Toyota C-HR versus Nissan Juke (ENG) - Quirky Crossover Comparison
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 มิ.ย. 2024
- Toyota C-HR received a refresh for 2020, and the Nissan Juke 2020 is a brand new model. They both feature rather bold, if not controversial design. Toyota C-HR is a compact (by European standads) crossover, whereas the Nissan Juke is a B-Crossover, so at first this may seem like a curious choice of rivals. However in its second generation the Juke has grown, and it is now about the size of its hybrid rival.
Watch the comparison of the Toyota C-HR 2.0 Hybrid Dynamic Force 184 hp e-CVT and Nissan Juke 2020 1.0 DIG-T 117 hp DCT.
I started a new channel - Marek's Gear ( / mareksgear , where I'll be talking about the gear I use to make my shoe-string budget car reviews. Check it out, and please consider subscribing!
Toyota C-HR
Starting price: 18 290 euro
As tested: 32 000 euro
Nissan Juke
Starting price: 19 000 euro
As tested: 31 000 euro
Also watch:
Dacia Duster • 2018 Dacia Duster (ENG...
KIA Xceed • KIA Xceed - Designed B...
Lexus UX • Lexus UX - Urban Explo...
Mazda CX-30 • Mazda CX-30 - What Too...
Nissan Juke • Nissan Juke 2020 - No ...
Nissan Qashqai • Nissan Qashqai 1.3 DCT...
Renault Captur • Renault Captur 2020 - ...
Skoda Kamiq • Skoda Kamiq Crossover ...
Skoda Karoq • Skoda Karoq 1.0 TSI (E...
Toyota C-HR • Toyota C-HR 2020 2.0 H...
Volkswagen T-Roc • Volkswagen T-Roc (ENG)...
Follow me:
www.wieruszewski.com
/ marekdrives
/ mwieruszewski
/ marek_drives
#MarekDrives #ToyotaCHR #NissanJuke
Thanks for watching Marek Drives reviews. If you liked it, here are several other channels you may enjoy: Autophorie, Autogefühl, Bob Flavin, Carfection, Doug DeMuro, Driven Car Reviews, Fully Charged, TheSmokingTire, TheStraightPipes, VINwiki. - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
![[FULL EP.13] เซียนหรั่ง พา ไททศมิตร ลงเรือฝึกสกิลหว่านแห | เฮ็ดอย่างเซียนหรั่ง | One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EWFuf2Av0K0/mqdefault.jpg)
In Japan Toyota are rated higher than BMW and Nissan are considered the cheap end of the car range
I've been to Toyota and they have incredible build quality and very low defect levels
your a comedian right lol
@Ford Huxley I could do it in 10mins.
Nissan is the more sensible choice for this category of small crossover.
The nissan for me !
Certainly Nissan Juke. The design is unbeatable in the market.the design does not get old. I will get one for sure!
Loving these comparisons :)
Great presentation, as always I might add! Well I casted my vote on Nissan’s proposal, albeit I have to wait till September due to COVID lockdown.. thanks for keeping us updated!
Thanks. Fingers crossed it gets there on time or sooner!
I recently found your channel and I need to say I love your reviews!!!! Greetings from Montreal Canada!
Welcome aboard!
Wonderful country, Canada.
Marek Drives thank you :)
Great comparison i like the exterior of the CHR and the İnterior of the juke
Definitely the C-hr for the look, hybrid and 184ch ;-)
We have a 1.8 hybrid C-HR who comes after gen 1 Juke (1.6 petrol CVT). I love the new Juke look, but the small 1.2 is not as refined and efficient as the Toyota hybrid, interior looks a bit more fresh on the Juke but offers less space on the rear. And the C-HR ages very well and is very reliable, so we'll keep the C-HR.
You all prolly dont care but does any of you know of a trick to get back into an instagram account??
I stupidly forgot the password. I love any help you can give me
@Wallace Ramon instablaster =)
@Eliseo Emery i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site through google and I'm trying it out now.
Takes a while so I will reply here later with my results.
@Eliseo Emery It did the trick and I now got access to my account again. I'm so happy:D
Thank you so much, you saved my ass !
@Wallace Ramon You are welcome xD
CHR 1.8 Hybrid for me ! Had the juke & prefer the CHR
I test drove the CHR and loved it nice and smooth
My wife and I ( I mean I) are seriously considering the C-HR. I think the design is absolutely amazing. Yes the blind spot and rear view may not be great but I think that one gets used to it. Another small issue is the lack of boot space due to the battery placement. Yes that may come in handy on the rare occasion but more space is definitely of more use. Strange there’s no rear AC or charging units but that can easily be fixed with a double charging port in the middle hand rest compartment and putting the vents towards the center. I don’t mind the smaller windows and quite like the tinted aspect. The cabin looks awesome and design is very sleek. However I think the 8inch monitor should have been lowered a bit to give more view out of the windscreen. All in all I think I feel for the C-HR at first site and it’s hasn’t disappointed. It’s just the wife will have to agree on the fact that the 2.0 litre version is a much better choice for that extra umph on the motorway. Shame they didn’t lower their price point but for a compact SUV that is made by the most reliable manufacturers I don’t think you can go wrong.
Totally agree with you🙌🏼🙌🏼
Nissan Juke. very nice and aggresive design. specially combining the big digital and analog speedometer is a nice touch and attractive!
Nissan is really nice. I have never thought I would ever say this.
😂😂 does sound like an oxymoron
Toyota is far better, I test drove the Toyota and loved it!
Nice review, going with C-HR 1.8L more advantageous under Greek Eco-legislation. Dziekuje bardzo!
I just love the Toyota CH-R!
Nissan should give us more engines, at least their 1.33l. Would be nice!
I'd choose the Nissan. It looks nicer both from the interior and exterior. Moreover less expensive than the CH-R 😊
Toyota is quality, you get what you pay for.
nice review.. I just love the Toyota CH-R 😍
If Nissan Juke had 1.5 diesel & DCT ... 🔝🔝🔝
The fantastic video helped me decide. Juke, it is for me
Glad I could help
which is best in low consumption in version 2023 ? thanks
Just bought a new CH-R can´t wait to get it :P was looking at the juke. but the fact i get family discount on toyotas kinda sealed the deal for me =)
Thank you for your review! Can you explain what traffic sign recognition does and why is it useful to the driver? (pardon my ignorance)
It's a camera-based system, which reads basic traffic signs, like speed limits and road types, and displays appropriate information for the driver to be aware of the situation. Sometimes you may not notice a speed limit or pass so many different ones that you simply forget, which is the current one. This also includes road type information like dual carriageway vs. motorway (these are different types of roads in Poland with different speed limits), or special residential zones with lower speed limits.
Additionally the system can be supplemented by data stored in the navigation maps. So even if the camera doesn't read a sign for some reason, there is backup information in the sat nav.
@@MarekDrives Thanks for your detailed explanation! 👍
Juke is more stylish inside and out. If only their reliability can be improved.
My juke is great wish I had 2 of them
I appreciate the effort done by Toyota for the CHR, but the problem lately i'm seeing with Toyotas is their skyhigh price.. I have no doubt about their reliability though :) - for Nissan I see a lot of Renault in them which honestly puts me off.. that's why lately I'm more interested in Korean / Honda / Suzuki offerings :)
I would choose the Nissan Juke as I have been driving nissan cars since 1994 but I think Nissan has messed up with the engine aspect of it. It is good around town but as soon as you enter a faster road, it struggles to keep up with the traffic. I had it for a weekend to test it out, it's a shame as the car is a great car but if I had to choose between the CH-R and the Juke, I would have to choose the CH-R as the engine and the engine choice is much better.
I agree with you, would happily upgrade to a newer juke if they updated the engine. Really like the updated technology but I'd miss the 214hp and 4wd I have with the nismo rs
I'm totally sold on the headlight comparison. Consider quoting real time average fuel consumption as well.
If I didn't mention it here (sorry if I haven't) it's in the full reviews for each of the cars. I assume you mean real-life, rather than instant fuel consumption.
I had a Juke here in the US (New York City) and the engine was a 1.8 liter (turbocharged) producing 188 HP. What happened? The Juke you’re showing, albeit in Europe, pales in comparison!
CO2 emissions happened :-\
Nissan needs to offer a Hybrid or Electric version of the juke!!!
Why?
@@chefdeth7993 because
What country are you in? I want to import a left steering wheel Juke into the United States.
Marek do you think the CVT really lags a lot with the 2.0 litre? Do you think the design cries out look at me or it’s a matter of taste in design vs affordability?
The CVT doesn't lag, but also doesn't hold revs in place.
The design is a matter of taste. By Toyota standards this is very modern :)
Marek Drives thanks a lot for ur opinion. I’m test driving it tomorrow. Will see what I think more then.
We don't have the new juke in the US 😩 no choice but to go with chr but it's still good too for my preferences
In CHR there are air vents - AC - under the front seats!
The blind spots use wing mirrors then you have. No problems
after Qashqai I changed to CHR 1.8 Hybrid. I still like the Nissan design, but can´t understand, why they not offer the Hybrid or E-Power unit in Europe. I´ll never buy a 3 zylinder 1.0 turbo engine, sorry Nissan.
My CHR goes tomorrow when I pick a new Juke up. As for their differences, which is best, time and a few miles will tell.
I also of course would have wanted to test Juke with bigger engine but as tested over 20 cars lately I ended up to buy new Juke N-design with Adaptive cruise-pack and automatic box of course! For sure with little smaller engine it saves some of ur money and is anyway adequate and after compared with other cars I preferred to take this engine as now i got better and more stylish equipement :). Btw, anway Juke´s engine still "won" many cars with 140hp engines in driving feel. Of course there were many good cars of this level. Now I'm waiting my new Juke to arrive in couple of months!
Hi Marek, nice review. I’d pick the Nissan because boot space is bigger and the cockpit looks nicer. I wish they put the 1.5 Diesel engine though. Shhh, I said diesel.
Why don’t manufacturers do diesel hybrid set ups? It would be the perfect set up for me. Clean and economical in town while super frugal on long distance drives.
Actually some do, but it's very expensive.
Here are two:
th-cam.com/video/Lshlgx2gd2w/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/iJOBie9Z2Uk/w-d-xo.html (this is one of my first videos, so don't judge me too harshly :) )
Marek Drives that was very kind and thoughtful of you to send me those links Marek, thank you very much. The MB is fantastic but my pockets are not that deep unfortunately.
The Peugeot was nice and could be affordable secondhand. That was your first review, wow, you were a natural back then but I much prefer your humour in later videos. Keep up your good work, we all appreciate it. Stay safe and well. God bless.
@@MarekDrives and KIA/Hyundai has hybrid diesel set ups. For example KIA Sportage 48V.
**Keep up the great work!
Get Toyota nicer car all round and will last
Nice comparison, just a clarification at 8:10, 3 litre turbo or 3 cylinder turbo?
3-cylinder (0:40). My mistake.
I have a Juke 2020 and I love it a lot. It is lucky I can buy it in Taiwan.
Can't buy one in the states. I have a 2015 1.6 turbo. Modified, 220 hp(now) love it. Tech package is awesome on new models, but Nissan neutered it's engine. I'll take my 8 year old juke anyday over new models.
Damn very hard to choose which one is the best. Undecided 🤦♀️
I have the same problem !
The Nissan Juke for me
Juke...for sure
Best car on the market since 2019
Value for money
No cvt in juke.. good job Nissan..
Who at Toyota thought it would look good to put a giant tablet looking screen right on top of the dash. Looks like such an afterthought and I bet it gets in your way of visibility...
Nissan juke definitely for me
Now please do the same comparison between BMW X4 and GLC Coupé ;)
No need. Get the BMW.
@@MarekDrives is it THAT better ? even in small petrol engine (2.0i vs 200)?
Even more so.
@@MarekDrives thanks for your advice. I tested a 2.0i X3 and it was indeed surprisingly good.
Mercedes is great when it comes to diesels or larger displacement petrol engines. But out of the two I'd do with the X4 any day regardless of the engine.
Interesting, but please have someone else chose the music.. ;)
Yeap. The music used in this comparsion is a little beat disturbing.
Both 🤘👌
New Jeneration for me....is Juke...l love this design Nissan
3 liter turbo petrol (8:13)....that would be perfect....I prefer Toyota C-HR
Nissan Juke Forever ❤❤❤
i like them both, but availability in the american continent makes getting a modern Juke too hard and expensive. so the CH-R would be the sane choice. given the change i think i'd get the Juke, I own a first gen one and i quite like it plus long-term repairs would be cheaper due to lack of hybrid system.
CHR not enough car for the money, How much car would you buy for the the price of a new CHR. ( say 2 year nearly new car ). The Juke is still funky and appealing to a certain clientele.......
Next time just say how many % bigger/wider/shorter than the other car. It's a pain trying to do the maths while watching the video. It also lengthens the video a lot. I'm sure viewers would be able to get the official numbers elsewhere if you couldn't indicated on the video.
Damned if you do, damned it you don't. You wouldn't believe what viewers WOULD like me to put in the videos. Also, I'd mess up the percentages :)
The Nissan looks much better and it does not have the claustrophobic rear windows of the chr which makes life awful for rear seat passengers .
Neither of those eccentric and impractical cars could tempt me, but the Toyota, with its abysmal visibility, is the very last car I would ever consider!
So, the Nissan Juke has a three litre engine? Wonder why it has no mid range grunt then?
Ronald, not a 3 litre engine, it´s 1.0 litre, 3 cylinders.
@@victorpires9359 I was being ironic. Listen to the description at 8:13. Clearly states 3-litre!. I Know its a 1.0 litre 3 cylinder engine because I got one! :)
I like your reviews but why do you never reach a clear verdic and decision?? why not cut to the chase!??
if they Made the Nissan with larger space in he Back and four Piston engine i think it would be better but it have weaker chas base than Toyota, CHR is lovely but i don't like the design a lot but Toyota mean Reliability and better resale value
CHR ♥️
Nissan looks like small shopping city car for Miss Daisy. I will buy ch-r next week. For design and fuel economy.
The c-hr is less than 30k in Romania
That is a lot of money for a stupid 1 liter, a definite step back from the sweet, punchy 1.6 liter MR16DDT engine that was the newest engine from Nissan a few years ago. For the price of a base Jule you can buy a MG HS Base which has 17 inch alloy, 1.5 four cylinder turbo, Mid Size SUV with 7 year warranty. for an extra $1,000 the next trim gets synthetic leathers, key-less entry, Sat Nav, rear seat recline-able, lumber support for driver, LCD/analogue dash, climate control, chrome trim, fog lights, lots of USB charge ports, Leather steering wheel and gear knob, sport metal pedals, push button start, LED tail light, indicators on mirror, rear camera, and rear sensors, Driver Safety Suite systems, DRL, Adaptive cruise all for $30,990 Australia dollars Driver away and I forgot touchscreen 10 inch infotainment. I was Shocked I could not believe it... $31K drive away price
Juke wins for me.
Juke all the way!
8:11 3-liter turbo petrol?..
3 cylinder.
I wish i could afford to buy chr
Definitely the Nissan Juke !
7k more for the Toyota? I suppose that's all for the power train. It's a shame about the Nissan's engine. I mean that's a real dog. That would drive me insane. Beyond that, I think the Nissan is the nicer design and it doesn't make the rear passengers feel like they have been put into a dungeon. I would go for NEITHER of these. ;P
Thanks for the review!!
Here in Europe we're pretty much forced to buy cars with small engines or hybrids, as EVs are still expensive and in short supply (even more so, as the pandemic affected battery production). Mazda is trying to go its own way offering 2.0 an 1.5 naturally aspirated engines with diesel-like compression ratio, but even they had to 'castrate' their engines, and instead of offering the best of both worlds they offer the worst of petrols and diesels.
@@MarekDrives Mazda had to castrate their engine? You mean reduce the emissions by reducing the compression? I have to say, if I was shopping in this category the CX-3 CX-30 would be high on the list to test. They have uncluttered, clean designs.
Good thing they have android auotto
CH-Rs biggest problem is the Corolla. Costs the same, drives better.
Totally agree.
Cost less
For me the lack of power in the Juke is a joke no pun intended. Actually it was. I think they tried to compensate with the front and price but it’s doesn’t have the fine balance that Toyota managed.
What bollocks you talk. 117bhp is not a lack of power. The original Golf gti had 110 and was much heavier
CHR Orange Edition looks like baby version of Lamborghini Urus.
You're too kind :)
Nissan number one!!!!
The Toyota is Beautiful 💯
Ilovenissanjuke
only one engine in the Juke, a 3.0L Turbo Petrol ! 8:10 :-) :-)
CHR 😍
CHR for me
Toyota all day long because it’s 💯 percent Toyota. Where as the Nissan is....Renault.😳
To bold design group I would also add Citroën C3 Aircross/C4 Cactus and Peugeot 2008/3008. Neither french car has AWD/4WD or hybrid option, but has traction control system for various terrains. Design wise french has some design details who you can name it and not just splash of lines as on these Japanese cars. On the other hand these two have "reliability" image.
French cars break very quickly and feel like toys compared to a toyota
Nissan juke ❤❤❤
8:13 1L turbo
Is this a trick question???
The TOYOTA CHR is soooooo much more sexier looking. Love it!!
We saw one on the road the other day and were like WoW!
Well done Toyota! :) :)
Juke ❤️
So toyota i see what you are trying to do..the selling point of the next generation will be interior space
Nissan for me!
Nissan 👈👍👍👍👍👍
The nissan for me.
ill go with nissan.
Toyota everyday, no comparison
Smh it copied the CH R wayyyyy too much...its very easy to better a copy
This design is not exactly my cup of tea... Speaking of both of course.
I'd stay away from Nissan, own a 2016 Juke, engine had to be replaced at 38K due to oil leaking at timing chain plate and compression loss. Nissan replaced the engine with a brand new modified engine, and less than a month later, the oil leaked agaon, from the same place. So, car went back to Nissan again and re-sealed the leak on the timing chain plate. 2 weeks later...covid 19 came, lockdown so can't really tell if problem is gone. I'd definitely stay away from Nissan next time and would go for Toyota or Honda.
I own a 2014 Juke tekna since it was 2.5 years old, it is the worst car I've ever bought. The touch screen constantly crashes and reboots since I bought it, DAB struggles a lot I can't get half the channels my dad's BMW does, seats and plastics continuously squeak, at 27k miles the gearstick snapped inside and had to be replaced (£400) and most recently at 31k miles the rear washer jet won't operate anymore (yet to diagnose but I think maybe the pump)
The new Juke looks beautiful and has some exciting tech features but I would NEVER buy a Nissan again.
@@nicotang5583 I'm still stuck with it sadly. I've fallen for the 1.6 208gti. Easy 40mpg and 200bhp, beautiful interior. Just taken on a new job that will send me 2 hours down the M1 week by week though so I'm feeling like I should just stick with my low mileage diesel, though that doesn't count got as much with Nissan I don't think.
Going on what I've experienced with Nissan I'd go with Toyota.
Paint issues & burning oil on our fleet vehicles not good Nissan!!
Don't have those problems with the Toyota's
chr is the best
For me juke is better