Norton's Theorem and Thevenin's Theorem - Electrical Circuit Analysis

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ย. 2019
  • This electronics video tutorial on electrical circuit analysis provides a basic introduction into Norton's theorem and touches on Thevenin's theorem. It explains how to use Norton's theorem to calculate the current flowing through the load resistor in addition to using KVL nodal circuit analysis.
    Schematic Diagrams & Symbols:
    • Schematic Diagrams & S...
    Resistors In Series:
    • Resistors In Series - ...
    Resistors In Parallel:
    • Resistors In Parallel ...
    Series and Parallel Circuits - Light Bulb Brightness:
    • Series and Parallel Ci...
    Equivalent Resistance of Complex Circuits:
    • Equivalent Resistance ...
    How To Solve DC Circuits:
    • How To Solve Any Resis...
    _________________________
    Voltage Divider Circuit:
    • Voltage Divider Circui...
    Current Dividers:
    • Current Dividers Expla...
    Parallel Circuit Challenge Problem:
    • Finding The Current In...
    Kirchhoff's Current Law:
    • Kirchhoff's Current La...
    Kirchhoff's Voltage Law:
    • Kirchhoff's Voltage La...
    DC Circuits Review:
    • Series and Parallel Ci...
    ____________________________
    KCL and KVL Circuit Analysis:
    • Kirchhoff's Law, Junct...
    Thevenin's Theorem - Circuit Analysis:
    • Thevenin's Theorem - C...
    Superposition Theorem:
    • Superposition Theorem
    Maximum Power Transfer:
    • Maximum Power Transfer...
    Physics PDF Worksheets:
    www.video-tutor.net/physics-b...

ความคิดเห็น • 313

  • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
    @TheOrganicChemistryTutor  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/
    Full-Length Videos & Worksheets: www.patreon.com/MathScienceTutor/collections

  • @bramkreulen3553
    @bramkreulen3553 3 ปีที่แล้ว +374

    they should put your name on my diploma cause it wouldn't be there without this

    • @luckymuli3653
      @luckymuli3653 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Where did you school bruh?

    • @bramkreulen3553
      @bramkreulen3553 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@luckymuli3653 shitsville where I did and learnt nothing, then I went for my masters and this man helped me speedrun my highschool and BSc 🙏

    • @georgeclooney6208
      @georgeclooney6208 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂

    • @simmysingh421
      @simmysingh421 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your Europeans are dumbards
      You all learn these in bsc but we study these in high school

  • @melikemadelnaude7914
    @melikemadelnaude7914 3 ปีที่แล้ว +354

    You have helped me in literally every module for engineering. Is there no end to your intellect and your ability to carry it over better than many professors. Thank you genius

    • @timothyediu1785
      @timothyediu1785 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      the meat riding is crazy

    • @metuphys5611
      @metuphys5611 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@timothyediu1785 these first year engineering students are dumb ass hell. No disrespect to the guy (no extensive respect either) but the guy is just reading off a book (or something of that kind) he's teaching is far from being deep. The videos feel basically like chapters of a disgustingly oversimplified enginnering textbook, which im pretty sure they are. So yeah meat riding is indeed beyond belief

    • @christiangaming-fy6rv
      @christiangaming-fy6rv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@timothyediu1785 meat riding isnt the same as being grateful you'd know it if your parrents educated you better instead of beating you.

    • @merlintm7533
      @merlintm7533 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@timothyediu1785please shut up.

  • @Chan-ux7ej
    @Chan-ux7ej 4 ปีที่แล้ว +625

    Since Calc 1, I've been constantly watching your videos due to the simplicity and clearness. Now circuits? Thank you so much for your help

    • @legoman2m98
      @legoman2m98 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      same

    • @uhhidk8253
      @uhhidk8253 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      He's a legend. I love that he's covered so many subjects.

    • @delmaclyrics9456
      @delmaclyrics9456 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@legoman2m98 poop pjdxaya

    • @javedhanif11
      @javedhanif11 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/ewGoVYboigw/w-d-xo.html
      Use this link and for more Electric circuit related numericals.

    • @user-zh4jw9dd4z
      @user-zh4jw9dd4z ปีที่แล้ว

      4:10 why did we substitute Vc from 100? Help pls and why voltage at point B is 0?

  • @benjaminheindl1069
    @benjaminheindl1069 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    As they say "A good YT video is worth a thousand lectures". Thanks man!!!

  • @HamedAdefuwa
    @HamedAdefuwa 4 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    The last part where you went backwards, I was mind blown. You know your ohms law very well.

  • @mintaexx2990
    @mintaexx2990 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I cant believe ive been watching this guy for 5 years now already, all the way from school to engineering at uni now.

  • @buffplums
    @buffplums 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Well done sir! That is one of the best demonstration I have seen for a long time. Good use of visual and audible techniques. As a kinaesthetic learner I was able to combine what you drew on the board with your voice description. As an old engineer of 56 this took me way back to a 16 year old who was t that interested in T+N and just wanted to build exciting projects instead…. Anyway you explained it so well I actually remembered the theory and I think I would say I learnt some very useful theory. Thanks again

  • @Mitali_Victor
    @Mitali_Victor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    that reverse proving made me understand better, teaching is a GOD given talent. Thanks!

  • @kayebaron695
    @kayebaron695 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I appreciate your work! It's very intuitive-- the way you often use voltage. It may be good for folks to know how to find "I Norton" without the use of Thevenin. This circuit is actually much easier if you go about shorting points A and B (since it removes a 3 ohm resistor), doing Source Transformation on the voltage source, and adding the current sources via the Superposition Principle. I ended up with a current source of 19.5 A running through two resistors in parallel. Current division yielded "I Norton."
    Anyway, thanks for your work!

  • @gululu_jnr18
    @gululu_jnr18 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You helped me alot through all engineering modules.....thank you sir ...all the way from Zimbabwe 🇿🇼

  • @mihlet1483
    @mihlet1483 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    omg u are majical. the way u explain and teach everything make all thigs get easy and simple. thanks for this bro

  • @Daniel-go2rn
    @Daniel-go2rn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You're channel has a lot of subjects about math and science that it is very impresive. You're helping me get through this difficult road which is college and i am very thankful your channel exist you're helping peopple get through tough times and I thank you for that. Hope you're doing well and keep up the good work bro.

  • @gen_sound
    @gen_sound 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    thank you so much!! the best explanation that i found in english/russian google
    now I WILL TEACH MY STUDENTS RIGHT

  • @attedau6235
    @attedau6235 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I really appreciate this I got an exam tomorrow been putting in a lot of effort but its been really difficult .These videos have really helped me .

  • @gregwoolley
    @gregwoolley 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nicely and thoroughly explained, much appreciated.

  • @PossumPog64
    @PossumPog64 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Bro got me through calc 1, then calc 2, and now helping me with circuits on my way to being a computer engineer.

  • @omegacanon
    @omegacanon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Helped me review for an on-site interview. Thanks and cheers!

  • @GREGGRCO
    @GREGGRCO 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for the refresher !
    ENJOYED your videos.
    Good teacher!
    Correct me?:
    You do not need (Vc-0)/6. It's just the total voltage Vc across both resistors to B, Vc/6.
    How you said it confused me.
    It's been years.
    For me, what would have helped me
    understand quicker, if you'd said, "Total" current of I1, plus "total" current of I2...I lost that back in time somewhere.
    We all learn and obsess (lol) differently !
    Thanks again! Made the gray cells exercise again !! Broke out my pencil and paper and eraser !
    Good format. Liked how your computer graphics worked. Good calm voice. And your math gymnastics. I love to see how other people learned. You taught me to see several of the formulas differently than I was taught.
    Enjoyed it !!

  • @laso8608
    @laso8608 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks. You just saved my semester

  • @barsilgen120
    @barsilgen120 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks a lot. You are off the charts!

    • @user-zh4jw9dd4z
      @user-zh4jw9dd4z ปีที่แล้ว

      4:10 why did we substitute Vc from 100? Help pls

  • @yusufhalim136
    @yusufhalim136 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks man!!! Such a great teacher 💯
    Much love from 🇳🇬

  • @andrewmaksimovich2432
    @andrewmaksimovich2432 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This man can be a professor for every subject

  • @narayanaswamyprakash7147
    @narayanaswamyprakash7147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Beautifully explained. Thanks

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thevenin? More like “Thanks for filling us in!” Your videos are just the best; keep up the great work.

  • @jonathangeorge5814
    @jonathangeorge5814 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like your vid and esp ur review at the end to show how everything adds up (no pun intended). It helps!

  • @mohnazaidi4666
    @mohnazaidi4666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You became a wizard in that last minute while doing the check - I've never seen someone check their circuit so clearly!

  • @ananyamalasane3781
    @ananyamalasane3781 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    You saved me in entrance prep and you’re still saving me in engineering ✨… my exam’s at 8.30am today cuz it’s 2am rn 💀

    • @ruvanthika8057
      @ruvanthika8057 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How did u do??
      Ig it's JEE ,coz I too a JEE aspirant

  • @user-ko4hl1yy2x
    @user-ko4hl1yy2x ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very clear and useful.Thank you!

  • @adityasharma8319
    @adityasharma8319 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you brother a lot. we were looking for such a simple explaination

  • @Yasir_Aquil_official
    @Yasir_Aquil_official ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing explanation hats off to you .
    And the last one verification was very satisfying 🫡
    Hats off to u sir .

  • @maxwellschaphorst8574
    @maxwellschaphorst8574 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks man you're a great teacher! Excellent explanation.

  • @masonp1599
    @masonp1599 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is definitely a topic on my midterm tmr. As always u the goat.

  • @vaderenseun
    @vaderenseun 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent tutorial video. Thanks for sharing on TH-cam. Best regards and blessings.

  • @robbertvanduijn175
    @robbertvanduijn175 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good stuff man, quite literally 10 times as fast, and much more concise than my prof

  • @mf21jl43
    @mf21jl43 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you brother for sharing 🙏💞
    Splain it's very clear...🤜🤛
    Hope that God always bless you 🙏🙏

  • @arturlima9189
    @arturlima9189 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the video, man!! Helped a lot

  • @privak1175
    @privak1175 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    How come at 2:00 the resistors are in parallel, but in 4:20 they are in series? I am just a little confused since they seem to be exactly the same.

    • @ThilebanTheEngineer
      @ThilebanTheEngineer ปีที่แล้ว

      I have the same doubt. 😇

    • @mghq-mobilegamerzhq2533
      @mghq-mobilegamerzhq2533 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here!

    • @arisariss1897
      @arisariss1897 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      same here

    • @jafarsabbagh7914
      @jafarsabbagh7914 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The resistances are in parallel at 2:00 because he was calculating the resistance, but when he started to calculate the current at 4:20 the current would be the same at both positions because at A there is no current going through so the current would just continue down to B. I3 is the same at both resistances. Another way to think about it is through KCL which states that the current that goes into a node is the same amount of current going out of a node. in this case I3= 0+I4, meaning that I3=I4 so they are both basically I3.

  • @peterchisangamwamba9100
    @peterchisangamwamba9100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thanks a lot.. I like the way you were proving final answers. It made me understand well the division of current and voltage in a circuit

  • @vandansinghal2236
    @vandansinghal2236 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very easy to understand with clarity

  • @geraldmuhumuza4017
    @geraldmuhumuza4017 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is so good man.
    Thanks for enlightenment

  • @electronicdiy8544
    @electronicdiy8544 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You make everything easy.. ♥️

  • @tasty_sugarr
    @tasty_sugarr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the great explanation

  • @AJ-et3vf
    @AJ-et3vf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video! Thank you!

  • @shivanshagarwal866
    @shivanshagarwal866 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing content !

  • @kanankanan8120
    @kanankanan8120 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Doing A great job Brother. Love from Singapore

  • @kaseyjsimpson
    @kaseyjsimpson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I passed my quiz because of this video thank you for the help

  • @richardyamazaki7372
    @richardyamazaki7372 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is a wonderful explanation, saxton hale approves

  • @eie_for_you
    @eie_for_you 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nicely done.

  • @SanGuineeS
    @SanGuineeS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi... I'm Ur New Subscriber... I love watching Ur Videos.. Keep it Up..😍

  • @patrickbelloameh8808
    @patrickbelloameh8808 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Greats and its very simplified

  • @yassintarek1350
    @yassintarek1350 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Crystal clear ma man, Crystal clear

  • @zwakelemasina4157
    @zwakelemasina4157 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are the BEST

  • @amrhelmy5795
    @amrhelmy5795 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    in 1:53, how is the 11 ohms resistor in parrallel with the 3 ohms resistor and its an open circuit??

    • @arisariss1897
      @arisariss1897 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      not that, the end of the 3ohm is touching with the start of the other 3ohm so they are in series not parallel! Unless i am wrong

  • @panashepanaxe629
    @panashepanaxe629 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much

  • @ayoubhannat831
    @ayoubhannat831 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much man.

  • @youssefellouki8874
    @youssefellouki8874 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great methods

  • @jianmingtan1090
    @jianmingtan1090 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good explanation tqvm

  • @top10-r2f
    @top10-r2f ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir 🙏

  • @akumarmalai
    @akumarmalai 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hi thanks the beautiful explanation. I remembered my university days...
    By the way, what app or software do u use to show all the working?? I am a high school maths and physics teacher and this would be handy for preparing videos too. Hope u can help.

  • @akashgillella
    @akashgillella 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very consice video. Thanks a lot- The Organic Chemistry Tutor

  • @deveshmeena5798
    @deveshmeena5798 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    at 6:58 Va should be Vc*R2/(R2+R3) not Vc*R3/(R2+R3). Here R2 and R3 are same so we would get the same answer. Thanks for your video

    • @shichiya5743
      @shichiya5743 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually the video is right by using R3 instead of R2.
      To put it into a perspective, the amount of voltage entering R3 would be the same voltage entering the Load (RL in this case) since R3 and RL are parallel.

    • @deveshmeena5798
      @deveshmeena5798 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@shichiya5743 nope you should watch circuit carefully. Here we are talking about R2 and R3 which are in series not in parallel, you should know the formula for the drop of voltage in series. And Rl which is load is parallel with the resultant of R2 and R3

    • @rradical4714
      @rradical4714 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@deveshmeena5798I noticed the same thing and was wondering if it was a mistake from TOCT, or if I had a poor understanding, but thank you :D!

  • @diptapaul5938
    @diptapaul5938 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    this channel is whole university😊😊😊

  • @johnschopp4566
    @johnschopp4566 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    when you are doing node analysis about node C why is it not (Vc-Va)/3. why did you do Vb instead of Va?

    • @PigeonPulverizer
      @PigeonPulverizer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Might be a bit late, but since I had the same question and figured it out, I thought I would share:
      He took the two 3ohm resistors in series and added them together, causing node A and node C to be identical. Then, since node B is the designated ground (therefore 0V), Vc/6k is the simplified result.

    • @keremhassoy9556
      @keremhassoy9556 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PigeonPulverizer Hi! when you do the calculation it yields two different solutions. (Vb-va)/3 + Va/3 = Vb/3. Not Vb/6

    • @kayebaron695
      @kayebaron695 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PigeonPulverizer, right! This is possible because while finding V Thevinin, he creates an open circuit between points A and B which results in the two 3 ohm resistors being in series. Happy studying!

    • @kayebaron695
      @kayebaron695 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@keremhassoy9556,
      I am not sure what you mean by this. Doing (Vb-Va)/3 would be in the incorrect current direction for this solution. Also, the calculation of (Vb-Va)/3 +Va/3 is TECHNICALLY (Vb-Va)/3 +(Va-Vb)/3; which sums to 0 since you are adding the current value across the same resistor from from both directions. Good luck!

    • @leafsharp
      @leafsharp 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PigeonPulverizer thank you anime guy!

  • @imawatermelon607
    @imawatermelon607 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Grateful for your existence.

  • @user-iz2et4kj9y
    @user-iz2et4kj9y 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks!

  • @pritishjain674
    @pritishjain674 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was new to me thanks

  • @ivancastro365
    @ivancastro365 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why minus the potential at B at 4:15? Why not Vc-Va?

  • @shaadelta
    @shaadelta ปีที่แล้ว

    تملك صوتًا مميزًا، يبعث على الارتياح، فأنا لا أدرس بواسطة مقاطعك فقط، إنما أشحن طاقتي كذلك، شكرًا لك

  • @spookytofu2078
    @spookytofu2078 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @ahmedezaldean1743
    @ahmedezaldean1743 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    man i love you

  • @mercychoka2636
    @mercychoka2636 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks indeed

  • @GeorgeRaveen
    @GeorgeRaveen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @erin7244
    @erin7244 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    God bless you sir

  • @deema1737
    @deema1737 ปีที่แล้ว

    bro knows everything

  • @ninjawarriors2838
    @ninjawarriors2838 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This bro is holding way to my Engineering degree

  • @GREGGRCO
    @GREGGRCO 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh yeah, and checking the answer too ! Super! Always did that ! Great !
    Thanks. What software are you using?

    • @R3mix97
      @R3mix97 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's honestly probably Paint or Photoshop with a drawing tablet connected

  • @sapir3xl497
    @sapir3xl497 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mantap kimia tutor

  • @irwinchee6260
    @irwinchee6260 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bless you

  • @robonkenhout7965
    @robonkenhout7965 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Question; at one point Vc was 66.8V, then at the end it was 60V. Is this because the load resistors was connected?

  • @rahmaahmed2525
    @rahmaahmed2525 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    حسبنا الله في هندسة شبرا و في قسم اتصالات وفيا و شكرا جزيلا لصاحب الفديو

  • @fatemehmohamadzade5023
    @fatemehmohamadzade5023 ปีที่แล้ว

    great💛

  • @leviackerman-ri5rt
    @leviackerman-ri5rt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    watching this the night before my test help

  • @mwenge6355
    @mwenge6355 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is the circuit at 1:45 in parallel but the circuit at 3:19 the 3 ohm and 3 ohm resistor are in series. Please explain!

  • @zeiadalkandari5299
    @zeiadalkandari5299 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks

  • @bondepapo3484
    @bondepapo3484 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video!! Which software is used for the drawing part?

  • @prezlamen
    @prezlamen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why on 2:00 you calculated as a parallel and on 4:24 as in series? Sorry I dont understand,to me looks the same ,beacuse you removed "Rl" ; I see only one way for current to flow.
    Your videos is one of the most helpfull!You use better concept than school`s.

    • @allyhanaffy2329
      @allyhanaffy2329 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      2 years and still no reply:( do you have the answer already by any chance? I want to know

  • @bellzon4086
    @bellzon4086 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can someone explain how in 2:05 they are parallel they seem to be in series?

    • @Hans-pt7qf
      @Hans-pt7qf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      there's a node in between, they aren't directly connected

    • @bellzon4086
      @bellzon4086 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Hans-pt7qf but he says in 4:19 that they are in series?

  • @natashab8110
    @natashab8110 ปีที่แล้ว

    how do you know which resistor is the RL? is it stated in the question already? genuinely asking :) great video btw

  • @dovydasvaiksnys3807
    @dovydasvaiksnys3807 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just an advice for your tutoring from what i personally find confusing. Can you explain where you get point C in your nodal analysis? I understand A and B but does C come from? lets say you have different circuit with things all over the place. How you determine where are you going to put that point C ? Like whats the logical reasoning for it...

    • @afif4738
      @afif4738 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nodal analysis deals with node voltages. So place your point C,D,E… on the essential nodes. Search essential nodes if you don’t know what they are. It’s where 3 or more branches meet.

  • @anthonyokonkwo3493
    @anthonyokonkwo3493 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How did you get the 24 that you used to solve the Norton's resistance ?

    • @Lambo-3-6
      @Lambo-3-6 ปีที่แล้ว

      24 is used to get rid of the fractions, 24 is in the table of 6 and 8.

  • @ozgurevik5280
    @ozgurevik5280 ปีที่แล้ว

    İ cant speak English but i am this is understant , teşekkürler

  • @devanshrathod7060
    @devanshrathod7060 ปีที่แล้ว

    is it compulsory to calculate with KCL ??? can we calculate this sum in norton thm using KVL??? Plz reply....

  • @DarkLord-pm1eg
    @DarkLord-pm1eg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've got a question.... At 2:40, we're supposed to add a short circuit to 6 ohms load, right? As far as I know, we need to add a short circuit on the load, when we use Norton's theorm, and open circuit when we use Thevinin's theorm. Correct me, if I am wrong, please.

    • @pawanbhatt1767
      @pawanbhatt1767 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes

    • @zamba4882
      @zamba4882 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pawanbhatt1767 so we shouldn't calculate r3 i think

  • @alanx4121
    @alanx4121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is R3 added parallel and not serially to Rn?

  • @dillanio9191
    @dillanio9191 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How to identify the Load Resistor? Is it always the one on the far right side of the circuit or is there any other specific method to identify it? Btw, superb explanation, you are really helping me for my exam!

    • @sebastianionita8479
      @sebastianionita8479 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Load Resistor is always the resistor that you define as the output of the circuit. Usually, it is on the far right of a circuit schematic.

    • @bartimaeu1
      @bartimaeu1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Usually denoted by RL

    • @EnderSpy007
      @EnderSpy007 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Usually its on the far right, but if the circuit is decently complex your professor should be telling you what the load resistor is anyways.

  • @vibes_updates
    @vibes_updates ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello, thanks for the explanation,
    Please I wish to know how we came about 24 while looking for the voltage vc

    • @Shrutzy
      @Shrutzy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bsc 24 comes in both the tables of 6and 8 so its used to make the calculation easy thats all

  • @pdp_29
    @pdp_29 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why did we calculate vc?

  • @giangtruong2327
    @giangtruong2327 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    when we calculate the value of R Norton can it be ( 3 ohm in series 3 ohm) and parallel with 8 ohm it'll lead to different answer. So is it wrong ?

  • @neoanderson7714
    @neoanderson7714 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    excuse me sir sometime i really confuse why dont we apply KCL at the loop so we can get I1 = (100+7)/8 = 13.375 that why some time we use KCL,KVL law ?