- 36
- 336 119
The GT350 Garage
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 14 มิ.ย. 2020
Welcome to The GT350 Garage! I've spent the majority of my 30+ year automotive career restoring and modifying cars (and trucks) for other people. Now I'm sharing that knowledge and experience as I document my 1966 Shelby GT350 Mustang project (and more) with you!
SUBSCRIBE for:
- ORIGINAL CONTENT following the progress of my 1966 Shelby GT350 project!
- UNBIASED REVIEWS of products that you won't get from retailers or sponsored channels!
- TECHNICAL INFO that brings vintage cars into the modern age!
- KNOWLEDGE that support the technical information in my videos!
- GUIDANCE processes for difficult jobs to make them easier to do yourself!
- PASSION for the the hobby and the joy it brings us to drive the cars (and trucks) we build!
SUBSCRIBE for:
- ORIGINAL CONTENT following the progress of my 1966 Shelby GT350 project!
- UNBIASED REVIEWS of products that you won't get from retailers or sponsored channels!
- TECHNICAL INFO that brings vintage cars into the modern age!
- KNOWLEDGE that support the technical information in my videos!
- GUIDANCE processes for difficult jobs to make them easier to do yourself!
- PASSION for the the hobby and the joy it brings us to drive the cars (and trucks) we build!
Controversial Topic: Flat Tappet Cams (Solid & Hydraulic) are FINE!
About 25 years ago the industry experienced an epidemic of cam failures from changes to the formulation of engine oil. We addressed that issue and the problems subsided. Recently though, cam failures are back there have been plenty of fingers pointing at the cam manufacturers blaming them for using low quality cam cores and lifters, and for an overall lack of quality control.
This video addresses the failures and the supposed causes, but I’m sharing with you the three things I’ve observed that have drastically changed and the reasons why they are more likely the real root causes of cam failures since 2020.
#TheGT350Garage #289 #302 #Ford #Mustang #shelbygt350 #engine #camshaft #failure #lifter #breakin #valvespring #enginefailure #camshaftfailure #lifterfailure
This video addresses the failures and the supposed causes, but I’m sharing with you the three things I’ve observed that have drastically changed and the reasons why they are more likely the real root causes of cam failures since 2020.
#TheGT350Garage #289 #302 #Ford #Mustang #shelbygt350 #engine #camshaft #failure #lifter #breakin #valvespring #enginefailure #camshaftfailure #lifterfailure
มุมมอง: 4 738
วีดีโอ
How To Build A 480+Horsepower 289 Ford V8 - Part 1: Required Machine Work & Block Prep
มุมมอง 13K14 วันที่ผ่านมา
How To Build A 480 Horsepower 289 Ford V8 - Part 1: Required Machine Work & Block Prep
How To Fit A 245 Width Tire On A 65-66 Shelby GT350 Mustang With Stock Front Fenders
มุมมอง 2.7K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
This is a setup video where I explain the combination of parts used on my ‘66 Shelby GT350 to achieve a very high performance suspension system that looks incredibly stock. The alignment capabilities of this setup are far beyond the range of what was possible even for the Shelby GT350 R-Models and rival the best vintage race cars and pro-touring builds alike. Watch along as I discuss how I brou...
How To Tune & Use: Pump Gas, Race Gas, & E85 In Your Street High Performance Engine
มุมมอง 8Kปีที่แล้ว
How To Tune & Use: Pump Gas, Race Gas, & E85 In Your Street High Performance Engine Building on the concept of my High Compression Tuning Video from 2022, I take a look at fuel testing results from an Engine Masters video from last year and share my in-depth knowledge of why their results happened the way they did. I share more insight on how modern fuel works, and how it needs to be used. Here...
289-351W Ford Cylinder Head Setup & Assembly
มุมมอง 10Kปีที่แล้ว
Assembling your own cylinder heads isn’t difficult with some basic tools and a little knowledge. I show the process to check installed height at the retainer, check pressure at the installed height and explain how to calculate open pressure. Thanks for watching! If you enjoyed the video, Please: - Like - Subscribe - Turn On Notifications - Share Follow me on Instagram: gt350_6s_15...
How To Make Perfect Double Flares Every Time, Even Using Stainless!
มุมมอง 27K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Making a good double flare in a brake line can be frustrating, it’s a challenge. Galvanized and Nickel Copper rare challenge enough for most, and Stainless is an additional level of difficulty. In this video I jump right into double flaring Stainless and show how you can get perfect ready to assemble double flares every time, and in just a couple minutes! Thanks for watching! If you enjoyed the...
Update: After Crazy Problems, Finally Back In The Garage
มุมมอง 1.2K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Update: After Crazy Problems, Finally Back In The Garage Outsourcing anything to anyone these days can be risky. Find out what happened to my block and rotating assembly and more in this update. Thanks for watching! If you enjoyed the video, Please: - Like - Subscribe - Turn On Notifications - Share Follow me on Instagram: gt350_6s_1523 - @GT350_6S_1523 Like and Follow on Faceboo...
Porting TFS Twisted Wedge 170 Small Block Ford Heads w/ Raised Intake & Exhaust Ports For My Shelby
มุมมอง 4.3K2 ปีที่แล้ว
This is an early progress video to show the roughed in ports on my TFS Twisted Wedge 170 Heads for the 289 I’m building to put in my 1966 Shelby GT350. In order to reach my power goals, these heads require extensive work, but the finished product will hopefully contribute to the engine meeting or exceeding the goal of matching the modern GT350’s 100hp/liter power output. Take a look to see the ...
The GT350 Garage Update, Shelby Progress, Engine Info, Weather & Garden Chores, and I had the Rona
มุมมอง 3842 ปีที่แล้ว
Yeah, this one is short, and shows a little bit of the chaos I’ve been experiencing. No fancy title cards, just an honest update.
How To Tune For 10.5-12.5:1 Compression & 91-93 Octane Pump Gas Without Losing Horsepower or Torque!
มุมมอง 77K2 ปีที่แล้ว
How To Tune For 10.5-12.5:1 Compression & 91-93 Octane Pump Gas Without Losing Horsepower or Torque! This is a controversial topic with performance enthusiasts because there is so much bad information out there on the subject. I’ve put together this video using information I have personally used with tremendous success for the past 20 years. The information in this video has been tested and ver...
How To: Remove & Replace A '65 to Early-'67 Mustang Steering Gear Box
มุมมอง 22K2 ปีที่แล้ว
The original steering box on my 1966 Shelby GT350 has pushed all of the grease out the end and the plug is missing. But more importantly, it was severely worn and had excessive play in the box. I'll be retaining the original part as I am with all of the original parts I'm upgrading on the car, and if I (or a future owner decades from now) want to restore the car with all of it's correct parts, ...
Easy DIY Performance Re-Curve: '57-87 Ford V8 Distributors - Tune Your Ignition Timing
มุมมอง 40K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Everything you need to know to re-curve your 1957-1987 Ford V8 single point, dual point, or Duraspark distributor’s mechanical and vacuum advance mechanism. Tuning your ignition timing is critical to how your engine operates. You don’t need to spend hundreds of dollars on an aftermarket distributor or programmable ignition box to be able to adjust the timing curve your engine needs to provide m...
How To Select High Performance Intake Manifolds
มุมมอง 3.3K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Just like selecting the right carburetor is a challenge, so is selecting the right intake manifold. Again, I’m not here to sell you anything! So here’s the criteria I use to choose an intake manifold, mostly this is where you need to be honest with yourself things: - What is more important, appearance or performance? - How much power will it really make? - What RPM will it make peak horsepower?...
Step By Step Rear Axle Bearing Replacement
มุมมอง 5K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Step By Step Rear Axle Bearing Replacement
My 1966 Shelby GT350 Project: Progress Made and Problems Found
มุมมอง 7372 ปีที่แล้ว
My 1966 Shelby GT350 Project: Progress Made and Problems Found
Replace a ‘66 Shelby GT350 (Mustang) Engine to Gauge Feed Harness W/ Scott Drake P/N C6ZZ-14289-8
มุมมอง 8052 ปีที่แล้ว
Replace a ‘66 Shelby GT350 (Mustang) Engine to Gauge Feed Harness W/ Scott Drake P/N C6ZZ-14289-8
My ‘66 Shelby GT350 289 HiPo engine failure’s cause, and how to avoid the same fate!
มุมมอง 3.8K2 ปีที่แล้ว
My ‘66 Shelby GT350 289 HiPo engine failure’s cause, and how to avoid the same fate!
1966 Shelby GT350 Engine Removal Part 4: One Man Engine Removal Process w/Tips & Tricks
มุมมอง 5383 ปีที่แล้ว
1966 Shelby GT350 Engine Removal Part 4: One Man Engine Removal Process w/Tips & Tricks
1966 Shelby GT350 Engine Removal Part 3: Transmission Removal Process
มุมมอง 3733 ปีที่แล้ว
1966 Shelby GT350 Engine Removal Part 3: Transmission Removal Process
1966 Shelby GT350 Engine Removal Part 2: Headers, Exhaust, & Clutch Linkage Removal
มุมมอง 4703 ปีที่แล้ว
1966 Shelby GT350 Engine Removal Part 2: Headers, Exhaust, & Clutch Linkage Removal
1966 Shelby GT350 Engine Removal Part 1: Cooling System, Engine Accessories, & Fuel System Removal
มุมมอง 5793 ปีที่แล้ว
1966 Shelby GT350 Engine Removal Part 1: Cooling System, Engine Accessories, & Fuel System Removal
Early Mustang Cooling Systems Part 6: Green Coolant Goes Bad, How & Why I Upgraded To An ELC!
มุมมอง 6K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Early Mustang Cooling Systems Part 6: Green Coolant Goes Bad, How & Why I Upgraded To An ELC!
Early Mustang Cooling Systems Part 5: How To Get Your Stock Gauges To Work Correctly And More!
มุมมอง 9K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Early Mustang Cooling Systems Part 5: How To Get Your Stock Gauges To Work Correctly And More!
How To Install Your ‘65-68 Mustang Heater Box Assembly (Step-By-Step w/Glove Box & Heater Hoses)
มุมมอง 6K3 ปีที่แล้ว
How To Install Your ‘65-68 Mustang Heater Box Assembly (Step-By-Step w/Glove Box & Heater Hoses)
‘65-68 Mustang Heater Core Install & Heater Box Assembly (Complete Step-By-Step Process)
มุมมอง 9K3 ปีที่แล้ว
‘65-68 Mustang Heater Core Install & Heater Box Assembly (Complete Step-By-Step Process)
How To Take Apart And Clean A ‘65-68 Mustang Heater Box Assembly
มุมมอง 4.4K3 ปีที่แล้ว
How To Take Apart And Clean A ‘65-68 Mustang Heater Box Assembly
Easy ‘65-68 Mustang Heater Box Removal for Heater Core or Heater Hose Replacement
มุมมอง 23K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Easy ‘65-68 Mustang Heater Box Removal for Heater Core or Heater Hose Replacement
Early Mustang Cooling Systems Part 4: Water Pump Tech, Iron vs Aluminum, Don’t Overlook The Bolts!
มุมมอง 6K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Early Mustang Cooling Systems Part 4: Water Pump Tech, Iron vs Aluminum, Don’t Overlook The Bolts!
Yeah I don't get it as we haven't lost any Flat Tappets either ? touch wood I guess ? We deal strictly with a Lifter Manufacturer.... we check Lobe Taper and Lifter Crown.... no problems so far ?
I genuinely believe a lot of the failures are self inflicted. It takes literally 15 minutes to precisely check every lobe on a cam and every lifter in a box and you don’t need a fancy crown gauge or any high end tools to verify them, a simple digital caliper will do nicely. Using the proper assembly lube, not too much, not too little, a good break in oil with a decent filter, and having proper technique for starting up and breaking in a cam and lifters takes minimal effort. Honestly the hardest part is understanding the valve spring pressure needs for the cam profile and valvetrain as a whole, and that is still not that hard to figure out, but definitely requires a higher understanding of the physics involved.
I have assembled and tested over 10000 engines in the past 35 years. Intial problems started with one manufacturer. Since, many have shifted to the same producers. All have bit it with the lifters. If you are not having issues, you are lucky. That simple. The stock piles of cams still remaining from 30 yrs ago, work fine. Those produced for comp,jegs,summit,speedway all had issues. The high demand profiles for middle performance power plants are scary. No issues with cams in direct replacement levels. As soon as you start increasing to lifts of .500. Or 235° duration. Your springs can't be used for break-in! If you are not checking the lifters...you will have issues. 6 out of 10 times flat tappets fail with bigger cams. 9 out of 10 times, it's the lifter that fails. This is not just in flat tappet. Hydrolic rollers are seeing the same issues. That debunks your break in procedure, or oil debate. From 2000- 2015, it was the highest selling models that failed. Smaller or less know cam distributors were still working with cams produced before 2000. Now in 2024, most of the flat tappet cams have been worked through and higher quality is being demanded from the cam cores themselves. Lifter are also improving. It was the reports from shops, distributors, and utube personalities that got it changed. For any build. Break in with a standard spring. Use assembly grease, NOT just high zinc oil. Hold at 2000 rpm immediately. At any moment it starts to alter timing. Yank the cam! Repeat the break in 3 times before installing final springs. Hold the engine at full temp for 20 minutes for each break in. You will find the problems in that time if there is any. Best to have a reputable shop do the break in. They have more negotiating power when the cam wipes out and destroys everything else. If you are not a shop with that ability. Solid tappet or roller is the only way to go. If you are working with a block from 50 years ago or from the junk yard. Have the lifter bores inspected. Most used blocks are worn out. You are one of few who haven't had the problem. Avoid all cams and lifters produced from 2000-2015. Especially those from comp,lunati, or the mainstream parts suppliers.
You need to look deeper in the comments, I’m far from one of a few not having problems, and most of use are doing things exactly the same way. Those of us not having failures aren’t pointing fingers at the far east, we’re methodical and taking a proactive approach of verifying the machining, then applying long established practices. In a high productivity shop working on anything and everything, time is money, machinists and engine builders get complacent, they turn on the “I’ve been doing this for DECADES” mentality and little steps get overlooked.
Absolutely Spot on advice and very pertinent and accurate information !! This is our experience to a tee! We have a test stand so our initial startup happens basically instantly as soon as we hit the start but! Engine is fully lubed prior to start Timing is verified with dampener and rotor position! Carb is filled and verified by pressure that it’s not blowing over the floats and flooding the motor!!! High moly lube paste is applied to cam and lifters! On non adjustable FE rockers, we ensure proper pushrod depression in lifter at one cylinder and the we assemble the whole set of rocker assemblies without ROTATING THE MOTOR! On adjustable, we use TDC positioning which will only be about .004 larger of lash as of setting by lobe position! ABSOLUTELY DO NOT ROTATE THE MOTOR BY MORE THEN 2 turns which is one full rotation on the camshaft. After break-in, you can then go over the rocker lash adjustment by the lobe method to get them totally dialed in to the proper lash, a few thousands extra lash will not have any adverse effect on cam/lifter break-in! We will add cleanliness as any foreign metal or sand debris that might find its way onto the can lobe or lifter 0:45 face during assembly can be ground into the lobe and you would not be able to see it or really feel it due to the heavy moly lube paste? BE VERY CKEAN AND WORK IN A VERY SANITARY ASSEMBKY AREA OR BETTER YET, ASSEMBLY ROOM! Motor cannot crank over more than 2-4 maximum turns before engine start or you have removed all lubrication from the cam & lifters and now are grinding a rough surface that will lead to cam failure!!!! That’s about 2-3 seconds or starter engagement! After that, take the intake and lifters out, and relube the can lobes and lifters with a brush and try it again! Over our 24 years in business, we have lost only I cam lobe on one camshaft out of hundreds of startup and breakin runs on flat tappet camshafts!
Absolutely 100% agree that a clean work area is crucial and may be a contributing factor no one is considering. I’ll add that wearing gloves and changing them if you are handling parts that have assembly and break in lube on them to keep your hands clean, or just wash your hands regularly, goes a long way to prevent contaminants.
I believe the problems with cam failures have several overlapping root causes. I have a background in heat treatment and metallurgy and have built many motors. The changes in oil makeup, cam lobe design with greater lift ramp angles, extreme spring pressure and the cam/lifter materials used. Contrary to some beliefs many of those name brands have cam blanks made in China with questionable material and even more questionable heat treatment. In addition when a cam lobe gets wiped out was it the lifter or the lobe. Lifters deserve some scrutiny as well. Tight lifter bores will prevent lifter rotation. I had a Comp Cams solid lifter cam go bad a few years ago in a BBC and I was extremely careful during the build and it created a mess. I would like to see a serious builder do some in depth testing of failed cams. To include actual material analysis down to the alloy contents and micro hardness testing of a lobe cross section. Or go roller and be done with the guess work.
Roller cam and lifter failures are a problem too (different reasons). At the manufacturer level, it’s extended oil change intervals wreaking havoc on the rollers, deposits preventing oil from getting into the rollers, oil shearing, etc. on the performance front, its lubrication and combination related. Really aggressive cams are just hard on parts. Crazy spring pressures are hard on parts. The pressure on the contact points in the lifter from the valve spring can exceed 50,000psi try being an oil molecule and not getting out of the way for that contact force.
@@TheGT350Garage ALL Cam lobes fail due to loss of material. Microscopic amounts of the lifter and lobe are removed and carried away by the lubrication every time they make contact with each other and this is when everything is working properly. The why a lobe fails quickly or prematurely deserves close examination by a skilled builder or similar results can be expected. If its lobe pressure thats at fault even when within Mfg spec its still a failure. If its the lube used even if provided by the Mfg well its still a failure. If modern flat tappet cams are so fragile that they need to be treated like a premature baby maybe thats a clue that they are not able to survive under the pressure and lubrication the average persons use. The long list of things you suggest to avoid a failure simply supports the argument of why they should be avoided. A quality Isky or Morrell roller lifter on a quality cam and good oil regularly changed and all should be welI for the moderate street / track build with no break in required. Those who have been meticulous building a motor and taken the precautions only to have it fail don't forget.
The way you make that statement is completely false. Blanket statements of “all” don’t work, and here’s why: I’ve maintained numerous flat tappet engines that have run past 500k miles in Ford F-150 fleet vehicles (4.9L I6, 5.0L & 5.8L V8s) so at the microscopic level, we’re talking about such a small number it’s inconsequential to say that normal wear is a slow play towards eventual failure. The key to those numbers was maintenance with the correct lubricant and quality filters at 3k oil change intervals. Several of those trucks were in service 12-15 years to reach those miles, running them 36-42k annually back in the 90s. In those engines, it was more common to have a valve spring fail than a cam lobe or lifter, we rarely had internal failures though. Flat tappet cams regularly outlast the valve job, head gaskets, or a wide array of peripheral components. And to that point, if you talk to any UPS mechanics who serviced the 300 Fords (older guys who worked there from the ‘70s through the early ‘00s), they regularly racked up over half a million miles with minimal issues with flat tappet cams. It’s not a design issue, the issues are application and user generated, as much as anything, and maintenance practices are a big player in the failures post break in.
Anything that come out of red china is garbage!
Only cam failure I have had was 37 years ago and a Crane, they stood behind it and replaced it.
That long ago, it was usually an actual parts problem. These days it’s more a knowledge issue.
@ may have been, may not. That motor did not fire right up, and I could have caused it. Crane took the cam back, with a copy of the speed shop receipt, showing it was bought with springs, and stood behind it. I made sure it fired right up round 2. I never really knew the cause, but credit crane with standing behind it.
Crane was a great company to deal with until they started running into financial issues in the early 2000s.
People have forgotten how to break these things in. You can't just slap a new hydraulic camshaft in and boom you're done. Valve spring pressure is critical. Pull your inner springs out for break in.
Or run a break in spring set. In most engines it’s easy enough to change. The problem is people get a case of the lazys these days.
I am not an expert in metallurgy, I just want to tell you about my experience with blocks and heads that were manufactured in Mexico. Ok I'm going to be somewhat rustic, here in Mexico when I started building engines due to some failures in the head gaskets I began to question how good the head and block resurfacing job they did in the machine chop was, so it occurred to me to use a glass 1 centimeter thick with two sandpapers glued with a thin layer of spray glue. Holding the glass with a double suction cup I began to carve the surface of the block in different patterns. ok I realized 2 things, the first that the work of the machine chop was very bad in this case, and the second that after applying that in different blocks and heads made in Mexico and made in the USA I can tell you that the amount of manual work and the largest amount of sandpaper that I have to use in a block made in Mexico when purchasing a block made in the USA... I don't know what it contains but the Mexican block is harder
Hardness isn’t necessarily a material difference, it can also be from heat treating the parts or the way the parts are cooled during the manufacturing process.
Thank you man for this valuable information, bad luck that I couldn't watch this video before, I'll be honest, I had a failure in 2 compcams, one on a 351w and the other with a 460. I'll talk about the 351w, it had 90lbs beehive springs, ok I put zddp additive in the oil, I lubricated the cam with an assembly lucas thinking it was the right one, I primed the engine before starting, it started quickly, I maintained rpm 2000 for 20 min, exactly as you said in that short period of time the problem came to light, I started to hear a tick tick tick in a lifter... when I disassembled the engine again the cam came out with 1 lobe and 1 lifter completely damaged, what seemed strange to me was that none of the 15 lobes or the 15 lifters had any signs of failure.
Why all of a sudden are mechanics who have decades of experience building engines with flat tappet cams saying there is a problem?
Because when you do something long enough, you get complacent and fall into bad habits.
THANK YOU!!!! I've never had a cam wipe either.....I've been using Isky Rev Lube for years!!!!....u validated my methods with pin point accuracy!!....I've never even worried about springs, but now ya got me thinkin.....building a 400 Pontiac, Kauffman Racing heads.....dual spring w/damper.....I mite just remove the inner spring.....but i haven't had to b4, and this is my 3rd go 'round with a set of Kauffman heads......(they BLOW E-heads away).....all my cams have been hyd or solid FLAT tappet, and ALL have been happy......just wondering if I shud remove the inner this time around......I know the spring, its the same one for all 3 sets of heads......never had an issue.....TY for a super concise, well explained vid......I'm now a sub'r, as I'm a HUGE Powell Machine/Weingartner fan, and have been for YEARS, not just recently.....TY sir, PEACE to you!!
I agree with your outlook. Oils are not worse, they have gotton better. Same with the camshafts & materials or even machining. We havnt lost technology, we have gained. We have better everything. More precise, less labor invested for better product. I could possibly believe a quality control decrease? Only becouse cams have changed with the times & i believe most of the money & effort & attention ia probably focused on what is to date. And to date is roller cams, not flat tappet. All cars today are built with roller cams. I dont think any are made with flat tappet? So it coukd be a case of a company keeping a line going or a shop going simply for a small group of people in sociaty that still hold on to what was the past for dear life. The chiefs at such a company might see this shop as not worth it & just a pain in the ass! I can hear them complaining about just even keeping the lights on!!?? Lol! And hence a push toward only making roller cams now?? Now myself also have never had a cam failure & all ive ever used have been flat tappet cams. I think of that stat being true for me, & i think about what i know about when it comes to the mindset of the average American male mechanic of today & im sure they truly beleive they did not make a mistake & did a perfect break in! But anybody that has ever told you about how good they are at their job, you should follow them around for a day & compare what you see to how they describe themselves. To listen to them it makes me wonder how myself & this person have ended up working in the same place?? Why are they not with Nasa??? But also, a look into my past & almost any event one might see can show a definite trend that would suggest im not just getting lucky. If im successful it might mean im doing somthing right??
The actual physical location of the lobes on the core is also an issue- the lobe C/L needs to be .030" behind the lifter bore C/L. Lifter to bore clearance for rotation speed is critical
Not exactly, because the tapers are ground onto the lobes opposing each other to limit thrust from the taper trying to push the cam out of the block.
groove lifter bores so oil sprays on the cam lobe. Comp cams sells a tool for this. old pushrod flat tappy engines always had shitty oiling to the lifters splash oiling just isn't that great. Also you can avoid low quality lifter problems if you just send your old flat tappet lifters in to get refaced there are companies that will do it. Also yes high spring pressure isn't helping either.
Grooving the lifter bores needs to be done carefully, and they need to be honed after grooving to ensure there are no high edges along the groove that could prevent the lifter from rotating freely.
I break in many a year never lost 1 I use used ls springs brea in then switch to upgraded pac springs and run it with quality oil that's good for flat tappet. Also use break in rockers when applicable.
As long as the final springs you run provide the correct valve control without being overkill you’re on track.
Flat tappers have tucked for 20 years now,NASCAR engine builders won't touch em😊
@rickyfulks6656 NASCAR is a whole different level. You’re talking about cam profiles that are trying to extract every bit of power from a particular engine combination for a particular purpose. Valve lift is in the .700-.800 range, duration is 260-280 @ .050”, the RPM gets up past 8000, and that’s a full on race application. Failures there can be expected. A street engine with less than 235° @ .050” and less than .560-.580” valve lift should still be viable in most cases. Verify the crown and taper, run the right springs, use the right assembly lube, and break it in correctly and I find there simply isn’t the issue others are having.
It's poor machining on the lifters
Can be, but easy to check and not as common as it’s being made out to be.
Great t shirt
Never say never
That was the best video I have seen on this topic over the last years, period. Thank you very much for your advice and your recommendations. Now I am confident again for installing a cam in the future 😊
I can't even make it past the first second of the video with calling bullshit. In correct cam lube and break in are causing the problems with cams? We have been using the same lube and break in procedures for over 50 years, moron.
I wonder if people aren't testing lifter bleed down during assembly.
Contamination in the lifter from something as simple as towel or rag lint is all it takes to cause a lifter to bleed down.
@TheGT350Garage That's right! I wonder how many cam failures are a result of this. I bleed test them all and will be blocking the filter bypass on my personal builds.
That and also people don't prime the engine enough either they just build up oil pressure on a gauge and call it good on my Chevy engines I prime it till I have oil coming out of each push rod no matter how many times I have to rotate the engine you can hear it on a lot of these startup videos The lifter beating the s*** out of the cam hey friends
@carlpreston1680 I prime the oiling system using a power drill chucked to an old distributor I ground all the teeth off the drive gear.
@@thisisyourcaptainspeaking2259 That's what I do too
You should run the valve lash to spec. for break in, if you increase the lash, you will be breaking in the lobes and lifters in a different area. also, part of the lobe will get no break in.
We’re not talking a massive amount, .004-.006 loose will not hurt a thing, especially with iron heads. You’re talking a few degrees from the base circle onto the lobe at the most gentle transition on the cam. The break in is far more critical at higher lift numbers on the ramps and nose of the cam than the base circle or transition.
I agree 100%. I've never had a failure either, in the same amount of years as you've stated. The main issue is oil and spring pressures, as you stated. Like you mentioned, I run springs around 70-80 lbs on the seat and around 200 or so open for break-in, and I use Valvoline VR-1 in everything I build, but especially flat tappet engines... Last summer though, I did have my first failure. But it took over a year and 1500 miles of driving. But it did what I have never seen in my life. EVERY lifter went bad. ALL 16 of them. They were Crower Cool-Face, EDM style lifters.... Have you heard of or seen anything like this before?
An across the board failure after than long would be either a break down or contamination in the oil, a change in the available lubricant volume to the cam and lifters. Unlikely to be a mechanical cause or springs because the chance that 16 springs failed the same way is astronomically high, like winning the lottery odds.
I'm with the crowd on using sealer on freeze plugs, why take a chance
If you live in a climate where it never freezes, you’ll be fine.
When I tacked up to 6500 (70Mach 1) my buddy (72Mach1)both 351C, he thru his duraspark away and put points in his!
Autolite makes much beefier dist. than motercraft, hell there stuff in gen. is better
Autolite distributors became Motorcraft when Ford sold the brand because having Autolite and Motorcraft were essentially competing with each other in the late 1960s. To say one is better than the other is like saying identical twins are genetically different.
I need a dual point Distributor sbf, nobody carries them now! I like points. Compared to fords first couple electronic, single point will out rpm them! Thanks for sharing your wisdom with us!
The last thing you want on a street engine is a dual point distributor without a vacuum advance. Vacuum advance is essential (necessary) for older engines to run their best on modern fuels. Electronic ignitions are drastically better than points. But I stick to magnetic pickup distributors and recommend avoiding HEI or other distributors with internal (especially brand specific) modules.
What so often is not addressed is QC (Quality Control). In the end it is just as much a responsibility of parts suppliers to exercise QC Acceptance Inspection and testing as it is the manufacturer's responsibility. Failure to do acceptance QC whether the parts/materials are sourced from China or the USA invites unscrupulous practices by manufacturers or material suppliers. This is true here in US as well as abroad. In decades past materials and parts were ordered in large quantities and stocked for use over several months or even a year or more. Today's "just in time" inventory management has impacted QC Programs as overly costly and get reduced or eliminated completely. Why do GM's Delphi Lifters have excellent reputation? NOT because they are made in USA, but because GM's QC Acceptance program ensured it! GM could not afford recalling millions of engines because poor or non-existent QC allowed poor quality parts into their system. Years ago I worked in Aerospace Machining and QC started with Material delivery, manufacturing processes (at each step), Final pre-ship QC Inspection AND FINALLY acceptance QC checks by the customers including destructive testing. This final step is most important of all! So blame the cam suppliers if their cams / lifters fail - they did not do their job by holding vendors accountable through QC.
If only we all had the money to do destructive testing. Comparing aerospace to automotive isn’t quite a fair comparison. And the blanket assumption that QC is not in place is false, the cam manufacturers are testing the batches of cams and lifters, they check their finished products as well. We know some lifters are slipping into the marketplace with issues, that’s literally why I suggest grab a caliper, measure OAL at the center of the lifter and the edge. Easy to verify the taper is there. And GM’s Delphi roller lifters in the V8 are eating roller cams under warranty, I’m seeing more roller lifter failures than flat tappet failures as a result of extended oil change intervals. Maintenance and choice of lubricant are as important to all engines as the QC on the back end of parts manufacturing.
@@TheGT350Garage i was not meaning to negate all the good points you made in the video. They are all valid... but there is no magic involved. If design criteria is met (poor installation, break in procedures and proper lubrication aside) then there should not be any reason for increased failures in recent years that is not relative to poor assembly and break in procedures. There has always been inexperienced builders or "backyard Mechanics" doing cam installs. My experience tells me that QC if done will identify if there is an indemic materials or manufacturing problem. Many like to just blame Chinese manufacturing as the main problem, but having lived and worked in China I know they are just as capable as US providers and the opposite is true as well (just like US providers). I think you are right on mark with people using too heavy a spring when roller springs are so prominent. Cheers
Look at Lake Speed Jr's Motor Oil Geek Channel, he has a really good video called (more zinc= more wear?). Basically he says 1. ZDDP helps to a point, then it starts to hurt, 2. no oil is best for every situation, I guess we need to guess and check? I think I heard him say somewhere the interaction between newer oil and gasoline packages are hurting solid cams somehow. Anyway, it's the lubrication and Lake Speed Jr knows. (or at least more than just 'throw more zinc at it')
It’s not the lubrication ‘if’ you’re using the correct oil formulation for an engine with a flat tappet or direct acting mechanical bucket cam. Engines like the Mercedes AMG W156 (direct acting mechanical buckets in a 7500rpm 6.2L DOHC V8) have cam and lifter failures due to the lack or EP additives since Mobil 1 reformulated their European 0w40 and 5w40 oils (which were viable in muscle cars up to about 2010 or so. Use the correct oil.
I use driven breaking oil , driven hot rod oil and driven assembly lube and I've had good luck I don't use racing oil or diesel oil because my application is neither , oil has anti-wear and extreme pressure additives and zinc is heat activated so i imagine breaking oil zinc comes into lower temperature when it comes in it leaves a hard candy coating on the lobes which is beneficial for dry starts or low oil situations so like you said it's important to get the oil splashing on the cam so the other additives like boron can do their job not all zinc is created equal either there's different formulations for different oils so just because a oil has a lot of zinc doesn't mean it's any good for your application other than GM EOS its hard to know about any of the other zinc additives other than claims which a proper break and oil is all you should need anyways . Great video thanks for putting it out
I have a solid flat tappet in a 289 and use modern oil it’s fine . Bought 3 solid flat tappet for bbc wiped out all 3 not one lifter all the lifter dead in 5 minutes of run time . Video taped it for cam company. They keep replacing for free . Give it a think ! The cam and lifters are bad
dont run out of gas ! never had a car have a lifter failure
This is the craziest thing back in the day when i really had no idea what i was doing i did several backyard builds with a mixture of new and used parts and never had a cam failure and now its common place.
We’ve all done that “slap it together” junk engine at some point, it’s shocking how long they seem to last. But if you tried using mixed up parts at a much higher performance level, it fails much sooner.
@@TheGT350Garage just saying something is a miss when you have to go through all these checks and procedures and still have failures, and I have never even went through the breakin period just assemble throw it in the car and drive it to work 80 miles away and no problems.
You mention Powell and he has a video about the crown of the lifter not being correct!
But it’s not every lifter, and there isn’t one “correct” spec for lifter crown that goes for all makes and models of engine. I give him a pass on that because he’s being overly cautious on that point.
Thank you for a great discussion.
I bought 4 sets of lifter. 2 sbc and 2 sbf. Sent them to Powell Machine before he sold his grinder and 63 of them were out of spec. When he has the gatorman lifters there is very little savings in going flat tappet now. I agree with your valve spring diagnosis though. Years ago I’d run a lighter spring to break them in and switch them after break in. When a Sbf hydraulic flat tappet set is $500 may as well buy a $300 trick flow cam and a $375 set of lifters from Powell or the rebranded model Engine Tex’s for $200 for a sbc and. $270 summit cam.
Don't be ignorant. Certain manufacturers from China quit putting taper on the lobe and a crown on the lifter. Engine shop i work for, has a indicator jig that shows lifter crown. Those that fail have no crown, and no taper on lobe, so on start up the lifter won't spin and will wear to damage in just a couple minutes. If you were more observant or not so ignorant you would know this. Cam companies that were good for decades suddenly was not, China sourced parts were the problem.
They realized that no one on the receiver's end was going to do QC and reject their deliveries. So they quit doing the expensive work and pocketed the difference. You _can_ get quality work from China, but you have to pay for it and continue to verify the product meets design specs.
Ignorant? What does your claim of “Certain manufacturers” accomplish without calling them out? You clearly came here to complain but not to help. If you build engines and don’t share the manufacturers you’re having problems with, you’re not helping anyone. But you seem to enjoy sharing an otherwise useless opinion.
We always used a non detergent oil with GM EOS, i see guys on line adding zink to oils not designed for it or claiming you cant have to much... try baking a cake with mentality for ingredients or watch Lake Speeds video about the wear caused by to much zink/phosphorus.
Seat pressure controls the valve, open pressure controls the lifter... the trend to higher spring pressures have been a problem in the solid roller world for over a decade as well.
Isky Rev Lube... Molybdenum disulfide, the best
Back in the day I used to break in the cams with double springs n moly lube n there were no problems. If the cam n lifter hardness specs out then what happened?
I have both Hydraulic rollers and solid flat tappet cams from the same manufacturer...both cams cards are requiring 155 lbs and the seat, and 415 off seat! Crazy shit here!
I agree spring pressure is #1 , so many want to run aftermarket heads with stiffer springs but at some point something has to give up the ghost and the lifter bottoms take the brunt of it .
I agree with most everything said here. Well, I'll rephrase that. I agree with all of this, although I don't do everything said here. Personally, since the early 80s, I use either the entire tub of cam assembly lube or 3 of the 'envelopes'. I goop that stuff all over the cam and lifters. People have told me that I waste it but it isn't a waste. The stuff readily dissolves in the oil and then the Moly and such is sprayed on the cam through the break in. I run the motor for 45+ minutes varying the RPMs between 1900-2750 the entire time. I personally believe 30 minutes to be about the very bare minimum. I have run a number of brands of camshafts with my favorite being Comp Cams. Their assembly lube came with the best directions and it used to say(early 80s) to run the cam 30-45 minutes. I agree and always have (BTW: I have installed/ran a bunch of cams (probably 25-30) all but 3 were flat tappet and I have had 0 cam failures)(I did have one lifter failure but that was a used factory hydraulic roller that had an internal plunger collapse(I'm going to blame the springs on that one!). I think that the big failure rates are improper assembly, lube and procedures. I have seen a TH-cam video with some jackass putting white lithium grease on the cam/lifters and pretending that was some kind of assembly lube! That was pathetic! The best advice I have is the gray/black assembly lube from Comp Cams, use the entire tub n of it, RPMs at or above 1900-2600 for 45 minutes and if in any doubt...Watch some TH-cam videos of cam/engine installs that have a bald or gray haired engine builder! The older Cat has most of his experience with flat lifters designs. Oh, one more thing don't put a bunch of additives in the oil. Assembly lube is fine. I have watched Richard Pettys family and employees add STP to engines being installed in the pits(and I've used the STP myself) but don't put things like Slick 50 or any of these wear preventing additives, in the crankcase. If they work, they are trying to prevent the wear that is needed to wear the cam and lifters in together. I hope this info helps someone who hasn't installed flat tappet Cams before now. Yall Take care and I enjoyed the video. Good info and very nicely done.
Most' of the flat tappet failures out there are a cause of poor preparation of a build. The 1st thing i do with a block that will be using the factory lifter bores before any machining starts is check the lifter bores for clearance with the lifter i will use or at least with a known test lifter (wether its getting flat tappet or roller). Several times doing this i have picked up excess clearance, burrs, scuffing at the bottom from a previously damaged lifter etc. Then, for guys that dont fit their own cam bearings, when you get your block back check that the shop has not burred the bottom edge of the lifter bores by carelessly using the cam bearing installation tool. I always used to get blocks back with small dings at the bottom of the lifter bores that i know were not there previously prior to doing this operation myself. Deburr your lifter bores if required. A 'very' light hone to cleanup the surface is not a bad thing, dont go crazy. After final cleaning of the block again the 1st operation while acess is easy is to pass a lifter thru every bore, ensure it passes thru with absolutely no catching or resistance at all, if it does, fix the problem or thay lifter is failing. (Goes for roller lifter also) Next the cam goes in to test lobe offset, ensure that every(flat tappet) lobe is slightly off center to the lifter bore, if a lobe is centered, it will fail. Use quality parts! Do not use a prelube that dissolves in oil! You want a moderate coat of 3% Moly grease on every lobe and on every lifter 'base', not the lifter body only engine oil on the body. No this will not block any oil filter, cut the filter after break in, you will see little lumps of the moly grease but the filter is not blocked. The reason for moly grease is that it will not dissolve and drop off as soon as oil splash hits it(use dissolving lube on a test cam, then pour engine oil over it and watch how quickly it begins to dissapear), the moly provides an excellent film to get started, any excess moly pushes to the lobes edge and as the engine runs you have a small 'reserce supply' of moly that can acess the lifter base as it is throw off via centrifugal force, only some of it gets the lifter but it all helps to stop any scuffing early on. No part of the valvetrain must bind, lack clearance for lift etc. Dont be lazy, use lighter springs for as long as possible, take inner springs out , buy light springs that can take the lift etc. If the customer is ok with it I have them leave light springs in for 500 to 1000km, just keep the rpm in check. If its not practical then so be it but 30 to 40 mins of light spring use is a 'must'. Change oil and filter after 30 to 40 mins. Dont use any of the cr@p additives! Get the correct oil from the beginning. Mineral or synthetic, low Detergent and moderate zddp, 1200ppm to 1800ppm is where you want to be. If its a solid flat tappet, ask your cam co what the tightest allowance on lash is, use this at 1st break in so that break in includes ever area of the open/close ramps that are ever likely to be used under full spring load. Prime your oiling system wherever possible. After lifters are under valvetrain load, do not turn the engine prior to start up any more than absolutely necessary for fittment. Set everything so the engine runs immediately on startup, use a known carb that was working thay day not 3 months ago, test for spark or use a known dissy, put a point dissy in for , whatever you know will work immediately. I could go on 🤣 **
I use to use overkill springs on a 13-1 440 with a mech cam.Last one I used the rec springs and it went flat. I fixed all my problems and went roller.
I don’t use the recommended springs these days, I also don’t use monster springs. If an engine needs a cam with much more than 235-240°@.050” or so of duration, I also don’t use flat tappet cams very often any more. There’s too much power to be had by going hydraulic or solid roller above 235-240° Of duration to give up for a couple hundred dollars more in parts. Under about 235-240°, and under .550-.575” lift or so, flat tappet cams perform really well. Spring pressure needs to be carefully considered though, and if you’re running into a need for dual springs on a flat tappet, it’s probably time to go roller.
Another great video, love the idea on lash adjustment / prime and rotate. Yes have the timing set and if using a carb fill it first.
I blame social media (aka chinese whisper)for the 'increase' in flat tappet failures!
The only issue with social media is that people are gullible and believe things from supposedly reputable sources without verifying the validity of the claims. The cam and lifter failures are not because the parts are all coming from China, but mostly a result of people taking really bad advice and trying to build an engine combination for the first time using badly matched parts.
35 years in the engine business many race wins and championship motor go through our shop.and this year tops it all. We have had 9 flat tappet motors go flat . They have had break in springs installed with 100 lb seat and 260 open with Amsoil BR oil in them an had approximately three to four sessions of run time as long as one hour. Bring them in change to the race spring and a race or two then one or two lobes go flat. 2024 has been a night mirror. Insiders at Howard's and Comp Cams have told me most every lifter is now a product of China. I was able to get a set of EDM solid lifters from Crower a week or so ago where they claimed they were USA made lifters. Will see how this goes. Until this is fixed we are trying to stay away from solids until something changes. Problem now is lots of what we do are flat tappet class built that require the flat tappet stuff. Hope the Camshaft Lifter manufactures get there act together soon for the sake of staying in business.We have had Ford 351 style motors running seventy six hundred RPM ten years back in the Texas Super Racing Series that had 160 seat 390 open flat tappet cams that still holds the track record at track here in Texas. Another 363 flat tappet Ford in a dirt limited late model that worst finish was second until they changer rules. Something in the flat tappet world changed for sure. 🤔
100% brother, my uncle has been building engines for 40 years. He owns an old toyota townace van that has gm flat tappet cams and the van has an absolute heap of miles on it. He uses the cheapest oil you can find, most of the time its different weights and even used chain lube and the van just keeps going and going. Goes to show, the industry is not lying, something is not right, the cores are rubbish all round…. Probably bad batches from China. Nice money making excercise for the industry.
I've bought hundreds of cams from Delta Cam in Tacoma Washington over the years. Not one of them has gone flat. Try them.
I can say with 100% certainty materials sourced from China are inferior. I worked in the heat treating industry for many years and we would regularly investigate cases where parts failed or didn't respond within spec to heat treatment. We would do a analysis of the material and it would be deficient in the content of a variety of metals like nickel, chromium, and molybdenum. Chinese manufactures would intentionally reduce these elements as a cost savings and improperly label a material knowing its out of spec. Until I see a qualified lab do a XRF and microhardness testing of cams and lifter to prove otherwise I will suspect China is selling us garbage along with the blue pills killing half the country.
Great info, thanks for taking the time to make this video!