วีดีโอ

WHEN JESUS COMES BACK AS KING JESUS ALL THE WORLD WILL SEE HIM

In case you were wondering, we don't still live in the times of the Didache. A lot has happened.

Futurists: "you gotta be fully future" Hyper Preterists: "you gotta be fully past" Me: "NO" Both full pret and full future make similar exegeticall mistakes. I reject your false dilemma. We can have a judgment coming in 70AD and an actual cloud return at the closing of time. You've no idea how to properly interpret apocalyptic literature just like the heretics. Funnily enough, this Didache cherry pick is agnostic of a litteral millennium 🤔 (there isn't one)

The history of the church doesn't determine truth. Wow, that is profound.

Full Preterism belongs to a different religion. The whole thrust and the hope we have as believers in Christ is layed out in 1 Thessalonians. The hope of His glorious appearing and He taking His bride away from the earth.

Not everything Preterists say is false and not everything is fulfilled in 70 AD.

The Didache is a development over centuries some of it is early sure but surely not by Apostolic hands. Who knows who added or subtracted from it, wrangled it, distorted it to favor the lie.

God is in control but allows Satan to do his thing. Until the *literal* Return of Yahshua/Jesus Christ - Satan rules this planet. This is Satan's world (Luke 4:5-8, 2 Corinthians 4:4) - anyone who attains high prestige or Political Power prior to the ACTUAL - Physical - *Second Coming* of Christ belongs to Satan, and he's hell bent on bringinging "Peace" and "Unity" on HIS TERMS.

Preterism is a lie. Revelation is yet (near) future and the sooner preterists realise that the better. They simply don't have the Holy Spirit in their lives. Not the LORD but a *lordly intellect* rules their roost.

You try to differentiate David s throne from his father's throne. Matthew 25 he sits upon the throne of his glory. Which throne is that?

Luke 19. They thought the kingdom would appear immediately. A nobleman went to a far country to receive a kingdom and to RETURN. Gave money to do business "till I come". They did business for 40 years and were rewarded. But those enemies who did not want Him to reign over them ( Jews apposed to Christ) were slayn before Him .....70 ad.

Jesus was King of the Jews when he was born. His life, death, resurrection and his working with the apostles till they died is evident of his kingship over Israel. His coming in 70ad. was evidence of the fact that he was given all authority in heaven and earth.

Jesus Christ fulfilled the law and the prophets. Everything is fulfilled now.

Jesus returned in 70 AD to judge Jerusalem. He will also return in the future to judge the world. It doesn't have to be one or the other - it's both. And the Didache does not necessarily disagree with that.

Acts 2:30-32 Peter said that the resurrection is proof of the fulfillment of the promise to David......Christ IS seated on David's throne.

As Meyer said Futurism only took hold when that generation passed without material evidence of Jesus, even though they were told not to look. Have faith, don't look.

What Durban said is entirely correct. What you believe is entirely false.

The only temple that exists now is the Messianic temple.....built without hands

As a Praeterist John's gospel is our witness of the second coming. My video 'Antichrist is coming? or did John tarry til he come? #25 Myths in so-called Christianity'.

As preterists, our back is not against the wall. There will be no future temple..... you are mistaken. So is this "so called" future temple in Rev.11 going to be trampled by the gentiles?

There is a problem mentioning the existence of the temple after 70ad...... because it didn't exist. John in Revelation doesn't mention the most astounding political event in the first century as in the past, because he wrote in 65-68ad......prior to the Jewish war with Rome

Gentry's connection between Luke 21 and Rev.11 is plain and clear, as is the full preterist understanding.

Your "standard" or analogy of Monopoly is a distraction from the truth. We full preterists don't need a "get out of jail card". Nor do we need a selling point. Returning to early church literature is not outlawed, but it is not inspired. Stick with the scripture.

We care about scripture, not what the early church taught. Scripture clearly states facts which already occurred almost 2000 years ago. Jesus was the greatest prophet. Ignore that and you ignore scripture.

Very insightful. Interesting how no preterism showed up until around the 1600-1700s. That's pretty similar to argument preterists often use about dispensationalism being so supposedly recent. At least dispys do have early quotes of believers being rescued or removed from the tribulation. Preterists have the exact opposite. It's full of futurists. One would assume the early church fathers would all have been united in their preterism having lived through or shortly after the 70ad events. Fun idea for another video, explain how all the systems are actually pretty close in age to each other (all are post reformation systems), like covenant theology, dispensationalism, post millennialism, preterism, theonomy, historic premil, etc. I find it amazing how often the theonomist will criticize the dispys for being young and their system is noted for beginning in the 1800s.

Tribulation had begun by the time that Jerusalem was surrounded by armies (per Matthew 24:15-21 and Luke 21:20-21) in 66-70 A.D., under Nero's first general persecution, however that tribulation (the persecution of Christians) has not yet ended. The understanding of tribulation is not correctly grasped by either the Preterist or Futurist view, as both were propagated by agents of the antichrist to hide his identity. It is only understood by the Historicist view which the antichrist sought to dismiss when he was revealed during the reformation.

Would not people have missed it because they expected Jesus to come sit on a literal earthly throne - instead of sitting at the right hand of the father?

It sounds like the Didache was written with the assumption that these things must soon take place.

It sounds like the Didache was written with the assumption that these things must soon take place.

th-cam.com/video/EE0uNqkz2R0/w-d-xo.html

The word for coming in Mt.24:3 from the Strong's lexicon. Παρουσία, parousia, par-oo-see'-ah From the present participle of G3918; a being near, that is, advent (often, return; specifically of Christ to punish Jerusalem, or finally the wicked); (by implication) physical aspect: - coming, presence.

Please read these verses (Mt.28:16-17, Mk.16:10-11, Lu.18:31-34, 24:9-11, Jn.13:33, 36, 14:4, 20:3-9, Ac.1:6), then ask yourself, did the apostles really understand Jesus was going to return in our future and that's what they asked Him about in Mt.24:3.

Ooops, you made a big mistake right off the bat: Matthew 24 29 *Immediately after the tribulation* of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: 30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. The Great Throne Judgement is part of the Great Tribulation, which is under seal/trumpet/vial 6. Verse 29 says *”immediately after the Tribulation”.* This means verses 29, 30, and 31 are seal/trumpet/vial 7 which is the beginning of New Heavens and New Earth. *_You are trying to change the timeline of the Resurrection /Throne Judgement by putting it under Trumpet 7 when it actually occurred under trumpet 6._* Furthermore, Revelation 19 is also the beginnings of New Heaven and New Earth. Revelation 20 is a *synopsis* of prior fulfilled events.

For the full time of your faith will be of no benefit to you unless you are found perfect at the final moment that is a very scary verse I really don't like it it doesn't sit well with me it's because of Jesus's righteousness that is imputed to me that I have been found righteous and perfect in God's eyes and I am justified buy my faith alone, what is this verse even implying? It's making it seem as if my faith is not good enough unless I found perfect at the final moment as if it's saying I could screw up and lose my salvation?

You think the Didache is a problem, try (long form) ..of 'The Constitutions of The Holy Apostles' rediscovered by William Whiston who originally put in to print Josephus. It's in the 4th or 5th vol. of his 'Primitive Christianity Revived' BUT IS a Greek/Latin version of the Didache possibly in much better condition as far as retaining the original text. Look into it ..William Whiston sacrificed his entire career on getting it published, and the theological world pretends it doesn't exist. Total fire Truth Bomb.

The fatal flaw of futurism is audience relevance.

God bless anyone seeking the truth! It does not matter if Heiser is right or not it matters if the Bible is right. Looking at the overall picture you can see who is right. Stop reading from your own traditional interpretation and read it as it is written. This way we can be blessed. If we come with statements like : "this is what it means" probably we can have as many Judeo-Christian faiths as inhabitants on this earth. Read it as it is written, most and foremost , and when it can't apply this rule then apply to other rules that can give us light about the meaning. God is not a God of confusion but of clarity to give Salvation and wisdom to those who seek Him!

AD70 was future to all the writings of Paul and the apostles. No, the Didache doesn’t have to be written prior to 70AD. In fact ithe text shows they used Pauline letters and Mathew etc to write the Didache. As in every other apocalypse text,(Isaiah etc) they used dramatic language to tell of the destruction of a people or a city. Imagine you could ask the 1st century believers, ‘if you are expecting the destruction of the Jewish system to be in the future, what then was the destruction in AD70.?’ You can’t throw out such devastation for your hope for some event over 2000 years in the future. The Kingdom comes without observation and Jesus said He goes to prepare a place that where He is you can come to be with Him. The whole idea of a physical future kingdom on earth is a deception to promote continual war and death

Last night, Aussie time,over dinner I was explaining the failures of Preterism, Amillenialism and Post-mill.

"Consistent" is probably the most important word in eschatology. Every Bible student should know how to spell it and apply it. Even if you start out a bit wrong, you will self correct over time. This program equipped me to answer a friend who is a preterist. I knew of the Didache, but didn't know those phrases. 👍

excellent again!!

How important might it be that some prophecy be about the House of Israel (lost after Assyrian captivity 722 BC never to return - yet) and the House of Judah (taken in Babylonian captivity 538 BC but did return after 70 yrs). No need for allegory. In other words does every mention of Israel mean Jewish or Jew when we know there were two houses, two kingdoms, and the two sticks would be united (yet future?)

Yes. All of the NT writers were looking for the Messiah Jesus' return and the restoration of all things in the future.

“it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out of the mouth; this defiles a person.”” ‭‭Matthew‬ ‭15‬:‭11‬ ‭ESV‬‬ “You blind guides, straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel!” ‭‭Matthew‬ ‭23‬:‭24‬ ‭ESV‬‬

The idea of a future bodily return of Christ to Earth is ridiculous. Seriously folks, think it out.

Looking forward to watching this! Should be interesting

It’s sad that many believe Hamas is an organic Palestinian organization. Hamas is an IDF/Mossad creation, just like ISIS/Al-Quaeda are CIA/US creation. They are designed as psyop to justify US military force to pave the way for “the greater Israel project“ which we are currently witnessing today. It is controlled by the synagogue of Satan.

I grew up in the dispy ocean. Didn’t even know there were options. But then I started reading the Bible and not just “studying” it. Next thing you know I just couldn’t believe Mathew 24 was talking about a different generation. For the first time I wondered how long dispensationalism had been around? I left dispy before landing on anything else. I’m still open to other eschatologies but Dispy is about as antichrist as I can imagine. All that to say, for the last year another thought about dispy had been eating at me, at first I thought nooo! But the more I read the more it seemed likely. Well this video really cemented it for me. That thought is that didpys are the modern day Judaizers. Unlike the original Judaizers trying to mix them you simply say they are both Gods plan and teach people to accept it. How similar are you to the Pharisees? Let me count the ways. 1. You both believe that Jesus would/will come defeat your enemies and establish an earthly kingdom. 2. You both believe your identity is what saves you. Of course you would deny that many of your adherents preach the gospel of the rapture rather than the real gospel. You tell people to join team Jesus so you don’t get left behind. Of course you tel them to be repentant and mean it but their motivation was clearly rapture insurance. Here is what else is interesting - because of this Jesus told the Pharisees the world was I. The bad shape it was because they were not properly discipling the world. IE culture is down stream from Christianity. So for 100+ years you guys have been saying just say this prayer and mean it in your heart and presto change your a Christian. Sound familiar to something downstream in our culture? Just because you’re a male in reality just believe it in your heart that you are female and presto chango you’re a female. One thing you didn’t address in this video was this- your teaching requires a 3rd temple. In part do the antichrist can do something so awful it makes God have to leave the temple. Please explain what on earth God would find more offensive than this temple? I can’t imagine a bigger middle finger to Jesus than a temple. And you actually think God will take up residence in it?

I can’t figure out why we worry about what the Didache says

Another logical gap for preterists seems to be Luke's connection of Christ's ascension and return with clouds. The Greek seems to indicate that a cloud took him up and a way out of their sight, καὶ νεφέλη ὑπέλαβεν αὐτὸν ἀπὸ τῶν ὀφθαλμῶν αὐτῶν. Later the angels told the apostles that Jesus would return in the same way he was taken up. That limits the return method of Christ to something literal and not figurative, as is interpreted by some. N.T. Wright's historical-critical approach to Paul's 1 Thessalonians 4 dialogue about being caught up into the clouds in the air as somehow being a mention of going out to meet the emperor also seems to miss these other details that Paul would have taught.