How far have CPUs come in 9 years? First vs Newest 6-core CPU...
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2020
- I compare the world's first 6-core CPU to the Newest 6-core CPU to see how well processors age over 9 years.
Check out the video where Timmy Joe challenged me to a PC build off: • $250 PC builds are SUP...
For some Noob-Friendly, Dawid-approved T-shirts, and more, shop dawiddoesmerch.com/
-Here is a link to my Patreon page, it would be awesome if you check it out: / dawiddoestechstuff
Follow me on whichever Social media you don't hate
Discord: / discord
Twitch: / dawiddoestechstuff
TH-cam: / hardonhardware - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
980 is actually not a terrible experience almost 10 years later.
I just did CInebench R23 benchmark on my 2700k and got about 3200 MC score where as my 5600x got about 11750.
For games yeah but if you work on your computer in the day and game at night the 980 would probably feel terrible. Pretty sure the difference is big when it comes to compiling big projects.
Though GTX 980 isn't exactly "almost 10"? For example GTX 590 was launched less than 10 years prior your message.
@@kimnice he was talking about the Intel Core i7 - 980
@@bartolomichael Any overclock on that? I have the 2500k at 4Ghz and it's SLOW. Not for gaming, I don't do that, but even in TH-cam 4K, or Photoshop and similar. In games where the GPU matters most it might still work, but in other applications you see clearly it's old and outdated...
3:20 Okay, did your AIO just rick rolled me? 😂
Ah yes, ass odyssey. One of my all time favourite conquest games.
That was legitimately funny
to go boldly where no fucker has gone before
My favorite too!
Gap Gaping, such a poet ;)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Usually you pay double for that kind of action, Timmy Joe!
😏😏😏
Should have just said goatsieng at that point.
@@DawidDoesTechStuff do you purposefully say the names differently? No joke?
Did I just get Rick rolled by an aio cooler
You sure did, that guy gets everywhere lol.
Yeh so did I
Yes. Yes you did.
No this is Patrick
yes
3:14 he rickrolled us
Wheres My Phenom X6 XD
@@tobiwonkanogy2975 I'm never gonna give up my Phenom II.
Yeah, do a comparison with a Thuban vs Ryzen 5. I had one of those for 10 years. Lol
3:17 ... we see what you did there ...
Actually, I'm impressed the old CPU did so well. It was about half as fast. I was expecting 30 FPS to like 300 FPS. For 1080p 60 FPS gaming, old CPUs are still relevant.
would pci-e 2 allow a rtx 3080 run at full tilt?
@@raven4k998the cpu wouldn’t anyway
@@18rocksthegames78 meh that just goes to show how pathetic the cpu is not the pci-e on the bright side with the gpu not being pushed that hard it will last longer🤣
@@raven4k998if you're buying a 3080 then you're definitely not buying a 980. Still viable for ultra budget builds (kids first PC vibes)
Maybe fit a 710 or 970. Or an rx470
@@itzwildeyedyou could probably ram an 1080 inside and it would still be viable lol
Obvious loss aside, the fact that an old i7 from 2011 still held up amazingly well without much of a bottleneck in 2020 is a feat and a half! Futureproofing at its finest!
I mean it's a flagship processor... and games in 2020 were made taking into account the Jaguar processors from the PS4/XB1. I hope my Ryzen 3100 holds up at 60FPS for 9 years 😊
@@hugopereira5640 Games in 2013 were made with at least 6 cores in mind.
3100 will probably last to be honest. Make sure it's fed with decent ram and storage.
The bottleneck was the TDP and nearly half of the performance. In the end your paying for it in electricity and low FPS.
@@skorpersYou are lucky if you find games that utilize more than 4 cores/threads at all.
@@Rocky712_ Considering the Xbox 360 had 6 threads, I highly doubt that. The Xbox one had to free up 1 of its cores due to only using 6 at launch. They needed more CPU desperately all throughout launch and games definitely used it. Even CSGO from 2012 could handle 6 threads. TF2 is considered a particularly bad example of games not utilizing CPU but even it has 6 threads, albeit not with an assigned core.
Also more than certain battlefield 1, or maybe even battlefield 4 before it was when 6 core / 12 threads were shown to be more than needed.
I remember back in the late 1990s and early 2000s you'd get that same kind of performance jump in 18 months or less.
it's good now for people who want to hold on to their systems longer, and good for people who want to save a bit and get a system that's a few years old. Only people who get brand new cutting edge will end up paying the price, since they could have gotten like 97% for a lot less if they went with a slightly older CPU.
The times when single core was standard and the clock speed went up every year.
That was when the "obvious" tech upgrades that didnt exist yet, didnt exist. Everytime new tech comes out, it becomes harder to get large gaps in performance.
Dont quote me
@@matekochkoch Still is standard lol
"A_s_s Odyssey" Really Dawid? XD
😅
@@DawidDoesTechStuff What are you trying to tell us dawid? What are you using the youtube money for
@@sufferr2914 the game is ass and there is a lot of ass in game
@@allahgatorsswamp269 lmao
@@sufferr2914 the game does suck compared to other assassins' creed games
Damn, that motherboard looks so cool. Why does rgb ruin everything. I wish new motherboard came up with cool designs.
Not as cool but asus did something different with their stuff recently
www.google.com/amp/s/theaxo.com/2020/asus-x-bandai-gundam-themed-wifi-6-router/amp/
Because you can't see much of it even with a glass panel. RGB will illuminate surroundings
I agree, the X58 era had some amazing looking motherboards. 😁
You can turn RGB off, you can't turn off the gun/bullet stylings.
But I am sad those kind of designs are no more.
Well RGB is easy because users can change colors or just turn it off to match their builds, whereas with that specific of a motherboard the company would be selling much much less of it due to it being more niche, like you'd have to have THAT style to get that, whereas with RGB you can get almost anything (its best to match RGB though, like Corsair with Corsair, or Thermaltake with Thermaltake) and just changing the color will match it... If the motherboards could be changed by moving stuff around or removing things it would be pretty cool, but that would require much more R&D to make it work properly, whereas throwing RGB on something is quite simple lol.
5:29 Ass Odyssey XD
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
♂️ASS♂️ ODDYSEY
@@DawidDoesTechStuff (☞ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)☞
3:17 son of a ...
good one
TridentZ
Dawid tri-dizzy
Everyone else try-dent-zee
Lol jk I don't care
Tridizzzzzzzzzzy
Me-tradient Zzzz
zed*
So basically they achieved in a decade what happened in one to two years in the '90s, and have raised prices to boot.
10 years ago Intel's cursed axiom of four cores maximum for mainstream was already living its heydays and would be still for years to come. It was only broken by Ryzen a few years ago. Consumer PC CPUs basically froze in time performance wise for a decade. They only got things like new USB or SATA versions, but that's it. Of course Intel kept developing the process technology, but it brought little benefit to the consumers. Like between Ivy Bridge and Skylake, two i5s I had in the past, the performance grew by about 10%, despite there being two whole Intel CPU generations between those two. It was deplorable and indeed the exact reason why Intel has been facing such problems fighting AMD's Ryzen.
Nothing like that ever happened with GPUs. On the CPU side, AMD became incapable of competing, allowing Intel to leisurely sit on its hands for years. On the GPU side, Nvidia never could afford to relax. On the other hand, Nvidia had a totally new market to conquer as well, the computing one with AI, servers, and supercomputers, so they needed to do a lot of work, nonetheless, regardless of the gaming market.
It's similar to cars. It's much easier to increase a car going 50mph by 30% than it is to increase one going 150mph by 30%. Not just because 30% of 150 is 3x larger either. There's more real world limitations to overcome.
I do know what you mean though. I was mad that Intel kept the world stuck on 4 cores for a decade, but in reality it won't take long to catch up to where we would have been if they didn't. Software still needed to support more threads, and we needed process nodes to catch up. A 16 core 65nm would have been too large to produce and the tdp would be through the roof. I'm glad AMD survived the FX Era.
@@TheCgOrion increasing 150 by its 30% is not 3x (450), but it is 1,3x (150 + 150 x 3/10). Of course there are limitations. These limitations are mostly commercial though - there is no need for power like that in the hands of customer. Games would become obsolete too fast, the drivers would get harder to develop, software would have to be optimized, new architectures would fuck up the existing codes etc. It is just an easy calculation of "Is it really worth it?" And "Wouldn't it be better if we made something shit, but very soon so we don't have to work for another quarter?". I'm surprised people see AMD as some kind of savior, even though it has become worse than Intel. Just look at ryzen 5000 prices. Yes, *CORES*, but also *PRICES*. It is expensive as hell, making the mid-range more high-end than ever, successfully destroying that part of the market on their side. Then you have the Intel with it's I5 10400f, which is much cheaper, and more money efficient solution. Then Intel makes you feel nauseous with it's stock RAM speeds and locked OC. The situation is awful rn. Some say that Intel fighting with AMD will make the prices more competitive, but it is just a misconception. Once AMD eats Intel for dinner, they will rise prices so much, that only the R3 and athlon series will be viable options for the money, because R5 and E7 are gonna be lower high end and higher high end.
@@biedronkowestalkere5069 I'm not sure what I said that made you think I was saying it was 3x (partly because I can't open the "read more" for some reason, but I understand the calculation. It does depend on what you're looking at in this CPU situation ongoing. Let's be honest, the i7 6800K and i7 6900K were way over priced, and I think the 6900K (possibly I'm thinking about the 6950K) hit $1700 just before Zen 1 released, for a 6c/12t and 8c/16ct CPU. The correction Zen 1 made to pricing was so enormous that we are still seeing much better pricing. Plus it's on the mainstream platform. Back then 4c/8t was the top of the mainstream desktop platform. It is definitely climbing now that it isn't contested, but that seems to happen every time one company has the lead. I don't see a savior when it happens. I see the end of a monopoly rule over the consumers. All of them should have a little bit better governing of their practices. Nvidia is absolutely terrible when it comes to this scenario. It's a shame though that AMD decided not to correct the GPU market the same way as they did the CPU market. You can't blame them though. The consumers have been telling these companies that they are willing to pay their asking prices. I think it's a little unfair that people see AMD as the savior for another reason. They expect the company that is battling on two fronts, with far less money in their pockets to take another hit and not cash in on the current market. Ultimately it's the consumers who control pricing, but they'll never figure that out as a whole.
@@biedronkowestalkere5069 pmsl total fail
5:50 he forgot to change the benchmark name from r6 seige to shadow of the tomb raider LOL
Dawid: a measly 300 fps
Me sitting there with 30fps on minecraft
yeah, 300 fps with a 3080, it s bad
If that's with rtx 30fps is pretty good!
0.8 FPS with ray tracing on in my potato😂
Well not exactly ray tracing it was a shader mod
@@ayush_k- ah well, as gamers we sometimes have to take what we can get! Plenty of old games to keep you busy! Personally I love old school point and click games so there's always options!
@@Skett Just finished Prince of Persia WW, thinking of trying Just Cause 1
Yeah there are plenty of old games I still enjoy playing. But didn't like WW because it has way more bugs than its prequel Sands of time.But yeah even bugs are fun sometimes.
3:19 Damn you Dawid, this is the second time today!!!
First i got rickrolled by mrwhosetheboss and now you
don't ruin his Rickroll would u....
Holy moly same i just watched mr.whose the boss vid the smartphone is boring 😂
Damn, I thought I was being original. 😂
Last time I was this early, I still had in-person learning
F
Yup.
F
Oof
@@DawidDoesTechStuff Yeah it’s been rough.
Thanks for the video!
I'm a older gamer guy and I am still running a I7-980x @ 4.2ghz on the stock air cooler that came with it.
Still hard to believe it cost $1k new back in the day, but it was the best back then. While not in use anymore, I still have the Nvidia GTX 580s I used in SLI.
While the CPU does run everything I play so far. Watching this answered a lot of questions I had and made me feel my age (bones creaking) LOL
I tried the Cinebench test but used the multicore test and got a 4461 which I assume is not that great by today's standards.
if you're talking cinebench r23, the 5600x actually gets around 11000 and some points, so almost 3x that; but the way it performs in games you'd never think it was that much slower in synthetics
Why not upgrade 🤔
@@Moochi4 At the time of two years ago when I commented. It was more a cost issue. Today, I recently did upgrade and got a 16 core Ryzen, 128 gigs of 3600 ram, and a RTX 3090. Loving the frame rate increase lol 😁
@@RenegadeTM glad to hear it im still rocking the rtx 3060 12gb runs everything smooth as butter had a 1650 pc for 2 years or so then i upgraded and rebuilt my hole system mine a 5600x 32gbs of ram and the rtx 3060 12gb
@@Moochi4 Nice! If it was not for the MSI gaming Trio 3090 I found on ebay for $750, and was certified ebay refurbished. I possibly could still be rocking that I-7 980x with a gtx 1080 lol
my dad's still using a OC'd 920. those CPU's were beasts back then, and not bad at all today.
I used my overclocked i7 970 @ 4.2Ghz for almost 8 years before upgrading to the i7 8700k @ 5.1Ghz I have now, those old X58 platform compatible CPU's were really good performance and value for how long they lasted, even managed to get a kit of 2133mhz DDR3 memory working on it, though it was kinda unstable and had to run it at 1933mhz for 100% stable results.
I used to overlock my 920 with a hyper 212, but now i use that for my new rig and no way I'm overclocking with a stock Intel cooler lol
increse the performacne by buying 4$ xeon
Literally was JUST thinking about this haha great timing my friend!
"16 gigs is enough" google chrome wants to know your location
Another interesting comparison would be the intel i7 8700k, a 6 core 12 thread cpu, vs the Ryzen 5 5600x.
My 8700k is gonna hold on to its pants till ddr5 makes its way in the next year or 2. Ryzen is looking really good tho
That's a good point. I'll see if I can get one for a reasonable price. 😁
@@DawidDoesTechStuff I'd love to see it vs the 9700k due to it being on sale
@@JoeMama-hm7xj 9700K? nah, 9900K or 10700K. 9700K is DOA (no hyperthreading).
Except for the fact that the 9700K ended up delivering about 98% of the performance of the 9900K...l hyperthreading not that huge of a deal with 8 cores...@@saricubra2867
I'm more surprised that a 9 year old cpu is still perfectly capable. I could honestly pair that with a 1650 super or some other low end budget card and be perfectly content with the experience.
Good video. Few thoughts :
1) Always OC UnCore (or DRAM/QPI Frequency for ASUS), to 3,2-3,6GHz on LGA 1366.
2) At stock, RAM frequency may be limited to 1333MHz.
You may need to OC it to at least 160MHz BCLK to actually get 1600MHz as available memory clock.
3) LGA 1366 CPUs DO NOT have a PCI-e controller inside, that's one thing X58 chipset does for them.
I just wanted to stop along and say that you are an absolute legend man. I saw on some other video featuring your channel from about a year back and saw you had a bunch of videos but only got like 200-300 views, even though you put a crazy amount of work into them. Now you are getting more than 100x that! You show us that with enough dedication anyone can become successful. Keeep it up :)
I just replaced my unlocked i7 920 for a 5600X! :D It has served me very well all of these years but it was time.
oooof a 920?! I could clock my 920 quite high, but nothing could make up for it being an old quad-core, those hex-cores were definitely worth the small upgrade price once they were being dumped on ebay from used servers and workstations
i have a stock clocked i7 2600. i might upgrade to a 10600k sometime in the future, idk
Hi! Nice comparsion of CPUs! I like how AMD came back from the dead, or, dare I say it, Ryzen from the ground.
lol
Wasn't the amd phenom was the first 6 core
@@chriswright8074 he said the first commercially easy to get 6 core
@@chriswright8074 it's actually 3 core not 6.. it has 2 modules in one core so now we call it 3core 6threads,AMD even got sued bc of that same story with fx series
😂
Your turn of phrase in this video was a delight as always, it really helps set your content apart from the rest! Also instant thumbs up for rickrolling the lot of us 😂
OC’ing on x58 is great fun but you have to have incredible patience to get it spot on - I’m still using an i7 990x @ 4.4ghz and I play all the latest titles and it’s kills it. I do have a good gpu as well which obviously helps but it’s still a great cpu. Great vid man! 👍
GPU?
"I’m still using an i7 990x @ 4.4ghz and I play all the latest titles and it’s kills it."
Love the video. Take it to its next logical step. Pair the i7 980 with a top of the line video card of the day vs Ryzen 5600x with a current entry level card. Then tweak both to do 60 FPS and compare graphics quality.
I just upgraded from i7 980 to an 5800x :D
Really enjoy these type of videos.
Nice concept Dawid! Thanks for breaking the mold.
And i thought old amd phenom II cpus were first at 6 cores
Pretty sure intel beat them to market by a couple of months.
@@solidstatealchemy9080 k
@@lukasvincourcz7043 bruh y so mad?
@@TheBURBAN111 i'm not mad at all
You know, I'm actually kind of impressed with how it did. Compared to GPUs, anyways.
And here we go guys , David does it again.
Tech Stuff
Man, when you were talking about the mobo, you reminded me of the DFI boards of that time period. I loved that aesthetic back then.
I wonder how much of an impact the spectre/meltdown "fixes" have on that old i7? Might be worth a revisit with them disabled?
Phenom II X6 was the firstr six core.
Wouldn’t be fair comparison since it has 6 threads
@@cocodanuts3497 But, was the first, not the 980,
Even the court disagreed with that. The customers won the lawsuit against amd's lying to them.
@@kaylaandjimbryant8258 The phenom was not effected by this lawsuit. Phenom actually had 6 FPU's and 6 cores. The fx series was effected by this lawsuit as the 6 core had only 3 FPU's
@@Alobster1 ok so what exactly does that mean? What is a FPU? so I can understand exactly how they lied
Good stuff, thanks for the content!
Just finished watching you and Joe talk about who won and who had the hardest time LoL. Both f you are winners for entertaining us. I've been watching both of you for a few months and I was inspired to build my first computer in 20 yrs instead of buying a pre-built. I got an i7-10700K(water-cooled), 32 gig 3200 ram, an Asus Prime z490-P motherboard, a 1TB SSD, a 2gig Seagate hard drive, and a RTX 3070 GPU (I don't game at 4K, just 1080p and sometimes 1440p) in a CoolMaster TD400 case. It wasn't that hard, but it was still a challenge for me LoL.
I do find it amazing though how well the X58 6-cores have held up. They don't seem to really 'struggle' with anything until it comes to the games that heavily utilize AVX instructions.
What games use avx?
@@jamesmcjamesington631 I do.
Great test. I'm running an i7-3930k @4.4Ghz, which is a standard "auto" overclock on the X79 platform, with 32GB of DDR3 RAM @2133MHz (in QUAD channel) - THAT would be a MUCH better comparison as this particular CPU cost aprox. $500 when new.
This is fast becoming my favorite tech channel. Would love to see you and randomgaminginhd do a collab
Just acquired myself a 4K monitor. Nice to see some 4k vids on your channel there Dawid
he literally just rick rolled all of us...
Hahahaha so stealth
For x58, you need to do BCLK overclocks. As far as I remember, to get it stable you'd have to downclock the RAM via QPI underclocking or something. So yes 4.4 Ghz on these babies is usually even the lower end.
2 yrs after this still is a great video, love it
I knew how this would play out, but I was here for the analogies and metaphors. Once again sir, you did not disappoint.
I still have an X58 system as a secondary PC. I upgraded the CPU from an i7-950 to the Xeon X5675 (about $20). Granted, I wouldn’t buy/recommend an X58 system to anyone, it is not a great value. But if you can get one for super cheap or already have one it’s worth playing with overclocking.
I just went from a x5670 @ 4 GHz to a 5900x @ 4.65 / 4.95 GHz. Such a leap in performance! But the x5670 did serve me well for 10 years. The only reason I upgraded was because of the lack of AVX.
My x5675 served me well for almost a decade!
I’m so glad you do this kind of content to be honest not everyone has the mid to high end rigs. Nothing is wrong with gaming with older hardware sometimes it gives you a good experience play some old games don’t like newer hardware
Your content is fun and entertaining,, keep churning those amazing content. You deserve my like and much more subscriber..👍🏻👍🏻
Not related to this vid but I just felt the need to say: You tried my boi, you tried. I'm still proud of you.
You could tell old Timmy was still a bit salty about your respective sub counts lol. You're just funnier man plain and simple
That's still a pretty decent score!
Around 4 core APUs of today
this video has been very helpful. i have an 8 year old i7 3770 on a gigabyte ga-z77-hd3 motherboard and have been looking to upgrade. its not a bad system but is holding my rtx 2060 back. love the videos and you being a fellow canadian, the prices are right on! keep up the good work and Merry Christmas
Nice content Dawid :)
if frame times are good then its still playable on a 60hz monitor. that 3080 really carried it
Ok, that's one of the most badass motherboards I've ever seen. The sniper has a freakin bullet in it.
What are your settings for the overclock? The X58 platform has some important things to keep in mind, for example UCLK and QPI speed who need certain max speeds depending on the BCLK. Also it doesn't like even multipliers. Wouldn't be surprised that's the issue given your description of losing stability completely after such a relatively low clock speed
that overclock and triple channel memory really does give it some durability
Is it just me waiting for ryzen 3 CPU’s to have 16 cores in like 10 years 😂
There are ryzen 3 cpus with 16 cores now tho ;)
@@tedarcher9120 wait a minute......
@@tedarcher9120 where? the most you can get is 4c8t
i5 13th gen is rumored to have 12(6+4) cores and 16 threads while i3 13th gen has 4(4+0) cores and 8 threads... Thanks intel
@@viztiz316 12th gen isn’t even out yet….
In fact i7 980 still usable with good graphics card
Like 16xx series or 2060 with some oc will do great job if u snipe him with few bucks
Yep true
You love doing weird stuff and I love watching. Keep up the great work.
I'd love to see you water cool the little gtx 1650lp oc v.2 you bought and tested a while back. I can't find anyone who's done it.(I own one but don't have a ntx bracket or cooling system to suit.) + I'm limited due to my sff case.
Would be interesting to see the same tests with as mid-range gpu, like an rtx-2060 or rx 5600. I'm guessing the gap really narrows down in that case.
No surprises here, a lot of those first generation 6 core CPU's were optimized for creation and business software, not gaming. And hopefully by late 2021 we can laugh about new parts being so hard to buy.
buying back then a 6 core for gaming was a waste of money.
@@mrn234 That's true, and it's sad that there's many new games are not optimized for multi-core cpus.
@@wildbilltexas They are but its creeping in slowly. Alot are optimized for 4 cores then 6 cores and slowly we get games that are optimized for 8 cores. There are some games you get a good bump with an 8 core compared to 4 or 6 cores.
But when you do other stuff on the side like streaming you should get atleast an 8 core cpu.
Wow. That 2010 CPU is holding its own surprisingly well! That must have been an absolute BEAST back when new.
A friend of mine had a 1st-gen i7, first computer she ever built. She was kinda sad to say goodbye to the old rig when she upgraded.
The i7 was an awesome CPU up until Haswell, then Intel really got complacent. Skylake sucked, Coffee Lake was OK, and Rocket Lake seems to be more of the same unless there are any surprises waiting in the wings.
@@LabCat She could have kept it, as a Guest PC or as a dedicated server. lol but yeah, Sadly Intel just doesn't seem to have that edge anymore, and now AMD whipped out the secret weapon, Intel's got yet to recover. They also lost Apple (who were a MAJOR partner) so that's not helping either. Right now, Intel is mostly surviving in the laptop/UMPC space, but with Ryzen APUs/SoC's coming around, who knows how long that'll last? Maybe they can pull a rabbit out the hat. Until then, AMD is the way for many.
Had the same setup few months ago. Was rocking x58 socket 6 core 12 threads xeons with gtx 1070ti.
To some extent it served me well for like 2 years then i felt so bad performance “bottleneck” in newer games. On top of that tdp was 130W cpu alone and while gaming it reached to 550+.
So i changed my setup to ryzen 5 3600 and omg the performance is mind blowing and total system tdp with same gpu was 350W on max load . I got many videos for reference benchmarks incase anywant to check and might help others while upgrading.
Merry Christmas 🎅
Dude... Comparing anything to a 5th gen ryzen cpu is dooming it to fail. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure the 5600x beats the 10900k in some tasks. Imma go watch the actual vid now, lol
It either beats or ties the i9 in specifically gaming, because productivity workloads do tend to take advantage of 10 cores, except for some isolated cases like Photoshop. It's a great gaming cpu, I have the 5600X and I'm really happy with it
Unless u can actually *buy* the CPU
its 4th gen my dude
5000 series = 3rd gen (Zen 3)
3000 series = 2nd gen (Zen 2)
2000 series = 1.5 gen (Zen+)
1000 series = 1st gen (Zen)
@@ultraviolet2497 I also have the 5600x lol
"Ass Oddysey" sounds like a game that I want to play.
It's like "2001 - a space Odyssey" but Greek - but you still get to visit Uranus!
Hahaha!! I actually think it's better than the official title. 😁
@@DawidDoesTechStufflol it does! Especially when used as the title of another genre......
BTW props for making a 9 minute 37 second video, speaks volumes for your integrity.
Very nice! I have a G1 Sniper X58 that I paired with a i7 980 for iRacing from 2012. Built an X570 with a 3700X a few months ago for MSFS2020.
Hay I have a quad core CPU from that era and it's in my gaming rig
I still have a computer running an i7-860. It's my kid's computer now (until Christmas) but it does okay in gaming. Certainly no match for new processors but, like the video pointed out, an old CPU ages more gracefully than an equally old GPU. Great? No. Playable? Sure.
@@SyntaxTurtle You summarized the video so well. 😁
@@SyntaxTurtle If you had the 2600K instead of the 860, then still good for gaming.
@@saricubra2867 im using the 2400 lol
@@saricubra2867 i have the normal i7 2600. still good
Sarcasm is the language of the intelligent 😎
I was rocking a i7 990 extreme until 3 ish years ago when I upgraded to a 1600x. It was still pushing fine through what I was playing, but it ran pretty hot and i wanted more modern features like NVMe support.
A follow up where you test that theory about gpus would be cool :)
"Dawid tryes to give answeres, for questions that everybody knew the answer for" would be a better channel name.
Bw. I love your vids.
Try running Crysis Remastered and it will cripple both CPUs
It literally feels like the game intentionally ruins performance
I'm still running a I5-4670 LGA1150 chipset. It needs to be put to rest. lol, loving your channel though. Been enjoying listening while working.
Control looked closer than I would have thought anyone else notice
5:54 bruh that’s not r6 siege
That’s a Laura Croft skin in R6 siege lol
I feel that if someone had that cpu for that long of a time its a pretty good performer if you pair it with a less overkill graphics card and as many people don't have 144hz monitors, 60fps is still achievable which I think is kinda impressive
Still got 2 x58 systems going strong. A 980x in a rampage iii extreme and a 920 in a gigabyte ex58 ud5. Surprised how much difference the CPU makes in gaming. Thanks for the video.
Thanks a lot for another entertaining video! Any 1440p/4k benchmarks to see if at some point the bottleneck becomes the GPU? Thanks! :D
980 + mid tier GPU from that era vs. the comming 5600G with no external GPU would be interesting to see.
I was waiting for this cuz I saw your comment on that won video
Thanks for Rick rolling us
I recently upgraded from 2600k to 3900X And didn't expect to be impressed beyond work related tasks but honestly had no clue what I was missing with the single thread uplift
Good stuff!
5:52 It's SOTTR, not R6 Siege :)
CSGO OH ALMOST 100 FPS I7 IS GOOD
AND RYZEN 7 JUST SLAPPED 677FPS AT CSGO
I was shocked at the result. I redid it a bunch of times because I thought it had to wrong. Zen 3 is crazy.
Which gen
Have a good day dawid
Nice video! However it has to be pointed out that and phenom II X6 series were first consumer 6 cores cpus. It would cool to see how "good" they Stack up against 5600x
Don't insult my GTX 580, a dumpster fire is the last thing I'd call it. Good luck finding a faster GPU for £20
I have the same desktop background on my PC. It's really beautiful.
I remember playing battlefield 2 on my old core 2 quad getting 30fps and absolutely loving it.
Nice I ran one of these, well the Xeon x5670 overclocked to 3.8ghz for years until I got a Ryzen 1700 in 2017 and a 3600 last year. Pretty cool how a decade old cpu is still usable today. Nuts when you can get more modern Xeons for $20