Bret Weinstein Owes Majority Report a HUGE Apology
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ค. 2024
- We stream our live show every day at 12 PM ET.
We need your help to keep providing free videos! Support the Majority Report's video content by going to / majorityreport
Watch the Majority Report live M-F at 12 p.m. EST at / samseder or listen via daily podcast at Majority.FM
Download our FREE app: majorityapp.com
SUPPORT the show by becoming a member: jointhemajorityreport.com
We Have Merch!!! shop.majorityreportradio.com
LIKE us on Facebook: / majorityreport
FOLLOW us on Twitter: / majorityfm
SUBSCRIBE to us on TH-cam: / samseder
Brett is asking to speak to Matt's manager.
Are the Majority Report asking to speak to Trump's manager every time they try to convince people that he's not fit for the presidency?
He's demanding to speak to the manager when he and the manager aren't on speaking terms.
@@robm6645 Not only that; he tried to go above "the manager" by addressing himself to TYT. To bad for him TYT has no say in the matter.
Dad Sam defending his kids, i’m here for it
Kid tried to say 'yeah maybe I did something slightly wrong' but dad wouldn't hear of it 😂
"Papa Bear" 🐻
"Keep Michael's name out of your mouth". Word.
Yup, none of these Dork Web grifters give a damn about his passing, they only say his name now so they can be the "BiGgEr PeRsOn."
@@VMonkies True. Aside from being hilariously fucking stupid... They are sadly shameless fuck ups as well.
@Johnny Fishfingers I do miss John McCain although I would never have voted for him. His style of politics is sorely missed in the current era of discourse.
When did he say that?
@Viganch0 Whose death did they gloat over? The guy who died of Covid after he went out of his way to put his own life and others at risk during a pandemic, while telling others to do the same?
It is too bad I liked Matt. But now I can't because he was CANCELLED!
Yeah Matt lech has been cancelled. Why is he even on the show now after idw extraordinaire brett Weinstein cancelled him?
Actually Weinstein just asked to speak to his manager, who he is not on speaking terms with, to get him fired like a noble Karen. Not a plebian SJW.
Rob McCune *Plebeian
Is Bret trying to get Matt, dare I say, CANCELLED?!?!?!
Chancelled*
cancel culture is not real.
@@deeezgusting5311 That's the joke, my good dude
I really wished he would just return back to actually doing Evolutionary Biology. He wants to be a Richard Dawkins but is more like a Dave Rubin.
Dawkins should distance himself from Harris imo
@@qahirmakhani348 Why?
@@qahirmakhani348 He’s old af now I don’t think he’s up to date on what people been saying and doing really.
@@qahirmakhani348 hes a reactionary transphobe no different from Jk rowling. Look at the shit he's said/tweeted in the last year alone.
3:11 Good news: they're keeping Matt Lech.
Bad news: they've fired Matt Letch.
Matt needs to respell his name Leque.
@@ghenulo then we'd get: "this, uhhh, Matt Lay-cue guy, needs to be fired"
As Sam mispronounces Brett’s last name as a well! 😅
So Matt deleted the tweet and apologized. Sounds like enough to me.
he shouldn't have deleted it, which is why Sam said something along the lines of "if there _IS_ going to be a human resources review, it's gonna be about why you deleted that tweet" because when Sam deleted a tweet during the whole Mike Cernovich thing, he regretted it, lol.
For people like him nothing short of a political conversion is enough
Just hysterical
Gage Acosta what is a Chad?
@@alex_roivas333 He absolutely should have because there's no way to justify accusing a person of being a contractor or associate with the Department of Homeland Security when they aren't. That's a major accusation they were better off passing off as irony and a joke than defending it.
I love when Bret says "He hit me with something I didn't see coming that maybe I should've seen coming". It's like... WELL YEAH YOU SHOULD'VE SEEN IT COMING! Because the hypocrisy is obvious 😆😆😆
"this is their dead horse show, dark horse" LOL
Sam is a master of throwing shade.
" You've been read"
@@Jay-zt1pq He's just a piss-ant. It's too bad that he has enough other piss-ants around him to lift him up high enough to do so.
jumpinjohnnyruss Thank god we have you here, responding to every comment, in order to take him down a peg!
Bret you are boring that poor woman to death.
They got the NPR whisper radio voice down just with much loonier contenr
Mikal Carlson
His doctor wife?
It's his wife. Of course she's bored.
She's every bit as pretentious and tedious as he is.
@@Brawnald Don't disagree, but I still think unity2020 is a noble effort.
Is that ben Shapiro dad?
The dead horse show.
Vic Berger Is... is Bret Weinstein's whining gonna be made into a Vic Berger clip?🤯
The great Vic Berger graces us with his presence!
Bretty looks like Charles manson lolz.
Another Sam Seder parrot.
@@redlightmax How about Snide Sammy Seder's incessant whining?
I think Sam Seder wins the whining match here.
Ultimately, this video is largely unsuccessful in what it was trying to do.
Sam always ends up inadvertently platforming who he’s arguing against. By paying so much attention to Jimmy Dore, Sam and the MR have helped to make Jimmy even more popular.
Was that Sam’s intention all along? 🤔
Matt is wise beyond his years.
Exactly my thoughts... hanging out with
Mike Brooks (RIP) and working for the MR team does that to you
@First name Last name I think Adam was joking about the way Matt's name was being mispronounced.
So, what's the difference between being fired for cause and being cancelled? I didn't hear the distinction described.
Just guessing here, but I think if you get fired (for cause or otherwise) you can still get a job elsewhere but if you're canceled your career is effectively over.
@@gnomechomsky2524 That seems a viable interpretation. Perhaps the gentleman in the log cabin will elaborate some day.
Richard E. McGeezaks
Nah, his drunk pilot example defeats that possible explanation, a drunk pilot will never be hired again by a reputable airline, you’ll end up in Fox Nation... I mean spirit airlines.
The only consistent thing about how the term “cancel culture” is actually being used, is that ever invoked only to defend socially regressive behaviors and opinions.
It doesn’t get used when leftist professors get fired or mobbed out of their job for making broad generalizations about white people.
It didn’t get used when a black athlete was blackballed for protesting police violence.
It doesn’t get used when a government health expert’s family receives death threats for stating widely accepted facts about an ongoing pandemic.
It DOES get used when a senator uses a major newspaper to advocate the violent repression of peaceful protesters, knowing full well than a mentally unstable authoritarian is listening, and loses that particular privilege.
It DOES get used when a billionaire novel author uses her platform to conflate an already oppressed minority with groomers and rapists, and suffers backlash.
Please note that only the last two cases (which were what inspired that Harpers letter) clear Weinstein’s “might get innocent people killed by crazies” bar.
Alex Cereuceta Good point, let me take another stab at it. He's obviously making a distinction between "cancel culture" and "getting fired with cause". Cancel culture to me always involves a sort of outside "third party" outrage mob demanding person x should not be allowed to do thing y any longer, even if thing y has nothing to do with something person x did wrong. For example if person x is a graphic designer and years ago in his personal life tweeted something offensive to Inuit eskimos, an outrage mob can demand he gets fired from his graphic design job. One could argue the tweet has absolutely nothing to do with person x's competence as a graphic designer or his performance at his current job, so calling for him to get fired is different than, say, he screwed up a major account or failed to deliver a project on time or sexually harassed one of his coworkers. That's probably the most charitable interpretation I can think of.
"Keep his name out of your mouth"
When you think you couldn't possibly respect someone more.
Chapeau Sam.
Kinda cute how hard Sam went to bat for Matt defending him
Hey Sam's a bully: and all we Brets know it.
The Weinstein brothers are sanctimonious pseudo-intellectual bores.
They are first rate cringe material.
I haven’t seen such crybabies in any of the playgrounds of America.
@Bruce Gruetzmacher High IQ or academic and 'intellectual' are not synonymous. You could be the top of your academic field and still be pseudo-intellectual, particularly if you exit the bounds of your area. The same way being a scientist doesn't exclude you from being pseudoscientific (see James Watson).
I know someone here will be snarky about it, so just a heads up that it's spelt 'credible'.
No, some people are real intellectuals. The Weinsteins are two of them.
@@Etatdesiege1979 You might just be immature. If you can get past superficial bullshit and learn to focus on things that matter, you might see things differently.
@First name Last name You spelled 'bias' wrong. At least you got the first letter right.
Why is he wearing that wig sideways like that?
That is a perfect description of how his hair just doesnt seem to sit right
The same with his brother? Must've been a half off sale?
myekal147 4:46 Maybe because Bret Weinstein is a drunk host.
That is priceless.
🤣🤣🤣 oh, fuck I loved that 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Brett Weinstein is so touchy about this stuff cause he knows MR has his number.
All these right wing "intellectuals" seem to have this malady. They learned it from their hero Jordan Peterson. If the commentators on the Left were this touchy they would be demanding apologies in the dozens every day from Fox news hosts and all the Right wing nutjobs that claim, ad nauseum, we enjoy killing babies, want open borders, want Sharia law, etc. That's all we would have time to do.
@@BadAssElf810 Right wing? You're obviously out of touch with reality.
@@jumpinjohnnyruss nah
@Knight of The Unholy Filth He's not right wing, he just panders to them for money. Check his comment sections
@Knight of The Unholy Filth You sound like you were born from the internet.
took me til just now to realize that bret and eric are different people. i guess i will remember that bret is just the less lumpy brother
Someone could write an op-ed claiming they're the same people. Apparently that counts for responsible journalism nowadays.
@@burtosis yes
“Put us in danger?” Give me a break.
Remember, the future of the world depended on him. So, there.
Bret Weinstein fancies himself a secret agent. Don't blow his cover!
"I talked about my conversations with the DHS myself, so there was nothing secretive about it... But, also I needed to keep this private because it would endanger my life." Can't even keep his victimhood grievances straight.
I have a lot of respect for Sam for backing them off when they mention Michael, and now for sticking up for Matt. Huge props
"keep his name outta your mouth"...fuck yeah, Sam.
Weinstein is a cancel culture warrior
Did Bret just say he was talking with a DHS official? Did I miss something? If that isn't a consult I don't know what is. Bret gets lost in his own bullshit it would seem.
The phrase in question was "consultation work" which seems to imply that Bret was being paid to work with the DHS as a consultant.
@gorgoroth1919
Nope, he actually clarified he didn't mean to imply it was paid work. Besides that he did actually remove it after Bret asked for it. So, yeah, he should really stop whining about it.
Sam is criminally underrated
No he’s not.
David and Kyle outdoes him all the time
@@Eurodite906 matter of opinion guy
Well I heard Bret said he was just a criminal. BTW my last name isn't pronounced Letch either. So get it right if you cancel me too Dumbass.
You like this kind of content?
3:53 Matt: You wanna keep going with this clip?
Sam: Oh yes...
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gerry Last I guess you could say that Sam wants... to beat a Dark Horse.🥁
[crickets]
Is this thing on?
Bret wants to make sure Matt gets carded even when he's not buying beer.
well he should be carded. Can't have him piloting all those planes while he's drunk.
/s
It pissed me off when they mispronounced his name too
While I grant that that's not irrelevant. But what is actually hilarious is a cursory search shows tweets from Weinstein bemoaning people who say his name incorrectly as having some sort of ulterior motive behind doing so. Yet here he is himself repeatedly mispronouncing someone else's name, implying that there are just some names that are a bit easier for people to mispronounce.
@@alearnedman You suspect projection, then? Sounds like it's something he's spent some time contemplating.
@Whatzizface Somebody He definitely has seen the show
@@alearnedman Well, I imagine it is likely because Lech pronounced incorrectly is "letch" like a lecherous person. I dont think it is a mistake, I think it is very intentional
Sam the lawyer, I love it!
I wish Sam was my boss and we could dunk on people being mean to me
Sam is a great boss, obviously…just look at what all of his employees have done.💕
I like hearing Matt speak more. He has a lot to add to the conversations and has humility to him that is unlike a lot of people even on the show itself.
Bret's an ego maniac. Great listening if you want to hear someone talk about how smart they are for hours while providing very little evidence to that point.
person makes one mistake that isn't a mistake and then takes it down immediately: ''He needs to be fired!'' ''No! It's not cancel culture it's accountability!''
total joke person
Many of Bret's friends, like Tucker Carlson, lie all the time, but he never calls for them to be fired. And yet, when Matt says something that is fairly accurate, Bret calls for his cancellation.
Ya, not only is he engaging in the behavior he accused others of like Sam pointed out.... but just a little tid bit that caught my ear... "The world functions when people do thier jobs properly" said the guy who cant pronounce Matts last name right... kinda sounds like learning Matts name would be a proper part of him doing his job. That was just a lead off to question validity Mr. Wenierstien.
@@coreyander286 seeing as he's purposefully pronouncing it letch, look up the word if you don't know what it means, then yes it is bad journalism. You know Bret would get triggered if articles came out spelling his name Whinesteen or Whitestain.
Tell me whether you think Seder pronounced Weinstein's name properly if you think proper pronunciation of names is important. And once you've done that, tell me how you think pronunciation of a name is of much importance to Weinstein's job.
@@jumpinjohnnyruss Let me guess you think Wipestien is some sort of intellectual icon... anyways, Whinestien was the one aimlessly interchanging and conflating terms to make his point, and he was the one that proposing that the integrity of someones job relied on accuracy (well accuracy in this circumstance, in the examples Worthlessstien gave it pertained more to conduct). THERE WERE NOT SAMS ARGUEMENTS, Sam could call him whatever he wants, all Sam said was thay he should know his name by now.
If Wienstien is the one saying you should be fired for not properly doing your job, with him in the position he is in (nationally broadcaster pf the truth), doesnt that start with the miniscule task of learning someones name and absolutely end with not conflating terms. Or Whinestien is just full of $*** and only tried to act like these issues mattered to prove his hypocritical point.
@gorgoroth1919 Thats the point, Wipestien said collaborating. Matt never said it, did you just read the title and scroll down to the comments. Wienstien is conflating terms. Hes being a hypocrite talking aboit doing your job properly.
@@coreyander286 If you want to be taken serioisly, ya. If someone cant trust you to check the simplest of facts, what does that say about the rest of what you're saying. He shouldnt talk about how his podcast is informational, he should have the word satirical in there some where... thats all Im saying.
“it’s not cancel culture when we do it” - bret weinstein
Brett wasn't even arguing about cancel culture, he said that it was for a misrepresentation which he never apologized for.
And this is what I find hilarious about the majority report, because they often misrepresents things to seem intelligent, they even made a conspiracy theory about Sweden's justice system being racially biased because they arrested A$AP Rocky after he assaulted two afghan immigrants without any recearch on how Sweden's justice system works and rarely even made recearch on what had happened.
Brett is literally asking for Matt to be canceled though. He is demanding that Sam should fire him for misrepresenting his view , which i mean, is that not literally canceling? Especially since Matt deleted the tweet and apologized for it?
This is dumb.
Well done, defending your employees, Sam.
Matt's use of "consultation" was utterly benign. Dude must have been feeling touchy... Like Matt accidentally struck near a nerve.
I dunno if it's touchiness, all these Dork Web chuds are ultra litigious when they think they can get away with it. Case in point, Bret himself bitching his way to a $500,000 settlement when he voluntarily stepped down from Evergreen University for being a racist ass.
Agree
@@VMonkies Oh my. Well, I never heard of the guy. Just liked how Sam doesn't hold back defending his employees. That's a great trait in a boss 🙂
@@nura1627 yes, it absolutely is.
Bret gets points for being the most boring member of the IDW
He's definitely an interesting person. He might not be as willing to stoop to the sarcasm and bitchiness that attracts so many admirers for Sam Seder, but shallow waters are suited for smaller fish.
@@jumpinjohnnyruss you've commented a lot on this video it seems, why are you mad?
@@jumpinjohnnyruss You familiar with shadow projection? It seems like you're the one stooping to "bitchiness" in all your comments on this video.
@@jumpinjohnnyruss Agreed, his work in the field of phrenology is fascinating.
TLDR - "Someone was mean to me on the internet, get the manager!" Bret "Karen" Weinstein.
Being mean not a tort, slander is. Period.
My sister keeps sending me these Darkhorse podcasts. I started watching one and I'll never get those 15 seconds back.
I'd recommend opening your mind and watching more!
@@TpolTime I recommend you work on your critical thinking skills and not watch idiots like Bret Weinstein.
That Part. Sam I can't anymore with these people. Thank you , Matt and Nomi for bringing truth to power.
Complains about Bret pronouncing Matt's last name wrong while in the same sentence pronouncing Bret's last name wrong lol.
that's the joke.
@@Onus6688 No its not lol
@@jackreid5970 are you really going to make me go find the clips of sam saying he does that on purpose
@@Onus6688 If he does it on purpose then why is he getting so annoyed at Bret doing it? I mean it's even more hypocritical and bizarre in that case.
@@Onus6688 Imagine some Guy bitching over Sam making a joke. Lmao
Getting someone fired from their job is way worse than 'cancelling' them for a few days on twitter.
Not if he deserves to be fired. In that case, it's a positive thing.
@@jumpinjohnnyruss Well, in this case, Matt doesn't deserve to be fired.
Bret better catch some hands for even mentioning Brooksy!
@@classiccontent5041 because they have no respect for Michael Brooks.
@@jordan11752 this law is new to me. I have no respect for trump, do I need to avoid saying his name? Or only when he dies?
Is there anyone here who genuinely believes that someone should be fired for allegedly mixing up consulting for conversing?
I heard Matt's charactization and had to explain the truth to many Sam Sedar viewers. I get why Bret may feel this way as the claim was blatantly false.
@@marlondowney4033 I don't feel explained to. I feel this is all typical behavior for the IDW; say something inflammatory, then be pedantic when criticized.
By the way, it's Seder. You owe Sam an apology.
@@mrbadguysan That log cabin backdrop can lead one to distraction.
@@nura1627 if the Internet didn't exist, I shutter to think what the Weinstein brothers would be up to.
@@mrbadguysan I'll have to watch out for them, then. Neither has graced my algorithmic feed.
If you want people to take you seriously, don't dress like Anton Lavey.
Michael Belmes ok grandpa
Why would someone serious want to be taken seriously by people with such moronic standards? This is cult-like behaviour. Seder's fans are getting increasingly eager to show that they're prepared to be unreasonable in defense of their leader. But there are no economies of scale on cult-membership. As more people join, the price you'll have to pay in self-respect for the feeling of camaraderie is only going to increase.
@@jumpinjohnnyruss Dude, you're straight up unhinged.
ultru lol
It's that wear black because I'm mysterious bullshit from all of the IDW dildos.
Cancel culture for me, but not for thee. Weinstein is such a weenie, he should just debate Sam Seder.
I agree
A$$..! Jesus.. have some shame. Keep the man in peace .. "in peace"
This Bret Weinstein dude needs to be "fired for cause," if for no other reason than that saying that irritating phrase over and over-almost as many times as he mispronounced Matt's surname.
You know, this is why we can't have nice things. Not anyone's finest moment here...
Demanding his brother apologize got my Like.
Draw a hipster mustache on a cardboard box, name it Matt Letch, fire it on air, then give Matt Lech a raise.
Frankly, I think the intention of the DHS gut was to promote a collaboration with Weinstein. He wanted Weinstein to put out his PR/POV.... which is exactly what Weinstein wound up doing.... and then Weinstein portended concern about his own safety from this becoming public knowledge when Weinstein himself had not only first publicly released this information, but now continues to publicize this theoretically risk filled situation
Corey Ander
For purpose of discussion... let’s say their are two discreet states.... one as you describe, and one as you say is inappropriate
It seems to me that Weinstein’s original comment is consistent with either state. Ie, there might be a way the conversation was innocuous, or more contrived ... and No matter what is true.... Weinstein could say the same thing as he said. Is that fair?
In arguing with these IDW Stan's, I @ at all the wrong people cause I didn't follow them on Twitter. I officially apologize for that, but I learned arguing with IDW Stan's is like arguing with my 12 year old daughter. She will split hairs over every word I say, if it begins with the word NO to what she wants. See I leaned something from the IDW, they are little girls (sorry women and non gender confirming peeps this has nothing to do with you adults).
These Weinstein brothers are such complete and total weenies lmao
I really love you guys getting under his skin. I always have the feeling with him of a narcissistic teacher suddenly realizing he is challenged by a way smarter student.
Another indictable offense on the behalf of Brett might be the assumption that Matt's a journalist, when his official job is a producer for a political talk show. Guess wikipedia makes "associations" between journalism and production, too.
What a hack - A Harris carbon copy without the benefit of a controversey to give him relevance.
*controversy
Just helping you out, bro.
@@coldstonecanc3rgang994Haha, noted and corrected.
Thanks COLDSTONES! Good grammar helps us grow.
Bret Weinstein's sense of self importance is palpable.
Learned a new word today thank you! Pedantic; an insulting word used to describe someone who annoys others by correcting small errors, caring too much about minor details, or emphasizing their own expertise especially in some narrow or boring subject matter.
"Drunk pilot going in to perform surgery" 😂
Please note that the super casual meeting between brett and the dhs officer occured while the officer was on the clock, in uniform, right outside dhs hq
Super unofficial, bro.
Calling for anyone to be fired is cancel culture. If the boss wants to fire an employee they'll be fired. Not up to you.
Uh, that dude's content with splitting hairs to avoid anything that actually matters. A luxury of the IDW, I guess. Plus, Lech and Peck rhyme, so not that hard to remember.
"to avoid anything that actually matters."
Are you talking about this video?
Can you imagine Being Brett Weinstein’s wife?!? Having to sit there, day after day, listening to that little man.
I agree surgeon, pilot, podcast producer. Three very important jobs. Lives are at stake people!
When he explained why matt needed to be fired, he babbled some words under his breath and moved on without any clarification. If a pilot is drunk- Fired! If a surgeon is dirty- Fired! If a journalist... uh, says... uh, a thing about people interacting........ and such- Fired! what the fuck does that even mean?!
I'm glad you've been doing more videos on the Weinsteins. For awhile I thought they were two of the smarter IDW guys who I happened to have some disagreements with. But because of Majority Report I now see what clowns they really are.
What in particular?
@@drummonkey9291 Ivermectin...
@@richardvsessions1302 out of both of their whole careers, years of benevolence and promotion of free speech, that's it? One fuckup?
I don't know what youve achieved in life mate, but think you're being a bit unreasonable. Internet is one jealous little creature sometimes.
@@drummonkey9291 The fact that I know the skull is either a bear or seal should help you understand that I like Brett and Heather - Evergreen State turned into a shit show and their travails at the hands of people who would make the Khmer Rouge take notice
earns them my eternal respect...but,
you asked for a particular example and I believe their podcasts on Ivermectin are a perfect example of an old horse losing it's way ...
@@drummonkey9291 This video literally has Bret saying the guy should be fired for using the word "consult", claiming that he was misrepresenting the relationship. So i think it's more than fair to consider spreading misinformation and misrepresenting data and studies about Ivermectin and the vaccines during a pandemic is definitely enough to consider them as the clowns they are
Bret claims to be a classic liberal; does he know what that is??
Nazi?
Actually he repeatedly refers to himself as progressive on his own podcast.
It's just a right-winger pretending to be a disaffected liberal.
These IDW guys are intellectual narcissists, I’m yet to watch them without the urge to 🤢🤮
Seder intentionally mis-pronounces names all the time yet is offended if someone else does it.
13:54 - "By his own measure, he should have been fired from his OWN show" - And referring way back to when Jaime once said she has been a bit insecure in her own argumentation capabilities, but that she's learned so much from Sam who, both she and Michael agreed, is a BEAST at debate and argumentation; how he wipes the floor in that dept. I just love when Sam uses that same skill for high-art comedy... such a pleasure to watch!
You would think a person with the name ‘Weinstein’ would be able to pronounce ‘Lech’ correctly.
It is not obvious that it is an innocent mispronunciation. In Australian slang at least, a 'lech' pronounced in the same way that Weinstein did, is a person of low moral character because they sleep around (or desire and attempt to), ie, a 'lecher'. It may not have the same meaning in US slang, and the connection may be entirely accidental, but when somebody persists in the mispronunciation of a name despite correction, it is often due to a desire to insult.
@First name Last name, how kind of you to brand your opinion as utterly worthless; and demonstrate your complete lack of insight.
Why would I think that?
@@tom_curtis They were playing and pausing a video of Weinstein's previously recorded podcast. It was not a teleconference. What is this persistence despite correction?
Weensteen.
The common route for journalists who have made a mistake, is retraction/correction and possibly an apology, not firing.
All that deflecting talking about the pronunciation of a last name to end up conceding the fact you you were wrong.. if he deleted the tweet and apologized there's nothing more to discuss.
I know, right?
Can you recommend a good channel that discusses actual progressive work rather than petty arguments? I watch most of the Richard Wolff stuff I come across.
If Dave Rubin had a PhD, he'd be Bret Weinstein. Grift, grift, grift.
Oh boy, let me see you get a PhD and successfully teach evolutionary biology :D
@@giomjava He's not dumb, he's a grifter. There's a difference. I'm sure he's a fine biologist, but the way he mooches for pennies from conservatives is pathetic.
@@deoxyribomorph99 where did you see that? Show me proof.
@Joe Average you CAN criticize, but the accusations of "grift grift grift" have to come with proof. ALSO, printing falshoods about him are not the same as criticism, I'm sure you'd agree.
@@giomjava Weinstein promotes anti-medical propaganda during a pandemic on Rogan encouraging people to distrust the professionals. His stance on his grad "work" on mouse telomeres is especially silly. He says the entire scientific establishment has a credibility problem due to mouse telomeres and drug testing which is not a problem at all considering they test in primates after mice. He's a charlatan who wants attention like his "source code of the universe" brother selling snake oil.
I wish I could hear what Matt was saying in this clip...but unfortunately I couldn’t because...you know...cancelled
9:47 "Brett wanted to focus on this little pedantic thing." That sums him up well ❄️
It's a bit ironic, and likely unintentional, that most of Seder's argument is a criticism of Weinstein's pronunciation of Lech's name, which is at least pronounced as it looks, and yet Seder and Lech continually pronounce Weinstein's name incorrectly.
It's hilarious.
At 4 minutes in, this is all childish stuff. I'm out of here.
You should be aware that whenever this channel talks about the IDW, especially the Weinstein bros., it's going to be childish.
Just to save you some time.
And he can't pronounce Bret's surname...
Sam's impression of Bret is spot on
Bro why tf does he have a god damn ANTIFA tea towel wrapped around his neck LMAOOOO
How outraged do you think he’d be if a conservative journalist was fired for a slip up?
Bret is just looking sad and petty at this point.
Isn’t the name pronounced WEIN - STEIN (stine)?
Just own up man. This is just petty. Heather predicted what you would say in relation to the word consultation. It’s pretty clear what you meant.
Firing someone isn't cancelling them. Gotcha.
This made me laugh out loud! Thank you, Sam, Letch, and the TYT Team. Just kidding. I don't know what's wrong with these Weinstein's? They seemed like interesting intellectuals but now they're just whiny smart sounding goofs? Once again; thanks for the comedy. Thank you for posting. 😊
Nah, they were never "intellectuals" like every other part of the Dork Web, they cosplay as being smart but are really just in it for the grift. They repackage old ideas with new words and sell them to people who are incapable of thinking critically.
So much ad hominim here. Talk about logical fallacies
To an extent, Brett IS doing what they accuse him of doing: being pedantic, and narrowing in on details while skirting a deeper critique. But it is not surprising that Brett took issue with the implication in Matt's tweet, given that it was indeed poorly constructed and arguably designed to suggest an association between Brett and the DHS. Appraising the tweet with a dispassionate lens, one sees the tweet was not charitable and functions to stain Brett's reputation (this is not to deny the possibility that Brett in fact sides too firmly with state authority and law & order politics, however, that is irrelevant here). If Matt had substantive reasons for clarifying the true nature of Brett's association or lack thereof with DHS, instead of just lobbing off flippant twitter-sensationalism, he would've asked Brett about it. I think he has realized this. Indeed, Matt is the only one in this video who betrays awareness about how his tweet was indeed problematic. He notes that he was being 'haughty' and that writing 'this consultation work', emphasis on the word 'work', was wrong. Sam sounds like a complete moron trying to defend the tweet; when he's being unreasonable, he really commits, and here it's just fallacy after fallacy. Anyways, this is all dumb and I agree with Matt that we should redirect focus back to the material, substantive issues, not the milking of relatively minor grievances.
Nick Mosley yes. From watching this clip there seems to be a real investigative bend on Matt’s part. Sam’s more interested in being a personality just like Laura Ingraham.
Is Bret wearing a massive combover, or is it a toupee, or a combination of both? That hair is about as real as Q.
On a more serious note, how many deaths is he responsible for with his anti-vaccine rants?
i like to see sam be protective of his ppl. sam's a good dude
This was gold I love Sam
It’s ironic that Seder repeatedly dogs Bret Weinstein for mispronouncing Matt Lech’s last name while mispronouncing Bret’s last name. It sounds like Einstein not “whine-steen.” But it’s not surprising that Seder always gets hung up on trivial, superficial issues instead of legitimate ones.
Whoosh, the sound of point going way over your head.
This whole thing started when Bret asked for firing Matt for using a word maybe incorrectly.
The Intellectual Dark Web, the most oxymoronic name for a group ever.
Can you defend your suggestion that they're not intellectuals?
@@jumpinjohnnyruss Yeah, they're all idiots who thrive on anti-intelectualism.
good old Sam with valid arguments and tons of irony.
In what universe can that be found? He's a lowly sarcastic bitch.
@@jumpinjohnnyruss triggered much lol?
@@the_endgame You feel the need to specify your emotional state, but I'm more sensitive than you somehow? I notice that a year has gone by without an answer to my question.
@@Cussy69_420 Which work are you talking about? I'm not aware of him reading any of my work, and I'm not aware of any reason you would have to know that I've done any.
@@jumpinjohnnyruss actually ypur question was rhetorical, in no world did i share anything about myself, and you didn't answer mine after a year (*you triggered much?). Apparently you're so triggered that a year later you revisit this and it causes you to make not just one but 3 huge reading comprehension mistakes. Also you're subbed to the Jimmy Dore Show and Darl Horse Podcast, I feel bad for you i left the edgy atheist dawkins part of youtube behind ages ago. An actual evolutionary youtube channel is moth light media or north 02, the Weinsteins are charlatans partnered with shadowy right wing billionaires like Peter Theil yet you support their propaganda. Good luck with ineffectual ivermectin! Sam harris even said the Weinsteins are peddling 911 truth level conspiracies with ivermectin et. All.
I just found this guy annoying until he started hand wringing about DHS thugs. Now I loathe him.
True story. Before hitting play, I briefly wondered how hilarious comedian Brent Weinbach had started beef with the Majority Report.
That guy will never apologize. He always has to be right about everything. Even when he's talking complete nonsense (which is most of the time).