Wow! These videos are great. I just watched this six part series and they really showed a difference. I was really struck by how the difference didn't seem as great going from the B&W into the Yamaha is it did going from the Yamaha to the B&W. As in, what the Yamaha added for me was much more dramatic when it was taken away. Hope that makes sense. Anyway, very cool! Subscribed and am looking forward to watching more.
I must thank you for the quality of the microphones and the recording . So I can hear big difference between the two recordings. Surprisingly, I hear the opposite result than I would have expected from the technical datas. The specs for the Yamaha shows a much clearer high transmission, by a higher frequency capability , but here it is the flip : muffled sound compared to the B&W. Surely the recording has not been swapped ?
I don't know if you feel that way because the original song has a big Bumpy song. B&W 805 D4 Full Version and YAMAHA NS-3000 Full Version are also uploaded, so please listen to them. thank you
@@larkin301 Thanks for your advice. I've listened to this recording several times now and have a slightly more accurate opinion : the B&W highs and mid-highs are clearer, more open and well articulated. The mid and mid-low sounds are incomplete, a little fuzzy. Yamaha's mid and mid-low sounds are significantly better, but in the treble ( guitar sounds ! ) the sound is closed, dull, colourless, lifeless compared to B&W. I found a video ( th-cam.com/video/WbUXG9ymxe8/w-d-xo.html ) where the 705 and 805 B&W compete. There it is also obvious that the 805 got a much higher quality tweeter. But the rest of the sound is not really notable. It's excellent, open treble can compete with the Yamaha's treble, the rest of the B&W spectrum is not competitive with the Yamaha. So I think integrating the two would result in a third, more impactful speaker. The 805's tweeter-e gives life to the sound. Even though the Yamaha's treble is clean, and detailed, it lacks that life. ( see : th-cam.com/video/EqaIMZkdWH0/w-d-xo.html time: 1:45 - 2:20 Hammond organ sound) It's a very small, nuanced plus, a little floating and a little extra openness, but it gives the sound life.
![② [Sound Battle] B&W 705 S3 vs YAMAHA NS-3000 (Dire Straits - You and Your Friend)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5LjstEHbVPw/mqdefault.jpg)
![② [Sound Battle] B&W 705 S3 vs YAMAHA NS-3000 (Dire Straits – You and Your Friend)](/img/tr.png)
Wow! These videos are great. I just watched this six part series and they really showed a difference. I was really struck by how the difference didn't seem as great going from the B&W into the Yamaha is it did going from the Yamaha to the B&W. As in, what the Yamaha added for me was much more dramatic when it was taken away. Hope that makes sense.
Anyway, very cool! Subscribed and am looking forward to watching more.
Thank you so much for subscribing to my TH-cam channel. I will try to make better videos.
가느다란 반주소리와 굵은 바리톤 voice가 잘 어울리는 음악~🎉
Hi!
I am a new subscriber. Please tell me the name of this song from the intro!!!
I must thank you for the quality of the microphones and the recording . So I can hear big difference between the two recordings. Surprisingly, I hear the opposite result than I would have expected from the technical datas. The specs for the Yamaha shows a much clearer high transmission, by a higher frequency capability , but here it is the flip : muffled sound compared to the B&W. Surely the recording has not been swapped ?
I don't know if you feel that way because the original song has a big Bumpy song.
B&W 805 D4 Full Version and YAMAHA NS-3000 Full Version are also uploaded, so please listen to them.
thank you
@@larkin301 Thanks for your advice. I've listened to this recording several times now and have a slightly more accurate opinion : the B&W highs and mid-highs are clearer, more open and well articulated. The mid and mid-low sounds are incomplete, a little fuzzy. Yamaha's mid and mid-low sounds are significantly better, but in the treble ( guitar sounds ! ) the sound is closed, dull, colourless, lifeless compared to B&W. I found a video ( th-cam.com/video/WbUXG9ymxe8/w-d-xo.html ) where the 705 and 805 B&W compete. There it is also obvious that the 805 got a much higher quality tweeter. But the rest of the sound is not really notable. It's excellent, open treble can compete with the Yamaha's treble, the rest of the B&W spectrum is not competitive with the Yamaha. So I think integrating the two would result in a third, more impactful speaker. The 805's tweeter-e gives life to the sound. Even though the Yamaha's treble is clean, and detailed, it lacks that life. ( see : th-cam.com/video/EqaIMZkdWH0/w-d-xo.html time: 1:45 - 2:20 Hammond organ sound) It's a very small, nuanced plus, a little floating and a little extra openness, but it gives the sound life.
Wow so hard to pick one