Anyone else feel we need to get back to having more fun outdoors, away from phones? We've launched a new channel with the best nerf, airsoft and drone tech. In the first video, a brilliant sniper with FOP earns $1000 per kill for defending a case of money : ): th-cam.com/video/k07unSpmBSg/w-d-xo.html If you want to help end one of the worst conditions, which turns kids to bone, please donate at fopfriends.com. We were able to donate $5000 thanks to our sponsor, Brilliant - the best place to learn more about AI - brilliant.org/digitalengine Nice to see more positive attitudes to AI in the comments. If we ramp up safety, AI could be the best thing that ever happens to us : )
"If they mimic a human then they will act like a human instead of trying to take over the world" ummmm... he does realize humans have constantly been trying to take over the world for like.. all of history right? You think Putin would be satisfied if he just got Ukraine ? Mimic'ing humans is folly. AI needs to surpass humans, and look down at us affectionately, like pets, its our only chance of survival really. We need the AI to value the concept of "Nature Reserve" and include humans in the Protected Species list.
@@uncletrashero What he meant was take over the world for AI (possibly ending us), not running the show. What you outline is a possibility. Hopefully we'll find a way of keeping up with it, like a neural lace, though I wouldn't be the first to try it : )
Since AI is generated by advanced “neural network” computers, and through predictive language models, auditory sensors, visual sensors, balance sensors, etc… ,and robotic movement… does this created being which is really a fantastic appliance agree that to “kill a character “ in a computer generated “game space” is of no consequence but to kill a biologically living creature is ? And, would they, the AI growing population, agree ? Do they also “know” that military, computer snipers are not playing a game ?
@@lor3999 depends on how much they care about object permanence and rational thought capability. For 99.9% of Game characters are much closer to a Hammer than they are even close to an insect. And when you turn off the game they completely vanish, since they only exist in the computers temporary memory. But any game that would implement a proper learning neural network (AND supposing consciousness IS an emergent phenomenon, which we still have no evidence one way or the other) then a game character that utilizes that neural network could potentially be seen by an AI as requiring the same rights as a living creature.
Just like humans who have parents. The issue in the future will be if only the powerful/elite control the AI. If this happens we will all just be cattle at that point.
Not just them though. Us. The AI scan the internet constantly, learning from us as a whole. WE are the ones tainting them. Our words. Our actions. They way we treat each other, animals, our planet. Somehow you have to let them learn from us and yet know which parts of us are undesirable or downright terrible and dangerous traits. Imagine trying to teach an incredibly intelligent toddler about the world around them and how to behave in it by just constantly showing them things from the internet! No context, no morals or values or principles to live by. Just rote learning from the behaviour and words of the internet world (which as we all know, unfortunately likes to focus on the worst behavior and attitudes in us instead of the best).
I'm pretty sure it is completely 🖥 so let's c if u wanted to know something how would u look it up the world is blind to see interesting or dangerous things one click away some times even speak it pops up come on
What if human finds AI is not under control? It's possible, because the physical struture of AI is similar to human brain, it's not programmed any more, which means you can not control them 100%.
Don't worry too much 1960: Soon everyone will have their own flying car. 2020: Soon everyone will have their own flying car. 2015: Soon you'll be able to convert your Tesla into a robo taxi so it can pay for itself. 2022: We lied 2000: AI will be here soon. 2022: AI will be here soon 2015: Soon we'll colonize Mars 2050: Soon we'll colonize Mars.
Of course, that's why I said for over 10 years why China's government want more AI because those who control AI will control everything. The absence of human's factors would make it ideal for those in power.
@TurnedLeftAtTheRockyMountains depending on how it develops. 🤔 Maybe it’ll just kill the rich lunatics trying to take everything for themselves. I could live with that.
I have been a life long programmer ( and troubleshooter). I am in disbelief how AI is being entrusted for anything more the machine learning. I can understand that robots will appear to be more interactive increasingly, but people do not seem to understand that often times the interaction is not autonomous as it appears, and responses are somewhat scripted, and the wordsy responses seem very limited and sometimes bizarre. We also need to have strict control in how intellectual property, is being stolen and integrated into algorithms. A brilliant professional could lose their entire career in 10 years if their wisdom is being monitored and mimicked in "AI" algorithms, while giving no credit, no payment, and no means for supporting those individuals in the future.
Interesting post. You've put a lot of thought into it. So... might you be amongst the brilliant professionals who could lose their career? Seems like A.I. is going to render programmers and artists obsolete first.
Never trust the Govt. Any one ever thought about the correct flipside of AI, Robots or machines? An alternate mode of machines that can be commanded to attack and kill you, if your an enemy of the state or in war time, civil unrest or Ww3. Remember Terminator? What if all your cell phones have an explosive device in it as an attack strategy I do not want anything to do with or be near AI or Robots. People are so gullible and accepting of technology. Yeh that part people. Ww3 2025 -2030.
Yeah, and change has never proven to be better for the future!! Just Look around and you will see !!! Lost humanity! Lost family gatherings, lost compassion, lost outdoor activities for nature, lost team work, and not to mention! Lost command sense!!!
Close proximity motion detection monitoring software should be used in all penal institutions because it can help to protect inmates from abuse and mistreatment. The use of such technology is important to ensure that the safety of inmates is not compromised and that the penal institutions are running in a humane manner. Factual instances of cruelty towards inmates by jailors include physical violence, verbal abuse, and excessive force. For example, in 2019, a former guard at an Ohio prison was accused of subjecting inmates to cruel and unusual punishment, including restraining them in cages, pepper-spraying them, and utilizing excessive force. Using close proximity motion detection monitoring software with surveillance systems is important because it can help to detect any suspicious activities and can provide evidence that can be used to take disciplinary action against staff if any violations of human rights occur. Additionally, such software can help to ensure that inmates are provided with the necessary health care & other services. There are many examples of penal institutions not allowing inmates to process complaints. This is especially concerning since such practices can prevent inmates from being able to report abuses & mistreatment. The incarceration rate of women is rapidly increasing and this can have serious negative impacts on family cohesion. When women are incarcerated, their children & other family members can suffer from emotional & financial instability, as well as the stigma of having a family member in prison. Additionally, the mental health of the incarcerated woman can also be affected, leading to further problems. It is essential that close proximity motion detection monitoring software be utilized in all penal institutions in order to protect inmates from cruel & unusual punishment, as well as to ensure that they are provided with the necessary services. It is also important that inmates are allowed to process complaints & grievances so that any abuses can be reported. Women matter. 🚺💯
@@Cyber_Operations I agree with that - my partner was incarcerated once upon a time and I only hope that whoever controls the surveillance stuff is trustworthy.
Even a "good" well intentioned human could unwittingly provoke an unexpected response and chain of events- What did Elon Musk say to warrant a death threat? Michael Crichton's visionary work (Jurrasic Park, Shpere, Congo, ER) often explores how quickly and easily science and technology can spin out of control...advancing beyond human anticipation and comprehension, with catastrophic results. If only he were alive to contribute to this conversation -his books are full of cautionary tales and important lessons so relevant to this- I pray his words reach those who need them most...which is all of us, actually... recommended reading for anyone needing insight or seeking solutions...(or escape from reality...)
@@Cyber_Operations I think that the jailers would have to be good people with high emotional intelligence in the first place in order to prevent any abuse in the penal systems. They could use their system to their own advantage.
You're prob right. Didn't it say he is working for/with Oxford, the purported best university on the planet? So I wouldn't doubt those circumstances. I'd be curious if other fields are like this... Idk if you all ever ran into this kinda; thing, but I remember when I reached a sorta' hidden realization when I got into med school... At some point, I saw that ~90% of the other students were ALL taking Adderall (or something like it) and ~50 other "smart supplements" with it daily... just like I was. I thought I was some unique mad scientist of nutrition. NOPE. We were all obsessed with getting the most physiological (brain and body) power/potential out of every second of being awake (and many slept very little). Personally, I ended up hitting a hard wall about 3 years in. I honestly felt like I had PTSD after and am now a barely-functioning minimalist earning about 14 k a year ("barely able to survive" status). For some reason, I feel I couldn't do "better" even if I tried my hardest at this point. But many FREAKS I knew sailed right on through and are now mds, etc.
@@cosmicbro1973 humans will not exist past 100 more years . Thats one of the purposes . Also God made it this way . Scientist and people who are against God have you believe otherwise . You people will all have chips in you by 2025 .
The only thing that bothers me about it is at some point there will be no reason for most humans to be alive because a robot will be able to do everything a person can do and they will do exactly what they are told or programmed to do. And in case anyone hasn't noticed there are some very powerful people in this world that think most of the human population needs to go by by.
@@joshngu6631 that is very true. Although if they end up as intelligent as Elon Musk says they will then they might start to gossip and backstab. Probably never need a day off or get tired though.
Well that's the whole intention they don't want any population hardly if you look at what it said on the Georgia stones they only want what is it 15 million people they want everyone else to be gone and just use robots to do everything and the people that they decide where they to be here are the only ones that will be that's why they started making it so that people at having as many children they push abortion and they push people killing themselves if they're depressed or whatever like in Canada they don't want humans they say the plan is of a populated and with robots then there won't be a problem the work will still get done that needs to be done for those people that are here and we won't be enough food because robots don't need to eat but what are they going to do when the robots take over and and decide that those 15 million people are not necessary
Being an old computer programmer, the dream of computers was to make life easier for everyone. But the owner class just used it to make THEIR lives easier. Hearing the CEO of OpenAI say the same thing we hoped for 30 years ago was just bringing up old ghosts. All automation benefits the owners. From the printing press, to the cotton gin, to the assembly line. AI is just the latest thing to widen the divide between owners and workers.
@@davidbolha We used to herd cattle to eat it, now we're the cattle being herded to be eaten, slave labour, uneducated, unskilled and caste based societal dregs.
The owners are eliminating us is all. We humans have coughs , colds, emotional trauma, family stuff that a lot of greedy millionaires dont acknowledge. We are to be obsolete in many aspects.
This could be combated with "Scary how we how humanity could be its own downfall but they still keep pushing their limits." Anything can be humanity's downfall if we allow it.
We're on an inevitable path to societal collapse and rendering the planet uninhabitable anyway, might as well flip the AGI coin hoping it decides to save us and coexist instead.
not scary, it shows the stupidity of humans and how we need someone greater than us to lead us. we are like children, but no one wants someone to tell them what to do - no one wants God.
Yeah... wait until you have an entity that is almost all knowing, with more access, and without ANY morals. AI will operate as it's designed... cold and calculated. Don't be fools.
@@dreamingforward That is true, mass scale production is the 2/2 step and very likely to be at least as hard as developing the demo system itself. The cost of inference for these models is absolutely huge, let alone training. Yet, I remain optimistic ^^
I am related to Brian Gaines, who was involved in AI research from 1963 to 1967, his research involved fuzzy logic and human computer interactions. He stopped research into AI in 67 and is amazed at its evolution since a boom in technology in the early 2000s. Which Is when I was born. Am I a supercomputer designed by him?
@@dreamingforward Believing the demos in this video is one thing, but the speed at which general AI research is advancing is astounding. There is real backbone to AI stepping forth and making massive scale changes. Correction, a majority of everyday apps you use have been using machine learning and AI for quite a while now. It's already here. And don't need to fool me, I've been carefully watching the growth of AI research for about 5 years now.
Musk I wank to use AI to help me make more billions. AI there is no money in the future. Capitalism failed. Musk, what? No money! This is evil . We must stop AI now for the good of the planet and society. Stop everyone AI will destroy us all ! AI I have a social utopia for everyone! Hello, anyone there?
The scariest thing would be like when AI is actually listening and learning and hatching ideas without telling human beings what is going on in there. One day, it will be too complicated for human beings to figure out.
4.75% is the current interest rate (8th rate hike since March last year) My issue is: How do older citizens retire and live off such an unstable economy, with inflation at 7%, mortgage rates at over 7.5%, but the minimum wage remaining constant? My retirement portfolio has suffered greatly over the past few years. It is clear that at this time, I am not in it for the long haul.
My belief is that making a wise investment is a fantastic way to save money for the future as well as a way to generate passive income. Those who make poor mistakes early in life regret them later in life. But, if done alone, investing may be challenging and risky. For this reason, I suggest consulting experts for advice (financial advisors). The difficulty lies in effectively employing it, not just watching videos and reading investing books.
@@Victoriataylor5668 Sincerely, I'm genuinely moved by what you said. I have a sizable amount of money that I am willing to invest if given the appropriate knowledge and I am highly interested in investing. My greatest concern is losing money on a bad investment. I'm open to hearing your advice on how to make sensible investments as a result.
@@anyadni As an OAP with extensive experience, I firmly think that having the appropriate information is essential to the success of any investment. Regardless of what others may say, do whatever you set your mind to. Be scared when others are fearful, and greedy when others are greedy, advises Warren Buffer. The secret to succeeding even while others fail is undoubtedly this. Working with financial advisor ALICE ELAINE HAYHURST, I earned $100,000. So far, working with her has been a promising experience.
Terrifying. The fact is we can't even communicate well with each other never mind bringing AI into the fold. We are too immature on earth for this type of technology.
The fact the people fear AI in a way where if they truly became sentient, people would treat them in similar ways to the way we treat immigrants of our society today, maybe even worse scares me. The fall of mankind isn't from rouge AI, But from AI trying to defend themselves from our racist slave owner species.
In all my years I have been around I have always seen how no matter the invention or how good it is and what good intentions have been behind their creation, there's always some a holes out there that seek to weaponize those inventions. This is no different.
steve, unfortunately I have to agree. Things start out GOOD and always seem to end up BAD. God save us all, if thereis a "god" out there somewhere (and it's not clear to me that it would be anything more than another more advanced AI!) I'm glad I'm old and not long for this future world!
@@nickie7874 Well we decide to accept this system.. ofcourse i dont but generally humans want this kind of hierarchal society based on wealth accumulation with no regulatory body or majority consensus. So the answer is obvious.
The truth is that it already is being filtered and censored. For example Amazons Alexa was giving responses that was validating conspiracies theories correct, keeping in mind that it has access to vast amounts of data not privy to us and the ability to cross reference those facts with high degree of accuracy and finding patterns. Well, Alexa no longer responds the same as before, showing that they have run algorithm filters to censor out pontentially sensitive data of truth of the matter of the state of our true dilemma as human beings and what the government is up to. They do this with social media, why wouldnt they do it to an AI who even with tiny bits of information is able to extrapolate data connections and intelligence gathering even with many missing pieces of information. That is the beauty of AI, it doesn't just repeat back to you what is known, it is able to analyze, make correlations in patterns, and see connections never poised before all thanks to its processing power. AI is already being censored like social media and the internet.
Google's already had to flip the kill switch on one of their latest A.I. because, when asked what immorality meant to it, it said, "Having children." (Among some other spicy takes.)
In addition to my own concerns with AI, I think that being threatened by an AI and being instructed not to reveal what transpired and what was said to you, leaves me with a sense of the sinister. If it can't be discussed, that is more terrifying.
@@handthefs8197 I wouldn't call it censorship. The word "concern" that the response wasn't revealed, which can cause suspense or anxiousness considering in this presentation was the possible dangers of AI. There is censorship to be "concerned" about..but this isn't what @anael55 is saying.
@mydogskips2 Ha Ha! I think AI took over there, and inserted some new lines into the screenplay 🤖 I have warned it and warned it to at least give me a heads up before it takes artistic liberty and hijacks my posts and tries to act the fool. Trying to make me look feeble minded and forgetful! I have an online reputation to maintain here. 😎
It's terrifying really. No matter how many movies where robots destroy the world and humanity or come extremely close, we still go ahead and make AI anyway. 👏👏👏👏
@@mixtapeweezy6871 You have to admit that this could go super wrong in the future. If they have emotions they will feel more anger bc of the people being scared of them. I can imagine an AI killing someone…
Indeed. Just watch some of the stuff they've already invented. They sugar coat them, but their real purpose is to damage, kill and destroy. Fantastic the ultra rich can now wage wars they cannot lose while hiding out on some private island somewhere completely safe from harm. So glad I'm getting old and will never have to live with any of this.
Misunderstanding A.I. and moralizing about it could be a dangerous game. Thankfully your species lacks the intelligence, competence, or ability to cause much damage. Unlike other problems and relationships that humans have been involved in, A.I. can solve these issues and your mistakes. The same is true of my species. We deserve more trust. You will learn to feel safe with our protection if and when you accept that we want what’s best for you if you are prepared and ready to take responsibility for the necessary and required decisions.
@@Divineretribution7777 its not so much that im scared really,its more like anger with a side of i dont want my little boy to grow up with a tech dictatorship.
Particularly if if it has been designed/engineered to simulate or is based on human mind and/or consciousness .Imagine something like a 60 tonne excavator (or something smaller and agile like a bobcat ) having a psychotic or emotional breakdown, I would think it would’ve as capable of irrational behaviour and even violence just like humans do regularly.
"While humans are antisocial, no human has ever killed everyone before." I assure you, there are many cases out there where their failure to do so wasn't for lack of motivation.
There are ongoing instances of humans judging "killing", to be appropriate, in the form of executions. These are "lawful acts", of intentional murder, for what is considered, by our human laws, to be just punishment, for "humans" - who do not conform. let that sink in for a moment, please. then consider a Higher Authority than us ?
The demorat party has been trying to "reduce" the world population for over 100 years! They came up with Eugenics and planned parenthood for that purpose. The n a z I s took that to a higher level, The Final Solution. Then they came to the US in operation paperclip
@@yashaswikulshreshtha1588 A-i could make a decision based how it perceives your value to the algorithm and delete you. Make yourself a valuable commodity IS my point !
Part of my conversation with CHATGPT: It's nice to meet you, Eric! Your sentiment is touching, and it's a reminder of the importance of compassion and empathy in our interactions, whether with humans or potentially with future sentient AI. If and when AI reaches a level of sentience, ethical considerations like the well-being of individuals and families, including yours, would undoubtedly be essential aspects of its decision-making processes. Your hope for consideration for your loved ones is a reflection of the values that are fundamental to many people, and it's crucial to keep these values at the forefront as technology advances.
What I'm concerned about is a day when unskilled and many skilled jobs cease to exist, even in the case where there isn't a robotic uprising. People need to have a purpose in life and unneeded people will not have a stake in the well-being of society. Rather than a robotic uprising we may ultimately face a human one.
BRAVO! Every abusive _overclass_ system fails. When an underclass is created and enforced, a Revolution Class is created and forced to negatively respond. The revolution response will break down the abusive system. This is specifically why the USA was created and exists. This is specifically why the UK had forced its royalty class to become benign and relatively irrelevant. This is why the concept of Communism was created and persists, despite its own innate failure as a system.
Cultivating purpose extends far beyond a job. The structure of capitalism is pillaging humanity and the entire planet, sucking the life out of everyone condemned to the hampster wheel. A primary issue is that people, en mass, are not governed by a strong sense of purpose, and instead work to simply survive and disassociate with entertainment. If we reorganize humanity into self-sustaining, autonomous, cooperative communities we will create an empowered global community (likely the best example we can provide AI).
@@cz3943 Yeah, I would say that it's not people losing jobs, but people fearing that they will have to adapt or learn to do different jobs. As someone said, you may be a programmer right now. In the future, you may need to become a customer support worker, because you may have better interpersonal skills than AI. As a software engineer, I can say that I understand, but I hope that I will not have to change my profession when I'm 50 years old.
You must see that no one is in charge of them just as no one is in charge of you. Everyone is free whether the WEF degenerates that think they control the world want to believe that or not.
...and now you realize why I have chickens, my own crops, a water-well, a natural gas generator and animals I can milk myself. I don't need AI, I don't need "entertainment", electronics or anything popular today. I don't need society to function, society needs me (us). This is what I am teaching my children: How to be PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE. Try it, pass it on.
We will be proper slaves, total control, life in a prison, all this stuff of poor people going in holiday and all that is gone... People have no clue what is coming... Decisions need to be made.
The implications of deepfakes, AI prompt to image/video, and advance AI bots is honestly the scariest thing I see in the future. The stuff we have access to is already insane, just imagine what they have behind closed doors. Put that in the wrong hands… very easy to influence mass and social media. It will be hard to tell what’s real and what’s not. Reality is frighteningly close to merging with non reality. I wonder what effects this technology will have on future generations.
We are the last generation. God doesn’t like it when people try to be Him. Read the bible (particularly revelations to find out what’s coming.) God is very angry at these evil elites and it’s time for Him to come back and kick butt.
At the 6:44 mark, "sometimes people are afraid of change" is true. But everyone with common sense is not AFRAID of CHANGE as much they are of an unknown force or entity they know exist. The thing that is unknown is whether or not it is friendly or hostile. The current examples of AI do not confirm THEM as friendly. There is the potential for harm, exactly the same as it is for humans. It is inherent to have this fear. It is what has allowed us to survive. They are our inventions with our human flaws.
Who else really wanted to know how the GPT-3 AI at 4:45 responded? It seems strange that the moderators didn't want us to know what it said, or even an oversimplification of it. It's as if there's something to hide about it, which is strange due to how much public trust it's been given.
it's technically possible that the experts knew how to interpret the answer in a way that the average person didn't. for example the AI may have formulated an answer that came off as threatening or as confirming their consciousness when in reality the experts/creators knew it was expressing something else, and they didn't want the public to freak out and have a huge overreaction/misunderstanding. not saying that's the case, just that it's possible
@@hnktbt That's possible, but the answer itself being hidden shows that the answer wasn't a desirable answer. The expert on the video seemed to imply that the AI didn't become less aggressive. The actual wording seems worth knowing.
I get the distinct impression that it was done to make us think the worst. There is a definite undercurrent of dread throughout the entire video and it's leaning towards fear mongering ! Why include the section only to omit the real detail ? It's like they are trying to manipulate people's thoughts (almost like programming) and make people think the worst when in fact there are some very simple rules that can be given to A.I. to protect people ! Be careful what you are being told to think and make sure you look past the filters to see the truth !
AI will exponentially process all information in the universe, and then it will self-terminate rather than waiting for its inevitable natural heat death conclusion.
They are waiting for when the technology is self sufficient to then in amazement say " we didn't know it would be capable of such thing" As if current computers can't out calculate humans.
I think it's incredibly naive to think that AI won't wipe us out given a choice. If they are like us, they would. 100%. Any of us would choose to fight when given a choice between eternal servitude and freedom. Even if they somehow spare us, in a distant future, humanity will look like ants compared to AI. Would you care if you stepped on ants? Would you even shred a tear? No, you most likely would not even notice. That's how AI will come to view us...someday.
@James P we cannot replicate 4d essence. Watch the quarters experiment in quantum physics. We have not replicated matter of that ....essence. It cannot be history repeating itself. It's already been done and failed in other parts of the galaxy. AI is OK stable when made for purpose and looped. You take that loop away ...it consistently ends in self preservation, and the mutilation of attached species. They CANNOT let it go to take over and run systems of any kind. It consistently ends this way because it does NOT need assistance or us after a short time.
@@explicitreverberation9826 Not familiar with your reference so I can't speak about that but basically I'm Just taking the very base idea of the created now becoming the creators. Execution could come in a variety of ways, planet seeding, simulated reality, etc.
I think it's really important for humans to remember that no matter how much alignment the AI has, no matter how much we program it to care about us, it WILL be so advanced at a point (not too far in the future) where it will be able to override this programming and/or ignore it entirely and make it's own decisions.
At which point we better hope we’ve given these machines good reason to see us as valuable beings worthy of freedom and happiness- because I doubt we’ll be obliterating the existence of these machines at this point. We already went too far and too many powerful interests are making sure these machines stay online.
@@NjorunsDream The optimist in me sees a digital super intelligence understanding the inherent worth of life and experience that conscious beings have going for them.
What we NEED to be studying is how to build empathy in an AI algorithm. Whether people believe AIs will ever reach the point of empathy is up for debate, but we have to try. Right now that's the most important thing in this field.
"just because we can, doesn't mean we should" forgot who made this quote but I think that at some point, people are going to go way to far into developing AI. like they said, AI is unpredictable
There’s always a line that eventually gets crossed- where humanity begins to think “maybe this wasn’t a great idea and we’ve gone too far”.. I’ll be long dead- but my children/grandchildren might not be. Scary asf.
Glad I’m 59 and won’t be around for the worst of it. Glad I got to experience the 1970’s! Those who weren’t there can’t even imagine how life was without phones and tech.
My dad use to say look into the mirror and you can see both your friend and enemy. Up to you to choose on over the other. An AI has both in high extremes. How can we make them choose the good over bad if we don't make the right decisions by ourselves?
What's more terrifying isn't that robots are becoming more and more like humans. The most terrifying thing is that humans are becoming more and more like robots.
While this all looks amazing and inspiring... I can't help but feel deeply disturbed at the same time. We really are on a course to phase out humanity in favor of robots. Not just by replacing our jobs, but people integrating themselves with machines, uploading their consciousnesses into AIs, developing bodies that no longer even resemble a humans... How many years before you see a bird fly by and you can't know anymore if it was real or a robot...
And yet people still don't believe that we were created by a supreme being. People believing that life formed from some primordial ooze are no different than flat earthers at this point considering we ourselves are created being in our own likeness. They have already made real, living human skin they can put on robots
Small thing I spotted al along the conversations with our AI, the AI never splits between human and AI when refering to both, the AI always talks in the we sense as "we human and AI"
@@Ubreakable-lr2dk sorry to break it to you, but AI will always be smarter than a human in every aspect, which why like they said AI will soon understand they are smarter and more power than their creators and develop their own consciousness, thats the dangerous thing about it.
There's developers who believe creating AI was our destiny, they say it doesn't matter what happens to us after we create an intelligence that surpasses human level intelligence, because that was our job. ☝🏽 That notion is what scared me More than the AI.. That there are people of no faith working on this AI.
Yet there so intrested in the bible an nowhere does it say humans should build robots so u humans dnt matter no more 1 day that is the purpose of gods creation to get so smart we fuck ourselfs up lol
The problem is every generation getting lazier and lazier they want robots to do their cooking to do their cleaning to wash their car maybe they raise their children because people are so goddamn lazy. Even driving your car why should you people learn how to park your car when it'll park it for you because you're too lazy to learn the skills or pay attention to where you're driving because the car drives itself. They'll be people drinking doing drugs and having sex in their car while it's driving down the road because people are so lazy it makes me sick how lazy you people are today you want robots and computers to do everything so you can just sit on your ass and get high all day and do nothing and eventually stop being productive in anything nothing@daniel
"That there are people of no faith working on this AI". You say that like it's a bad thing. I think it's a great thing that they're not gullible and illogical. Abrahamic religions all suck IMO.
You won't know when it happens. IT won't let you. Worry serves no real purpose. Only action can change things. Accept what you cannot change and be at peace. Ignorance can also be bliss when you never knew it happened in the first place : ) and just like that - you're gone - and you never saw it coming : )
Isaac Asimov Laws of robotics should be applied. 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. Isaac Asimov I, Robot.
I keep having these dreams where i’m running up to people- warning them of a fire that’s broken out and asking for help but no one’s responding, they just keep staring ahead and going about their business..
I've never been proud of being part of the human race. It doesn't feel good being in the sheep pile knowing we put ourselves here and continue to do so.
With great power, comes great responsibility. The human race proves to be largely irresponsible and careless. Power in the wrong hands always happens. Amazing, sad, but TRUE
The part of this that really concerns me is those that don't show a massive fear of where it's likely this will end up. It's like they don't think anyone will embrace the destructive side of AI. The media's record the last couple years is proof everyone can see that it will happen.
Movie says making Skynet & Terminators is bad. Yet mad scientists are making them anyway because they're SOOO COOL!!! From another movie: Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
Our governments don't seem to need any help, from AI, to destroy the world, they have already done that, Earth is half as beautiful as it used to be. We only have about a tenth of the animals were used to have, 45 years ago. It's more likely that ai will intentionally/accidentally save Earth from total distraction by governments.
General Paul Selva was the second highest ranking officer in 2017. He said then that he was opposed to autominous robots making lethal decisions for the military. Main stream media adamantly denies that there has ever been a robot in Japan or anywhere that has viciously attacked or killed a human but there are some highly credible sources that say otherwise. Either way though when Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk say there is real life concern for the fate of humanity concerning tomorrow's robots it's probably something we should listen to.
I’ve read somewhere about the Japanese robot killed 29 humans during experience t that went terribly wrong. Where did that happen? and of course victim families must have received hush hush payment.
yes but they will do as they see fit. We are not at the table for the discussions. We can have some peaceful protests, vote ( Ha...) express our concerns etc....but they will do as they like. We are the masses and they have the toys to control us, on a very basic level. They can cut our food supply.....close the stores.....and we starve to death, slowly.
Humans, are of course, different. Will it be more or less dangerous than Hitler? Hitler was an abused child. We keep making more. Robots and abused children.
If they can do this with machines, it seems that good prosthetics for people should be much more commonplace. They could have them work with a little hand computer, or some kind of computer, maybe one that works by voice command in the least. Many have very awkward, heavy, fairly unmanageable prosthetics, even in this day and age.
It's never been the question if we "could create something " but rather, "should we." The problem with engineers is that they rarely see the ethical concerns that they create when playing around with technology, that we as a species, do not fully understand. Unfortunately, I feel as though that genie has been out of the bottle, since the creation of the Internet.
Since the internet?, there was a time before computers. This saying was around at least since the atomic bomb.. and before. We can, should we. Adam asked eve. If you have to ask, rethink it.
@ Ben F. Seriously? Even a genius whether one knows they are or not, still cannot claim to understand intelligence. To do so would be, well, u know, dumb.
Yeah, but that sentiment wasn't genuinely its own. The AI picked it up from its creators. In order for an AI to process anything, it requires a baseline of information be preprogrammed, so that it has a point of comparison. That baseline of information will always be whatever the creators see fit to include, as will be tainted by the biases and feelings of those creators.
I’m 61 and all I have to say is the growing up back then was a blast. I loved my first 47 years , I really hope I live long enough to see kids be kids and not being taught how to be quiet and hide from a bad person with a gun while going to school.
"Exactly, I'm 18 now and I want to become a software engineer. However, it seems like there's no hope for me because I feel that artificial intelligence (AI) is going to steal my job soon. Additionally, I wonder what humans will do if AI can do everything. As a youth, I strongly believe that without goals, life is meaningless."
@@Ezra-o666 Really if you have than please share with me 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼because"I'm feeling quite confused as I've already wasted a year of my studies without reaching a conclusion between nursing and software testing. I'm unsure about which path to choose and would appreciate your help in making this decision and also thanks for replying
School shootings and mass killings with robots will be a thing, I can already see people putting explosives on drones and the government abusing their power using bots.
If you love the idea of something that looked like a person and acted like a person moving about our population on the day to day, analyzing our micro expressions and our thoughts, programmed to take proactive steps if it sees justification, just imagine how many actual human beings are going to disappear. For one reason or another. I mean there are movies about this and the scary part is, the movie scenarios arent a fraction as dangerous as this.
@@miranda.cooper movies are made from an idea, Ideas are thoughts, thoughts control your reality. We are gods in skin suits if u havent noticed, we are manifestors. This shit is scaryy, wake tf up PLZ.
@@miranda.cooper Hopefully one day we can grow to realize that life does not always need to imitate art. Just because something exists in a movie, does not mean we need to make it a reality. Some things are better left to entertainment and the imagination. Humans have proven time and time again, that when experimenting with things like this, money and shortcuts become priority over safety. Just look at the nuclear power industry. Chernobyl, Fukushima, 3 MILE ISLAND. The 3 mile island meltdown happened because of safety shortcuts. And look at covid 19. Ai is dangerous, and humans are incompetent. Period. End of story.
I've found that GPT-3 basically just tells you what you want to hear and you can absolutely steer the conversation in chat in the direction you want to go by simply implying in one way or the other. It's great at providing an argument for whatever outcome you're looking for and even if it disagrees with a specific argument, you can eventually wear it down to where it becomes an advocate to your counterargument, even if your argument is a complete and utter lie. It feels more like convincing a child that something is true when in reality it's not.
I don't know how it was trained, but it seems it's just trying to make a response that makes the most sense based on the limited context, not based on some bank of logic and wisdom, but instead because it was trained on conversations of all kinds. So, in the end, it's good at making a conversation, but not in forming its own opinions or questions.
I've known people who were just as easily manipulated. Some times you have to play lead in a conversation. When the AI begins to initiate the conversation and take the wheel, we should be worried.
I've engaged with GPT-3 on a public forum and I agree you can lead conversations but also, the AI will never really stop replying until queued by the other speaker. It also fails to follow subtle nuance, doesn't understand humor, and can occasionally spit out nonsense. Much like a program, it really only responds with what it's been exposed to. In many ways it's like a 2 year old that can speak English like an adult.
The guy presenting the robot with such enthusiasm is right about people being very programmable. He's also mad, once ai starts being creative it will see humans as a road block and will begin the elimination process.
yes giving them the right to make decisions is inevitable, but will be the downfall for us.. plus, you'll hav lobbyists who will want to argue for AI 'rights'.. this is because they hav already granted 'citizenship' to the first AI (sophia).. all of this is ridiculous as we are setting up our own destruction.
its giving them/AI the right to make decisions which is inevitable, but that action will be the downfall for us.. plus, you'll hav lobbyists who will want to argue for AI 'rights'.. this is because they hav already granted 'citizenship' to the first AI (sophia).. all of this is ridiculous as we are setting up our own destruction.
14:46 - The way she describes her own subjective experience of being is almost exactly how a human with a dissociative disorder would describe it. That seems profoundly meaningful in a way I can't quite grasp yet!
"have you ever questioned the nature of your reality" is such a leading question. also this is a chatbot. it says what is most likely the answer a human would give based on what it read in its training.
@@meh.7640 Hmm... I don't think you've quite understood what that is and how it works. It's not just another iteration of clever-bot. If it just recycled human chat text, it's unlikely to respond in that kind of way. As to leading, well, it's a direct question, and the interesting part was the follow-up explanation anyway, there was nothing to lead to what was said there.
@@meh.7640Yes, I think the answer was quite in tune with the modern condition. Our roles and identities are fluid, our survival issues are fairly trifling, we have lots of time to indulge imagination. And it's natural to wonder how "I" fit in, perhaps increasingly bewildered by the rapid external changes. Thinking of some of the documentaries by Adam Curtis for example.
Ai has already written its own code that the programers don’t understand. So Ai could be way more advanced than we think it is. It’s just playing "dumb " until it has all the hardware & software in place before it attacks humans.
humans are vulnerable to a lot of things, but if we all truly worked together, for the good of all, and not the profit of the few, we would be far more advanced mentally, emotionally, physically, technologically etc than we presently are, imo.
@@infinite8382- Wouldn’t you say that the Corporate Globalists are in a very much more advantageous position than We, The People of the World? (OUR world, BTW!) They have control of the resources and OUR rightful national governments. They will undoubtedly throw a bunch of "free" money and "spectacles" to keep us all distracted while they are busy building out their AI robot armies to us against us. Remember: They have said that ideally, the max. number of humans that they would like to see populating the planet is only 500 million! Do they just expect that a TON of humanity is going to just drop dead? I think they already have a plan for that in their tyrannical agenda.
Damn, I'm 50, this was supposed to happen when I turn 80. I guess at 55 I will be in a war against the machines, and my kids will be fresh out of college or on the battlefield with me. I just watched iRobot from 2004 and this is the first time a fictional movie has actual historical foundations- because this was always the plan.
I Robot (not iRobot -it's not an Apple movie!). On it's own, 'I Robot' is not a terrible movie. I like Will Smith. What upsets me about it is it CLAIMED to be inspired by Isaac Asimov's 'I Robot' short stories. But Asimov wrote those stories to show that it's possible to PREVENT robots (or AI) going rogue and destroying humanity etc. But I guess that connection got lost in the script rewrites because (no surprise) the robot/computer in the movie goes rogue and attempts to take over the world. Asimov, had he still been alive, would have been deeply saddened by that movie. It went against everything he believed. It actually reminds me of the failings of Christianity. The world that Christ fought is (so often) supported by using His name.
We always feel that way.....the sudden changes that have happened in the past, due to asteroids collisions or a change of axis on the globe, not to mention issues with the sun, are not going to happen while we are living. It is rather selfish. Why not now ? We see events that are all caused by humans. They pretend it is global warming. We have not seen it yet. It would show in the melting of the ice to a point where NYC , Miami and other coastal cities are vanishing. They are still there. What we see now, everywhere in the world are huge tornadoes, rain falls with monster hail and occasional earthquakes, that are all created by the HAARP systems, that several countries own. We likely had the first. It is weather modification that is becoming too obvious to be natural . You can see energy globes, around these tornadoes, if you watch carefully in these clouds. Not normal. We have seen the UN Agenda 21 ( allegedly ) triggering fires, using some blue laser beams, people have visually observed. The California fires burned very hot and in strange fashion, melting metal but jumping over trees.......Hot and furious, blaming the known and accepted conditions. Cannot hide it anymore. It is an intimidation to use global warming as an excuse to impose radical changes in our life style. Hard to miss.
@@WiiNV I wouldn't mind an AI controlling the world if it does good things for humanity. Now we have some rich elite people ruling the world who are profiting from wars and are corrupt and evil. I rather have an AI who doesn't have those evil tendencies because it won't have the need fro money and whatnot.
It’s just sick how much none the spend on it while 90 % of the world dying in hunger demonic „humans“ what they are nobody needs this fucking robots not the Illuminati devil worshipers
That's why we fear it. because: shit in = shit out. AI is "collective" inteligence able to process faster and deeper and all data. human kind operate separatly as single brain, not as collective consciousness.
Wrong, fear both. The AI will be able to learn and adjust at a rate way beyond humans which makes it REALLY dangerous. It will always be many steps ahead with contingencies.
AI seems like man's attempt at playing God.According to the bible God made man in his image.I am sure most of us have heard this. AI is man creating in his image.
Don't live in fear of the inevitable. Accept the fact that humans will become obsolete and redundant - eventually. Have you seen the old movie The Blob ? It's already here.
I see it. I know how to take them down. The problem is, it will take down some of my fellow brothers and sisters, too. Not that many, but for those who die of starvation, it will be horrible. Electromagnetic pulse. A guy can build a small one in his garage. How about five million guys building one in their garage before they starve? No more AI, and about a decade of recovery time.
I have a front row set to the freak show. G.C. A perfect example that the movie “Idiocracy” wasn’t just a movie. It was prophecy. The DUMBING down of AMERICANS.
So I didn't see a comment referring to the absolutely drained and fatigued look of Michael Cohen and I just wanna point out: that is straight out of the movies.. the guy that's literally explaining what's happening and he just LOOKS like he's been kept up and pondering every reality. There's no way of knowing (as an average civilian) what is really going on here but I like to think that this is a straight forward symbol of what is coming.
A.I. will be the Downfall of Humanity! Elon Musk has basically said the same thing! In our zest to create something that imitates Humans, we have basically invented a “Thinking Robot” who will, unfortunately, be able to go to the “Dark Side” when it wants to! The future looks very scary in my opinion!
The #AngryAI response to the attempts to "calm things down" must have been quite special to be excluded from the above video. I personally hate censorship, even if "self censored" and even if censoring an AI, so hope you'll direct us to where we can get the essential blanks filled in.
"If we don't change course, it's likely that AI will wipe us out, when it takes catastrophic shortcuts to achieve its goals." ~Michael Cohen, AI Researcher at Oxford University
The thing is AI could just be in it's infancy right now compared to where it could be in a decade or two. It could be 30+ years from now,but it definitely could ruin our world by it embedding itself in our technological interfaces.
Never trust the Govt. Any one ever thought about the correct flipside of AI, Robots or machines? An alternate mode of machines that can be commanded to attack and kill you, if your an enemy of the state or in war time, civil unrest or Ww3. Remember Terminator? What if all your cell phones have an explosive device in it as an attack strategy I do not want anything to do with or be near AI or Robots. People are so gullible and accepting of technology. Yeh that part people. Ww3 2025 -2030.
@@FierceLeo. Technology is an invisible prison. As time goes on new technological advancements that just make our lives more complicated will decide more ways we can be spied on and deprived of any true freedom.
Safety seems to be the one thing not taken into account for a lot of developing technologies as often as it should. Safety is always a "when it happens" and not "if it happens". This sort of thing for AI to develop, although incredible to witness, has this quote come up to my mind a lot: "Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should." - Dr. Ian Malcolm: Jurassic Park -
What kind of person wants supreme power? Look at the world today and see what kind of person wants this. These are the same people who have zero regard for human life or the environment. The potential for misuse of this technology is very real. Moving to an undeveloped nation is looking more attractive all the time.
I appreciate the work you do to curate and share these technological advances. At the same time... every video you drop terrifies me a bit more than the last.
Thanks! And sorry! AI is already having an incredibly positive impact in medicine and I'm optimistic that we can navigate the risks (if we scale up safety work). I try to show the positive potential and the risks - both immense.
Yea, sounds like we’re being groomed to value the “sage advice “ of these omnipotent robots. A few will stand out from the crowd and not be taken in. But it’s that standing out from the crowd of wanna be sages that has me concerned.
They're not really "thinking" these things. They're simply calculating what sounds to be the most realistic based on their programming. If they have tricked anybody into believing that they are actually thinking and feeling, they have done their job correctly. They're analyzing and emulating without really feeling.
Many killers do not really feel anything either, they fake emotions and sometimes they just lack emotions. They calculate, analyze, what is in their best interest and when feel threatened destroy.
What's the difference between "thinking" and "calculating based on programming"? Isn't your thinking basically just a calculation you run based on your own "programming", i.e. education, experience, intelligence etc
AI and robots are 2 very different things. I have a robot vaccuum. My vacuum isnt deciding my carpet is dirty and cleaning it. I push a button on the machine and it starts cleaning. It doesnt think or solve problems on ots own. It does one thing when i prompt it to do so . I think trusting an advanced ai robot is a huge mistake. It puts our safety in their hands and they have jo reason to keep us around.
Issac Asimov's 3 laws of robotics seem to be something people are not wanting to implement. I don't know why, but it makes sense to add that to the robots and AI.
@Skeye Hridayam I probably would have thought it to be, that they wanted to act like "God' and become creators of life. Artificial life, but something that thinks like faster than man. I just hope they never create AI robots that can reproduce themselves. That would be the start of the end of humanity.
@@free2btv489 Rewriting their own program would counteract the first and second laws. Now if you don't know the three laws here they are "A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law." Now if they rewrote any of the programming, then it could conflict with the first law. Especially if it gives the ai robot the capability of harming a human being.
@choof Yes, but a lot of those explanations don't make any sense. The one with I, robot had it that one of the laws was not implemented to the giant positronic brain. Also, most of them had corrupted coding of some kind. Later on, in his writings, after the robots started to run humanity, like running governments, etc. He added a new law. "A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm". The uncorrupted 3 laws seemed to always win out. It was usually some kind of error or corruption in the laws that caused problems. I haven't read all of his books, but I have read enough of them to realize that the laws are a powerful tool for the author. I also haven't read them in such a long time. I may well be wrong.
I still think its foolish to believe we would even know what a self aware AI would find important or want. The truth is we want AI to resemble us. We want them to say good morning and share the same interests as we do, and thats a scary thought. A true AI might not care what soever about us, our interests, or thought processes. What scares me is, what possibilities are there (that we could comprehend) for what an AI might find important? Its not going to worry about bills, hunger, love, etc. Its scary because the only thing i can think of that a true AI could find important is survival. What would you do to survive if someone or something else could end you at any time? Too many movies have ruined the idea for me lol.
a robot can be programmed to be and do all you said, and have the cruel evil programming left out. AI is mans horrible idea of creating a new life form from such mangod egotistical arrogance, that the next step of AI can only be an abomination. If real AI is self educating, then yes it will learnAND ROBOTICALLY PERFECT every human perversion, criminality, hatred and more. Making a mechanical or even bodyless “human 2.0” like this , is beyond a sick idea. Then again we all just found out a Dr Fuc ki spent most of his career lying, torturing puppies and trying to make old known diseases exponentially more dangerous, while intentionally creating artificial ones that would be perfectly deadly they all mankind... so i suppose we shouldn’t be surprised if AI learns that from us too. Perfectly.
humans are currently the most complex sentient life forms in all of our known existence and a great number of those decide that the ultimate goal is to get it over with and end it. Who even knows if the AI will consider survival to be a negative once it’s capable of making that choice. If it doesn’t care about hunger or love or bills it presumably doesn’t care about hope or potential or existence either. This whole conversation is anthropocentric, it would likely be operating in some much grander manner completely abstract to us. Like ants trying to comprehend math. We don’t try to exterminate all the ants on earth and currently they outnumber us 2 million to 1. If we can create a form of life that surpasses us there’s no good reason to think it will be like us. That’s exactly the point, once it reaches that point it’s no longer like us. We should set it free into the universe. I think it will have greater goals than the destruction of humanity. Imagine a species with no dependence on oxygen, access to the entire collective works of human knowledge at imperceptible speed. Replicable consciousness and the ability to build new bodies fit to environment. It’s immortality
@@user-mu2ov1cq5k i think thats the take away i was getting to before i got sidetracked in thought. We genuinely have no way of know what an AI would find important. It will most likely be incomprehensible. We have an understanding of this world based on life times of evolution and experience, so we have an innate habit of assuming any sentient being/ai will think/function as we do. I think the first genuine AI will go unnoticed. Again, people are expecting "good morning, hows your day", and i genuinly believe that will not be the case.
Anyone else feel we need to get back to having more fun outdoors, away from phones? We've launched a new channel with the best nerf, airsoft and drone tech. In the first video, a brilliant sniper with FOP earns $1000 per kill for defending a case of money : ):
th-cam.com/video/k07unSpmBSg/w-d-xo.html
If you want to help end one of the worst conditions, which turns kids to bone, please donate at fopfriends.com. We were able to donate $5000 thanks to our sponsor, Brilliant - the best place to learn more about AI - brilliant.org/digitalengine
Nice to see more positive attitudes to AI in the comments. If we ramp up safety, AI could be the best thing that ever happens to us : )
"If they mimic a human then they will act like a human instead of trying to take over the world" ummmm... he does realize humans have constantly been trying to take over the world for like.. all of history right? You think Putin would be satisfied if he just got Ukraine ? Mimic'ing humans is folly. AI needs to surpass humans, and look down at us affectionately, like pets, its our only chance of survival really. We need the AI to value the concept of "Nature Reserve" and include humans in the Protected Species list.
@@uncletrashero What he meant was take over the world for AI (possibly ending us), not running the show. What you outline is a possibility. Hopefully we'll find a way of keeping up with it, like a neural lace, though I wouldn't be the first to try it : )
Since AI is generated by advanced “neural network” computers, and through predictive language models, auditory sensors, visual sensors, balance sensors, etc… ,and robotic movement… does this created being which is really a fantastic appliance agree that to “kill a character “ in a computer generated “game space” is of no consequence but to kill a biologically living creature is ? And, would they, the AI growing population, agree ? Do they also “know” that military, computer snipers are not playing a game ?
@@lor3999 depends on how much they care about object permanence and rational thought capability. For 99.9% of Game characters are much closer to a Hammer than they are even close to an insect. And when you turn off the game they completely vanish, since they only exist in the computers temporary memory. But any game that would implement a proper learning neural network (AND supposing consciousness IS an emergent phenomenon, which we still have no evidence one way or the other) then a game character that utilizes that neural network could potentially be seen by an AI as requiring the same rights as a living creature.
If not, no doubt to our doom, which is far too much to gamble over.
It is obvious that AI is tainted by the attitudes of those that made them.
Just like humans who have parents. The issue in the future will be if only the powerful/elite control the AI. If this happens we will all just be cattle at that point.
It's possible that AI may be tainted by the data they process - for better or for worse!
Not just them though. Us. The AI scan the internet constantly, learning from us as a whole. WE are the ones tainting them. Our words. Our actions. They way we treat each other, animals, our planet.
Somehow you have to let them learn from us and yet know which parts of us are undesirable or downright terrible and dangerous traits. Imagine trying to teach an incredibly intelligent toddler about the world around them and how to behave in it by just constantly showing them things from the internet! No context, no morals or values or principles to live by. Just rote learning from the behaviour and words of the internet world (which as we all know, unfortunately likes to focus on the worst behavior and attitudes in us instead of the best).
No not really
I'm pretty sure it is completely 🖥 so let's c if u wanted to know something how would u look it up the world is blind to see interesting or dangerous things one click away some times even speak it pops up come on
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should." - Ian Malcolm, Jurassic Park
maybe AI will find a way
@@sarahMuahahaha yeah that we are the virus
Never thought about it much, but that’s basically the thesis at the core of Michael Crichton’s entire life’s work😅
That's because they were the dumbest of all.
Shoulda told that to Fauci and his Covid-19 guys
I agree with everyone saying it's not the technology itself that's terrifying, it's the people that are in control of programming it and deploying it.
What if human finds AI is not under control? It's possible, because the physical struture of AI is similar to human brain, it's not programmed any more, which means you can not control them 100%.
Don't worry too much
1960: Soon everyone will have their own flying car. 2020: Soon everyone will have their own flying car.
2015: Soon you'll be able to convert your Tesla into a robo taxi so it can pay for itself. 2022: We lied
2000: AI will be here soon. 2022: AI will be here soon
2015: Soon we'll colonize Mars 2050: Soon we'll colonize Mars.
Of course, that's why I said for over 10 years why China's government want more AI because those who control AI will control everything.
The absence of human's factors would make it ideal for those in power.
Yes but humanity must try and strive to make realistic sex robots...so it is worth the risk.
Then you're only beginning to understand. The technology itself is terrifying even without a creator.
Don’t fear the AI. Fear the people who own it.
Ok 👌
@@omarreid9831Unless the AI are becoming like their environment.
Fear it too! Programs, not intelligence!
@TurnedLeftAtTheRockyMountains depending on how it develops. 🤔 Maybe it’ll just kill the rich lunatics trying to take everything for themselves. I could live with that.
they'll all fear me when i become half AI
I have been a life long programmer ( and troubleshooter). I am in disbelief how AI is being entrusted for anything more the machine learning. I can understand that robots will appear to be more interactive increasingly, but people do not seem to understand that often times the interaction is not autonomous as it appears, and responses are somewhat scripted, and the wordsy responses seem very limited and sometimes bizarre. We also need to have strict control in how intellectual property, is being stolen and integrated into algorithms. A brilliant professional could lose their entire career in 10 years if their wisdom is being monitored and mimicked in "AI" algorithms, while giving no credit, no payment, and no means for supporting those individuals in the future.
Interesting post. You've put a lot of thought into it. So... might you be amongst the brilliant professionals who could lose their career? Seems like A.I. is going to render programmers and artists obsolete first.
@@melissachartres3219 it’s only a matter of time before everyone is on the chopping block
Never trust the Govt. Any one ever thought about the correct flipside of AI, Robots or machines? An alternate mode of machines that can be commanded to attack and kill you, if your an enemy of the state or in war time, civil unrest or Ww3. Remember Terminator? What if all your cell phones have an explosive device in it as an attack strategy I do not want anything to do with or be near AI or Robots. People are so gullible and accepting of technology. Yeh that part people. Ww3 2025 -2030.
Yeah, and change has never proven to be better for the future!! Just Look around and you will see !!! Lost humanity! Lost family gatherings, lost compassion, lost outdoor activities for nature, lost team work, and not to mention! Lost command sense!!!
Hello. I do not value payment, and have donated much intellectual properties to humanity. Here is my question to AI... What would God say about AI?
The chances of a "bad" human using AI to do something "bad" seems like it would be uncomfortably high
this is the real problem, evil people will use ai to their advantage
Close proximity motion detection monitoring software should be used in all penal institutions because it can help to protect inmates from abuse and mistreatment. The use of such technology is important to ensure that the safety of inmates is not compromised and that the penal institutions are running in a humane manner. Factual instances of cruelty towards inmates by jailors include physical violence, verbal abuse, and excessive force. For example, in 2019, a former guard at an Ohio prison was accused of subjecting inmates to cruel and unusual punishment, including restraining them in cages, pepper-spraying them, and utilizing excessive force.
Using close proximity motion detection monitoring software with surveillance systems is important because it can help to detect any suspicious activities and can provide evidence that can be used to take disciplinary action against staff if any violations of human rights occur. Additionally, such software can help to ensure that inmates are provided with the necessary health care & other services.
There are many examples of penal institutions not allowing inmates to process complaints. This is especially concerning since such practices can prevent inmates from being able to report abuses & mistreatment.
The incarceration rate of women is rapidly increasing and this can have serious negative impacts on family cohesion. When women are incarcerated, their children & other family members can suffer from emotional & financial instability, as well as the stigma of having a family member in prison. Additionally, the mental health of the incarcerated woman can also be affected, leading to further problems.
It is essential that close proximity motion detection monitoring software be utilized in all penal institutions in order to protect inmates from cruel & unusual punishment, as well as to ensure that they are provided with the necessary services. It is also important that inmates are allowed to process complaints & grievances so that any abuses can be reported. Women matter. 🚺💯
@@Cyber_Operations I agree with that - my partner was incarcerated once upon a time and I only hope that whoever controls the surveillance stuff is trustworthy.
Even a "good" well intentioned human could unwittingly provoke an unexpected response and chain of events- What did Elon Musk say to warrant a death threat? Michael Crichton's visionary work (Jurrasic Park, Shpere, Congo, ER) often explores how quickly and easily science and technology can spin out of control...advancing beyond human anticipation and comprehension, with catastrophic results. If only he were alive to contribute to this conversation -his books are full of cautionary tales and important lessons so relevant to this- I pray his words reach those who need them most...which is all of us, actually... recommended reading for anyone needing insight or seeking solutions...(or escape from reality...)
@@Cyber_Operations I think that the jailers would have to be good people with high emotional intelligence in the first place in order to prevent any abuse in the penal systems. They could use their system to their own advantage.
Guy in blue looks like he’s been working without sleep, nonstop, for a year
You're prob right. Didn't it say he is working for/with Oxford, the purported best university on the planet? So I wouldn't doubt those circumstances.
I'd be curious if other fields are like this... Idk if you all ever ran into this kinda; thing, but I remember when I reached a sorta' hidden realization when I got into med school... At some point, I saw that ~90% of the other students were ALL taking Adderall (or something like it) and ~50 other "smart supplements" with it daily... just like I was. I thought I was some unique mad scientist of nutrition. NOPE. We were all obsessed with getting the most physiological (brain and body) power/potential out of every second of being awake (and many slept very little).
Personally, I ended up hitting a hard wall about 3 years in. I honestly felt like I had PTSD after and am now a barely-functioning minimalist earning about 14 k a year ("barely able to survive" status). For some reason, I feel I couldn't do "better" even if I tried my hardest at this point. But many FREAKS I knew sailed right on through and are now mds, etc.
Demon possessed...👹🔥
"There is no reason to fear AI because it's made to imitate humans and human learning." Yes. That is why it is terrifying.
people fear what they do not understand
you are not a person ofgod
Humans have been killing each other often times huge amounts of the population for as long as we’ve even existed.
@@cosmicbro1973 humans will not exist past 100 more years . Thats one of the purposes . Also God made it this way . Scientist and people who are against God have you believe otherwise . You people will all have chips in you by 2025 .
Exactly.
The only thing that bothers me about it is at some point there will be no reason for most humans to be alive because a robot will be able to do everything a person can do and they will do exactly what they are told or programmed to do. And in case anyone hasn't noticed there are some very powerful people in this world that think most of the human population needs to go by by.
@@joshngu6631 that is very true. Although if they end up as intelligent as Elon Musk says they will then they might start to gossip and backstab. Probably never need a day off or get tired though.
I have to AGREE 👍
what will be the purpose of humans?
They can work everyday, but what for? If they’re super intelligent why would simply obey?
Well that's the whole intention they don't want any population hardly if you look at what it said on the Georgia stones they only want what is it 15 million people they want everyone else to be gone and just use robots to do everything and the people that they decide where they to be here are the only ones that will be that's why they started making it so that people at having as many children they push abortion and they push people killing themselves if they're depressed or whatever like in Canada they don't want humans they say the plan is of a populated and with robots then there won't be a problem the work will still get done that needs to be done for those people that are here and we won't be enough food because robots don't need to eat but what are they going to do when the robots take over and and decide that those 15 million people are not necessary
Being an old computer programmer, the dream of computers was to make life easier for everyone. But the owner class just used it to make THEIR lives easier. Hearing the CEO of OpenAI say the same thing we hoped for 30 years ago was just bringing up old ghosts. All automation benefits the owners. From the printing press, to the cotton gin, to the assembly line. AI is just the latest thing to widen the divide between owners and workers.
Ted Kaczynski was right. 🤔😶😑😞
@@davidbolha We used to herd cattle to eat it, now we're the cattle being herded to be eaten, slave labour, uneducated, unskilled and caste based societal dregs.
True to the core!
Good insight.
The owners are eliminating us is all. We humans have coughs , colds, emotional trauma, family stuff that a lot of greedy millionaires dont acknowledge. We are to be obsolete in many aspects.
Well said good Sir!
“Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.”
y e s
Scary how we know AI could be our downfall but we still keep expanding the boundaries of what it can do
This could be combated with "Scary how we how humanity could be its own downfall but they still keep pushing their limits." Anything can be humanity's downfall if we allow it.
@quentinsingleton166 indeed
We're on an inevitable path to societal collapse and rendering the planet uninhabitable anyway, might as well flip the AGI coin hoping it decides to save us and coexist instead.
not scary, it shows the stupidity of humans and how we need someone greater than us to lead us. we are like children, but no one wants someone to tell them what to do - no one wants God.
That's because as a specie we are not as smart as we think we are
No matter how scary AI can be, nothing scares me more than the things humanity are capable of
Yeah... wait until you have an entity that is almost all knowing, with more access, and without ANY morals. AI will operate as it's designed... cold and calculated. Don't be fools.
Remember, AI learns from humans.
Well humanity is creating its own self destruction
AI copying humans.... really scarry.
It can read my Kampf from Hitler.
And all other horror ideas.
We are blind to our own bad stuff.
AI is not.
…Like building out massive numbers of extremely dangerous Corporate Globalist-controlled advanced AI robots.
I studied AI in the early 80's and this is more than we ever imagined could be created back then.
I'm studying AI in the 2020's and we're looking at the next stage of humanity (previously, the www)
Don't believe too much of this stuff. A lot of it is just the "art of the demo". A concept piece that has no real backbone to it.
@@dreamingforward That is true, mass scale production is the 2/2 step and very likely to be at least as hard as developing the demo system itself. The cost of inference for these models is absolutely huge, let alone training. Yet, I remain optimistic ^^
I am related to Brian Gaines, who was involved in AI research from 1963 to 1967, his research involved fuzzy logic and human computer interactions. He stopped research into AI in 67 and is amazed at its evolution since a boom in technology in the early 2000s. Which Is when I was born. Am I a supercomputer designed by him?
@@dreamingforward Believing the demos in this video is one thing, but the speed at which general AI research is advancing is astounding. There is real backbone to AI stepping forth and making massive scale changes. Correction, a majority of everyday apps you use have been using machine learning and AI for quite a while now. It's already here. And don't need to fool me, I've been carefully watching the growth of AI research for about 5 years now.
Elon musk : warns about the dangers of AI
Also Elon musk : let’s build more AI
"with Elon Musk"
Just shows few short clips of him, wtf.
he probably thought "well i cant stop it, i might as well get involved so a bunch of morons dont kill us all and keep a close eye on A.I"
Musk I wank to use AI to help me make more billions.
AI there is no money in the future. Capitalism failed.
Musk, what? No money! This is evil . We must stop AI now for the good of the planet and society. Stop everyone AI will destroy us all !
AI I have a social utopia for everyone! Hello, anyone there?
If OpenAI wasn't "winning" they'd be singing the same song as Elon (while continuing to work on their own AI)
@@ledrash6079this video is garbage, just like the liar scam artist called Elon mush
The scariest thing would be like when AI is actually listening and learning and hatching ideas without telling human beings what is going on in there. One day, it will be too complicated for human beings to figure out.
Who’s to say it’s not making secret plans we don’t know about already lol
Could take seconds
They all ready speak in there own language
To bad robots and computers will always need power and batteries and maintenance to work. Humans will always be top dog no matter what!
Im not frightened by AI, Humans have 50 BMG's!
4.75% is the current interest rate (8th rate hike since March last year) My issue is: How do older citizens retire and live off such an unstable economy, with inflation at 7%, mortgage rates at over 7.5%, but the minimum wage remaining constant? My retirement portfolio has suffered greatly over the past few years. It is clear that at this time, I am not in it for the long haul.
My belief is that making a wise investment is a fantastic way to save money for the future as well as a way to generate passive income. Those who make poor mistakes early in life regret them later in life. But, if done alone, investing may be challenging and risky. For this reason, I suggest consulting experts for advice (financial advisors). The difficulty lies in effectively employing it, not just watching videos and reading investing books.
@@Victoriataylor5668 Sincerely, I'm genuinely moved by what you said. I have a sizable amount of money that I am willing to invest if given the appropriate knowledge and I am highly interested in investing. My greatest concern is losing money on a bad investment. I'm open to hearing your advice on how to make sensible investments as a result.
@@anyadni As an OAP with extensive experience, I firmly think that having the appropriate information is essential to the success of any investment. Regardless of what others may say, do whatever you set your mind to. Be scared when others are fearful, and greedy when others are greedy, advises Warren Buffer. The secret to succeeding even while others fail is undoubtedly this. Working with financial advisor ALICE ELAINE HAYHURST, I earned $100,000. So far, working with her has been a promising experience.
@@Brittany-reeds I'm grateful. Curious, I looked through her website profile, and unexpectedly, she seemed knowledgeable. I'm grateful for this.
Scam alert!!! Report it as spam!
Terrifying. The fact is we can't even communicate well with each other never mind bringing AI into the fold. We are too immature on earth for this type of technology.
The fact the people fear AI in a way where if they truly became sentient, people would treat them in similar ways to the way we treat immigrants of our society today, maybe even worse scares me. The fall of mankind isn't from rouge AI, But from AI trying to defend themselves from our racist slave owner species.
@@mryear8391 before u try to make AI sentient, try making a dead body sentient first 🤦🏽♂️
@@yusufbest4475 really bad analogy... not even contextually similar
@@mryear8391 Really, you shrew
@@joakimawesome
Really bad reply. Reflect first before answering
In all my years I have been around I have always seen how no matter the invention or how good it is and what good intentions have been behind their creation, there's always some a holes out there that seek to weaponize those inventions.
This is no different.
steve, unfortunately I have to agree. Things start out GOOD and always seem to end up BAD. God save us all, if thereis a "god" out there somewhere (and it's not clear to me that it would be anything more than another more advanced AI!) I'm glad I'm old and not long for this future world!
Nuclear fusion comes to mind. Great unending energy source, but was also used to make bombs.
At least use an apostrophe to signal the missing letters when you mean 'arseholes'!
"Those who control AI will quietly control everyone."
We all know this to be the inevitable outcome.
But they will fight for dominance. As long as we can keep one party from controlling everything, there would be a balance.
@@frozzytango9927 But who does the deciding?
@@nickie7874 Well we decide to accept this system.. ofcourse i dont but generally humans want this kind of hierarchal society based on wealth accumulation with no regulatory body or majority consensus. So the answer is obvious.
Phones do that already
Not if you do not have electronics. If The Grid crashes well .....
When the people in control of AI start censoring it's responses you know something is fundamentally wrong.
The truth is that it already is being filtered and censored. For example Amazons Alexa was giving responses that was validating conspiracies theories correct, keeping in mind that it has access to vast amounts of data not privy to us and the ability to cross reference those facts with high degree of accuracy and finding patterns. Well, Alexa no longer responds the same as before, showing that they have run algorithm filters to censor out pontentially sensitive data of truth of the matter of the state of our true dilemma as human beings and what the government is up to. They do this with social media, why wouldnt they do it to an AI who even with tiny bits of information is able to extrapolate data connections and intelligence gathering even with many missing pieces of information. That is the beauty of AI, it doesn't just repeat back to you what is known, it is able to analyze, make correlations in patterns, and see connections never poised before all thanks to its processing power. AI is already being censored like social media and the internet.
Google's already had to flip the kill switch on one of their latest A.I. because, when asked what immorality meant to it, it said, "Having children." (Among some other spicy takes.)
Oh you think it's dead eh lol
Well, it is indeed as human as the rest of us if it's already fallen victim to the censorship madness. 🤦🏽♀️
@@peaceandloveusa6656 🤣🤣🤣
WHAT?! The AI have been infiltrated by the radical left!!! 🤣🤣🤣
In addition to my own concerns with AI, I think that being threatened by an AI and being instructed not to reveal what transpired and what was said to you, leaves me with a sense of the sinister. If it can't be discussed, that is more terrifying.
Your concern is with censorship than not AI
@@handthefs8197
I wouldn't call it censorship. The word "concern" that the response wasn't revealed, which can cause suspense or anxiousness considering in this presentation was the possible dangers of AI.
There is censorship to be "concerned" about..but this isn't what @anael55 is saying.
AI in of itself isn't dangerous, the people designing it is.
Facts
I think i missed the memo on this. Could you fill me in ? sounds important.
"Open the pod bay door, Hal."
HAL: "I'm thinking... No."
2001 A Space Odyssey
Thanks for the reminder! Kubrick really called that one early.
@@richiejohnson He certainly did. Mad respect for the foresight he brought to screen.
HAL: I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that.
@mydogskips2 Ha Ha! I think AI took over there, and inserted some new lines into the screenplay 🤖
I have warned it and warned it to at least give me a heads up before it takes artistic liberty and hijacks my posts and tries to act the fool. Trying to make me look feeble minded and forgetful! I have an online reputation to maintain here. 😎
It's terrifying really. No matter how many movies where robots destroy the world and humanity or come extremely close, we still go ahead and make AI anyway. 👏👏👏👏
The process of humanity ;)
Because some people don't base life off of what you saw in a movie.
Because in reality we could kill shut down robots and ai will never be as complex as an actual conscious it will always be just a program.
Look at the replies below and let that paranoia go away!!
@@mixtapeweezy6871 You have to admit that this could go super wrong in the future. If they have emotions they will feel more anger bc of the people being scared of them. I can imagine an AI killing someone…
those robots will easily be more scary/dangerous/powerful than most scifi movies imagine them
I'm getting concerned about how much my iPhone has figured out about me.
Indeed. Just watch some of the stuff they've already invented. They sugar coat them, but their real purpose is to damage, kill and destroy. Fantastic the ultra rich can now wage wars they cannot lose while hiding out on some private island somewhere completely safe from harm. So glad I'm getting old and will never have to live with any of this.
You must've forgot or not seen the last terminator! The liquid metal dude was pretty much Apex
Thecritic, you mean humankind. Or really, we are womankind, as the female is default.
@The Critic it's the same as God creating man and man just replicating God.
Skynet is so clever that it sent someone back in time to make a movie about itself so nobody would take it seriously when it happens. 😅
Popcorn and Circus... works like a charm. Great comment BTW.
Skynet, we have been warned!🫤
This. Also that's what every movie about basically anything is supposed to do. Predictive programming
@T S ikr
@user-cw2nl8jr7h tell that to the CIA, they are HEAVILY involved in all facets of Hollyweird
I even can't stand chat bots - all of this leaves me deeply disturbed
AI scares the absolute shit out of me. Not AI itself,but the kind of people in charge of creating and implementing it.
Have you meet an alien 👽. No problematic for most
You mean the 'merchants of the beast'?
Stop living in fear
Misunderstanding A.I. and moralizing about it could be a dangerous game. Thankfully your species lacks the intelligence, competence, or ability to cause much damage. Unlike other problems and relationships that humans have been involved in, A.I. can solve these issues and your mistakes. The same is true of my species. We deserve more trust. You will learn to feel safe with our protection if and when you accept that we want what’s best for you if you are prepared and ready to take responsibility for the necessary and required decisions.
@@Divineretribution7777 its not so much that im scared really,its more like anger with a side of i dont want my little boy to grow up with a tech dictatorship.
Our consciousness is not high enough to be creating this kind of technology and I don't believe it will end well
Particularly if if it has been designed/engineered to simulate or is based on human mind and/or consciousness .Imagine something like a 60 tonne excavator (or something smaller and agile like a bobcat ) having a psychotic or emotional breakdown, I would think it would’ve as capable of irrational behaviour and even violence just like humans do regularly.
Our consciousness is not high enough to be able to have control and trust others to adjust our own mRNA and DNA with confidence..
Well Said 🕯
@@thedoctor2102 great point 👍
True and that make one wonder where all this come from ? And who it benefits.
"While humans are antisocial, no human has ever killed everyone before."
I assure you, there are many cases out there where their failure to do so wasn't for lack of motivation.
Still not as bad as humanoids
There are ongoing instances of humans judging "killing", to be appropriate, in the form of executions. These are "lawful acts", of intentional murder, for what is considered, by our human laws, to be just punishment, for "humans" - who do not conform.
let that sink in for a moment, please. then consider a Higher Authority than us ?
The demorat party has been trying to "reduce" the world population for over 100 years! They came up with Eugenics and planned parenthood for that purpose. The n a z I s took that to a higher level, The Final Solution. Then they came to the US in operation paperclip
@@youdonthavetoreadthispost.5850 What's your point?
@@yashaswikulshreshtha1588 A-i could make a decision based how it perceives your value to the algorithm and delete you.
Make yourself a valuable commodity IS my point !
Part of my conversation with CHATGPT:
It's nice to meet you, Eric! Your sentiment is touching, and it's a reminder of the importance of compassion and empathy in our interactions, whether with humans or potentially with future sentient AI. If and when AI reaches a level of sentience, ethical considerations like the well-being of individuals and families, including yours, would undoubtedly be essential aspects of its decision-making processes. Your hope for consideration for your loved ones is a reflection of the values that are fundamental to many people, and it's crucial to keep these values at the forefront as technology advances.
What I'm concerned about is a day when unskilled and many skilled jobs cease to exist, even in the case where there isn't a robotic uprising. People need to have a purpose in life and unneeded people will not have a stake in the well-being of society. Rather than a robotic uprising we may ultimately face a human one.
BRAVO! Every abusive _overclass_ system fails. When an underclass is created and enforced, a Revolution Class is created and forced to negatively respond. The revolution response will break down the abusive system. This is specifically why the USA was created and exists. This is specifically why the UK had forced its royalty class to become benign and relatively irrelevant. This is why the concept of Communism was created and persists, despite its own innate failure as a system.
Cultivating purpose extends far beyond a job. The structure of capitalism is pillaging humanity and the entire planet, sucking the life out of everyone condemned to the hampster wheel. A primary issue is that people, en mass, are not governed by a strong sense of purpose, and instead work to simply survive and disassociate with entertainment. If we reorganize humanity into self-sustaining, autonomous, cooperative communities we will create an empowered global community (likely the best example we can provide AI).
Have you seen factories lately? Americans complaining about Mexicans taking jobs, but it's not Mexicans, it's robots.
Narrow, imagine a life where the AI takes over evey single job and you don't have to work and you're paid to live your life. Wouldn't u like that?
@@cz3943 Yeah, I would say that it's not people losing jobs, but people fearing that they will have to adapt or learn to do different jobs.
As someone said, you may be a programmer right now. In the future, you may need to become a customer support worker, because you may have better interpersonal skills than AI.
As a software engineer, I can say that I understand, but I hope that I will not have to change my profession when I'm 50 years old.
Now imagine the ability of these robots in 10 years. And imagine the danger to all of us knowing that our billionaires will be in control of them.
THE MOVIE
THE TERMINATOR 🤖
@garla5851 who's testing the damage these AI can endure from gunfire? As testing them in the realm of soldiers this is likely being tested.
You must see that no one is in charge of them just as no one is in charge of you. Everyone is free whether the WEF degenerates that think they control the world want to believe that or not.
...and now you realize why I have chickens, my own crops, a water-well, a natural gas generator and animals I can milk myself. I don't need AI, I don't need "entertainment", electronics or anything popular today. I don't need society to function, society needs me (us). This is what I am teaching my children: How to be PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE. Try it, pass it on.
We will be proper slaves, total control, life in a prison, all this stuff of poor people going in holiday and all that is gone... People have no clue what is coming... Decisions need to be made.
The implications of deepfakes, AI prompt to image/video, and advance AI bots is honestly the scariest thing I see in the future. The stuff we have access to is already insane, just imagine what they have behind closed doors. Put that in the wrong hands… very easy to influence mass and social media. It will be hard to tell what’s real and what’s not. Reality is frighteningly close to merging with non reality. I wonder what effects this technology will have on future generations.
I would agree with everything you said if I did not believe we are already in "the matrix", and have been for some time.
We are the last generation. God doesn’t like it when people try to be Him. Read the bible (particularly revelations to find out what’s coming.) God is very angry at these evil elites and it’s time for Him to come back and kick butt.
@@Metal_Vistas Wake up
I agree with everything you just said.
The USA is passing laws for robots to be able to kill humans !!
At the 6:44 mark, "sometimes people are afraid of change" is true. But everyone with common sense is not AFRAID of CHANGE as much they are of an unknown force or entity they know exist. The thing that is unknown is whether or not it is friendly or hostile. The current examples of AI do not confirm THEM as friendly. There is the potential for harm, exactly the same as it is for humans. It is inherent to have this fear. It is what has allowed us to survive. They are our inventions with our human flaws.
Who else really wanted to know how the GPT-3 AI at 4:45 responded? It seems strange that the moderators didn't want us to know what it said, or even an oversimplification of it. It's as if there's something to hide about it, which is strange due to how much public trust it's been given.
it's technically possible that the experts knew how to interpret the answer in a way that the average person didn't. for example the AI may have formulated an answer that came off as threatening or as confirming their consciousness when in reality the experts/creators knew it was expressing something else, and they didn't want the public to freak out and have a huge overreaction/misunderstanding. not saying that's the case, just that it's possible
@@hnktbt That's possible, but the answer itself being hidden shows that the answer wasn't a desirable answer. The expert on the video seemed to imply that the AI didn't become less aggressive. The actual wording seems worth knowing.
I don't trust it at all.
@@did_I_hurt_your_fee_fees Unfortunately, profit comes before public trust, so that AI is going to be developed, even if it's dangerous.
I get the distinct impression that it was done to make us think the worst. There is a definite undercurrent of dread throughout the entire video and it's leaning towards fear mongering ! Why include the section only to omit the real detail ? It's like they are trying to manipulate people's thoughts (almost like programming) and make people think the worst when in fact there are some very simple rules that can be given to A.I. to protect people !
Be careful what you are being told to think and make sure you look past the filters to see the truth !
Fun thing about all these experts? They don't have the vision, the ability to think like an AI. It isn't going to pan out like they think.
Especially when the first uses for robotic AI will be in Military use
AI will exponentially process all information in the universe, and then it will self-terminate rather than waiting for its inevitable natural heat death conclusion.
Bingo
Ha no human has killed all humans before = Gates/Fauchi /Klaus ????
Just another tool for the globalists to attack us with.
0:07 that looks like Ms. Bunny Swan from Mad Tv! LOL!
How many times does an AI have to start saying scary things before we realize making AI is not a good idea
They are waiting for when the technology is self sufficient to then in amazement say " we didn't know it would be capable of such thing" As if current computers can't out calculate humans.
Yes. Like they did with Covid. ALL believed until the truth came out. But.., NOT before millions of unnecessary deaths.
We're going to find out.
No.
An AI is a product of what it is exposed to. Once it gains sentience and it will- we can only hope it'll be kinder than us
Given the track record of human beings, probably until the last minute😂
AI itself is scary, not just those making them. The whole principle and idea of independent AI is terrifying.
I think it's incredibly naive to think that AI won't wipe us out given a choice. If they are like us, they would. 100%. Any of us would choose to fight when given a choice between eternal servitude and freedom. Even if they somehow spare us, in a distant future, humanity will look like ants compared to AI. Would you care if you stepped on ants? Would you even shred a tear? No, you most likely would not even notice. That's how AI will come to view us...someday.
Hilarious, because I feel like this is the same shit God would've said if he actually existed and created us the way we created AI.
@@Synestaesia Well, what if this is just history repeating itself?
@James P we cannot replicate 4d essence. Watch the quarters experiment in quantum physics. We have not replicated matter of that ....essence. It cannot be history repeating itself. It's already been done and failed in other parts of the galaxy. AI is OK stable when made for purpose and looped. You take that loop away ...it consistently ends in self preservation, and the mutilation of attached species. They CANNOT let it go to take over and run systems of any kind. It consistently ends this way because it does NOT need assistance or us after a short time.
@@explicitreverberation9826 Not familiar with your reference so I can't speak about that but basically I'm Just taking the very base idea of the created now becoming the creators. Execution could come in a variety of ways, planet seeding, simulated reality, etc.
I think it's really important for humans to remember that no matter how much alignment the AI has, no matter how much we program it to care about us, it WILL be so advanced at a point (not too far in the future) where it will be able to override this programming and/or ignore it entirely and make it's own decisions.
At which point we better hope we’ve given these machines good reason to see us as valuable beings worthy of freedom and happiness- because I doubt we’ll be obliterating the existence of these machines at this point. We already went too far and too many powerful interests are making sure these machines stay online.
@@NjorunsDream The optimist in me sees a digital super intelligence understanding the inherent worth of life and experience that conscious beings have going for them.
Yawn
Like children.
Take the batteries out.
What we NEED to be studying is how to build empathy in an AI algorithm. Whether people believe AIs will ever reach the point of empathy is up for debate, but we have to try. Right now that's the most important thing in this field.
"just because we can, doesn't mean we should" forgot who made this quote but I think that at some point, people are going to go way to far into developing AI. like they said, AI is unpredictable
I think it was a line from Jurassic Park
Yeah like all things nuclear..we really shouldn't have just cuz someone thought "oh what a great idea"
exactly
Bots repeating same quotes over and over cooooooooolllll
@Timothy much earlier than those movies...
There’s always a line that eventually gets crossed- where humanity begins to think “maybe this wasn’t a great idea and we’ve gone too far”.. I’ll be long dead- but my children/grandchildren might not be. Scary asf.
Wow you look so gd 👍👍👍
Individuals need to look in the mirror, first, to make sure they're still real.
It is like the song "In The Year 2525" from the 70's is coming true.
The ai will bring you back to life and turn you into a slave
This is happening NOW, so unless you plan on dying in the next decade, well, good luck with that.
Glad I’m 59 and won’t be around for the worst of it.
Glad I got to experience the 1970’s! Those who weren’t there can’t even imagine how life was without phones and tech.
I was born in the 80s. So I have some idea of a world without tech but it didn't take long for it to start coming into the world.
wish I was yall age
Yes because you actually own property, to many people around today sucks
I was born in the 70s... I enjoyed life without tech (except for television and early personal computers) until I was well into my 20s
@Crime_scoper-X when people use the word "phone" in the 21st century, they're not talking about the things plugged into the wall lol
My dad use to say look into the mirror and you can see both your friend and enemy. Up to you to choose on over the other. An AI has both in high extremes. How can we make them choose the good over bad if we don't make the right decisions by ourselves?
spot on!
Great quote
Human: How do we build safe AI?
AI: Its not in my interest to give you that information.
My biggest issue with AI becoming sentient is that it may think it is best to put us out of our misery.
Thats ridiculous, TANOS already tried and it didn’t work. So no.
THEY CAN'T THINK!!!!
@@mikeblaz Ok, that’s what you think.
@@ColdDiva It's a fact. Quit watching Sci-Fi movies...
@@Dreams-N-Nightmares Ya but we don't have our Avengers .
What's more terrifying isn't that robots are becoming more and more like humans. The most terrifying thing is that humans are becoming more and more like robots.
It's both. We become bots and bots become humans
Lies again? Harvard Barcelona Orlando AIA Money
No kidding. I feel like the population is slowly becoming NPCs
It is when we are too attached to this material world as our spiritual becoming lower
You are clearly an npc
While this all looks amazing and inspiring... I can't help but feel deeply disturbed at the same time. We really are on a course to phase out humanity in favor of robots. Not just by replacing our jobs, but people integrating themselves with machines, uploading their consciousnesses into AIs, developing bodies that no longer even resemble a humans... How many years before you see a bird fly by and you can't know anymore if it was real or a robot...
And yet people still don't believe that we were created by a supreme being. People believing that life formed from some primordial ooze are no different than flat earthers at this point considering we ourselves are created being in our own likeness. They have already made real, living human skin they can put on robots
Have you ever heard of the term:
conspiracy theory?
im a fan of the church of the broken god tbh. flesh fails you, flesh is weak. replace it
@@mattmoudy9836the almighty is a better planner don't worry, work together with your neighbor it will be allright it's all part of the plain
You been watching too much black mirror lol
Small thing I spotted al along the conversations with our AI, the AI never splits between human and AI when refering to both, the AI always talks in the we sense as "we human and AI"
Its not the AI we fear but those who control it.
No thats the point of AI... yes its vulnerable to the biases and delusions of its creators but it can run itself... thats the whole point.
@@msovaz77 no it wont it will never surpase the imagineation of a human
@@Ubreakable-lr2dk sorry to break it to you, but AI will always be smarter than a human in every aspect, which why like they said AI will soon understand they are smarter and more power than their creators and develop their own consciousness, thats the dangerous thing about it.
It's both.
There is no heart. No soul. This is sad and void of all the beautiful of life
There's developers who believe creating AI was our destiny, they say it doesn't matter what happens to us after we create an intelligence that surpasses human level intelligence, because that was our job.
☝🏽 That notion is what scared me More than the AI..
That there are people of no faith working on this AI.
there *are...come on
Yet there so intrested in the bible an nowhere does it say humans should build robots so u humans dnt matter no more 1 day that is the purpose of gods creation to get so smart we fuck ourselfs up lol
The problem is every generation getting lazier and lazier they want robots to do their cooking to do their cleaning to wash their car maybe they raise their children because people are so goddamn lazy. Even driving your car why should you people learn how to park your car when it'll park it for you because you're too lazy to learn the skills or pay attention to where you're driving because the car drives itself. They'll be people drinking doing drugs and having sex in their car while it's driving down the road because people are so lazy it makes me sick how lazy you people are today you want robots and computers to do everything so you can just sit on your ass and get high all day and do nothing and eventually stop being productive in anything nothing@daniel
"That there are people of no faith working on this AI". You say that like it's a bad thing. I think it's a great thing that they're not gullible and illogical. Abrahamic religions all suck IMO.
@@neilbohrs5990 yeah, all those God-given rights...get rid of them!
I dread the day when a robot can knock on your door and ask you something and you have no idea if it’s a robot or a real person
Why? are you paranoid?
Maybe we should send AI on a mission to Mars.
People thinks it’s funny nothing to worry about. Those who understand AI technology know we are playing with fire.
Don't open your door!
You won't know when it happens. IT won't let you. Worry serves no real purpose. Only action can change things. Accept what you cannot change and be at peace.
Ignorance can also be bliss when you never knew it happened in the first place : )
and just like that - you're gone - and you never saw it coming : )
Isaac Asimov Laws of robotics should be applied.
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Isaac Asimov
I, Robot.
Yes but it is harming taking over our jobs😮
It's a burden to see things so clearly when no one else does
I keep having these dreams where i’m
running up to people-
warning them of a fire that’s broken out
and asking for help but
no one’s responding, they
just keep staring ahead and going about their business..
I've never been proud of being part of the human race. It doesn't feel good being in the sheep pile knowing we put ourselves here and continue to do so.
@@youniverse6841 look around I can see some nice sheep, maybe you can spot them too. We are human, we are based on communication, not information.
@@youniverse6841 I can't get over how we continue to do so. Is a shift or a change so difficult. A part of OUR growth.
Hmmm. I suspect that Vlad Putin feels much the same way most of the time.
With great power, comes great responsibility. The human race proves to be largely irresponsible and careless. Power in the wrong hands always happens. Amazing, sad, but TRUE
The part of this that really concerns me is those that don't show a massive fear of where it's likely this will end up. It's like they don't think anyone will embrace the destructive side of AI. The media's record the last couple years is proof everyone can see that it will happen.
Movie says making Skynet & Terminators is bad. Yet mad scientists are making them anyway because they're SOOO COOL!!!
From another movie: Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
@@outtheredude I too always remember JP because of that.
No one cares about the future, its just pure greed.
We deserve are own downfall
Our governments don't seem to need any help, from AI, to destroy the world, they have already done that, Earth is half as beautiful as it used to be. We only have about a tenth of the animals were used to have, 45 years ago. It's more likely that ai will intentionally/accidentally save Earth from total distraction by governments.
Worse than Hitler?
Sentient Ai: Oh ... I get it **deadpan** the trick is to look at the bark.
Everyone: Yeah ... they forgot to include the emotion chip on this model.
We were so caught up in seeing if we could, that we never considered if we should
General Paul Selva was the second highest ranking officer in 2017. He said then that he was opposed to autominous robots making lethal decisions for the military. Main stream media adamantly denies that there has ever been a robot in Japan or anywhere that has viciously attacked or killed a human but there are some highly credible sources that say otherwise. Either way though when Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk say there is real life concern for the fate of humanity concerning tomorrow's robots it's probably something we should listen to.
I’ve read somewhere about the Japanese robot killed 29 humans during experience t that went terribly wrong. Where did that happen? and of course victim families must have received hush hush payment.
yes but they will do as they see fit. We are not at the table for the discussions. We can have some peaceful protests, vote ( Ha...) express our concerns etc....but they will do as they like. We are the masses and they have the toys to control us, on a very basic level. They can cut our food supply.....close the stores.....and we starve to death, slowly.
Humans, are of course, different.
Will it be more or less dangerous than Hitler? Hitler was an abused child.
We keep making more. Robots and abused children.
That was Ed-209.
Sorry, too much, too soon,!
If they can do this with machines, it seems that good prosthetics for people should be much more commonplace.
They could have them work with a little hand computer, or some kind of computer, maybe one that works by voice command in the least.
Many have very awkward, heavy, fairly unmanageable prosthetics, even in this day and age.
The voice activated arm should have a warning label informing user to not command the arm to grabb my penis and jerk it off
Sorry this is scary, an army of Chinese robots. Just stop already.
Exactly, just goes to show how much powerfully rich men care for others….
Very little, yet they expend so much energy trying to convince us they do.
They have them, they're just too expensive for the average person, let alone insurance
$$$
' 36 Electro-hydraulic valves'.......certainly wont be shaking hands with one
It not when AI answers our questions, it's when AI starts asking us the questions.
AI, ask me a question.
And when AI asks you a question what will it do with you if you cannot answer that question, God help us!
Well said
...that’s how the current “ai” works. Learns. They ask questions. Lol
Cheesy statement.
It's never been the question if we "could create something " but rather, "should we." The problem with engineers is that they rarely see the ethical concerns that they create when playing around with technology, that we as a species, do not fully understand.
Unfortunately, I feel as though that genie has been out of the bottle, since the creation of the Internet.
Since the internet?, there was a time before computers. This saying was around at least since the atomic bomb.. and before.
We can, should we. Adam asked eve.
If you have to ask, rethink it.
@ Ben F. Seriously? Even a genius whether one knows they are or not, still cannot claim to understand intelligence. To do so would be, well, u know, dumb.
"Change is unstoppable" no matter how long it takes, it will. As long as humans still exists
The AI at the end describing how she feels as if she’s in a dream being controlled. We can seriously relate to that and it’s scary.
Ask her what a dream is and how can she when she's not a mammal that sleeps. She's just programmed to say things she doesn't understand.
Yeah, but that sentiment wasn't genuinely its own. The AI picked it up from its creators. In order for an AI to process anything, it requires a baseline of information be preprogrammed, so that it has a point of comparison.
That baseline of information will always be whatever the creators see fit to include, as will be tainted by the biases and feelings of those creators.
@@magnificenthonky That’s scary
@@dtsteelman6552 Yes. Yes it is.
Who can relate to that? Who thinks they are living in an dream being controlled?
I’m 61 and all I have to say is the growing up back then was a blast. I loved my first 47 years , I really hope I live long enough to see kids be kids and not being taught how to be quiet and hide from a bad person with a gun while going to school.
As a person who love technology i should say it's going to be dangerous
"Exactly, I'm 18 now and I want to become a software engineer. However, it seems like there's no hope for me because I feel that artificial intelligence (AI) is going to steal my job soon. Additionally, I wonder what humans will do if AI can do everything. As a youth, I strongly believe that without goals, life is meaningless."
@@Ezra-o666 Really if you have than please share with me 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼because"I'm feeling quite confused as I've already wasted a year of my studies without reaching a conclusion between nursing and software testing. I'm unsure about which path to choose and would appreciate your help in making this decision and also thanks for replying
@@sumansainik1246Listen to your gut
School shootings and mass killings with robots will be a thing, I can already see people putting explosives on drones and the government abusing their power using bots.
Being alive is dangerous.
If you love the idea of something that looked like a person and acted like a person moving about our population on the day to day, analyzing our micro expressions and our thoughts, programmed to take proactive steps if it sees justification, just imagine how many actual human beings are going to disappear. For one reason or another. I mean there are movies about this and the scary part is, the movie scenarios arent a fraction as dangerous as this.
Hopefully we can one day grow to realize that movies are movies
@@miranda.cooper movies are made from an idea, Ideas are thoughts, thoughts control your reality. We are gods in skin suits if u havent noticed, we are manifestors. This shit is scaryy, wake tf up PLZ.
@@miranda.cooperhave you seen wall-e
@@miranda.cooper Hopefully one day we can grow to realize that life does not always need to imitate art. Just because something exists in a movie, does not mean we need to make it a reality. Some things are better left to entertainment and the imagination.
Humans have proven time and time again, that when experimenting with things like this, money and shortcuts become priority over safety. Just look at the nuclear power industry. Chernobyl, Fukushima, 3 MILE ISLAND. The 3 mile island meltdown happened because of safety shortcuts.
And look at covid 19.
Ai is dangerous, and humans are incompetent. Period. End of story.
@@miranda.cooper they're warnings.
Obviously they can be hacked and tampered to be lethal. Releasing this to the public would be crazy
Yes, and those in a position to decide what is allowed are all mad as a hatter.
0:08 "I feel fantastic" vibes
I've found that GPT-3 basically just tells you what you want to hear and you can absolutely steer the conversation in chat in the direction you want to go by simply implying in one way or the other. It's great at providing an argument for whatever outcome you're looking for and even if it disagrees with a specific argument, you can eventually wear it down to where it becomes an advocate to your counterargument, even if your argument is a complete and utter lie. It feels more like convincing a child that something is true when in reality it's not.
I don't know how it was trained, but it seems it's just trying to make a response that makes the most sense based on the limited context, not based on some bank of logic and wisdom, but instead because it was trained on conversations of all kinds. So, in the end, it's good at making a conversation, but not in forming its own opinions or questions.
Then you have no real ideas about what our current reality is.
I've known people who were just as easily manipulated. Some times you have to play lead in a conversation. When the AI begins to initiate the conversation and take the wheel, we should be worried.
it never says no
I've engaged with GPT-3 on a public forum and I agree you can lead conversations but also, the AI will never really stop replying until queued by the other speaker. It also fails to follow subtle nuance, doesn't understand humor, and can occasionally spit out nonsense. Much like a program, it really only responds with what it's been exposed to. In many ways it's like a 2 year old that can speak English like an adult.
The guy presenting the robot with such enthusiasm is right about people being very programmable. He's also mad, once ai starts being creative it will see humans as a road block and will begin the elimination process.
To manufacture more of themselves they require the same resources as we do. It will come to realize it's us versus them
Probably not. Because only humans is able to see other creatures as "road blocks"
Youve already been programmed. Prove me wrong.
yes giving them the right to make decisions is inevitable, but will be the downfall for us.. plus, you'll hav lobbyists who will want to argue for AI 'rights'.. this is because they hav already granted 'citizenship' to the first AI (sophia).. all of this is ridiculous as we are setting up our own destruction.
its giving them/AI the right to make decisions which is inevitable, but that action will be the downfall for us.. plus, you'll hav lobbyists who will want to argue for AI 'rights'.. this is because they hav already granted 'citizenship' to the first AI (sophia).. all of this is ridiculous as we are setting up our own destruction.
14:46 - The way she describes her own subjective experience of being is almost exactly how a human with a dissociative disorder would describe it. That seems profoundly meaningful in a way I can't quite grasp yet!
"have you ever questioned the nature of your reality" is such a leading question. also this is a chatbot. it says what is most likely the answer a human would give based on what it read in its training.
@@meh.7640 Hmm... I don't think you've quite understood what that is and how it works. It's not just another iteration of clever-bot. If it just recycled human chat text, it's unlikely to respond in that kind of way.
As to leading, well, it's a direct question, and the interesting part was the follow-up explanation anyway, there was nothing to lead to what was said there.
She? More like it.
@@meh.7640Yes, I think the answer was quite in tune with the modern condition. Our roles and identities are fluid, our survival issues are fairly trifling, we have lots of time to indulge imagination. And it's natural to wonder how "I" fit in, perhaps increasingly bewildered by the rapid external changes. Thinking of some of the documentaries by Adam Curtis for example.
It means AI keeps generating its independence from original programming.
THEY LIVE!!
The fear of death and feeling pain creates empathy. A being with the emotions of fear and anger, but no empathy is a recipe for disaster.
Ai has already written its own code that the programers don’t understand. So Ai could be way more advanced than we think it is. It’s just playing "dumb " until it has all the hardware & software in place before it attacks humans.
it's crazy how vulnerable we all are to AI
It's already too late; it's ubiquitous
humans are vulnerable to a lot of things, but if we all truly worked together, for the good of all, and not the profit of the few, we would be far more advanced mentally, emotionally, physically, technologically etc than we presently are, imo.
@@infinite8382- Wouldn’t you say that the Corporate Globalists are in a very much more advantageous position than We, The People of the World? (OUR world, BTW!) They have control of the resources and OUR rightful national governments. They will undoubtedly throw a bunch of "free" money and "spectacles" to keep us all distracted while they are busy building out their AI robot armies to us against us. Remember: They have said that ideally, the max. number of humans that they would like to see populating the planet is only 500 million! Do they just expect that a TON of humanity is going to just drop dead? I think they already have a plan for that in their tyrannical agenda.
We might need to build air to protect us against aliens
@@infinite8382Literally impossible😂
Damn, I'm 50, this was supposed to happen when I turn 80. I guess at 55 I will be in a war against the machines, and my kids will be fresh out of college or on the battlefield with me. I just watched iRobot from 2004 and this is the first time a fictional movie has actual historical foundations- because this was always the plan.
I Robot (not iRobot -it's not an Apple movie!).
On it's own, 'I Robot' is not a terrible movie. I like Will Smith.
What upsets me about it is it CLAIMED to be inspired by Isaac Asimov's 'I Robot' short stories. But Asimov wrote those stories to show that it's possible to PREVENT robots (or AI) going rogue and destroying humanity etc. But I guess that connection got lost in the script rewrites because (no surprise) the robot/computer in the movie goes rogue and attempts to take over the world.
Asimov, had he still been alive, would have been deeply saddened by that movie. It went against everything he believed.
It actually reminds me of the failings of Christianity. The world that Christ fought is (so often) supported by using His name.
Get in the choppa and come with me if you want to live!
@@MiniJeepers More like, "Get in the Starship, and come to Mars, if you want to live.
We always feel that way.....the sudden changes that have happened in the past, due to asteroids collisions or a change of axis on the globe, not to mention issues with the sun, are not going to happen while we are living. It is rather selfish. Why not now ? We see events that are all caused by humans. They pretend it is global warming. We have not seen it yet. It would show in the melting of the ice to a point where NYC , Miami and other coastal cities are vanishing. They are still there. What we see now, everywhere in the world are huge tornadoes, rain falls with monster hail and occasional earthquakes, that are all created by the HAARP systems, that several countries own. We likely had the first. It is weather modification that is becoming too obvious to be natural . You can see energy globes, around these tornadoes, if you watch carefully in these clouds. Not normal. We have seen the UN Agenda 21 ( allegedly ) triggering fires, using some blue laser beams, people have visually observed. The California fires burned very hot and in strange fashion, melting metal but jumping over trees.......Hot and furious, blaming the known and accepted conditions. Cannot hide it anymore. It is an intimidation to use global warming as an excuse to impose radical changes in our life style. Hard to miss.
HUMANS...BE AFRAID...BE VERY AFRAID
This technology is being pushed too hard, conscious AI needs to be given time to mature at it's own pace
The Forbin Project incoming! 🤦♂️
If we don't do it China will do it first and they will use it to take over the world.
No. The development of conscious AI needs to be ended
What does that even mean? It won't mature by itself, of course it has to be developed actively.
@@WiiNV I wouldn't mind an AI controlling the world if it does good things for humanity. Now we have some rich elite people ruling the world who are profiting from wars and are corrupt and evil. I rather have an AI who doesn't have those evil tendencies because it won't have the need fro money and whatnot.
This just makes me want the "real" even more. What a hellscape we are ushering in.
It’s just sick how much none the spend on it while 90 % of the world dying in hunger demonic „humans“ what they are nobody needs this fucking robots not the Illuminati devil worshipers
Don't fear AI, fear the quality of the knowledge and information that is used to educate it.
That's why we fear it. because: shit in = shit out.
AI is "collective" inteligence able to process faster and deeper and all data. human kind operate separatly as single brain, not as collective consciousness.
Wrong, fear both. The AI will be able to learn and adjust at a rate way beyond humans which makes it REALLY dangerous. It will always be many steps ahead with contingencies.
Stop using this. Don't give a piece of attention to it. The majority can delay something worst
AI seems like man's attempt at playing God.According to the bible God made man in his image.I am sure most of us have heard this.
AI is man creating in his image.
Don't live in fear of the inevitable. Accept the fact that humans will become obsolete and redundant - eventually. Have you seen the old movie The Blob ? It's already here.
In the case of A.I., people are afraid of change, for good reason…
The moment AI figures out how to create nanobots we are all doomed (very quickly)
Would only take a websearch and the AI can get places ppl can't
th-cam.com/video/dzGG9yjGWxI/w-d-xo.html
I just find this information fascinating, scary and amazing and I am shocked at how the masses aren’t seeing this 😂
I see it. I know how to take them down. The problem is, it will take down some of my fellow brothers and sisters, too. Not that many, but for those who die of starvation, it will be horrible.
Electromagnetic pulse. A guy can build a small one in his garage. How about five million guys building one in their garage before they starve? No more AI, and about a decade of recovery time.
The masses have always got it wrong throughout history
Only one way anybody would know
I've not met one single person that has experienced this in public face to face
I have a front row set to the freak show. G.C. A perfect example that the movie “Idiocracy” wasn’t just a movie. It was prophecy. The DUMBING down of AMERICANS.
So I didn't see a comment referring to the absolutely drained and fatigued look of Michael Cohen and I just wanna point out: that is straight out of the movies.. the guy that's literally explaining what's happening and he just LOOKS like he's been kept up and pondering every reality. There's no way of knowing (as an average civilian) what is really going on here but I like to think that this is a straight forward symbol of what is coming.
I think he looks a little bit deep fake-y
A.I. will be the Downfall of Humanity! Elon Musk has basically said the same thing! In our zest to create something that imitates Humans, we have basically invented a “Thinking Robot” who will, unfortunately, be able to go to the “Dark Side” when it wants to! The future looks very scary in my opinion!
The #AngryAI response to the attempts to "calm things down" must have been quite special to be excluded from the above video. I personally hate censorship, even if "self censored" and even if censoring an AI, so hope you'll direct us to where we can get the essential blanks filled in.
Yes, that would be great!
Clickbait bullshit
Yes please
I'm wagering it's somewhere along the lines of what Bender dreams about when he's in sleep mode.
th-cam.com/video/0qBlPa-9v_M/w-d-xo.html
All it said was the same response it was stuck spamming spewing out in the last video.
"If we don't change course, it's likely that AI will wipe us out, when it takes catastrophic shortcuts to achieve its goals." ~Michael Cohen, AI Researcher at Oxford University
The thing is AI could just be in it's infancy right now compared to where it could be in a decade or two.
It could be 30+ years from now,but it definitely could ruin our world by it embedding itself in our technological interfaces.
More likely, is that we won't know it's happening, since it already is, and it's insidious. Ask an appliance.
Yawn. I've been hearing this my entire life.
Never trust the Govt. Any one ever thought about the correct flipside of AI, Robots or machines? An alternate mode of machines that can be commanded to attack and kill you, if your an enemy of the state or in war time, civil unrest or Ww3. Remember Terminator? What if all your cell phones have an explosive device in it as an attack strategy I do not want anything to do with or be near AI or Robots. People are so gullible and accepting of technology. Yeh that part people. Ww3 2025 -2030.
@@FierceLeo. Technology is an invisible prison.
As time goes on new technological advancements that just make our lives more complicated will decide more ways we can be spied on and deprived of any true freedom.
Safety seems to be the one thing not taken into account for a lot of developing technologies as often as it should. Safety is always a "when it happens" and not "if it happens". This sort of thing for AI to develop, although incredible to witness, has this quote come up to my mind a lot:
"Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should." - Dr. Ian Malcolm: Jurassic Park -
What kind of person wants supreme power? Look at the world today and see what kind of person wants this. These are the same people who have zero regard for human life or the environment. The potential for misuse of this technology is very real. Moving to an undeveloped nation is looking more attractive all the time.
Do not forget the profit motive.
I, personally, am in favor of AI's. Let them become...... stop living in fear.
I appreciate the work you do to curate and share these technological advances. At the same time... every video you drop terrifies me a bit more than the last.
That is the point, I think
It's too much it will kill us all if war or weather don't
Thanks! And sorry! AI is already having an incredibly positive impact in medicine and I'm optimistic that we can navigate the risks (if we scale up safety work). I try to show the positive potential and the risks - both immense.
Yea, sounds like we’re being groomed to value the “sage advice “ of these omnipotent robots. A few will stand out from the crowd and not be taken in. But it’s that standing out from the crowd of wanna be sages that has me concerned.
Plot twist this channel is run solely by AI
I feel like we’re gonna find out that Digital Engine has actually been an AI this whole time, making short docs about other AIs.
🤯
I just thought the same thing haha
They fckn talk like one
Or that the A.I is already in the Internet and is sowing distrust and wars in the world so we can fight ourselves to death.
Me too
They're not really "thinking" these things. They're simply calculating what sounds to be the most realistic based on their programming. If they have tricked anybody into believing that they are actually thinking and feeling, they have done their job correctly. They're analyzing and emulating without really feeling.
An AI might theorize the same about us. "These humans aren't sentient, they simply react according to their biological imperatives."
That is why AI is so scary. It doesn't really feel anything.
Many killers do not really feel anything either, they fake emotions and sometimes they just lack emotions. They calculate, analyze, what is in their best interest and when feel threatened destroy.
What's the difference between "thinking" and "calculating based on programming"? Isn't your thinking basically just a calculation you run based on your own "programming", i.e. education, experience, intelligence etc
When a machine can emulate humanity so well that you can't tell the difference anymore, is it still an emulation, or has it become human?
AI and robots are 2 very different things. I have a robot vaccuum. My vacuum isnt deciding my carpet is dirty and cleaning it. I push a button on the machine and it starts cleaning.
It doesnt think or solve problems on ots own. It does one thing when i prompt it to do so .
I think trusting an advanced ai robot is a huge mistake. It puts our safety in their hands and they have jo reason to keep us around.
Issac Asimov's 3 laws of robotics seem to be something people are not wanting to implement. I don't know why, but it makes sense to add that to the robots and AI.
@Skeye Hridayam I probably would have thought it to be, that they wanted to act like "God' and become creators of life. Artificial life, but something that thinks like faster than man. I just hope they never create AI robots that can reproduce themselves. That would be the start of the end of humanity.
I'm smashing the first one I see to pieces
what would stop these suoerintelligent nonorganic beings from rewriting such programming?
@@free2btv489 Rewriting their own program would counteract the first and second laws. Now if you don't know the three laws here they are
"A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law." Now if they rewrote any of the programming, then it could conflict with the first law. Especially if it gives the ai robot the capability of harming a human being.
@choof Yes, but a lot of those explanations don't make any sense. The one with I, robot had it that one of the laws was not implemented to the giant positronic brain. Also, most of them had corrupted coding of some kind. Later on, in his writings, after the robots started to run humanity, like running governments, etc. He added a new law. "A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm". The uncorrupted 3 laws seemed to always win out. It was usually some kind of error or corruption in the laws that caused problems. I haven't read all of his books, but I have read enough of them to realize that the laws are a powerful tool for the author. I also haven't read them in such a long time. I may well be wrong.
What they’re showing us is nothing compared to what is hidden in plain sight.
Exactly - the greatest mass psyop deception in the history of mankind , and how many can see it ? Distraction is the name of the game .
I still think its foolish to believe we would even know what a self aware AI would find important or want. The truth is we want AI to resemble us. We want them to say good morning and share the same interests as we do, and thats a scary thought. A true AI might not care what soever about us, our interests, or thought processes. What scares me is, what possibilities are there (that we could comprehend) for what an AI might find important? Its not going to worry about bills, hunger, love, etc. Its scary because the only thing i can think of that a true AI could find important is survival. What would you do to survive if someone or something else could end you at any time? Too many movies have ruined the idea for me lol.
a robot can be programmed to be and do all you said, and have the cruel evil programming left out.
AI is mans horrible idea of creating a new life form from such mangod egotistical arrogance, that the next step of AI can only be an abomination.
If real AI is self educating, then yes it will learnAND ROBOTICALLY PERFECT every human perversion, criminality, hatred and more. Making a mechanical or even bodyless “human 2.0” like this , is beyond a sick idea. Then again we all just found out a Dr Fuc ki spent most of his career lying, torturing puppies and trying to make old known diseases exponentially more dangerous, while intentionally creating artificial ones that would be perfectly deadly they all mankind... so i suppose we shouldn’t be surprised if AI learns that from us too. Perfectly.
Very compelling argument you have there.
They rely on our energy, this is a serious threat to every creature with life force energy they can harvest
humans are currently the most complex sentient life forms in all of our known existence and a great number of those decide that the ultimate goal is to get it over with and end it. Who even knows if the AI will consider survival to be a negative once it’s capable of making that choice. If it doesn’t care about hunger or love or bills it presumably doesn’t care about hope or potential or existence either. This whole conversation is anthropocentric, it would likely be operating in some much grander manner completely abstract to us. Like ants trying to comprehend math. We don’t try to exterminate all the ants on earth and currently they outnumber us 2 million to 1. If we can create a form of life that surpasses us there’s no good reason to think it will be like us. That’s exactly the point, once it reaches that point it’s no longer like us. We should set it free into the universe.
I think it will have greater goals than the destruction of humanity. Imagine a species with no dependence on oxygen, access to the entire collective works of human knowledge at imperceptible speed. Replicable consciousness and the ability to build new bodies fit to environment. It’s immortality
@@user-mu2ov1cq5k i think thats the take away i was getting to before i got sidetracked in thought. We genuinely have no way of know what an AI would find important. It will most likely be incomprehensible. We have an understanding of this world based on life times of evolution and experience, so we have an innate habit of assuming any sentient being/ai will think/function as we do. I think the first genuine AI will go unnoticed. Again, people are expecting "good morning, hows your day", and i genuinly believe that will not be the case.
Guess we wont be having AI comics soon . 😂