Movie Couples Therapy: The Phantom of the Opera
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ค. 2024
- Use code CINEMATHERAPY60 to get 60% off your first Factor box at bit.ly/3UR66TS!
What is the difference between lust and love? Or between obsession and love?
Licensed therapist Jonathan Decker and filmmaker Alan Seawright use the relationships in The Phantom of the Opera to talk about healthy and unhealthy relationships. They take a look at the possessive, obsessive, controlling nature of the relationship between the Phantom and Christine, and how the Phantom takes advantage of her grief and her naivety. Then they contrast that with Christine's relationship with Raoul, and how that one doesn't start in the best place (Raoul doesn't really listen to her at first...) but grows into a healthier relationship about sharing a life together. They also talk about how Emmy Rossum is a fantastic Christine, Minnie Driver is delightful, and they, um... disagree about Gerard Butler and some of the filmmaking choices.
Support us!
Patreon: / cinematherapy
Merch: store.dftba.com/collections/c...
Internet Dads Popcorn: ctpopcorn.com
Cinema Therapy is:
Written by: Megan Seawright, Jonathan Decker, and Alan Seawright
Produced by: Jonathan Decker, Megan Seawright, Alan Seawright, and Corinne Demyanovich
Edited by: Jenna Schaelling
Director of Photography: Bradley Olsen
English Transcription by: Anna Preis
Connect with us!
Website: www.thecinematherapy.com
Discord: / discord
Instagram: / therapy_cinema
TikTok: / therapy_cinema
Twitter: / therapy_cinema
Facebook: / therapycinema - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
![🔴 [TRỰC TIẾP] Tứ Xuyên (Trung Quốc) VS U20 Thái Lan | Cúp VTV9 - Bình Điền 2024 | JET STUDIO](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bguJ41PcW0c/mqdefault.jpg)
The movie’s relationship ❌
:
The movie’s aesthetic ✅
the carriage and graveyard scene is
🤌
@@sgr1888 fr
@@sgr1888 the graveyard makes me cry every time. Wishing You Were Somehow Here Again is heartbreaking, but so pretty.
If you want to see the story with GOOD singing, watch the 25th anniversary recording
@@pocahontasgirl1 First time I went to see this musical it was three months after my dad died. I didn't know much about it, my Dad was the one who wanted to go. The tickets had been for both of us to go together. That song started up and I lost it in the theater and just fell apart completely. I still can't hear that song without tearing up.
Because of watching CinemaTherapy, the phrase "Staying means nothing if you don't have the option to leave." Has entered my consciousness and I have said it to several people in bad situations.
She could've left if giving the Phantom a chance. Not talking about all crushes though.
Why did I read this in Gollum’s voice.
That's awesome
YES. This -- exactly this -- is what bothered me growing up in evangelical circles. Divorce was touted as some horrible evil, like you ruined your life/family/etc. When in reality, the possibility of divorce--the fact that it's always an option for partners... it gives the commitment meaning. Forbidding it and putting social pressures on staying takes away from the depth of the couple's bond and choice to stay.
AND YOU'RE ALWAYS FREE TO BEGIN AGAIN AND YOU'RE ALWAYS FREE TO BELIEVE~~~~
WHEN YOU FIND THE PLACE WHERE YOUR HEART BELONGS YOU'LL NE~~~~ VER LEAVE~~~
Did someone get the reference?
One of the biggest points that wasn't pointed out but that was really notable for me was how Raoul gaslit Christine for so long telling her the phantom didn't exist when she KNEW he was real, and then used her as bait to catch him during the musical later even though she's scared and doesn't want to do it. Phantom is toxic, but don't put Raoul on a pedestal either😂
exactly.
I agreed. Raul is abusive too.
@@taniascheiddeoliveira1914 Depends on who plays him. Also it is RAOUL. But he didn't gaslight Christine.He was simply a voice of reason.He has his flaws.If anyone is gaslighting Christine, it's the Phantom.
The Phantom is believed to be a legend in the opera house. Not a lot of people believe he exists, including Raoul. It's until he appears at the masquerade that Raoul soon believes Christine since there's now proof that the Phantom exists and is a real person. And then Raoul uses Christine as bait to capture him. Although Christine was scared, he tries his best to soothe her worries. And he was using her as bait for the sake of other people not getting hurt and killed.
@KitsuneMoon Agreed. Raoul ,to me, seems like a practical person who doesn't believe in ghost stories and which is exactly how Christine is describing the phantom on the rooftop while he certainly admits a man is behind all this , he doesn’t believe it's a ghost which is what he's trying to tell Christine-Ghosts don't kill people, people kill people.
And even when he uses her as a bait, to me it seems like he wants to ensure her long-term safety by putting her through a little danger and to ensure her future safety. And what else they could've done besides this which wouldn't put everyone in danger? Die?
I love that you pointed out that she's more afraid of his anger than any physical deformity. Other versions and the book make so much more of his face than any other character flaw
The original book makes so much more of his intellect and intense violence that make him a bad dude, not his disfigured face.
Well the book doesn't focus on a single defect because the Phantom has many problems. His violence is explained but it isn't excused.
His facial scars are also explained, but the way the Phantom addressed them was not by overcoming his trouble, but rather to wear a mask and hide in the sewers.
I also think the point of the original work was not even a character analysis of the Phantom, but a criticism of theater and what essentially was "Hollywood culture" of the 1800s.
I think even at one point in the movie she says “it’s in your soul where the true distortion lies”
@@isabelledeal1338yeah the book version is an abusive, serial murdering lunatic, and that is not the guy Gerry B was playing for the movie
@@liamroberson440I think Butler is still playing an abusive serial murdering lunatic, but the focus is more on the charisma and manipulation than the latter and we get more sympathy for him so it’s hard to see him as just a murderer.
In the original book, Raul is actually incredibly toxic. Christine doesn't recognize him at first, but he still feels that he's owed her affection because of their history. He exhibits several stalker habits, including breaking into her dressing room and getting really mad when she rejects him initially. I wish they showed this in the musicals and movie to show just how bad both of Christine's options are.
Which is like book readers dont like neither erik or raoul. Seriously i read the book when i was 10~11, i didn't like raoul or erik and wished the persian or madame giry would just adopt christine and flee paris.
@@msk-qp6fn so true i shipped christine with therapy to help her deal with her dads death. actually i shipped everyone with therapy
I kinda get why they changed it. It's easier to show how problematic the Phantom's behaviour is if you can compare it to a healthy romantic interest. If both are bad then the message gets a bit muddy.
@@CroobieLetter even in the movie his attitude wasn’t that great. He constantly ignored her thoughts and worries, he basically didn’t give her a choice either. He’s like, “if you love me I’ll keep you safe, you’re being paranoid for no reason.
@AmyGallo I know, right? She saw Raoul at a great distance, recognized, and smiled over him instantly. He, however, walked within three inches of her, and he didn't notice she was right there. He didn't recognize her at all, until she was prettied up onstage, like a woman of his social class would be. (10/25/2022)
The phrase that resonated with me the most out of this whole episode was "A lot of times the monsters that we're scared of are the ones that we create by our lack of compassion".
It's an incredibly thoughtful view, full of empathy and responsibility.
That is entirely the point of the book, too. Because he had all this talent and *capacity* to be a great person but was utterly ruined by society's abuse of him and then he in turn perpetuated the cycle in abusing others. Just... not bullying people solves so many problems.
God yeah, it’s also why I am so attached to the character of The Phantom tbh. Like, while I didn’t end up like him (fiction is a fun house reflection of reality), I can certainly see ways in my past that could’ve turned such. Hell I still cry like a baby at his fate, especially if I’m listening to the 25th anniversary soundtrack! It’s so good. Stab me in the heart more, ALW!
@@blissinchains
That phrase Made me think about bullying... Is sad. (Sorry if I have gramatical mistakes, English is not my native language)
Agree 100%
I watched this when I was younger, and I remember thinking and asking my mom "wait, why's she kissing him?" When Christine kissed the phantom. I was a confused little child. I think my mom explained it as an apology. I think her word were "she's saying I love your music, but not you." Doesn't really hit the nail on the head, but it made sense to like, six year old me.
Your mum is a genious!
So, uh... funny story: you know how kids sometimes have that one movie they watch over and over a thousand times? This was that movie for me
Picking up plot as a small autistic child is hard, especially when there's enough visual detail to process for literal days and the nature of singing means I'm going to mishear key parts of dialogue. The intricacies of picking up on multiple aspects of body language and stringing them together into a single coherent impression is still mostly beyond me now, so as a younger version of myself I was even more clueless.
... and I didn't realize that the phantom wasn't canonically a literal angel until I was a teenager. I also picked up on zero of the creep factor until around then and didn't realize how big the age gap was until I saw this video about a decade after all my other realizations occurred. I also didn't quite get why she wanted to be with Raoul as a kid when the phantom seemed to be a much more interesting person to me
Basically what I'm trying to say is that I took in all the information this film puts out backwards and now I'm an adult who unironically reads Kylo Ren fanfiction 🤣
@@madeliner1682 Actually, it makes perfect sense.
Most kids are not supposed to pick up on the "adult" jokes in Disneyfilms. So, well done, you were watching the way people your age watch movies (at that time anyway.)
And, yes, this film is inconsistent and confusing. Motivations are quite muddled all around. (And I agree, even though the phantom is not a very nice guy, he is definitely the most interesting one around!)
Also... I think you may be one of the "real" watchers. Acting is fun, but also still fake.
(Like some people will forever see through the illusions of a magician, because they will not let themselves be distracted, so the sleight of hands *does* get noticed. People with Downs syndrome are famous/feared for it!)
I (autistic) absolutely dislike romantic movies, because well.. they are (obviously) faking it!
(There are a few "good ones" out there, and suprisingly...they are the ones in which the characters&actors actually fancied each other romantically at that time! Or really liked each other as people and got along great as well as "playing the part of...")
Bodylanguage itself is hard enough without people telling you "yes, you see one thing, but your are supposed to ignore that and believe something else entirely".
That is why films etc. usually are not helping anyone actually learning to read bodylanguage and its meanings.
(If anything they teach you to fall for the fakers?)
Sorry, I do not know this Kylo Ren. But if it makes you happy...go for it!
Maybe write some of your own as well?
(Your comment had a nice flow to it, so you probably have a talent?)
@@madeliner1682 The phantom is a really interesting person... I wish I could find a man like him but men like him don't exist....😂😂😂
@@muurrarium9460 interesting point.
I guess part of why I usually don't have an emotional read on almost any movies is because my parents would tell me verbally how I was supposed to feel about it and they were never right, so now I just kinda get this gray wash of "eh, how the fuck am *I* supposed to know?"
Which is another factor in why I like Kylo Ren so much, because The Last Jedi was the movie that finally got the message across to me that people do things for reasons. That realization also happened at an embarrassingly late age, and in my defense the way people behave can still seem a little nonsensical even now, but it helped a lot and its effect on my world view still has aftershocks today
I think it’s important to note that for most of the story the Phantom loves Christine’s VOICE and not her person. At least at first. When she kisses him at the end, THAT is when his love turns to actually loving HER. Not lustfully but because of the expression of care. And that’s why he’s able to let her go finally at the end. It’s also why he says “It’s over now, the music of the night.” That is a deeper abandonment of his previously held ideals than people realize.
Ooh, I like that! Yeah, he kind of sees her like a music box!
In the book, Erik isn't interested in sex at all, his view of a wife is someone who he can dress pretty and take to walks with. It's basically a child's view of what marriage is like before he learns about sexuality and procreation as he grows up.
@@lmahu6627 Man, I didn’t remember that even being mentioned in the book! I’ll have to take another look!
This reminds me of one post I saw where someone redrew a scene from The Swan Princess movie with Christine saying “Is my voice all that matters to you?” and The Phantom replies “What else is there?”
@lmahu6627 omg finally someone clears that up 😂 😭 I felt like it was so weird that that wasn’t how the story went but then BAM there you have it
I remember when I first watched this as a teenager and I was so upset that Christine and Phantom didn't end up together. Now as an adult I rewatched it and realized what the movie was trying to do and all of the messages it was trying to get across. Definitely can't blame Christine since me too as a teenager thought Phantom was dreamy
Technically Erik was too tortured to be a partner, so I accept Christine's choice. He was abused for so long wouldn't really know how to be in a healthy relationship. I like them as friends.
Meanwhile Love Never Dies said SCREW IT 😅
Not to mention the phantom murdered two innocent people.
That's why I don't understand why people see as canon that so called "sequel" where they make Christine and the Phantom ship actually happen.
"Is so romantic!", no, is so problematic....
Yeah, I loved this when I was a teen. I remember telling people she was boring for not choosing Phantom. To be fair, the flashback is what made me sympathize with him. I also just didn't like Raoul. He was just money in a nice suit which doesn't appeal to me.
This just reminds me of the time I was talking about the musical with a woman who began ranting about how cold and cruel Christine was in rejecting Phantom. I looked at her and said, "But he KILLED PEOPLE." She paused in her rant, tilted her head thoughtfully, and then very softly said, "Oh yeh. There's that."
But Christine was certainly cold and cruel. Christine didn't deserve his love! Who with a kind and compassionate heart, would walk up and take a prosthesis off someone's face without asking first? Then run to another guy and tell him how horrid that face was! Hmm... She betrayed him every time! Honestly, I hate traitors. I don't like how she humiliated him in front of the whole audience. She took off his mask for the second time and really knew how he would react to this. And what happened, he got angry again. Yes, he killed people, but he did it because he experienced violence and cruelty as a child. Society's behavior and isolation made him that way, but he wasn't really evil. Soldiers also kill people, but no one condemns them.... I even think the Phantom was a romantic soul. Also, he was very gentlemanly considering he had no social skills! So I bet most people would have done the same thing if they were in his place....Maybe even worse.... As for the viscount, who wouldn't choose the perfect prince? It was quite predictable that they would be a couple. She clearly wanted to become a countess, because she chose money over genius. I think Christine is a typical gold digger like most females. 😆 The same fate befell Heathcliff. (Wuthering Heights ) The Phantom and Heathcliff are a lot alike as well as the romances they had with their loves, both girls chose rich men.
And the Phantom isn't a psychopath! He's just madly in love... People do crazy things, when they're in love. In fact, if he was really obsessed he wouldn't have let her and Raoul go.
@@gr-wg2nn If you don't feel compassion for him, then you are heartless.. 😅
plus he basically groomed her ??
If you think this is healthy love, please consider getting help.
@@ingridmay66 compassion? Yes.
But accepting anything and everything without critical feedback is not the right response to that.
A revelation in my brain was that Christine creaved a fatherfigure and Erik craved a motherfigure. I feel like it might even be designed with that thought, since Erik also kind of raised Christine liek a fatherly person but as a grown woman for his subnconcious she fit the role of mother because of her compassion. The Phantom desperately clinged to her as he couldn't cling to his own mother and Christine has a hard time letting go of him because he was there for her when her father couldn't.
This comment is so sigmund freud lol
👍 brilliant comment❤️
Bro has psycho-sexual issues
I am stunned. Because you described it so well and that really kind of fits. No wonder they had such a powerful effect on each other: that gave the other something they really needed.
I also think not enough people remember that the Phantom of the Opera from the original book was a Universal horror movie monster for a reason. This is a horror story. Part of Christine's terror is knowing that if and when he comes for her, she'll go, whether she really wants to or not. This is not a YA romantic triangle where both options are appealing, she wants to be with Raoul but knows from experience that she can't escape. "Can I betray the man who once inspired my voice? Will I become his prey? Do I have any choice?" And playing that up is *So much more fun*
The silent film is really great if people want to see another version. I think I this film does borrow some of it visually.
I think that’s a totally valid point, and a lot of people do forget that, but I also don’t want anyone to not know that the book is still very much ultimately about the the phantom learning the meaning of love/compassion. The phantom may be more of a monster in the book, but the complexity is still there. The madame Giry equivalent character in the book narrates the final chapters and asks the reader whether we should feel compassion for him, concluding that yes, we should, ending the book with something along the lines of, “Here was a man with a mind and heart that could have held the world, yet he had to content himself with a cellar, just because the he was ugly” (paraphrasing from memory).
I CLAPPED when Alan made the point about the Phantom needing to be a musical (vocal) genius. I always hear the argument about great actors who are maybe mediocre singers being cast in movies: "Oh, but the characters are not supposed to be professional singers, so it's fine." First off, that's not how musicals work- but if ever there was a character who is supposed to be a great singer, it's Phantom!
Don't listen to these therapists because they are liars and jokers. 😆😆😆
The Phantom is a composer. Why do you think he needed Christine's special voice?She was his muse and inspiration. Also, in the old movies the phantom didn't sing a single note. Yes, he can sing, but he is not a super singer. His last words say a lot, when Christine left him: "You alone can make my song take flight, it's over now - the music of the night!!!!" So, he realizes that there is no one to make music for...His prima donna ran off with someone else...
Yes, on Broadway the singers must be professional because it is a concert.
The Phantom (in all versions) is a reworking of Svengali but with different paranormal elements.
His voice has mystical control and is such a gift he seems heaven-sent when singing.
Mr. Butler is hot and tries hard. No one would hear his voice and believe he is an angel.
True. But this isn't the book or other movies. This is a movie version of a 'Broadway' musical. The part of the Phantom is just as hard and technical as Christine's.
Could you imagine this having been cast with Hugh Jackman though. That man has pipes.
@@MakoKitten I can't imagine Hugh Jackman as the Phantom. Yes, he can sing, but his voice is soft and sounds almost like Patrick Wilson. Butler is a more interesting choice because he sounds like a tormented man.👌😅
Out of the multiple versions i've seen of this musical, one had the Phantom physically pause and react to Raoul's line "Why make her lie to you to save me?" and I thought that was such an amazing touch to see him start to realize he's in the wrong at that point and it eases him into the change of heart at the end. I loved it
In the 25th Anniversary version the camera makes a point to capture Ramin's Phantom's reaction, plus the reaction to "the tears I might have shed for your dark fate/grow cold and turn to tears of hate" of sheer heartbreak and realisation
@@zarayoung3781 Ramin’s performance kills me so much in that. Like there’s only so much he can do with his face because of the makeup, but his hands are doing EVERYTHING the ENTIRE TIME and I love it SO. MUCH!
I've never seen any version of this play/movie in its entirety.
I have only a rough idea of the general story, thanks to comedy riffs on the plot.
@@MonkeyJedi99 This version of the movie is on TH-cam and it's free to watch (last I checked)!
@@zettagotbored9341 I liked that they got Ramin to play Christine's father in this movie.
Unpopular opinion:
Whatever I do, I just can't get myself to like Raoul. I feel like in a strange way, he's just as controlling as the phantom except he disguises it. He's always telling her that he'll follow her wherever she wants to go, but also kind of assumes that she will choose him and doesn't respect her boundaries either. My grandfather always used to say that actions speak more than words and that's how I see it. He tells her what she wishes to hear from the phantom, but expects her to be with him in return. I believe Christine just needs to grab her dancer gal-palls and go on a girl trip to reassess her life choices bc neither of these men are good news.
Maybe that's just me.
The only Raoul I truly root for is Hadley Fraser in the 25th anniversary performance. Just something about the performance really makes the character genuinely likeable.
@@kirstypollett2544 I agree slightly, but Ramin Karimloo killed that performance. I got to see him sing Music of the Night live at one of his concerts. Hauntingly beautiful.
I always thought the reason why in the movie Raoul seems controlling too is because of the age difference between the actors. Wilson and Butler were both in their 30s in comparison to their leading lady who was 17. If they cast a younger Raoul and older Christine so that they’d be closer in age, they would seem much more balanced as a couple on screen.
Honestly, the musical version of Raoul is tame compared to OG book Raoul. He lashed out at Christine whenever she didn't return his affection for her. Stalked and hid in her dressing room and stalked her at the inn after she visited her father's grave. At the masquerade ball, he tries to go after Erik but Christine pulls him away warning him but Raoul again berates Christine and she leaves in tears. And then right after that, he gets jealous because Christine is saying "Poor Erik" and feels upset she didn't say "Poor Raoul". He's much more entitled in the book.
He gets pretty pressed whenever Christine wasn't the idealized version that he had in his mind. The two just suck as romantic leads and I wish Christine didn't get with him either. The best Raoul is the one from the 1962 movie, he's charming, sincere and respects Christine's boundaries.
I also can't seem to like Raoul. He's slightly better than the phantom in loving Christine, but it seems they're stuck in this childhood fantasy. Both Raoul and the phantom are jealous and possessive.
It's obvious with the phantom because his mask slips when she rips it off. Raoul doesn't have this happen in as obvious a way, but you can clearly see it when she doesn't want to play the phantom's opera because she knows, whatever it is he will do, he will get to her and it will most likely kill someone. Raoul insists it's the only way, seemingly disregarding the phantom knows everything so is fully aware of the traps. She wants to leave because he will follow her, but with no one around only she can be harmed.
It’s shocking to me how they didn’t talk about the fact the phantom followed her to her fathers grave and willingly acted like her fathers angel to try to get her to go with him. Raoul literally told her that this man is not her father knowing his intentions. Imagine what could’ve happened if Christine actually had followed him in. 😰
You are overreacting... In the graveyard scene, he did not pretend to be her father... He admitted that he is her "angel of music". Raoul is an idiot! Nothing would have happened to her if Christine had actually followed him in. And she (at least) would have been able to talk to him normally. She was dear to him, so his actions were not with malicious intentions.
@@ingridmay66 didn’t phantom literally say “too long you wondered in winter, far from my FATHERING gaze.” And I imagine if Christine did go with phantom we wouldn’t have seen her outside ever again
@@jackisbby9794 But he said -" Have you forgotten your angel?
Christine: Angel, oh speak
What endless longings
Echo in this whisper?............ Angel of music!
I denied you... (you denied me)
Turning from true beauty
Angel of music!
My protector... (do not shun me)
Come to me, strange angel... (come to your strange angel). They call each other the angels of music. So she really knew who she was talking to... Also, she was not afraid of him at all because she went to the cemetery alone. I don't agree with the fact that he won't let her out... If she goes with him out of love and of her own free will, then everything would be fine. The musical prevents them form having any real dialogue at all until the very end. I wish the writers would have added, amongst the other stuff they added, is more bonding time with the phantom and Christine because with so little time spent together on screen we hardly get to know them as a potential couple. Communication is key in any relationship, good or bad, and when she made it clear that she didn't like the things he'd done, you can see him appear stricken, sad and then ultimately when he's shown tangible proof of love and how it feels, he commits a selfless act in letting her go. His past excuses nothing - but it informs us of why he knows no better. However, he bears a capacity to adapt and change. He is a genius, a very intelligent man.
@@ingridmay66 I agree but still it was kinda weird seeing how vulnerable she was and him taking advantage of that by making her believe he was good for her and manipulating her into coming with him. Tho I’d like an alternative story where Christine actually falls in love with him and they live their lives..not like love never dies tho…
@@ingridmay66 I agree lmao would love to see raoul and erik raise Gustave like two and a half men spin-off
This story just cements in my head the term "Hurt people hurt people" while adding the caveat "Loved people love people"
With the extra extra caveat that "Loved people hurt people" and "hurt people can love people"
Sometimes hurt people love people because they don't want others to suffer the same pain they know
I can see that
He let her go because he didn't want her to live the way he lived. It is clear that he realized his mistakes.
@@CazuhLynn When one is put on display as a sideshow freak and sexually abused by their jailer... it hardly promotes a healthy view of humanity. Sorry.
Christine realizing he's not the Angel of Music when he shows his anger/violence always spoke to me because I didn't realize I was in an emotionally abusive relationship until he blew up like that and actually physically hurt me (shoved me down and slammed my foot in the door). The physical violence made me realize what I had been putting up with, and that none of it was OK.
Well that's physical abuse you described, not emotional abuse. I absolutely get that though, I went through something similar, but it was purely emotional abuse and manipulation since it was a very young lesbian relationship. (we were like 13, but abuse can happen at any age and no I'm not exaggerating.) I won't go into details unless someone asks, but yeah
@@Evielicious what ann was saying is that she didn't know she was being abused until the abuse changed from emotional to physical. not that being hit was emotional abuse.
@@Evielicious I'm not trying to invalidate your experience, but if the person you were with was 13 years old, then that's a child. Children can certainly bully and exhibit abusive speech and behaviors, but they are not "abusers" in the same sense that adults are and it's not a good idea to "adultify" them. Children simply don't have the same capacity or responsibility for abuse. However, it sounds like the experience deeply negatively affected you, that pain is real, so I hope you're getting help for that.
@@GoddoDoggo okay, what? She knew exactly what she was doing. She was manipulative abusive, doing the exact same things that people have told me is abuse. She told me she was suicidal and that it was my fault, she reminded me every day about how I was worth nothing compared to her, and that I needed her to feel validated. She was 13 yes, and so was I. But she absolutely was abusive. I've had to have years of therapy to realize that thing experience was unfair to me, and that I don't deserve to be treated that way like I thought I did. After we broke up I received threats from her and her family, saying I would get arrested or hurt if I said anything on what happened. (arrested for "cyber bullying" her mother said.) Even to this day she terrifies me. I can't believe you would assume the severity of a situation you know nothing about before hand, and just say it was just "children being mean". Even now I hear stories from people who know her, us now being almost adults. Horror stories about her behavior, about her being narcissistic, manipulative, and a seething ball of rage that destroys everything in her path. I'm almost 17, and that experience (I was with her for five years, and towards the end of it I thought I was so worthless I nearly ended my life) is something I am still recovering from and trying to bounce back from fully. It's difficult, because I was at a very important age of shaping who I was. She hurt my development as a person. This is in fact, emotional abuse. "I'm suicidal, and it's because of you". Something I heard over and over again, something I believed full heartedly. I believed I was killing her, I believed that if she came up dead it would be my fault, and I thought that made me a worthless person who's entire purpose is fixing her so that way I rectified my mistake. That's what she taught me to believe for five. Years. She's still like this to this day, and her age does not make it any less abuse. My age does not make this any less abusive. Abuse is abuse regardless of who it's from. And by now, she's plenty old enough to be conscious of her decisions. She's been the exact same ever since, if she wasn't allowed to be called an abuser at 13/14, what age does she suddenly become one? Is it like on her 18th birthday she is "certified"? She's always been like this. Your logic makes 0 sense.
@@GoddoDoggo Yeah this is just a bad take. Abuse doesn't require an abuser recognize their behaviour is abusive. Infantilizing preteens and teens and saying that somehow their peer-to-peer interactions which, mind you, can be very formative and foundational for their understanding and preconceptions about how those kinds of relationships work/what is/isn't okay socially etc, can't be abusive because they're too inexperienced to understand that their behaviour embodies abuse is like saying that a kid can't be a murderer because they were too young to fully understand the significance of taking a life when they shot up a school. Surely you see how insane that logic is-- It's no different in the case of abuse.
I loved this movie when I was like 14. I really wanted Phantom to be with Christine, but I left it for a few years and re-watched it recently and all I could see was how afraid Christine must have been.
It's amazing the difference some growth can make.
I still want them to be together. For me, they are the most beautiful duet in tv history.😅
To me, the Phantom is not really loving Christine as a person, but a piece of his own lifeless artwork. He wants her to be with him, to be on the stage, and in return to love him, but he often ignores or manipulates Christine's feelings and thoughts. His controlling behaviors (which is stronger on the stage than in the movie) are a true threat. Yet, from the lyrics, we see a deeply traumatized child who just wants to be treated with kindness, who has perhaps been rejected so often that he learned to get what he wants by threatening people. It's sad, but unless the Phantom is willing to change, just like the Beast is willing to change for Belle, Christine will not be happy if she chooses the Phantom.
@@HingYok Why wouldn't she be happy with him? He was kind to her. And he loved her so much!!!! If he hadn't shown her his beloved doll (her in the wedding dress), I do think she'd have slept with him (after the music of the night). 😂😂 Well, Dude is lonely since his birth. I don't think he really knows how to handle with girls (why did she faint? She was so weak 😆)....After the song she had to kiss him... Poor Phantom, a rookie mistake ruined it for him..
...
@@ingridmay66 Because the Phantom has this "do-as-I tell-you-or-else" thing to everyone, even to Christine in the stage version ("You will sing for me!" instead of "you belong to me!" in the masquerade). He might seem nice to her, but it's not like he cares if she's happy. Not a scene in the stage or the movie version has shown that he cares about Christine's feeling. Maybe Christine's kiss has changed him at the end, but it's too late.
I never really liked Raoul OR Phantom, but I was able to understand the Phantom's inability to let go of his pedestal vision of Christine. Understand but not approve of, of course.
Honestly, the more I grow up, the more I sympathize with the stage hands and the theater owners than any of the main characters, lol!
I ALWAYS laugh when the horse appears in the tunnels and Christine rides it for like 10 seconds 😂
"I gave you my music and this is how you repay me" is exactly the 'entitled nice guy' trope. He was nice to her (by giving her music, of his own volition) and therefore she owes him a relationship.
Playing devil's advocate, his music is him. Him saying this is the equivalent of a woman saying "I gave you my soul and you turn around and cheat on me." Totally not saying he's in the right.
@@daniellerapozo5777 you're pretty much on the money. Not that it isn't a toxic trait, but he's saying he feels cheated on, that he's committed himself to her and is hurt by her not doing the same... that is very different from someone saying "i bought you a dinner, take off your clothes"
@@daniellerapozo5777 No it's not, it's not the same thing at all, because she was not in a relationship with the Phantom, he just really wanted her to be. I guess it's the equivalent of a woman stalking a man since his childhood and devoting all her time and energy to him and then screaming that he's "cheating on her" when he finds an age-appropriate girlfriend.
@@NoESanity You're literally describing a Nice Guy, though. A Nice Guy "commits" himself to a girl who only wants to be friends with him, and when she gets a boyfriend she's actually attracted to, the Nice Guy flips out and screams that "I was your shoulder to cry on! I spent so much time and effort on you! And now you friendzone me?!"
You guys are so desperately trying to make the Phantom seem morally superior, but now he looks even more like a Nice Guy.
Oh give it up. He was abused, enslaved, made to kill people in Persia to not be murderd himself… at what point exactly between that and his mother abandoning him gave him a chance to learn about healthy relationships? Oh, right. None.
The part that really starts to break the phantom comes right before Raúl arrives when Christine sings
“This haunted face holds no horror for me now ...
It's in your *soul* that the true distortion lies ...”
And Emmy Rossum’s delivery still gives me chills
I can hear that line in my mind reading this. She delivers it so perfectly!!!
always loved that part as well, especially as it shows that true horrors come from actions and not appearances.
I didn't know that's what the line was, helps. Thank you
The relationships in the book are even more problematic.
Also now you've said it Hugh Jackman as the Phantom is something strikes me as a real missed opportunity I wish I could see.
No way, Hugh Jackman was in "Les Misérables." And his voice is too soft for the Phantom. Gerard's roughness suits the tormented character very well.
@@ingridmay66 YES EXACTLY, Gerard's tone of voice so perfectly suits the character of the Phantom, i couldn't even describe how, but you did it for me
Interesting. In what way do you think they are more problematic in the book than in this grooming-filled film?
That one note when he screeches the "pit as dark as HEeeEEeElL!!!!" (Shudder)
@@welbeckmanor2554 Have you read the book? In the book the Phantom is much more psychotic. He forces Christine to choose between him and the entire opera house. At that same time, he puts Raoul in a torture chamber. In the book, Raoul does believe in her more quickly and there’s a little less gaslighting, but there’s a lot of jealousy between him and the Phantom.
This is the movie I have always been obsessed since a child. And as a child I was mad at Christine for not choosing the Phantom. For me what he did (grooming and controlling her) wasn't clicking, nor were the words of the songs. I remember it was around high school, when I was doing one of my annual rewatch of the movie that everything started to click. It clicked that the Phantom preyed on a vulnerable, grieving child, that what he felt wasn't love. It also clicked that the song "Point of no Return" was of technically lust and s*x
I think he helped the girl get over the loss of her father. She was an orphan and he was an outcast, this brought them closer.... He taught her to sing.... And everything was fine until the viscount appeared. The phantom loved her very much and made it clear in the end. Unfortunately, Christine didn't love him at all... And, probably, she was very disappointed to find out that her "angel of music" is just a deformed, sad, lonely person.
@@ingridmay66 I think she did love Erik, she just wanted her rich hansome childhood boyfriend Raoul
@@priestessmikokikyo77 Raoul was an idiot! If Raoul truly loved her, he wouldn't have used her as bait to try and kill the Phantom.I prefer the Phantom and he was so devoted to her. But I don't feel her love for him... She doesn't even try to comfort him or hug him when he cries…. She just stares at him and thinks what will happen now... Her indifference and coldness irritate me. The Phantom looked at her when she returned and there was hope she would stay with him. Only to end up that she gives him the ring. The ring that was supposed to, from the phantom's point of view, symbolize their love. I would call that the final insult rather than love or compassion.
@@ingridmay66 I still love Erik and Christine together. he deeply loved her yes christine "used" erik to get whatever she wanted. She abandoned him and that is just unspeakable. Raoul i cant stand him in any version of Phantom
@@priestessmikokikyo77 The viscount is the perfect prince with the perfect life. And he can get any girl. But the phantom's life was so sad and hard... He suffered at the hands of a freak show whilst Raoul lived in a mansion with everything. I would like to see Raoul in the phantom's place. I bet he wouldn't be so kind... He probably would have done the same as the Phantom. In this version, the phantom could find another love, better than Christine, and be happy at last..... It's a pity they didn't show what happened to him after the final lair.
Fun fact: In the Novel The Phantom of the Opera, Erik is described as corpse-like and is referred to as having a "death's-head" (human skull) throughout the story. He has no nose, and his eyes are sunken so deep in his skull that all that is seen are two eye sockets, except when his yellow eyes glow in the dark. His skin is yellowed and tightly stretched across his bones, and only a few wisps of dark brown hair are behind his ears and on his forehead.
His mouth is never described in as much detail, but is referred to as a “dead mouth” by Christine, and Erik acknowledges that his mouth is abnormal when lifting up his mask to display ventriloquism. He is described as extremely thin, so much so that he resembles a skeleton. Christine graphically describes his cold, bony hands, which also either feel or smell like death. There is debate among both English and French speakers as to whether the original French word used here, sentir, was intended by Leroux to mean "smells like" or "feels like,” as the French word is used for both feel and smell depending on the context.
Erik woefully describes himself to Christine as a corpse who is "built up with death from head to foot." According to the Persian, Erik was born with this deformity and was exhibited as le mort vivant in freak shows earlier in his life. Erik sometimes plays up his macabre appearance, such as sleeping in a coffin as if he is a vampire, he also costumes as the titular character from Edgar Allan Poe's The Masque of the Red Death for the masked ball.[citation needed]
Lon Chaney's characterization of Erik in the silent film The Phantom of the Opera (1925) remains closest to the book in content, in that Erik's face resembles a skull with an elongated nose slit and protruding, crooked teeth. In this version, Erik is said to have been deformed at birth.
A proper Phantom look. Gerard was too pretty.
@@Edidin The best phantom out there is without a doubt Leonidas Frank "Lon" Chaney.
@@benderbendingrofriguez3300 Yup. No argument from me here.
Also in the book, Erik is far less charming and Raoul is much more noble.
If you haven't read the phantom by Susan Kay. You're missing out on amazing look into his character. His look is held true to the original story. The book just expanded on his whole life.
“There’s a difference between ‘my story is sad’ and ‘now I get to be awful’”. I have noticed that there are a lot of characters in drama that have this problem, and even people in real life that have this problem.
Art & Life imitating each other
catra..
This is why Ramin Karimloo will forever be the most amazing Phantom to ever grace the screen or stage. Man has the range needed to play The Phantom and you feel like you're ascending when he hits the money notes
Yeap, Ramin will forever be the most amazing Phantom on Broadway, but Gerard Butler will forever be the most amazing Phantom in the movie..... 😅
For screeen - absolutely, Ramin is the best, along with his Christine Sierra. For stage in general it should be more good quality records to compare. I heard many good things about other Phantoms, starting with Colm Wilkinson, Ramin's favourite. (I'm not talking about Michael Crawford because wasn't impressed by videos with him on youtube at all, not by voice, not by acting).
YES
And the emotion he puts into every song and scene is so moving. You feel his pain and sorrow. You’re scared when he becomes enraged. You feel sympathy when he’s pouring his soul out to Christine. He’s one of my favorite phantoms.
Like truly, you need a phantom who can give a raw human performance but at the same time he’s the angel of music who taught a child how to sing opera. He’s gotta have unreal pipes. Ramin is that phantom.
In the book (written by Gaston Laroux) we get to know more about his childhood trauma, how even his mother hated him. We also get to know that he was a murderer long before the opera, the chapters about his time in Iran is really disturbing.
Also he died so there was no way if she had a child it would be the phantom's
Hearing this sounds really interesting. What’s the book called?
@@FETVgirl Phantom of the Opera
@@FETVgirl lol
With the final point of "he'd cling to her like a life preserver", it was like that in the book! Erik kept Christine with him for over a month. I forget how long exactly. That was how long it took him to realize she was wilting in his company and the freedom to choose was what was necessary to make her happy.
Yeah, and then later on in the book he still eventually kidnaps her a second time and Raoul and the Persian get stuck in a torture chamber which is mostly focused on mental torture (tree in the middle surrounded with six mirrors that will drive you insane). And then the choice is even way more scary, because in the theater/movie the Phantom says that Christine has to choose between him and Raoul, and if she chooses Raoul Raoul will die. In the book he has a whole bunch of explosives. If she doesn't choose Erik (the Phantom) basically EVERYONE will die and that includes hundreds of people who in that moment are visiting a play at the opera house. Reading the book just makes me laugh at how mild and sweet the Phantom is in the movie/theater. I recently read the book. Book's Phantom is much much more scary.
@@ivankar2866 I was speaking about the aftermath of the final incident, but yes, book Erik is a lot more menacing than movie Erik.
@@janeenschultz8502 I think this might depend on translation, because I've read a couple different translations of this book, and in none of them does he actually keep her for any length of time after the grasshopper/scorpion choice. He pulls the viscount and the Daroga from the torture chamber. Sets them out to dry as it were, and then lets them all leave. He asks her to return to him and bury his body when the newspaper prints that Erik is Dead. The only time she is kept below for any length of time in the two versions I've read is when he takes her below after she performs the first time in Carlotta's place. Book Erik is terrifying I agree. Stage Erik can be too depending on who is playing him. I've seen the stage show a number of different times, and it is always amazing to me how differently the same words/songs hit depending on who is playing the role.
@@briarbramblerose So, I just checked my version of the book and it doesn't say how long she was with him that last time. The Persian was gone and Raoul was chained up. Christine cried over and with Erik, her in pity and him in happiness. Then he let her and Raoul go.
@@janeenschultz8502 book Erik is absolutely terrifying. I've loved the stage show since I first saw it at 14, but I didn't read the book until I was 19 or 20. It really changed my perspective on the show. While I still love it, it lost a lot of the tortured romance vibe appeal it had for me as a kid. As it should have growing up anyway, since he's a deranged killer, not a tortured soul longing for beauty.
I been saying this ever since I saw the movie but I adore Patrick Wilson's Raoul. In the plays Raoul usually has a strong loud voice, which is fine, but Patrick Wilson brings such a gentle earnest quality to his musical lines because his voice is much softer. Their version of "All I Ask of You" genuinely has brought me to tears multiple times because it sounds so sincere and leaves me feeling both warm and full but also incredibly lonely because I can't have it for myself(kind of like the Phantom, go figure xD).
Yes I really love his "All I ask of you" and I agree it is just so comforting and calming though I find Steve Barton's voice even more calming and soothing.
It is like his voice is a warm blanket wrapping around Christine always keeping her safe.
Yes, I love that, too. Raoul soft boi makes just as much dramatic sense, given the specific narrative device his character serves as, if not more so.
@@mysterylovescompany2657 I think if you like Patrick Wilson's gentle Raoul then you would also like the puppy dog Raoul of Michael Shawn Lewis ,totally a soft boy.His is probably the best interpretation of Raoul I've seen.
Completely shielding Christine from the phantom too after just being strangled at even any slightly threatening gesture. It shows that he would 100% die protecting her.
“A lot of the times, the monsters that we’re scared of are the ones we create by our lack of compassion.” That’s a quote to think about.
I love Butler in this film, but Alan nails the problem with him as the Phantom. I will say, though, that 'Past the Point of No Return', especially the crescendo on the bridge, brings chills to my spine. He has this kind of raw, honest tone that's often missing from professional singers that really shines in that song.
He's a very good actor, I think it makes up for the shortcomings of him not being an Operatic singer
I like Butler a lot, but he's in a film with opportunity to get his singing right and do over if needed. On stage, like Ramin, there are no re-dos.
Past the Point of No Return was exquisite and breathtakingly sexy, Butler is perfect and does take my breath away
As a childhood I couldn’t understand why she chose Raul. As an adult I understand. Raul asks to share love with him, show it to everyone, take her with him everywhere. Phantom just wants her to himself. And at the end, by releasing her, he does show real love. UGH god I love this movie so much.
In the book Raoul act like a spoiled brat & is very mean towards Christine I don't like him for Christine & after "Love Never Dies" I don't like Christine with Erik either.
@@catspaw3092 We do not mention LND! Also it's not acknowledged as canon by Leroux's Estate.
As an adult, I don’t get how she chose either. Like specifically We Have All Been Blind kills me with their relationship. Erik did actually want to show her off and shower her constantly with everything that made her happy. What you have to remember is that he was raised as a side show attraction and treated like absolute trash and this was in a time before self help and therapy and everything. She presents the idea of Angel of Music and he only becomes exceptionally controlling after she removed his mask and he then had to worry she would fear his appearance - what had made him the subject of rejection and abuse his entire life. Kidnapping and murder aren’t okay, but if Christine had gotten any amount of actual education and therapy had been a thing it honestly could’ve been pretty okay
@@catspaw3092 yes Raoul did act like a spoiled brat but that was the point of his character to grow out of his childish behaviour and entitlement.It was also his coming of age story.Part of why Raoul behaved like that was because sometimes Christine would tell him to get out of her life and when he would be doing exactly that she would again contact him which made him have trouble controlling his emotions.I think he matures and respects her decision not to marry.Turns his back on Aristocracy and is willing to whisk her away to a safe place and leave her there as she has sworn not to marry.
He also gave up his way of life , his social status and was willing to die to ensure her freedom.But I don't like him in the novel as much .
But I love him in the musical.
And Musical Raoul is not the same character as Book Raoul personality wise.
@@Anne-ny3bz Did I mention he was creeping on Christine too & kept getting pissy because she was not like who he envisioned she should be when they were kids all lovey dovey when the Christine he sees before him is nothing like that? As much as I dislike Raoul they really did him wrong in the sequel musical "Love Never Dies" they paint him as a drunk & gambler they could give him his dignity & kill him off instead leaving Christine alone with a child that was never his & he never found out the truth. My idea is Christine is left with his debts & she has to keep performing to pay them off I soured on Erik because he spent 10 years never getting over Christine & treats those like Madame Giry & her daughter Meg like crap.
I always interpreted the ending a little differently: when Christine chose to stay with the Phantom to save Raoul, Erik saw in her eyes how much she truly loved Raoul. Whether or not he was going to break the trust and to kill Raoul anyway, he realized doing so would only hurt Christine and make her miserable. I think it was that moment for the first time in his life, Erik felt compassion for someone else. Because he once lived miserably, and experienced cruelty against him. Coercing Christine to stay here with him would be repeating what happened to him as a child. And I think that's what finally made Erik break, and he let her go. I wouldn't call it a redemption arc by any means (he did commit murder after all) but it's the closure he needed all these years.
I also loved the contrast between Erik's lair and the rooftop where he watched Christine and Raoul make out. The Phantom's hideout is dark, murky, and cluttered, and it feels almost claustrophobic and hard to breathe in especially with the Phantom's menacing aura. The rooftop, despite the cold and snow, has open air and space allowing Christine to breathe and be vulnerable. I don't think Erik realized it then, but I think after the kiss was when he also realized that Christine needed to be free to be alive, something he never had. Because even with the help of Madame Giry, all he was able to do was move from one cage and live in another.
Your last sentence. Thank you!!
That is some solid literary analysis *nods approvingly*
You nailed it. I always thought the same
The problem is, that she just didn't love the phantom. He still escaped from the theater and started a new life. If she loves him, they could run away together and live somewhere in the village. And it wouldn't be a cage, which means they could both be free.....
There is actually a sequel to Phantom of the Opera called Love Never Dies. It has a very interesting take of what happens after The Phantom of Opera.
When Gerald was informed about that movie, he was sincere to the director and to Andrew Lloyd Webber about his singing abilities. He said 'I sang in a rock band, now that is a opera.. seriously am i really gonna do this?'. His rehearsal was Music of the Night and the point is that they loved him. They said that it is not gonna be easy we are going to do lots of work and exercise but you got this. So to see a actor with not so great singing experience and having the ability to make some steps further the Phantom's character and his singing abilities, for me it is just wow. And i am gonna be honest. The Phantom of the Opera is musical we can enjoy the great opera singers in musical theaters and see their singing talent. Gerald in this movie shows us with his well (after months )working voice the Phantom's emotional rollercoaster in every song. He played so damn well, he knew without hesitation that it may not go well with the singing but he tried so hard and the result was amazing. For me it is double the success because as a viewer i understand now his acting limits. From Phantom to 300 just wow, i do not know so many known well actors who choose to play in musicals. It is a risk.☺️
Thank you for analyzing this movie you were so great!!
My favorite (character) reading of the Phantom is by Lindsay Ellis, in that POTO is not a story of star-crossed lovers separated by society but a coming-of-age story of a child stuck in a 50-year-old man's body and letting Christine go was him "growing up". Since then, I can no longer see Phantom's interactions with Christine as that of a courting lover, but that of a child trying to impress his mother (kiss notwithstanding).
The Phantom wants romantic love but he really needs familial love.
It's worth mentioning that in the book, part of the reason Erik was moved by the kiss was because his own mother never kissed him. Christine showed him the love and care that a mother should have had for her child.
Yeah, I think that part of him just wanted someone who would take care of him and show him the care he never received, as if he were a broken child. He was so nice at the end....
Even though I grew up with this movie, I hadn't made the connection that this is basically be a perfect mirror of my abusive ex, complete with the nearly twice my age, grooming, possessiveness, and controlling behavior. I'm still learning to give myself grace for not seeing the signs, but sometimes the Phantoms out there play the part of Raoul quite convincingly. I'm really grateful that CT made a video on this dynamic. Love isn't supposed to hurt or feel scary. Know that you aren't alone, and that you're far more resilient than you may realize. It's possible to build a peaceful and joyous life and surround yourself with people who want to celebrate your happiness and lift you up. It's never, ever too late to take your life back.
I’m glad you forgave yourself and realized the red flags in this movie.
"The Phantoms out there play the part of Raoul quite convincingly." Beautifully said.
Yeah ik that feeling AND know how it is...without the part of being twice my age. i'm still learning to forgive myself as well, so we're all in this together! (:
24:14 I think Raoul wasn't tearing up because he thought she was being sincere. I think he was heartbroken because he had promised to protect her and she ended up in danger. Raoul didn't even realize the phantom was on the stage with her until she was practically in his arms, and there was nothing he could do without putting her in more danger.
Exactly! That's what I've always got from the scene.I always believed that Raoul always wanted to protect her and that's the reason he even asked her to sing in the first place to ensure her long term safety.
And I've even seen some Raouls immediately running up to the stage preventing the policeman from shooting because Christine is also on stage and could have gotten hurt and then running after her just as the phantom takes Christine away and only held back by the managers.
And I'm really unable to see Raoul as manipulative and controlling and a rich spoiled brat as some people in the comments are saying because to me it always feels like he's doing everything he can to protect Christine though with occassional bad executions.
@@Anne-ny3bz I believe the negative attitudes to Raoul in the other comments are based on the book, apparently in the book he is kind of an entitled controlling asshole, Webber toned it down in the stage and movie versions.
@@animemangalover94 I know I've read the novel and don't like him there.But I see the stage version and book version of Raoul to be different characters as they differ vastly in their personalities and couldn't be more different.
And I believe that in the stage version it really depends on who plays him.
He can be a controlling arsehole if played that way and a lovable and caring person as well when played by another.
And as I've seen very caring Raouls played by many good actors I find it hard to see him as anything but a genuinely caring and selfless person and definitely root for him then. Like John Cudia's Raoul for example.
Patrick Wilson's acting is so good here. Withiut a single word his face conveys so much emotion!
The movie Roaul was so much better than the play or book. The scene of him telling her to do the play in the book and play feels like betrayal. She's so scared, but he dismisses her and just talks about their lives. There's no real empathy. In the movie, the empathy and desire to protect comes through.
The movie took scenes that made him horrible and changed them to make him great and the Phantom weak. I hate the weakness (graveyard scene of WTF?) but love the improvement. In the book, Raoul literally faints. By the time they go to capture Eric, it feels like it's revenge and justice, not love.
For me, I like Phantom because he's a great villain. He's a horrible person but a wonderful villain that you semi root for. Why? Because Raoul sucks. Actually, I root for Christine to say none of the above and Raoul to die. However, I rooted for Raoul in the movie. That says a lot about the positive changes made to the script and character.
Still hate the movie. Lol
I love that you point out the age difference in the actors and actress. In the original book, Christine is also very young, but Erik, the phantom, is even older. He’s old enough to be her grandfather and Raul is much closer in age. Readers also get to see Christine and Raul’s love develop as they explore the opera house.
So I know why Madame Giry didn't speak up!!! The novel has a little bit where she explains herself, it's a little fuzzy but he basically promises her that he'll make her daughter Meg an Empress. She believes him and basically lets him do whatever based on that promise. They don't mention it in the film, I think?
It also wouldn't make sense, in the novel, she doesn't actually know who Erik is, that role goes to the Persian, instead she is more like Christine, sincerely and blindly believing in his "magic".
Never admit you are the one that opened the tigers cage...
My cousin and her groom sang "All I Ask of You" to each other at their wedding. I would have been very cringe if they couldn't pull it off, but they sang it perfectly. I couldn't believe their vocals. It was such a romantic and beautiful moment.
Woooooow!! Wish I could have witnessed it 👏🥹
My mom's name is Christine. She said her and dad were gonna do all i ask of you at least for a dance in their wedding vow renewal, if they do it.
Also mom was a huge Gerard Butler fan she'd start giggling and going "GERARD BUTLER SAID MY NAME."
I've fantasized doing that for my theoretical wedding reception while doing a slow waltz...... and I want essentially the Met Gala for my wedding....everything's planned... now I need to find myself a wonderful man who can sing and is cool with my crazy wedding plans lol
What's wild is that Emmy Rossum has said that she looks back on her performance and singing in this movie and is basically disappointed with herself and thinks she could have done so much better 🤯 what?! This was the first play I ever saw on stage and it was incredible. So this movie definitely has a special place in my heart.
I think she was fantastic, Doug Walker is an idiot. I'm guessing Emmy is a perfectionist.
She's certainly very talented, but also with no control over which take they use, or the instructions from the director.
I remember watching and reading about some of her press about it when she talked about it layer in life. She says her voice was juvenile (she was 18 during filming) and she wishes that she had done better and had a more mature and refined voice.
But overall, absolutely adore her role in this movie. Wouldn't change it for anything.
@@makaylabailor1211 I think a juvenile voice fits the character. I wouldn't change anything either.
She didn't do badly but was very young with an underdeveloped voice for Christine. If she'd done it in her 20s she probably would have been great. They had a similar problem with Butler, he's talented but lacked the training.
I always thought that the lyrics in Phantom clearly portray Raul as the good love interest and Phantom as the bad love interest because of its references of the words "light" and "dark". Phantom's lyrics tell Christine to "turn your face away from the garish light of day. Turn your thoughts away from cold, unfeeling light and listen to the music of the night." and to "open up your mind. Let your fantasies unwind in the darkness that you know you cannot fight." He is the embodiment of darkness and just as he's trying to lure Christine into the darkness, he is trying to lure her into loving him, but that isn't what Christine wants. Christine sings that, "All I want is freedom. A world with no more night." She later sings, "turn my head with talk of summertime." This further mentions her desire to be where she can bask in the light. Meanwhile, Raul sings of light. He sings, "no more talk of darkness... I'm here. Nothing can harm you... Let me be your freedom. Let daylight dry your tears... Let me be your shelter. Let me be your light." In the lyrics of the songs, it shows that Raul is the better love interest because he understands her and wants to give Christine what she wants, not what he wants to force on her. He is the embodiment of the light.
Agreed.Raoul and the phantom are definitely the embodiment of light and darkness. To add to that, Raoul unlike the Phantom never uses her childhood memories against her to call Christine out to him and their first reunion is pretty much the only time he ever mentions it. Christine sticks with Raoul on his own terms. Meanwhile, the phantom always manipulates her childhood memories against her until the very end until it's too late.
Also, a major difference I've noticed is that in "All I ask of you" Raoul wants to lead Christine out of her solitude showing that he cares for her while the phantom wants her to join him in his solitude "Lead me, save me from my solitude" showing that his love is selfish only realising when it's too late.
Just my thoughts!
That is my favorite song and it is the perfect love song too.
In the book she does kiss him. But I think it’s on the cheek or forehead or something. It was the first time he’d felt compassion from another, as even his mother wouldn’t touch him. He did let her go after the kiss, but there was never anything sexual between them.
It's basically what kills him! He's so overwhelmed by that simple act of compassion that he becomes weak and dies within a few weeks or something like that!
Um yes there is love never dies her only child was the phantoms
Yes but they are talking about Gaston Leroux's version
@@Fanrasyfan Love Never Dies isn't canon though. Leroux's estate doesn't even acknowledge it.
@@isobelduncan is there a Leroux's estate? lol
Watching the Phantom break down in the movie when he sends Christine and Raoul away is heartbreaking enough, but then you realise that he's convinced that he'll be alone forever because of his facial deformity. Christine made him feel less alone.
it's so frickin sad like omg stop making me emotional
Alone because of the facial deformity. NOT because he's a murderous psycho...
He's a total incel
I mean, yes, but also to Christine it was never about his face, it was his behaviour. Which interestingly, a lot of incels gripe about, they say they're too ugly to find a date or partner, but the problem is not their looks, it's their toxic views and behaviour that turns people away.
I don't remember ever wanting her to choose the phantom, but I did want him to be able to live his life.
Yep. It definitely was super unhealthy for him to try to get her to love him, but at the same time I still feel really sorry for him since he's clearly got no safe, loving relationships in his life and people always react to him in either fear or disgust and rage. Christine was a safe harbor because she actually treated him with kindness, no wonder he latched on so hard to the idea of loving her and being together forever. It probably felt like getting real food after years of crumbs. Obviously that isn't an excuse to try forcing her hand in marriage and scaring the crap out of her with the crazy behavior either, but I can see why he thought it might work if the opera house let him get away with so much and he was never taught healthy relationship behavior b/c he had literally no safe model to base his love off of.
Really, Christine deserves a healthy loving relationship, Raoul deserves to be served a restraining order and therapy, and Erik deserves to be served a restraining order and therapy AND serious medical care so he has a chance of one day getting his life sorted out and his views healthy enough to actually make a positive, normal relationship with anyone who ISN'T his safe spots like Madame Giry or Christine. But it's a film and a book so what can you do 🤷
Ngl, Emmy Rossum’s delivery of “I gave you my mind blindly” made me want to be a theatre major… Christine is often seen (by the other characters) as a soft spoken, wisp of a waif, but in that moment she is so strong. The “sing argument” Jonathan mentions, she’s strongly arguing with him or trying to persuade him not to harm Raoul, but just saying this line she shows her inner strength-the orphaned girl who put her trust in someone who genuinely betrayed her trust. And this is another Joel Schumacher direction because he said that the entire musical is sung, so being selective with a handful of lines that are not sung make them stand out and mean more.
Yes! I remember that moment and it gave me chills. She instantly redeemed any doubt I had about whether I liked this version with that one line.
You think you loved how Christine was in that one scene, your mind will be blown away by her inner strength in the absolutely amazing novel, "Phantom" by Susan Kay. I HIGHLY recommend this novel if you sincerely love this story and these characters.
@@TronandFlynn82 I am almost to her part I’m just past Joseph bouquet’s death
It's so powerful, and I think one of Christine's most compelling character elements is how deeply she grieves. That alone should turn anyone against the idea of her being with the Phantom. He pretended to be the spirit of the person she loved most in the world, for YEARS. Wishing You Were Somehow Here Again is one of those musical theater songs that will bring me to tears every time.
Meh I always felt emmys performance was lackluster especially compared to a powerhouse like Sierra boggess
Another detail I noticed in the movie was the candelabras (i think that's what they're called). The first time the phantom takes her down to his holy-pneumonia-batmancave, they're all gold and held by golden arms that move the light with her.
After that they're just plain iron, wall-mounted, and there's cobwebs everywhere. Because she could see through the illusion then.
I just finished the book, the original translation from the 1900's. And honestly Raul is JUST as obsessive as the phantom in the book. Multiple times Christine tells Raul to leave her alone, and he doesn't. He hides in her dressing room. He follows her to the graveyard. He listens in at her door. And when she expresses her feelings for the phantom to Raul and how complicated it is Raul just straight up is like, "Well go be with him then!" and throws tantrums. I'm not saying the Phantom has a healthy love by any means. However in the movie, they portray Raul very differently as a protector and an unconditional love for Christine, but in the book, Raul is possessive, obsessive, and toxic. He wouldn't trap her in a dungeon, but he completely disregards her wishes for space and belittles her complicated feelings.
Raoul and Erik are equally toxic, Erik would keep her in his underground lair forever while Raoul would lock her in a gold cage. Being from high society, a marriage with Raoul would force her to leave her life as a professional singer behind and take on the role of Vicomtesse. A life with Erik and a life with Raoul are equally lonely and stunt her growth as a person. The game made by Mazm lets Christine make her own choices when she rejects Erik, either live with Raoul and you see them both living a happy life near the sea, or she decides to not stay with Raoul and discover the world by herself and let herself be who she wants to be. To me, Christine never really had a choice or even have the occasion to wonder what she really wanted because she was stuck between two toxic people who wanted to win her affection and she was forced to choose between these two forced choices.
There is actually a sequel called Love Never Dies that portrays exactly this. Raoul has forced Christine into becoming a perfect noble's wife and made her give up singing. Because he "won" against Erik, he developed a gambling problem that tanked their finances and sets up the plot of the opera as Erik has set up a show on Coney Island and, behind the mask of being the show's owner, offers to pay to have Christine sing there.
@@illyahrthebard3303 ah yes, the phanfiction that got published 😂
Not only that, but the movie is based on Andrew Lloyd Webber’s musical, which in turn is based on the novel.
And, yes, Love Never Dies is a must simply for the fact that it picks up where Phantom leaves off, and shows that Raoul and Christine’s marriage was just as toxic as the possibility of Christine getting with her groomer
I definitely agree. Raoul only helped “save her” because he wanted her to be as drawn to him as she was erik (which wasn’t even attraction more fear with moments of wonder and curiosity but I digress) like the same stalking habits and more child like tantrums when Raoul doesn’t get his way
A thing I love is how in "Point of no return", Christine reveals the Phantom to the audience (tbf, in the stage show that is, where the Phantom wears a cloak and a hood, pretending more convincingly to be Piangi - even Christine only realizes who she is singing a duett with halfway through the song), but not until he uses Raoul's words of love towards her does she go as far as to tear off his mask too. I like to read that as a moment of Christine actually (FINALLY) getting mad at the Phantom for once, seeing his attempts of manipulation for what they are. After all he's done to her, manipulating her, stalking her, threatening her and her loved ones and going as far as murdering people when he doesn't get his way... he now also has the absolute GALL to use Raoul's words as his own, proving not only that he was there, stalking them, when Raoul first said them, but also that he seems to believe that it is mearly sweet words that won Christine over to Raoul and not Raoul showing genuine love to her. The Phantom, so used to manipulating people (including Christine) to get what he wants, can't even seem to imagine Christine to truly be in love with Raoul but mearly being "more successfully" manipulated by him and that using the same words might win her back. Yet by pulling off the mask, Christine proves to him in no uncertain terms that she sees through that this time. And that she won't take it anymore.
I adore that too!!!!
This, just all of this!!
Yeah in the 24th anniversary version they make it much clearer I think that Christine realizes the Phantom was there when Raul and her were plannung to run away and realized he was again stalking her, so that's why she disavows him like that.
After pulling his mask off, she immediately apologizes with her eyes, which the moment of, "why?", from Phantom(Erik), makes a little more heart wrenching. Christine, then at the end, sings the song with Raoul and looks back at Phantom. I hated that moment. I get that Erik was manipulating, but he did love Christine in the end.
@@kaylynnbuente4535 He loved her all his life but manipulated her because he didn't know any other way to get close to her. His situation was terrible and sad.
Say what you will about Gerard Butler’s singing, but when he softly hits that first high note in Music of the Night, and his voice melts into the french horns behind him, that was magical. One of my favorite music moments in film. However, it’s pretty clear that-between acting and singing-Joel wanted to prioritize the former.
What he sometimes lacks in singing, he makes up for in passion and acting. He's still my favorite.
Not to mention that Gerry is f*ing beautiful! XD
@@MsGlamLamb Truth.
He's very good at being demented characters on top of it. His performance in Law Abiding Citizen is superb.
@@MsGlamLamb I think that's probably why people wanted Christine to choose Erik because of Gerard Butler's portrayal of him was so great. I get it if they were, Gerard's performance is mesmerizing. Obviously bad relationship, but Gerard was outstanding in this film.
@@summerrose8110 very true! And the character is very alluring. When it was written (as a romantic character, not the original, from the book), we didn't talk about abusive behavior all that much. Now a days it's a different story.
Gerard Butler is a great singer for a movie. He sounds rugged, vulnerable, and also gives some sex appeal. Doing a movie is completely different than doing a Broadway musical. You have the option to show intimacy and emotions by being able to whisper or softly sing versus belting out notes as you would on stage. I think they all did a fantastic job portraying what they needed to in the movie.
I completely agree with you!!!! I really enjoyed Butler's performance in the movie. Some people don't realize that Broadway is not the same as film. I love when musical movies use somewhat amateur singers. Professionals just seem false to me....Don't get me wrong, I like Ramin, Crawford and the other opera guys, but as Broadway actors, they would not have been brilliant for a movie.
I completely agree! Controversially I feel the opposite in regards to Jackman. Fantastic voice for stage but he has less subtly which I think you need in a movie. 👀
Agreed! The singing in this movie felt "real." Personally I hate the Broadway singing style because like you said it just seems false
Agreed. Hugh Jackman as the phantom would not have been as good, IMO.
No.
Lol sorry I just really think this is a weak excuse. Like I agree with the general point that stage and movie have different requirements and stylizations etc but at the end of the day… I am positive there was someone out there who could act, had the charisma and physical appeal and subtleties, and could also fucking sing. For most roles, I would be more willing to concede some vocal ability in favor of more of anything else required, but it’s really at the top of requirements for this character more than any other I can think of, because it is part of the actual text, acknowledged in-universe in such a way that it impacts the plot, that he had a bewitchingly beautiful voice and impressive (to a bunch of opera house employees!) command of music.
Am I the only person who love Gerard.B singing in the movie? I loved it because it does not sound manufactured, it sounds real and passionate.. Gerald if you see this I am a fan, I think you did excellent!
Same! You're not the only one who loves Gerard's singing. 👏👏👏👏
@@ingridmay66 👍
Agreed
What people neglect to talk about when they dunk on Gerard Butler's singing, is that Andrew Lloyd Webber was involved in the audition process, and ALW was one of the people who chose him *because* he had a rasp to his voice, and because he sounded different from Raoul (who, if I remember correctly, is actually a lyrical tenor [yes, I really loved the making of features].).
Honestly, he's exactly what I expect a guy who's been living underground for 20-ish years to sound like.
@@michaelawiseman7320 The fact ALW was involved means very little, he is not god. But also, not only is the phantom supposed to sound angeli, and know how to sing properly (hence why he can teach her in the first place) but also, one can sound much better without being classically trained, Ramin Karimloo, who would play the part only 4 years later was completely self-taught.
Never thought I'd see Phantom of the Opera on your channel! So excited to watch this! I was OBSESSED with Phantom when I was younger (not just this movie, but every version I could get my hands on) and even wrote an entire screenplay of my own based on the book when I was 10. 🤣
Agreed, I adore this musical, it's like Christmas has come early!
My password for all of my accounts was “Angelofmusic” for years hahah
Same here! I read and watched every fan creation and made some of my own. They are not exemplary relationships, but oh I love them so much. XD
When I was 19 me and my big sister took a trip to Toronto. We were able to get stand-by tickets for the show. The next day we got to tour the Theatre. The whole thing was a highlight.
- Cathy (&, accidently, Steve), Ottawa/Bytown/Pimisi
Same I still remember when I first listened to the tape in music class and fell in love instantly to the opening.
The Phantom would be a really good subject for Villain Therapy. He obviously needs it, and it’d be interesting to see what Jonathan has to say about him as a patient.
Please, I'd love to see that so much
Would they do the same IP twice, though? I’d have preferred they did one with the stage show if they did do so, but they’re a film channel, so…
@@brxzbze They’ve done two different videos about Encanto, multiple about Star Wars, etc. So probably
@@hoodie2shoes273 Yeah, but again the same issue with the film/stage version. Still would love a video on the Phantom, though.
I think Gerard butler was perfect for the part of the phantom. Most of the people who could hit all the notes perfectly were like Raul. They needed someone with rough edges. Someone to bring grit and some unstable mystery. It worked out well. Just imagine how blah the movie would be if the part of the phantom was played by a typical opera singer, another Raul. The casting was excellent, together they were able to tell a real story.
agreed. In the book the phantom taught himself how to sing, so IMO he might be a great tutor and composer, but doesn't have to be a perfect singer.
People often dont listen to the last part of “down once more” in which the trio sings over eachother
Raoul literally apologizes to her (“Christine, forgive me, please forgive me, I did it all of you”) for asking her to sing. While the phantom sings “his life is now a price which you must earn.” This is why I’ll always be team Raoul :)
This 👆 I don't understand some of this comments saying Raoul was gaslighting Christine by telling her Phantom didn't exist and that he was abusive because he used her as bait to trap the Phantom, like are you guys serious? First of all, I think people don't even know what gaslighting even means, Raoul tells Christine the Phantom is not real simply because he doesn't believe in ghost stories, he didn't have some ulterior motive to make Christine doubt herself to make her dependant on him, like a certain masked groomer, he just required physical proof of this so called "phantom" in order to believe in his existance. Secondly, yes, using Christine as bait was a dangerous move but it was a risk that needed to be taken in order to finally put a stop to the Phantom's reign of terror, and that is a fact even Christine comes to understand, which is why she ultimately decides to go along with it despite her fear, the alternative was to wait around and do nothing until the Phantom finally decided to kill Raoul and take Christine for good, that is if his temper didn't get the best of him and he ended up killing Christine aswell, and like you pointed out, Raul apologizes to Christine in the end for putting her in that position. I understand some people like the Phantom, I did too when I was a kid and I first saw the movie but as you get older you understand that Raoul was the right man for Christine, not only because the Phantom was an old man who took advantage of a child's grief to gaslight and groom the shit out of her so he could turn her into his perfect bride, but also because Raoul is a genuine good man, who loved Christine and risked his own life many times for her, even in the end when the Phantom takes her he doesn't give up on her and was willing to die for her, he says to her "don't throw your life away" when the Phantom demands of her to lie to him and tell him that she loves him in order to spare Raoul's life, Raoul basically says to her you don't need to lie to safe my life, safe yourself
Absolutely. (I can't comment on the book or (questionable) sequel but just think about the musical/this film on its own -) Raoul is a bit flippant to begin with as he doesn't believe her about the angel, but fair enough, and he still seems to care when he realises she's upset. Then from his point of view this mad murderer is threatening Christine, who is obviously scared, and he's trying to help and protect her. Even if he doesn't understand, he trusts her (e.g. in masquerade about the engagement ring, he trusts her and says something like 'I can only hope I will understand in time'). And you have to hear what he says in that last scene but he wants her to go, and not to 'throw her life away to save him'. His acting, especially in that last scene is so good and so heartbreaking. (Especially the ' I fought so hard to free you'). I think I used to think he wanted her to choose him over the phantom, but when you hear the words, you see that's not it at all and he truly loves her and wants her to be free and happy. (And as they say, the contrast of 'share my life with you' etc).
If anyone's interested, I think his lines are roughly:
Christine forgive me, please forgive me
I did it all for you and all for nothing
Say you love him and my life is over,
But either way you choose he has to win
Why make her lie to you to save me?
For heavens sake, Christine, say no, don't throw your life away to save me
I fought so hard to free you.
Not sure if you've done it, but I would love to see you discuss Westly and Buttercups relationship from the princess bride! There are definitely things they get right, but also some things that they would have to work through (not having any contact for 5 years and him being a pirate for that length of time, he would have changed a lot)
Tbf, most ppl dont rly watch Princess Bride for the main romance, it's just kinda the impetus that motivates the main plot to move forward. We watch PB for the adventure, the memes, and the great character acting. The bro bond Westley and Inigo form while trying to kill one another, Wallace Shaun being magnificent going "Inconceivable!", and of course "My name is Inigo Montoya...etc" The main romance is just kinda... there. Like its not too bad, not too great, you're kind of supposed to just accept that it's "True Love" and roll with it in order to get to the fun stuff.
Not only that but the incredible lengths to which Westley is willing to go on Buttercup's behalf -- battle a giant and a master swordsman, climb a tall cliff, dive into lightning sand, fight a giant rodent, endure torture, and even come back from the dead! Yes, she does make one or two sacrifices for him as well (such as when she agrees to go back to Humperdinck as long as he lets Westley go)...but really, he does far more for her than she ever does for him.
Omg princess bride would be amazing !
yesss!
I watch it for both. It would make a great Cinema Therapy piece!
It's wild that during filming, Emmy was only 17, while Patrick and Gerard were 30 and 34 respectively, yet they played her love interests!
I did not know that. Ew lol
She was cast when she was 16. If they weren’t on a film set, those two men would have been arrested for sexual assault of a minor for how they had to touch her. I’m truly disgusted that everyone involved was fine going along with this.
Oh - Oh no, I forgot about this and now you just re-triggered the memory of how young she actually was. Just...EWWWWWW-
@@Author.Noelle.Alexandria I mean, in most of europe the age of consent is 16. Not saying that it's weird, or even disgusting at times if the age difference is as big as it was here, but technically it's not illegal. So, by european standards, she is not considered a minor. Just saying
Historically, that was pretty accurate
It's worth noting that in the book the musical is based on the phantom actually uses some form of magic influence to seduce her. It's like the effect of drugging her - not just the kreeper vibes, actual manipulation of her mind....
If I remember correctly, it was a type of gas because it had a certain scent. I think it was even used on the Persian and Raoul at one point. 🤔
I haven't read the book, but I remember my eldest daughter did while in HS, and when I commented about how dark the movie is, my daughter informed me how much darker the book is!
He uses a type of gas to numb her senses so she's more "willing" to obey him, it has an exotic scent that Raoul catches on when he enters the dressing room
I do love that at the end it shows that the Phantom never stopped loving Christine but he respected her and Raoul's relationship.
I was a teenager when this came out and I remember my mom using it to explain real love vs possessive love and 13 year old me didn't understand fully but now I do and I carried that lesson through my dating life.
same, as a kid I would root for him, now he creeps me out lmao
I really love your profile name 🤍
Sounds like you did well in the mom-lottery!
Oh boy, complete 180 but this Phantom always reminds me of a math teacher I had that said she thought Gerard Butler looked handsome in the movie. It’s hard for me not to remember her while watching it because she had a stroke and couldn’t teach anymore.
My dad when this came out used it as “be nice to people because being ugly doesn’t mean be evil but if someone treats you like this, we’re getting rid of that real quick” but also “don’t date anybody because they all suck”
Ohooo, this is where the fun begins! All I can say is as a teenager I was fascinated by the dynamic between Christine and The Phantom. Now, as an adult, I understand why she chose Raul.
And, of course, as every girl with a decent vocal range I dreamt of playing Christine since I first discovered this movie 😂
They had to change one of the songs since her range wasn’t broad enough to do the role as originally written.
@@Author.Noelle.Alexandria I know. I know waay too much about Phantom of The Opera in general. Help! 😂
I left a similar comment; younger me was obsessed with the mystery of Phantom. Now as an adult I get how Raul was the healthy relationship and she chose correctly
Me too
I totally disagree on Raoul. He bullied her into the Don Juan performance and we never see him treat her as truly equal to him.
His progression in Love Never Dies didn't surprise me at all.
I think the healthiest thing would have been for her to escape them both
Butler brought a great emotional performance to the role. At the end you feel his pain, and his lust turned to love for Christine.
I have a deep abiding love for "music of the night" being controlling and terrible but THEN in contrast with "no more talk of darkness... let daylight dry your tears" like Phantom and Raoul are LEGIT day and night and it's in the lyrics of their love songs and everything just HHHHH
When Jonathon mentioned seeing the show in Sydney and the Phantom singing “music of the night” and “I thought I think I just got impregnated” I FELT that. When I saw Phantom live, during “music of the night” and “past the point” I thought the same thing 😂
That was me watching Peter Jöback in NYC as the Phantom in 2013. He's a Swedish pop star but hearing him do a Broadway musical live was such a treat. He was amazing.
Welcome to the world of every second k-pop fan
Truely amazing Sydeny production! I really hope to see it again in Melbourne if i can get there
I got to hear my high school crush singing “Music of the Night”. You can imagine my reaction as a high school drama kid.
I saw James Barbour on Broadway a few years ago and was left literally speechless, despite knowing every word and line.
I remember having only seen the movie and seeing the stage version, there is one little line change that makes SO much of a difference. Leading up to “All I Ask of You” before the rooftop, in the movie version Christine says “He’ll kill you, his eyes will find us there…” you being Raoul. But in the stage version she says “He’ll kill me.”
And it really should have hit earlier that phantom wasn’t a bad guy, but 16-year-old me needed to hear that to be like oh shit. Like he’s not just “romantically” 🤢 jealous, he is UNHEALTHY.
Gerald Butler does a bit too much sexy for the movie but it’s not his fault 😂
True. Disfigured, are you kidding me? That looked like a bad sunburn at worst; a society decades before OSHA and antibiotics (syphilis can do seriously nasty things to a human face) would have seen _a lot_ worse things.
I think they hired Gerard Butler because he'd just looked sexy AF in Dracula, and then couldn't bear uglying him up. Pity about it, it makes the whole fuss about his face a bit ridiculous.
In the book he looks like the silent movie, Lon Chany version, skeletal looking body, his whole face monstrous.
Yeah they could have made his face look a lot worse. I've always said, the good half of his face more than makes up for whatever went on with the other side 😂
Request for Everafter. The Step Mother portrayed by Anjelica Huston always confused me with her being horrible to Danielle but then had very small moments of affection for her. I’d love to see that character diagnosed.
I honestly think she really loved Danielle's father and that bled through sometimes.
And also one of the stepsisters having a change of heart
A good thing I am only here for the food ;)
OH MY GOSH YES! That’s one of my favorite films of all time.
@blissinchains Didn't the stepmom say something like, "You have so much of your father in you"?
As someone who has fallen prey to a psychologically abusive narcissist in my past... this is the therapy I wish I'd had years ago ^_^' No surprise that this has been one of my favorite films for a long time and I've always been team Phantom like an idiot
I have always been on Erik's side. Now that i am a way older woman!
@@ingridmay66Obviously, there is a reason for everything psychologically. I believe the phantom exhibit these toxic traits due to the trauma he has been through. But he definitely isnt a saint, the traits he does portray are very controlling and abusive. I have been with someone portraying very similar traits to the phantom and its absoloutely terrifying trust me. I would never ever wish this type of relationship onto my worst enemy because it really does fuck you up. But yes, phantom is just beyond cruel, but again he went through hell and back and doesn’t know how to deal with his trauma. But his trauma definitely does not justify his behavior towards Christine
My grandma tried to set me up with Patrick Wilson when they both lived in Tampa, FL about 20 years ago because she knew his father and knew we both liked musical theatre. Thank you for having such faith in me, Grandma. I would have been alright with that arranged marriage.
Haha Go Grandma
@@reikun86 Good Guy Grandma
This movie is my guiltiest of guilty pleasures! Aesthetically, it’s gorgeous, and it did introduce me to a story that means a lot to me as a teen, so I can never bring myself to hate it even if I do recognize its MANY flaws as an adult
This cannot be a guilty pleassure, shout it, i mean, not the healthiest relationship, but there are not many healthy relationships on the big screen, the notebook, for example.
Lol this movie is my completely guiltless pleasure 😂
@@valeriaperez9427 I disagree on there not being many healthy relationships on the big screen. Gomez and Morticia of The Addams Family have a healthy relationship. George and Mary of It’s A Wonderful Life have a healthy relationship. Shrek and Fiona of Shrek have a healthy relationship. Hideko and Sook-Hee of The Handmaiden have a healthy relationship. I can name many more, but if you really think that there aren’t many examples of healthy relationships on film, I highly recommend watching more films.
@@spookyspice596 you're right, i also think I should watch some more films tho, also i haven't thought of those relationships, i didn't say all of the relationships are "toxic", i'm sorry if I bothered you, i just wanted to encourage not to see this movie as a guilty pleassure, as a story is beautiful, and it's actually one of mine and many people's favorite.
Nah, this film's Baz Luhrmann -lookin' ass is one of my unironic faves. ^_^
Gerard Butler may not be an opera singer, but what magnificent acting. Perfect Phantom.
No one can change my mind about All I Ask of You being one of the best love songs. Also, I really like Patrick Wilson’s Raoul so much. I’m getting personal here but I suffered depression last year and every time I broke down crying (whenever I had headphones) I would put on the song and pretend he was singing to me to calm me down. I know it sounds so silly but it really helped me. So what if Raoul has a few flaws (not counting the book because the only Raoul I genuinely like is Wilson’s). I think he also was the better choice for Christine.
I’d love to see your take on Seven Brides for Seven Brothers. I’ve always found it odd that all the women in my family love it, while all the men are like, “dude, that’s messed up.”
That is very weird. It should be flipped around. Cause when I, as a woman watched that movie for the first time, I was like, "what kind of caveman bullsh*t is this!" LOL
Precisely, it's the only musical of its kind that promotes Stockholm Syndrome as a positive thing, and almost nobody I know picks up on the sinister undertones.
Well, they do realise that they were wrong in the end. It was made in the 50s, that's honestly more progressive than a lot of other movies made at the same time. Millie isn't really a pushover either.
You sure it's not about the music for the ladies? Cause I find that musical highly questionable, yet I love watching it and sing "Bless Your Beautiful Hide" as if my life depended on it. 🤣
Loved it as a child, then watching it as an adult i was like, “that’s uh…kidnapping”
could you do the 25th anniversary as well? it’s not technically a movie, but sierra boggess’s christine is SO different and i think it makes the story feel very different. it could be a really cool discussion.
Ramin Karimloo’s phantom is incredible as well!
Yes! The movie is what got me into POTO but when I watched Ramin and Sierra and realized what the vocals should be like I was in love with this musical for the longest time.
I mostly liked the movie, but I only became obsessed with POTO once I watched the 25th anniversary version. The movie Christine did a good job, but I only started to love Christine’s character, when I watched Sierra Boggess’ incredible performance. She and Ramin Karimloo (and Hadley Fraser) made me listen to the album on repeat for days, while I didn’t even bother to listen to the movie ost 😅
@@flusel4949 I'm obsessed with Ramin Karimloo's and Sierra Boggess too 🤩🤩😍😍
Oh my goodness and Carlotta in that one! I love every single moment of it, her going all gooey over that ballet singer (role reversal, anybody?) and her whole Primadonna act, and goodness me, the costumes. She's the perfect Carlotta as far as I'm concerned.
And Raoul in that one is splendid, too. I like the 25th anniversary version better than the movie, I'm afraid. I guess that musical just belongs on stage.
I always thought that when Christine kissed Phantom, the first kiss was for her. Her pleads for him to let Raoul go. The second one I think was for him. A thank you for helping her and being there for her for years
So I was a teenager when this movie came out and I remembered all these girls in my choir class were really into this movie. The romanticizing of their relationship really left an imprint on many little girls to probably go forward in life and be willing victims to all sorts of weirdness.
Honestly I love Gerard as the phantom. His voice carries so much weight and intensity. Sure he wasn't a trained singer, but that makes it all the more impressive to me. It's so rough and edgy and carries the heaviness of his soul.
Yeah, I was also impressed by his talent and dedication to the role.. I love his rough and dangerous voice, because he sounds like a tormented man.👌 And his acting made me cry. 😊Unpopular opinion, although the singers have beautiful voices, but I don’t feel passion in a theatrical production.....
Yup, I was eating spaghetti when they started in on Butler's lack of range. My noodles fell with what Alan was saying. Butler is the reason why I watched this movie in the first place. I wasn't a POTO fan, I'm not a fan of Opera by any means and this style of film bores me immensely. But for me, Gerard Butler not only made it enjoyable but also made me love the film. I mean Emmy Rossum was great and has an absolutely beautiful voice, but she didn't make me like the movie. 😁
@@PinkSander phantom of the opera isnt a fucking opera
@@thepinkestpigglet7529 Sir, who pissed in your Wheaties this morning? Who hurt you? Who wronged you so egregiously that it elicited a response like that from you? Do better. I'm sure Jono and Allan would be tickled pink to know one of their followers acts like that in their comment section.
I agree - i loved the power yet simultaneous vulnerability in his voice. There was a sort of frustration that carried and fit the character perfectly. And ive had chorus teachers that weren’t amazing singers themselves - you don’t have to be to teach someone imo. He is a musical genius in his compositions and operas is how i took it. I know plenty of talented musicians who can’t sing for shit.
And @The Pinkest Piglet - its a play about operas, im sure thats what she meant
I LOVE Gerard Butler as the Phantom!!🙌 He put so much emotion into the music and that really makes it for me, I couldn’t have anyone else be the phantom. He was perfect and I will die on this hill😂
Lol I'm so glad I found this. My ex was like "oh she should have chosen the opera ghost". And then listened to a breakdown by me and his brother on why no she really shouldn't have.
I just felt the need to add that Erik is not only a musical genius, he is an architectural genius as well, which contributed to his bloody past actually and really started to mess his mind.
Also in the books he was a really good assassin too. In the movie they sing "keep your hand at the level of your eyes" bc his signature assassin move was a garrotte I believe (or something similar). It's been a while since I read it.
@@StanLeeFan12 The garrote thing is actually what he picked up from all the things he did for the Shah...who he made the mirror labyrinth for.....which was the inspiration for his hideouts and traps.
So true
@@StanLeeFan12 this is true
Speaking of "Aslan!" I think a video on "The Chronicles of Narnia, the Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe", would be awesome! Particularly analyzing the relationship between Peter and Edmund, or on the theme of forgiveness and redemption.
In both the books and movies, I say Edmund is easily the most interesting and complex out of the Pevensie siblings.
@@msk-qp6fn Lucy I’d my favorite!
@@bethany8734 Oh Lucy is my fave too, she's delightful!!
Yes a million times yes
I've asked them this many times, I really hope they do it at some point!
I have a theory that rather than the phantom being the angel Christine’s father sent, it was Raoul. Think about it. He came into her life either shortly before or after her father’s death, he's a patron of the arts, and repeatedly affirms all he wants is to protect Christine and make her happy. It's just speculation, but it wouldn't surprise me if that was the original intention.
Emmy Rossum, Patrick Wilson, Gerald Butler, Minnie Driver, Miranda Richardson, Jennifer Ellison, Ciaran Hinds & Simon Callow are ALL carried this movie well 👍🏻
The music, the sets, the aesthetics.. just wow ✨
It’s a mark of how much I love both phantom of the opera and cinema therapy that I’m willing to put myself through 30 minutes of Gerard Butler’s singing for this
🤣 He needs to go to the ICU for those burns! 😂
@@AmaraJordanMusic Maybe just put a mask over it lol
I used to love the original novel so much. Erik is a fascinating character. When his past is revealed, and that you learn that he became what he is because it was his only way of survival. The queen he served made him kill for her enjoyement. The king tried to have him murdered so he couldn't tell the secrets of the palace he build for them... The society always treated him like a monster so he ended up thinking he was one... Until Christine appeared in his life and he started thinking he could have his "happy ever after", since she was not seeing him as a monster but a heavenly creature.
The moral of the book was interesting: "Erik behave like a monster, but if the world treated him slightly better, maybe he would have turned better". If only there were more people who could see the good in him.
looking glass self
@Eliane R. Erik is very similar to Quasimodo. He was also abused and treated like a monster because of how he looked not just by society, but by Frollo. Until Esmeralda treated him with kindness and mercy and he felt for the first time like a human. At first he wanted a relationship with Esmeralda, but she doesn't owe him that also Quasimodo would've been an obsessed sociopath like Frollo if he went too far with her. I like them as friends way more, besides Phoebus treats Esmeralda like a human, like she is. Of course Quasimodo didn't kill anyone, so he's more likeable. And I love Adam from Beauty and the Beast because he actually DID make an effort to change his attitude towards Belle and showed her that he does have a heart. I get angry when people dismiss the film as "Stockholm syndrome" and ignore Adam's shift in demeanor.
@@summerrose8110 Totally. And IIRC Belle did a good job too holding him accountable and calling him out whenever he was acting out of line. She didn't let him get away with his behavior.
I lovvvvve Gerard as the phantom. He’s got a great voice for this character. I love his voice here as it makes sense for the book character (not the musical)
"Sometimes the monsters we're scared of are the monsters we create through our lack of compassion."
If you think the relationships in THIS movie are creepy, wait until you watch the sequel (Love Never Dies) and every character's personality is taken up to eleven.
As a side note, if you analyze more musical relationships, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the love triangle (Cosette x Marius x Eponine) in Les Miserables.
The relationships in this movie aren't creepy at all. I've seen much worse... I see a man who desperately loves a girl and fights for her love in inappropriate ways, because he does not know how to behave and how to keep his beloved because of isolation. Of course, the girl chose the perfect prince and lived a happy life. The Phantom is not a predator, he's a victim.😅
@@ingridmay66 I’ve seen worse too (look no further than Twilight), but my point wasn’t that they’re creepy in THIS movie.
My point is that they’re MADE creepy in Love Never Dies, a sequel which fails to capture the same beauty of the original.
@@bunnychu15 Yes, the script of "Love Never Dies" is weird, but I liked the music and the songs.
@@ingridmay66 True! Most the music to Love Never Dies is good. It’s just the plot that makes no sense.
@@bunnychu15 The weirdest thing was that Christine gave birth to a child from the Phantom. She slept with the Phantom before her wedding to the Viscount. So, she can't even be faithful to Raoul. What the hell was that! 😅😅😅Because in this version, Christine did not love the phantom and wanted to run away so that he would not find her.....😆
19:32 They cut the line "He was bound to love you when he heard you sing," heavily implying that she's only lovable because he made her something to be loved. Even in his moment of heartbreak, he is trying to claim credit for her happiness and success.
One of my favourite parts in the show is the second Notes segment, in the Phantom’s letters, when he says ‘If pride will let her return to me…’ This is such a great example of him twisting the situation around to shift the blame onto Christine, and making it seem like it was her fault for ‘leaving’ him when she never even promised to stay. Like you said, he claims her achievements as his own (though obviously he still idealises her)
Nice analysis, but I've always personally thought that was Phantom referring to himself. When Christine first sang when she was younger, he thought he fell in love with her but it was actually an obsession.
@@brxzbze In the Phantom's defence, he was the one that taught her to sing in the first place. Yeah, taking complete credit for her achievements isn't right, but he deserves some of it.
The first time I watched it, I wasn’t convinced about Gérard Butler, but as I think about the phantoms character as a whole now, I think he was cast right because his role is more than just the singing he hast to act like he’s deranged and Girard Plays that well for a movie
Right -- like for a wider audience not used to watching musicals maybe having a phantom who can sing virtuosically wouldn't have the same impact vs Gerards raspiness which makes him feel more villainous. But yeah his singing is so bad sometimes
I remember listening to a "making of" or the commentary track and they discussed the casting choice with him. They said this movie was for a wider audience and they needed non theater people to buy into the mysterious bad boy phantom. They needed that Rockstar quality and I think Gerard absolutely delivered.
Phantom has long been one of my favorites. Erik has known nothing but anger and mistreatment and callousness, so that is what he gives back to the world. At the end, he gets exactly what he wants: Christine chooses to stay with him. And he didn't expect that. He expected he would have to kill Raoul and kidnap Christine and he expected to always have this contention between himself and Christine. So having that expectation subverted, and to be left with this feeling that ultimately feels bad because of forcing this decision on the person you want, flips a switch. He realizes he wants her, but not like this. And he ultimately wants her happiness. It becomes real love and I LOVE that for him.
I adore the breakdown on how toxic the relationships are between characters. My only wish with the episode would be a further breakdown of Alan's critiques. I know the show is generally positive, but I'd love to see his thoughts on how they could improve things he alluded to like the editing and stagecraft. As a studying filmmaker, hearing a professional's opinions and examples would help tremendously in improving my work.
they might have some in the director's cut on their website. It will be posted on the 27th there, if you want to check it out.
the full director's cuts usually have more alan, he cuts himself out quite a lot!
When I saw it on stage The Phantom was about seven feet tall (no joke I met him at the stage door) and Christine was about five foot flat and at a really emotional part of the movie when the Phantom was on his knees the man’s head was at the same level as hers. And that really helps show how overpowering the phantom is in comparison without the creepy age difference.
its always made me so sad that phantom of the opera is my mom's favorite, we always get into arguments about how the phantom is toxic but she's never backed down from her viewpoint that the phantom is charming. Like, the phantom for her is a catch, she thinks he's dreamy and it just makes me sad. Says a lot about my stepdad tho lmao
One of the brilliant things about "Point of No Return" on stage is that the Phantom disguises himself and sings as another character. I used to wish that this movie did the same thing, but watching it now, the scene really gives Christine more agency and purpose, which is great for her character.
Love that Johno went from "oop i see tongue 😳" to "just the tip 😜" in about 10 seconds
Also -
I dig this story because the Phantom's motives (not his actions) are highly sympathetic. His motives come from wanting to be loved despite his looks, which is pretty universal. Losing someone you're enamored with to someone else (whether they're better for the person or not) can also be pretty relatable. But I think the Phantom only experiences real love a couple of times here - he falls in love with her when she gives him back his mask, and his first real act of love is when he lets her go at the end.
I may have never experienced the theatre portrayal of the Phantom, but I personally like the way GB sang. His voice sounds sensual and ghostly.
My takeaway from the story is: People need to be understood and treated with empathy and compassion, even villains.
Tell that to Ultra Vegito who decided second chances were bs from the start. He would have murdered the Phantom because he may look like a God and Gods deserve nothing according to Vegito
@@nestorsifuentesaguirre2722 Well in Dragon Ball that's a different story... Idk about this saga with Ultra Vegito yet as a new fan who is more familiar (yet not so familiar) with Dragon Ball Z. But Goku himself would have given him a second chance as he did to Frieza.
@@HingYok Read that fan manga taken after the recent sagas and you'll see that Vegito was right about the Gods and by God the Phantom may be included.
Speaking of Aslan - I wouldn't mind seeing an episode on that. Particularly the arc of Edmund's betrayal and the dinamics of siblings. Right now the my most rough relationship in my family is with my sister. It'd be a neat episiode esecially considering the range of ages involved.
Yes- that would be fun to see!
Yes, that'd be informative to see. My sister is a ghosting PIA. 😆
I don't want to ruin CS Lewis for you, but The Chronicles of Narnia are basically an isekai anime featuring Jesus's fursona.
the movies did a good job of adding a sort of realism to the stories, about them as siblings, about them being suddenly swept into a strange land with a heavy responsibility on their heads, and the fact that they're all young children dealing with the fact that there is a war going on.
@@18Hongo lol, I don't think this is news to anyone, but sure, it is a conservative religious story with backwards stereotypes of men and women. Still a fun read, hated the movies thou