Brett Weinstein's Racist Mental Gymnastics Blow Tucker's Mind
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ต.ค. 2024
- Watch the Majority Report live Monday-Friday at 12 p.m. EST on TH-cam OR listen via daily podcast at www.Majority.FM
www.house.gov/...
www.senate.gov...
#SamSeder #EmmaVigeland #MajorityReport #politics #news #progressive #leftist #democrats #liberal
SUPPORT the show by becoming a member: www.jointhemajo...
Download TMR's FREE app: www.majorityapp...
TMR MERCH: www.shop.majori...
CHECK OUT MORE from the MR crew:
Matt Binder DOOMED / mattbinder
Brandon Sutton DISCOURSE / expandthediscourse
Emma Vigeland ESVN / esvnshow
Matt Lech LEFT RECKONING / leftreckoning
OTHER LINKS:
Twitch: / themajorityreport
Facebook: / majorityreport
Twitter: / majorityfm
Instagram: / majorityreport.fm
Image Credit, j4p4n
openclipart.or...
creativecommon...
Image has been cropped and color has been altered.
The actual cause of the sex imbalance in China is because in Chinese culture, the son is supposed to take care of his parents when they are too old to work, while a female would leave the family when she gets married.
imaging having to state this obvious and well known fact in response to "intellectuals" and Phd's
i didn't realise how chinese i was
This idea of getting rid of the daughters is exactly what was ended by Holy Prophet Muhammad SAW in Arabia. The Chinese have gone back to the age of ignorance which was ended by Islam.
Someone never heard of the one child policy
This is also true in pre democratic Korean culture. We didn't have a one child policy, but boys were favored because women were considered property of their husband's family. And a daughter would not be able to care for her aging parents. How an apparent intellectual and professor doesn't know this seems preposterous. It just seems like he's just plain racist and intentionally spreading hate against asians.
I'm finally glad some people are speaking up about this. As an asian person I am deeply offended by a Jewish man on one hand voicing his fear about the rise of antisemitism online against Jews, but then spewing his racist fear mongering theories against the Chinese. Though I'm not Chinese, as an asian, when hate against the Chinese rise, we get it too.
And YES Mr Weinstein does have children.
I weep for his children.
@@commonsense571 Don't it's probably too late for them. I believe they are the production team for the "Dark horse" podcast.
I had always thought that would be the case. Folks around here were targeted during COVID, kind of towards the end I think. The ones I know of are Korean and were scared to go out in public much. Small minds tend to only be capable of grasping the most basic human processes.
Fear. Anger. Rage. And those things make people become very "team like" (cultish) or tribal. Their common fear causes anger and a shared hatred.
Sad they're so UNeducated and gullible.
Orthodox/Conservative Jews in my town are pushing an agenda that includes banning books in school, identity cards for everyone, and of course, special considerations for themselves. Seems they have forgotten their history lessons.
You're being stupid. His arguments are based on evolutionary biology. The point of genes is to spread far and wide. The warfare hes referring to is at the genetic level. You create excess males so that males will then move into another region and genetically colonize the people who already live there.
I'm not sure why no one brought up why Chinese couples wanted males. Males take care of the parents as the parents age. So married couples take care of the male's parents, while the female's parents would have to be taken care of by their male child. If they don't have a male child, they don't get taken care of. Homelessness among Chinese senior citizens is on the rise.
Don't forget the Year of the Fire Horse as well. Culture overrides biology and this guest is no biologist.
Mainland China is in free fall.
@@Blodhelm Culture overrides biology? Can you explain that?
Because millions are here undocumented and over 100 have tried to break into the military bases. That's why.
@@horsedewormerI guess he couldn’t explain that. Lol
It's stunning to think that Brett Weinstein lives in his own little universe where he's a public intellectual
The public agrees that he is a public intellectual
Jordan Peterson lives in that same weird universe.
@@jeremydonnals2842 he lost any academic credibility with the ivermectin stuff
Reality?@@cliveadams7629
@jeremydonnals2842 I’m a member of the public and I think he’s a credulous fool
You’re really doing something when you’re too racist for Tucker Carlson.
Its like Kanye kicking you out of a party because you're acting too crazy.
Must think it's some money for him
@@jumpinjohnnyrussyou’re calling them oversensitive for calling this insane shit racist, yet you’re calling them racist for using a sound effect from a different country? Pick a lane, bro.
@@jumpinjohnnyruss Wow Conformity Report, that's a good one
@@jumpinjohnnyruss The racist part is when he says the Chinese have evolved to use their excess male population as "weapons" against neighbouring countries. Some real Yellow Peril stuff.
This guy started a conversation about selective breeding and then had the gall to bring up evolutionary forces. He's either immune to critical thinking or his brain takes him so far in every wrong direction possible that he could never course correct.
This evolutionary biologist had the gall to bring up evolutionary logic in a discussion about population stability. The gall!
@@lachlanbell8390The evolutionary biologist doesn't understand evolutionary biology.
@@MaddyMadMadsOh, but you do? Please, explain the evolutionary biology that the evolutionary biologist does not understand.
@@lachlanbell8390 Evolution has nothing to do with a one-child policy or a society that has traditional philosophical norms that men will take care of their parents as they age. Societies don't just magically generate more males so they can invade their neighbors. That is astoundingly idiotic and has nothing to do with evolution. Just because YOU don't understand the concept of evolution and can't recognize a huckster pretending to be an intellectual, doesn't mean normally educated people won't either. Evolution is a biological function that takes generations to reach minor changes through mutation and natural selection. Unnatural selection through societal actions by definition cannot be natural evolution, nor can accidental selective breeding over a couple of generations turn humans into insect colonies with large numbers of disposable drones, even as a population faces declining births. This isn't Pokemon, kid. Metamorphosis is not evolution and evolution is not magic. Read Darwin "On the Origin of Species," this chump sure as hell didn't.
@@lachlanbell8390 Evolution is driven by a process of natural selection. Key word: NATURAL. A government policy which influences a population to consciously select male offspring (for an "army," or for whatever reason) is not natural. So evolutionary biology cannot explain the reason for China's population trend. Is that not self-explanatory?
Why is he using the logic of evolutionary biology to understand a sociological phenomenon? He's talking about the Chinese as if they're social insects.
There is an evolutionary logic to us being predsposed for ingroup/outgroup-mentality, but... yeah, that's taking it too far.
Republicans hate sociology now, the only reason they warmed up to evolution was so that they could use it to reinforce their racism.
Thats because he thinks anybody who isnt white is effectively a social insect
It is a conservo-chud tradition to pretend everything boils down to race, thus the biological essentialism, and so in the 2000s, a new pseudoscience was born, called EvoPsych for short, not so coincidentally it started to take off right about when the last Liberal in the US who thought the Bell Curve was groundbreaking science because it hit #1 on the NYT list figured out that "Pioneer Foundation" was not an academic publishing house, just a couple of Klansmen & neo-NAZIs who retired to Canada, & Sam Harris figured out he could get rich being racist, as long as it was about Muslims.
The short answer is probably just that Brett hasn't faced real pushback on his bad ideas for so long, and they've started to branch off and grow into even worse ideas.
Basically, extended in-breeding for bad hypotheses.
Why is Tucker interviewing on a Brontasaurus steak? Freddy Flintstone might see that and just eat his table. Better be careful with his interviewees.
😂😂😂
It is also like Weinstein has never heard of a concept called "dowry".
What's like that?
@@jumpinjohnnyruss A dowry is a gift presented to the married couple from the parents of the bride when their daughter marries. It is usually money and/or property. Its value can often be quite substantial. Especially because they are heavily tied to prestige and status. Dowries are a widespread cultural phenomenon and also an aspect of Chinese tradition
As such, when the law mandates you are only allowed to have one child, it might well feature as part of the motivation for why daughters might be less desirable than sons. Regardless of whatever demographic impact that decision has. If you are poor and cannot afford a dowry for a daughter to marry someone, there is considerable pressure on you to get a son instead. Because not only do you not have to pay a dowry--in fact if your son does marry, he will receive it, but a son is seen as more likely to be able to look after you in your old age. Neither of these factors revolve around breeding a lonely generation of soldiers, yet that seems to be the only possible motivation to Weinstein.
Yea it's unreal how tightly he weaves some far-fetched explanation when a smart kid could tell you the actual one
@@JohnSilverHawkinsit’s not necessarily given to the couple
This applies to India and not China. Problem is that China used to abort millions of female children. @JohnSilverHawkins
I love how Brett’s like “oh, maybe there’s some other factor at play” and instead of doing the most cursory research into Chinese culture and the gender roles of men and women in relation with their parents across the lifespan, he just skips right to “it’s a biological imperative to create an invading Army!”
As a side note, I study math and physics and I yet have to meet an actual mathematician or physicist who considers Brett’s brother Eric to be a serious scientist.
As a side side note... Trust him I totally believe that he studies math and shit
I can't imagine that he was the first person to introduce self-dual Yang Mills equations (if I'm looking up the right guy), but the idea is perfectly worthy of a PhD thesis.
@devstuff2576 I thought the same thing. Hey wait what? For a start Brett is a biologist lol
@quackyduck1499 but he said Eric not Brett
@devstuff2576 Where’s the fallacy
How do you pull off being more unserious than Tucker Carlson? That's a talent
Weinstein is dumb but completely serious...I think. Tucker is just sort of "hmm" about everything...But I love that Putin said he wanted to work for the CIA and he didn't deny it.
You could do the micky mouse laugh more than him and still come off more serious. How does the freak do it???
Is Tucker Carlson broadcasting live from the set of the Flintstones?
Bret Weinstein talked in a serious manner. Sam and Emma responded in an unserious manner, by "making jokes." An intelligent person has a serious temperament. They're objective. Weinstein has a serious demeanor. Most people can't take him seriously. It's because they themselves can't be serious, not because he isn't. Fani Willis' responses to serious questions were unhinged. She failed to show basic decency. The way she responded was her own derogatory treatment of the serious questions. Leftists hear the truth and they become derogatory: "You're a racist." The people who can't take reality seriously have derogatory minds.
In every appearance Bret Weinstein makes, he manages to find a way to pat himself on the back. It's embarrassing.
and you of course would do a much better job. whatever. ripping soneone down cause u dont get it. real sad
@@scankhunt4206 I have no idea what you're talking about. You sound illiterate. Sad.
@@scankhunt4206
If Bret is paying you to post on his behalf he should ask for his money back.
@@taranullius9221 lmao
It's always for something completely stupid too.
So Tucker saw how successful “The Joe Rogan Experience” is and the first thing he did was look up the word Experience in the thesaurus
Encounter has such a different connotation. And not nearly all of them are heterosexual. 😂
"Close Encounters of the Tucker Kind" would have been so much better. At least then it wouldn't sound like the way women describe running into Trump or Weinstein, or the police.
Brett Weinstein talks about evolution like it’s an all knowing god figure that responds to the desires of humans lol
And humans respond to its needs.
Which would be a deranged enough viewpoint for some rando to have. But Weinstein was a professor of evolutionary biology. The fact that he doesn't fucking know better is insane.
@@RedXlV I couldn’t believe it. I’ve never heard anything like that in my life tbh.
It's what happens when you are born rich and privileged.
I have to say, the parity between how uninteresting and hollow Brett's ideas are, and how droning and miserable his delivery is, is about right.
This guy talks about Chinese people like he's narrating a bloody nature documentary, and then turns it into a military scare tactic.
A nature documentary about insects, written by a guy who saw the title of a book about evolution.
This channel is taking what Brett said out of context. Brett is 100% correct.
When I was younger I used to think professors and doctors had to be intelligent to get where they are.
Right! When someone does something intelligent once in some field suddenly they are a specialist in All fields..
Brett Weinstein could have had a dull but safe career as a professor of evolutionary biology. Maybe not as famous as Richard Dawkins, but definitely not an embarrassment. Instead, he let himself fall *way* off the deep end and keeps embarrassing himself again and again.
based on this clip, no he couldn't have. Even the most "sociobiology" oriented evolutionary biologists understand that culture is more quickly mutable than genetic change, AND that culture transmits horizontally through cultural exchange and does not only stick to hereditary lineages.
Legit quantitative studies can be done on how much culture is constrained by genetics, and statistical methods from evolutionary bio can perhaps be useful to study the diversity and transmission of culture (Dawkins coined the word "meme" to talk about units of cultural change). But this handwaving just-so stories of "the Chinese do this" and "the Germans do that" would be laughed at in an evolutionary biology setting.
That's why Dawkins was making faces here and calling for historians (lmao).
Would you have left the university when the woke mob said no white people could be on campus? Just curious
@@ajasenhis "career" would have been teaching kids crap at a meh college. Without his "clash with the woke", that would have worked out fine most likely. But thanks to that stupid college and their stupid "day of absence", he and his wife got half a million $ as settlement and podcasts like Joe Rogan opened the door for that idiot and now he has the resources and access to annoy the world, not just a bunch of kids.
@@ajasen What's your opinion on the direct impact of languages on the development of a culture? Like how a certain language and the variety of words can shape or direct how the people express themselves and affect the way they act/think. Bad example=their language is more poetic and so they're a warmer more romantic culture, but less drawn to certain sciences or they don't develop as rapidly in certain subjects.
We should be glad he’s grifting not teaching because at least those with some semblance of awareness can see him for the fraud he is, rather than young impressionable undergraduate students hearing this garbage and knowing no better
BW is an evolutionary biologist. He's talking about Fischer's sex ratio theory... it... is supposed to apply at the evolutionary (not cultural) level, which is to say if there's a *genetic* mutation with one genotype that produces more male offspring and and another that produces more female offspring, then there's "fequency dependent/balancing selection" and whichever genotype is more prevalent in the population actually has less chance of reproducing, so the rare genotype will rebalance...
If this clip is taken out of context and he's talking about non-human animals and plants it makes sense. If he's talking about humans with culture and authoritatian politics it's a complete non sequitur bc its culture/politics and not genetic variation that are controlling how people behave. 100% what Dawkins said.
He's clearly talking about China in the clip, did you watch the video?
Go back to bed caleb@@calebr7199
Ya that's a good point, and I don't remember which animal I read this about where the female can immediately pick up on when the male population dies as a consequence of hunting or territorial-related deaths, and she prepares to procreate to offset the loss. What I'd love to know is whether BW barely misinterprets these topics and conflates them to his political biases, or is he doing it on purpose to spread misinformation(and to what end).
Yea, he's missing the Forrest for the trees on this one.
The prevalence of male offspring is directly caused by the one child policy in conjuction with the cultural preference for male kids (there's an earlier comment where someone elaborates on the specifics), which resulted in potential female offspring commonly being aborted, and even instances of female infanticide.
So his idea that maybe evolution is gearing up for war is laughable nonsense.
@@calebr7199Are you joking? Just in case you're not, the commenter is talking about how Brett's comments about China doesn't make sense because it was not evolutionary forces, but a policy and a set of cultural values that caused the over abundance of males.
China is a patriarchal society, so if a one child policy is in place, most males are going to want a male heir.
@@Nick-o-time We've never had a one child policy in the West and women in the West are not going to put up with aborting a child simply because they're female. And nothing about my comment is racist.
@Nick-o-time
Whats racist about it? I don't think many ppl would say patriarchy is unique to China. Also, what makes you so sure the West wouldn't have the same issue? There's no 1 child policy in the West, so of course you wouldn't expect to see it absent the policy.
@Nick-o-time The West has never had a one child policy and western countries are no longer patriarchal.
@@Nick-o-time There's no one child policy in the west so obviously you wouldn't see this phenomenon. While I think the average westerner would not have a strong preference for their child's sex, I do also think you'd see more people who specifically want a son under a one child policy and significantly less who only want a daughter in totality. Though this probably wouldn't make up the majority of westerners.
Brett Weinstein clearly doesn't understand traditional Chinese culture, which he could learn by simply looking it up. Like European culture, Chinese culture is historically patriarchical, and in pre-industrialized China, the only way to continue the family name was to have a son to carry it. Daughters would move in with their husbands' families once they married, and for many parents in that society, investing in the raising of a child to adulthood only for them to be married off to another family was a huge financial strain on the family, especially when most families lived in multi-generational homes and the next generation was responsible for taking care of the parents in old age. That was the whole point of a dowry.
It was logical from their cultural POV, and this doesn't even reflect modern Chinese families anymore. All it takes is for Mr. Weinstein to do a little research into the historical context of it all. Meanwhile, in the 19th century, America banned Chinese women from immigrating to the States long before it banned Chinese men from immigrating for another 60 years. Specifically, white Americans accused Chinese women of all being prostitutes and carrying venereal diseases, when in fact they didn't want the Chinese to marry and reproduce within US borders. Oh how much the present continues to echo the past...
The present continues to echo the past... How very true. Plus ca change, plus cest la meme chose (sorry if spelling is incorrect).
Looking it up would go against the god complex he's got. Listening to him speak, every other sentence is him patting himself on the back for being a genius even when he says he should have seen something, something only he can see, something every sane person hears and understands is ludicrous. The man talks about humans like insects with a queens and colonies, gearing up for ant wars after "evolution" sparked a pheromone causing a reproductive change even thought that isn't how evolution works.
Can you help me understand why I keep seeing these comments? None of them mention the one-child policy and I find this confusing? Is this in reference to that policy or?
What is so baffling to me is that Brett lives in a right-wing "intellectual" (cough) space where China has been heavily criticized for the one-Child policy, forced abortions and sterilizations, etc., from the pro-life angle. A part of that discourse is how that, plus traditional gender norms and traditions in China, has created a preference for male children. For Brett to just have missed that is... I can't explain it as anything other than him losing what little grasp on reality he had left.
These people are so disingenuous. It would only take them seconds to look up the Chinese migration camps in the Darien gap and see that there is a concerted effort to migrate Chinese nationals into Panama and the US. Their attitude is so pompous.
The high sex-ratio imbalance is due to a strong son preference coupled with easy access to sex-selective abortion. He could have just done a Google search to find this out.
Right? I thought this was common knowledge.
It seems insane that Bret Weinstein actually used to be a professor of evolutionary biology. You'd think that even occasionally, by sheer chance alone, a scientifically tenable thought would leave his lips.
That lady in the white turtleneck “charging in formation,” I cannot stop laughing. Thank you so much.
You're misrepresenting what Weinstein is saying. He is saying that in the extreme situation that exists in China a rational parent would consider the likelihood that a male offspring would be able to find a mate. That's a perfectly reasonable assumption to make.
Brett Weinstein is the "excess male" in this scenario.
...yep... Compared to the beta males on this video😅
Tucker doing his best Patrick Bateman business card scene impersonation with that ‘… remarkable’, what a hollow man
A stupid person couldn't come up with something this crazy. This is something so far beyond that.
When I saw the whole interview "military age" chinese men was so extreme I could not stop laughing.
My English teachers never taught me another synonym of "Young Adult" is "Military Age" lmao.
Seems a lot less funny when considering the context...Taiwan? Hello....
Never occurred to him that in [edited for spelling] China, female dowries and male oriented inheritance, perceived greater utility and income prospects of sons as workers on the farm or factory have been a traditional concern in china.
That's why they got rid of the female children. Because they were perceived as costly to the family, both in terms of ability to contribute and loss of the family inheritance/land etc.
We did this in Europe already.
“Excess males” sounds so inhumane. People without mates are still important and can live their life.
It's amazing that this interview isn't taking place in a padded room.
I love how Tucker has now been reduced to interviewing every crackpot and has to maintain his perpetual confused face when he’d prefer to laugh at them.
100%! Tucker must have the lowest ratings in media.
They have two male children. China's old culture has always favored male children. When the CCP decided to mandate only one child per family, there were a lot of
"stillborn" female births.
China has had legalized abortion for a long time, they didn't have to find euphemisms. The policy also ended and people are still not having many kids in China to the point that they are concerned about it. This evolution talk is pure nonsense.
Weinstein: it didn't work out the way I thought it would, so I lost interest.
Haaahaaaahaaaaa
want to ruin Brett's life? pronounce his last name WEEN-STAIN
Good old the Chinese are coming the Chinese are coming yellow peril fear rhetoric. FAN THAT FLAME BRETT! 🔥
Bret could have done a simple Google search or watched the documentary One Child Nation to find the right answer. With the introduction of the one-child policy, many women were forced to have abortions. There were even cases of female infanticide in a few regions. Male kids were sadly valued more in a society which probably contributed significantly towards the tilt in demographics.
I don't believe that you even believe Bret is unaware of this. I think everyone is being deliberately obtuse and pretending to not understand Bret's meaning because it's the only way to make out like he's not saying something sensible & rational. But that's this show's entire M.O. so it's painfully predictable.
@@lachlanbell8390 Who are you, his mother? We'll stay away from your special boy when he stops saying crazy racist things and pretending he doesn't understand culture overrides biology and that evolution doesn't happen overnight, honest.
@@Blodhelm I'm just someone who checks in on this channel occasionally to see if they're still as worthless as the last time. I'm used to the obnoxiously unintelligent audience who like to pretend they're smart5 by pretending other people are dumb for saying stuff they didn't say, so your schtick is nothing new to me, kiddo.
@@Blodhelm I'm just someone who checks in on this channel every now & then to see how far the cancer has progressed. I'm accustomed to the midwit audience, but sometimes even I'm surprised at how low-IQ their takes get in their desperation to make out the other tribe is stupid.
@@Blodhelm I'm just someone who checks in on this channel every now & then to see how far the cancer has progressed. I'm accustomed to the m!dw!t audience, but sometimes even I'm surprised at how low-1Q their takes get in their desperation to paint the other tribe as stupid.
The sex-ratio imbalance in China is a vastly overstated. Chinese people got around the one-child policy not by practicing female infanticide or sex-selective abortion on anywhere near the scale supposed, but by simply not registering their extra children with the authorities.
Brett, who has a crappy PhD in evolutionary biology, totally misunderstands evolution.
there's no way you even take one graduate class in evolution and don't understand how incorrect this is... (or the amount of evidence that's needed for actual sociobiological arguments -- you can't just handwave this stuff). Weinstein knows.
I'm rofl that he made Dawkins call for a historian!!
How?
"You know when Dawkins doesn't want to boil things down to evolutionary biology you've lost the damn plot" -Emma Vigeland
the amount of money and time we spend on the border is stupid if ppl wanna live here then let them live here this is annoying
Is there a historian in the house😂
Wow. That sounds just crazy enough to be completely crazy!
The average soldier is 20 years old so you're saying that the collective body of a country would have to look ahead 20 years to know to produce sons for the war that it might do in 20 years
Star Wars plot point.
Tucker Carlson Encounter is what happens in the mens room in a gay bar.
Homophobe. Try living without hate.
LOL. Yes.
Thank you for the laugh. I think he and Rand Paul have the same toupee wrangler.
Bro just said a 'yellow hoard'? He's pretty racist by the sounds of it
Context my friend. "Yellow horde" was a term coined long ago (I'll let you look up the origin)... the guy was clearly using it to make a point by referencing the voice of a bygone era where this derogatory term was more commonly accepted, therefore better illustrating the hosts stance as to what they view is a ridiculous situation. Not everything has to be racist, context is key.
They're coming right for us!
Could you imagine the Weinstiens poor parents having to live with these two for 18 years. The horror,the horror..
The hatred and ignorance on this show, and the comments are amazing. This is a complete strawman of that interview. Weinstein has more IQ points than this panel combined and if you guys aren’t quite sure of what he’s saying it’s probably you who’s not getting it.
Before anyone wants to get stupid with me, a family must have an average of two children for gender balance to mathematically equate in a society. Brett is not suggesting that Chinese parents have control over contraception, he is suggesting that if the Chinese government wanted more women, they would change the one child policy to a two child policy.
Brett Weinstein shoehorns square-peg history into his round-hole Darwinian Theory.
“Charging in formation”
“They’re charging now”
🤣🤣🤣
The only thing that came to mind while listening to this Brett Weinstein gibberish was a quote I read somewhere:
(Only he who has heard the woman's cry at the hour of childbirth, understands the true meaning of life)..
There’s no “evolution” here, just sociology and sexism. Chinese people were limited to one child, and social pressures heavily in favor of males meant couples were statistically more likely to abort female fetuses. The trend never corrected itself partly because those same sexist pressures remain in place and partly because the gender imbalance only became apparent relatively recently. Nobody really knows what can or should be done about it, anyway, since this has pretty much never happened before. The closest analogues would be early Rome or Colonial South America which had mostly men and almost no women, so they just kidnapped women from somehwere else. Something tells me China isn’t planning to raid Vietnam or Mongolia or something to fix their sex imbalance.
That theory is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Even if it were the case, has he completely forgotten we’re in the age of advanced weapons? He sounds like he thinks we’re going back to a time when we belted each other with clubs and rocks.
Yeah, that’s where his head lives.
this incel culture is genuinely starting to annoy me
What the hell is he even talking about
Weinstein is a professional yapper
"that's like a mech suit" killed me hahaha
"The Tucker Carlson Encounter" or "Close Encounters of the 3rd Reich"
I think Jordan Peterson revealed the active Chinese sperm dispersal laboratory in one of his tweets lol
Ah, yes. I remember the time before Dawkins lost his fucking mind. The good old days.
tfw you think your wife is suffering from post-partum depression but actually shes just really upset over skewing the demographics of the country
These two are so diabolical😫
Dont know what happened to this guy, my cousin who took his classes had high praise for him before he publicly came out as a racist and lost his fuckin mind.
biological Essentialism is what he is doing and it writes out the self determination of living and thinking creatures.
Bret is talking about m/f birthrates balancing out from an evolutionary "rule of thumb" standpoint as indicated by data collected from decades of multiple and ongoing human population/demographic studies. Whether a fetus will become male or female or other is not an individual's conscious decision obviously, and he isn't talking about eugenic gender manipulation. Bret is an evolutionary biologist. Although he does often preface his assertions with: "from an evolutionary biologist's standpoint, ..." when he doesn't, it would not be wildly speculative to infer that he perceives and evaluates information from that perspective.
I was not aware that Brett Weinstein is so intellectually underwhelming, to be polite.
It’s not racist
Now I know why his students chased him off campus - he's racist to the bone 😂
“Encounter" copying the “Experience” from a certain podcast on Spotify.
These two got really nervous when the guy raised the subject of goofy podcast names.
This was hilarious, loved it. 😂😂
The litter 😂😂😂
I think he does have 2 children.
He is still a nut job.
@@Drax_Corrandit’s seems I ruffle your feathers a bit. Anyway I know he has 2 kids because I listen to his podcast during Covid. And so many of the things he said were totally wrong. He did correct some of these things. But it was very obvious to anyone that he didn’t have a clue about the subject. But yet he still going. Look up debunk the funk
When Tucker thinks you're being too racist you need to check yourself
Except he doesn't, and Brett isn't.
The one-child policy began in 1979-80.
Sooo those 'children' would now be _44+_
...is that the army we're supposed to be worried about? Winded, beer-bellied 30-40 year olds coming to get us? LMAO
Thats not when it ended… you dont know anything about statistics do you
@@JS-jr1fo It ended in 2016. Are you auggesting that was the end goal? In 1979 they decided they would 'delete' a bunch of female babies so that starting a quarter of a century later they could start raising an army? Why would that be the case, and what do you imagine this has to do with statistics
@@OscarLangleySoryu my only point is do not cherry puck data to fit your agenda… with that said I don’t necessarily agree with Weinstein… but to play devils advocate china is one of the oldest civilizations on the planet. Their sense of time is different than the west. The east always plays the long game even over many generations.
"I was looking for evidence in evolutionary science studies and since I didn't find any, I moved ahead and called my theory true".
This is the stupidest, most insane collection of words I’ve heard this year.
Aww, that's just what you think you're supposed to say.
You guys are some of the most simple-minded bad faith people I have ever heard. Any complexity in relationship to reality is always reduced to racism, sexism, transphobic, homophobia, misogynistic etc it's almost like you guys are the new Christians and it also doesn't help to hear cringy fake laughs in the background.There's definitely a Corny, bad faith, performative element to this show that quickly washes away any small amount of integrity that it might have had. Very lowbrow stuff
@@jessequest8575 totally agree
@@jessequest8575 Are you sure or do you just hear the word "transphobia" and then you turn your brain off, pause the video at 0:35, and then comment "wow, that's not real. Stupid Majority Report fans labeling everything as bigotry for no reason" and then go on to watch the newest Joe Rogan episode where he falls for another C rate tik tok sketch as being a real event proving the grand truth of the narrative or some other mush brain slop.
Is that accurate?
@@jessequest8575you are divorced from reality...
The cognitive dissonance is deafening. No, no...don't cry, aw, geez.. dialing the jack boot thugs to protect your feelings, settle down, I'm outta here. Whatever happened to "question authority" ? YOU'RE the establishment. YOU'RE the authoritarian, & you'll never, ever admit you're the villains. Nobody else "gets" victim status, & we don't want it. Isn't that convenient for you.
All this show proved is they don't understand Chinese culture at all.
Weinstein is a classic "armchair" scientist in that he sits around supposing things without the troublesome steps of data collection and analysis.
This displays a shockingly poor understanding of biological evolution from a so-called specialist
The Evergreen State College must be so relieved that they no longer have to humour this person.
I thought Evergreen collapsed?
@@AFSOC2 Nope. Still around, apparently.
Has anyone ever told Bret that there is a name for the kind of thinking he's engaging in is called? It's called social darwinism, and it doesn't have a good history.
Brett has the most believable hair I’ve ever seen. That is totally not fake hair, everyone. It is a glorious full head of natural hair. Hahaha
Oh?
...if it were fake wouldn't it look nicer? How does it look fake
America's obsession with other nations is crazy.
Where is the racism, did I miss it or is everything default racist if you speak negatively about a non-white majority country? (not a fan of weinstein whatsoever btw)
public intellectual or public toilet? You decide.
Damn Brett really has fallen hard. I used to like him. 😢
1:33
Love you Sam, but you not just missed his point, you enforced it a bit. Your mindset as an American is unable to comprehend a society where childbirth is regulated and controlled by government and deep rooted societal traditions.
Still don’t like Bret though, but a spades a spade.
It wasn’t “sexism” Emma. What happened was when parents could only have one child they wanted a boy because in their culture it’s on the kids to take care of their parents once they got older and the parents felt that they would have a better chance of being taken care of by a man. It led to millions of baby girls being killed. It was a horrible thing.
That's sexism buddy. Sexism against men and girls.
Millions of baby girls were killed... due to sexism.
Having to pay a dowry when the daughter gets married is also a consideration.
Lol. You're literally describing sexism! 😂 And yes, it was a horrible thing!
@@TheMahayanistthat policy was beyond sexism.
Non stop sarcasm. 😂
Brett Wainstein is brilliant !
Tucker wants to be Joe Rogan so badly
Can someone explain to me why this is racist? I'm pretty sure what he is saying would apply to the US if we had a one child policy. Just because we are talking about China doesnt immediatley make the statment racist. Can someone please explain why I'm wrong?
It is racist because he is somehow purporting that the increase in men in China has to do with some military strategy when it is actually because of sexist beliefs that remain as part of traditional Chinese culture - who will carry the name? A woman leaves her parents to support the home of her new family. With this structure, what Chinese family wants a girl if there is no help in any way to the family? Not agreeing this is right but this is what people believed if allowed to have 1 child.
China has issues but targeting a group and trying to make them a military threat is ridiculous when he should more easily point the finger at his own country of Israel and see the ACTIONs of his government on innocent civilians.
@@higherspirit1 wouldn’t saying it’s because of Chinese culture be more racist?
You might be confused because of the cryptic way that racists now employ culture as a dog whistle
Using culture as an explanation in a racist way usually involves belittlement or implied inferiority. Ex. Racists won't ever talk about the actual mechanisms for why a culture is a certain way, but quietly they blame the innate characteristics of a people.
Brett is doing a weird race-science thing, inappropriately applying evolution to imply that war is now an innate characteristic of a population of Chinese males. That's why what he's saying is racist, and merely using Chinese culture in an explanation is not. Hopefully this helps you, and you aren't just trying to troll.
@@FallingAliceMusic Maybe sexist or ultra traditional perhaps. Either way, Weinstein prefers to go down some unproven rabbit hole with strange QAnon logic rather than point the finger at his own racist country which has data showing genocide of innocent civilians. But that wouldn’t be a headliner or make money for him because we are already aware of that. Look him up, he has no credibility, he seems to profit from fake accusations.