The 5 deadliest Anti Ship Missiles in the World

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 470

  • @johnchristopher2375
    @johnchristopher2375 3 ปีที่แล้ว +675

    PHILIPPINES 🇵🇭 HAVE BRAHMOS MISSILE👋

    • @angshumandutta9654
      @angshumandutta9654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      CONTACT DRDO FOR MORE MISSILES ORDER.

    • @neerajr3777
      @neerajr3777 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Ask us boy , we will give you more🤭

    • @indeclinable26
      @indeclinable26 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      U

    • @okboy2455
      @okboy2455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      U have ground based one...this video is for anti ship🙄

    • @exurgemars
      @exurgemars 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@okboy2455 they're going for coastal defence batteries too, so I guess that counts as ASh

  • @kiyotakaaynokoji9387
    @kiyotakaaynokoji9387 3 ปีที่แล้ว +135

    Bhrmos range already extend to 500km

    • @Military-TV
      @Military-TV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Here about BrahMos th-cam.com/video/3o2B3M2TXLk/w-d-xo.html

    • @irshadadil4507
      @irshadadil4507 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      U r right for the land varient it's already 400+ .The range of 290km is for the export varient .This guy really need to research 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @SB-jc4vf
      @SB-jc4vf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      For Indian version soon it will be extended to 800 Km.

    • @harishankarkandankumarath9922
      @harishankarkandankumarath9922 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@Military-TV That was the original range before India joined MTCR, after joining it, Brahmos range has been extended from 290 to 300+ first then 450+ KM version was recently tested. Currently work is done to extend the range to 800Km followed by 1200-1500 Km. Export version that Philippines is acquiring is under 300 Km

    • @sairajgaonkar209
      @sairajgaonkar209 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He doesn't know that because of lack of knowledge

  • @lunarnite3495
    @lunarnite3495 3 ปีที่แล้ว +207

    Funny thing is that India has all the missiles here or are procuring 😂
    Brahmos: Already available in various versions for all the armed forces.
    LRASM: Being integrated into the P8I Neptune in the future
    NSM: Being integrated to Indian Navy's MH-60R helicopters
    Klub: Already available on a few Indian Navy's russian made vessels
    XASM-3: India is building something very similar to this missile (known as the STAR missile)

    • @tulsiramupadhaya9854
      @tulsiramupadhaya9854 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      🇮🇳😤🤗😎

    • @rohan1748
      @rohan1748 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We have to rely on accurate and high speed missile s which cannot be intercepted as our immediate enemies are unfortunately close by and we lack in stealth technology like bombers and submarines to go into the enemy territory
      Hence Agni 5 with mirv is also very critical

    • @tulsiramupadhaya9854
      @tulsiramupadhaya9854 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      China is Crying

    • @alphaomega311
      @alphaomega311 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      In a war against China India would be America's best ally

    • @KoishiVibin
      @KoishiVibin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alphaomega311
      honestly
      It'd be easier to supply India with some guns and see who wins, then mop up one way or the other
      AMERICA
      WORLD... janitors.

  • @prabhashjha7796
    @prabhashjha7796 3 ปีที่แล้ว +140

    It's is actually IAF's Sukhoi-MKI not MK1. I stands for India variant

  • @krishanuphukan80
    @krishanuphukan80 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    You have absolutely no idea of the main reason why the Brahmos is considered the most dangerous Anti Ship missile. It's not the speed of Mach 3, it's not even the fact that it has enough kinetic energy to literally break a destroyer sized ship in half during tests, it's not even the fact that it has an accuracy of 2 meters during testing and as if all this was not enough, it's not even the fact that it has 3 redundant systems of every single electronic part inside it, which means that even if it's jammed or hit by an EMP or 2, it can still keep going as if nothing happened.
    No. The main reason that Brahmos is so respected and feared is because it has the ability to perform 3 dimensional S Maneuvers in the terminal phase at Mach 3 which makes CIWS systems useless and most Missile defence systems very very difficult to counter it. A missile that flies straight is easy to counter with current technology. But a missile that moves randomly in a Zig Zag manner is very difficult to stop. Especially when it moves at Mach 3.

    • @Military-TV
      @Military-TV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Because BrahMos very special, our team make special video about BrahMos th-cam.com/video/3o2B3M2TXLk/w-d-xo.html

    • @loyalist5736
      @loyalist5736 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only thing is fast means here i am on radar .

    • @sandhugaming117
      @sandhugaming117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bro it is not an shell fired from canon

    • @theironduke1175
      @theironduke1175 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I believe the NSM also has the ability to do 3 dimensional maneuvers in its terminal phase(Please correct me if I am wrong)

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@theironduke1175 Yeah, but not at Mach 3.

  • @andrewlambert7246
    @andrewlambert7246 3 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    The fact that the Japanese are developing a hypersonic missile proves that the Bramhos concept is valid and dangerous.

    • @direwolf7491
      @direwolf7491 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It is dangerous and it's evolving. Better and better versions are coming out of it.

    • @iemranjuffri4827
      @iemranjuffri4827 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's cover for a nuclear delivery system.

    • @sanatanihindu383
      @sanatanihindu383 ปีที่แล้ว

      We are also currently working on Brahmos 2 which is Hypersonic missile is under development range of Brahmos 2 will be 1500km with speed of 10mach

  • @ravenmoon5111
    @ravenmoon5111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    Glad to see India and Philippines have BraMos. Great missile that China and Pakistan should be very frightened of.

    • @ravenmoon5111
      @ravenmoon5111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @bahram bassiri
      India can hold its ground just fine. As far as the Philippines goes, as China continues to try to steal the SCS, the surrounding countries will continue to find common ground against them.
      We see the strengthening of those allies as a positive force to prevent Chinese aggression

    • @ravenmoon5111
      @ravenmoon5111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @bahram bassiri
      Lol,
      Sure Sure...
      You just keep holding your breath on that one.
      In time, China will do to Pakistan what they are doing to Muslims in their own country...
      I wonder what Allah will have to say about you and yours being okay with that

    • @Ayogorkhali1815
      @Ayogorkhali1815 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @bahram bassiri yeah good joke man .

    • @yang5159
      @yang5159 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ignorant India missiles outmatch by 5 types China missiles

    • @mikel4690
      @mikel4690 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nothing prevents a hindu from dreaming great things - from the ground of his slum :)

  • @siddhantroy9539
    @siddhantroy9539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    That is su 30 mk I ....not mk 1.....the i represents the indian variant of su 30s

    • @drabhinay1846
      @drabhinay1846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah that’s what I’m confused

    • @Sammy58328
      @Sammy58328 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just like Su 30MKK (China) and Su 30 MKM (Malaysia).

    • @satyakichatterjee4229
      @satyakichatterjee4229 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah👍👍

    • @nucleargandhi101
      @nucleargandhi101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Su-30 MKI is also the best and most advanced version of the generic Su-30. The Su-30 MKI has characteristics which can rival even the likes of Su-35 and it can be pitched against Uzs F-15 strike eagle.

    • @heergruppenfuhrer
      @heergruppenfuhrer 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      how about indonesian su30 mk2

  • @Shanu_1113
    @Shanu_1113 3 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    ❤️ from 🇮🇳

    • @devvarshney7768
      @devvarshney7768 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jai hind 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @vishalkadu7688
    @vishalkadu7688 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Brahmos is the most destructive missile built ever .. versatile to be launched from sea, air and land. The next version would have range of 450+ KM.. Kudos to drdo team

    • @jinsongeorge8312
      @jinsongeorge8312 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No. Ballistic missiles still stands top in mass destruction category. Brahmos is only the best cruise missile

    • @vishalkadu7688
      @vishalkadu7688 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@jinsongeorge8312 in terms of anti ship missile context I was taking about Brahmos.. since video was about anti ship missile..

    • @devvarshney7768
      @devvarshney7768 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🇮🇳

    • @hk8728
      @hk8728 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Zircon is more deadly.

    • @sanatanihindu383
      @sanatanihindu383 ปีที่แล้ว

      Recently india successfully test Land based Brahmos missile with upgrade range of 800km , next Target is 1000km range and Brahmos 2 which is Hypersonic missile is under development range of Brahmos 2 will be 1500km with speed of 10mach

  • @lenkautsugi5747
    @lenkautsugi5747 4 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Go brahmos

  • @rishithaurora
    @rishithaurora 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Only option you have left when brahmos is fired... Is to brace!

    • @udontknowme7798
      @udontknowme7798 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Russia didn't give India that tech without know how to shoot it down. And so do China and Iran plus plus. Mach 2.8 is nothing compared to a S-200-300-400 and S-500, C-400, a load of Iranian anti air systems!

    • @bharathyadav1589
      @bharathyadav1589 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@udontknowme7798 its a joint venture, funding is mainly from india

    • @bharathyadav1589
      @bharathyadav1589 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@udontknowme7798 s400, india has that too

    • @exurgemars
      @exurgemars 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@udontknowme7798 Russia didn't "give" India shit. Its a JV. Educate yourself.

    • @exurgemars
      @exurgemars 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@udontknowme7798 also, good luck mounting an S400 on a ship. And if you even do manage to somehow do that, Brahmos is sea skimming.😂

  • @Ayogorkhali1815
    @Ayogorkhali1815 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Bro after upgrading brahmos range is 650 km range now. Also it's speed is 3.5 mach not 2.8

  • @theflamecoreguy7929
    @theflamecoreguy7929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    India also developed hstdv and it's successfully tested it will be the next generation of brahmos this technology is used in hypersonic BrahmOs NG which have speed of 7 mach which makes india again owner of fastest cruise missile in the world🇮🇳

  • @tarzan12345
    @tarzan12345 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The deadliest ASM is hand-down the P-360 Neptune from Ukraine. All others are "deadly" on-paper while the Neptune actually sank the largest warship since WW2.

    • @mmccarthy9458
      @mmccarthy9458 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Neptune is just a copy of the Harpoon and the Moskva was effectively a block ship. By all accounts, the scanning and tracking radars werren't even on, none of the VLS cannister tubes were open and the SA-8 arm launchers had no missiles on them. All of this means that the Russian CG had no emissions and no clue any missiles were incoming, essentially a block ship.

    • @aarshbhushan1062
      @aarshbhushan1062 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mmccarthy9458 exactly
      But who will tell this to these stupid hard ass people who just don't want to listen the truth
      The time moskva was hit she had nothing with her
      She was heading back to Sevastopol when the Ukrainian's got her

    • @gang4001
      @gang4001 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, they were great missiles. But I think the Harpoon missiles did 1up them. Those things were VERY good

  • @ksriri
    @ksriri 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Like Japan Hypersonic Brahmos is under development. The HSTDV (Hypersonic Test Drive Vehicle), a housing that helps the missile to achieve Hypersonic speeds up to Mach 7 with an extended range of 500kms is rumoured to be ready by 2023. It'll be a major threat to even Aircraft Carriers

    • @rajatdani619
      @rajatdani619 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      U mean- Hypersonic technology Demonstrator vehicle.

    • @ksriri
      @ksriri 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rajatdani619 yep that's a demonstrator whos tech is used for Brahmos

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rajatdani619 The demonstrator is already flying successfully. After a few more tests, work on hypersonic cruise missile based on that scramjet will begin in earnest.

  • @Albert-III
    @Albert-III 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Need to remake this video with the neptune included

  • @pinakeshnegi771
    @pinakeshnegi771 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    bro its SU30MKI not SU30MK1

  • @1abhishekbhuyan695
    @1abhishekbhuyan695 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Brahmos 1500
    Surya hypersonic 700 is the most dangerous missiles
    #DRDO

    • @udontknowme7798
      @udontknowme7798 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No it is not

    • @1abhishekbhuyan695
      @1abhishekbhuyan695 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@udontknowme7798 its hypersonic missiles ok dont believe we dont care.

    • @harnoorsingh2866
      @harnoorsingh2866 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@1abhishekbhuyan695 so is it the only hypersonic missile in world? Ok don't believe no one care.

    • @harshsaxena9207
      @harshsaxena9207 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@harnoorsingh2866 bro hypersonic missile is operational in Russian military.

    • @harnoorsingh2866
      @harnoorsingh2866 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@harshsaxena9207 so what? Did I say it is not operational in Russia

  • @geoben1810
    @geoben1810 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The NSM seems like it could be very effective in ship to ship combat.

  • @saurabhdang7307
    @saurabhdang7307 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    India is currently working on LRSAM which will have 1500 km range MAC speed of 3.5 will cost half of Brhamos

  • @hmararmsindia
    @hmararmsindia ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Comparison to BRAHMOS and Hypersonic missile ,
    The BRAHMOS is still the best 90+ accuracy rate and fast , whereas
    Hypersonic missiles are the fastest but
    hit target accuracy rate has very low 30+ only

  • @biswajitkar5741
    @biswajitkar5741 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    BROHMOS 2?? MACH 7

  • @lochnessmonster5149
    @lochnessmonster5149 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Skunk Works has a hypersonic missile and a stealth missile. The next step is a hypersonic stealth missile.

  • @SPEARHEADGLOBAL
    @SPEARHEADGLOBAL 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Were is my diy missile?

  • @FunfusionDas
    @FunfusionDas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Love from India 👍

  • @jaredevans8263
    @jaredevans8263 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about the Russian Zircon or P700 Shipwreck missiles?

    • @davidspencer7254
      @davidspencer7254 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Aren't most of those now at the bottom of the black sea on the Moskva?

    • @jaredevans8263
      @jaredevans8263 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@davidspencer7254 no the Moskva carried sixteen P500 Sandbox anti ship missiles, which Russia likely has hundreds or more in supply

    • @aarshbhushan1062
      @aarshbhushan1062 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidspencer7254 get some brain bruh🤡

    • @davidspencer7254
      @davidspencer7254 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aarshbhushan1062 Yeah that really told me "bruh" .
      🤣

  • @ritvikkaundal1883
    @ritvikkaundal1883 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    India have both club and brahmos

  • @sagagarwal
    @sagagarwal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Keyboard warriors he is talking abt anti ship missiles and not hypersonic or ballistic missiles so stop naming shauyra or tzircon in this list

  • @gorilla1354
    @gorilla1354 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Brahmos has been successfully tested on Pakistan

    • @hmararmsindia
      @hmararmsindia ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ye Pakistan never detected using China Air Defence.
      After two days some civilians reports the debris to govt authority.
      That why China is really afraid of Brahmos.

  • @jubinmathew7091
    @jubinmathew7091 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The world is on save hands...🔥

  • @NBeaver-bx4yl
    @NBeaver-bx4yl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Yeah NSM will be on the new Canadian type 26 frigates !

    • @taruntripathi
      @taruntripathi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Canada has a navy 😳

    • @NBeaver-bx4yl
      @NBeaver-bx4yl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@taruntripathi yup ! Small and old but soon to be small but modern ;)
      Considered the 15th best, not amazing, but its something

    • @taruntripathi
      @taruntripathi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@NBeaver-bx4yl Canada is making a mistake by trusting Trudeau

    • @NBeaver-bx4yl
      @NBeaver-bx4yl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@taruntripathi hummm, maybe yes, maybe no, we'll see I guess

    • @steveabrams777
      @steveabrams777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@taruntripathi you did not know about the RCN but you knew about Trudeau ... troll?

  • @terryfreeman1018
    @terryfreeman1018 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    WILL YOU PLEASE use standard measurements. I LOVE your channel. You're the best.

  • @victoryfirst2878
    @victoryfirst2878 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Such a shame I was not able to work on these great missiles for the ultimate glory of the homeland. They seem more than adequate.

  • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
    @tgsgardenmaintenance4627 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If Zircon works as advertised, it will be a game changer!!

  • @friendlyatheist9589
    @friendlyatheist9589 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Check out the shaurya hybrid missile system

  • @okansengul7949
    @okansengul7949 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    where is atmaca missile?

  • @vishnualappy3033
    @vishnualappy3033 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    😍IN😍 ❤

  • @oppavan7720
    @oppavan7720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Republic of INDIA❤️❤️

  • @videoonfire
    @videoonfire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Brahmos has an range of 800 kms already it was limited to 300 on paper due to missile control that russia has signed and india has also signed he missile control tech transfer in 2021

  • @bindhub4049
    @bindhub4049 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No.1 brahmos 😛🥳

  • @abymathew295
    @abymathew295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Now Brahmos can fly upto 700 kilometers at Mach 4 speed...🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳

  • @guy4814
    @guy4814 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Correction brahmos speed is more than 3 mach

  • @QueenDaenerysTargaryen
    @QueenDaenerysTargaryen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing

  • @kondeamani5106
    @kondeamani5106 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about zircon?

  • @rathodjayeshsinh5457
    @rathodjayeshsinh5457 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love my India

  • @SJRinne
    @SJRinne 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anti-ship missiles shouldn't be rated by their deadlines, because they are not designed to have a high lethality rate. They are designed to cause maximal damage to large naval vessels.

  • @watermirror
    @watermirror 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    "& the deadliest antiship missile is NSM"
    NSM is deadly but hard to really measure which of those 5 is deadliest. More like an ad for NSM as the deadliest 😅

  • @rathanapparathanappa5077
    @rathanapparathanappa5077 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The BRAHMOS missile new version has been increased to 800kms now.

    • @sankalpsuryavanshi4788
      @sankalpsuryavanshi4788 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's in testing not inducted

    • @rathanapparathanappa5077
      @rathanapparathanappa5077 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sankalpsuryavanshi4788 whatever it is today or tomorrow it will be inducted. All the necessary aspects has been achieved.

    • @Arunxolo
      @Arunxolo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nhi 80000000000 km rage ha bc Kush b

  • @akshaykamble6480
    @akshaykamble6480 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brahmos 🔥🔥🇮🇳🇷🇺

  • @himankan
    @himankan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think Shaurya needs a mention, a hypersonic semi cruise missile with a complicated trajectory

    • @sagarkothari5218
      @sagarkothari5218 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      its ballistic. not so accurate.....

  • @kingghidorah9505
    @kingghidorah9505 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yj 12 is the carrier killer deadliest anti ship missile.

  • @gandhikumar2956
    @gandhikumar2956 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    India, the next military superpower.

  • @warrior_singh111
    @warrior_singh111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    ???!!!
    Submarine version is being developed already

    • @shinchan1873
      @shinchan1873 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Will be integrated in P75i submarines

    • @AnuragDDethe
      @AnuragDDethe 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It has already been tested I believe off of underwater pontoons, the only limitation is that no current sub can carry the Brahmos as no current sub has vertical launch tubes built for cruise missiles, though maybe the Arihant class SSBN could maybe fire it but it is built for carrying nuclear ballistic missiles. Unlike other sub launched cruise missiles like the Harpoon or Klub, the Brahmos is wider than 533cm and so cannot fit into a standard torpedo tube of a submarine which is why the only sub launched missiles we have are the Klub used on the Sindhughosh/Kilo class sub, the Harpoon Block-2 used on our Shishumar/Hs209 class and the Exocet missile used off of our Kalvari/Scorpene class subs. Which is why the Indian Navy did not go ahead with more Scorpenes but rather opted for the P75I project which will have vertical launch tubes big enough to carry Brahmos and maybe even Nirbhay missile in the future.

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AnuragDDethe Not holding my breath for VLS on P-75I at this point. Most likely, we'll have to go indigenous route with the P-76 SSKs. Work on developing P-76 already seems to have started with the Navy calling for pumpjet propulsors that can propel 5000 ton boats.

  • @pachuz5696
    @pachuz5696 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2021 brahmose = mach 3.5 and a range of 800 km

  • @gvelden1
    @gvelden1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very important missing information is how the top 5 was determineren. I.e. what formula? Best is indicate as nasm but nr. 1 is brahmos. Is the top 5 reversed?

  • @TheMemeDynamics
    @TheMemeDynamics 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not P-700 Granit....

  • @Lucas-ih1vt
    @Lucas-ih1vt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Atmaca?

    • @nazgul6761
      @nazgul6761 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Atmaca yazılım olarak hepsinden daha iyi :D Ama işte işlerine gelmiyor. Menzil olarakta KTJ 3200 ile daha uzun menzillere ulaşacak Allah ın izni ile.

    • @Lucas-ih1vt
      @Lucas-ih1vt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nazgul6761 gerçekler TV öyle demiş olabilir ama biraz gerçekçi olmak lazım.Abd yıllarıdır bu işi yapıyor ve tak diye onları geçemeyiz ama yine de Atamca çok teklonojik

    • @nazgul6761
      @nazgul6761 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Lucas-ih1vt Bildiğime göre Atmaca Harpoon dan daha uzak menzile ve daha teknolojik donanıma sahip. Araştırmıştım çünkü. Saygılar

  • @astratr3b345
    @astratr3b345 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    how many ships are those missiles have ever sink ?
    on what basis make them deadliset ? just because arms makers say so

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      More than you ever will.

  • @angshumandutta9654
    @angshumandutta9654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    NO Ballistic TALKS HERE ONLY CRUISE

  • @NO28Amber
    @NO28Amber 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    no the information is wrong indian missile have achieved rang about 300km from land and in air missile has cover the distance about 4,000KM not 400Km

    • @azmicaseer8584
      @azmicaseer8584 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even Tomahawk don't have the range of 4,000KM 🙄 Brahmos newly updated range is 650KM may be in future they will update the range

  • @stangarcia
    @stangarcia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Top

  • @chandrachurniyogi8394
    @chandrachurniyogi8394 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it's not Sukhoi Su-30 MK One!!! it's Sukhoi Su-30 MKI (I for India)!!! there's also Su-30 MKM (M for Malaysia) & Su-30 MKK (K for Kenya)!!!

  • @thepny_chasseur_de_tricera5361
    @thepny_chasseur_de_tricera5361 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nothing about exocet ?

  • @CarsandCrashes1
    @CarsandCrashes1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    he didnt put zircon, kaliber or kinzhal bc then russia would be first and he wouldnt want that

  • @musobalawrence1466
    @musobalawrence1466 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Reaction time can be increased by detecting the missile at launch, mid flight phase. Am sure technology to track these missiles exists thanks to military satellites up there, so no one can claim the element of surprise.

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pffffft. Hilarious. Good luck trying to track a cruise missile via a satellite. Ask the Americans who are having trouble creating satellites that can do that to hypersonic missiles. Then understand that a supersonic cruise missile would have a MUCH smaller IIR signature, making it impossible even for the satellites that the most powerful and advanced nation plans to field in the near future.

  • @whitebeard1930
    @whitebeard1930 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Here the westerner's try to ,defame brahmos ,brahmos is twice better than what he said

    • @loyalist5736
      @loyalist5736 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If they wanted to defame it it wouldn't be in the list lol

  • @electrowizard2658
    @electrowizard2658 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    only 28 sec for brahmos ??

  • @RandyBaumery-s4i
    @RandyBaumery-s4i 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Usa now has a Mach 4 anti-ship missile

  • @user-vatnik_petrov
    @user-vatnik_petrov 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    New era of hypersonic weapons allready in service. This video considering OLD DAYS SYSTEMS

    • @user-vatnik_petrov
      @user-vatnik_petrov 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@piepile6328 Russians weapons gets approved only after complex of test. Have you heard that russian gun or missile failed?

    • @gotanon8958
      @gotanon8958 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Except that hypersonic weapons system have been around for decades by that i mean the german v2 is considered the first hypersonic weapon...

    • @user-vatnik_petrov
      @user-vatnik_petrov 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gotanon8958 New concept "hypersonic" this not only speed more then 5M. Most important NONBALLISTIC trajectory that prevent missile from interception. Impossible to calculate trajectory. For example: target at distance 900km. For Tomahawk it will take ONE HOURE to reach with good chance to be intercepted. For Russian Kinzhal it will takes 5 minutes ( one cigaretеe) WITH NO CHANCE (missile dodge threads) to intercept

    • @user-vatnik_petrov
      @user-vatnik_petrov 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Jack ripper Who told you that? Sofaexpert...

    • @user-vatnik_petrov
      @user-vatnik_petrov 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Jack ripper By the way, the first generation of Russian Hypersonic 9M723 missile put in service in 2006

  • @templewilliams1982
    @templewilliams1982 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No surprise here that the u.s is lacking in anti ship missles

    • @gotanon8958
      @gotanon8958 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because we have a more effective weapon its called the submarine fleet.

    • @exurgemars
      @exurgemars 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Jack ripper they're all sub-sonic, yes?

    • @ravenmoon5111
      @ravenmoon5111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@exurgemars
      By design. NSM and LRSM are smart, stealth missiles. NSM was top on the list and LRSM has a longer range than any of them.
      Hypersonics isn’t the only game in town.

  • @mmccarthy9458
    @mmccarthy9458 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Harald Hadrada would be proud of Norway for the NSM. I am curious how the 5th generation ability works out, no emissions to detect and track targets works out. Most ships want to limit emissions up to the point a war starts, but I would think the NSM isn't really any stealthier than a Harpoon or other existing sea skimmer if ships are emitting constantly and tracked by AWACS or helo radar.

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Smokeless propulsion works more for AAMs or ATGMs, like the Indian Astra BVRAAM. Not sure if its good for ships to have such stuff.

  • @30jugalvbiju74
    @30jugalvbiju74 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    *su 30 mki

  • @cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647
    @cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And here the world thought Japan was their friend think again, and neither is the Fatherland with Chancellor Merkel

  • @taiyipan3138
    @taiyipan3138 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    really? not a single mention of DF-21 carrier killer missiles?

    • @gotanon8958
      @gotanon8958 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Its a ballistic missile not a cruise missile.

    • @warlord7018
      @warlord7018 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes b'coz it's made in China so it belongs to top 5 worst anti ship missiles list.

    • @mohhammedrafeee203
      @mohhammedrafeee203 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@warlord7018 😂

    • @DEEPAK-JOC
      @DEEPAK-JOC 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's copy toy 😂😂

  • @hellz2416
    @hellz2416 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's SU 30 MKI not MK1

  • @jamesharris184
    @jamesharris184 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The deadliest ones are the ones we don't even know about.

  • @fifi8100
    @fifi8100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a Norwegian i must say: that the Norwegian citizens have no idea howe much blood we have on our hands

  • @alexandersamoylov3838
    @alexandersamoylov3838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Не понятно, зачем на 0.21 показан парад американского экспедиционного корпуса во Владивостоке в 1919 году?

  • @TheNonAlignedGuy
    @TheNonAlignedGuy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's su30 mki not mk1.
    Brahmos 1st variant is 290 km, when india was not a member of missile control regime. Now india is a member and current brahmos missile has 450+ km range, also 800+ km missile is on the way.
    Another fact is , I think you forgot about some Chinese and Russian missiles. And don't forget about brahmos II (currently land attack varient is in developing but a naval version will soon follow the land version) ,But when it comes out it will be best anti ship missile like the brahmos I once where.
    Don't get me wrong, brahmos is still very good. But missile technology of other nations has just caught up with it. That's all.

  • @Lonewolf-hn3fi
    @Lonewolf-hn3fi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey you forgot Zircon

  • @theironduke1175
    @theironduke1175 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does it seem the farther down I read these comments the longer range of the Brahmos gets XD

  • @shanonly4u
    @shanonly4u 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where are Chinese aircraft career killer missile?

  • @vaibhavcharatkar
    @vaibhavcharatkar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's su 30 mki not mk1

  • @anndroid8734
    @anndroid8734 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No zirkon ?

    • @ravenmoon5111
      @ravenmoon5111 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think they left it off because there are serious concerns about Zircon’s ability to track an evading target. It’s speed supposedly causes a plasma field around it making it hard to impossible to pick ou on radar, but that same field will work both ways. It cannot receive satellite data on its glide run, not can it use any form of radar, thermal or visual tracking. It must pick up its target at the apex of its flight and then hope to catch it by speed before it can evade.
      It’s an impressive weapon, but the Russians themselves admitted it still has growing pains

    • @anndroid8734
      @anndroid8734 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ravenmoon5111 they should put good AI in the zircon, so it can use as 'fire and forget' missile with high accuracy

    • @ravenmoon5111
      @ravenmoon5111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@anndroid8734
      Perhaps. It’s a technical marvel, but I think it’s still years away from true deployment.
      Just something to think about regarding Zircon or our Arrow or The Chinese DF series. If these missiles were truly going to make surface ships vulnerable to unstoppable attack at long range, no one, not the US, not the Chinese and Certainly not the Russians would be planning more large ships. But that isn’t what we see.
      That alone tells me that the era of smart, long range unstoppable ship killers isn’t very close to the horizon yet.

    • @Blackreaper95
      @Blackreaper95 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anndroid8734 no point in putting AI in a missile that will be destroyed with the target

  • @adarshgangwar2285
    @adarshgangwar2285 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So this makes India the fastest attacker. Not even giving 30 sec to the other countries to tackle it.

  • @legionofyuri
    @legionofyuri 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok I thought the video said "deadliest" and assumed it was actual confirmed uses/hits of said missiles.

  • @terryfreeman1018
    @terryfreeman1018 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gotta love them crazy Japanese.

  • @fliped2
    @fliped2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Tsirkon?

    • @Military-TV
      @Military-TV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We make special topic about Zircon sir watch here th-cam.com/video/F7SKc7mC3cs/w-d-xo.html

    • @kk-ji8vw
      @kk-ji8vw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Military-TV eee where is iranian haj fars (range:700km )

  • @matthewhuszarik4173
    @matthewhuszarik4173 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How many of these missiles have proven themselves in actual combat? Military tests and press releases have proven to be based more on wishful thinking than actual performance.

    • @harsh3277
      @harsh3277 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Recently brahmos invaded pakistan and chinese air defence system couldn't destroy it before landing
      Also that missile got inside 124 km in Pakistan

    • @SeanMirrsen
      @SeanMirrsen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Klub is the export version of the Kalibr missiles.

  • @tentimesful
    @tentimesful 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the nr. 1 missile failed at destroying the target...

  • @jonmopjovi2734
    @jonmopjovi2734 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Will any of these go to Ukraine? Aren't land based systems vulnerable to air attack?

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aren't men vulnerable to bullets, tanks to ATGM and drones to a fcuking half-serious AD?

  • @Lea_Kaderova
    @Lea_Kaderova 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You forgot Kh-32.

  • @ronielfabroa8242
    @ronielfabroa8242 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bias analysis always... How about russian zircon missile which have 8-10 mach speed..

    • @bharathyadav1589
      @bharathyadav1589 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thats a hypersonic missle..and it is under testing as well as brahmos 2

    • @Zingalamadumi
      @Zingalamadumi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bharathyadav1589 you are ignorant

  • @deraltenase7602
    @deraltenase7602 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    RBS-15 MK4 by SAAB

  • @randoviral8113
    @randoviral8113 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Zircon?

  • @Pucha83
    @Pucha83 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It not SU 30 MK1, It's SU 30 MKI, I for India

  • @loyalist5736
    @loyalist5736 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Royal Navy needs LRASM.

  • @justwhenithought
    @justwhenithought 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Glad Japan is on our side. Watch out for new weapons, including fighter jets, coming out of Japan in the next few years.

  • @davidkumarmaxi6843
    @davidkumarmaxi6843 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Su 30 mki not mk1