Also, while this doesn't really involve a card from chaos impact specifically GB Tamer editor cannot be used as fusion material, you CANNOT contact fusion with it and more importantly it cannot be used as fusion material for super poly so don't let your opponent eat your Tamer editor and Domi for a starving venom
Avramax summoned by I:P Masquerna: Oh? You’re approaching me? Instead of running away, you’re coming right to me? Dingirsu: I can’t beat the shit out of you without coming closer.
I'm happy to have watched this video, glad beast was my first meta deck even though I didn't play it competitively back then but as a true glad beast player I have to know how to play it properly, luckily I've checked myself on the deck w/ old cards & new, I'm very familiar w/ the combos and I look forward to better myself in future games, this video was very informative, thank you.
Great information on the Glad Beasts. Been playing these since day one, and people continuously misplay them. God I wish Chariot was still a fantastic card. Editor is so good, though.
And for those of you that play it, Gladiator Beast United is another card that can special summon a Gladiator Beast Fusion Monster from the extra deck, ignoring it's summoning conditions, using monsters in your hand, field, and/or Graveyard. The conditions for this card, though (unlike Tamer Editor), are: A: Must be done during the battle phase. B: Requires the materials listed on the Fusion Monster be in one of the three specified spots. Now, I've play-tested this on YGO-PRO multiple times, and apparently you CAN use monsters previously summoned by Tamer Editor's effect for the effect of summoning out a fusion monster with GB United. Also, even though Tamer Editor itself says that it can't be used for fusion materials, but apparently GB United works around that as well?? I don't know if these would hold up in actual tournament play or not, and I don't personally have the funds to build my own deck to try it out, but if I could get some clarification on if these would actually hold up under actual tournament rulings, I would greatly appreciate it.
You can strike I:P effect but if you let the effect resolve you can’t then negate the summon of the monster. If you just link summon using I:P they can use strike to negate the summon like any link summon.
You can strike the summon of that ever that comes out from IP's summon as long as IP is chain link 1. Because it states after this cards resolution. Thus the last action is no longer the effect of ip resolving but just the link summon itself. Putting it to chain link 2 will make it so that the last thing to resolve to not be the summon anymore. This isn't new, this was common with synchros with formula synchron and going into trishula and people questioned if it can be solemn judgmented.
Comeback is the reason I’m still main decking murmillo(fish that pops a targeted monster) and retiari(Aqua that banishes an opponents card in GY) And they can definitely come in clutch
Good stuff. The last part in the video regarding cards that have been summon through the " ignore summon condition " clause needs to be touched on in a wider aspect
Also any GB fusion summoned off of Tamer Editor's effect does not count as being properly fusion summoned so they cannot be revived through comeback or monster reborn later on in the game. Thats also why gb players should consider a copy of imdomitable gladiator beast. It recycles gladiator beast cards(not just monsters thanks to errata) for free
Isn’t IP a card effect summoning a link monster? From the card text it seems like it just allows the player to make a link summon during his/her opponents turn. I’m just trying to wrap my head around black horn because I know black horn can only stop synchro, xyz, link, basically inherent summons. Please elaborate more thank you.
Hey what’s good man. Question, a judge a my locals who’s been judging for over 8 years, says Borrelsword Dragon can attack twice without using its effect to switch a monster from attack to defense. Is that true?
Not true if he says Borrelsword can attack twice without using it's effect. It is true that even if the monster doesn't go to defense Borrelsword can still attack twice after activation. Full break down: Conjunction: Also is the key word. 1. To attack twice it needs to activate the effect that allows Borrelsword to attack twice. Which requires Borrelsword to target an atk position monster. 2. Resolution the monster goes to defense. 3. Also, you can now attack twice with Borrelsword. Because it says "also", even if the targeted monster doesn't go-to defense position you can still atk twice with borrelsword. Under the also conjunction: even if the first part of the effect doesn't happen the other parts will still apply in resolution.
Question about spirit of banishment or malice...the one with attack declaration...says ss a lv8 friend from GY. Proceed to damage calc. YGO pro seems to do damage 2x so I am wondering if that is same...try out the combo and lmk
I don't know if you can, but can you discuss Dinowrestlers? I'm interested in playing them and some insight can help. Yugipedia doesn't help much for me.
Hello guys I have a question..can tamer editor be used for contact fusion? In the text it says "can't be used as fusion material" but I have seen some1 on TH-cam who said that he can be used..you got any idea what's correct?
Chain link 1 scenario: Ip activates effect, ip effect resolves, enemy link summons: basically as if your opponent would make a normal Link Summon during his turn, you can use the Solemns to negate the Special Summon of the opponents Link Monster Chain Link 2 becomes more spicy: you activate Raigeki Chain Link 1 while you have Solemn Judgement and Solemn Strike set (and rdy), IP activates effect Chain Link 2 If you wouldnt use your Set cards: Ip effect resolves, Monster gets Link Summoned, Rageki effect comes through In this scenario you can only activate Strike on IPs effect and you cant activate either Judgement nor Strike on the Link Summon because: Since the effect is Chain Link 2 and the Link Summon is done immediatly after IPS effect, your own Chain Link 1 card (this case Raigeki) is chainblocking you and causing you to miss the timing on Judgment, thats why you can only use Strike on the effect activation of IP
MST.TV another quick question Can I use test panther + another GB monster to make GB Dragases by making test panther go from 2-link rating to 1-link and therefore also making it count as one of the materials needed? Or because GB Dragases is a specific 2 GB monsters this can’t work?
You're correct in where you state that "because GB Dragases is a specific 2 GB monsters this can’t work". Dragases will always have to have 2 Glad beast monsters to be link summoned, which is actually one of it's biggest drawbacks, unfortunately.
Please tell what the interaction is between the unchained monsters effect of using opponents monster as link materials, and a monster that is "unaffected by other card effects" (masterpiece, ultimate raidfalcon etc). Can those monsters be used as link materials via the effect of the unchained monsters ??
I do believe it works as material like xyz monsters, so since material isn’t affected by monster effects just used as materials I think it would work, but it might jot work like xyz, and if it doesn’t then I might be 100% wrong.
@MST.TV Red Reboot vs Orcust Crescendo Orcust Crescendo in the GY, activated to grab a monster. Red Reboot to negate. Does the banished Crescendo get set on the field?
I am currently q small tier 2 judge and I'm curious about chain link order if there is a chain link 3 going on and the chain link three resolves and next is two am I allowed to respond to it with an effect negation or would it have to br the first monster in the chain link order
Short answer: You can only respond to the last action on a building chain (following the rule of letting your opponent add a chain link in response to your action). So for an effect negation you either have to respond immediately to the effect (ex. Solemn Strike), or in the current chain (before it starts to resolve) activate a card like Infinite Imperm/ Effect Veiler/ Lost Wind (for a monster negate). Only continuous effects may apply between chain links of a resolving chain. For example you have Thunder Dragon Colossus with no thunders in GY, and a set Burial from a different dimension. Your opponent's looks at your GY, then activates Raigeki. You then chain BFADD, targeting a banished thunder monster. During resolution, the thunder monster is RETURNED to GY, then Raigeki resolves trying to destroy the Colossus. But Colossus's continuous effect lets it banish the returned thunder to avoid destruction if its owner wants it. An other example letting you affect something in the middle of a resolving chain is the following: At the start of your 3rd turn, you activate a monster trigger effect (E-HERO stratos search effect), then chain a quickplay spell like Mystik Wok (tribute as cost to gain LP equal to ATK), then chain Call of the Haunted targeting your monster (now in GY), while your opponent has a Spellcaster and Magician's right hand face up on their field. Your trap will resolve properly, special summoning the tributed Stratos, Magician's Right hand will not allow Wok to resolve, then at last you get the search from Stratos. (also the "new" stratos will miss it's timing to activate again) An other example showing how powerful continuous effects are: You have 1 card in your hand, a "The Fabled Unicore" and a set "Twin Twisters" on the field. Your opponent has "Orcust Babel", "Longirsu" pointing at your "Unicore", a set "Crescendo" , and no cards in their hand. They try to activate "Longirsu" to get rid of your monster, then you chain "Twin Twisters" discarding your last card and making your hands equal, then they chain the set "Crescendo" to negate your "Twins". "Crescendo" will try to resolve but now your "Unicore"'s condition has been fulfiled, so their counter-trap is negated and destroyed, your "Twins" will resolve destroying the remaining "Babel", then the effect of "Longirsu" will be negated and "Unicore" will try to destroy it, but Longirsu's continuous effect that protects it from destruction will let it stay on the field, as only activations are negated, not other effects (unlike skill drain, white howling etc that negate entire effects across the field) Hope it helps
So when considering the materials needed to summon Avramax ( 2+ monster from the extra deck ) would pendulum monsters that were pendulum summoned from the extra deck be appropriate materials?
RULINGS QUESTION If I control predaplant tryph. on my side of the field and my opponent attempts an instant fusion summon of relinquished, am I able to negate the summon and destroy before hes able to use it's effectto steal my monster ??
@@DeityLink540 thanks ! I thought I was right, but my opponent ensured me I had to negate the instant fusion card effect itself. I ended up losing that duel after I superpolyed his full orcust board
What happens when I activate Nekroz Of Trishula as chain link 1 and in chain link 2 my opponent discards their entire had, does Trishula get its effect?
@Charmiskit More about Ogre and Velier, since they both have in their text that part thay say GY, so if her effect is activated and Berserker is activated in chain banishing him, dont it prevent from hitting the GY therefore hitting a part of their effect?
@@ketsura3618 I think you're thinking of a situation where there is a blanket banishing effect on the field. Dark law is a perfect example of stopping ogre and veiler because they can't reach the graveyard in the first place. Berserker banishes them as the next chain link and they're already in the grave so the effect still goes through. They discard as cost so they hit the graveyard immediately after chaining to something. It's the reason why called by the grave can hit the ghost girls and veiler.
MST.TV Ook so the ruling was right. Thank Mr. TomBox. Btw this just happens to me on YGOPro. I activate allure of darkness and they chain Lancea. Apparently I get too draw the 2 cards and don’t banish anything. Free draw 2. Is this the right ruling or YGOPro was wrong?
@@Phoester yes it is correct. They just show u a dark and that's that. U cannot allure under lancea but if lancea was chained it's now pot of greed if u can show a dark
Could you provide a more solid example on how I:P Masquerena's effect could Chain Block being Solemn Judgment? I just don't even see what other effects you could Chain into while trying to use her effect that would make any sense? These videos of misplays of yours are great but it would be even better if you could maybe showcase, demonstrate with actual cards on the screen what people are doing wrong rather than just talk about it. Would be more helpful in clarification of certain misplays and would make the these videos a lot more interesting to watch as well. Thanks!
Azaizer If it’s CL2 then when you Link Summon you still have to resolve the CL1 (you or your opponent) after in order to finish resolving the chain. That way, the summon is still inside the resolution of the chain, and you cannot activate a card or effect during a resolution.
@@Joerisama well I still couldn't make sense of it and just found this under the rulings of how/when you can use Solemn Judgment - The effects of "Thunder King Rai-Oh", "Black Horn of Heaven", "Solemn Judgment", and similar cards can only be activated when a monster Special Summons itself without starting a Chain, such as when a Special Summon monster Special Summons itself. My next question is, if you activate Masquerena only, can your opponent then Chain Solemn Judgment to destroy Masquerena itself due to it's effect to Link Summon from the Extra deck? Or do they have to wait for Masquerena's effect to resolve FIRST and then they can attempt to Solemn Judgment whatever was SS from the Extra Deck and then negate that monster's summoning?
If u use Raye's effect to summon out Kagari.. it isn't a link summon therefore it is improperly summoned, so it cannot be special summoned from the graveyard Therefore if someone uses shark cannon and target her, she must be banished because u cannot special summon her from grave as she wasn't summoned properly. You have to remember she wasn't summoned properly which something people's constantly forget and sometimes people use hiita to attempt special summon her.
MST.TV bc the actual wording on rayes quick effect says special summon not link summon?!?! Holy crap I never thought about that or even realized it . (Booooooooooooooom)
Its weird bc if someone tried to Monster reborn a fusion monster or something outta they grave that they didn’t fusion summon properly I would notice. I can’t even begin to think how many times it’s completely blown past me with link monsters
@@lewisrussell3645 they just have to be properly summoned based off fusion summon Or by their own summoning condition but if it was summoned via neither... Then that summon is illegal.
@@MSTTV yeah I looked at bownty and said to myself, this is a good card but how can I make the best use of it and then I thought of gbs. The fact that you can get a war chariot to load up for next turn sounded crazy to me
Also, while this doesn't really involve a card from chaos impact specifically GB Tamer editor cannot be used as fusion material, you CANNOT contact fusion with it and more importantly it cannot be used as fusion material for super poly so don't let your opponent eat your Tamer editor and Domi for a starving venom
Oh yeah that's huge!!
Yes i played editor yesterday and it saved me from a super poly play cause it cant be used for fusion material.
Loved old Glad Beasts back when they first came out. Really happy to see them getting support in 2019 still.
Avramax summoned by I:P Masquerna:
Oh? You’re approaching me? Instead of running away, you’re coming right to me?
Dingirsu:
I can’t beat the shit out of you without coming closer.
I'm happy to have watched this video, glad beast was my first meta deck even though I didn't play it competitively back then but as a true glad beast player I have to know how to play it properly, luckily I've checked myself on the deck w/ old cards & new, I'm very familiar w/ the combos and I look forward to better myself in future games, this video was very informative, thank you.
I love watching all these ruling vids. Keeps me up to date with rulings. WOOT!
Tombox has the Judging mastery, I’ve had to pull up some of your vids during tournament to explain to people weird interactions
Great information on the Glad Beasts. Been playing these since day one, and people continuously misplay them. God I wish Chariot was still a fantastic card. Editor is so good, though.
And for those of you that play it, Gladiator Beast United is another card that can special summon a Gladiator Beast Fusion Monster from the extra deck, ignoring it's summoning conditions, using monsters in your hand, field, and/or Graveyard. The conditions for this card, though (unlike Tamer Editor), are:
A: Must be done during the battle phase.
B: Requires the materials listed on the Fusion Monster be in one of the three specified spots.
Now, I've play-tested this on YGO-PRO multiple times, and apparently you CAN use monsters previously summoned by Tamer Editor's effect for the effect of summoning out a fusion monster with GB United. Also, even though Tamer Editor itself says that it can't be used for fusion materials, but apparently GB United works around that as well?? I don't know if these would hold up in actual tournament play or not, and I don't personally have the funds to build my own deck to try it out, but if I could get some clarification on if these would actually hold up under actual tournament rulings, I would greatly appreciate it.
I’ve see a guy activate shark cannon the same turn he set it
Imagine having 3 of the Glad Beasts revive spell and getting Rivalry flipped on you, IMAGINE.
Then you activate 1 comeback, set I bestiary and contact fuse... Gyzarus... Pop 2
@@MSTTV Sensei... I have failed you
Wow that ruling with Kagari and shark cannon blows my mind. I actually had no idea
It happens A LOT at the top tables .... :(...
@Charmiskit people just forget.... Because Kagari is a monster that can be summoned properly and is usually done so...
You can strike I:P effect but if you let the effect resolve you can’t then negate the summon of the monster.
If you just link summon using I:P they can use strike to negate the summon like any link summon.
You can strike the summon of that ever that comes out from IP's summon as long as IP is chain link 1. Because it states after this cards resolution. Thus the last action is no longer the effect of ip resolving but just the link summon itself.
Putting it to chain link 2 will make it so that the last thing to resolve to not be the summon anymore.
This isn't new, this was common with synchros with formula synchron and going into trishula and people questioned if it can be solemn judgmented.
Comeback is the reason I’m still main decking murmillo(fish that pops a targeted monster) and retiari(Aqua that banishes an opponents card in GY)
And they can definitely come in clutch
i've lost too many times to not reading cards, but i never learn
Hi tom, I really enjoy your rulings videos! Keep it up !
Good stuff. The last part in the video regarding cards that have been summon through the " ignore summon condition " clause needs to be touched on in a wider aspect
Also any GB fusion summoned off of Tamer Editor's effect does not count as being properly fusion summoned so they cannot be revived through comeback or monster reborn later on in the game.
Thats also why gb players should consider a copy of imdomitable gladiator beast. It recycles gladiator beast cards(not just monsters thanks to errata) for free
glad beast making the comeback
Isn’t IP a card effect summoning a link monster? From the card text it seems like it just allows the player to make a link summon during his/her opponents turn. I’m just trying to wrap my head around black horn because I know black horn can only stop synchro, xyz, link, basically inherent summons. Please elaborate more thank you.
Thanks for sharing, this helps out a lot.
Hey what’s good man. Question, a judge a my locals who’s been judging for over 8 years, says Borrelsword Dragon can attack twice without using its effect to switch a monster from attack to defense. Is that true?
Not true if he says Borrelsword can attack twice without using it's effect. It is true that even if the monster doesn't go to defense Borrelsword can still attack twice after activation.
Full break down:
Conjunction: Also is the key word.
1. To attack twice it needs to activate the effect that allows Borrelsword to attack twice. Which requires Borrelsword to target an atk position monster.
2. Resolution the monster goes to defense.
3. Also, you can now attack twice with Borrelsword.
Because it says "also", even if the targeted monster doesn't go-to defense position you can still atk twice with borrelsword.
Under the also conjunction: even if the first part of the effect doesn't happen the other parts will still apply in resolution.
I recommend that judge to study up on conjunctions
MST.TV thank you so much
Love the ruling videos!! Ty!
Activate rejection. Activate unexpected dai.
I heard Jojo reference then i instanly click the like button
man I love these videos,I am a returning player and these really help!
Question about spirit of banishment or malice...the one with attack declaration...says ss a lv8 friend from GY. Proceed to damage calc. YGO pro seems to do damage 2x so I am wondering if that is same...try out the combo and lmk
This vid really makes me want to read cards more thoroughly
Yes!
Cool stuff bro.
Another illegal move that can be seen with comeback is trying to revive a monster that was summoned with the effect of tamer editor.
Yes, that was the final example of improperly summoned monsters.
My bad. I didn't watch the video until last seconds...
@@enricofilippozzi6637 np, u just affirmed it some more
@@MSTTV i misplayed the video 😂
I don't know if you can, but can you discuss Dinowrestlers? I'm interested in playing them and some insight can help. Yugipedia doesn't help much for me.
Hello guys I have a question..can tamer editor be used for contact fusion? In the text it says "can't be used as fusion material" but I have seen some1 on TH-cam who said that he can be used..you got any idea what's correct?
My ruiling question is can you use grazyuas and tamer edition to contact fuse into other tamer to cause a loop or no ?
Do you know if zeroboros will be errata'd to be properly translated to its OCG counter part ?
Thanks a million times for these gb vids 🙏😊i freaking love Them 🙌😃
Is it possible to use the eyes of timaeus spell card top summed master of chaos
Can I get a more descriptive example on the solemn Vs I.P. Masquerana ruling please?
Chain link 1 scenario: Ip activates effect, ip effect resolves, enemy link summons: basically as if your opponent would make a normal Link Summon during his turn, you can use the Solemns to negate the Special Summon of the opponents Link Monster
Chain Link 2 becomes more spicy: you activate Raigeki Chain Link 1 while you have Solemn Judgement and Solemn Strike set (and rdy),
IP activates effect Chain Link 2
If you wouldnt use your Set cards: Ip effect resolves, Monster gets Link Summoned, Rageki effect comes through
In this scenario you can only activate Strike on IPs effect and you cant activate either Judgement nor Strike on the Link Summon because:
Since the effect is Chain Link 2 and the Link Summon is done immediatly after IPS effect, your own Chain Link 1 card (this case Raigeki) is chainblocking you and causing you to miss the timing on Judgment, thats why you can only use Strike on the effect activation of IP
Zura ja nai Sephiroth da thank you, I figured it may also help someone else to see a play by play description
Thank you for giving this info
MST.TV another quick question
Can I use test panther + another GB monster to make GB Dragases by making test panther go from 2-link rating to 1-link and therefore also making it count as one of the materials needed? Or because GB Dragases is a specific 2 GB monsters this can’t work?
You're correct in where you state that "because GB Dragases is a specific 2 GB monsters this can’t work". Dragases will always have to have 2 Glad beast monsters to be link summoned, which is actually one of it's biggest drawbacks, unfortunately.
Please tell what the interaction is between the unchained monsters effect of using opponents monster as link materials, and a monster that is "unaffected by other card effects" (masterpiece, ultimate raidfalcon etc). Can those monsters be used as link materials via the effect of the unchained monsters ??
I do believe it works as material like xyz monsters, so since material isn’t affected by monster effects just used as materials I think it would work, but it might jot work like xyz, and if it doesn’t then I might be 100% wrong.
Can I ask if your opponent specials one can the kaiju your winda afterwards as I lost a game to this in a predaplant shaddoll v crusadia match
Are you asking can you revive winda if kaijued?
@@Yugiohdeckmaster41 no if they have no specials left but kaijus tribute for cost then summon can they attempt to special
No they cannot. They have to Kaiju your Winda first or else they already used their Special summon.
No they can't
@@MSTTV thanks so much for the ruling I never thought of you seeing it but thanks again
New player here this was very helpful
Do you get rejection eff of of rescue Rabbit?
Bro I started building GB stuff but it’s so hard to find the cards without buying them online lol
@MST.TV Red Reboot vs Orcust Crescendo
Orcust Crescendo in the GY, activated to grab a monster. Red Reboot to negate. Does the banished Crescendo get set on the field?
Cannot negate the grave effect of orcust crescendo.
Negate trap card activations, not trap effects.
I am currently q small tier 2 judge and I'm curious about chain link order if there is a chain link 3 going on and the chain link three resolves and next is two am I allowed to respond to it with an effect negation or would it have to br the first monster in the chain link order
If a chain is resolving there is no response timing during the resolution.
You can only respond when the chain is building
Short answer: You can only respond to the last action on a building chain (following the rule of letting your opponent add a chain link in response to your action). So for an effect negation you either have to respond immediately to the effect (ex. Solemn Strike), or in the current chain (before it starts to resolve) activate a card like Infinite Imperm/ Effect Veiler/ Lost Wind (for a monster negate).
Only continuous effects may apply between chain links of a resolving chain.
For example you have Thunder Dragon Colossus with no thunders in GY, and a set Burial from a different dimension. Your opponent's looks at your GY, then activates Raigeki. You then chain BFADD, targeting a banished thunder monster. During resolution, the thunder monster is RETURNED to GY, then Raigeki resolves trying to destroy the Colossus. But Colossus's continuous effect lets it banish the returned thunder to avoid destruction if its owner wants it.
An other example letting you affect something in the middle of a resolving chain is the following:
At the start of your 3rd turn, you activate a monster trigger effect (E-HERO stratos search effect), then chain a quickplay spell like Mystik Wok (tribute as cost to gain LP equal to ATK), then chain Call of the Haunted targeting your monster (now in GY), while your opponent has a Spellcaster and Magician's right hand face up on their field.
Your trap will resolve properly, special summoning the tributed Stratos, Magician's Right hand will not allow Wok to resolve, then at last you get the search from Stratos. (also the "new" stratos will miss it's timing to activate again)
An other example showing how powerful continuous effects are:
You have 1 card in your hand, a "The Fabled Unicore" and a set "Twin Twisters" on the field. Your opponent has "Orcust Babel", "Longirsu" pointing at your "Unicore", a set "Crescendo" , and no cards in their hand.
They try to activate "Longirsu" to get rid of your monster, then you chain "Twin Twisters" discarding your last card and making your hands equal, then they chain the set "Crescendo" to negate your "Twins".
"Crescendo" will try to resolve but now your "Unicore"'s condition has been fulfiled, so their counter-trap is negated and destroyed, your "Twins" will resolve destroying the remaining "Babel", then the effect of "Longirsu" will be negated and "Unicore" will try to destroy it, but Longirsu's continuous effect that protects it from destruction will let it stay on the field, as only activations are negated, not other effects (unlike skill drain, white howling etc that negate entire effects across the field)
Hope it helps
So when considering the materials needed to summon Avramax ( 2+ monster from the extra deck ) would pendulum monsters that were pendulum summoned from the extra deck be appropriate materials?
yes
@@djvroku Thank you
RULINGS QUESTION
If I control predaplant tryph. on my side of the field and my opponent attempts an instant fusion summon of relinquished, am I able to negate the summon and destroy before hes able to use it's effectto steal my monster ??
As far as I can see, yes, triph is a quick effect so technically thousand eyes restrict would never actually hit the field
@@DeityLink540 thanks ! I thought I was right, but my opponent ensured me I had to negate the instant fusion card effect itself. I ended up losing that duel after I superpolyed his full orcust board
How are we still making shark cannon missplays
Mainly because People forget how Kagari was summoned because it is a monster that can be summoned properly and improperly
What happens when I activate Nekroz Of Trishula as chain link 1 and in chain link 2 my opponent discards their entire had, does Trishula get its effect?
No. Must banish exactly 3
Can you explain some rules of handtraps that need to be discarded and hit the gy vs the new Tenyi syncro monster?
@Charmiskit More about Ogre and Velier, since they both have in their text that part thay say GY, so if her effect is activated and Berserker is activated in chain banishing him, dont it prevent from hitting the GY therefore hitting a part of their effect?
@@ketsura3618 I think you're thinking of a situation where there is a blanket banishing effect on the field.
Dark law is a perfect example of stopping ogre and veiler because they can't reach the graveyard in the first place. Berserker banishes them as the next chain link and they're already in the grave so the effect still goes through.
They discard as cost so they hit the graveyard immediately after chaining to something. It's the reason why called by the grave can hit the ghost girls and veiler.
So under the second scenario with IP you would have to negate her affect vs negate the summon?
Something like that.
Wait how do you make ip’s effect chain link 2 what’s it chaining to ?
Say raigeki
Scenario: Player 1 shotgun Lancea, Player 2 chain Dimension Shifter. Witch lingering effect stay? At my local they said Lancea.
Lancea, somehow in Yu-Gi-Oh prevention effects takes precedent over changes effects
MST.TV Ook so the ruling was right. Thank Mr. TomBox.
Btw this just happens to me on YGOPro.
I activate allure of darkness and they chain Lancea. Apparently I get too draw the 2 cards and don’t banish anything. Free draw 2. Is this the right ruling or YGOPro was wrong?
@@Phoester yes it is correct. They just show u a dark and that's that.
U cannot allure under lancea but if lancea was chained it's now pot of greed if u can show a dark
MST.TV Nice!! Thank you very much. Really appreciate what you are doing for the community with this rulings videos. Keep it up sir!!
Could you provide a more solid example on how I:P Masquerena's effect could Chain Block being Solemn Judgment? I just don't even see what other effects you could Chain into while trying to use her effect that would make any sense? These videos of misplays of yours are great but it would be even better if you could maybe showcase, demonstrate with actual cards on the screen what people are doing wrong rather than just talk about it. Would be more helpful in clarification of certain misplays and would make the these videos a lot more interesting to watch as well. Thanks!
There is no chain blocking with IP .. as long as she is chain link 2 or higher, the monster summoned cannot be solemn judgment.
@@MSTTV Why is that? Is it because if you have multiple of your own cards in a chain you can change the order in which they resolve?
Azaizer If it’s CL2 then when you Link Summon you still have to resolve the CL1 (you or your opponent) after in order to finish resolving the chain. That way, the summon is still inside the resolution of the chain, and you cannot activate a card or effect during a resolution.
@@Joerisama well I still couldn't make sense of it and just found this under the rulings of how/when you can use Solemn Judgment - The effects of "Thunder King Rai-Oh", "Black Horn of Heaven", "Solemn Judgment", and similar cards can only be activated when a monster Special Summons itself without starting a Chain, such as when a Special Summon monster Special Summons itself.
My next question is, if you activate Masquerena only, can your opponent then Chain Solemn Judgment to destroy Masquerena itself due to it's effect to Link Summon from the Extra deck? Or do they have to wait for Masquerena's effect to resolve FIRST and then they can attempt to Solemn Judgment whatever was SS from the Extra Deck and then negate that monster's summoning?
Azaizer second option, Judgment only activates against the summon, not against the activation of a monster effect.
Thanks!! 😎👍💥
I don’t understand the sky striker one still
If u use Raye's effect to summon out Kagari.. it isn't a link summon therefore it is improperly summoned, so it cannot be special summoned from the graveyard
Therefore if someone uses shark cannon and target her, she must be banished because u cannot special summon her from grave as she wasn't summoned properly.
You have to remember she wasn't summoned properly which something people's constantly forget and sometimes people use hiita to attempt special summon her.
MST.TV bc the actual wording on rayes quick effect says special summon not link summon?!?! Holy crap I never thought about that or even realized it . (Booooooooooooooom)
Its weird bc if someone tried to
Monster reborn a fusion monster or something outta they grave that they didn’t fusion summon properly I would notice. I can’t even begin to think how many times it’s completely blown past me with link monsters
@@lewisrussell3645 they just have to be properly summoned based off fusion summon Or by their own summoning condition but if it was summoned via neither... Then that summon is illegal.
Imma say it: most of the illegal plays are not intentional. So don't be mad when at locals someone "cheats"
Hmm GBs with bownty?
Interest choice
@@MSTTV yeah I looked at bownty and said to myself, this is a good card but how can I make the best use of it and then I thought of gbs. The fact that you can get a war chariot to load up for next turn sounded crazy to me
So glad beasts are fun, right? Looking into getting the deck... Idk
My going 2nd gb profile coming.
I fee most of these are read the cards boiis but still informative
I need GB stuff for fire fists lol
GB Stuff!!! Need 👀
Dabudabudabudabu !!!!!
Free GB stuff? Im broke. I hope i can get some :)
Tombox itself is now a jojo referance
HA. Get recked gladiator
Yo
Yo
@@MSTTV you said leave a comment lol