Luxman L-507Z vs Accuphase E-4000 King of AAVA super damping factor.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @olaniyi570
    @olaniyi570 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    But if you like the Luxman type sound, you can't get that from Accuphase.

  • @Zhorellski
    @Zhorellski ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Do Specifications equate to better sound?

  • @StukaUK
    @StukaUK ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Quite possibly the hardest 8 minute watch I’ve ever had.

    • @JNElectrics
      @JNElectrics  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you are one of the lucky ones

    • @fredfungalspore
      @fredfungalspore ปีที่แล้ว

      They are not expensive you Americans are fortunate that you pay sweet fanny Adams for 90*% of your Hifi... Welcome to the real World... as to what the rest of the world has to pay is absorbent.....So stop complaining

    • @rajeevananthan4771
      @rajeevananthan4771 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      😂😂😂 I feel you mate

    • @JNElectrics
      @JNElectrics  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what mate did you mean?

  • @aussie8114
    @aussie8114 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I had the Luxman 505z for a month before getting the Accuphase E4000. At first the Luxman sounded horrible but after about 40 hours run in it sounded a lot better. I found the Luxman had more bass, or maybe the bass was just a bit boomy at times. The upper mids were a bit forward for my liking but ok for instrumental or jazz, not so great for vocals. The VU meters were way too bright and had to be turned off at night or they would light up like a lighthouse.
    The E4000 is beautiful in every way.

    • @JNElectrics
      @JNElectrics  10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      great news mr.aussie.. thanks for comment

  • @mahasidha9
    @mahasidha9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think the Luxman L 509Z should have been the model used for comparison

    • @JNElectrics
      @JNElectrics  ปีที่แล้ว

      The Luxman L-509Z was not yet released when the content of this video was created.

    • @mahasidha9
      @mahasidha9 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JNElectrics Since in the US they are priced exactly the same and now that it is available do you think you might do that comparison; if it is not available to you to test given the new specs, which to my eye do not appear to be so different, intuitively do you think the E-4000 would win again? Is there a chance you will be reviewing the Mark Levinson 585.5 integrated with phono perhaps against the E-800?

    • @mahasidha9
      @mahasidha9 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JNElectrics I just remembered Esoteric has released the F-02 integrated with built in phono to replace the F-05 which had been on the market for 6 years; also priced the same as the Luxman L 509Z and the Accuphase E-4000; it would be amazing and wonderful if you did all 3 at the same time, then, at the end, you could rank them first place second place and third place

  • @Greenbluesforever-yj3el
    @Greenbluesforever-yj3el 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No schematics, how do you repair it when need it ? Very bad for both companies.

    • @JNElectrics
      @JNElectrics  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      thank you for watching. Just wait another 5 to 10 years, the two companies will release their schematics.

    • @aussie8114
      @aussie8114 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Accuphase don’t want you repairing it yourself.

    • @Greenbluesforever-yj3el
      @Greenbluesforever-yj3el 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aussie8114 yes true.

  • @LS-ti6jo
    @LS-ti6jo ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Video effects are distracting.

  • @hkgoodman888
    @hkgoodman888 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The video maker MUST consider putting subtitle. Basically impossible for me, as a non native English speaker, to understand his accent.

    • @bentleygt3716
      @bentleygt3716 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      did you turn on the CC ???

    • @JNElectrics
      @JNElectrics  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes i did
      Is there anything you don't understand?

    • @bentleygt3716
      @bentleygt3716 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      CC means Closed captioning. it is located at the bottom of the screen (on the opposite of Play) . just click on it , and you'll get the caption.

  • @dontcare563
    @dontcare563 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Both of these brands are too expensive in the US compared to Japan! The price for accuphase is over the top and not worth it! Both companies do make beautiful high-quality products!

    • @JNElectrics
      @JNElectrics  ปีที่แล้ว

      hi friend welcome

    • @eng-lokchua7819
      @eng-lokchua7819 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are expensive even in Japan too !!!

  • @aussie8114
    @aussie8114 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Also Accuphase has a tape output plus a DAC.

    • @JNElectrics
      @JNElectrics  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yes.. thanks for watching

  • @pascaltonton9000
    @pascaltonton9000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have never heard such stupid arguments to determine if one is better than the other (weights, dimensions, electricity consumption etc...). Sound is the most critical factor when you want to select an amplifier. An excellent amplifier delivers excellent sound. This should be your primary deciding element, so you will need to listen carefully before your purchase.

    • @JNElectrics
      @JNElectrics  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your comment, I will fulfill your wishes next time.

    • @CharlesWessel
      @CharlesWessel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Does passion make sense?

  • @stephencallil6512
    @stephencallil6512 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Got a Luxman l-540 @ an Aupphase e-306. They were both made in the mid 1990's.Prefer the sound of the Luxman but there's not much in it

    • @JNElectrics
      @JNElectrics  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      both are difference class.

  • @emerycomputer
    @emerycomputer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutely outstanding production quality; Hollywood beware!
    Both great amps, but... 45% MSRP (relative to Japan) increase in the USA/CANADA markets makes me look elsewhere.

  • @AudioElectronicsChicago
    @AudioElectronicsChicago ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good

  • @1999zrx1100
    @1999zrx1100 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Painfull to watch.

    • @JNElectrics
      @JNElectrics  ปีที่แล้ว

      why

    • @Zhorellski
      @Zhorellski ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JNElectrics remove the uneccesary effects.

  • @ade_sukardi5782
    @ade_sukardi5782 ปีที่แล้ว

    Watching L_507z n E4000

  • @miguelfernandezdiaz6592
    @miguelfernandezdiaz6592 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bueno, antes de salir este video, yo ya habia comprado el E4000. Es una joya insuperable. El gran inconveniente, para mucha gente, es el alto precio; a mi me parece desmesurado, pero no hay otra: o lo cojes, o lo dejas. Yo hice un serio esfuerzo, pero merece muy mucho la pena. Ahora me siento un privilegiado por tener esa suerte. Saludos.

  • @МАСТЕР-САМОДЕЛКИН-1972
    @МАСТЕР-САМОДЕЛКИН-1972 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ok

  • @annasipul
    @annasipul ปีที่แล้ว +2

    wtf?

  • @dmcanal6016
    @dmcanal6016 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ❤❤❤

  • @DiCarpio-yk9pd
    @DiCarpio-yk9pd 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Comparing Luxman to Accuphase itself is a huge disgrace and humiliation to Accuphase lol Luxman is a Chinese company and Accuphase is 100% Japanese. Strict parts and highest sound reproduction expectations. Luxman is just some commercial amplifiers you can find in the same category as Marantz or Denon. I would strongly recommend Denon PMA-SX11 or PMA-A110 if you need it with tone controls at only a fraction of the price In Japan, Accuphase is for serious audio enthusiasts and Luxman is for rich beginners that are clueless of what "audio" is all about LOL Now you know why Accuphase is more expensive.

    • @patrickverschuren3409
      @patrickverschuren3409 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Luxman is a Japanese company located in Yokohama, Japan. Production also takes place in Japan. You are misinformed I guess. Marantz, Denon and Yamaha are one class below the level of Accuphase and Luxman.

    • @aussie8114
      @aussie8114 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are wrong in many ways.

  • @rudibok9403
    @rudibok9403 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Luxman best of the best!!!