shaders during the initial installation but the problem is that on PC every one has different drivers and different system configurations. This why the game needs to run before the shaders are compiled for the first time, it also allows you to take advantage of game ready drivers.
I haven't seen something so tragic since Joel went on a date with a golf club
Yeah but the golf club smashes heads, this game melts the cpu
😂
At least you can get some enjoyment from a golf club. There was no enjoyment with part 2.
*Background music*
Luke: "This will never stop being really difficult to watch"
Me: *Spits out water*
@@jake51515 I would say that's a matter of opinion.
I love how luke was saying you can never watch Sarah's death scene without getting emotional and Jacob comes in with the comedy music over the top completely killing the tone 😂
Love the channel you guys do great work!
IT WAS SO FUNNY HAHAHA
You can. It's sad, sure, but it's certainly not a "you WILL cry during this".
Comedy music? Jesus am I now that old that the Banjo Kazooie music is now completely unknown to young gamers? 🥲
@@JSAiKO omfg no way 😂 my apologies I'm 29 I should know that!
Never had a n64 as a kid so banjo is completely alien to me 😂
TLDR: You SHOULD NOT be buying this. Just because my supercomputer was able to run it ok after 15 minutes does not mean that the value proposition for the average consumer is good. Steer clear until they fix these issues. Furthermore, some people are reporting bugs and glitches, and while I didn't have any, it's possible you might. To be safe, just wait and save your money.
This needs like 6GB VRAM for 1080p minimum settings, 8+ on 1080p medium
RAM usage easily goes up to 20+ GB
I dunno man, I have a mid-range PC and run it at a constant 80fps on High with no issues. This seems like a consumer-side issue.
Just pirate bro
aye aye
I have a 3060ti and a AMD Rysen 5 5600x with 32GB of RAM. Will this run okay or would u say wait for patches?
I genuinely cried laughing at the copyright music work around.
Gets only 100 fps on the most expensive piece of tech on the planet earth: "it's not that bad"
*consumer tech, to be fair
Honestly i was seriously thinking on spending 1800€ that i've made during my summertime employment to upgrade to a 4090 from a 1080 because i haven't touched any GPU's for almost 8 years now but seeing how many unoptimized games are coming out, an upgrade like that seems like the dumbest thing to do right now.
@@GRGCompletionist check your cooling and power supply when you update to a 4090.
Big chance you already know that. But just to be sure
@@DovahVokuna yeah i know, i'll be needing a new PSU for sure because the one i have right now is a 750W. Not sure about the cooling though. The one i have is a H80i v2 liquid cooler right now.
@@GRGCompletionist good. About the cooling. I would ask a expert just to be sure. Not familiar with the one you have. Take care buddy.
I had a really funny glitch were people suddenly were completely wet. Like right out of a pool. Noticed it first with Joel and the it was really funny when it happened to Robert because it looked like he was really nervous and sweating a lot from seeing Joel and Tess
You can disable black bars in cutscenes for ultrawide in display settings -> ultrawide pillarboxes -> minimal
10:54 i thought i was the only one that missed carpet. I LOVE carpet and don’t mind the upkeep. The cozy feeling of taking off your shoes and digging your toes in. I’m with ya Luke.
Do you not have socks on
I have upstairs carpet and I don't go upstairs because my family sleeps up there but it's amazing
i used to do cable... and whenever i was at a home(clean) with carpet i would just sit on the floor....sometimes lay while i waited for dispatch to answer the phone
I lived in a house with carpetting everywhere but the kitchen and bathroom floors for 20+ years, then I moved into a place that has zero carpetting anywhere. I miss carpets
@@digitalbarrito3555 whaaaat in the UK we have carpet everywhere as standard. Except the kitchen and bathroom basically
Im so surprised considering their track record with pretty amazing ports and this is their biggest franchise. I was really waiting for this one too.
was this port even developed by naughty dog?
my theory is they're forced to release the game waaay earlier then it should be to accompany the show. Looks like it needs a longer delay.
To clarify this point, this was done by Iron Galaxy. The incompetent chads behind the sloppy port of Arkham Knight, Origins (still has a game breaking bug to this day), and also did both Uncharted Collection & The Last Of Us Part 1. As this group was picked to port and manage, I don't expect fixes to come in anytime soon. It is definitely on Naughty Dog and Sony for contracting this porting project to them.
Any delay is usually a bad sign
@@CommanderNam no
I must take back my initial good impressions. After roughly 1.5 hour of flawless gameplay the game started crashing on me hardly. It sometimes even takes down the whole system with it. It crashes consistently after few - call it 10 - minutes of playtime.
What is your specs?
@@Espen_1995 3950X, 64GB , 3080 FE, 4k&60, DSL Balanced
Took me 2 hours to build shaders on a 2070 Super with an i7-7700 intel processor, ridiculously long wait.
Game was running decently for me in the 2 hours i played afterwards, not a single crash. Was playing on high settings, did get some fps drops below 60 depending on the area I was in.
Having just finished playing the Resident Evil 4 Remake prior, I have to say the difference performance wise is night & day. If RE4 runs smooth on my rig, there is no excuse for TLOU to run so poorly.
How did you manage to play it on high?!! I have 3070, i7-11700k, 32GB ram and can barely play it low-med, nearly capped VRAM.
@@majdingjeqari2448 No idea, my cpu was at 90% the whole time though which is pretty insane.
18:11 The Wilhelm scream during the explosion, lol. (I am glad, that I play my games on console. I don’t care about high frame rate too much and I don’t have to wait 2 hours to compile shaders.)
Your editor is a legend.
“Runs fine for me! All it takes is $5000 worth of kit.”
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it!
Luke, you are playing WITH the patch.
Horizons PC port was not great on launch, the Uncharted Collection still has bad mouse controls and limited options and enhancements but The Last Of Us Part 1 is on a whole other level.
Exactly. He leaves out that context. I bought HZD on day 1 and had many crashes and bugs. Fortunately I haven't got Uncharted/TLOU and probably ever won't.
You have probably one of the best PCs that you can get right now so it's not surprising that you aren't having any issues.
I waited an hour for shader compilation and then got into the game and realized that despite having a 2070 super and an above recommended specs CPU, I can barely play the game with full medium settings at 1440p with DLSS on. So I even lowered it to 1080p, downscaled it to 720p, and was still having insane stuttering/freezing whilst barely managing 60fps, this all while lowering the more demanding settings which just made the game visually look worse than the PS3 version. My CPU at all times is pretty much maxing out at 100% no matter the combination of settings I use, so something is really hogging the CPU when it shouldn't be - not to mention CPU temps are going through the roof.
For the most part I get what you're saying but this narrative that's starting to arise about how *most* people aren't waiting for shaders to compile is just frustrating. It's annoying that the "top negative" reviews are literally from people who probably didn't wait, because myself and many others have written pretty detailed reviews about the issues after a few hours of playtime and are pushed pretty far down.
He's running a Intel i9-12900KF 16-Core and RTX 4090. He basically has a $4000 PC. Of course it's going to run well. It would be shocking if it didnt.
I got pretty much the reccomended specs to run the game; 2070 Super, Ryzen 5 3600, 16gig ram and been having the exact same problem you had; major stutters from the CPU load and RAM usage. Although, i have not waited the shaders to compile due to a tight refund window on steam in case i wanted to refund it.
Does waiting for the shader compile fix the problems you were having or is it futile and better to just wait for a hotfix? I still would like to have an opportunity to refund if i want to.
@@Alpacalips It's one of those things. If he had a lower tier PC - around the mid-range mark that he could try it on he's see what people are talking about
@@ryod8064 I never played it without waiting for shaders to compile so I'm not entirely sure how bad it could be without them - but I imagine that it's bad. I'd wait for a hotfix/patch though. The issues I listed were happening AFTER shader compilation, so maybe it would go away for you but for me these issues are very much prevalent, even after trying some fixes people have suggested. It's an optimisation problem
@@Alpacalips Also the frame dips, at times it went from 118 to 90 in minute 14. He didn't notice but imagine playing at 60fps then it drops to 30 or lower. That's a huge dip
the only problem I had and still have with the last of us on pc is the mouse stutter, I haven't had a single crash or bug happen, I run the game at 120 - 180 fps constant on all ultra settings too. sure the shaders took me 20 minutes to load but I just watched youtube with it in the background and didn't worry about it. I just hope they fix the mouse stuttering soon because I really don't want to have to play through the entire game with controller
Me too. I'm so disappointed. I own it on ps5 and played it with a controller already. I was really excited to play with mouse and keyboard and it sadly is jittery as hell when I pan the mouse. Framerate doesn't seem to matter. And I have 13900k and 4090.
That wilhelms scream at 18:13 😂
The problem here is that many people doesn't have a rtx4090 GPU 16core CPU, there could be bigger problems with a gtx 1070 ti and 8 core CPU maybe, it would be awesome to test it on some "more regular" hardware instead of highend nasa level PCs
It’s not aliasing issues, it’s V-sync.
In most cases instead of having screen tearing due to V-Sync being off the tearing will sometimes be at the top of the screen causing the rippling effect.
I suspected that waiting for the shaders to be compiled was the way to go, but I launched it anyway, bc there's no way it takes so long. Even without that, I also had crashes like the one in the main menu (and another one in-game, but the shaders weren't finished.
waited almost 2 hours for the shaders to compile, crashed many times while compiling in the main menu, but no problem for me after the shaders were done compiling. Been enjoying the game :)
Luke highlighting over Terra Nil and then asking "Yeah but has anything NEW come out?" is so perfectly emblematic of his entire value system lol
Jeez, I’ve only had my pc for about 4 years and waiting for shaders is just a habit for me now. I install a game, start it up, and go do something for 30 minutes just in case there are shaders I gotta wait for. I thought everyone did this but I guess not 😂
It’s one thing to compile shaders, but it’s another one to see it take this long and go over the 2-hour mark and pretty much prevent people from refunding due to optimisation.
Horizon did launch with a rough state which people did forget! Shaders took for me, at the time, 15 minutes.
IronGalaxy simply can’t port games to PC but they made some miracles for the Switch. And it’s a shame since they’ve been in rough times with Rumbleverse. We don’t know how much of the team is still there after the Arkham Knight PC debacle, but one thing is sure:
No one should have to buy a PC as expensive as Luke’s to play this game and have it run at reasonable performances.
As the old late TB said: Stop preordering video games!
You don’t have to. You’re exaggerating. No one said you have to MAX out games. That’s stupid. Every game on PC needs a specific hardware for it to work to its full potential. It’s an option. Like TF2. I don’t have all its options maxed out. I don’t care. And it’s an old game.
For instance, Doom 2019 needs just a 4GB Vram to be maxed out, but the new STALKER game needs 10GB of Vram, what are you going to do, go out and spend a bit for a graphic card with 12GB, or are you just going to use what you have? Exactly. Use what you have.
As long as you can play it smoothly, that’s all that matters.
@@sO_RoNerY considering this game focuses a lot on graphical aspects, I do think that it matters, you don’t really get the same immersive experience when the graphics are meh.
20:14
“This scene will never stop to be dificult to watch”
Fax, i cant stop laughing
For me the big issue is vram usage. I only have an 8GB card and I have to run textures at medium, which quite frankly makes the environment looks pretty soft. It just seems like for the quality of textures it shouldn't take up so much ram. Along with this, there's also a memory leak that causes the game to, unsurprisingly, crash after playing for too long assuming it fills up your vram. You can fix this with a older version of a DLL, but that shouldn't be necessary. It still doesn't fix the very high VRAM usage.
I think this could be because the PS5 essentially has 16GB of vram as all of its system memory, and Iron Galaxy didn't make the port utilize PCs generally slower system ram properly. Instead they just load it all into vram.
The game works fine when going over the VRAM limit its probably some kind of bug since for me its not crashing or affecting fps. The game says its using 10 gb of vram while my gpu only has 6 gb
@@MalteK is it on 🔥 yet? How do you do it? How many system Ram you have?
@@musicamusicamusica2944 it works fine after 7 hours i just go over the limit comfirm the settings and start playing i have 6 gb Vram
@@MalteK How about the temperature?
And you are playing on low settings?
@@musicamusicamusica2944 the temps are fine nothing over normal and i am maxed out at 1080p, my specs are rx 5600 xt, Ryzen 5 3600xt and 16 gb 3200 mhz cl 16 ram
"works fine for me!"
*plays on the best gaming rig possible on the market*
If that's the bar for whether or not a game functions properly no wonder why every port is so garbage now.
I started crashing like an hour in the game now I can’t pass the same spot in the downtown area. Other than that it was running pretty well. 5800x3d, 3080ti 32gb of ram
Is it fixed?
Excellent video as always man, one small correction : Horizon port was not great
Amen
It came out broken, I pre-ordered it, but now (several years later, I know) it runs flawlessly, like new
That pprt was one of the worst I've ever experienced in my life. Utter dogshit.
Took me 3 hours to load shaders, got a 6600xt and I5-9400f, super surprised. One isusue I knoticed that you didn't have was the Please Wait... Screens. Alot if people are having this issue it seems, just a 3min loading screen every 5min.
The bigger real issue is VRAM. Your 4090 has 24GBs, a normal midrange card like a 3060 TI has 8GBs. This game can use a lot.
That's because 8GB vram GPUs should've not been a thing last generation. I have a 5700 with 8GB, and I'm alredy starting to feel it bottlenecking performances in some games. I can't imagine someone with a 3070 and the same amount of VRAM.
@@mondodimotori it’s fast, but you have to play in medium/high. I was at 90 fps on optimized settings but experienced ALOT of crashes, so much so that I refunded the game. First game that has ever pushed the limits of my card.
@mondodimotori Yep, a mid-high tier gpu with 8-10 gigs of vram is a joke, especially if it's $500+, glad i managed to get a reference model rx6800 about 2 years ago, sitting comfortably with 16 gigs of vram and 3070ti performance
I have a 4080 and there's constant stuttering. I have it installed on an M.2 SSD and 32gb ram. I think you are the best example of running the game properly because of your PC.
Bro, just get a 4090. Problem solved. He has a 4090. Did you know he has a 4090? Just get a 4090. He has a 4090.
@@chexmixkitty I uhhh, played the game with a 3080TI and it worked like a dream. Only crashes when I quit to main menu. I have no idea why this port is so broken and weird that people like that guy can't run it better than me, it's absurd, hope they patch this sooner rather than later.
I have a 4090 and 13900k and its jittery as hell when I pan the mouse. Fps low or high doesn't fix it. My brother has a 12900k and 3090 and it runs fine 🤷♂️
Last of us part 1 on pc doubles as a cpu stress test! NICE
When you are building shaders for any game your CPU is at 100%
Now he's starting the video as he walks into the room.
One day he'll start the video as he enters his house...
There is a setting to allow cutscenes to run in ultrawide!!
its crazy because most of sony's ports have been great like days gone playing at 1440p max settings at 200 plus fps and it looks and plays amazing , so im surprised the last of us is preforming this badly , have yet to try it on my rig 5800x3d 7900xtx , will try later hopefully im one of the lucky ones that doesent have to many issues
The difference between a ps4 game port and a ps5 game port.
Except Zero down. That one was terrible
@@teeman7137 It's fine now for the most part.
nitpick: 11:41 that's not ray traced. TLoU on PS5/PC doesn't use RT, they're most probably duplicating geometry, just like for they did for the mirrors.
Actual gameplay starts well after 5:20
Actual gameplay starts in 09:13 lol
@@MrLachapell There is no gameplay, it's just walking in a straight line at a snail's pace while listening to mediocre dialogue for literally the entire video lol
I’ve tested the game in a mid range machine and it runs perfectly fine on 5600x + RTX 3060. Shaders took 20m to compile and I’m willing to accept it as the game runs without hitches on 1440p high on DLSS quality. No crashes, no freezes.
How much vram it uses on the settings you play on? I have 5600(nonx) and rx 6700(nonXT) which is closer to rtx 3060ti in perfomance and has 10gb vram.
@@Marko-ij4vy it used around 10gbs using dlss and 11 gbs on native which I guess makes sense as they’re recommending the 2080ti (that is a 11gb card) to this resolution
to be fair, most people don't really understand what "compiling shaders" really is, they might think it's just unpacking some stuff or things like that, not to mantion it's still kind of a new thing for pc players since most games are ready to play the moment you install it...
Luke should also have a mid-tier pc and show us what most of us would probably experience.
It's insane that this guy can't see the stuttering while panning the camera with the mouse when I can see it in a 60fps TH-cam video
Guys just buy a console, once I put the Last of us Part 1 disc on my PS5, 10 seconds later I was playing the game. I am so glad that I never built a gaming PC and stuck to consoles.
Bruh thats what im saying. On PS5 PT 1 loads in less than 30 seconds. PC is overkill AND the ports dont even work half the time.
i mean good for you to like it on console but i will stay here on pc, granted i don't play this game and have no interest in it considering i've already played it on ps4 back in the day.
I like 100fps. No thanks
For some building shader cache took over two hours.
For me with 5950x, 7900 xtx, 64GB ram and NVME SSD it took over hour and half. After that long loading and got huge stuttering every 20-30 seconds sometimes for second or two.
During compiling game peaked with 25+GB memory ussage.
I played it on a legion slim 7 with an amd 6800h processor, 6600s gpu on high settings and it ran very smooth averaging 70fps. I also want to add that I finished the game without any crashes.
I am not sure what your point is making this video. I installed the game, I waited 20+ minutes for shaders to compile, made it through the Sarah scene to Boston and the game crashed while Joel listened to a conversation between people on the street while following Tess. I gave up for the night and tried the next day after the first patch. I got less than 2 minutes further than before. This time the conversation didn't crash me, the truck blowing up cutscene did. I have a 3080 and a decent CPU, my system was built last year so it's not a relic. You can press X to doubt all you want but the game does not run smoothly for us mere mortals. This is the fourth time I have bought this game now and it ran more reliably on the original PS3 than it does for me on PC.
Game runs awesome for me. Rtx 2070 ryzen 7 3700x 1080p med/high settings. 60fps locked with little dips to 50 at times not even using dlss
This is one of the remasters of all time
It literally isn’t, it’s a remake
@@jasongreen6826 by the absolute most bare minimum terms of what the word means. An actual remake would be resident evil 4 for example.
@@jasongreen6826 they called it a remake but it’s more literally a remaster
On the Steam deck it takes an hour and a half. The Steam refund window is 2 hours
i5 10600 rx 6600 xt 32gb ram
1080p medium
vsync on
most of the time run at 60fps but some time drop to 45
and is disaster
i want my money back
this was complete roberry
Oh man, guess I’m waiting a bit longer to play this for the first time 😂 glad I didn’t buy day 1
same, i wanted to do that but fortunately i waited and got re4 remake instead xd
On my rig it’s running ok-since Hogwartz anything that doesn’t feel like a jittery stuttery mess is good for bough for me
On my 3060ti, it took almost 20 minutes. And the most annoying thing is that, it takes the same time anytime u want to play
The game has been good for me, been playing at around 60 to 80 frames at nearly max settings. Only thing that irritated me was the building shaders thing
Same, but I'm running a 7950X3D and RTX 4090.
Same, only had 1 crash and i'm playing with 70-100fps on a RTX 3060 12gb, i know PC gamers love to cry when they don't get 360fps at minimum, but i'm fine with 70fps and it feels very smooth on a PS5 controller plugged in.
@@Ligmaballinhow due !! I'll get 50-70fps on a rx6600 if you get 70-100fps on a rtx 3060. I even set the graphics to low and the fsr 2.0 to ultra performance, but it still only gets 40-50fps :v
Mine plays great 70-90 fps. 3090ti and 10850k 32 gigs ram.
They need to include shader optimization somehow in the steam installation itself. People don't wanna install a game, boot it up and find out that they gotta wait another hour+ to play it
Skoddskar is goddamn right 27:15
WAIT FOR SHADERS TO FULLY LOAD, PLEASE. I cannot repeat this enough, NEVER start a game without the shaders loaded, as Skoddskar explained, shader loading is very CPU intensive and doing that on the background while you play is ASKING for FPS drops and crashes all over the place. Just be patient and wait, your PC and the game itself will thank you for it.
I'm running a 3080 with an I9 12900k and obviously, this is quite a banger PC right now so I can't speak for people with lower end PCs. But this game looks ABSOLUTELY ASTONISHING. The graphics are fucking incredible at high presets.
The title instantly marked my PC for most stuff on Highest settings, I did not touch anything on it except taking the camera blur away.
After playing it for a bit I noticed some stutter when I moved my camera around, then I enabled DLSS on the Quality preset and boom, gone the stutter, doesn't matter, game looks insane anyway with it on.
I've only experienced a few stutters whenever a new section is loaded when Joel drops down from somewhere or opens a door, thats it, in gameplay I had 0 issues.
I played this at 1080p 144hz (I didn't have a FPS counter so I don't know if I was hitting that, but it ran smoothly af, never hindered my gameplay). Also, if you have a good SSD the game will not take long to load either. I played this WHILE streaming it at 1080p and most time loading was probably 5 seconds.
Honestly, In my opinion Ive had pretty much no issues with Sony exclusives ports I played, I did all the other ones on a laptop with an I7 and a 2080 before this PC. I had 0 issues with GOW, Horizon, Detroit become human, The Uncharted games, Spider man or Miles Morales. The moment something doesn't run smoothly I just lower graphics a bit and I have no issues afterwards.
Aight, thats my two cents on it. Thanks for the video Luke!
PD: I hate how Hogwarts Legacy compiles shaders on PC everytime I open it, I don't know why it does that.
call of duty gives u a very noticable warning that u should rather not play before the shaders are compiled when u try to do so.... while here u can easily overlook it in the corner of the screen and even has hilarious translation errors... in german they translated building to the noun building (like in apartment builidng) xd
The box said the pizza takes 20mins at 180c. Ate some at 4mins. Overly HOT, dough is still raw, toppings completely uncooked, cheese was even still hard. 0/10 I won't be eating again.
Running on a 3080 ti, 5600x. After shaders compiled (i did not run the game while doing this, common sense) it started off perfect, and then in early combat sections it definitely started sputtering a little here and their but definitely something thats fixed 1st patch. Only 1 hour in after another hour of shaders, and yet im still happy with my purchase
Iron Galaxy also ported Uncharted the Legacy collection on PC
If the game allows you to play it then the fact that they added a tiny message in one corner of the screen that might, indirectly, suggest the player to wait before playing doesn't matter
if it causes crashings then they should simply not allow people to play it until it is completed
Shader compiliation is a CPU process and does not depend on GPU. The more cores / threads the CPU got, the faster the compilation time is in general.
me, the cognizant consumer: Does naughty dog seriously think I’m going to pay $60 to play another remaster if this game.
Future me: Upgrade to the digital deluxe edition?🥴Sign me up
The issue people have stems from lack of VRAM. The game uses 14gb of VRAM on ultra settings in 4k and popular Nvidia cards only have 8 or 10gb of VRAM.
Your 4090 has 24gb of VRAM so it isn't an issue.
I play at 1440p ultra settings on my 6800 xt with 16gb of VRAM and it plays great. Only complaint is the 30 minutes it took to compile shaders.
why did you like your own comment?
@@biancadesousa because I liked what I wrote 😉
Amd card owners always wins in long term gaming ..ggs .. nvidia always ahead on greedy marketing techniques
It will take me 8+ hrs to get back
Shaders build on my 2020 $1500 gaming laptop...
This shader compilation reminded me of installing DMC 3 on the PS3 back in 2007.
That music during Sarah’s death though…….HAHAHAHAHA DAYUM!!!
So far I love this game. Iron Galaxy also ported Uncharted. There was a shader wait there too though not as long. This game took 2 hours + for me to compile and launch, on a current gen AMD highest tier GPU with 24GB of VRam. I waited, made coffee, got some laundry done. Once I let that finish and while playing, gave the shaders time to fully catch up - which in this game, can take an hour - causing hitching - after that at least for ME it ran pretty smooth. Make sure you download latest gpu drivers, and be patient. If you have a decent pc and a lot of vram, and an nvme, I think it should be ok if you're patient. I do think they could have released a lower req not-as-next-gen version with the option to play at reduced settings for mid tier kids out there. Specs: 5800X3D, 7900XTX, 3600 32GB, NVME - it took a long time on the Deck as well and frames with everything on lowest including FSR and frames locked to 30 still dips to 25. Not a great choice for the Deck as of now.
i'll be damned if i need $15,000+ super gaming pc just to run this game as it should be without a hitch, then again we still see stutter and freeze of the game in this video
Shaders are compiled on the CPU though. I have what I’d consider a mid-range gaming PC (Ryzen 5600X, Radeon 6700XT) and while it took about 45 minutes for my shaders to compile, I haven’t had a problem with the game yet.
Granted I’ve been salivating to play TLOU since it came out and have somehow avoided all but 1 spoiler about the series in that decade or so. It’s taking everything in my soul to do anything BUT play the game.
I understand where your criticism comes from but the 4090 has nothing to do with shader compilation from what I understand.
Time traveler: how long does it take the shaders to load?
Me, booting up Oregon trails: what
I'm playing the game on an i9 10900KF, RX 7900 XT, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB and 64GB of DDR4 at 3,200 mhz. I waited for the game to build shaders. My computer's cpu and gpu specs are above the PS5 specs. My PC has more cpu cores/threads and more vram than the PS5. The game defaulted to ultra settings at 4K and ran at a playable fps and still had terrible stutter and that was after all the shaders compiled. The only explanation I have for the game running terrible on my PC is that I don't have it installed on a pcie gen 4 nvme ssd that runs at the same speed or faster than the PS5's gen 4 nvme ssd. At least I got the game for free because of the promotion for buying an AMD graphics card!
14:26 That is the best fire I have ever seen in a game!
Shader Compilation is a problem. But vram usage isn't a surprise. It was an PS5 exclusive where it wasn't necessary to account for less vram. So having it run on PC after the fact can be an issue, unless they downgrade the assets, which they probably did for the lower options. Some users just don't seem to be comfy with using Medium or lower than Medium settings on a modern mid Tier gpu which is often more expensive than the whole console the game comes from.
yea low looks like a fucking ps2 game no thank you
Well said
Tbh most those bad reviews probably got the game not reading the spec list, thinking their GPU and CPU from 2015 could run it 💀
Apart from shader compilation, the problem for me is performance. I can run the most demanding titles on ultra at 50ish fps at worst, here I'm having to settle on high at around 40 fps (with DLSS!). And lots of stuttering.
Sarah Dies
*proceeds to play some circus type music lol
It took my PC 20-30 min to load shaders on a 3080 (10gb). After that, the game ran pretty well for me besides a few stutters here and there. This is on Ultra settings 1440p.
7:01 😂 jimmy neutrons dad singing
TV feeds have a delay. It would've actually been better to see it in the window first, hear it a second later, and then we see/hear it on the TV 1-2 seconds after that.
when I first booted the game, I waited for the shaders to build and all that, then after that, I started playing, the loading times were awful (the settings weren't maxxed out) game crashed once after Sarah dies (like damn game, mood) I restarted the game, it died again 20 minutes (of gameplay not spent waiting for the game to load the areas (which happens every other encounter)) and another time right before another encounter. AFTER the patch that fixed some of the issues, no more crashes happened, however, every time I change areas (trenches to buildings for example) the game would stop for a good 5 to 10 minutes spent waiting for the load to stop. I don't have the most performant PC, but it is decently powerful to where these issues shouldn't happen at all.
I remember having so many mid game loading problem with Uncharted,
Im not too experienced at computer technicality, but seeing they still using the same "loading shader" method at the beginning, kinda makes me nervous to buy this game
I bet that at least 90% of PC players aren't even aware of what compiling shaders means, and I can't fault them for it when the game allows them to play it when it still needs to be done.
To some this might be general knowledge, but the vast majority isn't aware of these things.
It took me about an hour to get to about 25% and I never saw the End of it because the Game basically crashed my PC shortly after that. I couldnt even open the Calculator even after closing the game...
Complete truth with that carpet and hardwood floors. So clean,I can sleep on that carpet, screw purple and helix mattress.
Play this on ps5 and didn’t even realize part one had the circle in the loading screens. This port really needs sorting
I found out that my 13700K was thermal throttling due to the enormous CPU demand of this game. Once I undervolted the CPU and disabled the Turbo Boost in my BIOS, the game runs great. No stuttering, thermal throttling, or crashes. I have also not experienced any long shader loading times.
What's more scary to me is that VRAM utilisation
and it’s not even justifiable by how bad the graphics look, objects really lack anti aliasing which make it look like the ps3 version sometimes even on ultra
I had no issues with it on a mid tier pc besides everyone being randomly wet in one cutscene. Ryzen 2700x. Amd 5700xt. 64gb ddr4 ram
Uncharted 4 pc port takes that long if not more to compile shaders and shaders compilation is a CPU task...
I have an RTX 3080 and a Ryzen 5 5600x, I let the shaders compile, I played the game at 1440p High (auto detected) and I crashed FOUR times during the prologue and boston section together. Not even an hour (of gameplay) into the story and I crashed more times than I ever did playing Cyberpunk 2077 on my RTX 2060 Ryzen 5 2600x PC I had at the time...
It's not the shader compilation that is the issue, it is the port. Something went wrong and it's causing all these random issues that some people have and some don't.
19:47 Bro, that is just messed up. I have zero word for that replacement except for: "What. The. Fuck?"
I don't know if it's fair to use a high-end PC capable of brute force through most issues, I mean that's a 4090 with 24GB of VRAM nothing beats it, how about testing with recommended hardware and see if the game delivers on the promises?