Ukrainian war couldn’t of come at a better time for the west tbh (economic decline after COVID and americas move to secure the European energy market, who gained from blowing up nordstream, who even has the capability to conduct secret underwater ops hint a certain Seawolf Class Sub) Kick Russias ass via a proxy, get to test out how they’d perform against Russia with their equipment. The most important of all it’s all free advertisement for the defence industry. (By defence industry I do mean Lockheed, BAE and Baryaktar).
We planned for it with our new CD212 submarines being built in Germany, they skipped and reintroduced a second time. Norway is very secretive on the issue.
I'm really confused. This looks like a fanboy site from the outside, but actually has content that is both rational and of reasonable substance. Nice job.
@@ozjohn39 they not too short range to defend the Taiwan strait which is narrow. They also not to slow to target the assault ships carrying all the Chinese marines and their equipment.
@@ozjohn39 Taiwan has their own designs of subsonic and supersonic missiles and you don't need missiles to be supersonic to engage the assault ships crossing the Taiwan strait. The strait is 180Km wide at it's widest point the standard Navel strike missile can go 200 Km another version can go 250Km. It has more than enough range to be effective and has stealth built into its design and also does evasive manoeuvres as it closes with the target.
Yes and no. A newer Harpoon type is being developed but the NSM is for lighter missions. The difference between the two warheads is that the Harpoon has a warhead twice the weight of the NSM.
Good morning, I subscribed to your channel and thanks for the very interesting videos I have created a belief that in general it is much easier to attack than to protect oneself Any protection system will always have limited potential, weak points that these latest generation missiles will always be able to hit This consideration inevitably leads to a situation called ESCALATION And when a country that possesses nuclear weapons like Russia feels backed into a corner, in my opinion, it will start using tactical nuclear weapons. What happens next is hard to imagine
@@powerkingez9682 Israel Aerospace Industries is reportedly working on a Gabriel V Advanced Naval Attack Missile, with an advanced active multi-spectral seeker designed for cluttered littoral environments. As of 2020, this variant is deployed by the Finnish and Israeli navies. Range is claimed to be more than 200 km to 400 km. Successful test firing of the Gabriel V was conducted by the Israel Defense Forces on September 21st 2022. Gabriel 5 is a 5th generation anti ship missile. Blue spear derived from Gabriel missile.
The range is not long enough to fight China, because it's supposed to be launched from second island chain, where American navy is possibly safe, possibly.
China would do more damage if we the USA got close to China.Early in a war at least.If the USA goes to war with China tho there will be no winner.Missile range tho is so important to current and future warfare
Well. You seem to forget that they will also be used from F35s from aircraft carriers, It is also made to be launched from helicopters that are on other US Navy ships. Increasing the operational distance by a lot. So just considering the distance fired from a ship only, is a huge mistake you seem to make. If China is so stupid that they risk testing it, they will for sure regret it very quickly.
No the US is buying the NSM to be used by aircraft and on their smaller literall combat ships. The US Marines are also going to be using it if they are based on island anywhere in the Pacific to give some protection against enemy shipping. There are also longer range missiles like precision strike missile which will be fired from the HIMARS it's going to be faster than the ATACM missile which flies at over MACH 3 and they are looking at getting the range of the missile anywhere from 1000-1600km with a seeker on it so it can engage moving targets at sea.
Bro this missile is outstanding,stealthy without any doubt.but its not enough to punch china..It's only 180kilo range.meanwhile Chinese navy already has 180,300,540,800 and even 2000 kilo range Hypersonic anti ship missile that can easily create a large distance for us navy.
China claim a lot of things but I’m suspicious. The US have been working on them far longer and spending far more but China have made them better and quicker? I’m not so sure. China have a habit of bluffing and exaggerating the effectiveness of their platforms.
@@snsproduc you have ballistic missiles not anti ship ballistic missile..they have "hypersonic" anti ship ballistic missile.. Meanwhile you are struggling to complete test of a hypersonic missile let alone having them..They have hypersonic glide vehicle.According to one of you general Us is not ready to them...😅
@@TheLittleMaestro2911 I’m not American. Of course the Generals are worried. That’s what they do. It also gets them more money if people are scared of China. I’m not saying people shouldn’t be concerned either, just that they should take most of what China says with a pinch of salt. Look how well the Russian super weapons have done in the Ukraine
@@RR-us2kp Sorry. After 30 years studying President George Washington's Farewell Address in relation to "...the baneful effects of political parties generally." I cant help use the line "But it has electrolytes" taken from the movie Idiocracy whenever I see misguided Americans parade war.
Speed reduces reaction time to a matter of maybe 5 seconds or even less. Mach 3 is a speed of about 3000 feet a second, Mach 5 or "hypersonic" is about 6000 feet a second. No good knowing or not knowing if the missile is there and approaching, but if you do not have the time and ability to shoot it down. It is ALL about missiles and drones now and speed and range are the trump cards of both sides of the contest. Ships, planes and tanks etc are just trucks to get the right weapons to the right place at the right time.
why would it be nightmare for china, china now testing their own hypersonic missile, where us sm6 block 1b failed terribly to intercept a hypersonic even now
Hypersonic weapons are not everything. They're more like a gimmick. The US thinks they're bullshit that's why a long time ago they went the other way when it came to missiles (slower and maneuverable/ hard to detect is better than speed) and the reason why they did that. I think, is they know that all missiles defense system are way way over hyped and will not get all of them or even 60 percent of them. Hypersonic weapons are expensive ( F-35). So what would you like 45 of these missiles or one hypersonic missile. Which one will do more damage. Also all ballistic missile are hypersonic, so the US missile defensive that are designed to shot down ballistic missile will still work (hitting them right before re-entry).
The Ukrainian sunk a large russian warship with two subsonic missiles that arn't even designed for stealth. This missile is designed for stealth that's why it will be a concern for China. The US has successfully intercepted a ballistic missile with the SM6
Sorry to say but see what the "Hypersonic" weapons do in Ukraine or have done, very little to change outcome of the war. And more important is that ... do we trust China or Russia to truly have a working hypersonic weapon ? or is it just .... propaganda of some sort, we know they have been doing this shit before.
DC is defended by NASAMS, also a system bu Kongsberg. On the other hand: we are 10 years behind the Russians because we never checked of our systems were up to date.
US ships were once shot in the middle east by Chinese anti ship missiles. None actually got close. Not because they were shot down. They were just behaving like proper Chinese products
Military TV: Why does the US Navy hate Littoral Combat ships? Also Military TV: Show video of US Navy Launching Navy's Smart Naval Strike Missile... From a Littoral Combat ship... Sorry did I miss a video? To date I've watched all your videos, some even more than once with the exception of 2 or 3 that I just wasn't going to watching because of the title. Please do better.
Both LCS classes were poorly planned out and poorly designed (went from a concept to construction in 6 months) their crews are too small for all of the roles they fill, the vessels are too large for the small crews, and the Rank and File who actually work on the Ships actually call them Little Crappy Ships (LCS)
@@Scorpio.1989 This. It doesn't help that the Independence Class ships' hulls are cracking and the Freedom Class ships' combining gear (giving them their 45-knot speed) breaks, resulting in a disabled ship.
The speed isn't really relevant here. It's a sneaky missile. But you should be happy to know that Kongsberg/Norway with Germany has started designing a new longer range missile, the Super Sonic Strike Missile (3SM Tyrfing).
@@rowaystarco If so, then why bother producing a faster missile. Speed is all about having less time to find, target and kill the incoming threat. At 1000 metres a second the target defence has seconds to kill it. Most ASMs are supersonic now except for that old dynosour, the Harpoon.
@@ozjohn39 Because they will supplement eachother. Speed is fine, but NSM uses different tech. Stealth, skimming the surface and actively moving to avoid targeting while nearing the target. The NSM is a smart missile.
There is no evidence to show China can hit a moving target with this missile. Also it has never sunk a single ship, even in tests. So the idea it can kill a 5000 water tight compartment aircraft carrier is nothing more than fake news from China. If you can provide any evidence to show they can hit a moving ship with this missile. Or any evidence showing it can disable a 300+ meter long ship. Then I would be very interested in seeing it.... But I have a feeling you won't be able too... Just remember, China said it had no virus. China said they contained the virus in Wuhan..... We all know that was a lie because the global had to go into lock down because of China's lies 😉
Speed isn’t every thing, in order to faster they have to be larger and fly higher both of which add to their radar signature making it easier to detect and intercept…
Yes they will be afraid if Taiwan has these when the Chinese try to cross the Taiwan strait with all their troop transports loaded up with men and equipment
@@easonhuang7117 Taiwan has known for decades they will face a huge bombardment before any seaborne landing they have plenty of bunkers built to hide vital equipment and they will have other equipment well camouflaged. The Taiwanese air force won't play any major role most of them won't get off the ground but the Taiwanese anti ship missiles arn't air launched. Go back through history it's littered with examples of huge bombardments not destroying the defences. The bombardment doesn't' work and China tries to cross the Taiwan strait they're going to be in a world of hurt they certainly won't be laughing.
Cool system for fleet v fleet combat, but good luck blowing up 10,000 small boats going 50kph across the straight filled with 20 China men each, not to mention the tens of thousands that will be parachuting all over the island causing havoc. Meh whatever, might as well sell as much of this crap to Taiwan before they're no longer a customer I guess is what they're thinking.
You are clearly 100% clueless about how real war works. You talk like a 12 year old playing to many computer games. Those 10.000 small boats of you have a fantasy about, would be shot to pieces long time before they reach any beach and not a single missile will be used to do it. And the tens of thousands of paratroopers will not even get close to jump off their planes over land. The Chinese are not so stupid that they will try any of your "smart" tactics.
The Chinese will be engaged on their own shoreline any amphibious landing will have to mass on Chinese side and will be seen well in advance of any attack. Small boats will only be able to carry men with small arms they won't have any heavy weapons. As for the airborne forces they will show up on radar long before they get to Taiwan and the majority of the transports will be shot down.
It’s time to test them in the Black Sea on Russian ships.
Already tested. A very efficient bird. Just like Harpoon.
Damn skippy
@@aleksandrprodeus9383 far better than Harpoon
Ukrainian war couldn’t of come at a better time for the west tbh (economic decline after COVID and americas move to secure the European energy market, who gained from blowing up nordstream, who even has the capability to conduct secret underwater ops hint a certain Seawolf Class Sub) Kick Russias ass via a proxy, get to test out how they’d perform against Russia with their equipment. The most important of all it’s all free advertisement for the defence industry. (By defence industry I do mean Lockheed, BAE and Baryaktar).
Oh yes.
Raytheon and Kongsberg should consider jointly develop a submarine launch variant of Naval Strike Missile (NSM).
i do believe that they are doing that aswell.
We planned for it with our new CD212 submarines being built in Germany, they skipped and reintroduced a second time. Norway is very secretive on the issue.
I'm really confused. This looks like a fanboy site from the outside, but actually has content that is both rational and of reasonable substance. Nice job.
Please review the coastal missile system with the Harpoon missile - HCDS (Harpoon Coastal Defense System)
Damn Norway,
You scary!
Small military budgets man. They use brains more than us
Just finding new ways to plunder goods like the old viking days.
Taiwan should be buying the truck mounted NSM it has enough range to reach the Chinese coastline
Too slow and too short range. Taiwans missiles are FAR better!
@@ozjohn39 they not too short range to defend the Taiwan strait which is narrow.
They also not to slow to target the assault ships carrying all the Chinese marines and their equipment.
@@Stephen-bq4nq
Taiwan's Brave Wind.3. is Mach.3+. and 400 kms range, it has to be to counter a PLAN invasion OR blockade.
@@ozjohn39 Taiwan has their own designs of subsonic and supersonic missiles and you don't need missiles to be supersonic to engage the assault ships crossing the Taiwan strait.
The strait is 180Km wide at it's widest point the standard Navel strike missile can go 200 Km another version can go 250Km.
It has more than enough range to be effective and has stealth built into its design and also does evasive manoeuvres as it closes with the target.
@@ozjohn39 Does not need mach 3 when they are stealth and in general harder to shoot down.
With love from Norway
Forgot map recognition.... and super seaskim feature..
After egypt sank the destroyer the world stoped building destroyers and focus shifted to smaller ships like corvettes and frigates…
not really. A weapon would only disappear when a better replacement is available.
@@haohuajiang526 Corvette and frigate just only for navy like Russia
@@redblueyankee8343 i don't get your point dude.
@@haohuajiang526 I mean only large navy but junk like Russia need that type of ships
Blurry line between frigate and destroyers. Especially with European frigates
Is this missile the replacement for the Harpoon?
I think the jasm is the replacement of the harpoon
The harpoon is slowly being taken out of service according to the British but I don’t know what the replacement is.
News actually broke in July, that UK is in negotiations to buy NSM.
Yes and no. A newer Harpoon type is being developed but the NSM is for lighter missions. The difference between the two warheads is that the Harpoon has a warhead twice the weight of the NSM.
Okay, can this missile be fired from the Mk41 VLS?
"The Navy"? Earth has one navy?
Yes. Earth navy and the enemy communist navy
@@RR-us2kp Which planet is the communist navy from and how did they get here?
@@BenVaserlan don't know. Just know that they're here and they're hellbent on invading every other nation on the planet.
Stop war in the world
Why nation's are purchasing the NSM rather than the larger and longer ranged LRASM on ships and land? is it weight?
Don't you just love NATO Nations weapons systems
Is this an AI written article. The language is kind of odd and the logic a bit rough.
Best navy in the world, keep it up USA.
Now Ukraine have the NSAM
Nasams yes. Same builder different and older system compared to this. As nasams are defence and nsm is attack.
@@aztex6981 NASAMS is a Surface to air missile system not a anti ship missile.
perfect
at the end its a numbers game.overwhelming with highend gear is less likley due to coasts and potential targeting their depots.
Good morning, I subscribed to your channel and thanks for the very interesting videos
I have created a belief that in general it is much easier to attack than to protect oneself
Any protection system will always have limited potential, weak points that these latest generation missiles will always be able to hit
This consideration inevitably leads to a situation called ESCALATION
And when a country that possesses nuclear weapons like Russia feels backed into a corner, in my opinion, it will start using tactical nuclear weapons.
What happens next is hard to imagine
"It is the only 5th generation long range precision strike missile in the world"? What about Sea breaker and Blue Spear/Gabriel 5 anti ship missile?
blue spear aint even close and sea breaker isent even in service asfar as i can tell while the nsm is very much developed finished and in service
@@powerkingez9682 Israel Aerospace Industries is reportedly working on a Gabriel V Advanced Naval Attack Missile, with an advanced active multi-spectral seeker designed for cluttered littoral environments. As of 2020, this variant is deployed by the Finnish and Israeli navies. Range is claimed to be more than 200 km to 400 km.
Successful test firing of the Gabriel V was conducted by the Israel Defense Forces on September 21st 2022. Gabriel 5 is a 5th generation anti ship missile. Blue spear derived from Gabriel missile.
@@ParallelComparison It's not a 5th gen missle, and lacks the stealth capabilities.
@@daginn896 False. Where you got this garbage from?
@@daginn896 It lacks network centric and stealth, NSM and LRASM are very 5th gen missiles
DF17: what are talking about?
C-HGB, HAWC: what are you talking about?
And this is the cruise missile not about ballistic missile, are you dumb? Oh the Chinese have never smart, sorry
Small warhead, but I guess it can't be helped since its a small missile.
NSM is not currently in use by the Canadian Navy.
No but it's been chosen for the Canadian Surface Combatant program
Soon
That ship hit by missile was indian navy bromosh missile testing video
No, the 6:20 is the NSM. The Bromosh clip that you have seen uses the same clip and it's is fake promo for Bromosh. It is actually the NSM.
The range is not long enough to fight China, because it's supposed to be launched from second island chain, where American navy is possibly safe, possibly.
I agree.
China would do more damage if we the USA got close to China.Early in a war at least.If the USA goes to war with China tho there will be no winner.Missile range tho is so important to current and future warfare
Well.
You seem to forget that they will also be used from F35s from aircraft carriers,
It is also made to be launched from helicopters that are on other US Navy ships.
Increasing the operational distance by a lot.
So just considering the distance fired from a ship only, is a huge mistake you seem to make.
If China is so stupid that they risk testing it, they will for sure regret it very quickly.
No the US is buying the NSM to be used by aircraft and on their smaller literall combat ships.
The US Marines are also going to be using it if they are based on island anywhere in the Pacific to give some protection against enemy shipping.
There are also longer range missiles like precision strike missile which will be fired from the HIMARS it's going to be faster than the ATACM missile which flies at over MACH 3 and they are looking at getting the range of the missile anywhere from 1000-1600km with a seeker on it so it can engage moving targets at sea.
How is a missile with 120 mile range China's worst nightmare?
Talking out his ass its not
Bro this missile is outstanding,stealthy without any doubt.but its not enough to punch china..It's only 180kilo range.meanwhile Chinese navy already has 180,300,540,800 and even 2000 kilo range Hypersonic anti ship missile that can easily create a large distance for us navy.
China claim a lot of things but I’m suspicious. The US have been working on them far longer and spending far more but China have made them better and quicker? I’m not so sure. China have a habit of bluffing and exaggerating the effectiveness of their platforms.
That's a ballistic Missile. WE HAVE THEM TOO
@@snsproduc you have ballistic missiles not anti ship ballistic missile..they have "hypersonic" anti ship ballistic missile..
Meanwhile you are struggling to complete test of a hypersonic missile let alone having them..They have hypersonic glide vehicle.According to one of you general Us is not ready to them...😅
@@richtea7868 yepp,That's why your generals are sweating cz they are fluffing right??
@@TheLittleMaestro2911 I’m not American. Of course the Generals are worried. That’s what they do. It also gets them more money if people are scared of China. I’m not saying people shouldn’t be concerned either, just that they should take most of what China says with a pinch of salt. Look how well the Russian super weapons have done in the Ukraine
It's a stop gap measure, the navy said.
We need in until Larasm is out
But it has electrolytes...
Electrolytes?
@@RR-us2kp Sorry. After 30 years studying President George Washington's Farewell Address in relation to "...the baneful effects of political parties generally." I cant help use the line "But it has electrolytes" taken from the movie Idiocracy whenever I see misguided Americans parade war.
Speed is not the measurement of missile superiority,it is maneuverability ,the ability to evade enemy radar and accuracy.👿😈😝😝😛😛😛🥴🥴
Speed reduces reaction time to a matter of maybe 5 seconds or even less. Mach 3 is a speed of about 3000 feet a second, Mach 5 or "hypersonic" is about 6000 feet a second. No good knowing or not knowing if the missile is there and approaching, but if you do not have the time and ability to shoot it down.
It is ALL about missiles and drones now and speed and range are the trump cards of both sides of the contest. Ships, planes and tanks etc are just trucks to get the right weapons to the right place at the right time.
With your generic advices, do you honestly think the Chinese just going to simply drop their AK and run away.
No, but they are for sure to scared to attack any countries to achieve their goals.
No they will be swimming back to China
Oh yes
RakHine
why would it be nightmare for china, china now testing their own hypersonic missile, where us sm6 block 1b failed terribly to intercept a hypersonic even now
Hypersonic weapons are not everything. They're more like a gimmick. The US thinks they're bullshit that's why a long time ago they went the other way when it came to missiles (slower and maneuverable/ hard to detect is better than speed) and the reason why they did that. I think, is they know that all missiles defense system are way way over hyped and will not get all of them or even 60 percent of them. Hypersonic weapons are expensive ( F-35). So what would you like 45 of these missiles or one hypersonic missile. Which one will do more damage. Also all ballistic missile are hypersonic, so the US missile defensive that are designed to shot down ballistic missile will still work (hitting them right before re-entry).
Source trust me bro 🙂
The Ukrainian sunk a large russian warship with two subsonic missiles that arn't even designed for stealth.
This missile is designed for stealth that's why it will be a concern for China.
The US has successfully intercepted a ballistic missile with the SM6
Sorry to say but see what the "Hypersonic" weapons do in Ukraine or have done, very little to change outcome of the war. And more important is that ... do we trust China or Russia to truly have a working hypersonic weapon ? or is it just .... propaganda of some sort, we know they have been doing this shit before.
Any record of hypersonic weapons successfully used in naval warfare?
As a result of the spelling of the APU "MARS" in Belgorod, a family of Ukrainian refugees from Kharkov was killed. Freaks.
Dream on Norwegian .🎉🎉
LOL LOL LOL
DC is defended by NASAMS, also a system bu Kongsberg. On the other hand: we are 10 years behind the Russians because we never checked of our systems were up to date.
10 years behind what? their navy, army or airforce? none are doing a great work lately
Make a amour belt of 2 inches and the 125 kg warhead will do little damage.
The missile would just choose the bridge of the ship if the hull armour were thick
Then it's a battleship. Do you know what happened to battleships?
No.. The YJ18 is the US worst nightmare
No.. The LRASM is the China worst nightmare
US ships were once shot in the middle east by Chinese anti ship missiles. None actually got close. Not because they were shot down. They were just behaving like proper Chinese products
Military TV: Why does the US Navy hate Littoral Combat ships?
Also Military TV: Show video of US Navy Launching Navy's Smart Naval Strike Missile... From a Littoral Combat ship...
Sorry did I miss a video? To date I've watched all your videos, some even more than once with the exception of 2 or 3 that I just wasn't going to watching because of the title. Please do better.
Both LCS classes were poorly planned out and poorly designed (went from a concept to construction in 6 months) their crews are too small for all of the roles they fill, the vessels are too large for the small crews, and the Rank and File who actually work on the Ships actually call them Little Crappy Ships (LCS)
@@Scorpio.1989 This. It doesn't help that the Independence Class ships' hulls are cracking and the Freedom Class ships' combining gear (giving them their 45-knot speed) breaks, resulting in a disabled ship.
China more missiles per ship,plus more ships
they have more fishing boats that they call are battleships or floating casinos but we have way more ships that are designed for battle.
Made in china.....thats a problem within itself
Too SLOW, and too short ranged.
The speed isn't really relevant here. It's a sneaky missile. But you should be happy to know that Kongsberg/Norway with Germany has started designing a new longer range missile, the Super Sonic Strike Missile (3SM Tyrfing).
@@rowaystarco
If so, then why bother producing a faster missile.
Speed is all about having less time to find, target and kill the incoming threat. At 1000 metres a second the target defence has seconds to kill it.
Most ASMs are supersonic now except for that old dynosour, the Harpoon.
@@ozjohn39 Because they will supplement eachother.
Speed is fine, but NSM uses different tech. Stealth, skimming the surface and actively moving to avoid targeting while nearing the target. The NSM is a smart missile.
The propaganda of their weapons are amazing all b*******
What propaganda?
If you talk about this weapon, you are clearly 100% clueless as I can promise you that it does what is said in this video and more.
Like the Chinese and Russians
And China's DF- 21D Carrier Killer is USN worst nightmare.
if it works
There is no evidence to show China can hit a moving target with this missile.
Also it has never sunk a single ship, even in tests.
So the idea it can kill a 5000 water tight compartment aircraft carrier is nothing more than fake news from China.
If you can provide any evidence to show they can hit a moving ship with this missile. Or any evidence showing it can disable a 300+ meter long ship.
Then I would be very interested in seeing it.... But I have a feeling you won't be able too...
Just remember, China said it had no virus.
China said they contained the virus in Wuhan.....
We all know that was a lie because the global had to go into lock down because of China's lies 😉
DF-21 is a ballistic missile. Those can be shot down.
Ppftt…. China Missiles are faster and has much longer range…. As if PLAN is afraid of it lol
"Regize Element" barking is the US worst nightmare 🙂👌
Speed isn’t every thing, in order to faster they have to be larger and fly higher both of which add to their radar signature making it easier to detect and intercept…
Yes they will be afraid if Taiwan has these when the Chinese try to cross the Taiwan strait with all their troop transports loaded up with men and equipment
@@Stephen-bq4nq 🤣🤣Yeah, China will totally sending troops across the strait without bombing Taiwan's missile sites and airport first.
@@easonhuang7117 Taiwan has known for decades they will face a huge bombardment before any seaborne landing they have plenty of bunkers built to hide vital equipment and they will have other equipment well camouflaged.
The Taiwanese air force won't play any major role most of them won't get off the ground but the Taiwanese anti ship missiles arn't air launched.
Go back through history it's littered with examples of huge bombardments not destroying the defences.
The bombardment doesn't' work and China tries to cross the Taiwan strait they're going to be in a world of hurt they certainly won't be laughing.
Cool system for fleet v fleet combat, but good luck blowing up 10,000 small boats going 50kph across the straight filled with 20 China men each, not to mention the tens of thousands that will be parachuting all over the island causing havoc.
Meh whatever, might as well sell as much of this crap to Taiwan before they're no longer a customer I guess is what they're thinking.
That's what cluster munitions are for
Time to give Taiwan nuclear subs and station US nuclear devices in Taiwan.
You are clearly 100% clueless about how real war works.
You talk like a 12 year old playing to many computer games.
Those 10.000 small boats of you have a fantasy about, would be shot to pieces long time before they reach any beach and not a single missile will be used to do it.
And the tens of thousands of paratroopers will not even get close to jump off their planes over land.
The Chinese are not so stupid that they will try any of your "smart" tactics.
The Chinese will be engaged on their own shoreline any amphibious landing will have to mass on Chinese side and will be seen well in advance of any attack.
Small boats will only be able to carry men with small arms they won't have any heavy weapons.
As for the airborne forces they will show up on radar long before they get to Taiwan and the majority of the transports will be shot down.
American propoganda
LOL.
You better hope so 😉
So why you watch this 🙂