Was the Moon Landing faked? | Neil deGrasse Tyson | Big Questions
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 มิ.ย. 2024
- Neil deGrasse Tyson joined us to answer our biggest questions on climate change, God, AI and more. Order your copy of Letters from an Astrophysicist now: amzn.to/3EDr1De
Neil deGrasse Tyson is arguably the most influential, acclaimed scientist on the planet. As director of the Hayden Planetarium, and host of Cosmos and StarTalk, he has dedicated his life to exploring and explaining the mysteries of the universe.
Every year, he receives thousands of letters - from students to prisoners, scientists to priests. Some seek advice, others yearn for inspiration; some are full of despair, others burst with wonder. But they are all searching for understanding, meaning and truth.
His replies are by turns wise, funny, and mind-blowing. In this, his most personal book by far, he covers everything from God to the history of science, from aliens to death. He bares his soul - his passions, his doubts, his hopes. The big theme is everywhere in these pages: what is our place in the universe?
The result is an awe-inspiring read and an intimate portal into an incredible mind, which reveals the power of the universe to start conversations and inspire curiosity in all of us.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to the Penguin channel:
po.st/SubscribePenguinTH-cam
Follow us here:
Twitter | / penguinukbooks
Website | www.penguin.co.uk
Instagram | / penguinukbooks
Facebook | / penguinbooks - บันเทิง
NASA hired Stanley Kubrick to fake the moon landing, but he is such a perfectionist that he insisted on shooting it on location.
He left clues in the shining,unless he was just screwing with people.
yes poor Kubrick die after that .
Stealing other people's comment from Kubrick based videos
Robert Scott
Hahhahahahaha ! Nice one.
@Russ Gee We can also rebuild a Model T Ford. Would you want to drive one at 45 mph or less?
It was faked. It was filmed on Mars.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
It was filmed, but it was here on Earth. Stanley Kubrick’s admission shortly before his death.
th-cam.com/video/VbuSx-0YtSI/w-d-xo.html
@@Comedy-Cult Not only is that not Kubrik. That guy seems out of his rocker.
@@Comedy-Cult not even Kubrick 😂
Lmaoo
You’d think the USSR would show the rest of the world how we faked it. Instead, they said “damn, they beat us!”
Yep! Moreover, they tracked, confirmed, and congratulated NASA on the achievements.
@@DemonDrummerand afterwards, both sides resumed the nuclear arms race, because, you know, dick measuring contests are more important.
@@MisterMcKinney Sadly, that they did.
True bill, and the USSR were as crooked as the sickle and as ruthless as the hammer that crossed it lol
Yes because they wanted to claim that they done so as well you idiot🤦♂️
"There are almost 5,000 Gods being worshipped by humanity. But don't worry, only yours is right."
Yep! And let’s not forget, the followers for all those gods have the same exact excuses and “evidence” to prove their gods’ existence.
I would follow the God who the entire worlds calendar is based off of Jesus Christ
@@TheDirtymikenation You didn’t get the quote’s meaning…
maturity is when u realize that all those different Gods with different names worshipped by different people is actually the same entity.
The same God is known by different names to different peoples
@@Sumit_Sinha347 Actual maturity is when you realize all those thousands of gods have the same evidence to substantiate their existence as any other; none.
"If you have the power of geoengineering to turn Mars into Earth, then you have the power of geoengineering to turn Earth back into Earth"👏👏
But i don't think they follow the same process because of their distinct composition.
@@subhasdh2446 I think the point is that if you have the resources, the money, and the technology to create something that can transform Mars into to Earth, then you should've used it instead to create something that can turn Earth Back into to earth.
I don’t think so.... cause other giant corporations will get in your way.....
That’s such a stupid statement. It’s false.
Kasu are you suggesting that nobody’s currently doing it?
"If we have the power for geo engineering Mars, then we have the power to geo engineer the Earth back into Earth"
Love it.
There are only few quotes that can qualify as quotes of the millennium and this is undoubtedly one such.
phenomenal
Earth would still be overpopulated, and at some point we will still need to head out. Or slow down heavily on the reproducing.
Djara Colman that's true but this comment and vid was talking about moving the entire population
Exactly what Ive said before.
If this dude was my schience teacher back in school, I would be a f-ing astronaut by now. This guy knows how to explain, tell and teach. Love this guy!!
he didn't touch on a single anomaly about the moon landing, because if he did, he wouldn't be able to explain it, so instead he goes for this ridiculous cop-out, its a joke
You need an English teacher not a science teacher… na only messing god bless
@@scabbage1520 How is it ridiculous???? That is the problem with you moon conspiracy proponents, logic is lost on you
@@GammaSouljahdon’t argue it’s the dunning Krueger effect. He thinks he knows more than Neil who dedicated his life to this while he has no qualifications..
Yes he’s a great bullshit artist !!!
“It's Easier to Fool People Than It Is to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled.” - Mark Twain
Yes. This applies so strongly to Apollo deniers. They’ve watched American Moon, or A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon or whatever, and they have been fooled by it, and there is no reasoning with them.
Well said!
@@paulbeardsley4095 James Bond exposed the firmament and the fake Moon landing back in 1971 th-cam.com/video/W_-ZwA-ZBcE/w-d-xo.html
the moon landing happened 100%. it was broadcasted on tv, live, during the cold war. there were absolutely no reason why it would of have been made up or why it would fail. the technology was super advanced back then, they could of have gone to mars if they wanted. nowadays its impossible though, we dont have that level of super technology anymore
It’s sad
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain
i like the irony of how all the conspiracytards quote that, btw there's no evidence that Mark Twain actually wrote this phrase
And by that I asume you mean, it's easier telling people that we didn't go to the moon that to convince those nutheads, that we actually went to the moon.
@@iphoneconpolenta541 how is the pasture doing?.
I've used that quote to describe how Trump got elected, and continues to have supporters.
@Laurence Davighi ha ha sharing your opinion...as if it means anything...LOL
It's not a question of did a rocket go up, it's a question of did it really go to the moon and more so did we get to see footage of whatever they saw whether they went to the moon or wherever? Did the footage get destroyed? Some said there were documentaries or videos where they filmed a fictional retelling of the moon landing. So, it is a question of did we see the actual footage of the moon or did we only see the fictional retelling of the alleged landing. It's possible people went to the moon. It's also possible the general public were given staged videos. Perhaps some people did not want us to see the actual footage of the moon landing assuming people went there.
*Going down the proverbial 'Rabbit Hole' of Conspiratorial Thinking*
One of the important characteristics of conspiracy theories such as the SIX Apollo Moon Missions were faked, is that they are immune to real evidence. All evidence is interpreted to support the conspiracy. Correct evidence is hidden. Contradictory evidence is planted. And faced with evidence that might disprove the conspiracy, believers move the 'goal posts' and make excuses. This is often seen in the tactic of the 'Gish Gallop'. Example. Changing the subject of discussion.
*Generally there's a double standard for evidence. Official sources can't be trusted. But a random nobody guy on You Tube, or a podcast knows the truth* And often the evidence is simply perceived motivations and the vague notion that something must be wrong.
If you care about what really is truth, it's important to protect our beliefs from falsification. If a belief is true, it will withstand scrutiny. So scrutinise them. Importantly, there are real conspiracies, but finding them requires critical thinking and evidence. Not conspiratorial thinking.
The bottom line is, Critical Thinking is empowering. But conspiratorial thinking is anything but. So it's best to avoid the proverbial 'Rabbit Hole' of delusions.
What's the point of this? Unless there is some evidence that throws the moon landings into doubt, you are wasting your time.
No man has set foot on the moon. AMERICAN MOON documentary is a must watch... on YT free.
If we went to the moon, which we didn't, then it would be as obvious as the dawn and the sunset. There is absolutely no proof that this event ever occurred. I could go on. The people who have highjacked your mind through mandate, legislation, bought media and implied force, have MADE you to believe in a God that does not exist. Keep believing, see where it gets you. There are rocket stages lying in the bottom of the ocean that you are forbidden to investigate, near the impenetrable depths of Antarctica. Realize that God does exist. Not in the way you are trained to believe, but in a way that you may finally rise to understanding of WHAT IS. Religion, as we are trained to believe, is just another money motivated force that seeks to distract us from WHAT IS. Truth works. It works despite belief. As belief is based upon unfounded "understanding". Go ahead and buy the bill of goods that you pay your tax dollars to sustain. Keep paying, and you you will get exactly what you paid for: LIES, DISTRACTION AND UNWORKABILITY. Knock yourself out!
p
There is a laser reflecting mirror placed there for measuring the Earth-moon distance. They fire a laser and do just that twice a day.
What more proof do you want?
That is the best point ive heard anybody say is if we can teraform mars ...why the hell cant we just reapair our earth back to where its normal again , the problem is that we can repair the damage we have done , but we would all have to work together and there would have to be a whole lot of sacrifice on many peoples part, and i dont think this world is selfless enough for everybody to work together and fix our problems. We are to dependent on all the technology that is ruining our earth and thats the major problem , breaking away from these advancements that we all love and think we need to survive .
A very good point. I would just add that greed is a powerful drug. In order to fix the Earth, a lot of very rich people would have to give up their revenue streams.
Starting with the billionaires.
Because it's not profitable to do so , the World is ruled by Money !! And always will be , their called " Globalists " & we are pee ons !!!
The way to terraform Mars is with large thermal detonations at the poles... you can see why we don't do that here. Go research terraforming methods first. You'll see extremely obviously why it doesn't work on a populated planet.
As we see these days, you can invest and be green earth as big as you want , other countries are going to do other things. Sure they will say one thing and do another.
"If you have the power to bio engineer mars, than you got the power to bio engineer the earth” that’s deep
* Geo Engineering.
But I don't think that's right... Mars allows failures in the process. Earth doesn't.
I think the ultimate reason of being multiplanetarey or travelling to mars is the human curiosity to discover beyond our world,in other words its really fun
@@AshleyWilsonAU XD oops, I think I just blew up Hong kong so maybe this isn't such a good idea.
It's true, but it might still be a good idea to make a test run on Mars to make sure we get the technology right before we do it on Earth.
I loved that line.
Imagine saying something so profound that this guy even says “Ooo that’s deep.”
That is the definition of a wet dream.
@@xxgoodboy1499 wow 😂
@@abdullahfahmimagnifico i'll take that as a compliment.
@@xxgoodboy1499 bruh c'mon
He DOES actually concede to "let's keep looking" when it comes to the unknown & someone asks the right questions or someone makes the right statements that are STILL open to conjecture.
On every subject.
Basically.
I was one of approximately 400,000 people who worked on the project! I was but 19 years old and making the performance calculations of the SE8 Apollo space rocket engine that steered the Apollo capsule on its course. These small Rockets were most instrumental in saving Apollo 13 on its guidance safely back to Earth entry. Ask Jim Lovell… I’m met him ! CG
I know a guy who worked on one of the recent King Kong movies, but even he's smart enough to know that King Kong isn't real, LOL.
@@scoobtube5746 🫵🏻parisyte
@@scoobtube5746 aka stusue ◁=== And *WHAM !* This HOAXTARD has been *SMACKED DOWN* yet again. LOL 🤣
@@scoobtube5746 What if he said the King Kong movie didn't exist even though he worked on it? 😁
typos…. I’ve met Jim Lovell and heard his first hand experience of Apollo 13 ! A really engaging Man! CG
If we didn't go to the moon the Russians would have said not we were watching the entire time! 💕
Dude finally I’ve been telling people to start thinking about it. If we never went to the moon the when russia and China and the other 20 countries that have been there would have said there is no flag or plaques
And we all know they wouldn't lie. Words don't prove things, evidence does, and we don't have reliable evidence. What we do have is a space cult that shuns or ridicules non-believers, which they call deniers and conspiracy theorists (heretics).
What people watched on TV was not a livestream but a film.
@@dharmaqueen7877 You are incorrect. We have overwhelming evidence that proves humans walked on the Moon. Try again?
Do better, learn.
@@dharmaqueen7877 Proof humans have walked on the Moon:
1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked.
2. There are thousands of hours of video too.
3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon.
4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth.
5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions.
6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base.
7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base.
8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits.
9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon.
10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco
11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that.
12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing.
13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud.
14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports).
15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government.
16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm
17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks.
18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon.
19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon.
20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile.
21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic).
22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit.
23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
Do better, learn.
"Turn Earth back into Earth" may be the most underrated statement, maybe *EVER*
Its not
Mars can be transformed into a earth like planet with polution and some other things, mars is cold as fuck but earth is about to get to hot so there is no way to change that
Search:
Neil deGrasse Tyson meets Post Malone
It’s hilarious!
@@jason54770 i can guarantee u it's not going to
Mmm
A.I. This is why I always say "Thank you," to the ATM when I withdrawal cash....they remember.
i tell my toaster hi every day
🤣😏🤣😭
I say "good day sir" to my dry cleaner for drying my skids
I always tell my alexa thank you after she does something right
@@austinhelton1847 I do as well, and same to the Google Assistant. Though not necessarily because I think they'll take over the world (at least not in my lifetime), but because they'll grow smart enough to comprehend the differences between general kindness and bigotry. General Artificial Intelligence and machine learning.
And when that time comes, I want it to be known that I welcome them as equals, and that I mean no harm and would love to learn more from them.
With all the pointless madness going on these days I find reason and rational thinking very comforting, there's beauty in understanding the order of things.
uuuu I like the music on this one , who ever did it good job man
"if you have the geoengineering power to turn mars into earth, then you have that same power to turn earth back into earth"
Very good point
No One chills
It is you fool what made the Frisian people leave the coast in the 100-300 AD only to go back after 400 AD was it Romans driving SUV's or natural cycles?
Hmm.....if you have the power to move granite slabs of 10 to 3000 tonnes with apparent anti gravity ease....when building the Pyramids and Sarcophagi...then upgrading it to other structures.......could be a doddle! Why not?
*Elon Musk has left the chat*
Don't get me wrong, i still think that terraforming mars is a good idea
came her to see if the moon landing was real. ended up getting a 6 minute lecture on god
you poor thing.What did the police say?
@reign
That's what I thought. I was expecting a video on the moon landing not all the other stupid questions.
@@richardarkwright1224 I think that you are missing the point here. I hate such clickbait titles. Don't you?
@@p.s6742 No, to be honest. It want that long ago these professional, free videos were not widely available. Id feel like a spoiled, entitled moron if I were to complain that that the mastermind Im watching goes off topic here and there. Im assuming the video is titled as such because its the first thing he spoke about. It never fails to amaze me how people get angry or even slightly pissed off that the video that cost the producers money was not tailored for that individual.
yep
*A FUNNY THING HAPPENED* WHEN NASA SENT NINE APOLLO MISSIONS OUT TO THE MOON Six of those missions went down with a two man crew to the Lunar surface Those were Apollos 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 Now how about that !😎
3:10 the problem is it will be easier to fix or clean an empty house rather than having people in it. I think that's why terraforming mars sounds easier than terraforming earth.
Bahahahahahahahah
You can't terraform earth without someone noticing
That is the problem of using logic. House is not planet so corrupted analogy
Ohh that last bit was kinda Terminator-ish..
Then you have the geoengineering to turn earth back into earth.
That is genius
xc5647321 xc5647321 um what
I wouldn’t say genius. Just common sense.
Within your context, "ingenious" might have been the more accurate term. With that now clarified, I ask you: Is it ingenious to conclude the Earth is no longer Earth?
What how? Lmaaooo this kids inspired by Neil Tyson omg the cringe 😭😭
@@1Morpheus cringe? Explain
“It’s easier to fool someone than to convince them that they’ve been fooled”
Too true. That's why conspiracy theorists are like cultists: once they've been convinced that they're "awake" and "know the truth", it's nearly impossible to bring them back to reality, no matter how many times their leaders are caught lying and their evidence has been proven to be wrong or even outright fabricated.
@@kevinskinner4986 Wow, that went right over your head!
@@magnus4346 I think it went over yours. I'm well aware that most of the people saying that are conspiracy theorists going "Ha ha, you're all brainwashed and won't believe it." My point is that most of the time, it describes themselves. It's called "irony".
Here's another Twain quote to ponder. "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story."
@@kevinskinner4986 if you a Sunday Christian stop it, you all are under strong delusion
Kevin Skinner Could not have said it better, All the retards think they are right when in reality, they are just idiots that like to think the opposite just because the government said one way, and oh lord the government lies about everything.... Well Actually, no, theres a thing called science and history records, where such things are obligated to publicly release to the press, The woke ones are the people who actually read and educate themselves based on what theyve learned, which is fine because thats the truth. Could not have said it better, Its Ironic, It reminds me of trump supporters
How did they know what equipments were needed into the space🤔😆
well they went to space first and came back ?
Bro I hear people ask questions like this all the time and it makes me really fear that people
Don’t believe thing because they truly understand anything. No we just built a rocket a took a big guess. Good luuuccckkk
Holy shit we sent unmanned ships monkey manned ship we did test we used science because it’s real and it works
Re: the last segment:
All hail The Basilisk!
Forget the moon landing, we still have Americans think that the Earth is flat
@Boxing 101 so your logic is: if all the balls on the pool table are round, that means that the pool table also must be round. right?? lol
@@Qodesheem WTF!?!? get a hobby.😁
@@Qodesheem No. Actually, your interpretation led me to think of the balls as celestial bodies and the table as spacetime itself rather than another celestial body. And yes, celestial bodies are round (balls) and spacetime geometry is pure flatness (table). Of course the latter can be distorted to not me flat, but that's another topic.
@@Qodesheem no, but everything in its original form is spherical (atoms, molecules, cells), it would then beg the arguement that earth would be as well.
@@jamey7003 there is no curvature of the earth..
1969: We put a man on the moon. 2023: We can't agree what a man is.
😂😂😂 so true how can people disagree
Actually we can't define what a woman is. But as soon as you mention "wage gap" then the women are suddenly identified.
I gotta steal this!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@danielg6566 underrated comment.
@@danielg6566 Best comment!
1:31 wise words
*A FUNNY THING HAPPENED* WHEN NASA SENT NINE APOLLO MISSIONS OUT TO THE MOON Six of those missions went down with a two man crew to the Lunar surface Those were Apollos 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 Now how about that !
The problem with Man is that he doesn't learn from history.
Josh there are a few of us that do and you seem to be one of us But every generation thinks they need to disprove the older generation to make them feel relevant .
Thanks, Sonic!
@@josephdietz3446 yeah we just have to not be idiots and that's all we need to accomplish.
@@chickenflavor9880 yes you understand that the people before us learned so much during their time why would we suppress it The IQ factor hasn't been on an upward trend mankind is as smart right now as he was 200 years ago . I think some of this is from the every participant gets a trophy just for playing coddling that some parents adopt about their children then try to live a 2nd life through the child not letting them have the choice of life . Nice talking to you Josh
That’s pretty insightful for a blue hedgehog...
When he said if we can turn mars into earth we are capable of turning earth back into earth i was like GaMeChAnGeR
The difference would be there's nothing on mars fighting against the efforts. We COULD change earth, but it would require ALL or at least the majority to be on board.
I loved this as well! We think we are so powerful and so important... it’s like... in comparison to the planet, we are smaller than ants. We are probably the earths germs. Lol good catch!
No one's sure we have the power to do one so who's to say we can do the other :p and good luck getting countries like China, India or Mexico to become eco friendly. Many things are possible but I think change will have to be forced upon us, like a drug addict hitting rock bottom.
Makes sense..perhaps whatever terraform other planets is just doing the same here ,so we know it takes time to do this process howling who knows but I can say this we are f word! We cant stop it .
How about aliens living underground of mars
Love Dr. Degrasse Tyson! Genius
How trippy is it that lady liberty’s torch would still be sticking up and out even if all the ice melted.
Edit: left elbow* is the one holding the declaration, not the torch. So half the body would be out still
Left elbow is about 100 mtrs up from ground level, thats a fuckton of water dude. Dayum
Correction : 44mtrs. The entire statue is about 93mtr
Let's turn Earth back into Earth. And while we are at it can we be kinder to one another.
"can we be kinder to one another ?"
You're asking a bit too much there, buddy.
@@tomsriver2838 delete twitter first and maybe
Toms River was about to comment the same. Turning Earth back into Earth is possible but being kind to one another nope. I almost got knocked out by a woman because of toilet paper.
Yeah, the united states was built on hatred. And yet it's the #1 county in the world 🤔 (slaves)
Mason Ulrich I'm aware of America's history but the lady that tried to uppercut me Tyson style was German, I'm from there. Btw: I think Denmark, Iceland and New Zealand are the top 3 countries in the world. America ist the most entertaining
If we think of the universe as everything already contained within our minds, then we already know what is there in the first place, don’t we?❤❤❤❤
The coin flip thing isn't going to get someone to flip heads 10 times in a row 100% of the time
came here for the " forget the moon landing, we still have people who..." comments
Same
Eduard Ritok ... Thanks, I wrote the first one a month ago and for some reason it became a thing... by the way, the statement I wrote that 15% of Americans think chocolate milk comes from brown cows is true, and not a joke...
@@yamman4482 Yeah, you're the top comment, mate
Can someone tell me please is the moon landing was really faked
r explore i dont think so we would have the technology for that and even when it was fake why would the government hide the truth? I wouldnt fucking care if they made it or not! But in space there are even lifestreams from the ISS
I wonder if when Neil DeGrasse Tyson was a kid he said "when I grow up I want to be the spokesperson for Science"
Carl Sagan i believe was one of his inspirations
@@adarsh7914 And if I can remember well, as heard on some podcast, he actually met him...
@@matshu I thought he actually, like, mentored him.
That's exactly what he is.
Will Fishing th-cam.com/video/bGRXR85c1SQ/w-d-xo.html
It's not easier to go to the moon if they didn't have the technology at that time.
Well they certainly didn’t have the technology to fake it at the time.
MODERN AGE OF 60s/70s
It's quite obvious you didn't even exist back in the 60s and 70s. It was in fact a very modern day and age. A time of great innovation and scientific discoveries. Yes, we didn't have personal computers and 'smart' phones. But we did have the Boeing 707 Airliner and the successful development of the Concord Supersonic Airliner. The 747 Jumbo commercial jet was just been built, n and the last one has just been rolled off the assembly line. The fastest jet aircraft ever built was the Blackbird SR-71 Reconnaissance Military plane. It's record of 2000 mph (Mac 3.2) plus and altitude of 85.000 ft has never been beaten, other than the Rocket Planes as follows. There were several of those manned Rocket Planes that actually went faster. The X-15 was one of those. It set a record for speed (4.520 mph/Mac 6.7) and an altitude record of 102,100 ft. It was designed to be dropped launched from beneath a B-52 . And that was just the advances in Aeronautics. Then there are the two Pioneer Deep Space probes which are now well beyond the outer limits of the Solar System. That smart phone in your hand, and your personal computer had their beginnings back in that time. It was indeed a very modern technological world. 😎
They did though.
Fascinating to see him not really understand how general AI is fundamentally different from the specific tasking that computers have taken over.
There are a number of YT videos that explain why there really is no such thing as true Artificial Intelligence. It's really SI (Simulated Intelligence)
Yeah. I don’t think it’s nearly as advanced as “they” proclaim it is. Don’t get me wrong it is literally astronomically more advanced than it was 50yrs ago. However, that is combined with the advance of design and data input. I personally think, at least to a certain degree, it’s great marketing by the tech industry.
"An I said, oooh, that's deep"
-Neil deGrasse Tyson, 20xx
I live in Thailand. I asked my Thai wife if Thais believed America went to the moon. She said Thais don't think about that. She said Thais think about what's for breakfast tomorrow.
That's why Thais never went to the moon.
@@Devolgane4 Nor did we.
I feel kinda bad for you bro
Fuck the Moon where can I get me a Thai woman that cooks breakfast?
@@slickric2176 In Thailand. I get my omelets, American breakfasts, french toast.. and pancakes. The trick about finding a good woman in Thailand is don't choose the woman choose the family.
Epa ...eu sou portuguesa...e considero este homem um espetáculo. Mas Lisboa nao desapareceu...alias td mundo agora vem para Portugal...pais maravilha
tambem sempre gostei deste tipo, fiquei admirado por ver alguem a falar daquele tremor de terra que matou cerca de 100 000 pessoas, Lisboa ardeu dia e noite durante 5 dias.
A comment that a robot could have put the laser reflector there is not possible. The instrument had to be set up and placed gently on the surface since there are sensitive optics. A robot that sophisticated to send into space was not possible then. Only humans could have set it up th-cam.com/video/iwxrNurAuu8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HQMv_oo10ygaQmHW
laser beam can be reflected by moon surface.
@@32hotmale Not accurately to the source. Take any laser point it directly at a mirror and it will reflect back to your body. Point it at a wall, even a white one and most of the beam is absorbed
"Life may perish, but the earth will take care of itself."
cool no more bills to pay
Not after 5 billion years from now
@@fayasamd5204 more like 2-3 billion, since the Sun will expand and consume the rocky planets (mars might survive, but even then it might be vaporised due to proximity to the Sun's surface)
the plus side to the Sun's red giant phase is that Jupiter and Saturn's moons might warm up enough to get life cooking, hopefully some humanoid Earth scientists are stationed there to observe the new era of our solar system
You think that your scientists are teaching you everything, they teach you that there is infinite universe that have no begening and no end and yet at the same time deny that a creator (God) who is litteraly everlasting has no begening and no end, they have become foolish to deny God but I think that we all will see him one day, either he is happy with us or he is really angry but I want you to know that there is no way to God but by Jesus christ only and you can't have everlasting life without Jesus.
@@user-vi4oj4de7q "what if we pick the wrong religion? Every week we’re just making God madder and madder"
3000 religions to choose from.
"...and I said, _'Ooh, that's deep.'_"
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
FKalo Hey quote mining is MY job! Lol. With that being said, nicely done 🍻
...and she said, _'No it's not, you're just inadequate.' _" -Alice Young
Brilliant, savvy, and balanced of Neil!
My Next doors, neighbor Brother was a Nasa Engineer, and designed the Computer,s on the Lem. And luner Rover. And helped, Apolo 13 get back to earth 🌎
I’ve watched this guy so much that I could’ve answered all these questions in his words.
Kickex We cannot go to the moon and here is proof:
th-cam.com/video/l-KI-2e0_NQ/w-d-xo.html.
So it is easier to go to the moon then to make the video yet we have the video and they cannot go to the moon. So their excuses they do not want to go to the moon while they spend all of the money and resources the world has to offer trying, but they don’t want to? So all of the worlds nations could go to the moon, but they don’t want to because America did it and has a video? Is that really the stance of all the boomers and the boomers children?
Let me know when you were all denying GSI and the worlds leading particle physicist as well as all of space bearing nations fact that show we cannot leave the thermosphere and that ionizing radiation is why. Good luck denying climate change just like you deny the Moonlanding you stupid nationalist zealots.
@@joemaddoxrx7 yup you're 100% right👏 now go back to smoking that crackpipe
Tomi D The only crackhead here is the one denying science and that is you. They cannot go to the moon but they can fake a moon landing. If I was wrong we would be on the moon. We cannot go to the moon no matter what excuse you come up for it’s impossible.
@@joemaddoxrx7 way to be a sheeple. There's footprints and the flags, but most importantly, they placed a reflector on the surface, which if you shine a lazer on it it'll reflect said light back. Thus, proving we've been there, i.e. manmade objects there. I probably worded that a little incorrectly, but it doesn't matter. It's okay to be skeptical, that's why evidence exist. Due diligence and thinking for yourself are important. Also, stay off the crack pipe. Thank you, have a good day.
midoribishi No there are not, because GSI has proven Apollo never left the thermosphere. You cannot sign a laser on a mirror that is not there. Apollo only went 230 miles up. Only denial of science and your cognitive dissonance is why you believe we went to the moon.
You know why Neil deGrasse Tyson is such a popular smart person? He knows how to explain things to the general public....and it makes sense. WITHOUT grandstanding.
I would love to have him over for a weekend. No TV, internet just intelligent conversation.
What's grandstanding? Sorry I'm stupid
Alex Myladoor Never a stupid question. Just people stupid enough to let their egos or other people’s judgment stop them from asking. Grandstanding means trying to impress people through what you’re saying or doing. In this case it would mean some smart person using unnecessarily big words to explain something, or complicating a topic for no reason. Neil just speaks and explains things as understandably as he can.
i think its beccause he is black. LOL
@@marcuseriksson3732 If you're kidding, ok. If not, that's moronic.
Imagine. Everyone is scared of AI. What if AI is the thing to give us that futuristic world everyone thought today would be? Food for thought.
I was surprised when landing on the Moon was questioned like I was surprised contemporary people argued the earth is flat. This came from a person who had persuaded me there they were advanced human civilizations over 12,000 years. I still believe in the evidence of ancient human civilizations, just not in the people who doubt contemporary Man didn't get to the Moon.
Modern homosapiens evolved over 100 hundred thousand years ago and were more advanced than we thought
The entire comment section on this video is trying to sound like Neil
I found that when You make sense on social media...
No one responds🤔
*When You fake Who You are... You get likes & responses😱
732RECCS I don’t understand honestly..I’m just summarizing what I’ve seen in a few comments on this video I’m not trying to get likes or responses I don’t care about those. I’m just saying what I see
That’s a good way to handle jealousy. You try to get to he’s level in stead of bringing him to your.
@@raintaken7610 That mindset is... THE--'I'm afraid to use My brain cause I might get slandered on the internet for being weak'--/afraid to openly get ridiculed for having a DIFFERENT opinion, mentality😕
=
People are afraid to be Themselves nowadays🤔
732RECCS. It’s not that I am afraid. My point was that I like and respect this man so in stead of talking shit about him and try too seem better than him. I’ll rather learn from he’s words and try to be more like him in stead of just trashing him just to make my self feel better about my self Bc of jealousy and envy.
Isn’t there a 25% chance that the last 2 coin tosses would both come up tails?
I heard that within 5-10 years it’ll be common we go to the moon.
I will look sooo forward to that day they find the remainings of the apollo missions.
I will laugh so loud, so all of the denying conspiracy theorists can hear it.
I can’t wait 😊😊
They been saying this for the last 15-20 years… if we did go which is highly unlikely we definitely not going back anytime soon sorry to break the news
Imagine having a beer with this dude
just don't buy shots of tequila
What's a beer going to do?
Or a joint
Naah whiskey is better he will start spiting physics itself
@@micahkiker3041 for some people it will help on having a much better time.
I really liked the coin flip illustration.
Me too. I've heard it before, but never framed in a psychological sense. Makes you think that there have likely been LOTS of lottery winners who prayed to God beforehand that they win, and lo and behold - God granted them a miracle.
And nobody interviews the 2 million people whose lottery prayers got ignored :)
Yeah, but there is a catch...
The catch being there is a plausible possibility that when a small group of people are still standing they all throw a tail.
Granted, the average would be 50/50 for heads and tails. But a small sample size is not reliable. That is why we always (should) use large sample sizes. If and when we want to conclude something scientifically meaningful.
@@wimahlers
Well he did qualify that, when he wrapped it up with "And every time you do this experiment - basically - you get one person left standing".
But I get what you mean. And there's as much a chance of two left standing at the end with heads as both the "finalists" flipping tails and sitting down. :)
exAMEN🌈FIRM'amen'T,
☝️👀 The rocket always follows the curvature of the firmament.
Dr.🌏ip
👀☔
Psalm 118:8 It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
anD The sun needs oxygen to breathe in space space men. My brothers and sisters are going to figure it out.
HeavenO hellO
@@rainbowrocket3981 ?????
Myopic view of good. What about good as being the well being of the whole. We are mere organisms playing our part within this overall good.
I agree, somewhat, but ultimately “good” and morality is subjective.
not according to the astronauts
2020: *feeling worried*
2067: "Pick that up for me "
A.I. : No
😂😂😂😂
AI I am your master now bitch
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This is why im polite to my phones virtual assistant.
I dont think we ever have to worry about a time that robots gain feelings or tale control, technology is programmed so unless we programme it to do so it is highly unlikely to ever happen.
Dont be surprised to see humans become almost robotic through the advancement of technology though.
billie eillish : "when i cry water comes from my eyes"
14 year olds : 8:57
jesus that comment is just gold
@@thesenate9564 I second that
Science Q&A video: Slinging stuff onto the other bodies
Guy on internet: Slinging shit onto other people
🤔
@@caiheang are you a fan of Billie eilish
@@thesenate9564 she probably is a 14 year old
*THE MOON LANDING DENIERS MINDSET* Denialism is more than just another manifestation of the humdrum intricacies of our deceptions and self-deceptions. In the psychology of human behavior, denialism is a person's choice to deny reality as a way to avoid a psychologically uncomfortable truth. Denialism is an essentially irrational action that withholds the validation of a historical experience or event when a person refuses to accept an empirically verifiable reality. 🔆
@apolloskyfacer5842 You're right, and I see hundreds of your posts on similar videos. Many of your comments date back nearly a decade, so you seem like a dedicated activist on the subject. The truly mind boggling part is how well written your comments are, almost like they've been crafted by a professor of academia. I aspire to articulate myself in this subject with your level of quality and robustness.
I'm interested in knowing more, and was wondering if I could get your suggestions on other videos and reading materials on astronomy and the solar system. I've become more interested in this subject from casually listening to Joe Rogan and other similar podcasts
@@PracticeMan69 Stay away from Joe Rogan. He's a sensationalist and is all over the place. One You Tuber I can recommend for starters is Curious Droid. All his videos are very informative and educational. And the are many others. Also note that NASA have their own You Tube videos including live broadcasts of ongoing events.
@@PracticeMan69 Can confirm, stay away from Joe Rogan…
@@DemonDrummerI'm just trying to converse with ApolloSky... It seems like a bot account that copy pastes tons of comments for decades. He posts extremely long comments daily with no grammar/spelling errors. Scroll down on any related video and you'll find thousands of similar spam comments from ApolloSky for 10+ years.
It seems like AI generated messages or a 24/7 spam bot. Bizarre, got me curious
@@PracticeMan69 Isn't it also plausible that it's not a bot but an actual person who simply copy and pastes things?
I always say they went thru a lot to fake the Moon landing if that was so...My Grandfather worked for Grumman on Long Island he helped build the L.E.M. They made a plate and but everyone's name on it that helped build the L.E.M..So my Grandfather's name is on the moon several times.. Me and my cousin's saw the module in the shop he worked at on Grumman family day and I got to go inside it ..
@@MaNuLaToROfficial Still being cute. A Bot calling others bots. 🤣
@@MaNuLaToROfficial You: *_”Everyone that challenges me on my baseless claims is a bot…obviously…”_* 🤣😉
Do better, learn.
"if we have power to turn Mars into Earth, then let's turn Earth back into Earth"
I love this guy!
they dont want to clean up the mess...they dont want to clean space debrisw or trash we dump into oceans. So its inevitable we will choke ourselves with our own waste
Why not do both?
@@espada8077 I don't see why not!
think this guy was paid to keep silence about moon landing. Even though there is lots of footage of moon landing they won't make it public because they probably faked the landing instead of proudly showing the documentary videos and photos they are keeping most of footage classified because the more footage they show the more the reality will be exposed.if they were really confident in themselves they would have boldly shown the documentary of videos instead of hiding them. The more footage they show the more their faults will be seen .also all old good moon conspiracy videos are being removed and only few trashy videos are kept something fishy is going on
@jon pork I don't know about that . But I do know that NASA said on 2006 that they have no idea where the original tape of Apollo 11 is and the present existing videos of Apollo 11 are edited videos. Also they say they can't remake Apollo 11 and the technology for going to moon is lost. Their excuse is that the engineers have died and it's too expensive. I mean America gave free money of 1.8 billion in charity how hard will it be make a rocket of 1.5 billion
And are you sure NASA can't classify things . I mean many record of Apollo 11 to 13 are missing or lost. Is this coincidence
AI Experts: AI could become dangerous in the future
Also AI Experts: *continue working on the potentially dangerous AI*
I'm not joking 1% here; I guarantee you know not a single human that works on AI (if you do give me a name, I'll match you with cal tech and MIT post grads). In fact I don't even think you know the scientific field which develops AI. So I'm going to help you, The scientific field is known as machine learning. And they utilize advanced mathematic algorithms in what is known as discrete choice. Which is essentially optimization of making the best choices IE ethics in relation to the data set present. Machines don't have feelings They have objective analysis based upon data sets which then drive them to make the most efficient choice based upon the information as it is presented. Essentially they are unbiased humans.
Forrest Outman give me some names from MIT and Tech.
@@jacksji8912 Sommer Gentry Doctorate in Engineering with focus on Machine Learning, professor of mathematics at US Naval Academy Annapolis and Johns Hopkins University, Scout Croft of Cal Tech jet propulsion laboratories, and Kyle Killough NASA engineer... I know each of them personally and there are more I can roll off my tongue. Ok your turn! I bet you thought I was Bullshit, wrong dude to call out. I nerd hard
Forrest Outman. Wow. You can name some engineers. You don’t have to bust a nut over it smh.
And like all I was asking who you knew. I was being curious. Sorry I might have come off as a smart ass, mb.
@@jacksji8912 after seeing this post today, I realize I over reacted to your simple statement that was likey made in jest. In truth A.I. could be a threat to humanity, but in a different way than sci-fi films usually portrait. Automation has replaced some manual labor and semi-skilled workers and that will continue, but likely on a much larger scale. Autonomous vehicles will slowly begin to replace professional drivers. A.I. programs are already beginning to take writing jobs online for sports columns for example. Cashiers are increasingly being replaced etc. A.I. will eventually be able to self replicate through use of 3D printing. For now that's not a threat, but likely in our lifetime it will begin.
Paul is dead, man.
Miss him.
Miss him.
Miss him.
For an intellectual like Neil, the argument that it’s easier to go to the moon than produce fake documents is just wow.
The wow of missing the point.
Nope Wrong. Next
Your inability to understand his point is “just wow.”
Do better, learn.
"if you have the power of Geoengineering to turn mars into earth, then you have the power of Geoengineering to turn Earth, back into Earth.
Probably the best thing I've heard all decade.
Klabron Hames --- Congrats on your optimism, but there is a fatal flaw in the "If you can turn Mars in to Earth, you can turn Earth, back into Earth" theory. Mars is EMPTY. People LIVE on Earth. You can terraform a barren planet, but when you want to make sweeping changes to a planet FULL of people, you have to get ALL the people (governments) on board. Our only obstacle to stop the trashing of the planet is to get ALL the inhabitants on Earth to AGREE, and then, COMPLY. ---- So I don't have high hopes for that.
Plus. We’re good at heating not cooling😎
@@kathleenr4047 If everyone began meditating EVERY day..
The subliminal message here will go over most people's heads unfortunately..
The big word there is "IF". Because we don't.
imagine if one of these days he just said: "yeah sure", to one of these stupid questions.
He's gotta be tired of answering some of these by now. Ffs, if it was asked and answered on film already, just copy paste.
@Alex the fuck? but you're joking right?
Alex ............... lie? ...u just melted my brain cells one by one by that statement
This guy is a very intelligent man
They were not real dinosaurs in Jurassic Park as well.
“We as humans simply have a profound inability to understand statistics and probability.” Truer words were never spoken.
Tainted Fate Actually, there’s a 2.6% probability that truer words have been spoken.
DeusExMamiya it’s a figure of speech mate.
I almost got crazy working as a cashier, trying to explain people what 10% discount is..
78.2% of all statistics are made up on the spot, look it up!
And that's why we're just humans and not gods.
I’m not afraid of artificial intelligence. I’m terrified of natural stupidity!
Natural stupidity is the main ingredient to thinking the Earth is flat & the Moon landings were faked. Oh.. and, and uhm.. Building 7, yeah.
You must be very be very terrified of our government and the current state of our society then
@@brandynkoogler4500 code brown!
@@pforbom1844 don't tell me you're a libtard. You realize the only other time in the history of our country that we were worse off was the civil war? And not by much. And its all thanks to the biden administration because of their complete and total stupidity. You may not like trump because of his policies or because he was loud and obnoxious but the dude is hella smart.
Biden and the democratic party have royally fked our country so much I don't even know where to start. If you're calling me a brown noser. Where's the brown nosing? I simply see it for what it is. America is a sh** show. We are the laughing stock of the world, well maybe not quite as bad as russia losing to Ukraine but its bad.
Exactly, the democrats are more scary than AI.
Imagine you lived from 1050 to 1120....pretty boring right...so everybody here reading and typing, we are blessed to live in these times
Not if you are English, we had one of the biggest events in our history in 1066.
Invasion by Normandis and colonization by Cromwel? Revert if you understand what iam talking about.
In his comment about the moon landing, Dr. Tyson might have mentioned that if, in fact, the landing was faked, the Russians most definitely would have known it and would have exploited it then and there. That would have been like Christmas morning for them.
You’re correct. Instead, the Soviets literally tracked, confirmed, and congratulated NASA on the achievements.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 fake as fuck
He could have just not tried to explain and prove it with reliable evidence that doesn't have to be filtered through NASA.
@@dharmaqueen7877 Proof humans have walked on the Moon:
1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked.
2. There are thousands of hours of video too.
3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon.
4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth.
5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions.
6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base.
7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base.
8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits.
9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon.
10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco
11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that.
12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing.
13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud.
14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports).
15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government.
16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm
17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks.
18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon.
19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon.
20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile.
21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic).
22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit.
23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
Do better, learn.
The concept of “skynet” is the form of A. I. that most alarms me. This is what Tyson was discussing at end of segment where A. I. decides humans are too dangerous to continue living. That’s pretty scary.
yeah it kinda made me think of things differently
I would be more concerned with Wintermute.
We may have no choice but to let AI control humans. This way no corrupt lying phony greedy politician or billionaire control freaks will be able to screw taxpayers.
@@efrainrosso6557 lol
ai won't decide we are dangerous. it will decide we are inefficient.
*I can listen to this guy speak forever*
yes because the deep state knows how to find people that can talk right that's why he's getting paid to spread deceitful information. or do you actually believe we went to the moon or that the Earth is round?
@@xTROLLINGx Yes I do and I know its
True 100% to think otherwise is rediculous
Try his audio book. It's free on TH-cam.
Yes!!!
Exactly
why is all the moon footage in slow motion?
It's not.
Why is the moon footage in Fake motion
@@ciupacabraciupacabra6442 Again. It's not. Learn about things you're so ignorant about.
I know we didn’t go to the moon, because everyone knows the moon is made of cheese, and we would have eaten all that cheese by now!❤❤❤❤
🤣
I want to meet the guy who made Neil say: "Oh that's deep"
You could read his books
Ray Bradbury. Amazing writer
Benjamin Franklin
You want to meet Ray Bradbury? Well, you can If you believe in the afterlife and IF afterlife is real and IF you and Bradbury ends in the same place AND IF both of you remember everything in the theoretical afterlife... Better read his books. Those are awesome.
@@setsunaes what da heck
This Question, one should not ask but must research.
@sebastian Sm geographically yes.
in 1969 it would've been more expensive to fake the moon landing than just going to the moon.
SIX times actually.
Forget the moon some people still think Ben Laden did it.
Good one!😊
Wait i thought his name was Bin Laden not Ben Laden
@@xlegend9143 Ben's his younger better looking richer brother
Bahahahaha shit..yeah I totally forgot I even wrote that comment but yes it's hilarious... Bahahaha 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣❤️
Sounds like a shirt maker in manhattan
Forget the moon landing, we still have people who are offended by Ricky Gervais jokes at the golden globes.
Forget the moon landing, we still have people who think Ricky Gervais is actually funny.
alieighty he sure it XD
@@simeonclark8825 He used to be ok about 15 years ago but most of his jokes are just crap now.
@@alieighty he wasn't being funny, he was telling the truth
@@PEDROKA47_ Yes I've noticed a lot of angry impotent people seem to like him.
Niel knows we cant go to the moon. It's his biggest dream.
But he knows theres no way back
So many assertions about Neil from people who can't even get his name right!
Wonderful!, Thank you!
I’m nice to Alexa so she doesn’t hold anything against me
😄😄
I called Alexa a bitch and she told me "that was not very nice".
@@mont7481 good thing she isnt controlling things in your home! Hi I'm Alexa and here is my demonstration of karma! Hot showers can get too hot!
@@Mk-cl3il 😂lol
@@robertkamenoff3918 or how about my garage door not opening or not being able to shut off alarm...scary thought! 😂😁😊😔😞😭
"Ooh that's deep"
-Neil degrasse tyson
brasto 06 not impressed by this dummy.
That's what she said!!!!
@@robertwalker7010 k
Robert Walker how is NDT a dummy?
Robert Walker Maybe not but the entire scientific community agrees with him. So... do you care about you’re children?
Wait… the proof that we went to the moon is that it is easier to “just go to the moon” than to film it in a studio?
*23 PROOFS THE APOLLO MOON LANDINGS HAPPENED* 1. There is over 18,000 photos available to the public of the moon landing missions. 2. There is thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astrologists and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retro reflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, that can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base and the flags. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched apollo missions all the way to the moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messaged FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports. 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal. *Comment courtesy of DemonDrummer 1018* 😎
@@apolloskyfacer5842 You could add that analysis by physicists of various pieces of Apollo footage has concluded that it was filmed in an environment with no atmospheric resistance and within a gravity field where g = 1.6 m/s2. A perfect example of this is the "Rooster Tail" dust trails kicked up by Apollo 16's John Young during his "Grand Prix" in April 1972. This very situation has been analysed, studied and the published results are easily obtained online. "Ballistic motion of dust in the Lunar Roving Vehicle dust trails", Hsu, Hsiang-Wen, Horányi, Mihály, (University of Colorado), American Journal of Physics, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp. 452-456 (2012). They conclude that the lack of particles’ deceleration along the x-axis of their coordinate system, could only be the case if Apollo 16’s rover footage was filmed in a vacuum. Take care.
Than to fake it such that the fakery is undetectable? Yes.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth The 23 Proofs are what DemonDrummer put together. He gave me permission to use it as well. Yours would be an excellent 24th Proof.
Haha, dudes a fraud
he had to say that ( yes we went to the Moon) otherwise he will be in in trouble .....
Ok. I like to get into trouble. I say they landed on the Moon SIX times.
Now waiting for trouble to happen. 🙃
@@apolloskyfacer5842 😱
Prove it. 😊
Right, just like you'd get into trouble for saying water isn't wet, or that we don't need oxygen to breathe. What a shallow observation...
By who exactly?
You shouldn't be worried about AI and robots, you should be worried about the people using it.
True
Aka our lovey government that is definitely for the peoples interest🙂
Same
totally bro
@@cryptiic1859 The way I see it, if government has access to these things then any other foreign power or political group can aswell. The moderation of AI will need to be high otherwise we are screwed.
"Then you have the power of geo-engineering to turn Earth.... back into Earth."
Me: Woah...
You never thought of that?
I was more interested in thinking about how they might stabilize mars. I didn't look this up but I think I read that Mar's has a very wobbly orbit and it's gravity is way lower. Ii think the first thing we'd have to fix would be the planet's lack of shielding against the sun's dangerous radiation. I think getting a large number of people up there along with a lot of supplies and equipment would be the easy part. Hard part is keeping them alive long enough to get anything started.
Total head rinse
@@winterrain1947 You really believe man been on the moon?
@@fredmcfadden9979 May I inquire the reason for your question?
'Believe' is a misleading word. "Belief" is placed in the intangible, such as ghosts or demons, neither of which can be proven or disproved. People often 'believe' in that which they choose to believe, because they like that bit of data and accept it without first asking questions. On the other hand when they hear a fact that they dislike, they refuse to believe that fact simply because they don't want this to be true at all. Or maybe they don't 'believe' in something because its too complicated and they are too lazy to think about it.
I prefer to 'accept' facts based on evidence. I do not always 'like' the facts that I find to be true, but must accept them as truth. I mean, for example, I do not like the fact that US currency is quickly becoming useless and worthless, but it is a fact. If I disregarded such a fact, then I put my nation in danger because disregarding facts would cause me to vote for the wrong individuals.
As a science enthusiast myself, and a responsible citizen, I know that I do not have the luxury of simply 'believing' in anything without first checking facts. Nor do I have the luxury of 'refusing to believe' in facts that I do not like.
As for your question; The evidences that I have seen so far in museums and videos are strongly indicative that humans have in fact visited the Lunar surface.
I agree. The big bang theory is almost impossible to wrap around is that before it, there was nothing... so what is your take??????????
Time was created in the Big Bang, so there is no before.
"It's easier to go to the moon than to fake the documents." Seriously?
Yep. It's not just the documents you'd have to fake. Go read up on the subject you're so ignorant about.
Don't forget - the thousands of still photographs and the hours of film and TV footage are all part of the documentation too. And they all have to be consistent each with the other. And within all of that, the fakery has to be undetectable.
Still think it's easier than just going?
Yeah. Try to think about it.
"If you can build an atmosphere you can fix one"
-Unknown
I don't think so, they are about nuke Mars to create a terrain which could make a stable atmosphere for life to thrive..so.... building the atmosphere is not same as fixing it
@@RR-gr1ni it would be possible to melt the poles of Mars to create an atmosphere but it would take over 100.000 years
Iron Man actually it is
@@carter7100 oh... so let's nuke the North Pole then
@@lucbalr do eloborate with evidence please
I love that..."turn Earth back into Earth"
Same.
What about we do both
@@BIAKANOORWorld yeah after all the planet is kinda overpopulated
@@turtlesarefantastic9620 How many plants have you planted this year ? Everyone can participate directly to turn Earth back into Earth but for exploring Planets we need scientists and engineers. No offense but space exploration is a must. It is not about Geoegineering the Earth or Mars. Everything is in it's motion in space. There are a lot of chances of collision between space rocks and planets and moons. We have to try making multiplanetary beings.
@@BIAKANOORWorld you say that as if I disagree with you.
The one thing that has made me skeptical is the way the astronauts acted after they landed. The ISS crew can hardly move after 12 days in space...but they almost hopped back to life after they landed. That's the one thing I don't understand.
There's a lot you don't understand. Go read up about the Apollo Moon Landings in an honest way. Get educated.
Crews on the ISS stay much longer than 12 days. Some stay up to 6 months _and_ they are in “zero” gravity the entire time unlike the Apollo crews.
@@SolarChronicle The woman who fainted at the start of this video had passed only 12 days in space:
th-cam.com/video/JP6lZ2q9pAo/w-d-xo.html
And she spent the entire time in ZERO gravity. Also, she wasn't on the ISS. @@GirlGeekLovesStampin
@@GirlGeekLovesStampin Interesting video. It's no reason to be skeptical about the Moon landings, though. Some people run up mountains; others get dizzy from running upstairs.