วีดีโอ

Excuse me, what advantage? It’s disgusting and there will be consequences

So DSR Factor in Control Panel needs to be set ingame, too. Nice to know.

played minecraft for a couple hours and slept for about 12 hours after that....most tired ive been in like ever

thank you 😭

GOAT!

I have an I5-10400f with an 3060 ti. My problem is that for some reason my monitor (1080p) doesn't work propretly on FHD so I have to use 1680x1050 which is even worse..

I had to use 4k on 1080p you make my CPU not bottle neck

Exactly what I was looking for. Thanks a bunch, great work.

I am lucky and proud to own both pairs and use both for (REFERENCING) all the time. Both are excellent. I find the DT990 more rewarding playback, more of a warm consumer playback!

im about to try this as soon as i finish installing Valorant. i hope it works, and if it doesnt, my system just needs an upgrade. but you explained my exact situation perfectly, i cant thank you enough for the useful information you described in this video, im impressed. incredible!

hey, i'm using an i5-2310 and rx 6600 rn and did some things in the video. i enabled amd vsr and tried 2k and 4k (my monitor is 1080p) on destiny 2 at max with some tunes to the settings but i'm still getting abysmal fps, which is disappointing given that my crappy laptop could get 30-60fps at 720p with lowest possible settings. any recommendations?

I can play tpp games like Witcher, rdr2, eldenring, Assassins creed or forza forever and nothing happens. BUT whenever i try to play 1st person game i cannot look at the screen more than 10 min

This is why i hate pc gaming, consoles are much much better in every way for a lower price, games are stable, you can actually enjoy not like pc which is all fixing and fixing and no peace gaming, fk its been 2 years since i bought my pc and i never enjoyed it never, but yea i enjoyed a lot more in 1 month on my ps4 than those 2 years, swear to God i'll never go for pc in my life ever again it sucks

dev just need to ditch the damned dx11 already. that is one main reason why there is stutter since it single thread api.

In terms of comfort, they are not at all identical: the dt 770 has a significantly greater clamping force on the head than the dt990, the reason is that this ensures its sealing against external noise as a closed headset must make, but the counterpart is more discomfort, especially over long listening segments. But it is true, as you say, that after a few weeks the headband of the headset will take the shape of your head better, will relax. This is also true for the sound: you should know that the diaphragm membrane inside the headphones requires a few hours of listening at a slightly high volume to break in (let's say 100 hours of various music , with bass, etc.), this will relax it and thus offer a much more flexible sound than when they are new, the result will thus correspond to what is intended auditorily for these headphones by the manufacturer : we should not rely at all on the first days of listening. The fact that the dt 770 is a closed headphone also gives a feeling of confinement, even a slight feeling of suffocation, over long listening times (but obviously these last points are subjective). This feeling does not exist on the dt 990. You are right to say that wearing glasses with these 2 headphones is easy, but the movement of the glasses rods on the ears (naturally caused by simple facial tics, or simply because the glasses always inevitably move away from the top of the nose, headphones or not) creates a small squeaking noise in the ears in the dt 990. So avoid moving the rods while listening, the best is to enlarge the headband of the headphones when you have them on your head to replace the glasses rods, then resume listening (I do this often). The 250 ohm models may require you to turn the volume up to almost maximum, which can be solved by plugging them into a quality external DAC: for example the iFi Zen Dac AIR (British company) costs only $73 US dollars. However if you have a MacBook M2 or M3 (Air or Pro model) you won't even need an external DAC and will have no problem with the 250 ohms, because these MacBooks all have a headphone output by default that is compatible with high impedance headphones (I have a MacBook Air M2). And the sound is excellent. 250 ohms is better than 80 ohms, I have owned the DT 990 pro in 80 and 250 ohms and I opted for the 250 ohms. The difference is that when you turn the volume up significantly you will have a more assured preservation of the quality of definition, you will have the same clear breadth of sound. 80 ohms may compress a little at very high volumes to protect against the tiny risk of saturation, but this nuance between the two is extremely subtle, perhaps even imperceptible at bottom for many users. As for the sound itself, I quite disagree when you say that these are bright or high-pitched headphones. It depends on so many factors: the ear habit that has developed previously with other types of headphones, the type of audio material (difference between musical genres, voice narration in news broadcasts, etc.). Every time I have done listening tests with Sennheiser HD 600, 650, etc.) I have found the sound veiled each time. To use a pictorial description of my listening experience with Sennheiser, it is as if I have each time had the desire to move these layers of veils with the urgent need to finally reach the sound source stripped of all these filters (as if I wanted to break down a door that locked me in). I experienced a bit of the same phenomenon of frustration with the Mezze, even the 109 pro. With my Beyerdynamic dt 990 pro, I don't have this veiled intermediate at all, I almost have the impression of reaching the sound "as it is". This sound without a veil of distance is what you probably call "brilliant" or "high", while for me it is the sound that delivers a natural, close, intimate acoustic. To say that the DT 770 and 990 are "very brilliant" and that the DT990 are even more "piercing" is, in my opinion, a completely unfounded estimate. On this subject, I invite everyone to watch a video entitled "Beyerdynamic DT990 Are Scientific Perfection". Also this other video with the title "beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO Studio Headphones Review". Finally, you can also listen to this video which is French, the original title in French is "Quel CASQUE CHOISIR pour son PIANO NUMERIQUE (+ mon casque parfait)". The english translation tool of youtube for subtitles will work without problem. The topic we are interested in starts at 4:50 minutes in the video about the question open headphones / closed headphones. The DT 990 pro will be commented not a lot of time after. In addition, this video which very much matches my point of view, its title is "Open-Back vs Closed-Back Headphones for Music Producers, Audiophiles, & Engineers". As I said above, you obviously have to run your headphones in for at least a hundred hours (and with a fairly high volume) to achieve the full sound performance promised by the DT 990 pro, in order to release the flexibility of the internal membrane, because it is not necessarily yet relaxed when completely new. This gives fluidity to the mediums and indisputably makes it possible to eliminate the initial rigidity. For example, I had clearly perceived the moment when the membrane of the DT900 ProX (another beyerdynamic model) had become stiffer, and clearly heard the gain obtained. I would point out that my DT 990 pro did indeed have a little brilliance when i bought it, I could hear it on certain pronunciations of consonants for example in interviews (very lightly), but this has now completely disappeared with the running-in. You also say that acoustic instruments sound better on the dt 770, but for me the opposite is true. For listening to classical music (piano solo, quartets, trios, orchestral works), I can confirm that the DT990 pro are clearly preferable and authentic in instrumental restitution: instruments with the 770 have more added resonance and are less natural, less ample and less clearly detailed You are right to say that for a closed headset the dt 770 pro has a very convincing soundstage that is surprising. 2 other points of disagreement: 1) We can't say that people who will be in the same room as us will clearly hear the sound coming out of our open dt 990 pro headphones. Yes, some muffled sound will come out a little (it's an open headphone), but nothing disturbing. Unless you listen to music like Rap at very high volume, but otherwise no. 2) I very often listen to old jazz recordings from the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, and also old archives with the phonograph-type background sound of the time, but I don't find at all that the dt 990 pro highlights these sound defects, it doesn't hide them, it's very different (that's their charm). The sound of the dt 990 pro for archives is excellent.

Great explanation.

i just got the G935 and i feel like ill pop hopefully this works

In can be used with phone but probably with OTG connection cable..

The only problem I have is that I wear glasses and my headset is too tight on one ear, causing me to have an indent from my glasses

I'm kinda late to the party, but I'm surprised you didn't mention that the impedance rating of the headphones make all the difference in how easy/hard they are to drive. For example, the DT 770 Pro comes in an 80 ohm, which (unlike your 250 ohm model) is very easy to get a good volume on the vast majority of interfaces. It makes no sense to buy a 250 ohm headphone when you own consumer-level electronics or a budget audio interface (like your Behringer unit). Some headphone makers are even making 32 ohm versions of their headphones, so that they can be powered by mobile devices like phones, iPads, etc. Bottom line, the lower the impedance, the less power needed to drive the headphones. 250 ohm headphones are a holdover from pro studios of DECADES ago where everything in the studio required higher voltage, so headphones of the time were designed so they wouldn't get overloaded when plugged in to, say, the console/mixer. Also, dedicated headphone amps were a mainstay of pro studios, but are simply not needed anymore for bedroom producers who aren't doing live tracking with multiple musicians needing different monitor mixes. Of course an headphone amp will solve your level problem with high impedance headphones, but why buy high impedance phones in the first place if your audio interface can't drive them?

9:27 on laptop this setting is absent

amazing video man, but my situation is opposite. im gpu bottleneck what should i do about it i do have a laptop tho

i had my 770pro 250ohm for 3.5 years by now and stood the test of time till today (except the leather pieces) sadly today my left speaker died, even thoug i probably could soldier in a new driver, i probably gonna replace them as a whole. just unsure if i should get the 990 or 770 pro x

I believe it's a combination of fov and different light rendering techniques in games for me anyway. Because i can play pretty much anything, fps, flight fps, 3rd person action games. But...some games will get me sick as hell, cold sweats and nauseous.

thanks bro

The biggest downer for the 770 pro i got now for 3 years or more (I don't really know anymore) is the changing of the earpads themselves... Took me about half an hour do get it done...

I just bought a new system and im gonna try my best to see what you did through thank you❤

Are you russian?

thanks to your explaination, i can FINALLY play The last of us part 1 remake at almost 60 FPS all the time, when theres no enemys, the game goes at 75 fps, but then drops to like 45-60, wich is WAAAY better than the 25-30 i got most of the time, and that is cause you made me look for the option for the resolution scaling for AMD cards, wich is making a huge difference! Thank you and i hope your channel does well friend :)

I face the same problem

I have a GTX 1060 6GB Max-Q paired with an i7-7700HQ. It's a laptop. Is it worth trying this there?

you save me, the introduction to the video described me so well lmao

Cod last of us

this is another reason why i switched to AM4 , i just got tired of the LGA 1151, probably the best & worst generations to get into PC gaming, (i had a i5- 6600K 4.8ghz OC /1050ti)

Yeah unfortunately I need something that works with a Focusrite Scarlet 2i2 4th gen and Equilizer APO simply doesn't...

excellent video, can you mod the HD 560S to be close back?

Picked the DT770 Pros. Theyre great! Needs a AMP though, very quiet on my pc. (80ohm)

I played Call of Duty on PS4 after playing it on PC for a while and the 60° FOV made me sick.

for me? jsut change a cpu

Criminally underrated video

Thank you so much man, you actually fixed my issue! Really good Video & Explaination

how to reduce bottleneck due to high cpu temps in a laptop ressulting in a thermal throttle? (im experiencing very bad perfomace in valorant as i should be and after some time the fpss drops drastically )

Vsync or setting a fps cap can also fix cpu stutter.

Thank you so much! I was wondering how on earth I was going to apply Oratory1990's eq to my AKG K702's.

I've started to use NiMH cells a few months ago (posting 7/21/2024) and I've had a battery leak today randomly, it was popping all of a sudden. I'm using NiMH batteries in my mom's boombox (6x C) and my portable radio (Eton Elite Executive, EEE) which is 4x AA

radeon chill can be a life saver for really bad bottle necking if u have nothing else (undervolting can also probably help a bit but chill is easier and limits fps. also u can select whichever games that u experience tearing in and limit the fps for those specific games)

Thank you for the effort and the time spent to explain this 🎉 gratefull ❤

what if i does sonar sound reference in dt990s?🤔🙄

just use a reference track and check the visualizer if bass is too loud

Hi and thank you. It is possibile to bypass the tool, f.e. if you want to listen to your studio-monitors?