Love this deconstruction. So many elements coming into play to create the beautiful final image, perhaps starting with that amazing pair of boots. They remind me of the movie and stage production Kinky Boots. ❤
@@lindsayadlerphoto - I know. Just joking. But, have you actually maybe never seen chromatic aberration in photos? Once you see it, provided it's there, you cannot not see it any longer. No, your image does not have that aberration, but the green edge light gave the association. I love your images and creativity, to be seriously clear.
@@jpdj2715 ahahaha okay I thought maybe. Yeah, I had some old lenses back in the day that had green/magenta around edges of tree branches-- was awful once you saw it. New lenses of course not having that problem. xo
@@lindsayadlerphoto - "of course" applies to your brand. Imagine a studio portrait that I would normally shoot at f/5.6 or f/8, but as a way to soften irregular skin already in camera, I shoot at f/1.4 with a very sharp lens that consequently has a very shallow depth of field. Magenta tinge on the cheek and a bright greenish tinge on the edge of the ear. I migrated to mirrorless with much better lenses in 2019 that did not make me suffer from this any longer. Yes, stopping aperture down made it go away but you buy shallow depth of field to be able to use it. (I'm in the McNally brand camp) That CA and tint differences between different lenses were my recurring rant since 1975. But it was all predictable, and generally manageable, it had worldwide support, but I didn't need that because it never failed.
All those profoto lights add up to a lot of dollars! Do the opticals and gelled bare bulb require the full power? I’m more in the Wescott FJ400 price range on gear. I guess if I shoot at 1200 ISO it would work.
![ออกพรรษาน้ำตาหล่น - แอน อรดี [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PFZtOcY9ONA/mqdefault.jpg)
você deve ter sido uma criança bem elevada na infância, percebo pelo nível de criatividade, parabéns... seu trabalho é feito com carinho.
Very informative video!
Love this deconstruction. So many elements coming into play to create the beautiful final image, perhaps starting with that amazing pair of boots. They remind me of the movie and stage production Kinky Boots. ❤
Thanks so much!
Amazing and gorgeous!
One more good video, thank you from southwestern France!
Such a treat to watch this.
Very interesting. Thank you for the breakdown.
Love the tones and backdrop.
Thank you!
Absolute great breakdown!
Nice breakdown of whole shoot, so it can be adapted to other needs.
Thanks so much!
Lovely setup
I don't use green that much but it worked well here! :D
@@lindsayadlerphoto , with these black and white dominant elements, it works surprisingly well :) Thank you, Lindsay, for this inspiration :) .
Nice!
good video
Thanks!
That green edge along you, Ms. Adler, what lens are you using that has such chromatic aberration?!
Irony.
You mean how I used a nanlite to create a green rim light? lol. not aberration
@@lindsayadlerphoto - I know. Just joking. But, have you actually maybe never seen chromatic aberration in photos? Once you see it, provided it's there, you cannot not see it any longer. No, your image does not have that aberration, but the green edge light gave the association.
I love your images and creativity, to be seriously clear.
@@jpdj2715 ahahaha okay I thought maybe. Yeah, I had some old lenses back in the day that had green/magenta around edges of tree branches-- was awful once you saw it. New lenses of course not having that problem. xo
@@lindsayadlerphoto - "of course" applies to your brand. Imagine a studio portrait that I would normally shoot at f/5.6 or f/8, but as a way to soften irregular skin already in camera, I shoot at f/1.4 with a very sharp lens that consequently has a very shallow depth of field. Magenta tinge on the cheek and a bright greenish tinge on the edge of the ear.
I migrated to mirrorless with much better lenses in 2019 that did not make me suffer from this any longer. Yes, stopping aperture down made it go away but you buy shallow depth of field to be able to use it.
(I'm in the McNally brand camp)
That CA and tint differences between different lenses were my recurring rant since 1975. But it was all predictable, and generally manageable, it had worldwide support, but I didn't need that because it never failed.
All those profoto lights add up to a lot of dollars! Do the opticals and gelled bare bulb require the full power? I’m more in the Wescott FJ400 price range on gear. I guess if I shoot at 1200 ISO it would work.