Empire: Total War 1vs1: Line Infantry (AUSTRIA vs PRUSSIA)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ส.ค. 2024
- Empire: Total War 1vs1: Line Infantry (AUSTRIA vs PRUSSIA)
Nation: Austria vs Prussia
AI Strength: normal
*Fire by Rank used.
*Prussia Line Infantry's stats are unmatched in terms of reloading skill, and have slightly higher morale and charging bonuses.
*Austria Line Infantry have poor morale, shooting capabilites, and melee capabilities, but have 25% more men per regiment.
Numerous, reliable, and durable, Line Infantry are the mainstay of most armies in Empire: Total War. Thanks to their large numbers, high morale, excellent defense, and resistance to morale shocks, line infantry are very resilient. In addition, they are very proficient in shooting and reloading, and have deadly melee capabilities. Short of specialized melee infantry, other line infantry, and well-placed cavalry, few units can expect to fight against line infantry regiments head on and expect to emerge victorious. Line infantry gain the ability to deploy wooden barricades or dig trenches, further enhancing their defensive abilities against cavalry and fire, respectively. Every major faction in the game has slightly different line infantry. The British, for example, have some of the finest line infantry in the game, with slightly higher morale and reloading capabilities, and excellent defensive melee capabilities, leaving them even less vulnerable to frontal charges. Prussian line infantry are unmatched in terms of reloading skill, and have slightly higher morale and charging bonuses. On the other hand of the spectrum, Russia and Austria have notoriously poor line infantry in terms of shooting capabilities, although Russian line infantry are excellent in offensive melees coupled with unmatched charging bonuses, while Austrian line infantry have poor morale, shooting capabilites, and melee capabilities, but have 25% more men per regiment.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
My Discord channel: / discord
#TotalWar1vs1 #TotalWar #Empire
The ultimate match of quality vs quantity.
Yes👍
"2000 years later..." Mood. Nide edit there. 🤣
😈
Frederick's soldiers do not disappoint ;)
Yeah 😈👍
2000 years later is so damn true. Even though Napoleon total war is my first and one of my favourites, I can't get over how slow everything is there compared to other total war games. But gotta say the amount of mechanics there, the complex campaign (building etc), naval battles is nice thing to have.
Yeah 👍. Napoleon is my favorite total war too.
I still find Napoleon faster than Empire.
Played a lot of online battles there and since the units don't need to reform that much, they end up having faster engagements.
Empire truly depicts the age both sides would stare at each other and take a shot at a time.
@@JonatasAdoM Yeah, there are still many bugs in Empire right now... However, I prefer Empire to Napoleon because Empire has large map and more variety of units.
Haha Prussian discipline 150% go brrrrr.
😈👍
loved that spongebob intermission
😈😈
It seems that Austria had one stray man that caused the entire unit to lose time, and Prussia got the crucial first volley. Do we have a scenario where both sides fire at the same time? Seems like a fairer comparison
they both had to reset.
Then it has to be played against another human player not AI, then they can time their shots together
The timing was nearly the same.
@@TotalWar1vs1 no it was not really
The prussians killed with their first volley enough soldiers and it was the same for all lines which reduced the advantage of the austrians which is number of bodies and with that number of shots
Poor army vs poor comanded army.
😈👍
one of my favorite sayings for Empire: total war is "anyone can shoot a musket." as long as they have good accuracy and range they'll perform as expected, anything from militia all up to line infantry i just throw into an average gunfire group with firelock armed citizenry at the bottom of that and elite troops at the top as outliers.
of course this is only for shooting, I could expect militia and line infantry to shoot similarly, but melee combat is completely different
😈
I'm in the tail end of my Prussian Campaign now. Have a solid alliance with Poland (Germans and Poles getting along, strange) and Russia (even stranger bed fellows). About to knock Spain out of the game, it'll be fun to see what happens to their large empire in America. The Marathans are invading Europe through Russia while I'm invading southern India. Fun game.
Nice 👍
i absolutely hate that their marching speed and the sound is not in sync....
Yup...
That 2000 years feels really accurate here.
😈👍
Same unit
Prusia:
+ Accuracy
+ Reloading Skill
+ Melee
+ Defense
+ Morale.
Win.
Oh, surprising !!!
It was a little surprising to me. There was a game theory concept about it (whose name I'm forgetting) which suggests that greater numbers of weaker units are disproportionately successful against smaller but better quality units in turn based fights. When exchanging shots, I figured that the sheer number of men to kill, versus the number of bullets coming out of them, would give Austria the edge. I suspect its the reloading speed that allowed Prussia to win over time (because that essentially gave them slightly more "turns" or volleys.
Austria has 40+ men it was about a 25% increase in man power but Prussia has about a 12% increase in accuracy and a 75% increase in reload.
@S. C.L: They're not the same unit. Austria Line Inf has 200 men while Prussia Line Inf has 160 men.
@@TotalWar1vs1 the same type of unit... Line Infantry...
The final results are what they are.
160 - 200 - 500 - whatever.
The statistics are what they are, and the final result is, what it is.
In the end, everything is mathematics, and this could be intuited, that is, it is not surprising.
@@s.c.l5382 its not quite "whatever."
Given how the remaining men on both sides was roughly equal towards the end, a unit size of 500 most likely would have flipped the result. the unit size does matter, its just that 40 extra men in this case did not cause enough of a difference
Make a ottoman line infantry vs austrian line infantry video pls
Okay bro.
@@TotalWar1vs1 that's highly appreciated
Get ready for ottoman siege nr. 3
its weird how the people in the front row survive, and the people standing.
Why weird? Bullets can go past the front line and kill sodiers standing in the next lines
I think the real question would be, is there ANY match that the Austrians would actually win?
I think they win against regular Line Infantry (Spain, for example)
In firefights the Austrian could win against the Russians as long as the terrain is flat and not having too much hills for the Russians to creep in close enough to charge the Austrians, because the Russians Line Infantry has highest melee charge in the game URAAA
Yes, they win against Standard Line Inf. Here my video: th-cam.com/video/X6XNbb5RTQY/w-d-xo.html
@@TotalWar1vs1 You're telling me that all factors considered, Austria has one of the most effective line infantry units in the game and 1v1 would defeat most nations? Well that has got to be the most historically inaccurate part of the game.
@@Gabriel-ip6me the innacurate part is the bad stats
historically the austrian empire has always performed great
Fun fact: Prussia's line infantry is the best in the game. Even better than the British
👍😈
Russian infantry is also the best. NOT IN FIRE, but in melee combat. As said Suvorov, "bullet is a fool, bayonet is well done". And that was true till the 1-st World War.
While defending and capturing castles, and of course fighting cavalery, this is more excellent quality.
Because even Prussia could not do 2 shots when cavalery runs to you.
And yes, Prussia has really the best shoot infantry, it even needs neither cavalery (besides to destroy running away troops and attack artillery) nor grenadiers. Light infantry has 120 soldiers (1.5 times more than any another).
@@BannedFromHeaven. 👍👍
@@TotalWar1vs1 I think, you should now try melee fight of Austrian line infantry vs standard. If Austria wins, later vs Russia.
Empire,Napolean: man it take so much time to reload.
Shogun,Medival,Rome,Three kingdom etc: HAHAHA my melee weapon goes CHONG CHING CHONH CHING
👍😈😈
But if high rank vs high rank with good commander austria win due to they got more buff due to unit size right?
Yup! I think so.
Picture vs actual unit
Yes, the difference is their nation.
@@TotalWar1vs1 yes, but I have meant that the pictures is so nice and elegant though the unit looks messy compared to it.
@@Mikesman1000 Oh I see.
Isn't the Prussian Line Infantry's main weapon during that time would be the Dreyse Needle Gun breech-loading rifle? Which was the first breech-loading rifle to use a bolt action to open and close the chamber, was the main infantry weapon of the Prussians in the Wars of German Unification.
this is 18th century not late 1800s.
Absolutely not, you are 100 years early.
Ok you guys. My mistake.
@@justinisaacrada8540
No offense tho. Actually game from post Napoleonic world sounds like fun when thinking about it.
@@fridriechrussofobber3500 check out Fire and Manouver, its still under development but has similar concept to ur idea
Next time match 2 exact same units like prussian line inf vs prussian line inf. There is no way there could be more boring scenario than this one here.
There is a quantity difference
Please watch the stats more carefully bro. Austria Line Inf have 200 men while Prussia ones have 160 men.