Runway Overrun and Collision, Southwest Airlines Flight 1248, Chicago Midway International Airport
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.พ. 2015
- Board Meeting Animation: Runway Overrun and Collision, Southwest Airlines Flight 1248, Boeing 737-7H4, N471WN, Chicago Midway International Airport, Chicago, Illinois, December 8, 2005
Presented on October 2, 2007
This three dimensional animated reconstruction shows the landing runway overrun accident at Midway Airport, Chicago, Illinois on December 8, 2005. The following accident reconstruction displays information from the flight data recorder, the cockpit voice recorder, and air traffic control communications. This reconstruction does not depict weather or visibility conditions at the time of the incident.
This animation contains no audio.
"Southwest Flight 1248, have you cleared the runway?"
"Uh, tower, define 'cleared'."
"Oh, you're on taxiway 'Main Street'? Buy a large coffe for me at the dunkin' doughnuts next door please."
i know im randomly asking but does any of you know of a trick to get back into an instagram account?
I stupidly forgot the account password. I would appreciate any assistance you can give me.
@Alvaro Kaison instablaster =)
@Aryan Terrance i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site on google and im waiting for the hacking stuff atm.
Looks like it's gonna take quite some time so I will reply here later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
They were distracted by the giant man on the port side at 0.11.
I think the giant man was the same guy Kirk saw on the wing of the airplane in that Twilight Zone episode
Still better than connecting through O'Hare.
On December 8, 2005, the airplane slid off a runway at Chicago-Midway while landing in a snowstorm.
WX went below minimums for the ILS 13C approach into MDW leaving them to do the 31C. This gave them a slight tail wind.
Touchdown, was down within the TDZ, BUT with only 4500' remaining - 5300' was required to stop when the numbers were calculated with the tailwind, weight and TR's taken into consideration. It is standard practice under FAR 25 that TR's NOT be used in tabulating landing distances.
The PF stated he was unable to get the TR's out of the stowed position (a personal note if you are pulling hard on the TR levers the locking pins may become wedged in the power lever quadrant making it impossible for them to deploy. As a matter of practice I used and taught pilots to select depoly remove your hands until you had "6 lights" [as was the case in my a/c] then apply reverse thrust) The PNF said he was able to deploy the TR's without issue.
The following is from the NTSB's findings. They are not my opinions -
Probable Cause
The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of
this accident was the pilots’ failure to use available reverse thrust in a timely manner
to safely slow or stop the airplane after landing, which resulted in a runway overrun.
This failure occurred because the pilots’ first experience and lack of familiarity with
the airplane’s autobrake system distracted them from thrust reverser usage during the
challenging landing.
Contributing to the accident were Southwest Airlines’ 1) failure to provide its
pilots with clear and consistent guidance and training regarding company policies and
procedures related to arrival landing distance calculations; 2) programming and design
of its on board performance computer, which did not present inherent assumptions in the
program critical to pilot decision-making; 3) plan to implement new autobrake procedures
without a familiarization period; and 4) failure to include a margin of safety in the arrival
assessment to account for operational uncertainties. Also contributing to the accident was
the pilots’ failure to divert to another airport given reports that included poor braking
actions and a tailwind component greater than 5 knots. Contributing to the severity of the
accident was the absence of an engineering materials arresting system, which was needed
because of the limited runway safety area beyond the departure end of runway 31C.
nerd
This is what (well one of the things) I like about aviation. If the company set-up their pilots to fail then they will be blamed for that failure, not just the pilots.
This is the only FDR I can find that it still recorded it
they were really late on thrust reversing
Im going to the same airport... im flying to texas and now im terrified
"what was that?" good question!
Late deployment of the TR’s that made all the difference. They must have just gotten distracted or something.
The crew was using autobrake system on this aircraft type for the very first time. They were so worried about messing up the autobrake, that they forgot about thrust reversers.
Thats bad because midway airport has a steel fence and the pilot could be seriously injured
Was someone in a car, adjacent to the fence, killed in this accident- or am I thinking of something else?
Yes a 6 year old boy died.
Sum Ting Wong!
Forgot reversers ?
no applied to late
*too
Microsoft Flight Simulator 98 be like:
Hit a car on a road and killed a passenger?
Robert Gift Pretty sure it was a child.
@@CBrolley it was a kid under age 10 I forget exact age but was def a child
@@peterf.229 8 y/o
ntsb thought he can track my adress
I was unaware that NTSB investigates Microsoft Flight Simulator crashes. Seems like a waste of government resources to me.
That was an actual crash; The 3D animation is based on actual data from the black box and is used in the investigation.
and that sound was the airplane, and then the joke, flying straight over your head
p4cks And that was my time being wasted by a 12 year old troll on the internet
Seriously? This is X-Plane, dumbass, and that is damn good use of my tax dollars!
Lol
Both pilot's had a pizza order in at Villa Rossa pizza on archer Avenue, and thought there was a drive thru.
Trebor Magmathon nothing funny about your comment.
Cause?
applied reversers too late, overran, hit car, killed boy.
also landed in snow storm
@@lucaspeng5063 In other words, incompetent pilots.
@@robertgiftye
Unpopular opinion: I don't think the pilots are to blame. An airliner should be able to land on the numbers like they did and stop using manual braking, without the use of reverse thrust. It looks like they needed reverse thrust here and that might not even have been enough. Just look at that slow deceleration with full manual braking.
Those pilots were screwed by whichever dispatcher let them use that runway with the factors at play. (weight, winds, runway length, contamination, etc)
This is the dumbest aviation-related opinion I've ever read. The dumbest.
@@Turbojets_Channel It must be the first one you've read as well. Planes fly with inoperative reverse thrust sometimes... it's just something that a pilot needs to compensate for with the wheel brakes. If reverse thrust was necessary to safely land on the runway in question, it was too short a runway.
@@alexphillips4663 I know they use reverse thrust at SAN airport on Southwest flights.
SW 1248 requesting sanitation pumping truck for the cabin areas please, there is shit everywhere.
Dave You Can't Leave This Empty
Sadly, a kid was killed in a car on Cicero avenue.
the boeing 737 crasher
Maybe some great aviators from ATA Airlines who ruled Midway winters with 737/800s and 757/200-300s could have prevented these events. But they were DEPLORABLES ..... BAD.......BAD.......BAD............THEY LIKED THEIR AUTOBRAKES go anywhere, anytime, anyplace correctly
I think the NTSB should hire some people from Disney Pictures...this animation sucks.!!
the point of the animations is to represent what happened, not realism.