วีดีโอ

Amazing! Can’t wait for soft dramatic 🫶

This is so helpful! And I don't mind watching all the other types although I'm looking forward especially to the classic types 🙂 I'm also curious if the actress Romy Schneider would fall into one of the classic types. She tried a variety of styles throughout her life, but I think she looked the most gorgeous in classic, minimalistic and elegant lines, no patterns, but with hints of dramatic details. She also reminds me a bit of Marion Cotillard who is a soft classic.

Hi, i am really tied between Theatrical romantic, flamboyant gamine, soft natural, soft gamine, and romantic. I especially think i could be romantic or soft natural, i meet most of the criteria. The only problem is my feet are somewhat big in proportion to my height and my shoulders are slightly more angular, they sound very similar to the soft gamine shoulders. Not rounded and slightly broad. (Although people don't notice and am regarded as smallish. ) These things are the only things that have stopped me from claiming romantic. My large feet and slightly angular shoulders make me feel i am FG, but when i look up their descriptions i feel i have very little in common with FG.

have been waiting for this video, thank you!!

when you do the flamboyant natural please also do comparison within the Natural family. it’s different for men but I could love to hear your comparison of their essences and physicality

I agree with what you said about dramatics have possible some curves,(like a small waist) one of the biggest misconceptions is that dramatics are literal straight 📱,when in reality, they just don't have soo much curves that are pronounced and need to be accomodated;I've seen someone questioning why Taylor swift is not a Soft dramatic because she has curves and some flesh;but,not all dramatics are just bones and skin,they are women in the end of the day😅. Thanks for the video.

A good textbook example of a dramatic is Mina Zibayi,she has a channel here on TH-cam, does makeup tutorials in short vídeos, and just with her face alone you can see the sunken cheeks,defined jawline,big almond--roundish eyes,intense gaze and dignified aura. If someone has a dramatic face, I would recommend her channel!! Ephasize contour or her lips with lipliner,use contour to frame her face,and use dramatic eyelashes with all over eyeliner!!

This is all still confusing. Each person seems to have a different explanation

I agree with you

Normal/Average people examples would be better for this. Celebrities are all generally really attractive, so most hairstyles can seemingly look good. Halle Berry would literally still be stunningly beautiful bald lol.

Thank you thank you thank you !!!!

Do you think that someone like Barbara Palvin has width? My upper body and general proportions are very similar to hers, I just have slightly larger hips and I'm 2 cm shorter than her, so I have a hard time determining my type... ;(

here is me thinking she is a romantic 😅

This helped *so* much and clarified I do have curve! Now I've just got to go figure out the other categories.

I still don't understand without comparisons to narrow shoulders. Don't bodies naturally flare out to shoulders on everyone? Even on a confirmed types like Romantics I still see the line going out so the more videos I watch the more confused I get.

Could we have a guide for soft natural like when you have to accommodate width and a short vertical line too.

Thank you for this video, this was helpful to me.

بارك الله فيكم على هذي المبادرة

Well done again! I “flare out” in many places on my body. I thought I was a soft gamine or theatrical romantic for a long time or even a soft classic. But my nose, my shoulders, my breasts feet and hips all FLARE. I’m a curvy trapezoid. It was confusing for so long because I’m short but it makes sense because I’m athletic with extra padding aka romance

It would be helpful to also compare and contrast with those who don’t have width, as it just seems that most people have a thinner waist and therefore some width to their upper body? Or is it just more to the upper than lower body?

I think a video with people with vs without width would be helpful

I agree except Emilia. The flesh is what gives her width

I guess Elizabeth Taylor typed officially as romantic is in fact soft natural. What do you think?

This really helped clarify things for me. Thank you!

With this I confirm my ID, I am currently losing weight and in reality the size of the tops has not changed (I sewed adjustments only in the lower part, I adjusted curve and width without realizing it 😅), I was confused because I have never been angular but yes I am wide boned and very short, thank you very much

Welcome back ❤✨

❤✨

It's hard to tell when you are overweight. Like Selena Gomez people use to think she 's soft naturel

Hello. You mentioned your Instagram page again, however it still has doesn't appear to have any posts.

Zendaya is a really contentious one! I can see the argument for FN, but I don't know - I feel like her essence aligns much more with "regal lady". Could be a fun video topic!

Great video! Definitely proved to me that I am My least favorite kibbe body type lol

Your videos are hands down the best about the Kibbe system! I completely agree about "width" not being a neutral word, a lot of us don't want to have width when thinness is the beauty standard, that can definitely mess with how we understand the system.

Awesome video! I didn’t think you could make it any easier, but you did! I think a lot of people in these groups really just want to make their own idea about the kibbe system because they don’t understand it. Causes loads of confusion. Also as a FN myself I can assure you that fast fashion does not seem to be making clothing much wider, lol 😂

I swore i was sg or a curvy fg like Jennifer love Hewitt because of my short height. But i couldn't ignore my width it was obvious standing next to true gamines that i was not one. I was an obvious sn

Agree wholeheartedly with your typing of Zendaya, Emilia and Florence. When you see it, you see it. Now if I could only do that with myself lol Thank you so much for your videos. It's hard to get a grasp on the system with just words on forums.

Hi, I have a question about the Scarlett Johansson image at 2:15. To me, of all the images in the video, this one stands out as showing the least width. However, I know she is a SN and I see her chest/shoulder bluntness in most other pictures of her. Does that suggest I'm misunderstanding width/horizontal? Is there something about her horizontal that is a little different or more subtle in the 2:15 image? I'm trying to be intuitive, but it feels like my intuition is failing here.

I have only ever seen Emlia Clarke described as a romantic.

I thought your previous video on width was so easy to understand 🤔 I am surprised people don't see it yet...then again I am very familiar with clothes I am so grateful for your videos Thank you

Do you see Emilia Clarke being a potential Romantic instead? I know people tend to mix them up since Soft Natural has a Romantic essence

I think what just did it for me was you using the words “flare out”. something about that helped me tap into the intuitive. Because I feel like I naturally feel that “flaring out” in my body when I move and walk and wear certain clothes. As long as I’m not overthinking and just focusing on what feels accurate. The thing you said about modern/fast fashion clothing is brilliant because it naturally has more stretch from the sides. And if remember correctly when I actually wore non-stretch fabrics like blazers or blouses I always needed movement in my arms/shoulders and would have to size up even though everything else fit perfectly. But if it’s “loose” (1-2cm away from my body) than it fit just fine and I wouldn’t need to size up even with no stretch. Something I have also not seen mentioned before all in one video are the different TYPES of width one may have. Mine in less in my ribcage/chest and more in my shoulder socket itself and armpits. But if I were just looking pictures of myself it’s harder to see because I’m over analyzing and looking for obvious width “poking” or sticking out of my body like the wide shoulders etc

3:20 I don't have obvious width and I appear small to some people but David agreed that my line sketch shows Kibbe width + curve .... I also definitely feel the width when I put on tighter outfits or outfits that are simply closer to my body where my shoulders are caught in the fabric and it just feels uncomfortable .......

this is so wonderful. I can't wait for the rest of the series!

I love your videos😺

❤

My god you are the Kibbe whisperer! So on point.

I'm SO excited to see the Soft Dramatic video! You typed me as SD last year and nothing has been more accurate.

What is interesting is that this Victoria's Secret model is in a bent leg stance, beside Rihanna. Since you suggested that Rihanna appears to be close to the model's height, I wonder if that is a bit of an illusion, as the VS model's legs are in fact bent, whilst the singer's legs are clearly straightened.