@@th3lasthop3You are clueless, DLSS 3 input lag only higher when you compare fps to fps..... But reality is DLSS 3 always have higher fps which compensates for Input lag hence you get less input lag than Native....
AMD really is pushing the envelope here. They could have gone the NVIDIA exclusivity route but instead opted to make EVERYONE's life better. Thank you, AMD!
Microsoftis directly compeating by buying studios .Microsoft has tech company money .Sony is the one that cant directly compeat becouse they just dont have the cash to do so . Second Microsoft makes money with game pass anything that has game pass is supportet makes them money .
The engineering behind hardware agnostic yet performant tools like this is fantastic. DLSS might have a year or two lead in terms of visual fidelity, but FSR is more accessible. We need to support this kind of development over the "everything is proprietary" method.
That's idiotic. The whole point of hardware acceleration is software tailored to the hardware. You might as well demand everything be done in software if you think like that. Part of the reason why FSR is inferior is PRECISELY BECAUSE it isn't specifically made for special hardware.
@@Wobbothe3rdHardware acceleration isn't software written for the hardware, it's hardware developed for the software. "Software developed for the hardware" is how drivers work, aka how devs can be sure that their game will work on cards besides the one they developed the game on. But the thing is, as long as the card API is Turing-complete, you can force it to do anything, and hardware will simply decide how well it performs. An open algorithm like FSR allows competitors to tune their hardware to perform better with it; DLSS does not.
Digital Foundry already got to see it behind the stage working on full demos and they are very impressed. Image quality wise, it's comparable to DLSS 3. Richard even wrote an article about it.
@@kishaloyb.7937 it was always going to be on par with DLSS 3... why do you think it went from beginning of the year to end of the year, AMD had to make sure it was ready.
@@ikitclaw8969not sure but maybe op forgot to put "Even" at the start of the sentence so... "Even if", or it's because it's not launching now but early next year so we won't exactly have it till then.
If its true, amd gonna become THE hero that dethroned Intel and ended gpu crisis by both selling cheaper options and releasing fsr 3 meaning that many people wont even need to upgrade for much longer
This could be game changing especially for Xbox, 60 fps Raytracing might happen. At the very least the 60 fps promise that was for this console generation.
What I'm worried about now is that all game developers will start creating games that will force you to use FSR and playing games natively will be a thing of the past unless you have a flagship GPU, really hope that won't happen
FSR 3 is going to hugely benefit iGPUs in the future. With strix point Halo coming out next year, FSR 3 will truly make gaming possible on a thin and portable laptop.
Been with Nvidia for over 12 years now. Next card I'm switching out to AMD, even if the updates come a ways down the line. This is top notch consumer care!
This isn't consumer care lol. This is the only logical decision for a company that cannot produce the hardware to compete on the market. You people don't understand how business competition works and it shows.
This is really awesome especially for those running older graphics cards. Its scummy making ppl have to sell a liver and a kidney to get the latest graphics card just to be able to take advantage of newer technology. This is great news for everyone. Happy future gaming everyone! =)
Man this is gonna help my old 2070 Super have more life in it. I'm a big DLSS 2 guy. But I'll immediately start using FSR 3, if it does what's promised without the need for a new graphics card.
@@mjers23wouldn't say top notch anymore. 2070 super would be considered mid-tier at best nowadays in 2023. People are upgrading their 3080's they got last year to the 4000 series. Now that is dumb lol
@@soraaoixxthebluesky The issue with Starfield only running on 30 fps is mostly due to a CPU calculation bottleneck not a graphics bottleneck. Mostly due to the "Creation Engines" feature to save information, location and all data of every object in the game world (or planets). But we will see.
That was the point of the Series to begin with, all of these features were made to be utilized simultaneously with the series consoles to achieve the performance xbox spoke about
@@immatoll4375it's not gonna matter, new generated frames aren't computed by the CPU as well. Although I'm pretty sure we will experience the same ghosting and blur as in DLSS3 case
Ive liked the results from fsr2 in the few implementations I've seen on Ps5 but this could seriously change the game. Particularly the viablity of ray traced & UE5 games
If this can take xbox series x/s (ps5?) games at their current highest quality settings (4k, 30fps, RT shadows) and push them to 60fps.. that would be a gigantic win for gamers.
That's great to see! While Nvidia is shanking gamers for cash, hopefully this can help them get closer to the DLSS 3 stuff. They just need to improve on RT now!
That ship has sailed already. Even Nvidia markets their main feature (RT) as completely unfeasible without DLSS. Most of their demos show games running at 10 or so FPS without any DLSS and RT ON. AI upscalers are sure to become a staple feature for games to run in the future
I'm really interested to see how, if at all, it interacts with DLSS and XeSS. On a RTX3000 series for example, you could upscale with DLSS 2 instead of FSR 2 and provide a better input for FSR 3 to interpolate.
Note that the "any-game" version (AMD Fluid Motion Frames) only works on AMD RDNA3 and up, and won't work nearly as well as FSR3 because it won't have access to per-pixel motion vectors. He skipped over all those details in this presentation. FSR 3 is AMD's equivalent to DLSS 3, while AFMF is AMD's equivalent to your TV's motion interpolation feature.
@@xCarbonManDenuvo games have been patched before in the PC game cracking scene, it won't take too long for the homebrew scene to find holes in denuvo, even if it's on a game by game basis.
“A ROTTEN HORSE HEAD ON THIS POOP NUGGET BROTENDO SWITCH 64 IN THE house now dead horses are in my brain and eyeballs looking into this fone skreen man” -Tom Brady
"you wanna know when its coming out?" "well I'll tell you" "well let me show you some gameplay footage" "ok that's the presentation thanks" sooo when is coming out then?
Something people forgot fsr 3.0 is available for only 2 games, and around 40-50 games in the future will get it as he said but the frame gen for ALL games is locked behind their amd graphics card
My question is, is AMD going to provide an FSR 3 SDK for Unity 2021 and 2022? It would be nice to see it supported there as well, especially considering the number of VR games supported on Unity Engine.
It's not launching with Starfield and it isn't listed in the "future games support" list . Also, Bethesda isn't labelled as a partner for FSR3. As per HardwareUnboxed's video. Huge blunder by AMD. Forspoken and Immortals of Aveum are terrible games to debut on. The former being a complete flop that was panned by most people and the latter is a unoptimized mess whilst also being a very average game.
@@Animatron11 AMD Anti-lag+ only works with AMD graphics cards. For nvidia graphics cards, there is an "nvidia reflex" that runs from a driver or game.
@@newsciencestuff5540 they didn’t say double or triple for the dx11 and dx12. The double or triple statement only pertained to the fsr3 supported titles. The dx11 and dx12 upscaling in adrenalines software probably won’t be as much but will still be cool.
So for fsr3 to work on all dx11/12 games, you need to have an AMD GPU to access the HYPR-RX software right? Guess I’ll be silently roasting marshmallows..
@@JeyC_It will be, there's a distinction, fsr3 game implemented is for everyone, but when he says "on all dx11/12 games" he's referring to fsr via driver, that's only for amd
This is a joke, but pretty soon AMD will not only be releasing new technology that works on old cards, but AMD drivers that work on discontinued Nvidia cards... LOL Wouldn't you like your 1080 Ti to last you another 6 years? AMD ReLive now works with all video cards. Go ahead, blow the dust off of that old 980 Ti and GTX 970. PC Thug Life!!! LOL
Yes AND this means that games will look better because if every dev can use this, that means they can simply go a lot further in their games. And still maintain a 30 or 60 fps.
FSR7: Hey guys, we've taken a game that runs at 10FPS and it now runs at 100FPS by generating 9 frames for every real frame! Sarcasm aside, I'm very concerned about BOTH NVidia and AMD misleading uninformed gamers about the benefits of frame generation. The LOWER the FPS you start from the worse the lag is. You can only help that with "anti-lag" solutions so much. The slower-paced the game is the lower the FPS you start from can be, but it's not a free lunch. There's always a trade-off. There's also going to be ARTIFACTS likely for a while and the more FAKE frames you have the more obvious they will be.
Sooo hoping for this to get added to starfield a few weeks after launch as well 🙏 Also this means a possible 60 fps patch for Starfield for console gamers 😎
Considering the AMD partnerships this would only make sense for BGS to integrate FSR 3 to boost frames to 60 FPS for sure for Series X. Not sure about Series S. If even the Series X could do 4K 60 for Starfield with FSR 3 that would be amazing.
@@swanky_yuropean7514 you're confusing FSR3 and HYPR-RX. the former works on all modern GPUs, but requires developers to implement it, the latter works only on AMD GPUs but requires not developer implementation, as per this very video.
THE 30 SERIES WONT GET FRAME GEN IN MOST GAMES BECAUSE DEVELOPERS WON'T IMPLEMENT IT. IT ONLY WORKS FOR AMD 7000 SERIES ON THE DRIVER LEVEL. YOU GUYS ARE F*CKED.
2025: AMD is ready to provide support to games like BGMI and many OpenGL & Vulkan APIs to support ultimate FPS at reduced latency in mobile and linux based devices!
Steam Deck is going to love this.
Move a joystick and enjoy smooth movement 3 seconds later 🤣
Not even a half second latency… well… that’s dlss 3
@@th3lasthop3You are clueless, DLSS 3 input lag only higher when you compare fps to fps..... But reality is DLSS 3 always have higher fps which compensates for Input lag hence you get less input lag than Native....
@@TRX25EX literal own a card that has it. Can not feel a difference.
It's not less, it's roughly the same if you activate Nvidia's Reflex
AMD really is pushing the envelope here. They could have gone the NVIDIA exclusivity route but instead opted to make EVERYONE's life better. Thank you, AMD!
Thank you
Not just that. Nvidia doesn't allow DLSS 3 to cards older than 40 series. So Nvidia is not allowing even their own consumers. Pathetic.
Well it's not hardware based like nVidia, AMD usually goes the open source route like freesync
Tbf, dlss requires special hardware that amd and Intel cards literally don't have
@@lopsidedwombatXeSS literally uses hardware similar to NVIDIA RTX cards, on Intel Arc.
AMD is taking Microsoft's approach. Instead of trying to compete head-on, they're making it possible to use their tech with any hardware.
Microsoftis directly compeating by buying studios .Microsoft has tech company money .Sony is the one that cant directly compeat becouse they just dont have the cash to do so . Second Microsoft makes money with game pass anything that has game pass is supportet makes them money .
Your delusional lol this been the vision consoles been using amd since back then
Its not since amd support old gpus from nvidia and nvidia doesnt benefit from old gpus like gtx 9xx and gtx 10xx
@@xythiera7255 OP was referencing Microsoft's approach to creating Windows
AMD is making its own approach as its always been more open sourced than NVIDIA.
FSR 3 will be great for devices like the Steam Deck and ROG Ally.
Switch 2 I hope :)
Won't work on Steam Deck unfortunately. RX5700 or higher.
@@roller12coasterwhy not? It's literally the same architecture.
@@ag8912 Because on AMD website it says GPU supported are RX5700 or higher.
@@roller12coaster They literally said that all GPUs can support it and by extension APUs
The engineering behind hardware agnostic yet performant tools like this is fantastic. DLSS might have a year or two lead in terms of visual fidelity, but FSR is more accessible. We need to support this kind of development over the "everything is proprietary" method.
That's idiotic. The whole point of hardware acceleration is software tailored to the hardware. You might as well demand everything be done in software if you think like that. Part of the reason why FSR is inferior is PRECISELY BECAUSE it isn't specifically made for special hardware.
@@Wobbothe3rdWhich games only run on particular graphics card brands? Or is software NOT always vendor-specific?
thats what he wrote lol@@Wobbothe3rd nvidia is limiting DLSS for them only.
@@LucidStrikelook up what an API is, and then get back to me.
@@Wobbothe3rdHardware acceleration isn't software written for the hardware, it's hardware developed for the software. "Software developed for the hardware" is how drivers work, aka how devs can be sure that their game will work on cards besides the one they developed the game on.
But the thing is, as long as the card API is Turing-complete, you can force it to do anything, and hardware will simply decide how well it performs. An open algorithm like FSR allows competitors to tune their hardware to perform better with it; DLSS does not.
Hopefully this helps all console games in the future.
it will
It will hopefully be integrated into current games as soon as it's released
Rather than pushing the graphics with the same amount of optimization I'm guessing the bar will lower and the technology won't improve much.
Playstation won't be getting it anytime soon
Will it come to PS5 as well?
The fact that it can run on any of the older cards and not just AMD is a big win for pc and console gamers. Thumbs up to that alright.
That's not even true LOL.
whats not true?
@@Stardomplay
It will be some of the older generation cards not all of them 💀
@@Stardomplay It is true, just not with FSR 2.0, which nobody mentioned. This is for FSR 3.0
@@disl0cate138 How come?
Can't wait till Digital Foundry breaks this all down!
Digital Foundry already got to see it behind the stage working on full demos and they are very impressed. Image quality wise, it's comparable to DLSS 3. Richard even wrote an article about it.
@@kishaloyb.7937 it was always going to be on par with DLSS 3... why do you think it went from beginning of the year to end of the year, AMD had to make sure it was ready.
@@kishaloyb.7937 this is dope!
That was my thought!
@@kishaloyb.7937can you link the article please?
If only the half is true FSR3 will be the hammer.
You amd clowns will never cease to amaze me
@@dougr8646 did you not watch the video
@@ikitclaw8969not sure but maybe op forgot to put "Even" at the start of the sentence so... "Even if", or it's because it's not launching now but early next year so we won't exactly have it till then.
Half of it being true might be close.
If its true, amd gonna become THE hero that dethroned Intel and ended gpu crisis by both selling cheaper options and releasing fsr 3 meaning that many people wont even need to upgrade for much longer
This could be game changing especially for Xbox, 60 fps Raytracing might happen. At the very least the 60 fps promise that was for this console generation.
in 1080 maybe, but it also gonna look horrific
@@HD-fc4dsNo at 4K my friend.
@@HD-fc4dsdepends on the display
@@HD-fc4dsSeries S, 1080 sure. Series X is 12tflops and should be able to handle 4k 60 easy.
There are disadvantages, like input lag so you can use it with every game unfortunately
This is actually incredible. Kudos to AMD. Truly groundbreaking stuff.
Wait and see if it is actually usable before shilling.
@@n.a.1625 leaked demos are very impressive.
@@n.a.1625Shilling is when you are excited for a product from a company that's not acting cartoonishly evil and anti-consumer. Smartest nvidioid
stf u@@n.a.1625
What I'm worried about now is that all game developers will start creating games that will force you to use FSR and playing games natively will be a thing of the past unless you have a flagship GPU, really hope that won't happen
How is the audience not more excited?! This is the real deal!
Half of them probz not hard-core gamers
half of them bought 5k$$ graphic cards to see their old potato card have 150 fps on 4k in nextgen games, they're crushed
Half of them think it's a fraud
Half the crowd probably nvidia snobs.
Huge AMD W! We need companies doing stuff like this to help push nextgen forward
Actually that's because they put priority on their oldgen GPU that shows how much they care about their customers
FSR 3 is going to hugely benefit iGPUs in the future. With strix point Halo coming out next year, FSR 3 will truly make gaming possible on a thin and portable laptop.
upcoming steam deck 2, asus rog ally 2, lenovo legion go 2
the minimal supported GPU is RX 5700. No way it will work for iGPUs, at least the current ones.
@@Someniatkoamd new apus are using RDNA 2/3
will fsr3 work on iris xe?
@@internetuser0496The man said it would work on AMD, Nvidia and Intel graphics cards, so yeah probably
Been with Nvidia for over 12 years now. Next card I'm switching out to AMD, even if the updates come a ways down the line. This is top notch consumer care!
same
Same here
+1
This isn't consumer care lol. This is the only logical decision for a company that cannot produce the hardware to compete on the market. You people don't understand how business competition works and it shows.
@@camil-jr but they still doing something for who doesn´t have top tech, or im wrong ?
This is really awesome especially for those running older graphics cards. Its scummy making ppl have to sell a liver and a kidney to get the latest graphics card just to be able to take advantage of newer technology. This is great news for everyone. Happy future gaming everyone! =)
older cards.....at nvidia, even 3090 is considered old
Yeah... Asking more money for better performing stuff is real scummy... What?!?
@@swolloch Yes... Sad.... 😑
@@swolloch isnt the 3090 released like a year ago..i think? wtf is wrong with nvidia pushing their tech so soon
@@uzumaki6759 It was released 3 years ago not one.
Thank you AMD, thanks to the engineers, thanks Radeon.
That would be nice for the rog ally and steam deck can't wait to try it
3:00
Just a few more weeks ahead
Still waiting
Man this is gonna help my old 2070 Super have more life in it. I'm a big DLSS 2 guy. But I'll immediately start using FSR 3, if it does what's promised without the need for a new graphics card.
hahaah 2070 super still top notch card wtf...
@@mjers23not at any resolution higher than 1080p
@@mjers23wouldn't say top notch anymore. 2070 super would be considered mid-tier at best nowadays in 2023.
People are upgrading their 3080's they got last year to the 4000 series. Now that is dumb lol
Consider getting an AMD Radeon card next so FSR3 is game agnostic too!
2070 super is not old that is 2019 only 3 years
Hell yeah AMD! Thank you for being so consumer friendly! ❤
AMD and those engineers will have my full support, no more Nvidia. Moving away from 1070 to 7800xt.
👍
Don`t botteneck it please! lol
I’m interested to see how it would affect the Series S
For a single player games, getting a 60 fps through FSR3.0 on games like Starfield is a Godsends .
Hopefully it will work on all current gen consoles.
@@soraaoixxthebluesky The issue with Starfield only running on 30 fps is mostly due to a CPU calculation bottleneck not a graphics bottleneck. Mostly due to the "Creation Engines" feature to save information, location and all data of every object in the game world (or planets). But we will see.
That was the point of the Series to begin with, all of these features were made to be utilized simultaneously with the series consoles to achieve the performance xbox spoke about
@@soraaoixxtheblueskyIf most of what they're saying is true, series s vue boutta be crazyyy
@@immatoll4375it's not gonna matter, new generated frames aren't computed by the CPU as well. Although I'm pretty sure we will experience the same ghosting and blur as in DLSS3 case
Ive liked the results from fsr2 in the few implementations I've seen on Ps5 but this could seriously change the game. Particularly the viablity of ray traced & UE5 games
Great announcement.... I'd like to see more for sure!!! Awesome to see XBOX compatibility too!!
Both consoles run amd hardware
@@xythiera7255what?
@@StardomplayThey said BOTH of the consoles run AMD hardware. Referring to Xbox and Playstation being the both here.
@@EXRDaBeasta what?
@@badpuppy3it was pretty clear english bud
If this can take xbox series x/s (ps5?) games at their current highest quality settings (4k, 30fps, RT shadows) and push them to 60fps.. that would be a gigantic win for gamers.
That's great to see! While Nvidia is shanking gamers for cash, hopefully this can help them get closer to the DLSS 3 stuff.
They just need to improve on RT now!
lately Nvidia is a joke its totally anti-consumer
RT will become obsolete with Path Tracing in unreal 5.2 and Beyond.
I’d love games to be better optimised and not require an upscaler to be playable. You know like they did 4 or so years ago.
Graphics get better and you mad because they get harder to run, but there's also a solution, but that also make you mad 😂
That ship has sailed already. Even Nvidia markets their main feature (RT) as completely unfeasible without DLSS. Most of their demos show games running at 10 or so FPS without any DLSS and RT ON. AI upscalers are sure to become a staple feature for games to run in the future
Graphics settings that aren’t an afterthought would be really great.
I'm really interested to see how, if at all, it interacts with DLSS and XeSS. On a RTX3000 series for example, you could upscale with DLSS 2 instead of FSR 2 and provide a better input for FSR 3 to interpolate.
rezaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
FSR 3 is going to be a game changer for Steam Deck especially Cyberpunk 2077!
No
Yes
Maybe
The three choices: 1) No || 2) Yes || 3) Maybe
Thank you AMD
As soon as this gets released into Unreal Engine, I'm 100% adding this to my game! thx amd
what game ?
@@barbuceanu2005 the one you just lost
That's why we love AMD !
We do?
@@AriesWarlockcompared to nvidia? yes
Ngreedia
@@jidernah. They skimp out on hardware and software. Still great cards, but nvidia is just better.
@@cirescytheAMD price to performance is unmatched
ok SO Cyberpunk Phantom of Liberty is out now, where is FSR 3.0 ?
only in forspoken and immortals of avium at the moment
Fantastic technology. Great job on bringing Fluid Motion Frames to all DX11/12 games!
"you wanna see FSR3?"
*Audience going wild*
"Let me show you on Forespoken"
*Absolute silence*
It’s been six months and like 10 games support it and half of those games aren’t worth playing ☠️
40 series got all the sales even the super ones they are not even caught up
Can’t wait to have this in Microsoft Flight Simulator
where is fsr 3
@@justanothercommenter6763 me too , but there is no news about it
FSR 3 comes out Q1 2024.
@@Darkinse thanks
Guy in video say is few more weeks but in reality is one month later haha
@@shalltearbloodfallen8712 it was a lie
Where FSR 3 in starfield? Haha
Bro you are a loser, FSR already out on Forspoken lmao
Note that the "any-game" version (AMD Fluid Motion Frames) only works on AMD RDNA3 and up, and won't work nearly as well as FSR3 because it won't have access to per-pixel motion vectors. He skipped over all those details in this presentation. FSR 3 is AMD's equivalent to DLSS 3, while AFMF is AMD's equivalent to your TV's motion interpolation feature.
pc emulators are popping with amds last gen fsr
with 3 sounds like its going to be amazing
unfortunately Nintendo games will have an Anti-simulator DRM powered by denuvo in their upcoming releases
@@xCarbonManDenuvo games have been patched before in the PC game cracking scene, it won't take too long for the homebrew scene to find holes in denuvo, even if it's on a game by game basis.
FSR 3 for console seems huge if it's decent
“A ROTTEN HORSE HEAD ON THIS POOP NUGGET BROTENDO SWITCH 64 IN THE house now dead horses are in my brain and eyeballs looking into this fone skreen man” -Tom Brady
"you wanna know when its coming out?"
"well I'll tell you"
"well let me show you some gameplay footage"
"ok that's the presentation thanks"
sooo when is coming out then?
He said early fall.. Meaning September or October. If it doesn't get released this year, then AMD shot itself at the foot
No offense, but I've never heard a more lackluster audience, especially when a guy has just claimed to help people triple their framerate.
It is literally dark magic, that should not be supposed to work, but somehow it does 😂
Who says that it shoudnt ?
Nvidia has litterly insentive to tell peopl that to keep 40xx sales up
nvidia: you must buy 4000 series gpu to get it
amd: free to everyone on any hardware
Can't wait to try this out on my Steam Deck!
XD Video. That's incredible fake
I'm more interested in the "Super Resolution" part and how it improves upon fsr 2.0's image quality.
It sadly does not.
@@Stardomplayhow do you know?? You already tested it?
RSR is worse than FSR...
Something people forgot fsr 3.0 is available for only 2 games, and around 40-50 games in the future will get it as he said but the frame gen for ALL games is locked behind their amd graphics card
It will work with nvidia but the anti lag is locked to amd cards. Hopefully reflex will work with it or the latency will be crazy.
Ohhh this explains why Bethesda is partnering with AMD for Starfield 🤯🤯
Started to love amd so fking much, next graphics card will be amd
The better frame generation gets does that means developers put less time into optimizing games
Amen to that! Features like this shouldn't EVER be restricted to a specific model, that's why you're the best for consumers AMD! ❤
Features being restricted to a specific model is done for literally everything.
I'm gonna sell my RTX 3060Ti and buy an AMD, these guys deserve my money and my love!
Hope they got the anti lag down or it wont matter
Anti lag exists already
My question is, is AMD going to provide an FSR 3 SDK for Unity 2021 and 2022? It would be nice to see it supported there as well, especially considering the number of VR games supported on Unity Engine.
Legend says the FSR 3 guy hasn't stopped yet
Didn't show gameplay, something smells fishy here.
If this comes to starfield I’d be super stoked
It's not launching with Starfield and it isn't listed in the "future games support" list . Also, Bethesda isn't labelled as a partner for FSR3. As per HardwareUnboxed's video.
Huge blunder by AMD. Forspoken and Immortals of Aveum are terrible games to debut on. The former being a complete flop that was panned by most people and the latter is a unoptimized mess whilst also being a very average game.
@@chaz__ But unless people can't wait another 4 months for it to become game-agnostic, does it matter?
@@Outmind01it will not launch though
@@Outmind01 What do you mean by game agnostic? What are you referring to?
Even if Starfield isn't launching with support it's going to happen, hopefully sooner rather than later.
Would love to know the input lag with this…must be horrible no?
Probably like with DLSS 3 - worse than without generated frames but not actually horrible.
So apparently. You need about 60 fps for the frame generation to work. If that is true then that is a huge disappointment
It would be a dream to combine FSR 3 for frame generation and DLSS 2 for better image quality.
and nvidia reflex))
Yeah, it's called DLSS 3.0, lol...
@@Prisoner_ksc2-303 which only works for 4000 series unlike fsr 3, lol...
@@AranonDon't need it, we got AMD Anti-lag+
@@Animatron11 AMD Anti-lag+ only works with AMD graphics cards. For nvidia graphics cards, there is an "nvidia reflex" that runs from a driver or game.
All these talk but all the AMD chips in Xbox adn Starfield only runs at 30 fps 😂
Barely bought RX6750 XT today. Installing tomorrow. I'm Really looking forward to trying FSR3. Great work AMD!!
My rx 6700 xt is arriving soon. This really is amazing news!
And....
AMD is back in the game, bro really took his time but came back with max stats to beat up nvidia.
Disclaimer : Nvidia wasn’t hurt during this announcement
Of course they aren’t, they’ve got you to be hurt for them.
lmao @@Sho_Ishto
@@Sho_Ishtoliterally every dx11 game.... Double to tripling framerates. Let's just hope this is true
@@newsciencestuff5540 they didn’t say double or triple for the dx11 and dx12. The double or triple statement only pertained to the fsr3 supported titles. The dx11 and dx12 upscaling in adrenalines software probably won’t be as much but will still be cool.
@@joshuahogan2554 yes he did check at 4:39
The ground he's standing on has Ray Tracing effect 4:08
FSR3 already?😅😮
So for fsr3 to work on all dx11/12 games, you need to have an AMD GPU to access the HYPR-RX software right? Guess I’ll be silently roasting marshmallows..
Pretty sure he said this won't be an AMD exclusive thing
@@JeyC_ ahem, for it to work on ALL games, you need to be able to access the driver software... which requires an amd gpu
@@JeyC_It will be, there's a distinction, fsr3 game implemented is for everyone, but when he says "on all dx11/12 games" he's referring to fsr via driver, that's only for amd
FSR 3 with Hypr-RX!!! Incredible!!!!!
This is a joke, but pretty soon AMD will not only be releasing new technology that works on old cards, but AMD drivers that work on discontinued Nvidia cards... LOL Wouldn't you like your 1080 Ti to last you another 6 years? AMD ReLive now works with all video cards. Go ahead, blow the dust off of that old 980 Ti and GTX 970. PC Thug Life!!! LOL
Dude this is so sick for consoles!! 🌌💟
Yes AND this means that games will look better because if every dev can use this, that means they can simply go a lot further in their games. And still maintain a 30 or 60 fps.
@@jameswayton2340 aw hell naw for 30fps
This technology should bring us at least 60fps for all games
FSR7:
Hey guys, we've taken a game that runs at 10FPS and it now runs at 100FPS by generating 9 frames for every real frame!
Sarcasm aside, I'm very concerned about BOTH NVidia and AMD misleading uninformed gamers about the benefits of frame generation. The LOWER the FPS you start from the worse the lag is. You can only help that with "anti-lag" solutions so much. The slower-paced the game is the lower the FPS you start from can be, but it's not a free lunch. There's always a trade-off. There's also going to be ARTIFACTS likely for a while and the more FAKE frames you have the more obvious they will be.
FINALLY. SOMEBODY THAT GETS IT!!!
Was really hoping to hear the big surprise was that it would be launching day 1 with starfield. Either way. Excellent news for almost all gamers.
Same. With no DLSS that game is gonna be struggling on my PC lol
Alas would probably only be useful on a PC that can run starfield at 60 to start
@@punani_slayer4209it has fsr2 though
September 6th is day 1... Unless you got the premium edition.
that might actually mean stable 60+ fps on xbox seriesx finally
here is your Xbox mid refresh
Waiting for FSR 3 on Phantom Liberty with a GTX1650
And yet Summer 24 we become AFMF 2, have FSR3.1 and AntiLag 2 from AMD. :)
Sooo hoping for this to get added to starfield a few weeks after launch as well 🙏
Also this means a possible 60 fps patch for Starfield for console gamers 😎
Let’s hope so 🤞🏼
Didn't the starfield devs confirm they will not be using AMD's FSR technology..
@@DanielPerez-hy6qino they did not say that
@@DanielPerez-hy6qi
Devs specifically partnered with AMD to deny the use of DLSS in Starfield.
Considering the AMD partnerships this would only make sense for BGS to integrate FSR 3 to boost frames to 60 FPS for sure for Series X. Not sure about Series S. If even the Series X could do 4K 60 for Starfield with FSR 3 that would be amazing.
Love what AMD is doing. Nvidia is crap.
Amd cares about all gamers.
Also amd: excludes dlss on all amd sponsored games.
You can use FSR 2 on any Nvidia card in amd sponsored games. Not big deal.
@@Allikkill I'd rather not have my game look like a wet sponge, so it is a big deal.
Nvidia would never ever do this. AMD wants to contribute to advancement and that deserves praise!
direct 11 and 12 ? Wow take that nvidia, that what you get for over pricing your cards you still haven't broke even on.
More like double or triple your input latency. That's what these technologies do.
These only really work on single player games anyway.
Xbox desperately needs FSR 3.0 frame generation.
All do it will benefit all.
The hyper-rx stuff at the end is exclusively AMD. As amd adrenaline software doesnt work with Nvidia graphics drivers.
amd yes
Final fantasy XVI 4k 60 on Playstation 5 confirmed?!
Thanks for bringing frame gen to 30 series!
That wont work. Frame gen is tied to AMD Software. I'm pretty sure you cant run the AMD Adrenalin software without an AMD GPU.
@@swanky_yuropean7514it will work like fsr2 does. Rtx gpus are supported in this new fsr3 frame generation as per official amd site.
@@swanky_yuropean7514 They literally said "any gpu"
@@swanky_yuropean7514 you're confusing FSR3 and HYPR-RX. the former works on all modern GPUs, but requires developers to implement it, the latter works only on AMD GPUs but requires not developer implementation, as per this very video.
THE 30 SERIES WONT GET FRAME GEN IN MOST GAMES BECAUSE DEVELOPERS WON'T IMPLEMENT IT. IT ONLY WORKS FOR AMD 7000 SERIES ON THE DRIVER LEVEL. YOU GUYS ARE F*CKED.
Its probably time to switch back to amd gpus
This is incredible even for Switch who recently tested fsr 2.0 and found it very helpful with frame rates
They made basically all dlss cards - fsr cards haha. And them gtx 1070 and 1080 will not die 3 to 5 years more hahahaha
Thanks amd for giving my rtx 3060 a new life🗿
No actual information, and an extremely short demonstration of the technology supposedly working.
Aside from FSR 1; are 2 an 3 compatible with the Nintendo Switch on any level of effectiveness?
Yeap, No Man's Sky uses FSR 2 on Switch.
FSR 2 is supported on Switch. Don't know about FSR 3.
There might be a hardware limitations on this. Some techniques like frame generations might need extra CUs or shaders units to process
FSR 1 and 2 work on anything even on Smartphone (no pun intended) it depends on the devs to implement it or not.
As others have said FSR2 is compatible with switch, but it isn't cheap on the little handheld.
well AMD just freaking obliterated Nvidia in 6 min 🙂 , Nvidia is like WTF! 😱
A game changer for the industry at all levels if they deliver, and a democratization of the access to the tech, kudos, guys! I'll be following this.
2025: AMD is ready to provide support to games like BGMI and many OpenGL & Vulkan APIs to support ultimate FPS at reduced latency in mobile and linux based devices!
This sounds great, will be able to rock my 580 for even longer now
People should really support AMD more. they are delivering awesome products and still lose sales every month