Yeah and she was willing to have her mind change when she was proven wrong factually. Real life conspiracists would resort to denial and verbal attacks even if you prove them undoubtably wrong.
@@jojoaja6106 because that is American's thing (duh), and does not affect the Cold War, people was smart back then, there isn't such thing as flatearthers until, 21st century which somehow people's intelligence were worse than before?
Actually this is not true. Russia has plenty of conspiracy theorists and some have even claimed the moon landings are a hoax. Dmitry Rogozin, the head of Russia's troubled space agency Roscosmos, even joked about sending a probe to the moon to check.
@@TexMex421 Actually every country has it's conspiracy theorists. Even in my country, India. It's not about those idiots, it's about the space agencies and governments.
I had a coworker who insisted that the moon landing was faked using alien technology from a crashed alien vessel. When asked why they didn't go to the moon using the alien technology, he got grumpy and said "that's not how it worked!!"
It warms my heart that the Russian cosmonauts in their space station were actually cheering and saluting with vodka as they watched the American landing, and that NASA left a plaque on the Moon in memory of 14 fallen US astronauts _and_ USSR cosmonauts.
@@BananawithJaundice The pyramids being made by slaves thing is a myth, the people who built it where contracted and paid for their labor. They even got buried near the pyramids that they worked on, I believe with valuable goods to ensure that their work wasn't without gratitude.
@@Alex.Johnsenit's told that way in basic education and old books about Egypt. And old books I mean before 2000. Education books are often 20 years behind where science is today.
@@tsioulak the owner of a laundromat in which Joey was trying to get his picture hung up refused to add him to the wall for his show due to the very reasons you expresed in your previous comment
fruitea m The Russians picked up the radio signals FROM THE SKY so they know it was real. And no, we didn’t have the technology then to make reliable robots that could carry recordings of the fake video and execute all the maneuvers to be in the same place as the fake astronauts would be (two critical rocket burns, to park in lunar orbit and to come home, HAD to be done on the far side of the Moon out of contact with Earth), much less detect when something went wrong and INSTANTLY switch to a different video (and audio) recording of the SPECIFIC type of fake disaster as appropriate. And if there had been ONE mistake detected by the Russians or anyone else (like the Australian team who had to step in for the tracking station that was supposed to pick up the landing and first steps at the last minute; find the movie “The Dish”), the reputation of the US in the world would have been worse than it will be by 2020 with Trump. TRYING AND FAILING would be less damaging than being caught FAKING. And EVEN IF the technology to fake it reliably enough not to get caught HAD been available at ANY price in 1969 (which it wasn’t), it would have cost MORE than the actual Apollo project did.
Joe Swanson Just saying there was no PRACTICAL way to fool anyone with the ability to compare the live TV feed with radio signals containing the same information with what they picked up by pointing an ANTENNA AT THE MOON. I went into some detail about the reasons for this, but if all you know about the Apollo project (and the Mercury and Gemini projects which preceded it) is that “NASA fed the world some TV broadcasts claiming we went to the Moon,” and if you don’t know anything about antennas and receivers, especially the Doppler effect, you may need to read up a bit on physics. So what part do you consider to be “nonsense?” Details, please.
Reiian Plaier I mean that putting a fake space mission on the air from transmitters ACTUALLY mounted on SPACECRAFT, following the SAME paths through space as the faked astronauts would be following, would be the only way to convince observers capable of actually POINTING ANTENNAS at the sky, and it would be, EVEN TODAY, more expensive and more likely to be caught faking than actually sending astronauts up in spacecraft.
It ties in with the Emily Ruins Adam episode where she says some people don't want to change their minds and will hold onto their beliefs even moreso when someone challenges them.
There is no reason for the USA to fake the moon landings instead of trying to actually get to the moon. The earliest forms of guided missiles and munitions were already made by Nazi Germany (V1 and V2 rockets, Fritz X guided bombs), and computers were already in use during WW2 on US battleships and Bletchley Park in the UK. The scientists who worked on the guided missiles were also the same scientists who were hired by the USA to join NASA. So the USA already had the technologies and Human Resources to work on getting to the moon especially after 20 years of tech advancements.
A detail they forgot to mention was that the dust in the footage reacts how dust in a vacuum would. It's flat with no poofing. In fact, the only way to have dust react flat like it did, is to have the entire set in a vacuum. A vacuum so large, that it would still be the largest vacuum ever made by a long shot.
Hi Omil, you mentioned that dust kicked up on the lunar surface will behave differently compared to an equilivent situation on Earth. A perfect example of this is the "Rooster Tail" dust trails kicked up by Apollo 16's John Young during his "Grand Prix" in April 1972. This very situation has been analysed, studied and the published results are easily obtained online. "Ballistic motion of dust in the Lunar Roving Vehicle dust trails", Hsu, Hsiang-Wen, Horányi, Mihály, (University of Colorado), American Journal of Physics, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp. 452-456 (2012). They conclude that the lack of particles’ deceleration along the x-axis of their coordinate system, could only be the case if Apollo 16’s rover footage was filmed in a vacuum and in an environment where the acceleration due to gravity = 1.6 m/s2. . Enjoy reading, take care.
It's sad because a person who thought the moon landing was fake wouldn't accept the reality like this lady. They would disagree on ANYTHING the smart person said
Adam, this is an argument you are never gonna win and with a quote from Bill Murray, “It is hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it is damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person.”
I agree I would enjoy that one as well. However I doubt they will since Neil deGrasse Tyson and many others have already taken it upon themselves to do that.
The problem with debunking conspiracy theories is they can just claim its the conspiracy. You could take the worlds leading authority on the subject and they can just say they are part of the cover up. Its an argument style best suited for the lazy and unintelligent.
How is it lazy and unintelligent? Especially when you are admitting you blindly follow authority. Critical thinking is good when it’s about stuff I don’t like, but when it’s about stuff I like it’s lazy and stupid right? Funny in your arrogance and condescension you expose yourself as a midwit that will just blindly believe whatever someone in a labcoat tells you
@@JA-jx1hk The point I made was that conspiracy theorists, even in the face of evidence will still just claim conspiracy and ignore the evidence. Thats what makes it lazy and most suited for the unintelligent because it requires little to no critical thinking. Yes we all have to blindly follow authorities all the time. If someone doesnt know how to fix their car they have to trust a mechanic, if people are sick they go to a doctor. They didnt watch the doctor graduate or monitor their entire educational pathway but they dont really have much choice. Now tell me more about how im a midwit.
@@DonnieDGaming by saying when “confronted with evidence” you further expose yourself as a midwit. What is evidence? Who affirms this evidence? Is a massive international institution signing off on a study as peer reviewed the only form of evidence? There was zero evidence presented in this video to debunk it and yet you still made your wild blanket statement that conspiracy theorists are lazy when in fact often times they research this stuff much more than the average TH-cam midwit making fun of them, they are literally obsessed with this stuff to a fault but you want to call them lazy and unintelligent simply because they aren’t satisfied with an authority figures answer. Also, you can learn to fix your own car, you can have someone teach you, you can do research on how a car works to where you have a better understanding of it in order to avoid being conned by a dishonest mechanic… Just by using that as an example you show how much of a midwit you are and ironically how intellectually lazy you yourself are. Just admit that “evidence” to you is merely a high production infantilized TH-cam video with some man child narrating it and a stamp from an organization you recognize and you’ll gladly just blindly accept it and call it a day lmao
here the problem with faking the moon landing. the Soviet Union would have know if we had faked the moon landing because a spy would have informed the USSR that we faked the landing, and then the Soviet's would have proceed to land on the moon and put the flag of the USSR up.
Warning:If you hate me well dont look at this. Hello. My life on roblox is all about fun. Im here for my bestfriend.Tiana Shes a diamond. Her name suits her cause shes a princess Shes my life No one can seperate us. Yes we do fight. But it only means we are true bestfriends. I dont care how much you try to seperate us and steal her from me. Beacause ill always protect her. Shes not in the top t e n. Shes in the top o ne :). Shes such a good roleplayer. She understands me. She protects me. She cares about me like I do. Were twins even doe were not the same Thats what we would say. You can do what you want whit your little seperating plans. But it will never work whit me and Tia. I ♥ you Tia :)
+Johnny But if she's in the top one, then she's also in the top ten, because it goes one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, and one is before ten.
ya, the comments here are testament to the intelligence level of fans of this channel. Especially all the "Kubrick perfectionist"comments. So witty and original.
Also, try dropping a hammer and a feather at the same height and moment on earth. The hammer always hits first because the atmosphere slows the feathers descent. Do it on the moon ( no atmosphere) and they always land at the same time. This experiment was performed on live tv on Apollo 15.
@Ameri CAN we do space walks on stations orbiting earth, which suffer from light warping thanks to gravity Plus, a stadium light would still suffer the same shadow issues, did you not watch this video?
@Henrique Ourives Faked on the moon would be perfectly dumb by the way. You would already arrive there and potentially tease the other team, in this case, the Soviet Union. Plus, it would be a waste of money. Anyways, nice joke. r/whooosh Bet this will happen one day and one person will do it.
@idkwhatimdoing yee (Moron detected who cannot read what I said and wants to cause a stupid argument). Edit: And I also said that his joke is (actually it is a "was" now) good. And plus, look at my reply too that was given months ago, no editing since. Good job, sir.
One point that was entirely left out is that even if it was possible to fake it, they sill had to built gigantic, first of its kind rocket that has mathematically provably got the ability to get to the moon
My favorite conspiracy theory is that Kubrick was hired to direct a phoney moon landing, but his perfectionist attitude made him film it on location on the moon
Yea and re write it everithing from scratch. The original script said "holy shit its freaking laika", instead of "is a small step for a men but a big step...
fun film fact before he was fired colin trevorrow expressed interest in getting shots for star wars episode 9 in space the idea was he wanted to hire space x to shuttle a modified imax camera into orbit and basically get some shots of the big black it would have made history but also be astronomically expensive and disney shot him down and a year later he was fired
At this point, this show isn't "Adam Ruins Everything", but more like "Adam shows facts that every single person with a functioning brain should know".
@@jonsmith3945 what's this "if you're older, you'll understand" crap lmfao. I ain't intelligent enough to disprove what you're saying so I'll just make up some excuse and say that you are just a mere child and I know everything lmao.
@@overlordjay9807 Because this is a channel for juveniles and not a good source of scientific info. Therefore defenders of Adam strike me as young. No, I don't know everything. I just know this channel is mostly bullshit.
Forgot to mention perhaps one of the best arguments against faking it. They would still have to launch all the giant rockets that millions of civilians witnessed and countries tracked over the sky. Just building and launching those rockets are perhaps the most expensive part of the project, may as well just use them to go there.
Ola Ruud Then they would have to fake the process of getting the astronauts out of the shuttle. To fake the moon landing would have been harder and more expensive than to just send people there and back to prove it. We went, we were there.
Yeah. But then again there are people that think the earth is flat and some imaginary friend that made the universe, was somehow distracted during ww2 but cares if they masturbate.
Ola Ruud You've seen the Mitchell and Webb sketch, right? "Well, we'd have to build and launch a MASSIVE rocket of course." "Why? We're not ACTUALLY sending anyone to the Moon, are we?" "Well we'll need to build and launch the massive rocket so that if anyone asks "Well how did you GET to the Moon?" we'll be able to say "Well we went in that MASSIVE rocket you saw!"
I mean, it's been proven time and time again that random people on 4chan can do what entire law enforcement and government agencies can't, so that's not a very good argument
Chycreus Remember the Berkeley free speech bike lock incident? They were able to find the guy who did. Remember the “he will not divide us” thing? Yeah they figured that shit out quick
Of all the old conspiracies, this one hits home the most with me. My dad, an aerospace engineer on the Gemini and Apollo projects said it best, like the reserved, serious and massively competent and capable man he is when upon Apollo 11's touchdown ...." YES ! "
Will Jacobs there's no economic benefit to going to the moon, that's why other countries haven't tried. The only reason the space race happened is because it was a dick measuring contest, not because there's gold to mine in the moon.
The benefit to going to the moon was to collect data and scientific research that you really can't can't get from looking at a telescope. And honestly, how is this not an economic benefit? If you have scientific information, you have the whole scientific community flocking to you for that same information. Therefore we have created an industry of science, technology, engineering, and math. Going to the moon wasn't just about the SPACE race, but it was also about the HUMAN race. It was about seeing our limitations. And also we don't only send people out to orbit, we also send space craft out further beyond the moon to take images and make scientific discoveries. Today, the Voyager 1 is the furthest traveling man made object, going beyond the solar system and it still sends scientific data to us each day. Sure there's no man on the craft, but to put a man on a space craft for 40 years and send him beyond the solar system to this day is still impossible. And sending people to the international space station also returns to us a lot of scientific research. It's a lab in space where we do things that we can't do on Earth. Nothing like this would even be possible without having started with at least the moon. Today going to the moon is impractical because we've already seen it all. There's no point anymore, we made it there and now we can focus on other things, like new planets across the universe in a different galaxy.
Musical Pop-tart by economic benefit, I'm mostly talking about quick money. Corporations and governments getting quick money. I don't think you can get that from the moon without sinking tons of dollars. I'm kind of pessimistic. While I do believe we would've gotten to the moon at some point, I believe that the cold war's rivalry was the main drive, despite what jfk or the US government say about it being human discovery as the main drive. I mean, all I have to do is look at the difference between NASA's budget back then and now. The difference is big, safe to say, without a rivalry. And that's why I think most countries haven't put in a real effort to go to mars or other planets. And honestly, I'm not complaining. Sinking lots of gov't money right now on space won't really go over well with the population of any country. Space is cool, and you can't really argue against the virtue of science, but you and I both know the majority have more concerns. Whereas in the cold war, the main concern was Russia and that's why sinking lots of money in it was acceptable.
Not sure what your trying to say, US invading iraq for israel is considered a wild illogical theory. Can you prove that wrong please? Or go back to sucking upto people because you cant argue yourself.
They should make one on the existence of god to those who thinks wrongly like that girl maybe To athiests: i want you to take 4 minutes from your time and read this if you're a fair and a just person looking for truth as you claim. 1) i wanna tell you just one small little 2 comparative examples (ps: The few humble examples that I will mention do not mean that they are most of them. Indeed, examples are literally unfinished, but as I said, it is only the way your mind thinks) to show you that it's not a matter of knowledge and IQ to know there is a god. It does need a proper mind in the first place so you can use this knowledge to know that . i want you to tell me the percentage of coincidence that your messages you sent to me were formed in which you used 26 letters to form them by randomly clicking while you closing your eyes . ? I want you to tell me the chances of that phone you hold now to be made if i just throw a bomb in the air at some materials? And then gather all of your informations about biology for exemple and tell me the chances of DNA who formed from nitrogenous bases, phosphoric acid, and others. Being created . And the chances of how this DNA tape that consist from 4 letters (A.T.C.G) can make several kinds of billions of proteins that each one of them have a specific job like (Hormonal proteins Enzymatic proteins. Structural proteins .Defensive proteins .Storage proteins. Carrier proteins. Receptor proteins. Systolic proteins) And tell me the chances of making constitute effective organs, each one has an important role in human life in order to exercise its anomalies (The lymphatic system . The digestive system The respiratory system . The nervous system . The circulatory system . Endocrine system . The immune system . The lymphatic system . The muscular system . The urinary system . Skeletal system . The reproductive system ) And give me the percentage that multiple departments would be formed that would effectively perform their role for each of these devices . And then the same way tell the percentage of this world with it's functions starting from the atoms. To the lands . Mountains. Load currents. And the creation of new lands and others disappear. and layers of the earth and layers of the sky preserving it. And a coincidence that forms water molecules. Then these are like the fuel that spreads life on the earth. Then think about what you know about the universe . Like think of yourself opening your pc which is made with a very intelligence way ( the hardware and software) then you open an AR game for exemple and start creating your avatar. ( doing the hair and the size of eye and ... ) you can't say that this pc or this avatar you made came by chance. Like some bomb exploded and did all of that. You believe that those stuff have a creator. So why you don't believe that the (Mosquito) for exemple have a creator . Infact if those avatars you created had some algorithm like humans minds . Most of them would believe that there is bomb made them and their world not a ( creator) Look at these pictures in you head (imagine) and give me the percentage of making one by coincidence let's say after millions of years : a beginner paint of a cat with pen . Then imagine a professional paint of a cat that looks real. Then i want you to imagine a model of a cat. If you say the chance of making this by coincidence is 0 so how could this cat in real life be made by a coincidence. by an explosion after millions of years. I never heard about creating a meaningful paragraph by clicking randomly on the keyboard. Or create a library by throwing a bomb in a forest. If i told you that this could happened you wouldn't believe . You keep talking about how the humanbody can't be made by god because of some claims that science already have answered on years ago like blind spot in the eyes (which is something important to the human eye) and the tail in some baby boomers (which is nothing but appendages that appear anywhere in a person and do not carry any vertebrae, bones, or spinal cord. Only appendages) and the rest of the spread of this false and naive assumption by Darwin and those who imitated him in his idea of (archaeological or atrophic remnants) of the development in the human body such as the appendix, the ear protuberance and the endocrine glands !! (The errors of which modern science has revealed are all wrong,) but you never believe that a car or any invention made by coincidence because it has some Design errors for example. Not to mention that humans never invented something more advanced, sophisticated and audited than humans themselves. actually there is no invention more superior than a fly. They are still trying to simulate the brain of a pigeon in the manufacture of aircraft, and they could not . And yet you believe those inventions have a creator. But the creation of god is just a coincidence I want you to think the models that you have had taught on it. How do you believe that a person made a model of a human brain and do not believe that a creator actually made that brain that is made of billions of neurons and a device more complex than any device that any human made? Just How could all this happen in an explosion in the universe. (Ps: even if you don't believe in the quran with no knowledge about it. i still want you ti read the words i'm gonna write ) God says in his holy book : "Indeed, We created humans in the best form."(95/4) "Indeed, We have dignified the children of Adam, carried them on land and sea, granted them good and lawful provisions, and privileged them far above many of Our creatures."(17/70) "Do the disbelievers not realize that the heavens and earth were ˹once˺ one mass then We split them apart? ---And We created from water every living thing--. Will they not then believe?"(21/30) " Now you see the mountains, thinking they are firmly fixed, but they are moving the direction of clouds. the design of Allah, Who has mastered everything. Surely He is All-Aware of what you do."(27/88) "Have they not seen how Allah originates the creation then resurrects it? That is certainly easy for Allah." "Surely in this is a sign. Yet most of them would not believe." If you believe that there is a slightest chance of all of this creation to happened by coincidence let's say 10-²⁴⁴⁴⁴ chance . then the fact that my phone that i hold for exemple (or any other invention ) and the message i wrote with the humble english words i know is certainly a coincidence too. And you can't believe just one of them or you would have no logic . You only originally follow the unjustified suspicions in the first place . As god says: " although they have no knowledge of this. They follow nothing but assumptions. And surely assumptions can in no way replace the truth." " ...How can they then believe in falsehood2 and deny Allah’s favours?" 2) And this life is endless and short and we have a reason for making you guys repent and believe. that we seek for god reward and trying to fight the corruption you making so : "O my people! How is it that I invite you to salvation, while you invite me to the Fire! You invite me to disbelieve in Allah and associate with Him what I have no knowledge of, while I invite you to the Almighty, Most Forgiving. There is no doubt that whatever you invite me to . are not worthy to be invoked either in this world or the Hereafter.1 and indeed our return is to Allah, and the transgressors will be the inmates of the Fire. I you. it's not a matter of how much knowledge you have in the first place. It's a matter of how you think. How your mind work. Is it well or corrupted. You will remember what I say to you, and I entrust my affairs to Allah. Surely Allah is All-Seeing of all servants.” Tell me why you people seek and struggle to make us disbelief? Is it important to you that we disbelief . What you gonna benefit from this or benefit the humanity if we already gonna die. Surly you just fighting your nature and fighting yourselves to disbelief. 3) and i just wanna say something you atheists found it hard to understand.. I didn't say god made us perfect and no believer do and god haven't said we are perfect . We are not perfect and the proof of that that we need food. Drink and medicine and move . We're not motals and we need to work to get rewarded or get punished ...etc And god says: "We never require of any soul more than what it can afford. And with Us is a record which speaks the truth. None will be wronged." "...Are you rewarded except for what you used to do" "and that each person will only have what they endeavoured towards, and that ˹the outcome of˺ their endeavours will be seen " but i was talking about how much great inventions we are ..only god is perfect. 5) And god made an exemple of how believers think and how disbelievers think in this verse : "Surely Allah does not shy away from using the parable of a mosquito or what is upon it . As for the believers, they know that it is the truth from their Lord. And as for the disbelievers, they argue, “What does Allah mean by such a parable?” Through this , He leaves many to stray, and guides many. And He leaves none to stray except the rebellious-" Look at the question of the disbelievers in this verse and how the believers mind thought . And that's how exactly you think 6) God the creator is something unquestionable. if you're still have some light in your hearts . In the end i just wanna tell you believe in god the most merciful . The most knowledgable . Guid you to a straighter path in your life better than any other path you gonna take and more beneficial And think about your last so that god will reward you with a better than what he gave you in the first . "O my people! Worship Allah-you have no other god except Him. I truly fear for you the torment of a tremendous Day.” (Quran.com)
@@aimenedjebaili7459 well, yes, these chances are extremely low, however on a large enough timeline the chances of them happening actually greatly increase, and if the timeline is infinite, there is zero chances of these things not happening at one point or another. If you take a giant gumball machine and fill it with 10000 gumball, all blue but a single red one, the chances of getting the red one first try is 1/9999, but if you have infinite time and quarters, there is a 100%chance that you will get that red gumball. And saying "there is no proof against god" does not mean, by any chance, that God does exist, just like a lack of proof that I am not an alien does not prove I am an alien. There is no substantial proof for or against God, the general atheist population does not argue a God is impossible, they argue that there is not enough proof for it to be considered fact. Also, a God does not solve all of these problems, for example, how did he come into existence? How does he force everything to happen? And so on. Also, quoting a potentially man written piece of text is not proof God exists. There are texts that the Greeks claimed came from their gods, and yet does that mean the texts were true and their gods as such also? And as to you asking why atheists challenge your beliefs, few ever do just challenge your beliefs to "convert" you, a majority of the time it is done protecting their own beliefs and explaining why that is their belief, no different from you coming on here and saying why you believe God does exist.
@@braedengraham6239 Thank for the polite reply i hope you read every word i have wrote and understand them I hope. cause i think you have a different mind from other athiests. If you are. 1-first i'm not depending :on any assumptions . And that's the fault of most of man kind especially atheists who say that they follow only science and evidences. They are just closing their sights on litterally unfinished evidences and following assumptions and unjustified claims *in denying the fact that there is one god* . Such as the infinity assumption you brought up. Which is without the slightest doubt mere hiccups and another theory based only on a group of accumulated suspicions far removed from evidence and facts like the paradox theory or any other one. 2- comparing THE UNIVERSE with a gumball machine is absolutely absurd. More over i wanna ask you who did brought up this gumbell machine anyway . From where the gumball machine did come from to be see the results . 3- THE UNIVERSE was made from an explosing . I want you to tell me the possibility of making something have any meaning or sense or purpose or a job if you keep throwing *infinity* bombs at any materials for *infinity timeline* . Like the model of the cat example i mentioned earlier or anything else. If the possibility is 0 (not extremely low but 0) then how the chance of making a creature like the cat itself can be higher than 0 ? 4- i said in the beginning that examples that prove the fact that god exist are literally unfinished. And i mean it. The evidences that shows god exist aren't stopping (That doesn't mean i'm limitless in my mind but i mean that the more you think of the evidences the more they got bigger) and i made a little few examples of what i said. And there is no evidence denying the existance of GOD . I said facts and you said assumptions like infinity big bangs could make infinity universes . Alot of them or actually endless of them are 100% could be perfect . and i'm not kidding when i say perfect because of what studies show's (A small imbalance of rules leads to a total breakdown) *although they have no knowledge of this. They follow nothing but assumptions. And surely assumptions can in no way replace the truth* *Indeed, God keeps the heavens and the earth from falling apart. If they were to fall apart, none but Him could hold them up. He is truly Most Forbearing, All-Forgiving* Heavens = universe = سماوات 5- *god does not solve all the problems* . That's a wrong sentence. And you're not required to know these things like god existence or can god create a rock that even he can't hold .etc and again those are not proofs at all. God gave just few knowledge to humanbeings and what they can handle. You don't need to know these stuff . You don't need to know it. You're only required and responsible on your mind to look at the evidences of god and believe in it. If you objected it know that you're wronging yourself and unjust. God said: *They ask you about the spirit. Say, “Its nature is known only to my Lord, and you ˹O humanity˺ have been given but little knowledge* *and you have been given but little knowledge* And again those claims doesn't deny the existince of god. And god made an example how believers think and how disbelievers think in this verse : (Surely GOD does not shy away from using the parable of a mosquito or what is above it . *As for the believers, they know that it is the truth from their Lord* . And as for the disbelievers, *they argue, “What does Allah mean by such a parable?”* Through this , He leaves many to stray, and guides many. And He leaves none to stray except the rebellious-) 6-You see what i'm talking about ? (The fault of mankind) *assumptions* You judge that this book is from a man while you don't even know what's in it (or basically the main stream) . You assumed this And you haven't think (let's see maybe it's really from god) Actually there is tons of evidences deny the fact that this book can be make by a humanbeing and make sure that this is from a god . But as i said it's the matter of how much good your mind is to see it in the first place not how much informations you have. Without a proper mind the informations and knowledge are useless to see . Blinds . And god said (Through this , He leaves many to stray, and guides many. And He leaves none to stray except the rebellious) 7- *THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT POINT* That there is something athiests or the rest of disbelievers don't understand. They asking for proofs . God won't make a proof make both of falsehood people with bad minds and good mind people so that alk can believe and everyone succeed . There won't be any point from this anyway. We won't have a minute on earth like that . *Like imagine giving a test to students with answers with it there won't be any point of the test and that won't be fair to students* So you might wanna ask yourself (maybe i'm gonna really fail and get punished if i keep up with this ideology (mind)) God says: They say, “Why has no angel come with him?” and if we had sent down an angel, (the matter would have certainly been settled ˹at once˺,1 and they would have never been given more time ˹to repent˺.!) *the matter would have certainly been settled and they would have never been given more time* And he said : Allah said, “Descend, both of you, from here together ˹with Satan˺ as enemies to each other. Then when guidance comes to you from Me, whoever follows My guidance will neither go astray nor suffer. But whoever turns away from My Reminder will certainly have a miserable life,1 then We will raise them up blind on the Day of Judgment.” I want you to focus on *But whoever turns away from My Reminder* 8- and yes there is different. The reason why i asked that is because i wanna make those disbelievers see that they just fighting the beliveing in god inside them without evidences . Just assumptions. through the contradictions in themselves . I have a reason to make them believe. Is first, that i'm gonna get reward crom god with that Second, i wanna be a reformer and that's another job i need to do in my life unless god punish me. With stopping those evil thoughts of disbelievers because they don't worth be successor to the earth. Because They will spoil it for sure because of less knowledge about what is right and what is wrong and because *they have no reason to reform and work in a good way* in the first place. They fighting that nature of working good. Third. I do it to make my believe get stronger and i think maybe this is a common point between me and disbelievers. (They wanna do this to make their assumptions about themselves being smarter comes true. And i do it to support the fact that god does exist) . So i have more reasons than athiests. Athiests supposed to have no reason to work good or to make me follow them . So why they are struggling ? that doesn't make sense ? They just fighting their nature. *Surely those who dispute Allah’s signs-with no proof given to them-have nothing in their hearts but greed for dominance, which they will never attain. So seek refuge in Allah. Indeed, He alone is the All-Hearing, All-Seeing.* Ps: i'm not a scholar in islam or know everything about kuran just a student in university. I know only little things and yet those things are enough to me to make me see the truth clearly. And i really hope that you read the last verse from quran that i have sent. more than 3 times and think about it . And if you have any questions to ask about something with the intentions of learning about it and get some informations and not with the intention to proof that i'm wrong i would love to try to answer .
Computer graphics would have also required that computers be powerful enough to do realistic enough computer graphics. One of the most powerful supercomputers at the time, the CDC 7600, could do about the sort of performance as a CPU from the late 1980's, before computer graphics techniques like digital compositing video became used. Lets say you could do something like this on the Cray-2, a very powerful supercomputer from 1985 which might not actually be possible given the details you need to integrate into the computer graphics, but lets assume I am being overly cautious. The Cray 2 is hundreds of times more powerful that the CDC 7600. So we need either tons of those (which themselves were likely too powerful at the time to be reliable, often breaking once a day) which is very, very expensive (5 million each) and the amount of people and development required to do computer graphics on the code side, or a hypothetical computer technology that was 15-20 years ahead of it's time, at which point that breaks a lot of history because it would be odd to make computers that powerful and then just abandon them. You would see some effects from it which we don't. Also the fact with rocketry is it was pretty well known the technology of the time (except the Russians were doing it better). People had been working on liquid rockets since the 30's at least. And most of the technologies needed or that would be useful for getting to the moon are all out there. They didn't just disappear. Stuff like the food testing equipment (since you don't want people getting sick in space), various fireproof fabrics, emergency blankets. Stuff like Cordless tools needed to be developed, and from some of these technologies would also directly come the modern style of fire rescue breathing aparatus.
Take "The Last Starfighter" as a baseline, which was about 18 months of rendering on a Cray Y-MP. You'd need a bunch of CDC 6600s to do that rendering, even discounting the fact that you'd need to start writing the software -- first of its kind -- some years before rendering started. Even starting in 1965 and buying up every CDC 6600 made -- somewhere around 100 -- they'd be lucky to get 10-30 minutes of video rendered at lower resolutions, but "Last Starfighter" complexity or much lower. Not remotely convincing.
The actress portraying the conspiracy theorist in this video did so very well. No matter how much evidence you give someone like that, you can’t reason with them. An argument not based on fact is one not based on reality.
“Good conspiracy theories” is an oxymoron. People believe this stuff for one reason. So they can feel special and act like they know something other people don’t. And in reality they have absolutely no qualifications to make those conclusions. Listen to the experts.
here the problem Soviet Union would have know if we had faked the moon landing because a spy would have informed the USSR that we faked the landing, and then the Soviet's would have proceed to land on the moon and put the flag of the USSR up.
When you think about it its like a dad being hella proud for running a marathon then the kids being like "Lol dad? Really? You probably bought the medal from a store."
Miss Marisa exactly....idk if people realize that saying you're something and showing it are two different things.. " I'm a skeptic"... a skeptic waits for viable empirical evidence... a skeptic doesn't look at that and say" must still be fake"... it's also the difference between alex jones tin foil hat conspiracy theorists and people that are skeptical about certain events and their motives...
That one's easy. Just ask anyone who works for an airline or who flies a lot. Our knowledge of Earth's geography is based on a spherical globe that wraps around itself. If the Earth is not a globe and thus doesn't wrap around, then that means that some part of our geography is wrong. Locations that are supposed to be close together (France and England, China and Japan) might in fact be on opposite ends of the earth and require a total flyover of the entire planet.
Another piece of evidence would be from the video footage, where the dust kicked up by the astronauts doesn't flake off as there is an absence of atmosphere. Also the almost nonexistent atmosphere is why the hills and faraway landscapes look so weird.
Mythbusters actually disproved several other bits of "evidence" that the moon landing was fake... -The flag moving in the "wind" that shouldn't be there? It was simply them moving the pole to sink it into the surface and the lack of air resistance made the flag move -The footprints on dry moon soil? Lunar soil is made of very sharp particles and thus don't need water to form a clear footprint -The weird shadows on some of the photos? The lunar soil is very reflective
i've never heard one for the flat earth either! i mean why would all of the world's governments collectively agree (something that's never happened before) on "keeping the truth" from the people that the earth is flat? why not world peace? smh
It should be routine to go to the moon these days, and there should be many bases on the moon, an American base, Russian, Chinese etc... they can't put a human that far into space because of radiation and extreme temperatures ... I'm afraid like so many others, you have been conned.
Because there are some people who are sad sacks who done nothing with their lives so they have to latch onto something to make themselves feel important or better than everyone else
Easier to convince someone of a lie than the truth. How much easier is it to tell a lie, than the truth? Just remember, the government would never lie to you :)
Because people distrust experts. They trust people they shouldn't be trusting, while distrusting people they should be trusting such as certified experts.
There's no point arguing with these people there's still a part of the lunar lander on the moon the we could see with telescopes. Which they would respond that NASA can't be trusted and the pictures are fakes
No he (tried to) ruin this one for people who believe in the conspiracy theory. Why I said "tried to" because those people don't care about arguments in the first place.
@@hello-cn5nh skeptics analyze facts and compare evidence. They are also open to changing their views provided solid evidence. The outright dismissal of which automatically invalidates the skepticism argument.
Lepong20 Keep believing in the fairy tale that space has become. No observable curvature from a plane, or anywhere for that matter. Look at the horizon next time your in one, you might learn something. Research flat earth.
The conspiracy theorists claim that either: 1. The US bought Soviet silence with massive grain shipments. Yep, nearly 50 years (and counting) of silence. That's a *lot* of grain. 2. The Soviets knew that going to the moon was impossible so they kept quiet out of relief that the Americans had faked it and that....OK yeah, that doesn't making any fucking sense at all, but that's conspiracy theorists for you. 3. The Freemasons and Illuminati control literally everything on the planet anyway and the Cold War itself was a complete facade and you're just a sheeple for believing anything but bizarre and convoluted conspiracy theories.
To that conspiracy, I would say the following: Even if they could buy the silence of the entire USSR and all its states, which didn't simply follow Moscow all the time and often did things their own way, there's independent countries like China, which by that time was nuclear-capable and had bad relations with both the USSR and the US. And in the late 1960's, China certainly wasn't getting a dime from the US; in fact, they were heavily supporting Vietnam with just about everything in its war with the US, and rebuked every diplomatic gesture of the US until the early 70's. So unless China had absolutely no idea about the US space program and *still* doesn't, then the idea that they were bribed into being quiet has no merit. And that's just China; the U.S. would have to fool every country with a good intelligence service that has a bone to pick with them in the entire world at this point, which is a LOT of countries.
Hissanrach The two most common responses I get to what you've said is: 1. An outright refusal to respond, or 2. The Illuminati control China too so none of what you said matters.
Yeah, if you show think inside the local crack house, you will hear cries of "propaganda" and people outraged that their baseless conspiracy is bullshit.
Random Gaming I believe you have missed something very important, it’s called a joke. When he says “on location,” he means the location is the moon. As in they shot it on the moon. Like not fake.
I looked up Apollo and Artimis and they were twins. The twin towers on 9/11 were also staged. Twin Peaks is an example of a very occult movie. Artemis had a lot of hunting dogs. This year is the chinese year of the dog.
@@fernthefox2826 I looked at 9/11 as many other people did. The towers came down in 9-13 seconds. It's impossible under Newton's laws that a tower that high could come down that fast in 9-13 seconds, due to fire. The only way this could be achieved is by removing the structure through demolition. I don't argue with Newton's laws. ---- If a airplane meets a steel structure, the plane should shatter. If you watch the video's from the twin towers, the planes did not only enter the twin towers, but also the nose of the plane came out intact on the other end. That's only possible in CGI-movies. ---- We should apologize to the victims in the middle east. We had no reason to wage war against them, and take control of the oil.
@@alliesakat Well I was sitting home eating a Dorito, when the thought hit me, what if I say “This is such an *original* joke, how did you come up with it?”
My European friend: "Are you free this weekend?" Me an American: Sheds single tear Bald eagle screeches in the background Looks off into the sunset, "I'm always free."
Nice illusion there. We would only be "free" if we had no basic needs and necessities. Because we do need food, drink and shelter however, we are bound to numerous obligations and responsibilities.
Another funny thing: the moon landing video couldn’t be faked either. The frame rate would be a dead give away that it was filmed on film and not captured on video, the editing would have had to be inhumanly perfect for the film to work just to undo the previous problem, it would have taken 6 canisters of film to get it all (all of which would have to have been edited by hand leading to the previous problem being astronomically low) and stanly Kubrick was such a perfectionist he would have demanded they shoot on location anyways.
Right now, it's only people saying they're just here for the comment section, so while it's good to know you're all here for eachother, there's not much to see otherwise.
Andrey Korsakov ; so you're saying you believe it was faked!??!. I was in high school at the time. We watched it on tv at school and I can assure you that the technology to fake a realistic moon landing did not exist. The state of the art special effects were crude. Watch any sci- fi movie or tv show from that era and you'll see what I mean. The idea of the moon landing being faked came from the movie Capricorn One, which came out at least ten years after the moon landing. By that time special effects made faking it possible. I mean by then we had Star Wars and Alien was only about a year or so away. But in 1969- no way could we fake it.
It would have been harder to fake the moonlanding than actually going to the moon?!! What a ridiculous argument, how is going somewhere nobody ever went or knows how it looks like easier than faking it? How come the space craft isn't all dusty from the thrusters blowing up dust around it? The whole lazer argument is bs they could have used regular lighting with a filter that evenly distributes the lighting so you would have the same shadow effect ,and about those lazer reflective material, they say that you can now get reflection using lazer but I don't know if it's true,,you can just as well say that nasa put down a portal on the moon and they now regularly travel back and forth via that portal
@Wyatt F? We are talking about the 2016 election where Russians attempted to influence the election through Social Media accounts, fake news, Information etc. Multiple agencies have confirmed Russia's attempted interference.
Look, if you took a sample of 1000 people from Bronze Age Greece or Medieval Europe, a lower number of them would believe the world is flat, than would if you took the same sample today. You will never convince people who don't WANT to be convinced. Pride in ignorance and denial of intellectualism and science has almost become a mark of status in America and Europe today. I can only hope the cancer doesn't spread further.
oh so he was the 3rd guy no one remembers seriously everyone remembers buzz and neil but not the pilot ya know the guy who got them there and back safely
As if Stanley Kubrick, one of the most government-critical artists making film, wouldn't have immediately told the world about a massive government conspiracy
While I would defend this and say you should distinguish between fonts before lines, as a graphic designer the rule is to use as few fonts as possible and DEFINITELY not rely on a difference between them for a piece to be legible
Not to mention the slow motion camera wasn't there either. Theres no way we could have got that frame rate for that length of time to simulate the feeling of "weightlessness".
When someone tries to tell you about a conspiracy theory like the Moon landing being faked, just make them shut up by replying with an even more absurd conspiracy: "you still believe in the moon?? Pfffft"
also, you would need to be able to decrease the gravity in your studio by about 1/6th to make it believable that you can jump so high with so little effort. as computer graphics was not developed enough for that
Conspiracy theorists, explain this! If we didn't go to the moon how did Ms.Frizzle and her students get there? How did Wallace and Gromit get their cheese from the moon? Get dunked on.
way to copy the 20 other people commenting the exact same thing.. I know there is no way this many people thought of the same thing. bunch of fucking copy cat sheep.
The moon landing was, in fact, filmed by Stanley Kubrick. On the moon. They proposed doing it at the studio, but Kubrick, being Kubrick, decided that the only way to get it right would be to actually go to the moon.
No, of course it isn't, he was really persistent In getting to actually look like they were on the moon. So of course what any man would do, he went to the moon and set up a studio there. It's not hard to grasp
Joshua Cooper your so close but they actually filmed it on the sun to give of a more space vibe because nothing is more space then a flaming ball of gas
The most unrealistic part of this is that she actually paid attention instead of immediate denial and accusations.
yeah so inacurate
Yeah, it is a completely unrealistic portrayal of moon landing deniers/flat earthers.
Indeed. But most of the accurate conspiracy wacko shit we have documented for reference sadly came after this episode released
And she let him complete a single sentence before saying "but bro, you just gotta think about it"
Yeah and she was willing to have her mind change when she was proven wrong factually. Real life conspiracists would resort to denial and verbal attacks even if you prove them undoubtably wrong.
The fact that the Russians never even TRIED to claim it was fake if the most convincing proof i will ever need
Russians also never claim flatearthers are wrong
@@jojoaja6106 because that is American's thing (duh), and does not affect the Cold War, people was smart back then, there isn't such thing as flatearthers until, 21st century which somehow people's intelligence were worse than before?
Actually this is not true. Russia has plenty of conspiracy theorists and some have even claimed the moon landings are a hoax. Dmitry Rogozin, the head of Russia's troubled space agency Roscosmos, even joked about sending a probe to the moon to check.
@@TexMex421 Actually every country has it's conspiracy theorists. Even in my country, India. It's not about those idiots, it's about the space agencies and governments.
Neither did Vietnam, Cuba, Red China
Wrong Stanley Kubrick was such a perfectionist he Demanded it has to be on location.
WHAT DO YOU MEAN WE CANT FILM ON THE MOON? DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?
fucking Kubrick....Always demanding more than what they offer... XD
The outer atmosphere had to do. The rest was blue screen.
😂😂
@@everythingwithashton5876 I'm the goddamn batman!!!!!
I had a coworker who insisted that the moon landing was faked using alien technology from a crashed alien vessel. When asked why they didn't go to the moon using the alien technology, he got grumpy and said "that's not how it worked!!"
He's a troll. A troll who is sick of trolling but is addicted to it.
That's literally from the season of American horror story where they just gave up
It warms my heart that the Russian cosmonauts in their space station were actually cheering and saluting with vodka as they watched the American landing, and that NASA left a plaque on the Moon in memory of 14 fallen US astronauts _and_ USSR cosmonauts.
I know right
Yes
To them it wasn’t a war as it was to their leaders. It was just a friendly race for the good of humanity. I find that thought comforting
Wholesome if true
@@orestisgeorgatos6725 THIS! Let's have a science competition where everyone is a winner and fck governments of both countries I'm sick of their shit
Not accurate, the ‘sceptic’ didn’t scream at the top of her lungs once you disproved her
*Karen has entered the chat*
Lol
That happened way more than u think
Not enough screeching
And she didn't say, "Believe what you like, paid shill!"
The spaceship was obviously a paid actor
I was waiting for that joke
Thank you
Worst thing again: he was underpaid.
LOL I LOVE THIS JOKE
Soul Patch the moon was too
Can't wait to wooosh someone
The fact that we had the technology to put someone on the moon, but not accurately fake it amuses me somehow.
I mean yeah literally we could make giant pyramids with just slaves in 5000 BC
@@BananawithJaundice The pyramids being made by slaves thing is a myth, the people who built it where contracted and paid for their labor.
They even got buried near the pyramids that they worked on, I believe with valuable goods to ensure that their work wasn't without gratitude.
Because you're thinking clearly and intelligently. This video does nothing more than say we say so so there. Useful idiots.
You how Cgi was back then
@@Alex.Johnsenit's told that way in basic education and old books about Egypt. And old books I mean before 2000.
Education books are often 20 years behind where science is today.
It was staged. But they wanted it to be realistic so they filmed it on-site.
That's right. You also don't need a permit to film there.
Now this is big brain
Lol
They could have done that without standing on it
mind blown
The 11k dislikes are from moon landing hoaxers who clicked on it thinking Adam was gonna debunk the landing.
I disliked it because i don't like the portrayal of the Russians.
tsioulak that’s respectable
@@tsioulak are you by any chance the owner of a laundromat? Also did you happen to watch a show called Mac & C.H.E.E.S.E.?
@@themaqueovelic2195 That's a FRIENDS joke i know that, but i don't get it.
@@tsioulak the owner of a laundromat in which Joey was trying to get his picture hung up refused to add him to the wall for his show due to the very reasons you expresed in your previous comment
Funny how the Russians accept that the Americans landed on the moon first but Americans themselves think it's a conspiracy. 😂
fruitea m The Russians picked up the radio signals FROM THE SKY so they know it was real. And no, we didn’t have the technology then to make reliable robots that could carry recordings of the fake video and execute all the maneuvers to be in the same place as the fake astronauts would be (two critical rocket burns, to park in lunar orbit and to come home, HAD to be done on the far side of the Moon out of contact with Earth), much less detect when something went wrong and INSTANTLY switch to a different video (and audio) recording of the SPECIFIC type of fake disaster as appropriate.
And if there had been ONE mistake detected by the Russians or anyone else (like the Australian team who had to step in for the tracking station that was supposed to pick up the landing and first steps at the last minute; find the movie “The Dish”), the reputation of the US in the world would have been worse than it will be by 2020 with Trump. TRYING AND FAILING would be less damaging than being caught FAKING. And EVEN IF the technology to fake it reliably enough not to get caught HAD been available at ANY price in 1969 (which it wasn’t), it would have cost MORE than the actual Apollo project did.
@@allanrichardson1468 what is this nonsense you just shat out?
Joe Swanson Just saying there was no PRACTICAL way to fool anyone with the ability to compare the live TV feed with radio signals containing the same information with what they picked up by pointing an ANTENNA AT THE MOON.
I went into some detail about the reasons for this, but if all you know about the Apollo project (and the Mercury and Gemini projects which preceded it) is that “NASA fed the world some TV broadcasts claiming we went to the Moon,” and if you don’t know anything about antennas and receivers, especially the Doppler effect, you may need to read up a bit on physics.
So what part do you consider to be “nonsense?” Details, please.
Reiian Plaier I mean that putting a fake space mission on the air from transmitters ACTUALLY mounted on SPACECRAFT, following the SAME paths through space as the faked astronauts would be following, would be the only way to convince observers capable of actually POINTING ANTENNAS at the sky, and it would be, EVEN TODAY, more expensive and more likely to be caught faking than actually sending astronauts up in spacecraft.
You think Russia excepts that? You need to wake up to the reality around you.
I like that she didn’t actually get convinced in the end, makes it that much more realistic
This is 5 minutes of a 30 minute show.
lmao true people and their tight grips in their beliefs, even when undebatable evidence is put infront of their face they still wont budge.
@@spill3105and that us why its impossible to reason with a conspiracy theorist
It ties in with the Emily Ruins Adam episode where she says some people don't want to change their minds and will hold onto their beliefs even moreso when someone challenges them.
I feel bad for people who worked really hard for the moon landing to happen only for some people to say "no you didn't"
@felix mendez are you with the same group of people who say the Earth is flat?
felix mendez Guys, I think I just found the flat-earther! Someone get my bleach!
@felix mendez oh well thanks anyways for that and I have no idea why this one comment has gone this far so I don't care at this point
It makes me sad people don't believe David Copperfield can really do magic. I guess we're not all program to believe in miracles.
@@somewhatinformed1208 🤣
Good one, you fooled me for a quite while, I actually believed that you were for real 😂
It was fake because Gru stole the moon in despicable me
The Minion Memer but the moon grew back and went back to space
@@birdsnestisstupid crap you're right
Gru stole it and brought to earth then they used doremon
I’m the woooosh tiger.
Infinite Dragonious I know it too!
The Russians never claiming we faked it should be the nail in the coffin on this.
Yes but there are still people on the comments that belive the moon landings are still fake, I don’t know how.
There is no reason for the USA to fake the moon landings instead of trying to actually get to the moon.
The earliest forms of guided missiles and munitions were already made by Nazi Germany (V1 and V2 rockets, Fritz X guided bombs), and computers were already in use during WW2 on US battleships and Bletchley Park in the UK. The scientists who worked on the guided missiles were also the same scientists who were hired by the USA to join NASA.
So the USA already had the technologies and Human Resources to work on getting to the moon especially after 20 years of tech advancements.
@@leehongjin6884 good point, also the first reply is my alt account.
They're behind a lot of conspiracies that sow distrust in the american government, so...
Yeah exactly it makes no sense they would be all up in our grill if there was even a hint it was faked
A detail they forgot to mention was that the dust in the footage reacts how dust in a vacuum would. It's flat with no poofing. In fact, the only way to have dust react flat like it did, is to have the entire set in a vacuum. A vacuum so large, that it would still be the largest vacuum ever made by a long shot.
Hi Omil, you mentioned that dust kicked up on the lunar surface will behave differently compared to an equilivent situation on Earth. A perfect example of this is the "Rooster Tail" dust trails kicked up by Apollo 16's John Young during his "Grand Prix" in April 1972. This very situation has been analysed, studied and the published results are easily obtained online. "Ballistic motion of dust in the Lunar Roving Vehicle dust trails", Hsu, Hsiang-Wen, Horányi, Mihály, (University of Colorado), American Journal of Physics, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp. 452-456 (2012). They conclude that the lack of particles’ deceleration along the x-axis of their coordinate system, could only be the case if Apollo 16’s rover footage was filmed in a vacuum and in an environment where the acceleration due to gravity = 1.6 m/s2. . Enjoy reading, take care.
Kubrick staged the moon landing,
But he was such a perfectionist, they had to shoot on location.
(I don't know who originally made that joke)
Yes. That's the joke.
+Stephen Palmer r/woosh
He filmed Full Metal Jacket in England. A movie about the Vietnam War.
LOL! That is brilliant. I'm stealing that thank you.
Thy joke is now mine.
It's sad because a person who thought the moon landing was fake wouldn't accept the reality like this lady. They would disagree on ANYTHING the smart person said
she does disagree later in the Episode
@@fjdpaco still
@Ethan Crowley yeah i just referat as 'smart person' as the person who understand normal stuff
@@daemoniumvenator7099 I think she just acting, because personally, I don't believe their is a moon.
ThE gOVeRnMeNT is LYING TO you, WAKE UP AMERICA
@@oddadvertisment3365bruh of course shes acting. I don't know if you're joking but there is a moon. Just look up at the night sky
Stanley Kubric would have insisted in shooting on location
Wasn't he was scared of flying?
Not Dave's Channel i think that joke flew right over your head
*kubrick screams in the background*
On VENUS! AROOOOOO!
And, if necessary, he'd go back over 100 times.
Adam, this is an argument you are never gonna win and with a quote from Bill Murray, “It is hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it is damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person.”
"Never argue with an idiot. They'll only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."
-George Carlin
@@Kieran_Davey ah George, ever the fountain of wisdom
I hope Adam Ruins the Flat Earth Theory in the future
StickMaster500 i hope so buddy
It ruins itself...
That's some REALLY low-hanging fruit there...
StickMaster500 moving from tf2 shitposting to adam ruins everything? Nice move
I agree I would enjoy that one as well. However I doubt they will since Neil deGrasse Tyson and many others have already taken it upon themselves to do that.
"The moon landing was FAKE!"
"Pfft, you believe in the moon?"
Moon truthers unite!
That joke made me laugh.
back to Tumblr you
From Fake facts 3, right?
is this a sorrowTV reference?
Conspiracies are getting better and better....
2020: Earth is fake
2021: We are fake
2022: *FAKE IS FAKE*
Satan's Grandchild lol
MATH IS MATH
I think we are on simulation theory now.
YOURE A FALSE FLAG TO TURN THE FROGS GAY
Lucifer's son Are you implying that 2020 is real?
The problem with debunking conspiracy theories is they can just claim its the conspiracy. You could take the worlds leading authority on the subject and they can just say they are part of the cover up. Its an argument style best suited for the lazy and unintelligent.
Well you know what they say”it’s hard to win an argument against a intelligence person. But impossible against a idiot.” Einstein I think.
Thank the gods I believe in obscure conspiracies that no one knows about and that DB Cooper survived.
How is it lazy and unintelligent? Especially when you are admitting you blindly follow authority. Critical thinking is good when it’s about stuff I don’t like, but when it’s about stuff I like it’s lazy and stupid right? Funny in your arrogance and condescension you expose yourself as a midwit that will just blindly believe whatever someone in a labcoat tells you
@@JA-jx1hk The point I made was that conspiracy theorists, even in the face of evidence will still just claim conspiracy and ignore the evidence. Thats what makes it lazy and most suited for the unintelligent because it requires little to no critical thinking. Yes we all have to blindly follow authorities all the time. If someone doesnt know how to fix their car they have to trust a mechanic, if people are sick they go to a doctor. They didnt watch the doctor graduate or monitor their entire educational pathway but they dont really have much choice. Now tell me more about how im a midwit.
@@DonnieDGaming by saying when “confronted with evidence” you further expose yourself as a midwit. What is evidence? Who affirms this evidence? Is a massive international institution signing off on a study as peer reviewed the only form of evidence? There was zero evidence presented in this video to debunk it and yet you still made your wild blanket statement that conspiracy theorists are lazy when in fact often times they research this stuff much more than the average TH-cam midwit making fun of them, they are literally obsessed with this stuff to a fault but you want to call them lazy and unintelligent simply because they aren’t satisfied with an authority figures answer. Also, you can learn to fix your own car, you can have someone teach you, you can do research on how a car works to where you have a better understanding of it in order to avoid being conned by a dishonest mechanic… Just by using that as an example you show how much of a midwit you are and ironically how intellectually lazy you yourself are. Just admit that “evidence” to you is merely a high production infantilized TH-cam video with some man child narrating it and a stamp from an organization you recognize and you’ll gladly just blindly accept it and call it a day lmao
Before i look through these comments tell my family i loved them
here the problem with faking the moon landing. the Soviet Union would have know if we had faked the moon landing because a spy would have informed the USSR that we faked the landing, and then the Soviet's would have proceed to land on the moon and put the flag of the USSR up.
why dont u do it yourself if its before u look.
Warning:If you hate me well dont look at this.
Hello.
My life on roblox is all about fun.
Im here for my bestfriend.Tiana
Shes a diamond.
Her name suits her cause shes a princess
Shes my life
No one can seperate us.
Yes we do fight.
But it only means we are true bestfriends.
I dont care how much you try to seperate us and steal her from me.
Beacause ill always protect her.
Shes not in the top t e n.
Shes in the top o ne :).
Shes such a good roleplayer.
She understands me.
She protects me.
She cares about me like I do.
Were twins even doe were not the same
Thats what we would say.
You can do what you want whit your little seperating plans.
But it will never work whit me and Tia.
I ♥ you Tia :)
+Johnny But if she's in the top one, then she's also in the top ten, because it goes one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, and one is before ten.
334 people are helping your boat to float
Haha, these people actually think there is a moon? The pictures are from the secret sun landing (during the night)
Thank you. That gave me a chuckle.
Oh, of course! Why haven't I heard this theory before?!?! ;)
MOON TRUTHERS UNITE
this needs to be pined
Sharwul But if they are in the sun, then where does the lighting come from? Checkmate.
This isn’t really, “Adam ruins the Moon Landings”. It should be, “Adam ruins it for idiots and confirms existing knowledge.”
Very true
ya, the comments here are testament to the intelligence level of fans of this channel. Especially all the "Kubrick perfectionist"comments. So witty and original.
Seems legit
Want to like but it's 666 so
No the moon landing was faked
Also, try dropping a hammer and a feather at the same height and moment on earth. The hammer always hits first because the atmosphere slows the feathers descent. Do it on the moon ( no atmosphere) and they always land at the same time. This experiment was performed on live tv on Apollo 15.
wooden hammer and fake feather with metal rod. Doesn't take a genious to do "magic"
@@ioodyssey3740What yk feathers are small and you could see it idiot try it out yourself
@@ioodyssey3740 The weight doesn't affect the speed, only the air resistance. So a wooden hammer would behave the same as a metal hammer.
@@theeyehead3437thank you. It’s not that hard to learn basic physics before one speaks
"Look at how bright it is!" Holy shit, it's almost like they're getting light from the sun.
@Tom Tříska If you think direct sunlight requires Earthlike atmosphere, you're an idiot.
Crazy 🧠💣💥
@Ameri CAN we do space walks on stations orbiting earth, which suffer from light warping thanks to gravity
Plus, a stadium light would still suffer the same shadow issues, did you not watch this video?
@Ameri CAN how do you know what the sun is _supposed_ to look like reflected on an astronaut's visor?
@@Silverwind87 I mean that's just basic science and is actually very easy to replicate on a scale model
I've got it!
The moon landings were faked on the moon!
@Henrique Ourives
Faked on the moon would be perfectly dumb by the way. You would already arrive there and potentially tease the other team, in this case, the Soviet Union. Plus, it would be a waste of money. Anyways, nice joke.
r/whooosh
Bet this will happen one day and one person will do it.
@@jamesn2473 damn that's good
Henrique Ourives you can’t fake a moon landing on earth you’d have to also use the laws of no gravity in space and that not really possible back then
@idkwhatimdoing yee
(Moron detected who cannot read what I said and wants to cause a stupid argument).
Edit: And I also said that his joke is (actually it is a "was" now) good. And plus, look at my reply too that was given months ago, no editing since. Good job, sir.
@idkwhatimdoing yee lmao imagine still using woooosh. Its a dumb meme now
The moon landing was faked. The director just wanted a really authenic set and went to the moon to film it.
Woooooosh
Destroyer Creater r/wooosh
@@destroyercreater98 Woosh
@@destroyercreater98 big woooosh buddy
Destroyer Creater WOOOOSH
One point that was entirely left out is that even if it was possible to fake it, they sill had to built gigantic, first of its kind rocket that has mathematically provably got the ability to get to the moon
Bro they just painted the sun white and filmed the landing there
he figured it out, take the shot
LOL XDDD
The next day AustinGainsAutism was terminated by the government.
U know too much...
AustinGainsAutism defo.your a true genius. ☺
Can Adam ruin the flat Earth theory...
Go on an aeroplane, take off, reach cruising altitude, look out the fucking window?
Chris Greene or the fact that central gravity completely ruins the theory of a flat earth...?
What "theory"?
It could be covered in an “ever wonder why?”
Skyswindler I hope your kidding
My favorite conspiracy theory is that Kubrick was hired to direct a phoney moon landing, but his perfectionist attitude made him film it on location on the moon
Oops
If you're interested, the Shining had a lot of messages Kubrick expressed in relation to the moon landing.
Yea and re write it everithing from scratch. The original script said "holy shit its freaking laika", instead of "is a small step for a men but a big step...
Not to mention he made Niel Armstrong re-do the first step on the moon more than 100 times.
fun film fact before he was fired colin trevorrow expressed interest in getting shots for star wars episode 9 in space the idea was he wanted to hire space x to shuttle a modified imax camera into orbit and basically get some shots of the big black it would have made history but also be astronomically expensive and disney shot him down and a year later he was fired
At this point, this show isn't "Adam Ruins Everything", but more like "Adam shows facts that every single person with a functioning brain should know".
Nah, he ruined this with his shallow, juvenile ways. When you're a bit older, you'll understand.
@@jonsmith3945 what's this "if you're older, you'll understand" crap lmfao.
I ain't intelligent enough to disprove what you're saying so I'll just make up some excuse and say that you are just a mere child and I know everything lmao.
@@overlordjay9807 Because this is a channel for juveniles and not a good source of scientific info. Therefore defenders of Adam strike me as young.
No, I don't know everything. I just know this channel is mostly bullshit.
@@overlordjay9807 If I've mischaracterized you, I apologize.
"Adam shows facts that every single person who believes anything mainstream media says should know". I fixed it for you.
Forgot to mention perhaps one of the best arguments against faking it. They would still have to launch all the giant rockets that millions of civilians witnessed and countries tracked over the sky. Just building and launching those rockets are perhaps the most expensive part of the project, may as well just use them to go there.
Ola Ruud Then they would have to fake the process of getting the astronauts out of the shuttle. To fake the moon landing would have been harder and more expensive than to just send people there and back to prove it. We went, we were there.
Yeah. But then again there are people that think the earth is flat and some imaginary friend that made the universe, was somehow distracted during ww2 but cares if they masturbate.
Ola Ruud You've seen the Mitchell and Webb sketch, right?
"Well, we'd have to build and launch a MASSIVE rocket of course."
"Why? We're not ACTUALLY sending anyone to the Moon, are we?"
"Well we'll need to build and launch the massive rocket so that if anyone asks "Well how did you GET to the Moon?" we'll be able to say "Well we went in that MASSIVE rocket you saw!"
Ola Ruud
"Now, what exactly IS the principle cost of actually just going to the Moon?"
"Well mostly it's the massive rocket."
They're all water pressure rockets. Just overcharged them with bike pumps.
If the entirety of the soviet union couldn't disprove the landing, than I don't think some random person on 4chan can prove it's fake.
aperture AI#2020 "u just ain't woke"
You got something there
I mean, it's been proven time and time again that random people on 4chan can do what entire law enforcement and government agencies can't, so that's not a very good argument
Lazypackmule Can I get some examples?
Chycreus Remember the Berkeley free speech bike lock incident? They were able to find the guy who did. Remember the “he will not divide us” thing? Yeah they figured that shit out quick
2017: The moon landing was fake
2018: The earth is flat
2019: America is fake
2020: The moon is fake
2021: Humans are fake
2022: The word fake is fake
2024: There are more than two genders
2025 humans are fake.
2016: The news is fake
Also some where in all of this time “oh my god she’s so fake.”
The 10k dislikers of the video are moon-landing-disbelievers.
Of all the old conspiracies, this one hits home the most with me. My dad, an aerospace engineer on the Gemini and Apollo projects said it best, like the reserved, serious and massively competent and capable man he is when upon Apollo 11's touchdown ...." YES ! "
Buzz Aldrin gave the best answer: a punch in the face!
@@julieporter7805 Buzz Aldrin, as much a LEGEND as Armstrong and Collins.
@@Dutch1954 All three of them were.
@@julieporter7805 Well aimed and powerful! One small punch by an old man, one powerful statement for all of mankind.
So when is Adam going to prove the earth is not flat?
I can see that logical thought isn't really your cup of tea now, is it? Did you miss the video saying that it was impossible to fake this?
Will Jacobs there's no economic benefit to going to the moon, that's why other countries haven't tried. The only reason the space race happened is because it was a dick measuring contest, not because there's gold to mine in the moon.
The benefit to going to the moon was to collect data and scientific research that you really can't can't get from looking at a telescope. And honestly, how is this not an economic benefit? If you have scientific information, you have the whole scientific community flocking to you for that same information. Therefore we have created an industry of science, technology, engineering, and math. Going to the moon wasn't just about the SPACE race, but it was also about the HUMAN race. It was about seeing our limitations. And also we don't only send people out to orbit, we also send space craft out further beyond the moon to take images and make scientific discoveries. Today, the Voyager 1 is the furthest traveling man made object, going beyond the solar system and it still sends scientific data to us each day. Sure there's no man on the craft, but to put a man on a space craft for 40 years and send him beyond the solar system to this day is still impossible. And sending people to the international space station also returns to us a lot of scientific research. It's a lab in space where we do things that we can't do on Earth. Nothing like this would even be possible without having started with at least the moon. Today going to the moon is impractical because we've already seen it all. There's no point anymore, we made it there and now we can focus on other things, like new planets across the universe in a different galaxy.
Just look at the damn horizon it's not that damn hard to understand
Musical Pop-tart by economic benefit, I'm mostly talking about quick money. Corporations and governments getting quick money. I don't think you can get that from the moon without sinking tons of dollars. I'm kind of pessimistic. While I do believe we would've gotten to the moon at some point, I believe that the cold war's rivalry was the main drive, despite what jfk or the US government say about it being human discovery as the main drive. I mean, all I have to do is look at the difference between NASA's budget back then and now. The difference is big, safe to say, without a rivalry. And that's why I think most countries haven't put in a real effort to go to mars or other planets. And honestly, I'm not complaining. Sinking lots of gov't money right now on space won't really go over well with the population of any country. Space is cool, and you can't really argue against the virtue of science, but you and I both know the majority have more concerns. Whereas in the cold war, the main concern was Russia and that's why sinking lots of money in it was acceptable.
Question: If the moon landing was fake, then why does it take so long to film a fake mars landing? It shouldn't be significantly harder, should it?
Because they have to first convince us that a Mars landing is possible!
Nah, JK!
Because mars is 102 times more farther than the moon and mars has an atmosphere
@@alonelyz1981 Yeah, that's why we haven't been to Mars. However, distance wouldn't be a factor if you want a *fake* landing.
@@alonelyz1981 Ie, faking a mars landing would be EASIER, as the conditions on the surface is FAR closer to that of earth.
Because people aren't stupid now and can tell what fake graphics are
Nothing makes me more happier than proving baseless conspiracy theories wrong
XD true
Not sure what your trying to say, US invading iraq for israel is considered a wild illogical theory. Can you prove that wrong please? Or go back to sucking upto people because you cant argue yourself.
They should make one on the existence of god to those who thinks wrongly like that girl maybe
To athiests:
i want you to take 4 minutes from your time and read this if you're a fair and a just person looking for truth as you claim.
1) i wanna tell you just one small little 2 comparative examples (ps: The few humble examples that I will mention do not mean that they are most of them. Indeed, examples are literally unfinished, but as I said, it is only the way your mind thinks) to show you that it's not a matter of knowledge and IQ to know there is a god. It does need a proper mind in the first place so you can use this knowledge to know that .
i want you to tell me the percentage of coincidence that your messages you sent to me were formed in which you used 26 letters to form them by randomly clicking while you closing your eyes . ?
I want you to tell me the chances of that phone you hold now to be made if i just throw a bomb in the air at some materials?
And then gather all of your informations about biology for exemple and tell me the chances of DNA who formed from nitrogenous bases, phosphoric acid, and others. Being created . And the chances of how this DNA tape that consist from 4 letters (A.T.C.G) can make several kinds of billions of proteins that each one of them have a specific job like
(Hormonal proteins Enzymatic proteins. Structural proteins .Defensive proteins .Storage proteins. Carrier proteins. Receptor proteins. Systolic proteins)
And tell me the chances of making constitute effective organs, each one has an important role in human life in order to exercise its anomalies
(The lymphatic system . The digestive system The respiratory system . The nervous system . The circulatory system . Endocrine system . The immune system . The lymphatic system . The muscular system . The urinary system . Skeletal system . The reproductive system )
And give me the percentage that multiple departments would be formed that would effectively perform their role for each of these devices .
And then the same way tell the percentage of this world with it's functions starting from the atoms. To the lands . Mountains. Load currents. And the creation of new lands and others disappear. and layers of the earth and layers of the sky preserving it. And a coincidence that forms water molecules. Then these are like the fuel that spreads life on the earth. Then think about what you know about the universe .
Like think of yourself opening your pc which is made with a very intelligence way ( the hardware and software) then you open an AR game for exemple and start creating your avatar. ( doing the hair and the size of eye and ... ) you can't say that this pc or this avatar you made came by chance. Like some bomb exploded and did all of that. You believe that those stuff have a creator. So why you don't believe that the (Mosquito) for exemple have a creator .
Infact if those avatars you created had some algorithm like humans minds . Most of them would believe that there is bomb made them and their world not a ( creator)
Look at these pictures in you head (imagine) and give me the percentage of making one by coincidence let's say after millions of years : a beginner paint of a cat with pen . Then imagine a professional paint of a cat that looks real. Then i want you to imagine a model of a cat.
If you say the chance of making this by coincidence is 0 so how could this cat in real life be made by a coincidence. by an explosion after millions of years.
I never heard about creating a meaningful paragraph by clicking randomly on the keyboard. Or create a library by throwing a bomb in a forest. If i told you that this could happened you wouldn't believe .
You keep talking about how the humanbody can't be made by god because of some claims that science already have answered on years ago like blind spot in the eyes (which is something important to the human eye) and the tail in some baby boomers (which is nothing but appendages that appear anywhere in a person and do not carry any vertebrae, bones, or spinal cord. Only appendages) and the rest of the
spread of this false and naive assumption by Darwin and those who imitated him in his idea of (archaeological or atrophic remnants) of the development in the human body such as the appendix, the ear protuberance and the endocrine glands !! (The errors of which modern science has revealed are all wrong,)
but you never believe that a car or any invention made by coincidence because it has some Design errors for example. Not to mention that humans never invented something more advanced, sophisticated and audited than humans themselves. actually there is no invention more superior than a fly. They are still trying to simulate the brain of a pigeon in the manufacture of aircraft, and they could not .
And yet you believe those inventions have a creator. But the creation of god is just a coincidence
I want you to think the models that you have had taught on it. How do you believe that a person made a model of a human brain and do not believe that a creator actually made that brain that is made of billions of neurons and a device more complex than any device that any human made?
Just How could all this happen in an explosion in the universe.
(Ps: even if you don't believe in the quran with no knowledge about it. i still want you ti read the words i'm gonna write )
God says in his holy book : "Indeed, We created humans in the best form."(95/4)
"Indeed, We have dignified the children of Adam, carried them on land and sea, granted them good and lawful provisions, and privileged them far above many of Our creatures."(17/70)
"Do the disbelievers not realize that the heavens and earth were ˹once˺ one mass then We split them apart? ---And We created from water every living thing--. Will they not then believe?"(21/30)
" Now you see the mountains, thinking they are firmly fixed, but they are moving the direction of clouds. the design of Allah, Who has mastered everything. Surely He is All-Aware of what you do."(27/88)
"Have they not seen how Allah originates the creation then resurrects it? That is certainly easy for Allah."
"Surely in this is a sign. Yet most of them would not believe."
If you believe that there is a slightest chance of all of this creation to happened by coincidence let's say 10-²⁴⁴⁴⁴ chance . then the fact that my phone that i hold for exemple (or any other invention ) and the message i wrote with the humble english words i know is certainly a coincidence too. And you can't believe just one of them or you would have no logic . You only originally follow the unjustified suspicions in the first place
. As god says: " although they have no knowledge of this. They follow nothing but assumptions. And surely assumptions can in no way replace the truth."
" ...How can they then believe in falsehood2 and deny Allah’s favours?"
2) And this life is endless and short and we have a reason for making you guys repent and believe. that we seek for god reward and trying to fight the corruption you making so :
"O my people! How is it that I invite you to salvation, while you invite me to the Fire!
You invite me to disbelieve in Allah and associate with Him what I have no knowledge of, while I invite you to the Almighty, Most Forgiving.
There is no doubt that whatever you invite me to . are not worthy to be invoked either in this world or the Hereafter.1 and indeed our return is to Allah, and the transgressors will be the inmates of the Fire.
I you. it's not a matter of how much knowledge you have in the first place. It's a matter of how you think. How your mind work. Is it well or corrupted.
You will remember what I say to you, and I entrust my affairs to Allah. Surely Allah is All-Seeing of all servants.”
Tell me why you people seek and struggle to make us disbelief? Is it important to you that we disbelief . What you gonna benefit from this or benefit the humanity if we already gonna die. Surly you just fighting your nature and fighting yourselves to disbelief.
3) and i just wanna say something you atheists found it hard to understand.. I didn't say god made us perfect and no believer do and god haven't said we are perfect . We are not perfect and the proof of that that we need food. Drink and medicine and move . We're not motals and we need to work to get rewarded or get punished ...etc
And god says: "We never require of any soul more than what it can afford. And with Us is a record which speaks the truth. None will be wronged."
"...Are you rewarded except for what you used to do"
"and that each person will only have what they endeavoured towards,
and that ˹the outcome of˺ their endeavours will be seen "
but i was talking about how much great inventions we are ..only god is perfect.
5) And god made an exemple of how believers think and how disbelievers think in this verse : "Surely Allah does not shy away from using the parable of a mosquito or what is upon it . As for the believers, they know that it is the truth from their Lord. And as for the disbelievers, they argue, “What does Allah mean by such a parable?” Through this , He leaves many to stray, and guides many. And He leaves none to stray except the rebellious-"
Look at the question of the disbelievers in this verse and how the believers mind thought . And that's how exactly you think
6) God the creator is something unquestionable. if you're still have some light in your hearts . In the end i just wanna tell you believe in god the most merciful . The most knowledgable . Guid you to a straighter path in your life better than any other path you gonna take and more beneficial And think about your last so that god will reward you with a better than what he gave you in the first .
"O my people! Worship Allah-you have no other god except Him. I truly fear for you the torment of a tremendous Day.”
(Quran.com)
@@aimenedjebaili7459 well, yes, these chances are extremely low, however on a large enough timeline the chances of them happening actually greatly increase, and if the timeline is infinite, there is zero chances of these things not happening at one point or another. If you take a giant gumball machine and fill it with 10000 gumball, all blue but a single red one, the chances of getting the red one first try is 1/9999, but if you have infinite time and quarters, there is a 100%chance that you will get that red gumball.
And saying "there is no proof against god" does not mean, by any chance, that God does exist, just like a lack of proof that I am not an alien does not prove I am an alien. There is no substantial proof for or against God, the general atheist population does not argue a God is impossible, they argue that there is not enough proof for it to be considered fact.
Also, a God does not solve all of these problems, for example, how did he come into existence? How does he force everything to happen? And so on.
Also, quoting a potentially man written piece of text is not proof God exists. There are texts that the Greeks claimed came from their gods, and yet does that mean the texts were true and their gods as such also?
And as to you asking why atheists challenge your beliefs, few ever do just challenge your beliefs to "convert" you, a majority of the time it is done protecting their own beliefs and explaining why that is their belief, no different from you coming on here and saying why you believe God does exist.
@@braedengraham6239 Thank for the polite reply i hope you read every word i have wrote and understand them I hope.
cause i think you have a different mind from other athiests. If you are.
1-first i'm not depending :on any assumptions . And that's the fault of most of man kind especially atheists who say that they follow only science and evidences. They are just closing their sights on litterally unfinished evidences and following assumptions and unjustified claims *in denying the fact that there is one god* . Such as the infinity assumption you brought up. Which is without the slightest doubt mere hiccups and another theory based only on a group of accumulated suspicions far removed from evidence and facts like the paradox theory or any other one.
2- comparing THE UNIVERSE with a gumball machine is absolutely absurd. More over i wanna ask you who did brought up this gumbell machine anyway . From where the gumball machine did come from to be see the results .
3- THE UNIVERSE was made from an explosing . I want you to tell me the possibility of making something have any meaning or sense or purpose or a job if you keep throwing *infinity* bombs at any materials for *infinity timeline* . Like the model of the cat example i mentioned earlier or anything else. If the possibility is 0 (not extremely low but 0) then how the chance of making a creature like the cat itself can be higher than 0 ?
4- i said in the beginning that examples that prove the fact that god exist are literally unfinished. And i mean it. The evidences that shows god exist aren't stopping (That doesn't mean i'm limitless in my mind but i mean that the more you think of the evidences the more they got bigger) and i made a little few examples of what i said. And there is no evidence denying the existance of GOD . I said facts and you said assumptions like infinity big bangs could make infinity universes . Alot of them or actually endless of them are 100% could be perfect . and i'm not kidding when i say perfect because of what studies show's (A small imbalance of rules leads to a total breakdown)
*although they have no knowledge of this. They follow nothing but assumptions. And surely assumptions can in no way replace the truth*
*Indeed, God keeps the heavens and the earth from falling apart. If they were to fall apart, none but Him could hold them up. He is truly Most Forbearing, All-Forgiving*
Heavens = universe = سماوات
5- *god does not solve all the problems* .
That's a wrong sentence. And you're not required to know these things like god existence or can god create a rock that even he can't hold .etc and again those are not proofs at all. God gave just few knowledge to humanbeings and what they can handle. You don't need to know these stuff . You don't need to know it. You're only required and responsible on your mind to look at the evidences of god and believe in it. If you objected it know that you're wronging yourself and unjust.
God said: *They ask you about the spirit. Say, “Its nature is known only to my Lord, and you ˹O humanity˺ have been given but little knowledge*
*and you have been given but little knowledge*
And again those claims doesn't deny the existince of god. And god made an example how believers think and how disbelievers think in this verse :
(Surely GOD does not shy away from using the parable of a mosquito or what is above it . *As for the believers, they know that it is the truth from their Lord* . And as for the disbelievers, *they argue, “What does Allah mean by such a parable?”* Through this , He leaves many to stray, and guides many. And He leaves none to stray except the rebellious-)
6-You see what i'm talking about ? (The fault of mankind) *assumptions*
You judge that this book is from a man while you don't even know what's in it (or basically the main stream) . You assumed this And you haven't think (let's see maybe it's really from god)
Actually there is tons of evidences deny the fact that this book can be make by a humanbeing and make sure that this is from a god . But as i said it's the matter of how much good your mind is to see it in the first place not how much informations you have. Without a proper mind the informations and knowledge are useless to see . Blinds . And god said (Through this , He leaves many to stray, and guides many. And He leaves none to stray except the rebellious)
7- *THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT POINT*
That there is something athiests or the rest of disbelievers don't understand. They asking for proofs . God won't make a proof make both of falsehood people with bad minds and good mind people so that alk can believe and everyone succeed . There won't be any point from this anyway. We won't have a minute on earth like that .
*Like imagine giving a test to students with answers with it there won't be any point of the test and that won't be fair to students*
So you might wanna ask yourself (maybe i'm gonna really fail and get punished if i keep up with this ideology (mind))
God says: They say, “Why has no angel come with him?” and if we had sent down an angel, (the matter would have certainly been settled ˹at once˺,1 and they would have never been given more time ˹to repent˺.!)
*the matter would have certainly been settled and they would have never been given more time*
And he said : Allah said, “Descend, both of you, from here together ˹with Satan˺ as enemies to each other. Then when guidance comes to you from Me, whoever follows My guidance will neither go astray nor suffer.
But whoever turns away from My Reminder will certainly have a miserable life,1 then We will raise them up blind on the Day of Judgment.”
I want you to focus on *But whoever turns away from My Reminder*
8- and yes there is different. The reason why i asked that is because i wanna make those disbelievers see that they just fighting the beliveing in god inside them without evidences . Just assumptions. through the contradictions in themselves . I have a reason to make them believe. Is first, that i'm gonna get reward crom god with that
Second, i wanna be a reformer and that's another job i need to do in my life unless god punish me. With stopping those evil thoughts of disbelievers because they don't worth be successor to the earth. Because They will spoil it for sure because of less knowledge about what is right and what is wrong and because *they have no reason to reform and work in a good way* in the first place. They fighting that nature of working good.
Third. I do it to make my believe get stronger and i think maybe this is a common point between me and disbelievers. (They wanna do this to make their assumptions about themselves being smarter comes true. And i do it to support the fact that god does exist) .
So i have more reasons than athiests. Athiests supposed to have no reason to work good or to make me follow them . So why they are struggling ? that doesn't make sense ? They just fighting their nature.
*Surely those who dispute Allah’s signs-with no proof given to them-have nothing in their hearts but greed for dominance, which they will never attain. So seek refuge in Allah. Indeed, He alone is the All-Hearing, All-Seeing.*
Ps: i'm not a scholar in islam or know everything about kuran just a student in university. I know only little things and yet those things are enough to me to make me see the truth clearly. And i really hope that you read the last verse from quran that i have sent. more than 3 times and think about it .
And if you have any questions to ask about something with the intentions of learning about it and get some informations and not with the intention to proof that i'm wrong i would love to try to answer .
Computer graphics would have also required that computers be powerful enough to do realistic enough computer graphics. One of the most powerful supercomputers at the time, the CDC 7600, could do about the sort of performance as a CPU from the late 1980's, before computer graphics techniques like digital compositing video became used. Lets say you could do something like this on the Cray-2, a very powerful supercomputer from 1985 which might not actually be possible given the details you need to integrate into the computer graphics, but lets assume I am being overly cautious. The Cray 2 is hundreds of times more powerful that the CDC 7600.
So we need either tons of those (which themselves were likely too powerful at the time to be reliable, often breaking once a day) which is very, very expensive (5 million each) and the amount of people and development required to do computer graphics on the code side, or a hypothetical computer technology that was 15-20 years ahead of it's time, at which point that breaks a lot of history because it would be odd to make computers that powerful and then just abandon them. You would see some effects from it which we don't.
Also the fact with rocketry is it was pretty well known the technology of the time (except the Russians were doing it better). People had been working on liquid rockets since the 30's at least. And most of the technologies needed or that would be useful for getting to the moon are all out there. They didn't just disappear. Stuff like the food testing equipment (since you don't want people getting sick in space), various fireproof fabrics, emergency blankets. Stuff like Cordless tools needed to be developed, and from some of these technologies would also directly come the modern style of fire rescue breathing aparatus.
This took a while to read, but I'm glad I did.
yea cgi wasnt neccsicary just shiity angles
and blurred vision
Taking it to the computer graphics (and lasers) off the lighting tech was a good trick!
Dato curioso:la computadora de tu casa es mucho más avanzada que las que tenían la nasa en el apolo 11
Take "The Last Starfighter" as a baseline, which was about 18 months of rendering on a Cray Y-MP. You'd need a bunch of CDC 6600s to do that rendering, even discounting the fact that you'd need to start writing the software -- first of its kind -- some years before rendering started. Even starting in 1965 and buying up every CDC 6600 made -- somewhere around 100 -- they'd be lucky to get 10-30 minutes of video rendered at lower resolutions, but "Last Starfighter" complexity or much lower. Not remotely convincing.
The actress portraying the conspiracy theorist in this video did so very well. No matter how much evidence you give someone like that, you can’t reason with them. An argument not based on fact is one not based on reality.
Brandon Adam That's a good way to lose your mind.
I think the moon landing is real but there are some good conspiracy theories out there not the moon ones though
Sam you did watch this full episode and you can't be a flat earth person because they say moon landing did not happen
Sam Wallace what type of conspiracy.
“Good conspiracy theories” is an oxymoron. People believe this stuff for one reason. So they can feel special and act like they know something other people don’t. And in reality they have absolutely no qualifications to make those conclusions. Listen to the experts.
Stanley Kubrick was hired to fake the moon landing.... hes just such a perfectionist he had it shot on site
here the problem Soviet Union would have know if we had faked the moon landing because a spy would have informed the USSR that we faked the landing, and then the Soviet's would have proceed to land on the moon and put the flag of the USSR up.
Yesssssssss
USA and USSR had/have the same paymasters. Problem solved.
Robomerc true. The USSR spies were smart and was one of the strongest countries.
Who would those be?
Maybe the leader of the world is truly Scotland and no one knows?
Everyone knows Kubric shot the moon landing but the guy was such a perfectionist he insisted on filming on location
xdante619 And where was A Space Odyssey filmed? In space?
Lmao
LOL, the perfect compromise of how it happened.
Omg
Original comment /s
I heard that Kubrick was directing the fake footage, but he was such a perfectionist he insisted that they shoot on location.
When you think about it its like a dad being hella proud for running a marathon then the kids being like "Lol dad? Really? You probably bought the medal from a store."
permission to steal and post on r/showerthoughts?
Sure?
permission to repost without credit on 5 different subreddits?
ye
NEIN!
Being a skeptic is different than being stupid and denying facts. Being a skeptic allows you to question things without proper evidence.
Miss Marisa exactly....idk if people realize that saying you're something and showing it are two different things.. " I'm a skeptic"... a skeptic waits for viable empirical evidence... a skeptic doesn't look at that and say" must still be fake"... it's also the difference between alex jones tin foil hat conspiracy theorists and people that are skeptical about certain events and their motives...
theyre not skeptics theyre deniers, people that say other people are wrong just because...
Miss Marisa What? It allows you to question things without evidence? Am I reading this right?
Miss Marisa You just played yourself, but nevermind me and go along you own stupid business.
We know that captain obvious :)!
Do a quick one like how the Earth isn't flat
@Nate W well there's still thousands of people thinking the world is flat
I don't think that's how it works... Adam only tells the Facts... Sorry :D
But... it is.
We need to prove that it's a Swasika
That one's easy. Just ask anyone who works for an airline or who flies a lot. Our knowledge of Earth's geography is based on a spherical globe that wraps around itself. If the Earth is not a globe and thus doesn't wrap around, then that means that some part of our geography is wrong. Locations that are supposed to be close together (France and England, China and Japan) might in fact be on opposite ends of the earth and require a total flyover of the entire planet.
There are STILL people saying its fake in the comments. Have you not watched the video. Honestly.
*You're always making fun of our vegemite!*
True...
because its terrible, i have a hard time find friends, family or coworkers who actually like vegemite
Tico2858 i actually like it
Lazerbeam lol
HE WAS EATING SPOONFULS, HE’S GOING TO DIE
What is Vegemite, and why does it make me think of LooneyToons?
Guys thinking the moonlanding was fake, pfffft ...
they believe in the moon ?
MOON-TRUTHERS UNITEE
Me me big boy
me me big boy
Alexander Hamelton is jesus
me me biiig boy
Showed this to my mum.
She still doesn’t believe it was real.
smh
Your mother is a very skeptical. Follow her example don't follow the sheep.
Just wait for natural selection to take its course
K 9 Poodle is the video not enough for you
Aren’t you also sheep because your also following someone else’s beliefs
Bobbydoc01 Natural Selection works against us for some Reason. People are getting Dumber.
Another piece of evidence would be from the video footage, where the dust kicked up by the astronauts doesn't flake off as there is an absence of atmosphere. Also the almost nonexistent atmosphere is why the hills and faraway landscapes look so weird.
Mythbusters actually disproved several other bits of "evidence" that the moon landing was fake...
-The flag moving in the "wind" that shouldn't be there? It was simply them moving the pole to sink it into the surface and the lack of air resistance made the flag move
-The footprints on dry moon soil? Lunar soil is made of very sharp particles and thus don't need water to form a clear footprint
-The weird shadows on some of the photos? The lunar soil is very reflective
Pfft, they believe in the moon?
Ahh, nice to see a fellow Moon Truther
I believe the sun is flat, the moon is fake, and Earth is reptilian
The Sun would taste like a giant potato chip. You can't disprove it though, it's a bit hot to eat.
That's true.
pfft they beleive in the earth
Next destroy the flat earth society
Going to the moon already destroys flat earth
Why not start with flat mooners?
mak&chez04 Common Sense can destroy the flat Earth.
Debunking flat earthers is like shooting fish in a barrel. There's really no challenge or effort needed.
cloudsweapon567 That is a true comparison, all you need is common sense and they're destroyed.
"Honesty Peter.....
You make me furious."
why did i read this in doctor hardmans voice
Hahaha😂
I have never heard a convincing, or coherent, explanation for WHY NASA would fake it.
@TraceOfMatter and how exactly is that an explanation for anything?
i've never heard one for the flat earth either! i mean why would all of the world's governments collectively agree (something that's never happened before) on "keeping the truth" from the people that the earth is flat? why not world peace? smh
@@antn3II también para que el calentamiento global es falso que ganarían con que todos creamos que vamos a morir
The government gave Stanley Kubrick a limitless budget to fake the moon landing, so he filmed on location.
Hahaha at first I didnt get it and thought it was a "moon landing was fake" comment but this gave me a good chuckle.
Thats Why America has so much depht...
its a joke. also that isnt why they do.
just a joke
TheGoldenBoot
"depht" XD
Unless it was faked ON the moon!!!!
The conspiracy lives on
Duh duh DUHHHHH
Bruh
Paul Nong MY MAN
Mind = blown
People on Mars in 2238, "Mars is flat!!!!!"
Mars is fake, wake up sheeple!
Sebastião Mendonça, I sincerely hope that's a joke... It's sad that I honestly can't tell.
how can they name a date? there may already be beings under the surface and even on it.
Christ Puncher if the word "sheeple" is in a given sentence it probably is a joke.
@@sebastiaomendonca1477 then you clearly do not know flat earthers
It's sad that Adam has to waste his time proving this wrong. It's so obvious it was not fake. Why do people think this
It should be routine to go to the moon these days, and there should be many bases on the moon, an American base, Russian, Chinese etc... they can't put a human that far into space because of radiation and extreme temperatures ... I'm afraid like so many others, you have been conned.
Because there are some people who are sad sacks who done nothing with their lives so they have to latch onto something to make themselves feel important or better than everyone else
Easier to convince someone of a lie than the truth. How much easier is it to tell a lie, than the truth? Just remember, the government would never lie to you :)
Because people distrust experts.
They trust people they shouldn't be trusting, while distrusting people they should be trusting such as certified experts.
@@bizzjoe It's just that it costed an unsustainable amount of money for each launch, and we had other funding priorities such as the vietnam war.
video: here have evidence
conspiracists: _slams hand on table_ i plAY MY DENIAL CARD
Kevin Signorelli your jokimg...right
There's no point arguing with these people there's still a part of the lunar lander on the moon the we could see with telescopes. Which they would respond that NASA can't be trusted and the pictures are fakes
Pfft... You believe in the Moon?...
Uncorkedscotty I don't. I'm a full on *MOON-TRUTHER!*
Uncorkedscotty 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
Adam didn't ruin this one he actually made some sense.
No he (tried to) ruin this one for people who believe in the conspiracy theory. Why I said "tried to" because those people don't care about arguments in the first place.
Conspiracits: give us some evidence!
*gives evidence*
Conspiracist: no not like that!
@@hjubris skepticism =/= CoNsPiRaCy tHeOrY
@@hello-cn5nh skeptics analyze facts and compare evidence. They are also open to changing their views provided solid evidence. The outright dismissal of which automatically invalidates the skepticism argument.
@@AlexNotFound404sure, uhuh... I'm skeptical of your claim
I like how the USA is skeptical of their own moon landing, when the rest of the world is like "yep, you guys did that"
Specta Exactly.
Only in the US am I right
"Did we tho"
Specta Im from australia and sometimes I wonder about it.
It was the pinnacle of the cold war around the time of that era afterall.......
Specta its not really Americans, just people who huff paint, which statistically is mostly Americans.
4:32 is really every conspiracy theorist when their claims go downwards lol
Next: Why the Earth CAN’T Be Flat
jademarissa
Look, I've traveled around the globe and I can't find a single piece of evidence that shows that the world is round
Lepong20 haven't found a single proof it's flat, but I have been in a plane.
... guys
I said around the globe, as in sphere, ball, round etc
Twas a joke
I was in space, earth is round...
Lepong20 Keep believing in the fairy tale that space has become. No observable curvature from a plane, or anywhere for that matter. Look at the horizon next time your in one, you might learn something. Research flat earth.
The Soviets were watching Americas every step like hawkeye and would have immediately call out on the fake landing if it was fake.
The conspiracy theorists claim that either:
1. The US bought Soviet silence with massive grain shipments. Yep, nearly 50 years (and counting) of silence. That's a *lot* of grain.
2. The Soviets knew that going to the moon was impossible so they kept quiet out of relief that the Americans had faked it and that....OK yeah, that doesn't making any fucking sense at all, but that's conspiracy theorists for you.
3. The Freemasons and Illuminati control literally everything on the planet anyway and the Cold War itself was a complete facade and you're just a sheeple for believing anything but bizarre and convoluted conspiracy theories.
If anything, it was the soviets who would have started these conspiracy theories to undermine it.
KGB definitely started some pretty heinous rumors to destabilize the West.
To that conspiracy, I would say the following: Even if they could buy the silence of the entire USSR and all its states, which didn't simply follow Moscow all the time and often did things their own way, there's independent countries like China, which by that time was nuclear-capable and had bad relations with both the USSR and the US. And in the late 1960's, China certainly wasn't getting a dime from the US; in fact, they were heavily supporting Vietnam with just about everything in its war with the US, and rebuked every diplomatic gesture of the US until the early 70's. So unless China had absolutely no idea about the US space program and *still* doesn't, then the idea that they were bribed into being quiet has no merit. And that's just China; the U.S. would have to fool every country with a good intelligence service that has a bone to pick with them in the entire world at this point, which is a LOT of countries.
Hissanrach
The two most common responses I get to what you've said is:
1. An outright refusal to respond, or
2. The Illuminati control China too so none of what you said matters.
Honestly getting a conspiracy theorist to agree with any of this is more of a fantasy than faking the moon landing.
Yeah, if you show think inside the local crack house, you will hear cries of "propaganda" and people outraged that their baseless conspiracy is bullshit.
I question you account since not one person follows you after 4 years
@@averageeveryone7162 there’s no follow system on TH-cam, besides Junk Scrap has never made a single video which negates any incentive to subscribe.
I love how Adam isn’t even ruining anything and he is actually making me happy.
Adam Ruins Conspiracy Theorists
The moon is a hologram made by Tupac. Spread the word
Minifridge Spread the word!
the word
Holograms are a Tupac made by the moon. Spread the word
the n word
Lol
Guys! It’s obviously fake! Except for the fact that the actor demanded to shoot on-location.
nice
Random Gaming I believe you have missed something very important, it’s called a joke. When he says “on location,” he means the location is the moon. As in they shot it on the moon. Like not fake.
Digital Arson
Ah I see, my bad
Ehm ehm turkey oils to get to the moon
Finally someone with real humour.
"An astronomical number of people" God damn it .
I don't know if this is the right space for that joke.
MariaThePotterNut ba dum crash
Ronan Campbell I didn't notice until I read this
Not only that, but what would NASA gain from lying?"you know what John,let's lie about goin to the moon for no reason at all"
Well, they'd win the space race? This was in the middle of the cold war after all
@S P I don't believe that the moon landing was faked man. OP asked for a motive so I gave him one
@@idunnodo1142 yes, because the Soviets would've definitely gone along with the lie and admitted defeat.
But why did they call it the Apollo mission If they went to the moon and not the sun? They should've called it the artimis mission
I looked up Apollo and Artimis and they were twins.
The twin towers on 9/11 were also staged.
Twin Peaks is an example of a very occult movie.
Artemis had a lot of hunting dogs. This year is the chinese year of the dog.
@@reallyme3573 what?! Why would you say that such a horrible event was staged? That is disrespectful to the people who were killed. Moron
@@fernthefox2826 I looked at 9/11 as many other people did. The towers came down in 9-13 seconds.
It's impossible under Newton's laws that a tower that high could come down that fast in 9-13 seconds, due to fire. The only way this could be achieved is by removing the structure through demolition.
I don't argue with Newton's laws.
----
If a airplane meets a steel structure, the plane should shatter.
If you watch the video's from the twin towers, the planes did not only enter the twin towers, but also the nose of the plane came out intact on the other end. That's only possible in CGI-movies.
----
We should apologize to the victims in the middle east. We had no reason to wage war against them, and take control of the oil.
really me its year of the pig mate
@@holygrandpas1141 Now it's the chinese year of the dog. The chinese new year is on februari 5th.
They were planning on faking it, but Kubrick insisted on filming on location.
Lol
This is such an *original* joke how did you come up with it?
@@lampinasuit892 this is such an original reply to this joke how did you come up with it?
@@alliesakat Well I was sitting home eating a Dorito, when the thought hit me, what if I say “This is such an *original* joke, how did you come up with it?”
If I hear this worn out line once more .... jeez
My European friend: "Are you free this weekend?"
Me an American: Sheds single tear
Bald eagle screeches in the background
Looks off into the sunset, "I'm always free."
While guns and fireworks go off in the background as a camera pans away from you saluting
This is a great comment
Nice illusion there. We would only be "free" if we had no basic needs and necessities. Because we do need food, drink and shelter however, we are bound to numerous obligations and responsibilities.
MURICA
@@owenc4967 and a squadron of F-35 flying above
Another funny thing: the moon landing video couldn’t be faked either. The frame rate would be a dead give away that it was filmed on film and not captured on video, the editing would have had to be inhumanly perfect for the film to work just to undo the previous problem, it would have taken 6 canisters of film to get it all (all of which would have to have been edited by hand leading to the previous problem being astronomically low) and stanly Kubrick was such a perfectionist he would have demanded they shoot on location anyways.
I am here only for comment section
Andrey Korsakov me 2
Right now, it's only people saying they're just here for the comment section, so while it's good to know you're all here for eachother, there's not much to see otherwise.
Andrey Korsakov ; so you're saying you believe it was faked!??!. I was in high school at the time. We watched it on tv at school and I can assure you that the technology to fake a realistic moon landing did not exist. The state of the art special effects were crude. Watch any sci- fi movie or tv show from that era and you'll see what I mean. The idea of the moon landing being faked came from the movie Capricorn One, which came out at least ten years after the moon landing. By that time special effects made faking it possible. I mean by then we had Star Wars and Alien was only about a year or so away. But in 1969- no way could we fake it.
I’m always here for the comment section
It would have been harder to fake the moonlanding than actually going to the moon?!! What a ridiculous argument, how is going somewhere nobody ever went or knows how it looks like easier than faking it? How come the space craft isn't all dusty from the thrusters blowing up dust around it? The whole lazer argument is bs they could have used regular lighting with a filter that evenly distributes the lighting so you would have the same shadow effect ,and about those lazer reflective material, they say that you can now get reflection using lazer but I don't know if it's true,,you can just as well say that nasa put down a portal on the moon and they now regularly travel back and forth via that portal
Russia: "You beat us fair and square but we will get you back in 2016."
I just died!
@@kellypaul4507 no u
Dear god this is a nightmare
This video was released in 2017
Yeah, a year after they meddled in the elections, your point?
@Wyatt F? We are talking about the 2016 election where Russians attempted to influence the election through Social Media accounts, fake news, Information etc. Multiple agencies have confirmed Russia's attempted interference.
Can you prove the flat-earth believers that the Earth is ROUND???
What does disputing the authenticity of the Apollo landings have to do with people who (completely wrongly) believe The Earth is flat?
paulanderson79 no, he's asking if adam could debunk that in a future video
+ Harry the cat - We can wait and watch with amusement.
paulanderson79 yeah
Look, if you took a sample of 1000 people from Bronze Age Greece or Medieval Europe, a lower number of them would believe the world is flat, than would if you took the same sample today. You will never convince people who don't WANT to be convinced. Pride in ignorance and denial of intellectualism and science has almost become a mark of status in America and Europe today. I can only hope the cancer doesn't spread further.
😂 “We’ll get you back in 2016”
Best line in the video 😂
No your wrong is faek because the moon is made of cheese and the fire from the rokcet wood melt the cheese
i kno rite adam such lier
BUT FIRE FROM JET BEAMS CANNOT MELT- wait...
Michal Horanský this comment made my day
Facts
DANK MEMES MELT STEEL BEAMS.... Wrong conspiracy. My bad.
The only fake thing in this video is that guy eating vegemite by the spoonful
Chelsea Mae damn right
🤣🤣
Made me cringe just imagining it.
I like Vegemite, and I spread it thicker than most. But I will not have it right from the the jar
My friends mum eats it straight from the jar, i wouldnt call it fake, just highly unusual.
It turns out, the moon landing was staged by Stanley Kubrick. But Stanley was a perfectionist, so he wanted to film on location
oh so he was the 3rd guy no one remembers seriously everyone remembers buzz and neil but not the pilot ya know the guy who got them there and back safely
It was actually originally going to be staged by John Waters, but NASA was worried the musical numbers and drag costumes would give it away
And he put in lots of hidden imagery and symbolism in the shots for film analysts to drool over for decades to come.
I've seen this same comment literally hundreds of time.
@@grockman2795 but I think the coca cola bottle the Australians saw was a mistake
As if Stanley Kubrick, one of the most government-critical artists making film, wouldn't have immediately told the world about a massive government conspiracy
Or even left the UK at the time. After he moved there in 1962, he never left the country. Ever.
"Adam the moon, ruins landing"
Nice job ruining the landing, Adam the moon!
Ch33z3mann what
While I would defend this and say you should distinguish between fonts before lines, as a graphic designer the rule is to use as few fonts as possible and DEFINITELY not rely on a difference between them for a piece to be legible
Simon Vercoe You must be fun at parties, huh?
Ch33z3mann ha I get it
Adam moons everything!
Not to mention the slow motion camera wasn't there either. Theres no way we could have got that frame rate for that length of time to simulate the feeling of "weightlessness".
Max Von Britannia I’m not saying I believe or disbelieve anything but could have been underwater
I'm pretty sure the argument is that they used wires.
jason R if it was shot underwater you’d see air bubbles
osmosis453 yeah lol I know I’m just coming up with shit
Max Von Britannia slow motion isn't required for the effect of weightlessness.
When someone tries to tell you about a conspiracy theory like the Moon landing being faked, just make them shut up by replying with an even more absurd conspiracy: "you still believe in the moon?? Pfffft"
PatrioticCommando hahahahaha
THE MOON'S A HOLIGRAM!! There are people who actually believe this.
great stolen meme
also, you would need to be able to decrease the gravity in your studio by about 1/6th to make it believable that you can jump so high with so little effort. as computer graphics was not developed enough for that
The moon hoaxers are like "BLA BLA I AM NOT LISTENING"
Odetuber im listening. Tho i do believe it is real but saying they couldnt fake it is just ridicoulous.....
It's not ridiculous. Watch the video again.
107598 it is not impossible, but with the effort needed to fake it, it will be easier to just land on the moon.
Kwan Teik Khow wtf
The Blue Blur wat
Conspiracy theorists, explain this! If we didn't go to the moon how did Ms.Frizzle and her students get there? How did Wallace and Gromit get their cheese from the moon? Get dunked on.
lol
Wobbie GENIUS!
Pfft... You believe in the Moon?...
Cause they are cartoons
Race Animates You don't say........
The moon landing was staged, but kubrick was so insistant, that it had to filmed on location, so they had to go to the moon anyway.
Pfft... you believe in the Moon?...
way to copy the 20 other people commenting the exact same thing.. I know there is no way this many people thought of the same thing. bunch of fucking copy cat sheep.
lol Yes I’m gonna use this!
Best conspiracy theory I've ever heard
They went to london and shot the entire film. Search google for kissingers confessions
The attitude of three astronauts in the press conference is proof enough for me.
The faces of those astronauts tell another story.
The moon landing was, in fact, filmed by Stanley Kubrick. On the moon. They proposed doing it at the studio, but Kubrick, being Kubrick, decided that the only way to get it right would be to actually go to the moon.
This.... this is a joke right...?
No, of course it isn't, he was really persistent In getting to actually look like they were on the moon. So of course what any man would do, he went to the moon and set up a studio there. It's not hard to grasp
He also made Neil to re-do the first step on the moon over 100 times.
Kevin Rooney No no no, don't you get it, they filmed it on Mars, so they wouldn't have to fake low gravity.
Joshua Cooper your so close but they actually filmed it on the sun to give of a more space vibe because nothing is more space then a flaming ball of gas
"Forget it lady. It'd be easier to put a man on the moon."
You got over one hundred likes for quoting a piece of dialogue in the video. YT comments suck.
@@Elektrokardiogramm no u
@@Elektrokardiogramm no you times two
@@leahjimenez6979 Oof
@@Elektrokardiogramm oofty oof
Adam,you are amazing.
Ruin the flat earthers next!!!
Who wouls even waste time on that
@@elenemtskhvetadze6162 College humor
You just copied the idea
to @@jaspergabrellsalomon2598 yes, yes he did
Vsauce did it
the worst part is if you link this video to a flat earther they’ll just say ‘you need someone else to do the research for you’