Technical Tuesday: RMRcc? Why not?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @N.S.56
    @N.S.56 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My Ed Brown has a slide cut for the RMRCC.

  • @meee175
    @meee175 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I couldn't believe the price of the RMRcc when it released. Almost $800 at my local shop. It's ridiculously tiny.

  • @jonguitarman2003
    @jonguitarman2003 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    How bout making a RMRcc cut slide like you have for the Acro? Just a thought. Probably not enough demand. I love my Holosun optics myself so I don’t have any issues!

  • @kensnyder2340
    @kensnyder2340 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    There are plenty of choices as you said. Why get hung up on one optic. Your system works great for me. I have the conventional RMR.

  • @-_bigtap
    @-_bigtap ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You were right with the EPS carry

  • @pledgegamer
    @pledgegamer ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Both the Holosun eps and eps carry use the shield arms screw holes.

    • @ice2dance
      @ice2dance ปีที่แล้ว

      Just purchased the CR920 elite. I am considering the holosun eps carry multiple reticle.
      So what your saying is it will fit?

  • @typicaledc
    @typicaledc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Luckily there's tons of other manufactures that support the RMRcc. I'll continue to buy from them as I want my off-duty pistol to have the most rugged red dot on it.

  • @codykoon5520
    @codykoon5520 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Trevor, why don’t you just make a special slide that only accepts the RMRcc? You could charge $9,000 for just the slide so you could almost make money on the limited run lol

  • @ph00ny1
    @ph00ny1 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    RMRcc was Trijicon showing their ego/arrogance. Now they're sold with discounts with plates included

  • @pewtin
    @pewtin ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gideon optics Judge fits shield rmsc

  • @heent7972
    @heent7972 ปีที่แล้ว

    Writing my Congresscritter now!

  • @JCThr3
    @JCThr3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you guys planning on selling the Elite slides?

  • @mikeburklin2675
    @mikeburklin2675 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That is just Ego getting in the way of business, if they were savvy they would have used the K/sheild mounting and tried to grab the business off of their name and reputation, but as you can see it has been a failure. Shadow Systems keep up the good work and as always listen to your customers. ❤

  • @5280fame
    @5280fame ปีที่แล้ว

    Love it thanks for the info glad to see you back

  • @garywinkel1831
    @garywinkel1831 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    To me, that's a swing and a miss on Trijicon's part.

  • @jamesdelong6401
    @jamesdelong6401 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great. Technical Tuesday

  • @Cuba537
    @Cuba537 ปีที่แล้ว

    CR920X 15 rounds any time soon ?

  • @bunghuls
    @bunghuls ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It’s still better than a 507K though. My buddy’s 507K as bright as it can go still got kind of washed out on a very bright day at the range last month. My rmrcc was way brighter and did not get washed out.
    Also, please consider making a RMRcc slide sold separately. Until then I’ll stick with my 43x 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @jameshowlett4314
    @jameshowlett4314 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love the guns, not a fan of the customer service. I call, the phone just rings. I leave a message and do not receive a call back. I email, never to receive a response.
    Here's our gun: good luck.

  • @hccif
    @hccif ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you send me a Shadow Systems patch for the patch wall?

  • @justinv4036
    @justinv4036 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow. I had no idea they did this shit.
    I have an rmr, but will never buy a CC or any other trig product until this is corrected.
    When a company does this with intentional exclusive or unnecessarily proprietary designs, they are trying to leverage their customer loyalty to shut out competitors.
    Totally a BS way to do it as it ultimately just hurts consumers and the industry.
    If you want to keep your customers, win them based on the virtues of your products, innovation, and customer service; dont try to lock them into some proprietary box like an insecure and jealous boyfriend....

  • @dennisl4000
    @dennisl4000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It sounds like Trijicon excluded themselves from the market with this optic. They need to swallow their pride and introduce an optic that does fit a "common" footprint.