Husband’s Crazy Ex Is Trying To Steal Our Money
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ม.ค. 2024
- 💵 Create Your Free Budget! Sign up for EveryDollar ⮕ ter.li/6h2c45
📱Download the Ramsey Network App ⮕ ter.li/ajeshj
🛒 Visit The Ramsey Store ⮕ ter.li/7vyom2
📞 Have a question for the show? Call 888-825-5225 weekdays from 2-5 pm ET or send us a message ter.li/n88ly5
Explore More Shows from Ramsey Network:
🎙️ The Ramsey Show ⮕ ter.li/ng9950
🍸 Smart Money Happy Hour ⮕ ter.li/9gcp3d
🧠 The Dr. John Delony Show ⮕ ter.li/2u3mc0
💰 George Kamel ⮕ ter.li/1elws8
💡 The Rachel Cruze Show ⮕ ter.li/n2u6jc
💼 The Ken Coleman Show - Highlights ⮕ ter.li/1rbjr2
📈 EntreLeadership ⮕ ter.li/ktxv2k
Ramsey Solutions Privacy Policy
www.ramseysolutions.com/compa...
It doesn't sound like it's the ex that's money hungry. I'm glad Dave stood up for the kids by telling the caller her husband has a responsibility to support those kids. The judge will decide how much support he pays, not the ex-wife.
Calls her a money hungry ex, but goes on to admit that the ex has never asked for any type of increase in child support or extra money. She’s just making this all up in her own head.
Don’t marry a man with kids if you can’t accept that he has financial responsibilities to them that can also sometimes change or increase.
Dave’s advice is wrong. Depending on the state the support order was issued, both of their incomes could be used in the calculation for child support. MD is one of those states. He did not ask where the support order came from nor what the details of it were. If this woman thought this was going to be the case, it probably is.
Family courts are stacked against guys & its part of downfall of our society. It’s making guys run from marriage & responsibility. Women rarely take responsibility for their mistakes. 👊🔥
Kristy, the better answer would be to eliminate child support... You can't see where the money's going, and it has allowed some women to completely just not work at all to the point where they can live off child support and child tax credits.
@@barnabusdoyle4930 - Dave is a dick on this issue, and that comes from his religious crap. I normally agree with everything he says, but on child support, guys can't see where the money is going.
DAVE! This is a state by state thing. I live in Ohio. My husbands child support increased bc we’ve been married for longer than 7 years and I “supplement” his income (said his ex’s lawyer to a judge)… so yes, the ex can take the married couples money depending on where you live and how long you’ve been married. Hope this helps!
Doesn’t sound like the ex wife is the wife who is money hungry…
This
My friend has a 200k child support bill (it was backdated). She’s remarried and has a HHI of at least 300k. She refuses to let him see the kids. Very sad.
She may not have been money hungry, but it's a legit fear. Child support is unconstitutional. You can't see where the money is going.
@@bherber IT IS constitutional. The only thing is that the ex wife should report month by month how is this money spent. And if it's not, it should go to a protected bank account in the name of the kids
Well if you see a kid that has been fed, cleaned, clothes, has school supplies, is in any extracurricular activity, has a phone, uses the internet, has a bed with bedding. Your money is going towards half of all those costs and thats just the basic stuf. That does t include typical extra parenting costs which includes trips for the child, school field trips, travel sports, birthday parties, sleepovers, school fundraisers, play dates and the many other cost occurred when raising a child @bherber
Dave is like "You married a man with an ex wife who have children together; deal with it.
I think we have a money hungery new wife
Dave, in the state of MD, the courts take account all money coming into the home for child support payments. This happened to my boss. Her husband paid child support. after new marriage it was re-computed way up due to her income being added to the calculation. they decided to wait for 3 years before they felt financially stable to have a child. She was a good boss to me.
He had one marriage end in ruins. Why TF did he sign up for another round?
Caller is the money hungry one.
Why should her money go to support his kids? She just wants to protect her income and I don’t blame her.
@@tracy5721 When you are married your income combines. When you marry a divorced person, all of their issues come with the package.
@Tracy5721 - it’s called marriage.
If you want nothing to do with the kids, just date.
@@emilyh6293 exactly.
No she's not dick... She's just afraid of her filing for a modification. Child support is unconstitutional. You can't see where the money is going.
I wish Dr. John was there to press into why she was concerned about the the ex and their money.
Dave, you’re wrong. Depending on the state the child support order was issued in, just living with another person could increase child support. Maryland is one of those states, but there are others. Each state has different laws and Dave needs to have a producer in his ear to correct him on this.
new spouses are so weird!!!
$300-$500 a month isn’t money hungry. It doesn’t even cover 1/2 of the child care costs in most states.
She's ridiculous
She probably the gold digger.
a woman stealing your child from you doesnt do anything for you either. How about she gives the kid to the new wife and then the old mother pays the new wife for her services that she couldn't make it there for.
@@hanselito2416 um the women had the kids. The new wife sounds like she could care less about them!
@@HTOWN535 its the mans kid that clearly isnt getting adequate support from the mother but has a welcoming home with the father
Actually, in California, if you move someone in to your home, they take the fact that now you are paying less in rent and expenses into consideration because there is another person in the house and your expenses are cut. You can no longer get divorced and move in your new person without it affecting your support. My sister broke her ankle and told her ex husband that her boyfriend at the time, now husband, was going to be staying there to help with the kids until she could get back on her feet. Her ex husband said it was o.k. He then proceeded to take her to court, again, to try to say that the boyfriend had completely moved in and he should be able to pay less in support. First of all, what he paid her in the first place did not even cover hardly anything. Luckily my sister had kept the emails from the ex husband where he said it was o.k. Then my sisters boyfriend had to show proof that he owned his own place (mortgage papers) and paid his own utilities etc. Of course the ex husband lost in court. Stupid ex took her to court I don't know how many times for stupid reasons and lost every single time. The last time the judge had enough and made him pay her legal expenses, he never took her back to court after that. Also, as soon as you get married, your alimony stops. No more moving in someone until the alimony runs out.
That is diffrent than a spouses income. Spouses income is not taken into account when setting child support in CA. Expenses of the parent are. Some states do take spousal income into account. Not the two largest, CA or TX
I do like when court systems track the filings of both parties. Judges can see when someone is wasting the court’s time. I wish all states were required to do this.
She isn't "crazy" if she wants to get child support to feed his kids. He sounds like a d-bag.
He or her
The caller was asking about the order increasing because he's now married. And some judges will include the new spouse's income when determining child support.
@@RepentImmediatelyI don't think that's legal since the new spouse isn't party to a divorce decree.
Lmffaaoooo you’re so weird dude! How are you blaming the husband, when the caller is the wife? The wife is the one paranoid and calling the ex greedy! Not him! Smh 🤦♂️
How are you blaming the husband, when the wife is the one calling in, and calling his ex names? The husband hasn’t done anything wrong. Blame the new wife! Misandry is wild 😂
Maybe talk to a lawyer that specializes in family law in your state. Dave is not a lawyer and might be wrong about this.
Be wary of anyone who refers to their ex as "crazy". He had a child with this woman so what exactly does that say about his judgment?
She wants all dads money to go to the kids she will have. Amazing how second wives have this notion that the first kids should just vanish into thin air.
This is so true. I notice that goes on alot too
My step grandma did that she was 19 when she met my grandpa they had three kids and when he passed she wanted no contact at all with the family didn't even let my uncles see or talk to anyone
it's what is taught in skank school
i wish they had called her out on that
She was asking about if HER income will be included in determining the child support order and unfortunately, the answer Dave gave is not accurate. Some judges will look at total household income meaning, her husband's income AND her income.
So you just got married and already calling the ex crazy .. she sounds ridiculous and is up for a rude awakening
Women know women more than men do, so sounds pretty accurate
Husband has good persuasion skills lol
Maybe so. Especially if the hubby is immature, biased, made up stories about the X. (poor him) She will find out the hard way..
She fell for all of his stories.
This woman doesn’t like hubs money going somewhere else(to his kids). This is her problem, not anyone else.
Not sure what the law is in TN, but in MA child support is based on household income. If she gets married, then there is a good possibility that her income will be fair game.
Funny how wanting child support is only called being money hungry when it's taking resources away from the man who would otherwise be spending that money on HER.
She was asking about whether her income will be factored into the child support order. And it's definitely possible that it will be.
@@RepentImmediatelyThat’s a perfectly normal question to ask. However, she’s calling the ex money hungry while simultaneously admitting that the ex has never even asked for more money. She’s making this all up. She’s bitter about this man helping to support his own children and she’s not shy about showing it.
If they don't want to pay child support, they should file for sole custody. Either you raise the kids or you pay for them. That's how it works.
Then they'll be spending more money on the kids unless they're selfish evil abusive/neglectful parents.
New wife just needs to stay in her lane from the sounds of it. She just called the mother of his children crazy and made a bunch of assumptions. You know what they say about assumptions.
Might not help if he’s also paying alimony
this lady needs to speak w a family lawyer and understand how child support works. every state is different. child support can be negotiable between the 2 parties.
Generally, child support is not negotiable.
Her inability to articulate herself well speaks to her immaturity and reveals that she is the only one here who is money hungry.
Articulate is not a reflexive verb.
Something to look into with this, Child Support. I have my daughter and my ex live in Florida. I was living in New York at the time.. my ex found out I was dating someone new she thought I marry that person went back to court and try to get more money, combining both new income allegedly. The court investigated and found out I wasn’t married if I was they told me yes they take the new income into consideration since I’m married I didn’t know that so maybe some state does it some state don’t
My brother in-law had his kids full time but somehow he had to pay child support to his ex-wife. When he hired a better lawyer, that ended and he got child support from her. Until she quit her job when she had another baby and lived off her new husband. Thankfully all the kids with the old wife are all legal adults now.
It is obvious who the earner is in this marriage. Spoiler: it ain't Einstein's great granddaughter here.
If she wasn't earning anything significant, she wouldn't be concerned about her income being factored into HIS child support order which can definitely happened. Dave misinformed her.
@@RepentImmediatelyEach state may be different, but in my state your spouse's income is not factored into the child support determination.
In that case, malibu stacey needs to definitely put her money & income into a trust the husband is not entitled to.
Everyone needs to keep watching the Ramsey Show ! The content is great and it has really helped me with my financial literacy and understanding :) keep it up guys!
Caller: Can she get more money since we got married
Dave: She can't
George: Has she made contact
Caller: No...I just want to be sure she can't take more money
And yet some judges do factor the new spouse's income into the child support order. Dave gave her wrong information.
@@RepentImmediately Do they factor in a negative income.
@@JustinCase780no the children existed before this marriage, dad should have factored that in before taking on someone with debt or added expenses. Becoming a step parent is a legal obligation. Don’t like that don’t marry anyone with minor children, it’s not that hard to avoid
You are absolutely right...when they re-evaluate his income they do take "in to consideration" the income of the wife is she is a wage earner! @@RepentImmediately
Dave needs to go to family court for a day and just watch
Yep. The court’s definition of a father’s financial responsibility is every last nickel they can squeeze out of him.
all these crazy people have marriages and im over here struggling to get a girlfriend
Great catch there. 🤪😂
He married a smart one. 😂
He did. Some judges do consider the new spouse's income when determining child support
@@RepentImmediately this is true. It’s not official, because when it’s the man that gets custody and the wife remarries, they don’t want the woman or her new husband to have to pay. But judges, “at their discretion“ will make a man pay if he gets remarried. It’s funny how that works.
@@wordsalad01it can and does happen. And you should be careful about judging people. Dave is a high earner who's giving misinformation.
He's giving excuses not to marry her.
The caller said he was her husband.
So does the video title.
If you are in a relationship with someone who has children by a previous marriage, you will be connected to this person from now on. Even when the children are grown, you still have events such as weddings, birthdays, holidays, etc, etc, etc. Hopefully, everyone can act like adults for the sake of the children, but horror stories abound.
She sounds like she's going to be a grrrrreat step-mom.
"We just want to protect ourselves" - from his legal obligation to his kids?? She's going to be a fun stepmom... yikes
More like a stepsister
Considering that some judges will factor her income into the child support order, she made a very unwise financial decision when she married a man with children.
@@RepentImmediatelymarriage isn't just for financial reasons, though.
@@RepentImmediately that's her problem
The EX is a mooch like most of you
How do I protect...I mean me and my husband... That tells you which one is the gold digger, and it's not the ex.
Do you actually think she should want to support his kids out of her income? She didn’t make them. Why should she owe money for them?
The ex isn’t the crazy one ☝️
His money should go to looking after his children. None of your business lady
Her money may be factored into his order, though.
@@RepentImmediately file that under things she should have considered before marrying him.
These “new” girlfriends never want the kids taken care of, only themselves. Poor morality. You’re next!
She was concerned about the order being increased because of the possibility that her income will now also be considered and that is a possibility. Dave isn't an attorney.
You sure the ex is the crazy one here?
A new spouse's income, or the total household income, can absolutely be factored into how much a parent is ordered to pay in child support. Dave, you need to get legal counsel on this matter and issue a correction.
In what state?
@@juicysmith38235considering Dave isn't an attorney, he can't give legal advice in ANY state. If you want to see if it applies in your state, look it up.
@@zvmQru02wealth building is a separate matter than household income. I'm talking about household income.
Sounds like somebody went through a mid life crisis and left his family for a younger woman.
Who knows. Maybe his wife was cheating?
Yes cos there's a zero percent chance that she was toxic to be with and he did what was best for him by divorcing her. Yes we know it's always a midlife crisis and never anything else..........
@@luminous6969 did I say any of that?
@@blodus4521 You literally said it word for word lol.
@@luminous6969 did I ever say it wasn't his wife
Unlike alimony, remarriage does not have a direct impact on child support obligations in Colorado. Child support is primarily based on the financial responsibilities of the parents to their children, regardless of their marital status or any new relationships they may enter.
Well said dave
For child support, the courts can require you submit tax returns and they share them with the ex.
Lit ep
This was a dumb phone call, she seems insecure.
Her income could very well be factored into the child support order. She was given misinformation on this call. What was dumb was her marrying a man who has children.
A friend's father divorced the stepmother so my friend's child support would not increase. So yes, household income does come into play at times.
What I think she’s worried about is if income earnings is taken of their whole household - ie: her and his salary.
I had my ex girlfriend (the mother of my daughter) try argue that. Ie: because my wife earned a good salary - her child maintenance should be doubled.
That would be something to find out BEFORE getting married to a person who has kids.
I know a woman whose income was included in the total family income of her husband that was used to determine the amount of child support.
what state? That is insane.
That was awkward lol
It sounds like to me that she is worried that because they got married that the ex-wife can come in and ask more child support because the new wife income is added in. Child support is only based on the person who has the children with it does not affect the other party whatsoever.
So, in other words, there isn’t a problem with the ex. This call shows there is a problem with the new wife. She needs to be very careful. Don’t put yourself in the middle. You will lose.
She will be put in the middle oft the judge decides to factor her income into the child support order, which can happen, despite what Dave thinks.
Why should her income go to pay for another woman’s kids? She shouldn’t have to support them; she didn’t make them. That’s not being money hungry.
@@tracy5721 I think the theory is this. It's not her income (directly) that's going to the kids. Rather, the court is essentially treating her income as covering a portion of the household bills (which factor into the equation) and is thus increasing the amount of the husband's income that is "freed up and available" to pay in child support.
There are states that do include step parents income, so total household income, when calculating child support. She knew the children existed and were minors when she married him and she should be ready, willing, and able to be a bonus parent including paying a court decided % of their income will go to child support (and likely college expenses as well) If that bothers her she shouldn’t have married him and should correct her mistake.
He sured arrived a gem of a new wife. I don’t want my husband to fulfill his financial obligations to his kids. Seems the only one Money Hungry is the new wife
THANK YOU for providing SOUND ADVICE here and not allowing this girl to triangulate you! 🥰
The advice given wasn't accurate. Some judges will factor a new spouse's income into a child support order.
@@RepentImmediately I was thinking that would be "possible"...however the "factoring in" is very likely only due to the fact that living alone or being the only working adult in a home would produce higher overall expenses needing to come out of the father's income. So it's would only have an "indirect" affect.
Think of it this way. If he had to pay 100% of rent (or mortgage) AND 100% of the utilities...and there was not someone with a second income in the "household" to pay their share, there's likely a higher number assigned as what he realistically "needs" just for his own basic expenses. It is not likely a big difference.
im more so wondering if the ex and husband have a mutual agreement rather then court ordered. could be what shes afraid of, when the ex demands more money after a few years.
Child support is not up to Dave and it is not up to him getting a raise. It is up to the judge, who can do ANYTHING.
You’re ok baby girl 😅😁
Dave. I have seen domestic relations use both incomes to get more money. Oh yes I have!!!
Yeah, ex is entitled to court ordered child support...which could men husband can't afford to pay for your vacation because $6K per year (or whatever) is going to the child support. He made that kid, he needs to support it. Next point, anything that he is required to pay a portion of, like 50% of uninsured medical expenses or dance lessons, tutoring or anything else the court mandates, he should pay directly to the person owed--the doctor hospital, tutor, or whoever, not to the ex. And Dave is wrong--in many states the husband's household income can be used to calculate child support, so in that case the new wife's income would also count. By the same token, if the new wife has a baby and wants to be a stay at home mom, he can petition the court to decrease child support based on her lack of income in that situation.
So funny to hear these women hold to one set of principals towards their husband's ex-wife, and to an opposite set of principals towards their own ex-husband. And this shoe gets moved to the other foot perpetually from one marriage to the next.
Second marriage is 66 percent chance of getting divorced.
Third marriage is 73 percent chance of getting divorce.
You shouldn't married again after the third divorced.
You are the problem. 😂
And never marry one with kids to another!
Wrong. State by state Dave!!
Funny to hear this. Some women are with the guy and hate extracting resources UNLESS they are the ex demanding the resources. Unlimited child support well above the needs of the kid is great UNTIL its affecting your household. 😂😂😂
The hosts drive me crazy sometimes but I love when TH-cam sees through the callers.
Calls the ex “money hungry” but she hasnt asked for more money…… New wife needs to chill.
Why did the caller wait till after she married this guy to worry about something like this?
She couldn't bring up a single reason to support the ex being "money hungry" or problematic.
The guy in the middle of this "threesome" is really in for a heck of a ride -- and I don't mean from the ex...
Daddy mama baby drama
Dave, sorry to say this but once again YOU ARE WRONG. In certain states including here in Florida, all household income can be taken into account for upward support modifications. I’m not a Lawyer but I am well versed in this subject and in particular, when it comes to child support, the state will see to it that the ex gets her upward modification because the state will in turn, get matching federal kickbacks under Title IV-D laws.
I thought (read it somewhere) though that ex-wife can somehow put claim to ex-husband's social security, even if he re-married?
After 10 years of marriage, yes. But it doesn’t reduce ex-husband’s amount received.
The above reply is correct, AND the ex wife can't have re-married. So if she was married to her ex for over 10 years and never remarried, then she can still get the bonus from his social security. But it doesn't subtract from what he gets.
Yep…and even if he had 6 ex wives of over 10 years length each, they could each receive half his social security
oh my, ok thank you. @@bkspielman0
She doesn’t want this guy to support his kids she wants ALL the money.
If the new wife has her own treasure trove of money that she is wanting to protect from the ex-wife, she did not reveal that. Those kids are his responsibility to nurture and support from the time he created them throughout their adulthood. The father should contribute to raising his children regardless of how much successful income increases he will have. She makes herself sound like an evil stepmother who doesn't want his children properly cared for financially, she wants to keep all his money for herself (and potentially any new children she will create in the future.) Personally, I wouldn't want a man that didn't take seriously his commitment and obligation to his children.
oh boy this girl sounds young lol
Dave should not comment on things he is not an expert in. He is not an expert in family law or child support matters. Contrary to popular belief, child support is based on household income, which can include the new wife's income. The caller needs to seek legal counsel instead of the Ramsey show.
I suspect child support calculations will vary by state.
@@thirdcoast-nx7jx Yes, and judges probably have a lot of discretion. Dave and other christian commentators do not understand the reality of divorces and family courts. Christian men are ill prepared for divorce, and should better protect themselves upfront.
This chick sounds super young, I bet she’s married a much older successful man and the ex wife is jealous of the new young wife.
This was painful to listen to
That's pretty weird to call someone money hungry off of a hypothetical.
The caller is the money-hungry one, not the ex-wife. It hasnt even come up and shes asking for advice on how to make sure her husband doesn't end up paying more support for the children he created. She's gonna be a great stepmom.
More support because of HER income
why shouldn’t she not want to support his kids out of her income?
@@RepentImmediately Her income isn't considered when determining the amount of his child support. But increases in HIS income certainly are - and it sounds like she doesn't think his kids should get any benefit from his increasing income (i.e. she thinks that money is hers, alone)
@@tracy5721 It's not her income. It's his and legally and morally a percentage of that should be given to support his kids. Her income has nothing to do with it.
Don’t get together with anyone with a “crazy ex.”
Miss younger and hotter doesn't sound too bright 😒
That is the idea! Traded one in for a newer model
This call is useless. Absolutely useless
Dave is not correct. They can take the salary of both people, including the new spouse. It depends on the situation. Dave is not an attorney. He shouldn’t be answering questions like this.
And you are?
@@alinatamashevich3354she's not the one giving misinformation
@@RepentImmediately Again, what state do you hold a law license in?
She sounds insecure and paranoid
She sounds like a 21 year old married to a 60 year old man.
What a weird call. Ex doesn't call, doesnt make threats, etc etc and this new kid on the block is calling the mother money hungry and someone she needs to protect her husband and herself from. Lmao. Okayyyyyy. Young wife has got more imagined issues than a magazine subscription. If you dont hear from them, thats good! 😂
Total household income, meaning her husband's income AND her own income, can be factored into a child support order.
@auemmjee I would think that would depend on the state. Where I live it is not a factor, it is the Father's and Mother's Incomes only. However, if he gets behind then yeah they can take the tax refund if he and the new spouse were to get one. The new spouse would have to file that innocent spouse form. Results of that may vary.
The husband probably told horrible stories about his wife to his then girlfriend and the now new wife is scared that the ex will go after them for money as revenge. She definitely sounds like a home-wrecker who is not only naive but also paranoid that her husband is such a prize that the ex will go after them. She thinks the ex will extort them even though she has never reached out…. Why is she made the bad guy with no evidence? If anything it reflects on her husband and what he is feeding her to get out of CS. Child support is part of being a parent and it is the reality of marrying a man who has children.
@@RepentImmediatelyI am a divorce lawyer of 21 years experience , and where I practice it is just the husbands income NOT household income. I do not know where it would be based off of household income.
@@karindacurran6868in Wisconsin it can be based off of household income. That may not be the norm but it's a possibility. And as an attorney, you know that Dave should not be giving legal advice. It's outside his scope of expertise.
Can the children be supported? What is wrong with that?
That wasn't the question. She's concerned about her income being factored into the child support order and Dave is not informed on the subject.
@@RepentImmediately In my opinion, she will end up leaving, it sounds simply too much for her.
@@garys8415dating a man with children is a very poor decision. Marrying him is even worse.
So if a man loses his job and has zero income, should his child support get reduced?
If he dies and that income goes to zero, should they sell everything his new spouse was bought?
I looked it up on google and it says this: "If you have no income, the court can set your modified child support amount based upon your past employment, your ability to work, and the current federal minimum wage."
Assuming their mother dies and he had sole custody of his children, if he lost his job, should he starve them? 🤡
no, man's salary can ony go up according to how the courts enforce the idea of a man's primary and only relvent role to be an ATM. If he changes jobs to one that happens to pay less, the judge will impute his earning capacity as the higher amount unless he can prove some kind of hardship. This, IMO, is the single biggest problem with child support rulings, reduces everything down to income and pretty much ignores every other contribution that is needed to raise kids.
The caller is the problem. Not the ex wife.
Worth a bet that this young sounding thing was the affair partner during husband’s failed marriage 😂. Let me guess, she bought his sob story hook line and sinker, and she’s much younger and a gold digger. Congratulations to the ex wife are in order.
The only reason this call got passed through was because they knew it would make for a juicy title/potentially good entertainment. It was not what they were hoping for hence Dave and George asking all those “digging” questions lol. Next caller
Child support is based on his income and this woman is not an awesome person. She will be the cause of many future issues with his children. I feel sorry for the kids. He married a terrible person.
Women fighting over a man resources shock. Why on earth this guy would get married a second time didn't learn the first time huh. Wonder what her stance will be when her marriage goes bust
Actually no one is fighting. She is afraid ... And HE chose that woman .... I wonder if she was the reason the last marriage ended ....
I can't bash this woman, we didn't get much of an explanation.
I have been in her shoes. I support my fiance paying his fair share in child support, however my current issue is what happens after we get married.
The crazy ex has threatened to sue for yrs. She is angry & states her children "will get less" now that he wants to get married & have more children.
My concern is if we get married, have kids, etc and down the line when we're old & he dies, will the crazy ex or their kids sue my deceased husband and I's estate?
I would not want to end up an elderly homeless woman bc I married someone with kids. I am not greedy, however some of yall will probably say I am bc I want to keep a roof over my head.
I will not get married until I seek legal counsel!!!
You should have your own home with only your name on the deed. You can leave it to him If you were to die first.
Why do you need to marry him? What you should talk to an attorney about is the various documents and estate planning strategies that allow for many of the benefits of marriage while not creating the same risks.
Wow
B’s be crazy… women have it extremely lopsided in their favor in family court and they always want more
Money is the root of all evil.
The LOVE of money is the root of all evil.
Fool 😂
My 11 year stepson came over to visit this weekend and didn’t have a coat. Yep, no coat. It was 39 degrees. He came over in his teenage brothers oversized old sweatshirt hoodie. The ex gets close to $900 a month in child support. My husband had to go buy him a coat this weekend smh.
Are you new to having children? Mom may have fought with him 20 minutes over bringing a coat. Since you seem to begrudge the kid for wearing his brothers hoodie (likely his choice) then insist coat stays at your house.
Is her rent/mortgage $3,000???
That’s his child. He should buy a coat for them. Do you want him to buy a coat for any child you have with him?
Heaven forbid a man have to spend more than $x and buy his child a coat.
@@zvmQru02 you don't spend the same amount on a child every single month. Maybe she makes less than him, maybe she covered medical bills he didn't, maybe she was sick and missed work. The point is that children have needs and their father should be able to provide more than just the bottom line amount if needed.