His point about our lack of brain evolution is proven by the man vs. bear scenario. There is no real danger now, so a scenario had to be created to feel danger. Because there is a craving for chaos.
That's true, you can also apply that same notion to politics as well. There always has to be a boogie man of some sort to induce fear and keep us all stagnant, guessing, afraid, or just simply in order.
@k.weirdo7747 The creator is talking about the lack of evolution in our thought processes. You don't just turn off survival cues that existed for millenia after having electricity for a century.
She doesn't seem to understand that if you as the woman are asking for a blueprint from him because you make more money than him it implies that you think he's less than. There are plenty of good men making 70-90k happy with their career choice. A woman coming along and telling them they aren't good enough is going to be off putting.
Why do they consistently keep using the word intimidate? I have never once heard of a man be intimidated by a woman’s job. They are the only ones who care because men know their money has nothing to do with our lives
@@Seancarter2010 it's projection. They are intimidated by a well spoken, successful BM who won't be controlled. So much so they go for Pookie because they know they can control him.
@@MADMOGtheFrugalPrecisely this. Women often accuse men of the things they think and feel. They have been conditioned to think we are exactly the same so they can't comprehend that we might actually have different thought processes.
Here's why they say 'men are intimidated': Because, if they have a job position, that holds any power/control, they tend to want to argue a lot. Initially, men will concede, just to keep the peace. But, once they realize they've given up ground they can't get back, they leave. Women think it's intimidation, when it's just trying not to battle over everything.
It's more simple than that: Women think and speak using terms of emotional extremes (Love/Hate, Intimidated/Brave, Bestie/Enemy), and they don't think of men as humans with complexities equal to their own. Relying on negative extremes saves them from having to apply the empathy needed to consider nuance.
Nah this is where I disagree. I think when women say they "intimidate" men I think they are identifying something very real just using the wrong word. It isn't that these men are intimidated, its that say if you got a women who is doing well financially and is dating a guy who is struggling financially, that success shoves a mirror in their face reflecting their own shortcomings. So they become self conscious and often you see these men.
@@mrt094 It's not the mirror making men self-conscious, it's the women who throw mens shortcomings in their faces when they're angry. Women don't fight fair...which would be a good topic for another video.
@@RoyalRumBull What you’ve said relates to a couple of observations swimming around in my head as of late. 1) Romantically, women operate with a lack of empathy toward men. 2) They also have a tendency to reinvent phrases that already have terminology. (“Emotional intelligence” comes to mind.) Maybe this is just slang? But it sure seems to be the opposite of clear…and the new result is consistently, conveniently slanted.
@@mrt094 Sometimes. However: taken into consideration the labor split, success for a woman is (on average) mid-tier management. Men overrepresent high earners. And women express a preference for men who “match” or “exceed” them. Are these women “intimidating” (triggering self consciousness) in the successful guys who avoid them? I don’t think that’s what’s happening.
Hope I don’t misquote him, but FD Signifier mentioned in his video on “The Gender War”, that one issue we have as black people is that we pursue and pedestalize an ideal relationship/household dynamic that was not meant for us. In fact we were systematically impeded from achieving so, but we still chase it instead of looking at what has worked for us historically or traditionally.
I mean it's a ridiculous assertion when the two family household worked for us all throughout Jim Crow and didn't start to become impeded until the 60s. I'm tired of all this talk about obstacles for black people. You got two choices, allow them to stop you and admit defeat or push through them. The constant complaining does nothing for us, no one is coming to the rescue. If you as a black person want the family, kids, marriage, white picket fence fight like hell for it so it's easier for your kids to obtain it when it's their turn.
@@mrt094 The household dynamic I was speaking of was not a 2 parent household. That's should be a standard for any household, regardless of race. The dynamic I was speaking on, is that the man is the breadwinner and has to pay all bills, while the mom is the homemaker only. Since access to the type of jobs where a black man could support a family alone was denied back in the day, the woman had to work, and the man picked up some of the homemaking responsibilities. Also, not saying it's not possible for black people to get these high paying jobs, just percentages show that employment for these positions are still skewed to Caucasian people's favor heavily.
Trying not to be full on sexist, here, but: The “we” is women. I was nearly 40 before I started recognizing that a substantial component to the criticism of men as “deadbeats” has less to do with us NOT working than that we don’t make enough for women to stay at home.
@@everObvious Women definitely do push the deadbeat narrative more than men, but I do see some men that try to call a man lesser for not being the breadwinner. Though I do think men antagonize another man for this less than women do now days.
@prymates it was a delusion set forth by one decade of effective socialist ideals. The reality that has always been women had to work even married and took care of the house. Women were out in the field with their man tending to the fields or being a nanny or secretary. Men worked the harder jobs blacksmith, hunting and carving the animal, construction.
High School. Most women peaked physically in high school. Hit a ceiling. Began a slow or drastic decline at 24. 😅 From the 1990s back it was common for men to get wives at peak freshness. Now dudes are overpaying for middle aged old heads.
@@jaskegoffii3968 The age thing has some of you mentally fk up. With a parent's permission a 17yo woman can join the military and die for her country. No protest about her being too young to serve. My 87yo grandmother got married at 17. Had 6 kids. Stayed faithful to my grandfather until he died. We honor her. Nobody said she was too young 😅 I'm 46. 80% of the women that I went school and served in the military look like trash. Their BEST years was between 17-24. Even my high school sweetheart turned into a dumpster fire after having a baby at 22. So women better lock down a man fast before they turn to 💩
I'm not going to say what's already been said about the false "intimidation" factor, but I've never heard what she's claiming that women say from a woman's POV.
Why is every woman an entrepreneur now? If you all are business owners who is working normal jobs? Also their are tons of people who work great jobs, make lots of money and not have to take the pressure of doing it themselves. The reward isn't immediate but no reward really is.
As soon as she started talking about the intimidation factor, she ran into a brick wall. Contrary to popular belief, black men still make more than black women. And I find it mighty cocky for women to put so much effort into their career and put little to no effort into being the woman that most respected men say they want.
All day, every day I'll take being a rich "lonely" childless 60 year old man, than living a life with a quarrelsome woman. Proverbs 21:19: "It is better to live in a desert land than with a quarrelsome and fretful woman."
@@retrojay86 If you're really good at READING COMPREHENSION, you would have understood the part where he was comparing between two options. His statement has nothing to do with his character as a person.
@@retrojay86 You just want to be an AH, and nothing else. You intentionally chose to misinterpret his comment, then insisted that your interpretation is the real deal. What makes you a real man? Your ability to attract women? Money? Wisdom? (that I seriously doubt) People see things differently. People define themselves (positively or negatively), not what you think should be a man.
It's not a marketplace... In a market if you have the money whatever you want is yours but in real life, what you want needs to want you back. And that goes both ways with a slight slant in woman's favor becasue men want women waaay more than women want men so women have the leverage.
She needs to think harder or learn more about technology. Egg freezing works but the what is the success rate for each year after. And then what is the quality of the womb over time. Don't just take the party off the answer that makes you feel good. READ THE FINE PRINT TOO.
3:14 How does it start with Biology if it's the environment that clearly that dictates the nature of how we respond physiological? Is the assumption that we're unable influence the environment and as such we go to the next best thing that we can quite possibly influence?
I took the statement from the perspective of evolution: sure, we change over time, but we’re talking thousands of years. Human civilization progresses waay faster than our ability to grow a second thumb, for example.
The first sentence let me know he doesnt know what he is talkinh about. Biology is a study of organic matter. Its not a religion. Yall keep talking about evolutionary biology like its a tenet of Buddhism. Yall bugging.
There’s a lot of Nissan Altima’s on the road, student loan debt, and evictions out here for these women to talk about how men are scared of them.
Spitting
His point about our lack of brain evolution is proven by the man vs. bear scenario. There is no real danger now, so a scenario had to be created to feel danger. Because there is a craving for chaos.
@@stephenfoster1257 I disagree. I believe our emotional development is lacking. Both women and men.
That's true, you can also apply that same notion to politics as well. There always has to be a boogie man of some sort to induce fear and keep us all stagnant, guessing, afraid, or just simply in order.
@@k.weirdo7747 I didn't say women. I said our.
@k.weirdo7747 The creator is talking about the lack of evolution in our thought processes. You don't just turn off survival cues that existed for millenia after having electricity for a century.
She doesn't seem to understand that if you as the woman are asking for a blueprint from him because you make more money than him it implies that you think he's less than.
There are plenty of good men making 70-90k happy with their career choice. A woman coming along and telling them they aren't good enough is going to be off putting.
Why do they consistently keep using the word intimidate? I have never once heard of a man be intimidated by a woman’s job. They are the only ones who care because men know their money has nothing to do with our lives
@@Seancarter2010 it's projection. They are intimidated by a well spoken, successful BM who won't be controlled. So much so they go for Pookie because they know they can control him.
@@MADMOGtheFrugalPrecisely this. Women often accuse men of the things they think and feel.
They have been conditioned to think we are exactly the same so they can't comprehend that we might actually have different thought processes.
Here's why they say 'men are intimidated':
Because, if they have a job position, that holds any power/control, they tend to want to argue a lot.
Initially, men will concede, just to keep the peace.
But, once they realize they've given up ground they can't get back, they leave.
Women think it's intimidation, when it's just trying not to battle over everything.
It's more simple than that: Women think and speak using terms of emotional extremes (Love/Hate, Intimidated/Brave, Bestie/Enemy), and they don't think of men as humans with complexities equal to their own.
Relying on negative extremes saves them from having to apply the empathy needed to consider nuance.
Nah this is where I disagree. I think when women say they "intimidate" men I think they are identifying something very real just using the wrong word. It isn't that these men are intimidated, its that say if you got a women who is doing well financially and is dating a guy who is struggling financially, that success shoves a mirror in their face reflecting their own shortcomings. So they become self conscious and often you see these men.
@@mrt094 It's not the mirror making men self-conscious, it's the women who throw mens shortcomings in their faces when they're angry. Women don't fight fair...which would be a good topic for another video.
@@RoyalRumBull What you’ve said relates to a couple of observations swimming around in my head as of late.
1) Romantically, women operate with a lack of empathy toward men.
2) They also have a tendency to reinvent phrases that already have terminology. (“Emotional intelligence” comes to mind.) Maybe this is just slang? But it sure seems to be the opposite of clear…and the new result is consistently, conveniently slanted.
@@mrt094 Sometimes. However: taken into consideration the labor split, success for a woman is (on average) mid-tier management.
Men overrepresent high earners. And women express a preference for men who “match” or “exceed” them.
Are these women “intimidating” (triggering self consciousness) in the successful guys who avoid them? I don’t think that’s what’s happening.
Hope I don’t misquote him, but FD Signifier mentioned in his video on “The Gender War”, that one issue we have as black people is that we pursue and pedestalize an ideal relationship/household dynamic that was not meant for us. In fact we were systematically impeded from achieving so, but we still chase it instead of looking at what has worked for us historically or traditionally.
I mean it's a ridiculous assertion when the two family household worked for us all throughout Jim Crow and didn't start to become impeded until the 60s. I'm tired of all this talk about obstacles for black people. You got two choices, allow them to stop you and admit defeat or push through them. The constant complaining does nothing for us, no one is coming to the rescue. If you as a black person want the family, kids, marriage, white picket fence fight like hell for it so it's easier for your kids to obtain it when it's their turn.
@@mrt094 The household dynamic I was speaking of was not a 2 parent household. That's should be a standard for any household, regardless of race. The dynamic I was speaking on, is that the man is the breadwinner and has to pay all bills, while the mom is the homemaker only. Since access to the type of jobs where a black man could support a family alone was denied back in the day, the woman had to work, and the man picked up some of the homemaking responsibilities. Also, not saying it's not possible for black people to get these high paying jobs, just percentages show that employment for these positions are still skewed to Caucasian people's favor heavily.
Trying not to be full on sexist, here, but:
The “we” is women. I was nearly 40 before I started recognizing that a substantial component to the criticism of men as “deadbeats” has less to do with us NOT working than that we don’t make enough for women to stay at home.
@@everObvious Women definitely do push the deadbeat narrative more than men, but I do see some men that try to call a man lesser for not being the breadwinner. Though I do think men antagonize another man for this less than women do now days.
@prymates it was a delusion set forth by one decade of effective socialist ideals. The reality that has always been women had to work even married and took care of the house. Women were out in the field with their man tending to the fields or being a nanny or secretary. Men worked the harder jobs blacksmith, hunting and carving the animal, construction.
I see Dr. Taraban made it a cameo 😅👍
Why is it that no one who’s getting to the bag can see any of the strings controlling the system?
High School. Most women peaked physically in high school. Hit a ceiling. Began a slow or drastic decline at 24. 😅 From the 1990s back it was common for men to get wives at peak freshness. Now dudes are overpaying for middle aged old heads.
High school??? Before they're 18?? 🤨🤨
@@jaskegoffii3968 The age thing has some of you mentally fk up. With a parent's permission a 17yo woman can join the military and die for her country. No protest about her being too young to serve.
My 87yo grandmother got married at 17. Had 6 kids. Stayed faithful to my grandfather until he died. We honor her. Nobody said she was too young
😅 I'm 46. 80% of the women that I went school and served in the military look like trash. Their BEST years was between 17-24. Even my high school sweetheart turned into a dumpster fire after having a baby at 22. So women better lock down a man fast before they turn to 💩
I'm not going to say what's already been said about the false "intimidation" factor, but I've never heard what she's claiming that women say from a woman's POV.
The ivf procedure have a very low success rate and is expensive.....they not telling yall women that
Dr. Taraban makes a lot of very valid points
Another great one
Why is every woman an entrepreneur now? If you all are business owners who is working normal jobs? Also their are tons of people who work great jobs, make lots of money and not have to take the pressure of doing it themselves. The reward isn't immediate but no reward really is.
As soon as she started talking about the intimidation factor, she ran into a brick wall. Contrary to popular belief, black men still make more than black women. And I find it mighty cocky for women to put so much effort into their career and put little to no effort into being the woman that most respected men say they want.
Women dont care about the blue print especially if it requires her to do any work and take personal responsibility.
The problem is having someone you need to take care of and that person brings in the same income as you-modern women
All day, every day I'll take being a rich "lonely" childless 60 year old man, than living a life with a quarrelsome woman.
Proverbs 21:19: "It is better to live in a desert land than with a quarrelsome and fretful woman."
If you're that great of a guy you can find a quality woman
@@retrojay86
If you're really good at READING COMPREHENSION, you would have understood the part where he was comparing between two options.
His statement has nothing to do with his character as a person.
@@aktob316 and I'm saying it's babble, and a completely false comparison if you're an actual quality man.
@@retrojay86
You just want to be an AH, and nothing else. You intentionally chose to misinterpret his comment, then insisted that your interpretation is the real deal.
What makes you a real man?
Your ability to attract women? Money? Wisdom? (that I seriously doubt)
People see things differently. People define themselves (positively or negatively), not what you think should be a man.
@@aktob316 carry on brother 👌🏾
There may be men who are intimidated by successful women, but that’s not why they are single.
It's not a marketplace... In a market if you have the money whatever you want is yours but in real life, what you want needs to want you back. And that goes both ways with a slight slant in woman's favor becasue men want women waaay more than women want men so women have the leverage.
It’s always Jermaine’s fault.
2 heads are better than one although two leads don’t equate to the same thing especially with different agendas…
She needs to think harder or learn more about technology.
Egg freezing works but the what is the success rate for each year after. And then what is the quality of the womb over time. Don't just take the party off the answer that makes you feel good. READ THE FINE PRINT TOO.
Where this came from lol
💯💯💯💥
3:14 How does it start with Biology if it's the environment that clearly that dictates the nature of how we respond physiological? Is the assumption that we're unable influence the environment and as such we go to the next best thing that we can quite possibly influence?
I took the statement from the perspective of evolution: sure, we change over time, but we’re talking thousands of years. Human civilization progresses waay faster than our ability to grow a second thumb, for example.
The first sentence let me know he doesnt know what he is talkinh about.
Biology is a study of organic matter.
Its not a religion.
Yall keep talking about evolutionary biology like its a tenet of Buddhism.
Yall bugging.
This dude is too soft and conciliatory. I dont worry or try to appease Black women
@@123pbI’m sure they’re hurting about it