ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2015
- Most Wanted List - Runway Incursion Between Aer Lingus A330 and US Air B737
Boston Logan International Airport, Boston, Massachusetts
June 9, 2005
Presented at the Board meeting November 15, 2005 in Washington, D.C., for the Most Wanted List - 2005 Update on Federal Issues.
Disclaimer: This three dimensional animated reconstruction shows the runway incursion incident between an Aer Lingus A330 and a US Air B737 at the Boston Logan International Airport in Boston, Massachusetts on June 9, 2005. The following incident reconstruction displays information from the flight data recorder, recorded radar data, and aircraft performance data. This reconstruction does not depict weather or visibility conditions at the time of the incident.
The animation shows a three-dimensional representation of the airplanes and their motion. The local time of day (based on the FAA's Air Traffic Control radar data), the lateral separation in feet between the right wing tip of the Aer Lingus A330 and the nose of the US Air B737 and the vertical separation in feet between the landing gear of the Aer Lingus A330 and the center of gravity of the US Air B737 are depicted as text.
![[4K] BABYMONSTER(베이비몬스터) “FOREVER” Band LIVE Concert “영원히” 베몬만을 사랑하게 되…💗 [it’s KPOP LIVE 잇츠라이브]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TQfC0xdpiw4/mqdefault.jpg)
Do you want Tenerife, because that's how you get Tenerife.
Two planes involved on the runway, and the similarities stop here. The lessons to learn were very different. In Tenerife the single runway was not yet vacated when the pilot jumped the gun (took directional instructions for permission to start the takeoff roll). Here two controllers did not communicate and cleared two planes to take off from different but intersecting runways at the same time.
So, how is this "Most Wanted" relative to other incidents that may not have made the NTSB's "Most Wanted" list?
Potentially hundreds of people killed, by what almost comes down to one mistake by an ATC.
the "most wanted" means "the thing that we want to get rid of the most". and at that time it was RUNWAY INCURSIONS! this was massive issue in us airports in 90s-2010s which is why it was on the "most wanted" list compared to other safety issues that happen at a lower frequency, and therefore are not "most wanted"
At what point did the Air Lingus notice the incursion? How much of an early takeoff was this if at all?
It wasn't, but the other plane (B737) noticed the A330 rotating and then they delayed their own rotation until after the crossing. Fortunately there was just enough runway left to do this safely.
No problem...
use this process for Heathrow and Atlanta and every airplane will be in the air in less than 30 min
That would be impossible at Atlanta as the runways are all parallel.
thractrack At Heathrow as well.
Yeah but I don't want to be on either plane when they do it. I'd rather the delay :-)
Was this done on a DOS 5 system?
Dos 6 - Microsoft Paint and Turtle
State of the art graphics is not the point........... the point is to have highly accurate Flight data for the simulation.... anything else is a waste of resources.... basic ground clutter and or terrain detail is all you need
why are both runways being used when they cross? far out.
Some airports like BOS don't have unlimited amounts of land on which to build nice long parallel runways that are spaced miles apart.
controller error right here, though I wonder could RIMCAS stop this from happening
Definitely would make you crap your pants.....
Chicken!
Crossing runways. Alrighty then....
Yeah? Some airports like BOS don't have unlimited amounts of land on which to build nice long parallel runways that are spaced miles apart.
Aer Lingus have amazing pilots. As proven here.
They're magically delicious.
If they were amazing they'd have noticed the other aircraft started rolling. What amazes you about this little bit of self preservation?
😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳
Chicken ride!
There should be live camera feed in the cockpits or at least a stored feed...why are pilots exempt from scrutiny when police officers, train engineers etc have cameras watching their actions?
lmao at the idea that police officers undergo camera scrutiny. Whenever there's an incident, somehow the bodycams are always malfunctioning
That's more or less what black boxes are.
@@algonzales1809 you assume he even cares to hear fact, typical of the uninformed.
I am curious what more value a camera would provide? The recorders provide a huge amount of information and pilots are heavily reviewed after incidents so I don't see the value.
With NO Information included in the video OR description of any clearances that may have been issued this video has ZERO meaning. Come On, NTSB !
There was definitely enough information to tell you that was a sketchy friggin takeoff.
"Presented at the Board meeting" that's the point of the video not being a presentation
This kind of accident has happened before.... with major loss of life... if they were still both on the runway by the time of intersection, there would have been another case of major loss of life....
why can't this useless government upload in HD, it's 2015, I'm sure you guys spend countless hours making it look as factual as possible but when it can't be seen it's useless to us.
2005
For the same reason they still use "black boxes" in aircraft instead of transmitting the information to the airline. Money !!
celticlofts Transmitting a constant stream of data when you're hundreds of miles out over the ocean makes no sense. It's much easier to store all of the flight's data in a crash resistant container.
Airbus are already using data transmissions for their Airbus A380. Of course the USA and the Russians also used data transmissions for their respective space programs.
@@celticlofts Space operations are NOT commercial aviation operations.
There's ONE space station. There are tens of THOUSANDS of commercial planes in the air at any given time.