วีดีโอ

Hi Laven, thanks so much for sharing that. It means a lot. I wasn’t sure if people who watched me many years ago were watching any of my vids anymore. So thanks for commenting. Fee free to let me know if there are any passages you’d like me to focus on. Have a great day!

Hi Angel, Thanks for commenting. Are you referring to Hamas in their wicked attack on Israel on Oct 9?

Hi Phil, Thanks for commenting. I would agree that the true Israel is part of the church. The true Israel or the Israel of God as mentioned in Gal 6:16 is in reference to all believing jews. However, I wouldn’t agree that the church has existed throughout all history. My understanding is that the church came into existence after the death of Christ. The church is described as being something “new” by Paul in such texts as Eph 2:15 where he speaks of the work of Christ: Eph 2:15 by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, The new man refers to the entity of the body of Christ that entails jews and gentiles. Paul speaks of this entity as "new" which is the idea of something without precedent, something that is novel, fresh. This implies this entity didn’t exist in the OC. This entity of the church is new in the sense that gentiles no longer have to become jewish proselytes and keep the law of commands to worship God. Instead, they can come to God as gentiles and not as jews.

@@JaguerRhye Hi, well the NT calls Israel the church in the wilderness. The word for the people of God, congregation or gathering, is the same meaning and we are grafted into the same root that they were in and have been cut off from which is Christ. If the congregation of the saints (the church) started in the NT then what was Abraham? Not a part of Christ? But Abraham saw Christ's day and rejoiced. I see that we are part of one body and we are all joined to Abraham (a point the NT makes repeatedly) and that's how the Jews are part of God's people too. The Septuagint uses the word ekllesia for the people of God. Anyway that's my thoughts.

"Hi, well the NT calls Israel the church in the wilderness.” Yes, but the greek word for church which is ekklesia basically means congregation or assembly and it doesn’t always refer to the body of Christ in the NT. For example, in Acts 19:32 the word ekklesia is translated as assembly and it refers to a gathering of gentile pagans and not believing jews and gentiles: “Some therefore cried one thing, and some another: for the assembly was confused; and the more part knew not wherefore they were come together. So yes there was an assembly of congregation of jews in the wilderness but the nature of that assembly or the constituent makeup of it is different than that of the assembly / church of the body of Christ. “If the congregation of the saints (the church) started in the NT then what was Abraham? Not a part of Christ?” Abraham was justified as all true believers were in the OC, but they were not part of the body of Christ which is an entity that came into existence the NC which is made up of jews and gentiles (where gentiles can worship God as gentiles and not as a jewish proselyte as was the case in the OC) Paul indicates. Abraham is justified but his relationship to Christ is different than that of a NT believer. I think these differences may relate to matters of the degree of glory, blessings and responsibilities believers will have in the ‘life to come. I will give this some more thought as this isn’t something I’ve thought through compared to other things. “But Abraham saw Christ's day and rejoiced.” My understanding is that this is referring to Abraham anticipating the period of time in which the messiah would come and took pleasure in it. Or it referring to Abraham’s act of faith in God whereby he was justified since Christ is God / the I AM as he goes on to declare. I just don’t think this is implying the body of Christ existed back then since such a body / assembly is identified to be something that comes into being due to Christ’s work on the cross In addition, consider that Christ spoke of building his church in the future tense in such text Matt 16:18 “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” Note that Christ doesn’t say he “has been” building his church which would imply the church already existed and would continue to be built, but that the church would be built in the future. This idea harmonizes with how Paul speaks of the foundation of the church being that of the apostles and prophets in Eph 2:20: Eph 2:20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; The fact that the apostles are part of the foundation would suggest they came first before the church exists as the foundation of a structure is laid / established before the structure itself. If the church existed during the time of Abraham, the structure would exist before the foundation was completely laid which entails the *apostles* and prophets,

@@JaguerRhye I just want to pick up 2 points. The Church is the body of Christ but that doesn't say anything about when it began and that it was built on the Apostles and Prophets does. Paul isn't talking about the NT prophets, because they aren't significant, but the OT Prophets. Peter isn't the rock, what Peter said (that Jesus is the Christ) is the rock. The church was indeed built on that truth but that doesn't mean that it was not built prior to the incarnation. The second point is what the church is. The church is the congregation of the people of God. It was in the OT and it is now. This didn't change. This is why the same word is used in the Septuagint as in the NT. The additional revelation in the NT doesn't mean that it wasn't true previously only that it wasn't revealed previously. The deity of the Messiah, the Trinity, etc didn't become true but were always true but revealed later. This is true of the church unless you are defining the church so as to exclude saved people from it and that can't work because Paul makes a great deal of there being only one church of which all believers (Jew and Gentile) are members and for which he died. All those for whom he died are the church, are his body, for which he died. The point is that there is a new way in not that there is a new place to be. We were once strangers to the commonwealth but not now. Romans 11 is about us being grafted into the thing that Abraham and the Jews were already in. How can that be if the thing didn't exist until after Christ?

Hi Phil, “The Church is the body of Christ but that doesn't say anything about when it began and that it was built on the Apostles and Prophets does.” I already cited passages indicating that the church which is the *new* man began after the cross of Christ and thus the OT saints were not part of the church as it didn’t exist yet. Why do you believe the church is spoken of as a *new* man in Eph 2:15? “Paul isn't talking about the NT prophets, because they aren't significant, but the OT Prophets.” I would tend to agree. My point was to draw attention to how the apostles are part of the foundation which harmonizes with the fact that the church began after the cross of Christ. “Peter isn't the rock, what Peter said (that Jesus is the Christ) is the rock. “ I would agree that Peter isn’t the rock. I never claimed he was the rock. My point was that Christ spoke of building the church in the future. Why did Jesus speak of building the church in the future? “The church was indeed built on that truth but that doesn't mean that it was not built prior to the incarnation.” The texts I have cited prove the church didn’t exist before the incarnation. To reiterate, its referred to as a *new* man relative to the assembly that existed in the OC. Christ speaks of building it in the future. The apostles are part of the foundation. The foundation is laid first before the structure is built on it. “The church is the congregation of the people of God. It was in the OT and it is now. This didn't change. “ The church as described in the NT is a *new* man consisting of jews and gentiles where gentiles don’t have to become jewish proselytes to worship God. Such a group never existed in the OT. “This is why the same word is used in the Septuagint as in the NT. “ I already addressed your citation of the word “church” and showed how ekklesia doesn’t always refer to the body of Christ in the NT. “All those for whom he died are the church, are his body, for which he died. “ Christ died for the church, but it doesn’t follow that believers who existed before the incarnation are part of the church. “We were once strangers to the commonwealth but not now. “ I assume you are referring to Ep 2:12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: During the OC, God had only entered into covenant with Israel and not the gentile nations, as part of this covenant there were certain promises God made to the Israel and not to gentiles. But now there is a new entity in the NC (the “body of Christ”, “In Christ” v. 13) which includes jews and gentiles and everyone who is part if this entity through faith can enjoy all the various promises God (Spirit, fellowship with God) has made towards this entity. This new entity is *not* the commonwealth of Israel that we become part of but the new man or “Christ” as Paul indicates in verse 13: “But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.” Gentiles were once aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and were without God, but now we can draw near to God, not by being part of a the commonwealth, but by being in “Christ”. “Romans 11 is about us being grafted into the thing that Abraham and the Jews were already in. How can that be if the thing didn't exist until after Christ?” Gentiles are grafted in to the place of blessing due to jewish covenants. These jewish covenants existed before Christ came. The natural branches (the jews) are natural as they have the same DNA as those to whom the covenant was originally made which was to the patriarchs. We as the gentiles are wild because we don’t have the same DNA as those to whom the covenant was originally made. I deal with some of these passages in the video below in case you’re interested. th-cam.com/video/it5culqXD2Y/w-d-xo.html

Hi User, Yes, I would agree with you that Michael is appointed to protect Israel from such nations as Iran.

Hi Edward, I believe there are some mega wealthy people that run America, including jews. I''m unclear how this relates to a fallen angel being over Iran. Yes, the jews living in Israel are real jews. They have done DNA studies showing that the jews who live in Israel today is similar to the DNA of those living in the land thousands of years ago. www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2023-10-09/ty-article/in-first-archaeologists-extract-dna-of-ancient-israelites/0000018b-138a-d2fc-a59f-d39b21fd0000 Among other testing, they have done genetic testing on ashkenazi jews in Eastern Europe have been genetically tested and they have middle eastern genetics. Note that the fact that there are true descendants of Jacob living in Israel fulfills some Biblical prophecy as God promised there would be a worldwide gathering of jews in unbelief as part of his prophetic plan for the nation. You denial of this is simply you succumbing to the lie of the devil who is seeking to hide prophetic fulfillment from people. I sense you are familiar with Black Hebrew Israelities?

Thanks for commenting. I've looked over those passages, but I'm not clear how they teach that the church is Israel. Can you clarify?

@@JaguerRhye exodus 19:1 “Children of israel went forth out of the land of Egypt, the same day came they into the wilderness of Sinai.” Verse 3 “Thus shalt thou say to the house of Jacob, and tell the children of Israel.” You can read verse 4-5 just saying how the took them out of Egypt and if they obey him they will be a treasure unto, imagine being God’s treasure. Verse 6 “Ye shall be unto me a kingdom of PRIEST” what job does the priest have? To teach the word of God. John 21:1, 14-17 why did he say it three times? Because the importance of teaching the word of God comes first that is what church is for. We were chosen to teach the word to every other nation, unfortunately are sins lead us into captivity. Psalm 147:19-20 how can someone teach you the word of God if they don’t know it? Amos 3:1-2 acts 10 who did the angel send the Italian to? Peter an Israelite…. All that simple

@@JaguerRhye I can ask you simple questions about the book you would have no clue

Hi 1o3mj, There are definitely parallels between Israel and the church but doesn’t doesn’t imply they are the same thing. Yes, priests were to teach the word of God even as Christians in the church are to speak God’s word. But the nature of the congregation of Israelites in the OC is not the same thing as the church. This is why Paul refers to the church as something “new” in such texts as Eph 2:15 where he speaks of the work of Christ: Eph 2:15 by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, The new man refers to the entity of the body of Christ that entails jews and gentiles. Paul speaks of this entity as new which is the idea of a something without precedent, novel, refresh. This implies this entity didn’t exist in the OC. This entity of the church is new in the sense that gentiles no longer have to become jewish proselytes and keep the law of commands to worship God. Instead, they can come to God as gentiles and not as jews. Do you agree? "Amos 3:1-2 acts 10 who did the angel send the Italian to? Peter an Israelite…. All that simple" I'm not sure how this implies the church is Israel. The church consists of jews and gentiles. Peter was a jew who was part of the church.

Yes, its also rampant among christians as well and its often due to a lack of self reflection and being emotionally damaged so that one enjoys looking to find faults in others in order to help boost one's sense of sense by feeling superior to those we criticize.

@@JaguerRhye Yes, “christians” who defy the Word of God as well (note “christians” small “c”).

Hi Charles, My understanding is that the marriage of the lamb entails Christ marrying the bride of Christ which are all believers in the church age. It wouldn't entail believers living in the OT nor those who get saved during the millenium. Note that this marriage happens before the second coming which means that the believers on the earth at that time going through the tribulation, whether jew gentile, are not part of the bride of Christ.

@@JaguerRhye why then would he be coming as the bride groom? He came as the Son the first time; and converted the people of God to children of God. Our relationship with Him changed from Master : servant to Father : child, but if he returns to receive us, his brides, then he would be giving us word that brings our spiritual standard up from children to Brides right? Then we will truly know him and understand him in an intimacy that God described as deeply as a bride knows (or should know) her groom. Makes sense to me that way. 3 time periods, 3 fundamental levels of spiritual awareness. It also makes sense of the “3rd heaven” as Paul refers to it in 2nd Corinthians. There are 3 spiritual worlds that decide the 3 separate times.

Hi Charles, The rapture is physical and spiritual. Its physical as it entails people being raised from the dead and receiving glorified bodies. Do you agree with the principle of interpretation that if the literal sense makes sense seek no other sense? When Christ spoke of his death, do you take that literally? I do because it makes sense. But when the Bible speaks of Christ being a lamb, that's not to be taken literally as that would result in a contradiction as Christ is not an animal.

@@JaguerRhye so all the cremated Christian’s bodies will be reassembled? But the perishable cannot inherit the imperishable… explain that to me. To your question, no because there are lots of parables that make sense literally, but still aren’t literal

"so all the cremated Christian’s bodies will be reassembled? But the perishable cannot inherit the imperishable… explain that to me." Yes, they are all given imperishable bodies which will inherit the imperishable new heavens and new earth. "To your question, no because there are lots of parables that make sense literally, but still aren’t literal" When Christ identifies something as a parable, its obvious that we are to look for a spiritual meaning as the very nature of a parable is that its meant to communicate something spiritual. I'm referring to statements made in the Bible that are not identifies as being parables or metaphors. For example, Rev 7:4 speaks of 144,000 Israelites. Do you believe its to be taken literally? I believe so as it makes sense and caused no contradiction. "And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel."

I tend to agree. I'm being sarcastic in the video

Hi Beauty, I'm not a pastor if that is what you're calling me. My real name is Scott.

okay Scot

Hi James, If a person claims to be a Christian, they claim to have the same ultimate authority as me and I have a right to challenge their beliefs. I’m also a teacher and responsible to teach people the word of God. Do you believe I should abide by your belief on this issue you have challenged me on? I mean, do I have to leave people alone because you say so? If so, why do I need to listen to you?

​@@JaguerRhyepeople have their own relationships with god. You're not perfect either. You are casting stones. The bible warns of people like you.

I’m not sure what you mean about leaving people alone. I’m not forcing anyone to listen to me. They are free to ignore me. It seems you are quite passionate about your position to the point of you accusing me of being disgustingly entitled. Sounds like you want me to listen to you as if you think you have the truth correct? So you’re feee to express your feelings and beliefs and that’s perfectly fine. But apparently I’m not permitted to do that based on your double standard.

@@j.mcdaniel4580I never claimed to be perfect. I deserve hell like everyone else because of my sin but I’m saved because of my faith in Christ. I have a right to criticize Christians as they have attitudes that conflict with the Bible. What gives you the right to attack what I’m doing? Are you being forced to listen to this video? No. You just want to express your feelings and beliefs correct? But why should I listen to you?

@@j.mcdaniel4580where does the Bible warn of people like me?

HI Vania, I’m 49 and I really don’t do anything special for my skin. I think it’s just genetics really as my grandfather had similar looking skin.

Hi Charles, they are still Gods people in principle but not in practice in the sense that they don’t have fellowship with God. Rom 11:28 touches on this in that they are enemies but they are still beloved of God. The land belongs to them although they will not fully enjoy all of it until they embrace Jesus Christ which will one day occur.

@@JaguerRhye Coming to Christ would basically be a recantation of most of modern Jewish doctrine. So then they would just be… Christian. With extra steps. But long story short anyone stuck in the old time period is rejecting the man of God.

Hi Charles, When a jew comes to Christ, they are still jews. This is why Paul refers to himself as a jew, even though he was a believer: Acts 22:3 I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, and taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day. The OT still has application to converted jews in various ways, but such things as the Mosaic covenant is no longer in affect as there is now a better covenant.

@@JaguerRhye not to other Jews, though. If you accept Christ as a Jew the other Jews will reject you. Then you have “messianic Jews”, which again, just Christians with extra steps. And I’ve read those passages, but they don’t constitute a rebuttal. Paul is outlining his response to a complicated problem during a large paradigm shift. It’s a bit different on the fringes of the end times where they were, than it is for us. It’s much more concrete now, the way to the father is through the son, and apart from him none can enter in. The Jews reject the man of God, Jesus, and therefore they also reject the father. Repentance is conversion.

Hi Charles, The fact the other jews might no longer consider a jewish believer a jew doesn't change the fact that he is still a jew. I'm unclear what your point. Do you believe a person stops being a jew after they believe in Christ? "And I’ve read those passages, but they don’t constitute a rebuttal. " Paul declares he was a jew in Acts 22:3. How is that not a rebutle? Stating why Paul said what he said doesn't negate the fact that Paul stated he was a jew after he was converted. " Paul is outlining his response to a complicated problem during a large paradigm shift. " And part of Paul's response was stating he was a jew. Paul also referred to Peter as a jew in Gal 2:14 But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews? Paul states he is an Israelite in Rom 11:1 I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. Do you believe Paul was an Israelite, even though he was also a believer in Christ? "The Jews reject the man of God, Jesus, and therefore they also reject the father. Repentance is conversion." Most jews reject Christ, but not all. I'm unclear what your point is. The fact that most jews reject Christ doesn't mean that a person ceases to be a jew after they believe in Christ. What are your thoughts on Rom 11:28 where people speaks of Israel as being enemies but at the same time "beloved". What does it mean for Israel to be beloved in this context? "As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes."

Hi One, I would agree that there is a scripted power but I believe that power is God. I assume you believe it might be some kind of occult group? Or reptilians which is one theory? So do you believe when Jews began to go back to Israel around 1948 they did it mainly because they were following a script and not so much because they really just wanted to go back to their homeland? So do you believe all the anti semitism that has gone on for thousands of years was not done in sincerity to kill off the Jews as that would have violated the “script” as you say. I mean I believe there are many groups that really hate Jews and want them all dead. But for some reason they haven’t been able to do so. What force or scripted power do you think is keeping Jews from getting killed off over thousand of years? Or do you believe it’s all an act. Sorry if this is too many questions

@@JaguerRhye I do know there is an internal god within us all as Christ said. But the people traveling in 1948 have nothing to do with the real Hebrews. Those that comprise 60-80% that call themselves the chosen ones and oppressed are the oppressors in disguise. Why else would they be reviled and kicked out of the hundreds of regions over 1000 times? These Turkic people are masquerading to gain sympathy, while dishing out the same evil they accused The Chancellor of in Germany. If you ask me, I have looked at HISTORY and compare it with news media. Likely the opposite is more correct than what we are fed. The evil in history are the good and visas versa.

Hi One, "I do know there is an internal god within us all as Christ said." Where did Jesus say that there is an eternal god within us all? "Why else would they be reviled and kicked out of the hundreds of regions over 1000 times? " Because Satan wants to kill them as they are God's chosen people and they have a key role to play in the end times. The fact that there are jews in the land of Israel is a fulfillment of prophecy as God promises to gather the jews back into the land from all over the world, but they would be in a state of unbelief.

@@JaguerRhye the order of Old and New Testaments are reversed just as much as the Books of the NT are out of chronological order much like text messages that arrive late and confuse the reader. Languages were set up to languish the reader. Ital languages originate from Phoenician and morphed to Latin and then Greek was formed and Hebrew last. So the writings are reversed not only in chronology but in a R to L incorrectly transcribed by translators. Many Middle Eastern writings match up as reversed Greek words. Oops. So we have an obfuscation of words to have you chase your tale while a false narrative is established as to who the Hebrews, Israelites and Jews are. All three are not the same. One group takes on the self-proclaimed title of “The Chosen Ones.” Then proceed to call all others dogs and they create USURY (and the Christ got mad) to financially enslave man as has happened in our World Debt Spending System. Churches do not teach about debt but encourage tax by tenth (tithe) and perpetuate the lie the Abrahamic Evil Trinity stands for. When a country sniffs out a wolf in Sheep’s clothing they are expelled. I usually read the Greek and Hebrew text and see the inconsistencies of the Italian Vulgate as being a retranslation from an earlier language but it is impossible when some text is used when it was not available during the period. I go into detail in my book (publishing this year). One thing is for sure, history is a lie agreed upon and it is usually 180 degrees of what is reported. The good are bad guys and the bad are good guys.

@@JaguerRhyeI gave some rather lengthy replies but they seem to have been deleted.

Hi Amletbook, I guess you don't have an answer to my question as to why jews exist after thousands of years of them being persecuted?

​@JaguerRhye they never have anything to say other than free palestine

@@zachs8274I gotcha. I’m not confident she will give me a decent answer but I’ll give her a chance.

Hi Destiny, You won't be laughing on the day of Judgement.

Hi Alan thanks for the thoughtful and supportive comment. You express yourself quite well. I think the vid is up to at least 7 dislikes now. This reminds me of the old saying “I know what I know. Don’t confuse me with the facts” as I shared before, I also used to hold to replacement theology. It really is an evil theology which undermines the value of the Jewish people and as a result will tend to diminish the amount of prayer that churches make for them. In my old church which had to replacement theology, I don’t think we ever prayed for Israel at all. This prayerlessness can ultimately lead to demonic powers to do more evil.

@@JaguerRhye Thank you, I agree, this disregard/hostility toward the Jews allows evil to enter and I believe it counter-acts the good intentions of such groups/churches that hold this view. Contrary to my agreement with one of these individuals holding this view, that this is a non-essential issue… it is not. It is absolutely essential that we love what our Jewish savior loves. Btw, I can’t wait to receive the book you suggested from Arnold Fruchtenbaum. I want and need to be completely conversant in this essential subject.

Furthermore, even if no one else appreciates your posts on this subject, I surely do and am thankful.

@@alangalloway8700I think you will find that book to be very helpful. I think he does a great job showing how erroneous replacement theology is. That author is like one of my primary mentors. Bill Salus is another sharp theologian.

@@alangalloway8700thanks Alan. It seems there are some others who appear to like my vids too thankfully

Thank you for these videos me and my family love listening to them. I always make sure to send them to my siblings in Africa and I’ve been wondering if you are possibly in Atlanta Georgia and have a church here. Me and my family would love to visit it

You're welcome Beauty! Thanks for watching and for leaving such an encouraging comment. I appreciate it. No, I don't live in Georgia. I actually haven't gone to church in years, partly due to my issues with traditional churches and also because of certain emotional struggles I have. Note that if there is any particular Bible verse you want me to address in a future video, feel free to let me know and I'll consider it. Thank you again!

@@JaguerRhyethank you for the response and I will continue to watch your videos

Thanks for commenting Alan. Nice to hear from you. Yes, I agree that disregarding the jew is very serious. What I want people to realize is that we are to value the jew not because they are somehow better than others, but because they are beloved of God. So when people site all kinds of evil things jews have done, that is pointless as my argument is not, love jews because they are great people. It's ultimately because they are the apple of God's eye and we are to communicate something of the love of Christ to them. I hope that some people will go to the scriptures and study these things for themselves and even challenge me with the various proof texts people often use. You might find an exchange I had with someone else on part 2 interesting. I'm not sure if he responded to my latest response yet.

@@JaguerRhye I’ll keep watching for it. Don’t see it yet in the comments on my end.

Hi Mcgroyper. Thanks for commenting. the Jews and gentiles took part in killing Christ. That generation of Jews that rejected Christ were subject to the judgment of 70ad. It doesn’t follow that Jews lose their special status before God nor does it imply there will not be a national regeneration in Israel in the end times which is what the Bible predicts in both the OT and NT. What are your thoughts on Rom 11:28 where Israel is said to be enemies but they are also beloved of God. Rom 11:28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father's sakes th-cam.com/video/aY6o8sx41Fo/w-d-xo.htmlsi=q-gHdEHjBYCVGh8W

@@JaguerRhye the “gentiles” weird you would use that word if your a Christian. The “gentiles” merely did what the Pharisees asked of them. PP told the crowd I do not wish to kill this man, then the Jews shouted. They were gods chosen people until, they killed his one true son. That’s why today they still try to bring they’re “messiah” which we all know is the anti christ. Israel is no longer a physical place it is the living body of Christian’s. You should know this. Not running cover for the people who killed god. And still reject Jesus Christ to this day. Don’t make me start naming all the godless rituals and magic they still use to this day. Will you start using the word goyim next? And refer to yourself as a cattle? Read the talumid, they allow child rape of non Jews, slavery as long as the slave isn’t Jewish. You have much to learn. They said Jesus Christ is burning in excrement in hell, along with his mother. I have nothing in common with these people, they are my enemies. At the very least Muslims respect Jesus and stick up for him whenever they see him blasphemed. Jews blaspheme Christ EVERY CHANCE they get. Don’t be dense and say that doesn’t happen.

@@JaguerRhye John 8:42-45 let’s hear your thoughts on that verse.

@@MrGroyper​​⁠ the fact that Israel is guilty of all kinds of sins doesn’t negate the fact that they are still Gods chosen people. They engaged in all kinds of evil during the OT but they are still Gods chosen people. Do you have thoughts on the passage I cited which was Romans 11:28?

@@MrGroyperJohn 8 doesn’t negate my position at all. I already indicated that the Jews during Christs time rejected Jesus and were judged in AD 70. Rom 11:28 indicates the nation are enemies but they are beloved for the fathers sales. They remain Gods people NOT because they are good people but because of Gods promises to the patriarchs. So your citation of all their sins is pointless as it harmonizes with my position. Israel are still Gods people in principle but not in practice as they are in a state of blindness. That blindness will come to an end as Rom 11 indicates and all Israel shall be saved. The entire nation will become regenerate which is predicted in the prophets. Are you aware of that?

HI Alan, Thanks so much for taking the time to write such a thoughtful comment. I appreciate it a lot. Yes, that Gal 6:16 passage is a common proof text people use to try and show that the church, entailing jews and gentiles, is the true Israel. But that is not what Paul is speaking of at all. I plan to make a video on this text eventually, but I will share some thoughts for now. Gal 6:15 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature. Gal 6:16 And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God. The Israel of God simply refers to the believing jews in the church of Galatia. In Gal 6:16 Paul is pronouncing a blessing on members of 2 different groups who follow the rule of salvation through faith alone. The first group is to those of the uncircumcision, the gentile christians who are those whom the epistle is largely directed to. Paul mentions this very group in the preceding passage (and earlier in Galatians) where he speaks of them being the “uncircumcision”. Such people are blessed of God who believe in Jesus Christ. But there is a second group who are the Israel of God. These are the circumcision, those who are *jewish* believers. Similar to how the gentiles/uncircumcision are spoken of in the preceding text (and earlier in Galatians), so the jews are as well as they are called the circumcision. But why does Paul speak of these jews as the Israel of God? It is likely to emphasize how they are blessed of God in contrast those jewish teachers who were the Judaizers who were asserting one had to keep the law to be justified. Such men are under a curse as Paul indicates in chapter one of Galatians due to their false gospel. In addition, what replacement theologians like to do is assert the word “and” in the latter part of the text should be understood as”even” so that “Israel of God” is understood as another term/label for the gentile group mentioned in the first part of the text (i.e. “as many as walk according to this rule”). But that isn’t an appropriate understanding of the word as the greek word for and “kai” should be interpreted in its typical sense/primary sense of simply joining 2 different different things/groups (believing gentiles and believing jews). One would only interpret it as “even” if there is clear contextual/grammatical” reasons that would require that, but no such reasons exist with this passage.

@@JaguerRhye Wow, thank you so much for explaining this. I’m learning so much and am finding much encouragement by the people God is putting me in contact with since I’ve been seeking understanding of this widespread indifference and hostility toward the Jews. I raise cattle and a recent customer who bought two steers are gentile friends of the Jewish people, have visited Israel, and share my view of God’s methods to improve our pastures through regenerative agriculture which are inexpensive and require no artificial inputs. My new neighbor who shares my view of regenerative ag is also pro-Israel and loves the Jewish people. And now you with humble and honest biblical defense of the Jews and their ongoing covenant relationship with God.. I am blessed and becoming confident regarding the road ahead and my desire to make informed disciples. Thank you again. I’ll be learning from your other videos as well.

​@@alangalloway8700 You're welcome Alan. Thanks for sharing all of that. Note that long ago I used to believe the church was spiritual Israel as well and Gal 6:16 and texts in Rom 9 would be passages I might use to defend the position but such a defense is based on a careless examination of the texts. Some theologians I would recommend are Arnold Fructenbaum (a messianic jew) & Thomas Fretwell. Arnold Fructenbaum wrote a very in depth book on Israel called Israelology The Missing Link in Systematic Theology which is based on his doctoral thesis. But you can find lectures by him and Thomas on line. www.ezrafoundation.org is a site Thomas runs.

@@alangalloway8700 I appreciate your encouragement as I actually don't think I would have made this video today if you didn't express interest in it. I had planned on making it at some point but often I find longer videos don't seem to connect well with my viewers, especially when it comes to sensitive issues as this one.

@@JaguerRhye Great resource, I’ll look into it, thank you. Your background gives me hope for my reasonable friend that, for now, holds the view that the Church is spiritual Israel. I have the same hope for the head of the “Politically Active Christians” group that interviewed me and endorsed my candidacy for school board trustee. In hindsight I’m glad they didn’t ask me any “Israel” questions! I’m perceiving that many in this group, including the leader, likely hold to replacement theology. Every day I’m humbled by the things I see locally and that I’m thinking God is leading me to raise my voice.

Hi Alan feel free to let me know if you disagree with anything in the vid. I actually am open to the idea that the sheep gentiles are not true believers at this judgement. This would explain why they don’t seem to be aware of how ministering to the Jews is ultimately ministering to Christ which is something I would think many true, pro Jews Christians would be aware of.

I believe this judgement is the outworking of Gods promise to Abraham how he would bless those that bless him and curse those that curse him. It’s referring to the temporal blessings that people and nations enjoy as a result of supporting Israel etc. it’s not about justification. It seems these gentile sheep were seeking to be a blessing to the Jews and their temporal reward would be that they were welcomed to the millennial kingdom. I would assume also they would all end up becoming believers in Christ at some point in light of the blessing Christ pronounces on them