hello people, I have had lots of complaints that I'm putting up a bogus video. This video is for non profit, it's been uploaded for people who are interested in space exploration, rockets ect... There is no CGI in this video I have no reason to pull wool over people's eyes, it is what it is. If you don't like it, don't watch it if you are interested then proceed.
That is correct, and also explains why there were no blast craters when they landed on the moon. No atmosphere, no direct plume straight down. Just a wide pattern of blowing dust which is what we see in all the moon landing videos.
Notice how the rocket plume and exhaust fumes continue to expand as the altitude is increased. This is a result of the decrease in pressure as the atmosphere thins out. This is an overexpanded supersonic nozzle.
That rocket should've been flying through a soup of Stars, Where's all the billions of Stars? 😂😂 CGI horseshit, we should've seen Stars being left behind like the rocket was flying through a soup of billions of Stars & no spin, no tilt & wobbling, no orbiting the Sun at 67,000mph flying around in circles & no blazing through the galaxy at 500,000mph zooming through space 🤣🤣🤣 wtf is this CGI horseshit?
Sugarloaf Mountain Films Some flat earth guy launched himself into a rocket in order to prove that the earth is flat. His rocket blew up and fell right into the ground along with him.
Hoping to see the sky, the star and the truth. The world is round like a globe or flat like floor. I just want the truth. But until then one thing is certain. The knowledge of Allah the All mighty god is way so superior than the human kind.
I'm afraid there is no Earth. Globulists and Flatulists are in league to convince us that there's actually such a place as Earth. THEY WILL FAIL!!!!! :)
It is, but it's not noticeable, that's not the reason why you see ice buildup. That's because the rocket uses cryogenic propellant and oxidizer. That's why you see it on the main stage, but not on the boosters or the upper stage. The boosters use solid fuel, and the upper stage uses a hypergolic mixture, so both are stored at room temperature. The main stage though, uses cryogenic RP1 and LOX.
When the ice begins to vanish as the rocket enters space, that is due to the vaporization of the water to steam as the vacuum lowers the boiling point to below the freezing point, and the sun increasing the temperature of the ice enough to sublimate it. Water takes a lot of energy to boil or sublimate, though, which means a lot of the bigger chunks stay.
@algol29 Well, the answer to your question is very simple. The scientific community didn't "eliminate" ether "to make Einstein's theories work", but rather because it was complete nonsense. As to how rockets impulse themselves and turn, the answer is fairly simple: Newton's third law. You talked a bunch of nonsense about friction ... that's not how any of this works. You don't need to impulse yourself off of anything. Any action has an equal and opposite reaction. Rockets shoot gas out very fast, and the equal and opposite reaction to that is the rocket moving in the opposite direction of the gas coming out of it. In order to point where they want to go, some use gimbaling (ie, moving the engine nozzle, so the gas shoots out in a different direction, altering the rocket's direction), or they use RCS thrusters, basically tiny ports that shoot out compressed nitrogen, thereby applying a force on the rocket through the same principle. Simple enough?
@algol29 LAWS of motion are not "bound to Earth". There isn't a caveat that says * oh this only works in an atmosphere. That isn't how LAWs work. Equal and opposite. Fire a gun in a vacuum chamber. Would you feel recoil or not? Of course you would. Friction is counter to motion.
@@PoundBaby6out by the moon there would only be a few atoms in a cubic meter of space, that's hardly inside the atmosphere lol The Karman line is pretty much where 99% of the atmosphere is below you.
Notice how the rocket exhaust gets wider as the air gets thinner ? The air actually restricts the exhaust gasses but when it gets out of the atmosphere the rocket actually works more efficiently.
Okay, I viewed space launches from several Sci-Fi movies including Armageddon, Intergalactic and even Spacecamp. in each case they actually used real footage from real rocket launches mixed with computer animation. The computer animation is much more polished and and uses quick succession of angle and view changes. If you know what you're looking at it's pretty easy to discern.. so yes this video is 100% real..
I love how calm that man announces the stages of launch. It shows how well people can really work together if they are patient, respectful and optimistic with each other. It's not like in the sci-fi movies where everyone goes, 'WE'RE LAUNCHING NOWW!!' Or whenever there's a 'launch,' it's always a weapon. I think it'd be great to have more sci-fi movies where there isn't any war and it's all just exploration and fun stuff! Why does it always have to be so serious?
+Robert Kitchen agreed. Some actual footage of space would do alot to backup the claim nasa can actually go there. . . . The apollo stuff doesn't cut it for me.
+Robert Kitchen Considering that MECO (main engine cut-off) had just happened, my guess is that the stage was spent at that point so it was jettisoned, and the camera was attached to it.
***** Well duh, you _need_ to go sideways to reach orbit. Orbit means moving sideways so fast that as you "fall", the ground curves faster than you fall, so you keep "missing" it.
Are you telling me that it all this time there wasn't one rich flat earther who rented a helicopter and went to the edge of the ice where the world ends supposedly and filmed what was on the other side as space being there?
My best proof of a globe shaped Earth is that if it were flat and the sun and moon hovered above this flat disc, they sun and moon would start off very small in the sky each day and night and as they move through the sky they will get bigger and bigger until they are as directly above you as possible. After that, when they start moving away they would get smaller and smaller until they disappeared. They do not do this. They stay the same size and even look larger as they come up or go down sometimes and this is not possible with the flat Earth theory. Also, a lunar eclipse is impossible. A lunar eclipse happens far more often than a solar eclipse. The Earth's shadow on the moon. If both su nand moon hovered above the disc, how do we have a lunar eclipse? A solar eclipse would still be possible, but not a lunar eclipse because the sun would have to somehow get to the other side of the disc which would make it night time all over the world at the same time, cast the shadow and then hop back over to the proper side. I can't believe this is something that people even think about these days. I almost wonder if the government pays these so called flat Earth people just to start shit so we will never all be able to work together. It was probably the government that started all this flat Earth bullshit lol. People are so fucking dumb. A little bit of logic is all it takes to know the planet isn't flat, but they must not be capable of that. I love how they say we should question everything and not just blindly follow the "globe Earth bullshit" yet they blindly follow something as fucking stupid as the Earth being flat. We are failing as a species lol. Maybe we should've blown up the planet and started over from scratch.
All the governments around the world have control of Antarctica and nobody is just allowed to go there like that. Research Admiral Byrd he went on a expedition there and discovered more than just that the earth is flat,why do you think all of the world leaders meet there? Research it on here
@@erictalkington5674 You shouldn't despair like you do at the end of your comment. All that is happening is that the internet has made us all suddenly aware of how stupid many people actually are, even though it has always been that way. It also shows that new communication methods can spread bad ideas just as much as they can spread good ideas. But just like the printing press, the overall results will be beneficial fairly quickly - and permanently.
I like these comment sections. I can get the urge to argue out of my system in arguments which have zero actual bearing on real life, and sometimes it even makes me think about my preconceptions and refresh my memory when trying to think of a way to frame my comments. Although I admit that sometimes the very vocal minority of flat earthers makes me a little sad at how far some of us seem to have backslid.
***** You talking to me? If so, Ever heard of the TH-cam App on mobile? If so you should now theres a bug that says the comment hasnt been posted, But in reality, it has, And just like any other FE's, You only came back with insults and no proof whatsoever, And you even upvoted your own comment! You're pathetic, And before you reply to me, If your only thought process is insults dont you even dare reply to me;
@So No are you a real "flat earther"? or just trolling? i cant believe that some people are still believing that earth is flat. Please, are you guys (flat earthers) joking or what? i believe human nowadays are not that dumb. Please stop these jokes, its not funny!
i dont need NASA or anything man.. i just can prove it to myself with my cheap Celestron Powerseeker 60AZ telescope! i can see if our earth is a globe by seeing a lunar eclipse one month ago (mid August). I can see the shadow that earth is round. I can see with my cheap telescope that moon is 1000% globe, because it have curvy shadow (disc will never have curvy shadow), i can see Mars with my telescope, its like a ball not disc. Saturn, it really has a ring that go around it.. if its not a ball or globe, the ring will not be like that. Etc. So, why only earth is flat if other planets are like a ball you dumb dumb? thats more than enough proof! except for an unsound mind people. I climbed many mountain in my country (Mt. Lawu, Mt. Slamet, Mt. Salak, Mt. Rinjani, etc.) if i see the horizon, it really curvy not flat!!! thats a proof. My father have a yacht, so twice a month i ride it and once i see a tanker ship goes by with my binocular, the bottom is gone first, are you telling me that sea is flat? Commercial airplane (the simplest).. you can see it with your fucking own eye that the horizon is not flat. its curvy. Flat earth? wheres the proof? man, i think you are being serious.. not joking. I suggest you to go to a doctor to check your damaged brain.
@So No there are proof, but you do not have that simple.inteligence to understand. Go to school. Never hesrd of time zones, curved rainbows, horizon that disapears, planes, atmosphere abover your head and falling in the horizon, wind, moon that changes position, seizons, sun, days, snow in winter. Etc.
@@thetrashtalktvshow You never know if the spaceship will crash, explode, or malfunction in the launch process and just watching from their POV also adds a little more anxiety for me lol
What is amazing is this is so routine now . I am nearly 80 when I was a child this would have been seen as science fiction ! I remember a conversation with a scientist . When I was a child , who was researching atomic energy. He said we would never get to the moon it was imposable !
same here now spacex are doing dozens of launches and landing boosters routinely its incredible and what's more incredible is people still say its fake,
rstevewarmorycom About 70 years ago scientists didn't know what the hell was possible and not possible But I guess they're smarter than us now since nobody thought the earth was flat back then
thats probably why he was a mathematician and not a scientist. in science you must be able to admit you are wrong otherwise youre holding everyone else back.
Hello Flat-Earth Theorists, I just KNOW you are here. I have a serious question for you: Why WOULD NASA / government / illuminati / saucer-people / whoever actually WANT us to believe the Earth is a spheroid instead of flat? What is the possible reward to them, for maintaining such a complicated scheme over centuries? And why would EVERY nation participate in it?
@HumansRstupid More like you are stupid you brainwashed freak. How about stop living in your mom's basement and go buy yourself a telescope. You can see other planets like saturn and jupiter. Why tf other planets are round but not Earth. People like you seriously need to go back to school because you are a uneducated clown.
To lie about the true nature of creation, our significance in creation, to elevate scientist above the Word of God which tells us a conflicting account and description of the earth and cosmology!
You can literally see the Water Freeze on the outside of the Rocket and then Melt and eventually just break off what didn't melt earlier, ALL in real time And people still call it fake
Really cool video, thanks for the upload. I am always struck by how "easy" and almost mundane a space launch seems, but they are anything BUT. The complexity of the equipment, the brilliant men and women who make this stuff happen...amazing.
Excellent. Shame it ended so soon. Last velocity call was about 9,000 mph, but orbital speed is over 17,000 mph (5 miles per second) - how did it achieve orbital speed after that 2nd-stage engine cut off?
I don't think it's bogus. I think it's quite fascinating, especially with the external cameras on the rocket. Awesome video. Thanks for posting this 999metalme.
the rocket stops going up and away from the earth and starts going across before cutting out.probably cuts out right wea you would notice it hit a wall
@@filipeemerick4483 notice earth stays the same size doesnt get smaller rocket just changes angle.thats as far as they can go lol.no one has ever been to the moon.space exploration blows
@ desperate in what way.clearly pointing out that theas no full view of earth from any footage of any launch from start to finish.launch to space with full footage earth as a whole..no..point is why not.theyv been into deep space havnt they?...the moon...do you know of any footage?oh just snipits and shortfilms oh what they couldnt afford 24/7 4k camers to film any mission recently.yeh ok.oh and im not a flat earther btw just think nasa is full of shit and ppl are dumb enough to believe thea money is being spent on "real" space exploration.what a joke
@ gofast 2014 rocket? so have u seen full footage from launch to deep space unedited no cuts.. no 1 minute launch footage to all of sudden in space landing on the moon lol..when did they last go to the moon? oh the say they dont evn have technology to get the thea rite now 2019....seems your the desperate one..to proud or something? find the rest of this video wea it shows the rest of the mission.wea does the rocket go after this video ends...?
@ would of hit a wall.it stops...as in the footage stops ......u follow? weas the rest of the footage.iv been sifting and cant find the full footage of every single nasa rocket launch.have u seen them? no firmament..have u been up thea? have u seen the footage? once again why do all nasa rocket launch to deep space exploration only have cut scenes...yawn no1 wants to answer this they just keep defend all the irrelevant "points"
you r right...i balloon a Lot and once i almost died when the balloon was punctured when i got too close to the pointy edge...but i coasted to Australia and made it back home,,it is a cube.
This is the only thing we should be discussing in my opinion. This needs to be public demand. It's 2018. I don't know what we live on, but I'm starting to belive it's impossible to put cameras on a rocket. How many things have we launched into space? Wouldn't you think you could make bank of video nobody possesses.
At 4 minutes this rocket is 5 times further down range then in altitude just like all the others, heading out to sea. No wonder they cut the film short.
@@Flat_Earth_101 can you tell me why the shadow on the moon is always curved? How about lunar eclipses? How do tides work? Can you explain how long haul flights are possible on a flat earth model? Why can you see farther as you increase in elevation on earth if it is flat? Why do parts of the world experience different seasons at the same time? Why are different stars visible in different parts of the world?
You really think that it's ME that needs convincing? No. I want the video I suggest for the benefit of those who refuse to believe we are going to space. Mind how you talk to grown ups bro.
+Tommy Lourdes Here's a good one for that. If they claim this video is fake, then they must also believe the Russians are in on the hoax. www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/09/13/soyuz_launch_rocket_cams_provide_a_stunning_view.html
my goal is to find video that puts FE to rest. The footage I need as a keynote would show unedited footage of a payload being ejected far enough out from the earth that from launch to the point where it is clear the earth is a sphere is apparent... I wonder if it isn't something an amateur rocket might be able to pull off..? maybe a few cameras. with simple radio downlink and gps to facilitate telemetry? It would certainly be something I would help fund - a one way ticket to the moon or interstellar space, or better yet, into the sun, out of the earths orbital path...
Tommy Lourdes Today, Oct 21, 1 day after the youtube count of 515,000 flat Earth videos, it now shows 538,000, an increase of 33,000 overnight, yet way less than 100 have been uploaded today??? Got an ideas of what's going on?
For on the screen now was a strange sight, a great pallid plain of stone… the edge of the plain flashed with the brightness of light on water, light across a distant sea. The stone plain was no longer plain but hollow, like a huge bowl full of sunlight. As he watched it grew shallower, spilling out its light. All at once a line broke across it, abstract, geometric, the perfect section of a circle. Beyond that arc was blackness. This blackness reversed the whole picture, made it negative. The real, the stone part of it was no longer concave and full of light but convex, reflective, rejecting light. It was not a plain or a bowl but a sphere, a ball of white stone falling down in blackness, falling away. It was his world.
To close to see the curve the horizon has to come around to meet itself or the horizon would look like the golden arches! Wake up and think outside the box!!!! You have to be a thousand miles or more away to see the curve! They don't go above 275 miles according to them!
Tramseskumbanan it doesn’t take long to reach a low earth orbit for a rocket that travels 7.9 kilometers per second which is several times the speed of sound, and the further up in the atmosphere you rise the lower pressures you have to fight against.
DonkeyFilms It still needs a few more minutes to reach low earth orbit. I think a record holder is the Titan II Gemini that had meco in about 5:34 minutes. The astronauts were then exposed to up to 8G. US shuttle: 8:25 Titan IB: 10 Saturn V Apollo: 12 Soyuz: 9 For launch vehicles that carry (or used to carry) upper stages such as the Titans, Ariane V, Delta IV, AtlasV and Proton M it usually take a few more minutes.
*I am questioning myself...* How come there are people who actually believe the Earth is _flat_ ? How did it even started? I am sorry for the questions but I'm just curious tho..
Cause there are tons of "myth busting" TH-cam Channels talkin shit the whole day long and as soon as enough people told the Same thing, stupid retards started to believe that. I guess its the same way how religion started.
not just that but we are still waiting for an official video of someone at the edge of the flat Earth to prove us all wrong. Its simple, some people are just idiots and love to live in constant conspiracy theories. These are the same now against 5G, against coronavirus but they get infected and run to the doctors
you taking to me hung sing? Well in case you didn't know Heaven is away from the earth. educate yourself before throwing around childish insults. you're just making yourself look the fool
the only thing that is dead is those who do not believe in Christ. don't drag friends and family to the pit just because you are decieved.. it's dark and hell is hot.
Nothing against this particular video, I've watched like 5 now, but Is there ANY video someone can point me to that shows continuous travel (no cuts) from earth to space and then keeps going long enough to see the entire globe? Why do all of them stop at low altitudes where you can't actually see the whole thing?
There is no vantage point from which you can see the whole entire Earth. At best, you could only see half of it. To answer your question, the overwhelming vast majority of these launches that have footage are going into low Earth orbit. We don't launch rockets directly into higher orbits than this. They first get into low Earth orbit, and when systems are checked and other processes are completed, they then do more burns to place things destined for higher orbits into those orbits later. So, what you see in all rocket launches are payloads being put into low Earth orbit. The radius of the Earth is about 3,960 miles. Most things we put into low Earth orbit are at about 250 miles away. This is the equivalent to being a quarter inch away from a basketball. How much of that basketball can you see from a quarter inch away?
@@willoughbykrenzteinburg what about all the rockets we are sending past "low earth orbit" in particular we just sent a helicopter to Mars so where is the continuous footage of the journey from Earth to Mars and seeing (from a mounted 360 degree camera) the view of earth from lift off until it becomes a tiny speck like how Mars is to us from here. To me that doesn't seem to be much to ask for and with all that money funded into it I am surprised no space agency has proven it just to shut the flat earthers up... We have a feed to the rovers so sending a video of the journey really is not that hard to accomplish.
***** The problem is, in reality, the Moon isn't oriented as it was on ceiling. If that was the case, moon would be elipse almost all the time due to angle of view. This wouldn't be possible: i.stack.imgur.com/ulPd2.jpg Also, your model has another big flaw. Yes, i can look 2 different orientations of the paper from 2 opposite sides of the room, but if i move 90° from my current point, i will se another orientation of the paper. Actually, if i move around the room, i can see many different orientations of it. In reality, we can only see 2 different orientations. Sorry, but try again.
***** Your respond is totally irrelevant to what i wrote. Please adress my whole point and don't copy-paste what your god Eric says. When you fully respond to my post, i will respond to what you said.
One need only look at the ludicrous FE model most commonly cited by FErs to see a literally glaring problem. The sun is shown as a spotlight source. There are no known existing spotlight sources in the universe. In addition, it could be night on flat world but the sun would still be visible even if the observer is on the opposite edge of flat world. There is a reason the sun is said to be 3,000 miles high and 32 miles in diameter. Those are the figures required to make the sun appear roughly the same diameter no matter where and observer on flat world is. Not to mention a spotlight source had to be invoked in order to light the Earth partially. Otherwise, there would be no night.
Andrew Jackson: Sunspots do not make the sun a spotlight. The sun illuminates any object in whatever direction said object (Planet, moon etc.) happens to be in it's orbit, making it omnidirectional. Sunspots are relatively few and far between. Spotlights are sources such as flashlights or studio lights. They have large parts of their light source mechanically obscured to point in a certain direction. The Earths weather is the reason for variations in temperature. Furthermore, there are plenty of places where the temps are so cold like Antarctica, that it could actually be opposite in terms of temperature. Other problems with flat world include eclipse problems. The most commonly cited flat world with the sun and moon travelling in the same orbit at the same altitude is this. Solar eclipses would be impossible because the moon would collide with the sun. Lunar eclipses would also be impossible because the Earth never passes between the sun and moon as it does in an actual lunar eclipse. Even if the Earth did pass between the sun and moon as it does in other FE models, the eclipse would be visible all over flat world. Real lunar eclipses are not visible around the entire planet. An example would be the upcoming July 27, 2018 lunar eclipse visible From Europe, Africa, the Mideast and other nearby countries, but not the US, Canada etc. Here's more. The space station has been photographed by amateur astronomers globally. This would not be possible in flat world because the space station was built with a spherical body in mind. I realize your FE beliefs may be Biblically based. But here's the problem with that. The Bible refers or alludes to 3 different Earth shapes. Job 26:7 alludes to a spherical Earth. Revelation 7:1 and Isaiah 11:12 says Earth has 4 corners. Spheres and discs do not have corners. I was unable to find the passage that suggests Earth is a disc. But even if there was such a passage, which one of these is correct? I suspect the disc shape came into existence because someone long ago realized the shape of Earths shadow during a lunar eclipse indicates a spherical Earth. So a disc was invoked to explain the shadow away. But FE proponents failed to explain what I bring up here. I have plenty more but this post is getting lengthy.
This launch is a bittersweet launch. Such a beautiful launch to be ruined by mission failure when the Orbiter plunged into the Martian atmosphere because of a fucking conversion mistake between metric (SI) and imperial units.
+Revanchist8525 It was bothering me that they were calling out the velocity in mph. I was trying to roughly translate to m/s. Science is no place for a clumsy unit system defined by a better one. A mile is exactly 1,609.344 metres since 1959.
+Michael Frederiksen I prefer metric too. But they were probably narrating (and still are) the launch in imperial for the general public's sake. NASA has learned from this stupid mistake! I know that they're now going metric for all mission operations since 2007.
Are you making a joke? Either answer can be as accurate as you'd like. The math for km to m is much more simple. Without a calculator, there are 333 1/3 metres in 1/3 of a kilometre. How many inches are in 1/500th of a mile. Anyone can do the metric equivalent without a calculator. Answer is 126 ft 8 21/32" to the nearest 1/32 of an inch which is not only a pain to calculate, but also difficult to type. The problem with Imperial is which units to use? decimal miles? decimal feet? decimal inches? 1/32 inches? thousandths? a combination of the above? There need be no distinction in metric: To change units you simply move the decimal place.
Excellent vid. Title slightly misleading. Most rockets take around 9 minutes to reach orbit. The video does not show stage 1 separation which has to occur well before reaching orbit, otherwise, there'd be no need for additional stages.
The claim is made by whomever posted this vid because he or she put in into their title. They probably have no idea when a rocket reaches orbit. This has nothing to do with any sort of fakery. If you can actually launch a rocket, which millions have seen shuttle and Saturn-V launches, it wouldn't be terribly difficult to put a camera along the airframe or inside the propellant tank dome area and get video.
44 minutes to get this into its transfer orbit. The video shows stage 1 separation a few seconds before it ends. The camera is on that part and begins tumbling back to earth.
With the suns light beaming at earth at that area. You wouldnt see any. The sunds light overpowers the rest of it. However if it were the other side where its night. You would definitely see the stars
where is the rest of the footage? if this footage was cooking a meal all you would get is boiling carrots with the lid on. the meal really never gets served.
James Djinn it isn’t a fish eye lens. Theres not a single time time it would indicate that, the rocket it straight at the edges of the screen. Boom. No fisheye. Now go back to high school and learn basic shapes. Excuse me, maybe kindergarten.
Video conveniently cuts out at 1:29, rocket turns and Flys parallel about halfway through the climb (suprise suprise) and video conveniently ends when engines "cut off". Everything you would expect from a rocket not going to space. Thanks!
***** It needs to go into a circular orbit around the Earth. This can't be accomplished by traveling straight up, the rocket need to propel the payload at trajectory so it can circle the Earth. It starts as straight up and slowly transitions to a circular orbit, the vehicle will be traveling approx. 18000MPH for low Earth orbit.
Chris Barth Thanks for the reply. Some suspect that low Earth orbit, or about 400 miles, is the ceiling for rocketry. Is there a video of one flying straight up for 4 minutes?
Im sure its been done but I never searched for anything like that. Are you looking for a video of a ballistic trajectory instead of orbital? Im having a hard time understanding the 400 mile limit thing. Could you elaborate?
+onefodderunit I just watched this video via another uploader and had the same thing.. it maxxed out with less than a 16th inch bulge but why does this video cut less then the 5 min mark? For me I only need to see truly uncut footage and I will never look back - but this is fish eye, and it is edited for no good reason after the booster jettison, then stops at 4:57. I just want to see it once, and I will leave the FE thing to itself.
Bro you literally can’t find a video of them just going straight up all the way till u see the entire earth, you can’t find a video like that u can only find videos like this that show a quarter of it, I wanna see the entire thing bro
Technically to reach outer space (or leave earth’s orbit) you need to go up to a certain altitude then the rocket curves to use earths gravity to help the rocket slingshot into space. The real reason for that is because of the expanse (firmament) that the heavenly creator made that cannot be broken by man. That’s probably why nasa is in Florida and they most likely land somewhere in the Bermuda Triangle where no one can see the rocket land.
@@darkknight9102 then go to that spot of earth and send up a weather balloon. Bet you when it goes up, the earth will still look the exact same. And you will see that same horizon in a new spot
For those who don't believe Spaceflight is genuine, then this video proves beyond any doubt that we humans have indeed (a) reached space, and (b) Apollo Missions landed men on The Moon, and brought them back. Full Credit, both to NASA for this video and to the man who posted this video onto TH-cam when he did.
First of all there is a noticable curve in the video. Unless you had a poor education and did not leave the difference between curve and flat. Second it's possible to burn for in space. Some rocket carry oxygen with them to burn the fuel. If only there was a place where you can search up anything. Cough cough internet cough cough.
+DMO DMO ?? I literally spelled out the exact reason you dont see satellites... they are too small to be seen hundreds of miles away. YOur eyes nor the camera can resolve them.
2,271 Satellite orbiting the Earth and we never seen at least One Satellite, and they were using the same reason that they are too small, grain of sand.
A lot of pushback for having an idea. Name calling and calling someone stupid? The majority of people in the United States had the same basic curriculum in school. Usually, if a person were to say something you consider preposterous you simply move on. Taking the time to viciously attack an individual with a different view shows they may have a dog in the fight. I think we can all agree there are things we don't understand while discussing earth. Instead we're shown models and told to deny what our eyes show us. For example, we can't dig past the crust of the earth but we've all seen the mantle and the core in science books. I for one think we should question everything. That's science.
+Jonathan Shaw Everything was cool calm and collected until the flatearthers heard about this video. Look how long it's been on youtube. 7 years !!! A person doesn't need to have a dog in the fight to defend what is true and righteous. This video is the best one for showing that there's no fisheye lens and also getting high enough to show the curvature of the earth. The flatearthers are married to their belief and can't let go, so when confronted with undeniable proof like this, they take it personally and that leads to people calling others names. The most insulting part about the comments from the flatearthers is they try to deny the reality they are seeing with their own eyes. 99.9999999999999% of them didn't think the earth was flat when this video came out. Now that they believe earth is flat, look at all the commotion they started. I don't make many comments but I read a lot and I've never seen a group of people flying under one flag, have so little education. They are low on knowledge too and they say foolish things as a result of believing things by emotion. Emotion has no place in the scientific world. They are disputing a scientific matter from an emotional point of view. What else can you expect but chaos. Take you as an example. Your comment is reasonable and calm but if you believe the Earth is flat, then my comment will eat at your belly. If you believe it's a sphere, you'll just be reading an opinion from some guy called Bart, without any strong emotions. From my experience, the words you chose in your comment are words that we here repeatedly from flatearthers, so I'd stake 10 bucks on you being a flatearther yourself. The worst that can happen is I lose 10 bucks, but I don't think so. My radar's on and I spotted a bogey. Let me know if that 10 bucks is still mine.
The name calling and vicious reaction to flat Earthers is actually a predictable response. This holds true regardless of the true shape of the Earth so let's disregard that for the moment. We have all been conditioned and programmed since we were in kindergarten that the earth is round. I use the term programmed because regardless of any intention, that is the effect. It is a core belief that we all grow up believing is unquestionable and absolutely true. Our minds believe this on the level of something that cannot change sort of like the fact that water is wet and fire is hot. I say that we are programmed because that's what it is. A belief has been woven into our minds to the extent that it is unthinkable that the belief might not be true. Bear with me, this is psychological part. The brain and our personalities have a built-in reaction whenever a core belief of this type is questioned. Our brain knows how important this belief is to our overall system of belief. It is akin to "well if THIS isn't true then WHAT ELSE that I hold dear might not be true!" The reaction is one of anger and ridicule in the form of an attack. This is why practically every so-called "discussion" you will ever see will either immediately or very quickly devolve into name calling and other personal attacks. It is usually on the part of the globe Earth person in the discussion. This has nothing to do with the intelligence or maturity level of the globe Earth person. It is because it is the core belief of the globe Earther that is being challenged and thus their brain that is taking the protective action and causing the emotional response. The flat Earther may reciprocate in the name calling based on their age and maturity level but they rarely, if ever, instigate it. No matter how strongly they may believe their flat Earth theory, it is almost certainly a newly acquired belief and not one that has been nurtured since birth practically. The flat Earther has usually already come through some sort of struggle with belief or facts through research on their journey and confronted the emotions connected to a core belief being disproven. These emotions and the defense mechanisms that the brain uses to try and protect them would come to the defense in this same manner of any core belief that was central enough to our being. Think of it like in the Matrix movie when Neo was first told of the Matrix. He didn't believe it, it couldn't be true. He was disoriented. He was angry. They thought his brain might explode from trying to fathom it all. On a smaller scale, that's the reaction we humans have to a core belief being questioned. This is true regardless of the shape of the Earth. It's human psychology. Research it. Look at the comments in flat Earth videos or articles. You won't find any lengthy scientific or factual discussions. It's just a bunch of name calling over how stupid, uninformed, uneducated or whatever someone must be to hold a certain belief. If you are not invested in either side of the argument it is quite a curious thing to observe. Anyhow, my point was to address why there is so much name calling in discussions of this topic. Bottom line is that it is a self preservation response of the human psyche trying to protect a core belief. It is entirely subconscious and beyond the awareness and control of the person experiencing it. You will have to decide the shape of the Earth for yourself. I have no desire to enter that debate. My brain might explode after all.
Keith Preston: Oh great, very diplomatic of you! Everyone listen to that, we get to decide the shape of the Earth for ourselves! Forget all the learned history, all the science, all the hard work that astronomers, astrophysicists, physicists, astronauts, engineers, etc of past and present have put into amassing and growing our global knowledge base. Forget the hard work these leaders of industry and academia have done to inform and advance modern society for we get to DECIDE THE SHAPE OF THE EARTH FOR OURSELVES!! My money is on square. PS. Regardless of your belief that FE'ers state of (lack of) knowledge is a "self preservation response of the human psyche trying to protect a core belief" is no excuse for an adult to deny reality when presented with copious amounts of evidence and provable truths. We are essentially treading into the territory of mental illness at this stage.
Jonathan Shaw No, that is not science. The name calling comes from the absurdity of what FE jackholes are proposing. Like saying we don't walk on two legs.
+LiLJRAE It burns less higher up because free flames can only form when there's oxygen outside to feed them. Once the oxygen stops being there due to high altitude combustion can no longer be sustained outside the engine's own combustion chamber, so it's no longer visible.
Why does this video cut off? This was headed to Mars 4:57 wasn't enough to prove rockets work ...every video details a certain height of lift before the video magically ends or something else...a screen edit or something...just like 24 he sun in Antartica...or the ISS loop ...it's not live after all
nesymerp1 The pro did you see a nonstop video from earth to fake space i think not. And you never will. Never will never will. I repeat you never will. Wake up my friend
Science and space are two very complicated concepts for flat earthers. Their brains can’t process facts so instead of trying to learn, they prefer to believe some asinine conspiracy theory and fall right in line with the cult.
hello people, I have had lots of complaints that I'm putting up a bogus video. This video is for non profit, it's been uploaded for people who are interested in space exploration, rockets ect...
There is no CGI in this video I have no reason to pull wool over people's eyes, it is what it is. If you don't like it, don't watch it if you are interested then proceed.
999metalme who the fuck would complain about this video? Dumbass people who have got nothing better to do but complain. Keep 'em coming. 😎
Chris Campbell Haha, yeah mate I know, just telling people to pipe down a bit.
Chris Campbell that's right, he did a shitty job with those cgi cumulus nimbus clouds.
Chris Campbell I should of drawn them out on a beer coaster first before I popped them into the cloud drawing machine.
If I was you I would just delete the conspiracy comments.
You can see the exhaust plume get wider and wider as the air gets thinner and thinner.
That is correct, and also explains why there were no blast craters when they landed on the moon. No atmosphere, no direct plume straight down. Just a wide pattern of blowing dust which is what we see in all the moon landing videos.
Does it get shorter and shorter too? You missed that.
Space is so awesome yet so terrifyingly vast and lonely.
it could be soft and fuzzy
@@SeanLives prove it.
Sean Baron / So you one of those huh?
Like uranus
@@SeanLives So anyone could buy a telescope and not see anything like Mars or Venus or any of the visible planets on a low budget telescope?
Notice how the rocket plume and exhaust fumes continue to expand as the altitude is increased. This is a result of the decrease in pressure as the atmosphere thins out. This is an overexpanded supersonic nozzle.
That rocket should've been flying through a soup of Stars, Where's all the billions of Stars? 😂😂 CGI horseshit, we should've seen Stars being left behind like the rocket was flying through a soup of billions of Stars & no spin, no tilt & wobbling, no orbiting the Sun at 67,000mph flying around in circles & no blazing through the galaxy at 500,000mph zooming through space 🤣🤣🤣 wtf is this CGI horseshit?
Hey Flatearthers. Wheres your rocket video?
Sugarloaf Mountain Films
Seen plenty
DanRsturboS1 So if there’s plenty, where are they? You haven’t answered Sugerloaf Mountain Films great question.
DanRsturboS1 Where? Oh let me guess, NASA bribed TH-cam to take them down...
Sugarloaf Mountain Films
Some flat earth guy launched himself into a rocket in order to prove that the earth is flat. His rocket blew up and fell right into the ground along with him.
Eli S. Ramirez
If during that launch the Earth is filmed or photographed, showing that it is spherical, it is.
I always wanted the camera to be put in front of the rocket.
what you expect to see if the camera mount in font off the rocket?
Hoping to see the sky, the star and the truth. The world is round like a globe or flat like floor. I just want the truth. But until then one thing is certain. The knowledge of Allah the All mighty god is way so superior than the human kind.
what evidence your god Allah exist?
what Allah create for human kind? zero
what human create? All technology you use
Allah lost
Whats your evidence for "darkness"? It does exist right? But you can't see it.
you dont exist you never watch yourself being born
...I came here for the flat earth comments
Booooooo! I wanted to write exactly what you've written... but I'll still give it a like.
Well here’s one. It’s fake.
This is low earth orbit not outerspace lol
Schriz lol
I'm afraid there is no Earth.
Globulists and Flatulists are in league to convince us that there's actually such a place as Earth.
THEY WILL FAIL!!!!!
:)
'we'll have flying cars in the future'
2018: 'earth is flat'
The two are not mutually exclusive.
Yeah it’s so stupid
No.....people drink too much 😂
@Randy Smith 😂😂😂😂
Still no flying cars
I enjoy how the exhaust gas expands as the outside air pressure dies off.
If you enjoy that you should try playing bingo, you won't be able to contain yourself
Must be awesome to leave this world and look at it from the outside.
Sort of like a movie I imagine
Did they show them leave?
@@booboo4ever24 nope, it hit the firmament and began to descend before video cut off. All the videos end like that
@@dimvieselIdiot there is no such thing as firmament get out of your Bible fantasy u brain amputated moron🤡🤡
Notice how it's freezing on the outside of the rocket.
It is, but it's not noticeable, that's not the reason why you see ice buildup. That's because the rocket uses cryogenic propellant and oxidizer. That's why you see it on the main stage, but not on the boosters or the upper stage. The boosters use solid fuel, and the upper stage uses a hypergolic mixture, so both are stored at room temperature. The main stage though, uses cryogenic RP1 and LOX.
When the ice begins to vanish as the rocket enters space, that is due to the vaporization of the water to steam as the vacuum lowers the boiling point to below the freezing point, and the sun increasing the temperature of the ice enough to sublimate it. Water takes a lot of energy to boil or sublimate, though, which means a lot of the bigger chunks stay.
@algol29 Obvious troll is obvious.
@algol29 Well, the answer to your question is very simple. The scientific community didn't "eliminate" ether "to make Einstein's theories work", but rather because it was complete nonsense.
As to how rockets impulse themselves and turn, the answer is fairly simple: Newton's third law. You talked a bunch of nonsense about friction ... that's not how any of this works. You don't need to impulse yourself off of anything. Any action has an equal and opposite reaction. Rockets shoot gas out very fast, and the equal and opposite reaction to that is the rocket moving in the opposite direction of the gas coming out of it. In order to point where they want to go, some use gimbaling (ie, moving the engine nozzle, so the gas shoots out in a different direction, altering the rocket's direction), or they use RCS thrusters, basically tiny ports that shoot out compressed nitrogen, thereby applying a force on the rocket through the same principle.
Simple enough?
@algol29 LAWS of motion are not "bound to Earth". There isn't a caveat that says * oh this only works in an atmosphere. That isn't how LAWs work. Equal and opposite. Fire a gun in a vacuum chamber. Would you feel recoil or not? Of course you would. Friction is counter to motion.
It always amazes me how small the blue atmosphere is.
The rocket has to surpass the moon to be fully outside of earths atmosphere 🗣💯💯
@@PoundBaby6out by the moon there would only be a few atoms in a cubic meter of space, that's hardly inside the atmosphere lol
The Karman line is pretty much where 99% of the atmosphere is below you.
@@JohnV170 there’s another layer or 2 of atmosphere above the moon 💯lol!
@@PoundBaby6 there is no "layers" of atmosphere. It's a pressure gradient.
@@JohnV170 atmospheric pressure 🥸duh
Notice how the rocket exhaust gets wider as the air gets thinner ? The air actually restricts the exhaust gasses but when it gets out of the atmosphere the rocket actually works more efficiently.
Is is true rocket thrusters don't work in a vacuum?
Okay, I viewed space launches from several Sci-Fi movies including Armageddon, Intergalactic and even Spacecamp. in each case they actually used real footage from real rocket launches mixed with computer animation. The computer animation is much more polished and and uses quick succession of angle and view changes. If you know what you're looking at it's pretty easy to discern.. so yes this video is 100% real..
The way that the jet emissions start to thin and spread out as the atmosphere thins is just incredible to watch.
Searched for that comment👍🤟
They’re Engines not Jets but yeah its pretty cool to see
I love how calm that man announces the stages of launch. It shows how well people can really work together if they are patient, respectful and optimistic with each other. It's not like in the sci-fi movies where everyone goes, 'WE'RE LAUNCHING NOWW!!' Or whenever there's a 'launch,' it's always a weapon. I think it'd be great to have more sci-fi movies where there isn't any war and it's all just exploration and fun stuff! Why does it always have to be so serious?
Sounds to me like you would LOVE interstellar homie
@@thugmctwist I probably would. 😄 I love Hans Zimmer and my sister loves that movie, too. But from what I know, it's super sad, huh?
@@julianneloy6010 Yes however it’s 100% worth the watch!
You might be interested in the Mundane Science Fiction subgenre, especially the slice-of-life media
You sound like someone from a nother planet. Observing the going on of humans.
Why does the video cut at 4:58, it was just getting interesting
+Robert Kitchen Maybe because it was just getting too much interesting ;)
+Robert Kitchen agreed. Some actual footage of space would do alot to backup the claim nasa can actually go there. . . . The apollo stuff doesn't cut it for me.
+Robert Kitchen Considering that MECO (main engine cut-off) had just happened, my guess is that the stage was spent at that point so it was jettisoned, and the camera was attached to it.
+Jay Last What about the ISS live feed?
***** Well duh, you _need_ to go sideways to reach orbit. Orbit means moving sideways so fast that as you "fall", the ground curves faster than you fall, so you keep "missing" it.
1. absolutely amazing upload
2. peruse down to the comments and pour my freshly melted butter over my popcorn.
I like how you can tell the air is getting thinner because the exhaust plume slowly expands
Are you telling me that it all this time there wasn't one rich flat earther who rented a helicopter and went to the edge of the ice where the world ends supposedly and filmed what was on the other side as space being there?
My best proof of a globe shaped Earth is that if it were flat and the sun and moon hovered above this flat disc, they sun and moon would start off very small in the sky each day and night and as they move through the sky they will get bigger and bigger until they are as directly above you as possible. After that, when they start moving away they would get smaller and smaller until they disappeared. They do not do this. They stay the same size and even look larger as they come up or go down sometimes and this is not possible with the flat Earth theory. Also, a lunar eclipse is impossible. A lunar eclipse happens far more often than a solar eclipse. The Earth's shadow on the moon. If both su nand moon hovered above the disc, how do we have a lunar eclipse? A solar eclipse would still be possible, but not a lunar eclipse because the sun would have to somehow get to the other side of the disc which would make it night time all over the world at the same time, cast the shadow and then hop back over to the proper side. I can't believe this is something that people even think about these days. I almost wonder if the government pays these so called flat Earth people just to start shit so we will never all be able to work together. It was probably the government that started all this flat Earth bullshit lol. People are so fucking dumb. A little bit of logic is all it takes to know the planet isn't flat, but they must not be capable of that. I love how they say we should question everything and not just blindly follow the "globe Earth bullshit" yet they blindly follow something as fucking stupid as the Earth being flat. We are failing as a species lol. Maybe we should've blown up the planet and started over from scratch.
All the governments around the world have control of Antarctica and nobody is just allowed to go there like that. Research Admiral Byrd he went on a expedition there and discovered more than just that the earth is flat,why do you think all of the world leaders meet there? Research it on here
He would've filmed it with a potato.
Eric Talkington Exactly! Very good points you’ve made there!
@@erictalkington5674 You shouldn't despair like you do at the end of your comment.
All that is happening is that the internet has made us all suddenly aware of how stupid many people actually are, even though it has always been that way.
It also shows that new communication methods can spread bad ideas just as much as they can spread good ideas.
But just like the printing press, the overall results will be beneficial fairly quickly - and permanently.
the comments on this video are exhausting.
I like these comment sections. I can get the urge to argue out of my system in arguments which have zero actual bearing on real life, and sometimes it even makes me think about my preconceptions and refresh my memory when trying to think of a way to frame my comments.
Although I admit that sometimes the very vocal minority of flat earthers makes me a little sad at how far some of us seem to have backslid.
agreed
@@kashre
IKR!! ... I mean WTF??
Then up your reading skills
@@kashre Yeah. I like to play around with those flat Earth idiots
Whoever says this is CGI seriously needs to call 911 to get the fire brigade to come and pull their head out of their ass!!!
Why don't they show what's in front of it? Why do they only show us earth? I wanna see the direction in front of it. Cgi as fuck
You can only see the fairing if you pointed up, dumbass
You can only see the fairing if you pointed up, dumbass
***** You talking to me? If so, Ever heard of the TH-cam App on mobile? If so you should now theres a bug that says the comment hasnt been posted, But in reality, it has, And just like any other FE's, You only came back with insults and no proof whatsoever, And you even upvoted your own comment! You're pathetic, And before you reply to me, If your only thought process is insults dont you even dare reply to me;
***** Yeah, Google ruins everything
I'm headed to the restroom to get "good separation on all four solids". 1:33 . Lol
There's always someone like you, isn't there?
Thank goodness.
🤣🤣
Mission Control! Mission Control! Weenie Rocket has gone Rogue! Repeat! Weenie Rocket has gone Rogue!! *pee flies everywhere
@@Elburion i believe correct protocol at that point is to self destruct the rocket to prevent explosion on ground.
Eww I didn't need to imagine that
Thank you so much for this incredible footage!!!
I can’t find any videos of an uninterrupted rocket takeoff the shows it leaving earth and eventually showing earth in the distance
That’s because barley any rockets go higher than 400KM, you wanna see a video with earth in the distance? Search up the spaceX Dart mission.
@@benzene_sandwich
Thanks. I just want a video to shut up the flat earther idiots.
I'm 47 and this is still unbelievable to watch...
Flat earthers be like “nice graphics”........
@So No are you a real "flat earther"? or just trolling? i cant believe that some people are still believing that earth is flat. Please, are you guys (flat earthers) joking or what? i believe human nowadays are not that dumb. Please stop these jokes, its not funny!
So No
You be like, "I flunked my ass out of math and Science and I gotta get back at them."
i dont need NASA or anything man.. i just can prove it to myself with my cheap Celestron Powerseeker 60AZ telescope! i can see if our earth is a globe by seeing a lunar eclipse one month ago (mid August). I can see the shadow that earth is round. I can see with my cheap telescope that moon is 1000% globe, because it have curvy shadow (disc will never have curvy shadow), i can see Mars with my telescope, its like a ball not disc. Saturn, it really has a ring that go around it.. if its not a ball or globe, the ring will not be like that. Etc. So, why only earth is flat if other planets are like a ball you dumb dumb? thats more than enough proof! except for an unsound mind people.
I climbed many mountain in my country (Mt. Lawu, Mt. Slamet, Mt. Salak, Mt. Rinjani, etc.) if i see the horizon, it really curvy not flat!!! thats a proof.
My father have a yacht, so twice a month i ride it and once i see a tanker ship goes by with my binocular, the bottom is gone first, are you telling me that sea is flat?
Commercial airplane (the simplest).. you can see it with your fucking own eye that the horizon is not flat. its curvy.
Flat earth? wheres the proof? man, i think you are being serious.. not joking. I suggest you to go to a doctor to check your damaged brain.
@So No there are proof, but you do not have that simple.inteligence to understand. Go to school. Never hesrd of time zones, curved rainbows, horizon that disapears, planes, atmosphere abover your head and falling in the horizon, wind, moon that changes position, seizons, sun, days, snow in winter. Etc.
I can't see a reason why people would need to pretend the Earth is not flat, if indeed it is. Where's the gain?
If you think about it, this is actually scary to watch but incredible at the same time.
Why scary?
@@thetrashtalktvshow You never know if the spaceship will crash, explode, or malfunction in the launch process and just watching from their POV also adds a little more anxiety for me lol
@@pencilsniper lol overthinking it
@@thetrashtalktvshow lmao probably 😂
What is amazing is this is so routine now . I am nearly 80 when I was a child this would have been seen as science fiction ! I remember a conversation with a scientist . When I was a child , who was researching atomic energy. He said we would never get to the moon it was imposable !
welshpete12 you’re 80 and still haven’t learned how to spell impossible?
same here now spacex are doing dozens of launches and landing boosters routinely its incredible and what's more incredible is people still say its fake,
He was lying to you about being a scientist. Scientists don't say "impossible".
rstevewarmorycom
About 70 years ago scientists didn't know what the hell was possible and not possible
But I guess they're smarter than us now since nobody thought the earth was flat back then
thats probably why he was a mathematician and not a scientist. in science you must be able to admit you are wrong otherwise youre holding everyone else back.
Hello Flat-Earth Theorists, I just KNOW you are here. I have a serious question for you: Why WOULD NASA / government / illuminati / saucer-people / whoever actually WANT us to believe the Earth is a spheroid instead of flat? What is the possible reward to them, for maintaining such a complicated scheme over centuries? And why would EVERY nation participate in it?
it's all squares and triangles, circles keeps us going around in loops is why. :) have a nice day.
@HumansRstupid More like you are stupid you brainwashed freak. How about stop living in your mom's basement and go buy yourself a telescope. You can see other planets like saturn and jupiter. Why tf other planets are round but not Earth. People like you seriously need to go back to school because you are a uneducated clown.
To lie about the true nature of creation, our significance in creation, to elevate scientist above the Word of God which tells us a conflicting account and description of the earth and cosmology!
It doesn’t matter what shape the earth is, the human species will destroy it regardless. 🤦🏻♀️💁🏻♀️
imagine flat earthers now when they have to have social distancing. They are afraid that someon might fall off the edge of the earth
Shape of the earth aside... Seeing how fast these vehicles can get into space is kind blowing. I'd hate to he behind those boosters lol
This is amazing! Are there more videos like it? I would love to see :)
I've always wondered, where exactly does those engines fall to when, they detach themselves?
ocean
Bermuda
@@Divin3ether Every time?
@@GODs_Son777 Nope. It’s somewhat random but almost certainly somewhere on the ocean.
You can literally see the Water Freeze on the outside of the Rocket and then Melt and eventually just break off what didn't melt earlier, ALL in real time
And people still call it fake
SleepingGiant
It didn't even melt, it SUBLIMED, flash evaporated directly from a solid into a gas, proving it was in a vacuum!!
th-cam.com/video/LHO55oxVMOU/w-d-xo.html
@HumansRstupid how you know if your flat earth is real or fake. Might aswell trave to "the edge" and film it, or is the "Ice Wall" too high
Really cool video, thanks for the upload. I am always struck by how "easy" and almost mundane a space launch seems, but they are anything BUT. The complexity of the equipment, the brilliant men and women who make this stuff happen...amazing.
This looks incredible. I hope someday anyone will be able to go to space. Id definitely go if It were available.
INSIDE A ROCKET!!!
External footage only.........
Spectacular video! Thank you for uploading!
4:22 - 4:26 "Velocity OVER9000 miles per hour" VEGETA?! IS THAT YOU!
fuck that's fast lol
The speed when it is in orbit is 16000 miles per hour
BravoTwoZero Sadek 😂😂😂
Which has fuck all to do with the future price of pork bellies....
BravoTwoZero Sadek nice one
I like how all of the condensed water on the surface of the rocket froze as it continues to rise up high in the sky, then in space
Excellent.
Shame it ended so soon. Last velocity call was about 9,000 mph, but orbital speed is over 17,000 mph (5 miles per second) - how did it achieve orbital speed after that 2nd-stage engine cut off?
+forestsoceansmusic That wasnt the second stage... we only saw the first stage. The second stage had yet to be burned.
+Ddub1083
Ta, I got confused when they said the camera was on the 2nd Stage. Still a great clip.
Shame it doesn't go all the way to orbit insertion.
+forestsoceansmusic
Boosters count as 1st stage, so the 2nd stage is the "main" engine, who is light since the beginning.
1:25 you want to see a continuous shot from earth to space, but not this time...
Yeah WTF was that @1:29 ?
@@mikej9089 traces from the aux thrusters leaving the main Rocket after the First stage of Flight
@@ggdszzvx0509 how convient
I don't think it's bogus. I think it's quite fascinating, especially with the external cameras on the rocket. Awesome video. Thanks for posting this 999metalme.
the rocket stops going up and away from the earth and starts going across before cutting out.probably cuts out right wea you would notice it hit a wall
RIGHT
@@filipeemerick4483 notice earth stays the same size doesnt get smaller rocket just changes angle.thats as far as they can go lol.no one has ever been to the moon.space exploration blows
@ desperate in what way.clearly pointing out that theas no full view of earth from any footage of any launch from start to finish.launch to space with full footage earth as a whole..no..point is why not.theyv been into deep space havnt they?...the moon...do you know of any footage?oh just snipits and shortfilms oh what they couldnt afford 24/7 4k camers to film any mission recently.yeh ok.oh and im not a flat earther btw just think nasa is full of shit and ppl are dumb enough to believe thea money is being spent on "real" space exploration.what a joke
@ gofast 2014 rocket? so have u seen full footage from launch to deep space unedited no cuts.. no 1 minute launch footage to all of sudden in space landing on the moon lol..when did they last go to the moon? oh the say they dont evn have technology to get the thea rite now 2019....seems your the desperate one..to proud or something? find the rest of this video wea it shows the rest of the mission.wea does the rocket go after this video ends...?
@ would of hit a wall.it stops...as in the footage stops ......u follow? weas the rest of the footage.iv been sifting and cant find the full footage of every single nasa rocket launch.have u seen them? no firmament..have u been up thea? have u seen the footage? once again why do all nasa rocket launch to deep space exploration only have cut scenes...yawn no1 wants to answer this they just keep defend all the irrelevant "points"
you're all nuts, its a cube. square pointy edges and everything. I've been on a boat........trust me.
you r right...i balloon a Lot and once i almost died when the balloon was punctured when i got too close to the pointy edge...but i coasted to Australia and made it back home,,it is a cube.
Clevon Forrester
glad you made it back safe fellow adventurer !
Yes, this simulation happens in something that we would call a black box. ( Like the big black stone in Mecca)
I'd sit on the side of the rocket with a chair attached to it like in KSP in front of the camera
WHEEEE!!!!!
I would let you.
can someone please give me a link to a spaceship leaving earth with zero cuts in between?
if you find it can you please forward it?
This is the only thing we should be discussing in my opinion. This needs to be public demand. It's 2018. I don't know what we live on, but I'm starting to belive it's impossible to put cameras on a rocket. How many things have we launched into space? Wouldn't you think you could make bank of video nobody possesses.
Look at the footage from SpaceX
At 4 minutes this rocket is 5 times further down range then in altitude just like all the others, heading out to sea. No wonder they cut the film short.
@@Flat_Earth_101 can you tell me why the shadow on the moon is always curved? How about lunar eclipses? How do tides work? Can you explain how long haul flights are possible on a flat earth model? Why can you see farther as you increase in elevation on earth if it is flat? Why do parts of the world experience different seasons at the same time? Why are different stars visible in different parts of the world?
Notice the vent right in front of the camera. Look at how the water changes form in space! So fascinating!!
Love this stuff! Such a great "ride" up with the rocket!
damn, same video cut at 4:57!! UGH. where is a nice one hour long neutral lens video, to put it to rest??
You really think that it's ME that needs convincing? No. I want the video I suggest for the benefit of those who refuse to believe we are going to space.
Mind how you talk to grown ups bro.
+Tommy Lourdes Here's a good one for that. If they claim this video is fake, then they must also believe the Russians are in on the hoax.
www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/09/13/soyuz_launch_rocket_cams_provide_a_stunning_view.html
+brabanthallen awesome video thanks for the link. Suppose all the FE guys will say it's fake..... Sigh.
my goal is to find video that puts
FE to rest. The footage I need as a keynote would show unedited footage of a payload being ejected far enough out from the earth that from launch to the point where it is clear the earth is a sphere is apparent... I wonder if it isn't something an amateur rocket might be able to pull off..? maybe a few cameras. with simple radio downlink and gps to facilitate telemetry? It would certainly be something I would help fund - a one way ticket to the moon or interstellar space, or better yet, into the sun, out of the earths orbital path...
Tommy Lourdes Today, Oct 21, 1 day after the youtube count of 515,000 flat Earth videos, it now shows 538,000, an increase of 33,000 overnight, yet way less than 100 have been uploaded today???
Got an ideas of what's going on?
WOW. ..amazing footage ..you can almost feel the power of that thing taking off 😃
For on the screen now was a strange sight, a great pallid plain of stone… the edge of the plain flashed with the brightness of light on water, light across a distant sea. The stone plain was no longer plain but hollow, like a huge bowl full of sunlight. As he watched it grew shallower, spilling out its light. All at once a line broke across it, abstract, geometric, the perfect section of a circle. Beyond that arc was blackness. This blackness reversed the whole picture, made it negative. The real, the stone part of it was no longer concave and full of light but convex, reflective, rejecting light. It was not a plain or a bowl but a sphere, a ball of white stone falling down in blackness, falling away. It was his world.
See the smoke when it takes off...
that's what the amount of smoke a ford passes when it turns on.
Ford was a straight shooter. Nixon, and now Trump, pass lots of smoke...and other gases, during and after turn on...just sayin'
leroytheboss you should know the joke rules. They have to be related to the content... gosh
you can see the curve of the earth, all you have to do is LOOK AT IT.
i see a curve, you guys are so insane to believe the earth is flat my lordy
rick and morty season 3 episode 7
rick and morty season 3 episode 7
To close to see the curve the horizon has to come around to meet itself or the horizon would look like the golden arches! Wake up and think outside the box!!!! You have to be a thousand miles or more away to see the curve! They don't go above 275 miles according to them!
wayne you have to go up 35 km to see the curve
U can't use logic with someone who believe the Earth is flat. We all know it's a triangle. Illuminati confirmed 😂😂😂
1:42 does anyone notice that the rocket looks a bit more animated after the cut an why didn’t it show the break away? Seems kinda sus to me.
Why did the video cut off to a blank gray before showing a simulated video?
How did the camera survive all that?
You should see the nuclear test videos, those cameras are built different
It's interesting how the ice behaves. It looks like it sublimates and then flakes off in small pieces due to the low pressure.
In orbit under 4 mins?
Give it a few more minutes and you'll be alright.
Tramseskumbanan it doesn’t take long to reach a low earth orbit for a rocket that travels 7.9 kilometers per second which is several times the speed of sound, and the further up in the atmosphere you rise the lower pressures you have to fight against.
DonkeyFilms It still needs a few more minutes to reach low earth orbit.
I think a record holder is the Titan II Gemini that had meco in about 5:34 minutes.
The astronauts were then exposed to up to 8G.
US shuttle: 8:25
Titan IB: 10
Saturn V Apollo: 12
Soyuz: 9
For launch vehicles that carry (or used to carry) upper stages such as the Titans, Ariane V, Delta IV, AtlasV and Proton M it usually take a few more minutes.
1:53 It's so easy to see how the planet is a (oblate) spheroid as you see it's radius take up more and more screen space.
*I am questioning myself...*
How come there are people who actually believe the Earth is _flat_ ? How did it even started?
I am sorry for the questions but I'm just curious tho..
Cause there are tons of "myth busting" TH-cam Channels talkin shit the whole day long and as soon as enough people told the Same thing, stupid retards started to believe that.
I guess its the same way how religion started.
How can the earth be flat is the centre molten core is larger then the earths moon.
not just that but we are still waiting for an official video of someone at the edge of the flat Earth to prove us all wrong. Its simple, some people are just idiots and love to live in constant conspiracy theories. These are the same now against 5G, against coronavirus but they get infected and run to the doctors
if people think the earth is flat the only way to prove it is by making a video of something leaving earth and seeing it in full view in orbit 🎉
I wish I could leave this planet. Like forever.
you can. Jesus is the way out.
you taking to me hung sing? Well in case you didn't know Heaven is away from the earth. educate yourself before throwing around childish insults. you're just making yourself look the fool
shae butter you can tell Jesus that when you meet him face to face. have fun with that brother
whatever you say butter
the only thing that is dead is those who do not believe in Christ. don't drag friends and family to the pit just because you are decieved.. it's dark and hell is hot.
Nothing against this particular video, I've watched like 5 now, but Is there ANY video someone can point me to that shows continuous travel (no cuts) from earth to space and then keeps going long enough to see the entire globe? Why do all of them stop at low altitudes where you can't actually see the whole thing?
There is no vantage point from which you can see the whole entire Earth. At best, you could only see half of it. To answer your question, the overwhelming vast majority of these launches that have footage are going into low Earth orbit. We don't launch rockets directly into higher orbits than this. They first get into low Earth orbit, and when systems are checked and other processes are completed, they then do more burns to place things destined for higher orbits into those orbits later.
So, what you see in all rocket launches are payloads being put into low Earth orbit. The radius of the Earth is about 3,960 miles. Most things we put into low Earth orbit are at about 250 miles away. This is the equivalent to being a quarter inch away from a basketball. How much of that basketball can you see from a quarter inch away?
@@willoughbykrenzteinburg what about all the rockets we are sending past "low earth orbit" in particular we just sent a helicopter to Mars so where is the continuous footage of the journey from Earth to Mars and seeing (from a mounted 360 degree camera) the view of earth from lift off until it becomes a tiny speck like how Mars is to us from here. To me that doesn't seem to be much to ask for and with all that money funded into it I am surprised no space agency has proven it just to shut the flat earthers up... We have a feed to the rovers so sending a video of the journey really is not that hard to accomplish.
Because you can’t actually see the whole thing due to the firmament dome.
@@jasonanderson6491 continual footage from earth to mars? How much storage do you think they have? The rovers were inside the rocket
Flat earthers, just explain southern celestial pole and moon being upside down on SH and i will believe anything.
*****
The problem is, in reality, the Moon isn't oriented as it was on ceiling. If that was the case, moon would be elipse almost all the time due to angle of view.
This wouldn't be possible:
i.stack.imgur.com/ulPd2.jpg
Also, your model has another big flaw. Yes, i can look 2 different orientations of the paper from 2 opposite sides of the room, but if i move 90° from my current point, i will se another orientation of the paper. Actually, if i move around the room, i can see many different orientations of it.
In reality, we can only see 2 different orientations.
Sorry, but try again.
*****
Your respond is totally irrelevant to what i wrote. Please adress my whole point and don't copy-paste what your god Eric says. When you fully respond to my post, i will respond to what you said.
*****
You are totally not. You can't even think properly.
One need only look at the ludicrous FE model most commonly cited by FErs to see a literally glaring problem. The sun is shown as a spotlight source. There are no known existing spotlight sources in the universe. In addition, it could be night on flat world but the sun would still be visible even if the observer is on the opposite edge of flat world. There is a reason the sun is said to be 3,000 miles high and 32 miles in diameter. Those are the figures required to make the sun appear roughly the same diameter no matter where and observer on flat world is. Not to mention a spotlight source had to be invoked in order to light the Earth partially. Otherwise, there would be no night.
Andrew Jackson: Sunspots do not make the sun a spotlight. The sun illuminates any object in whatever direction said object (Planet, moon etc.) happens to be in it's orbit, making it omnidirectional. Sunspots are relatively few and far between. Spotlights are sources such as flashlights or studio lights. They have large parts of their light source mechanically obscured to point in a certain direction. The Earths weather is the reason for variations in temperature. Furthermore, there are plenty of places where the temps are so cold like Antarctica, that it could actually be opposite in terms of temperature. Other problems with flat world include eclipse problems. The most commonly cited flat world with the sun and moon travelling in the same orbit at the same altitude is this. Solar eclipses would be impossible because the moon would collide with the sun. Lunar eclipses would also be impossible because the Earth never passes between the sun and moon as it does in an actual lunar eclipse. Even if the Earth did pass between the sun and moon as it does in other FE models, the eclipse would be visible all over flat world. Real lunar eclipses are not visible around the entire planet. An example would be the upcoming July 27, 2018 lunar eclipse visible From Europe, Africa, the Mideast and other nearby countries, but not the US, Canada etc. Here's more. The space station has been photographed by amateur astronomers globally. This would not be possible in flat world because the space station was built with a spherical body in mind. I realize your FE beliefs may be Biblically based. But here's the problem with that. The Bible refers or alludes to 3 different Earth shapes. Job 26:7 alludes to a spherical Earth. Revelation 7:1 and Isaiah 11:12 says Earth has 4 corners. Spheres and discs do not have corners. I was unable to find the passage that suggests Earth is a disc. But even if there was such a passage, which one of these is correct? I suspect the disc shape came into existence because someone long ago realized the shape of Earths shadow during a lunar eclipse indicates a spherical Earth. So a disc was invoked to explain the shadow away. But FE proponents failed to explain what I bring up here. I have plenty more but this post is getting lengthy.
If you watch closely it’s stops rising at a certain point .. once it hits the firmament and just begins to move in a forward motion
Nope, this can't be seen in the footage at all.
Have you always been an ignorant and gullible flat earth believing fool?
What firmanent are you talking about?
This launch is a bittersweet launch. Such a beautiful launch to be ruined by mission failure when the Orbiter plunged into the Martian atmosphere because of a fucking conversion mistake between metric (SI) and imperial units.
+Revanchist8525 That is why everybody should use Metric :p
+Revanchist8525 It was bothering me that they were calling out the velocity in mph. I was trying to roughly translate to m/s. Science is no place for a clumsy unit system defined by a better one. A mile is exactly 1,609.344 metres since 1959.
+Michael Frederiksen I prefer metric too. But they were probably narrating (and still are) the launch in imperial for the general public's sake. NASA has learned from this stupid mistake! I know that they're now going metric for all mission operations since 2007.
+Michael Frederiksen How many meters are in 1/3 of a kilometer? How many feet are in 1/3 of a mile? Which one gives a more accurate answer?
Are you making a joke? Either answer can be as accurate as you'd like. The math for km to m is much more simple. Without a calculator, there are 333 1/3 metres in 1/3 of a kilometre.
How many inches are in 1/500th of a mile. Anyone can do the metric equivalent without a calculator. Answer is 126 ft 8 21/32" to the nearest 1/32 of an inch which is not only a pain to calculate, but also difficult to type.
The problem with Imperial is which units to use? decimal miles? decimal feet? decimal inches? 1/32 inches? thousandths? a combination of the above? There need be no distinction in metric: To change units you simply move the decimal place.
1296 flat earthers couldn't handle this footage
It's fake
@@randymccall304 no
Oh yeah fake
Hmmm... I must've missed the part where it hits the dome.
Right @2:22
@@Doug_Gilmour didnt see 😂
Did they keep going up?
@@booboo4ever24 No, it stopped. But I didn't see any stupid dome.
@@responsibleparty whyd it stop? Wheres the thousands of satellites?
How my parents went to school when they were young
Excellent vid. Title slightly misleading. Most rockets take around 9 minutes to reach orbit. The video does not show stage 1 separation which has to occur well before reaching orbit, otherwise, there'd be no need for additional stages.
Exactly. The video makes claim of an orbiting rocket; yet it ends at several thousand MPH LESS than that needed to reach orbital velocity.
The claim is made by whomever posted this vid because he or she put in into their title. They probably have no idea when a rocket reaches orbit. This has nothing to do with any sort of fakery. If you can actually launch a rocket, which millions have seen shuttle and Saturn-V launches, it wouldn't be terribly difficult to put a camera along the airframe or inside the propellant tank dome area and get video.
44 minutes to get this into its transfer orbit. The video shows stage 1 separation a few seconds before it ends. The camera is on that part and begins tumbling back to earth.
Solid rocket boosters dropping off IS the first stage separation. Parallel staging.
Booster rocket separation is the 'Stage One' that you refer to. Not all rockets are built on the Apollo model.
So this rocket made it to about the same spot as the Red Bull skydiver, and you expect me to believe we’ve been to the moon and are going to mats?
Mats?No.Mars?Yes.
where is the front view i wanna see stars and galaxies :)
With the suns light beaming at earth at that area. You wouldnt see any. The sunds light overpowers the rest of it. However if it were the other side where its night. You would definitely see the stars
I thought the earth might crash in to the rocket...as it wasn't going as fast as the earth and galaxy...
Just look up at nighttime?
where is the rest of the footage? if this footage was cooking a meal all you would get is boiling carrots with the lid on. the meal really never gets served.
James Djinn it isn’t a fish eye lens. Theres not a single time time it would indicate that, the rocket it straight at the edges of the screen. Boom. No fisheye. Now go back to high school and learn basic shapes. Excuse me, maybe kindergarten.
please tell me where you got this footage, many thanks
Video conveniently cuts out at 1:29, rocket turns and Flys parallel about halfway through the climb (suprise suprise) and video conveniently ends when engines "cut off". Everything you would expect from a rocket not going to space. Thanks!
Wow awesome hi never see something like this before... Amazing👏😯👍💯💯💯
The horizon stabilizes at 2:20 and it's flying fairly level with a nose up attitude. Why?
***** It needs to go into a circular orbit around the Earth. This can't be accomplished by traveling straight up, the rocket need to propel the payload at trajectory so it can circle the Earth. It starts as straight up and slowly transitions to a circular orbit, the vehicle will be traveling approx. 18000MPH for low Earth orbit.
Chris Barth Thanks for the reply. Some suspect that low Earth orbit, or about 400 miles, is the ceiling for rocketry. Is there a video of one flying straight up for 4 minutes?
Im sure its been done but I never searched for anything like that. Are you looking for a video of a ballistic trajectory instead of orbital?
Im having a hard time understanding the 400 mile limit thing. Could you elaborate?
Chris Barth An amateur but ground breaking San Diego Astronomer has a video on youtube: Is It Possible To Go Above Low Earth Orbit?
+onefodderunit I just watched this video via another uploader and had the same thing.. it maxxed out with less than a 16th inch bulge but why does this video cut less then the 5 min mark? For me I only need to see truly uncut footage and I will never look back - but this is fish eye, and it is edited for no good reason after the booster jettison, then stops at 4:57. I just want to see it once, and I will leave the FE thing to itself.
Just because people dont believe we can penetrate the atmosphere with a rocket doesn't necessarily mean they think earth is flat.
It's on the same level. Evidence that things leave our atmosphere passes over our heads regularly.
however, it's the same level of stupid.
Bro you literally can’t find a video of them just going straight up all the way till u see the entire earth, you can’t find a video like that u can only find videos like this that show a quarter of it, I wanna see the entire thing bro
For real it feels like we are in the trueman show movie 😬
Technically to reach outer space (or leave earth’s orbit) you need to go up to a certain altitude then the rocket curves to use earths gravity to help the rocket slingshot into space. The real reason for that is because of the expanse (firmament) that the heavenly creator made that cannot be broken by man. That’s probably why nasa is in Florida and they most likely land somewhere in the Bermuda Triangle where no one can see the rocket land.
Hey look it does curve!! Imagine that
Are you blind David , I did not see a globe ! I saw a flat earth ........
Well you see what you see and I see what I see and agree to disagree
@@yeshuaifollow5045 2:12 and beyond you can clearly see a curvature nothing flat
Those comments are so dumb and funny 😂
@@thomasmaxwell1518 the flat earth has a curve also. Dipshit.
When people try to convince me the earth is flat, these types of videos i watch to bring my sanity back after seeing their insane verbal garbage
It looks flat to me
@@darkknight9102 so the horizon is the edge of earth? Lol
@@mactallica9293 It looks like the edge
@@darkknight9102 then go to that spot of earth and send up a weather balloon. Bet you when it goes up, the earth will still look the exact same. And you will see that same horizon in a new spot
We don't have any video that shows from the ground the rocket ascaping earth?
For those who don't believe Spaceflight is genuine, then this video proves beyond any doubt that we humans have indeed (a) reached space, and (b) Apollo Missions landed men on The Moon, and brought them back. Full Credit, both to NASA for this video and to the man who posted this video onto TH-cam when he did.
First of all there is a noticable curve in the video. Unless you had a poor education and did not leave the difference between curve and flat.
Second it's possible to burn for in space. Some rocket carry oxygen with them to burn the fuel.
If only there was a place where you can search up anything.
Cough cough internet cough cough.
Where are all the satellites?
+Dick Plummer Same old troll question asked thousands of times before. Don't be a dumb parrot
+Harry Andruschak wtf is a troll. I'm asking a simple question!
They have no idea how to answer you. Their only reaction is "ridiculing" your queries.
+DMO DMO ?? I literally spelled out the exact reason you dont see satellites... they are too small to be seen hundreds of miles away. YOur eyes nor the camera can resolve them.
2,271 Satellite orbiting the Earth and we never seen at least One Satellite, and they were using the same reason that they are too small, grain of sand.
A lot of pushback for having an idea. Name calling and calling someone stupid? The majority of people in the United States had the same basic curriculum in school. Usually, if a person were to say something you consider preposterous you simply move on. Taking the time to viciously attack an individual with a different view shows they may have a dog in the fight. I think we can all agree there are things we don't understand while discussing earth. Instead we're shown models and told to deny what our eyes show us. For example, we can't dig past the crust of the earth but we've all seen the mantle and the core in science books. I for one think we should question everything. That's science.
+Jonathan Shaw Everything was cool calm and collected until the flatearthers heard about this video. Look how long it's been on youtube. 7 years !!! A person doesn't need to have a dog in the fight to defend what is true and righteous. This video is the best one for showing that there's no fisheye lens and also getting high enough to show the curvature of the earth. The flatearthers are married to their belief and can't let go, so when confronted with undeniable proof like this, they take it personally and that leads to people calling others names. The most insulting part about the comments from the flatearthers is they try to deny the reality they are seeing with their own eyes.
99.9999999999999% of them didn't think the earth was flat when this video came out. Now that they believe earth is flat, look at all the commotion they started.
I don't make many comments but I read a lot and I've never seen a group of people flying under one flag, have so little education. They are low on knowledge too and they say foolish things as a result of believing things by emotion. Emotion has no place in the scientific world. They are disputing a scientific matter from an emotional point of view.
What else can you expect but chaos.
Take you as an example. Your comment is reasonable and calm but if you believe the Earth is flat, then my comment will eat at your belly. If you believe it's a sphere, you'll just be reading an opinion from some guy called Bart, without any strong emotions. From my experience, the words you chose in your comment are words that we here repeatedly from flatearthers, so I'd stake 10 bucks on you being a flatearther yourself. The worst that can happen is I lose 10 bucks, but I don't think so. My radar's on and I spotted a bogey.
Let me know if that 10 bucks is still mine.
The name calling and vicious reaction to flat Earthers is actually a predictable response. This holds true regardless of the true shape of the Earth so let's disregard that for the moment.
We have all been conditioned and programmed since we were in kindergarten that the earth is round. I use the term programmed because regardless of any intention, that is the effect. It is a core belief that we all grow up believing is unquestionable and absolutely true. Our minds believe this on the level of something that cannot change sort of like the fact that water is wet and fire is hot. I say that we are programmed because that's what it is. A belief has been woven into our minds to the extent that it is unthinkable that the belief might not be true.
Bear with me, this is psychological part. The brain and our personalities have a built-in reaction whenever a core belief of this type is questioned. Our brain knows how important this belief is to our overall system of belief. It is akin to "well if THIS isn't true then WHAT ELSE that I hold dear might not be true!" The reaction is one of anger and ridicule in the form of an attack. This is why practically every so-called "discussion" you will ever see will either immediately or very quickly devolve into name calling and other personal attacks. It is usually on the part of the globe Earth person in the discussion. This has nothing to do with the intelligence or maturity level of the globe Earth person. It is because it is the core belief of the globe Earther that is being challenged and thus their brain that is taking the protective action and causing the emotional response. The flat Earther may reciprocate in the name calling based on their age and maturity level but they rarely, if ever, instigate it. No matter how strongly they may believe their flat Earth theory, it is almost certainly a newly acquired belief and not one that has been nurtured since birth practically. The flat Earther has usually already come through some sort of struggle with belief or facts through research on their journey and confronted the emotions connected to a core belief being disproven. These emotions and the defense mechanisms that the brain uses to try and protect them would come to the defense in this same manner of any core belief that was central enough to our being. Think of it like in the Matrix movie when Neo was first told of the Matrix. He didn't believe it, it couldn't be true. He was disoriented. He was angry. They thought his brain might explode from trying to fathom it all. On a smaller scale, that's the reaction we humans have to a core belief being questioned. This is true regardless of the shape of the Earth. It's human psychology. Research it. Look at the comments in flat Earth videos or articles. You won't find any lengthy scientific or factual discussions. It's just a bunch of name calling over how stupid, uninformed, uneducated or whatever someone must be to hold a certain belief. If you are not invested in either side of the argument it is quite a curious thing to observe. Anyhow, my point was to address why there is so much name calling in discussions of this topic. Bottom line is that it is a self preservation response of the human psyche trying to protect a core belief. It is entirely subconscious and beyond the awareness and control of the person experiencing it.
You will have to decide the shape of the Earth for yourself. I have no desire to enter that debate. My brain might explode after all.
Keith Preston salute to you humanoid brother beautiful choice of words on such a controversial topic!
Keith Preston: Oh great, very diplomatic of you! Everyone listen to that, we get to decide the shape of the Earth for ourselves! Forget all the learned history, all the science, all the hard work that astronomers, astrophysicists, physicists, astronauts, engineers, etc of past and present have put into amassing and growing our global knowledge base. Forget the hard work these leaders of industry and academia have done to inform and advance modern society for we get to DECIDE THE SHAPE OF THE EARTH FOR OURSELVES!!
My money is on square.
PS. Regardless of your belief that FE'ers state of (lack of) knowledge is a "self preservation response of the human psyche trying to protect a core belief" is no excuse for an adult to deny reality when presented with copious amounts of evidence and provable truths. We are essentially treading into the territory of mental illness at this stage.
Jonathan Shaw No, that is not science. The name calling comes from the absurdity of what FE jackholes are proposing. Like saying we don't walk on two legs.
why does the exhaust flame etc from the rocket get wider and burn less as it gets higher?
+LiLJRAE Less air pressure.
+LiLJRAE It burns less higher up because free flames can only form when there's oxygen outside to feed them. Once the oxygen stops being there due to high altitude combustion can no longer be sustained outside the engine's own combustion chamber, so it's no longer visible.
because rockets don't work in space
NatureHacker Yeah right.
+NatureHacker Why can't rockets work in space?
Why does this video cut off? This was headed to Mars 4:57 wasn't enough to prove rockets work ...every video details a certain height of lift before the video magically ends or something else...a screen edit or something...just like 24 he sun in Antartica...or the ISS loop ...it's not live after all
Here we go! No flat earth there.
nesymerp1 The pro did you see a nonstop video from earth to fake space i think not. And you never will. Never will never will. I repeat you never will. Wake up my friend
What are you trying to say?
Nesy's parodies don’t mind him 😂
Science and space are two very complicated concepts for flat earthers. Their brains can’t process facts so instead of trying to learn, they prefer to believe some asinine conspiracy theory and fall right in line with the cult.
Nesy's parodies you don't even know which way is up look at that angle
Flat earth or round either way it’s pretty damn spooky we live on a giant rock floating in the middle of god knows what 😳😳😳
There is no footage of anyone leaving here. This video is suspect at best.
Agreed 💯💯💯 and I actually like the objectivity. Either way it's super dope.
flerfers want to think otherwise. they wanna think they're special. poor delusional idiots.
2:30 proof that earth is a Cube
Indeed
Polyhexagonal
Bro, take a closer look
It’s clearly round
@@ashleyy_vi Arrrrr slash _wosh_
JEMKO23 okay? I don’t really know what your trying to say so
Why does a Mars bound rocket go into orbit instead of straight to escape velocity and off to Mars?
Essa saída da atmosfera e entrada no vácuo espacial é espetacular
Soon we'll be sending Flat Earthers into space. Without a space ship.
I'm sure that's what Galleleo would have wanted. To be ostricized from society like he was.
imagine watching this and thinking
_nah this is fake_
Scottis there are people who think that
Just read the comments.
I’m not trying to be rude, sorry if I am...
Wonderful view of Earth's limb?
Good video very interesting. Keep up the good work 🌍🌎🌏
Good video, well ROUNDED 🤣
This is amazing. But I must say that movies looks just as real. As this video. So who’s to say.
_"who’s to say"_
Thousands of people working in satellite industry (or with satellites) maybe?
Seb brown astronauts on the iss say