Attachment of Earnings & Charging Orders | Cease And Desist Caution Notice
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 มี.ค. 2024
- Get our FREE Peace Keepers and Court Auditor courses here at peacekeepers.org.uk/
FREE Council Tax dispute challenge download here noc.peacekeepers.org.uk/
"Peace Keepers have been created to help secure a just and equitable existence., coming together to defend the peoples peace, to restore and preserve our inalienable rights, the highest standing in truth to be sovereign."
Nothing can be done to the prejudice of the people.
(Bill of Rights 1688)
Law is the people’s birth right.
(Act of Settlement 1700)
All are equal under the law.
No one is above the law.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
No one can knowingly impose their will upon any other without freewill.
Everybody has lawful excuse to the right of self-defence.
---------------------------------
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976
Allowance is made for "fair use" purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Download Notice - peacekeepers.org.uk/wp-conten...
Parliament is not Sovereign the subjects are sovereign fact…
Guy Fawkes what a top bloke!
Just sending Glasgow city council court proceedings
What court will that be.
I also would like to know as I am almost ready
Scott and co bailiffs first as they never had a court order then the council because the first case will provide the proof
My local Council Instructed the DWP to put an attachment to my benefits without any court order for non-payment of council tax.
I have sent them both a cease and desist Order which they have both ignored .
oh i like the sound of the judge you been dealing with...he sounds reasonable, and doing his job....
22:20 “You might have been able to make it up thus far…”
There’s the Convention element that appears to have set precedent in these matters.
However, we need to ask WHY would parliament make law with such obvious deficiencies? A huge amount of its income is derived from council tax. So why would they fail to make good law for its collection???
Great video. very timely.
They are gonna get such a wake up call...
Love you guys.
A stern letter to land registry as a shot across the bow is needed...and the high court beckons.
Their ignorance of the law is no excuse! Boom... 💥
Letter to land registry what would this letter comprise of please
@@cosmic2me2004 make them aware I am on to them taking instructions based on non valid proof....I have a charging order on my house, falsely and fraudulently attached...Ignorance of the law is no excuse....: )
@@cosmic2me2004 letting them know your not a proprietor is a start.
So what happened to, 'no man is above the law' and therefore no one can obligate you to pay something you don't wish to trade with. Why is this not enough?
unfortunately corruption mate
You were lucky to find one judge, prepared to listen to your argument.
In reality most aren't and things will proceed as they have done.
Sadly, many individuals will find themselves in debt and in trouble, when they believe they can contest this and find they can't.
Its in legislation Sec 13 of the Employments right act 1996 they have to prove statutory obligation ( Proof of liability or Charging order)
Lovely to see the digging through the parliamentary and local authority rules and regulations but none of it is law.
Rundl_s are now on the back foot after asking them to shown the Liability order ,apparently its in the post !🤣😂
Well done guys!!
I am sending the letter to my council following the process .. the more i hear from these two great blokes , just gives me to will and want to go for it ..
It's not a contract, it's a statutory demand@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629
And a written order would mean they have to change 'it is not to be treated as a sum adjudged' wouldn't it?
@24:50 "The courts have made themselves subservient to Parliament..." This is exactly what Sir Jack Beatson confirmed in 2008 when he stated "The 2003 changes and the new responsibilities given to the Lord Chief Justice necessitated a certain amount of re-examination of the relationship between the judiciary and the two STRONGER branches of the state --- the executive and the legislature." i.e. it's subservient.
So only a county court or higher can place a charging order on property..not a magistrates court 🤔 yes ?..
Correct
@@marchorn466 thanks had this out with a council court 'officer" clueless 😆
A true magistrates court order can certainly place a charging order on property but not the fake liability orders our beloved councils rely on! 😂
Thank you
Evening Marc great work as always
Love you guys
You guys are great jim
Made my Day..!!
Define "made" 😜
Do you have different stages of the paper work. We can give them. When they start there bullying ?
Cheers and God bless.
We need back to the Real School of learning about our Sovereign Rights 😢🎉🎉❤
Where’s the evidence, I got told it exists 😂 W Thanks Guys ❤
Am sorry the way you have been describing liability orders & attachments was very hard to follow, it would be best to do a further video clearing it up as this video is pretty much all over the place & most people who dont normally read legislation etc will struggle too follow it properly
My Mrs was having attachments of earnings for council tax she got it all cleared after they took one lot and left her nothing to live on because they didn't do a mean-test of earnings
Wow , interesting...will hey not simply change the legislation/law to encompass what you have identified then rework the wording ?
Also I wonder what recourse those have, that were caused detriment ( property or houses changed then seized ) against the council or enforcement agents ???
What's people's thoughts on the Gary Waterman chap?
I haven't been through all of his videos yet, so I'm still trying to understand the evidence he has - it would be useful if there was a summary of the most damning/indisputable evidence he's found of the corruption.
Who is Gary Waterman?
@@JaxSwim1 youtube.com/@Garytruthsetsusfree
@@JaxSwim1 his TH-cam channel is @Garytruthsetsusfree
@@JaxSwim1Garytruthsetsusfree
I’ve been at a loss this last fortnight . Glad your both back and on true form . Marc can I ask the word document is that intended to be used by the needy obviously with name change etc:. Also awhile back you and Brian were talking about a PDF file you were posting as a guild for any court case , is this completed yet and where can I download please.
First draft is on website - going through editing.
@@marchorn466
In what jurisdiction is the bundle for the court proceedings
I have a liability order produced 33 hours before hearing with 3 J.P.s names on it
I was suspended from work for the council for inappropriate conduct
The council lied about everything and brought in withholding C.T. to punish me even more
They put Attachment of earnings on
I have not been in work for a year but I have not handed in my notice either so I am still employed by them
I want to claim constructive dismissal on the grounds that I cannot work with criminals
Then I could go through employment tribunal.. but I don't know if they will have the jurisdiction to hear about the lies of the suspension and the crimes of the C.T.
there is also an issue whereby they protected a criminal to fabricate the suspension lie
So there are 3 major issues all as important as each other and all related through me
What court does this belong in and how do I get there
Respectfully and gratefully yours David
Sellassie I
Make something up
Please cease and desist calling legislation the law. It is not law, it is legal. They are very different things.
Even people’s benefits they can’t take its not int he legislation on attachment of earnings it’s another piece of legislation. They can’t take money from anyone’s benefits either uc pip etc
I'm ready for the court's
8 don't know whether to go through the employment tribunal
If 8 knew how i would g9 direct t9 the high court
My case is massive
And I am reaching out for assistance
Completely seperate issue but has anyone dealt with an attachment of earnings for unpaid vehicle tax?
enforcement of that will be under the Attachment of Earnings Act unless DVLA has a similar direct enforcement power as with CT which is highly probable as it is all unlawful!!! The courts must start to uphold their constitutional duty to uphold the rule of law and separation of powers as opposed to being puppets og Government!!!
@@marchorn466 the attachment of earnings is set to come out of my wages Thursday and I’m not sure as to what exactly I need to be looking at on the aoe act
I imagine that'll because court fine for no vehicle licence as opposed to for vehicle licence....very different.
The Royal prerogative was removed by A act of parliament
Please provide which act led you to this belief please as enactment requires royal prerogative!
@@marchorn466 you said it by your own words on video parliament acting like the king
@@marchorn466 The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 removed the monarch's prerogative power to dissolve parliament
@@marchorn466 The Prize Act 1948 abolished the Crown prerogative of granting prize money or any money arising from Droits of the Crown in wartime
@@keithshippey230 That does not remove royal prerogative. It cannot as the right to govern stems from the common law (Case of proclamations 1610 reaffirmed in 2019 by unanimous 11 justice majority in UKSC 41 (prorogation judgment).
The fixed term Parliament Act 2011 fixes the timing of elections to a maximum of 5 years to stop manipulating elections for advantage.
To dissolve parliament is a customary royal prerogative which is done on the advice of HM Government by its prime minister.
Only children and slaves ask for permission and are bound by all man made statutes and acts. The Sovereign man and woman makes their own law. They decide their jurisdiction, their rules and on their terms. The word legal means the undoing of Gods law. No man can rule or dictate how someone is to live. You cannot be given rights nor can you ask for their protection. To ask for your rights is to accept that you are a citizen (slave to the city) the lowest in society.
So are you saying the Council can’t MAKE a liability order? But can’t prove it? Do liability orders still have to be authorised by the Court?
Only a court can make a liability order = the judicial function is to apply the mind to whether or not to grant it... It is the granting of the wish (the order that is wanted). This is manifested either in words or writing. If spoken only those who witnessed it can testify as to its existance, and hence the written intrument confirmed by the creator provides a permanent record of its existence...
@@marchorn466 must have case number, and the small matter of civil procedure rules, and you must be able to obtain the court extract.
@@spud7823 We no longer need to chase for it... Those trying to enforce must provide it!
@@marchorn466 👍correct, Marston could not provide a magistrates Court liability order, or deed of assignments, I give them three opportunities, all I had was obfuscation, so I have served a irrevocable estoppel, and cease and desist notice, with hefty fees if they come back, not seen them for months.
@@spud7823 Serving 'irrevocable estoppel may not stop enforcement :( but should they continue after 3 letters then you can sue them... Leighton precedent
Who gives a shyt about “orders”? The focus is on the totally wrong point. PROVE ANYONE OWES MONEY GOODNIGHT
as per, great research and info but submitting more paper that they will ignore is pointless. keep educating people -yes! 100%
get the people onto the streets to put this info into action ...?? lets see the day. sending them letter upon letter is pointless.
COURT IS WHERE THE CONTRACT IS MADE ! (invitation to a place of Business?) If there were a Bonified agreement you would NOT be invited, it would be demanded or ordered of you as you would have previously agreed to said agreement. LICAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT is rhe Only piee of Legislation that dors NOT Require the consent of the (agreed) governed
A court can be for many reasons... A court of law is where dispute is resolved arising from any agreement or believed right - nothing to do with contract!
@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 😂 you hit the nail the head! No matter what you say to some people there will always be those WAY behind lacking knowledge.
@@marchorn466 That is the Dumbest statement I've heard in light of all the ebidence and in all that's going on today. CHECK SECURITY EXCHANGE AND THEN TELL YOURSELF ITS NOT A CORPORATION! Dude ever heard of the word 'Duped"?
I need some help. can you speak for me in a confrence call please? yes no
You can ask in here t.me/noncnoc
And or here t.me/+dYtCEN_127o0MDY8
Regulation 45 CTAE is not the equivalent to paragraph 26 of Schedule 12 TCEA, this is bad logic. Case law expressly distinguishes the two provisions and what their purposes are.
Principle of law is judges reasoning which is the precedent... the principle of law applies to all similar situations...
I never said anything about the ratio decidendi of my case or the merits of the case you're claiming to be in the High Court. I said it is bad logic to say that Reg 45 CTAE is the equivalent of paragraph 26 of Schedule 12
When looking up words you unfortunately need too give two examples from ordinary dictionary & Blacks Law then show why Blacks if necessary isnt the correct interpretation of said word
It is basic statutory construction the normal meaning of words is what the words mean. Plenty other videos on this...
Black's law dictionary isn't an authority in UK courts
1:17; "the judge was suprised that there is no case law on what a liability order actually is". And for the next 20 minutes you go on, in some depth, about liability orders. Next, you want to redefine the English language with the nonsense about the meaning of the term 'make'. Eventually, you come to the idea that the term 'make' must mean to create a physical document. Really? How about 'make your way over there' or 'make up your mind' or make maximimum speed' etc? A physical document to have someone make up their mind?
Now for the Attachment of Earnings Order. You demonstrate your reading skills.
Charging orders receives the same addled logic.
And now we get to your exciting day out at court and quote the barrister responding to the judge's question "how did you verify the alleged debt for the charging order with "because the council said so". This caused some guffawing. Why? Read the Justices' Clerks paper on this, issued 2011 and revised 2023. But you have done that already, hence your PDF uploaded in 2023. You both sound quite certain that "it has got to be a written order". The rules say the order is created when the council submits a list to the court. And that is all. If you, the tax dodger, wants to challenge that, the opportunity arises before the council submit their list to the court. If you challenge it, you are entitled to your day in court. If you don't, then you have accepted it and that is that.
"The courts have made themselves subservient to parliament.." How about this view on that; Parliament creates and brings into force the laws then tell the courts "There you are, now enforce that". Believe it or not, that is known as democracy. The people put the parliament in place to create or modify the laws on their behalf. The people have no say in the behaviour of the courts and neither does parliament.
Just pay your tax. I don't like it but I accept I have to pay lawful taxes.