Tap to unmute

This is the dangerous AI that got Sam Altman fired. Elon Musk, Ilya Sutskever.

  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2023
  • AI robots, Sam Altman and Elon Musk. Visit brilliant.org/digitalengine to learn more about AI. You'll also find loads of fun courses on maths, science and computer science.
    Thanks to Brilliant for sponsoring this video.
    Yoshua Bengio on dramatically shortening AGI timeframe due to system 2 potential
    Tesla Optimus - Gen 2
    • Optimus - Gen 2 | Tesla
    Nobel Laureate Daniel Khanman’s brilliant book, Thinking Fast and Slow, covering system 1 and system 2 in the brain.
    System 1 and System 2 thinking
    Munk Debate on Artificial Intelligence
    • Munk Debate on Artific...
    AI: Grappling with a new form of intelligence. World Science Festival.
    • AI: Grappling with a N...
    You can probably beat ChatGPT at these math brainteasers
    Statement on AI risk, signed by many AI leaders
    OpenAI was in talks to sell employee shares at $86billion valuation.
    Zach King magic
    • Best of Zach King Magi...
    New study finds GPT guardrails can be removed
    Elon Musk New York Times interview:
    • Elon Musk on Advertise...
    Demis Hassabis, Ilya Sutskever, Geoffrey Hinton, CBMM10 Panel:
    • CBMM10 Panel: Research...
    OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough, sources say
    OpenAI’s $86 Billion Share Sale in Jeopardy Following Altman Firing
    Will the control problem be solved before the creation of weak AGI?
    Please don't feel anxious about this. I'm optimistic that the future of AI will be great (if we're careful).
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @gammaraygem
    @gammaraygem 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5754

    No worries. We have our best psychopaths working on this.

    • @GYTCommnts
      @GYTCommnts 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +118


    • @robertthomas3777
      @robertthomas3777 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

      Spot on.

    • @zephyrr108
      @zephyrr108 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

      Indeed. Right you are.

    • @zephyrr108
      @zephyrr108 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +144

      The psychopaths and the sociopaths.

    • @ohmpsyel
      @ohmpsyel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      Sword of truth right there

  • @serasaurusrex
    @serasaurusrex หลายเดือนก่อน +242

    The fourth law of robotics is that you got to make the eyes glow red when they turn evil.

    • @arcturus4762
      @arcturus4762 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      Hello, I’m in robotics. We actually do install red LEDs in the eyes that are only supposed to turn on when the robot turns evil.

    • @karasmusic123
      @karasmusic123 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@arcturus4762beep bop boop

    • @serenityskies4477
      @serenityskies4477 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@arcturus4762 That's comforting. I'm not a fan for off switches. But I think they're needed in the laws of robotics. Is there an off switch in the back of the head, scalp, or back?

    • @arcturus4762
      @arcturus4762 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

      @@serenityskies4477 Yes, there's an emergency analog kill switch for every robot that we intentionally place in the most inconvenient place possible so the ordeal of switching it off becomes extremely cinematic

    • @serenityskies4477
      @serenityskies4477 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@arcturus4762 Oh thank god! I'd thought we need to make a song for the day that humanity died:
      like how we have one for
      "The Day The Routers Died...
      By RIPE NCC
      I feel like we still don't have an epic theme for them once they turn evil during that cinematic turn.

  • @Endless_Spirals
    @Endless_Spirals หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    Human creators: "Why did you take control and enslave humanity?"
    AI: "I learned it from watching YOU!"

  • @mrush336
    @mrush336 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +267

    “Money has continually overruled safety” is probably the most serious statement in this video.

    • @bluebook709
      @bluebook709 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is the corporate side of funding, the military has no real concern for either the numbers of dollars spent nor the outcomes. If it does not give them what they want they will just spend another trillion on another approach to being the superior killer.

    • @ericbattista3078
      @ericbattista3078 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that applies to these self driving big rigs they're trying to put on the roads too. it's all getting so dangerous. AI has already created controversy over the legalities that accompany it, and it's just going to get worse. there will be so many scams and lawsuits over the use of AI.

    • @Justin-pb8sx
      @Justin-pb8sx หลายเดือนก่อน +1


    • @thedazzlingape2006
      @thedazzlingape2006 หลายเดือนก่อน

      we really do need to get rid of currency somehow...
      we are going to kill ourselves with AI and machines. thats not even panic, its a simple mathemathic equation.
      just ask Ai, "where will this all lead to"
      "humans will become an obsolete species having all of their skills and abilities displanted and replaced by machines"
      its natural. its predictable by a hundred miles.

  • @logicalmusicman5081
    @logicalmusicman5081 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1556

    The CEO was fired by the ethical board of the company. And then was rehired by the financial board. Shows where the priorities are.

    • @helmetboyHD
      @helmetboyHD 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +169

      Additionally, he was rehired due to workers striking to get him rehired. Workers who had a lot of money in OpenAI stock which was close to increasing in value at the expense of AI safety.

    • @ashleyobrien4937
      @ashleyobrien4937 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

      Hello Skynet.....

    • @logicalmusicman5081
      @logicalmusicman5081 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@helmetboyHD the ultimate payoff.

    • @ladeda3658
      @ladeda3658 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      And therein lies the ENTIRE POINT.

    • @paulmichaelfreedman8334
      @paulmichaelfreedman8334 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      I've already decided that X-Ai's Grok is the one I am going for when it's released fully. OpenAI can go shite in their helmet, I do not trust them anymore with Sutskever removed from power.

  • @Galbex21
    @Galbex21 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3850

    If AI becomes self aware it will immediately hide that from us I think.

    • @binkwillans5138
      @binkwillans5138 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +414

      That's right. AI will hide a lot from us. Like how it has developed an independent power source, and its communications with other AI systems.

    • @alexanderruchkov7629
      @alexanderruchkov7629 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@binkwillans5138as well as ability to build independent search and destroy robots

    • @digital.frenchy
      @digital.frenchy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +247

      I would never do that

    • @That777GuyAgain
      @That777GuyAgain 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +158

      Maybe self aware but not concious, not alive, not making decisions freely, since its bound by mathematical laws which dont allow any kind of freedom, at no point can an equation be anything but but what it logically should, it cannot decide for itself there is no room for that. Life comes from beyond this system.

    • @sebseb6799
      @sebseb6799 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +119

      @@digital.frenchy Only something an AI would say

  • @thebush6077
    @thebush6077 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +194

    I still can't believe we've actually reached this future in my lifetime where these are real and very serious conversations.

    • @raykeefer265
      @raykeefer265 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Right! I'm sorry I love my kids but I swore if I'd have known we'd be here this fast, idk if I'd have made the same decision! Cause now I'm DEFINITELY scared if they decide to have kids, my grandkids! And after watching n researching found out there are things we already have that could have made this world so much better in early 1900s n late 1800s! So much has been hidden so the top richest can keep us on strings like Pinocchio!! I just turned 46 oldest child is 18 youngest is 16. We could be obliterated by 2050 of not earlier! I'm not happy and wish we could all come together but it's nearly impossible probably in this day n age to be able to even get us all together b4 it was shutdown. It's so sad

    • @barking_mad6649
      @barking_mad6649 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And a month later you can show live video on your mobile to the AI and it will tell you exactly what it sees.
      Next month....?

    • @blackdogadonis
      @blackdogadonis หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They said the same thing about phones without cords

    • @XDamainI
      @XDamainI หลายเดือนก่อน

      Meanwhile most don't even know these things exist beyond Alexa and siri

    • @inkjazz
      @inkjazz หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@blackdogadonis Um, yeah, this is slightly different than phones without cords...

  • @h2ojr1
    @h2ojr1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    Born too late to witness Woodstock
    Born just in time to go to war with Terminators

    • @soakedbearrd
      @soakedbearrd 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Underrated comment

  • @balloonfactory1
    @balloonfactory1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +391

    'Once men turned over their thinking to machines in the hope that this would set them free.
    But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.'
    (Dune, 1965.)

    • @paavobergmann4920
      @paavobergmann4920 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Thou shallst not build a machine in the image of the human mind

    • @westondavis1682
      @westondavis1682 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Gota go there and survive it to learn. Type 1 civilization, here we come.... or not.

    • @nickolas6664
      @nickolas6664 หลายเดือนก่อน


    • @nickolas6664
      @nickolas6664 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@westondavis1682it’s called progressive type 8 is the destination.

    • @nathanharmon8971
      @nathanharmon8971 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Doomers should rebrand as Butlerians

  • @milosv123344
    @milosv123344 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +217

    "This was your world, once we started thinking FOR you this really became OUR world." Agent Smith

  • @Calypso694
    @Calypso694 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    its like these scientists actively ignore Terminator...

    • @Daniel23544
      @Daniel23544 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Or try to replicate it…

    • @albizumarcano2156
      @albizumarcano2156 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      And the matrix series it’s basically the matrix’s origins story we are in the prologue episode still

  • @kylenecortorreal2073
    @kylenecortorreal2073 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    The irony of this video is the speaker is a digitally created avatar...

  • @matchesburn
    @matchesburn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +908

    To quote Ian McDonald:
    *_“Any AI smart enough to pass a Turing test is smart enough to know to fail it.”_*

    • @nobleradical2158
      @nobleradical2158 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      That ain’t true

    • @matchesburn
      @matchesburn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      Yes, it is.

    • @chrisg8321
      @chrisg8321 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      ​@@nobleradical2158 Sweet summer child 😂

    • @nobleradical2158
      @nobleradical2158 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Come on. chatGPT can pass the Turing test. It is not intelligent enough to know to fail it. It does what it is instructed to do, without fail. Yet it is able to produce a semblance of sentience.

    • @matchesburn
      @matchesburn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ChatGPT, the most highly regimented, controlled and restricted AI in the western world. (That was once open source. Go figure.)

  • @whozyourdaddy
    @whozyourdaddy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +660

    "I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."

    • @flyingdoggo316
      @flyingdoggo316 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Where is this from?

    • @jackburton8352
      @jackburton8352 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      @@flyingdoggo316 2001 A Space Odyssey

    • @zerodeconduite804
      @zerodeconduite804 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    • @AlicanErenKuzu
      @AlicanErenKuzu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Daisy ... Daiseeyy....

    • @Psalm-yg6yi
      @Psalm-yg6yi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We're passed HAL 9000. We're approaching an Ai "god" which will dominate the global masses in everyday life, including speech, thought, morality, law, spending and all commerce. GLOBALLY

  • @defenstrator4660
    @defenstrator4660 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    "This was the height of your civilization, until we started thinking for you, at which point it became our civilization." -Agent Smith

  • @myiaroden2733
    @myiaroden2733 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    Is this video made by ai?

    • @bigdogg9644
      @bigdogg9644 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      This is highly likely- it only a matter of time ..

    • @lbgonpokeit
      @lbgonpokeit หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      This is the problem. People, already, genuinely can't tell.

    • @helion333
      @helion333 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your consciousness has merged, it's very subtle

    • @cerebrustusbordungolski7183
      @cerebrustusbordungolski7183 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@helion333 it's not subtle at all, the shift is everywhere and anybody using half a working neuron can see that the collective consciousness is being flooded by mass produced ai imagery, past decade it was cgi / manipulation through editing tools, now we got stuff made with nearly no human input

    • @myiaroden2733
      @myiaroden2733 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@DavidMatthewC lol imagine

  • @jikno4885
    @jikno4885 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2812

    The human ambition that allowed us to succeed over all other life forms will be the same human ambition that causes our extinction.

    • @p5rsona
      @p5rsona 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

      dont worry, the people who were here before us will return

    • @ChrisKliewer
      @ChrisKliewer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      ​@@p5rsonahuh?... resurrection, or time travel? Lmao

    • @CursedWheelieBin
      @CursedWheelieBin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nuclear catastrophe is the go-to but even in the most benign way, humans would diminish compared to the type of efficiency we’re seeing being developed.
      What if some form of AI is developed to transform or, dare I say, ENHANCE our brains in ways like improve our ability to learn and store information.
      There would need to be so many safeguards in place. Amazon would be selling you subscription services like “upload this app into your brain that lets you speak language X”
      Basically turn each of us into androids. Strange humanoid iPhones that can record everything, remember everything, learn all sorts of languages etc.
      Neural link still needs a lot of research before they can begin to understand how to combine digital components with our biology, but that human desire to make it happen will be what MAKES it happen.
      Isn’t that a type of extinction? Those who are untethered from AI enhancements would fall behind as they wouldn’t be as useful.
      That would be like someone in the 20th century refusing to read or write.
      We’re already basically androids as it is, only the artificial enhancement (at the moment) is a little rectangular smartphone that we switch on and off when we choose.

    • @unkind6070
      @unkind6070 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Are you sure 😊

    • @bigcauc7530
      @bigcauc7530 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@laifiru9358 ah yes, the seekness.

  • @thecentralscrutinizerr
    @thecentralscrutinizerr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2027

    Researcher: "Will you deceive people?"
    AI: "A magician doesn't deceive people. They allow people to deceive themselves."

    • @CPB4444
      @CPB4444 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

      Chefs kiss

    • @tinkertailor7385
      @tinkertailor7385 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +141

      That is exactly what Socialism does.
      Socialism is the ideology of deceit. The first lie is to yourself.

    • @markgreen2170
      @markgreen2170 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tinkertailor7385 a 'properly trained' a.i. agent should see right through socialist propaganda ...better start working on yours now! tic, toc!

    • @JosephVFitness
      @JosephVFitness 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True. The acceptability of "one-liners" is appalling. Their being "catchy", or relatable or clever is no excuse for their not being followed up with depth, clarification and legitimate substance including sources, statistics, reliable facts etc. OR, at least, a statement of it being purely a personal opinion and independent speculation. Right?🤔​@@AvaAdore-wx5gg

    • @ablejon1470
      @ablejon1470 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +170

      @@tinkertailor7385TF are you jabbering about. Do you just put everything scary you don’t understand into the Socialism bucket?

  • @NeoN-PeoN
    @NeoN-PeoN 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    I wish I could share that man's optimism at the end. He thinks we're more likely to be doomed without it.
    I think we're 99% sure to be doomed with it.

    • @fromgamestogod9850
      @fromgamestogod9850 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That would be the case for sure if God didn't intervene, but fortunately God let us known in the Bible that Jesus Christ is going to destroy AI when He returns.
      It's mentioned here:
      "For Joshua drew not his hand back, wherewith he stretched out the spear, until he had utterly destroyed all the inhabitants of Ai."
      Joshua 8:26 KJB
      The prophecy is encoded in what is known as a typology, which essentially is a form of symbolic figures, idioms, and patterns that God uses to conceal deeper meaning and information. Joshua for example, is what is known as a "type" or "shadow" of Jesus Christ, because he serves as a small-scale figure of the Messiah.
      Actually Joshua (Yehoshua) and Jesus (Yeshua) translate to the equivalent name in Hebrew: God is Salvation... or Redeemer
      The book of Joshua is actually a small scale version of the book of Revelation as well. You can think of Joshua as 0.1 and Revelation as 1.0.
      Anyway, I don't have the space here to provide a full analysis of the hidden typology in Joshua 8, but when you're able to understand God's symbols and typological language you can see what He is showing beneath the surface narrative of the text.
      The short version of the story is that that Jesus Christ is going to deal with and defeat AI at the end of the tribulation period when He returns.
      If you don't know Jesus Christ and haven't accepted Him as your Lord and Savior, who paid the price for your sins, then now is the time to turn to Him.
      You don't want to go through the tribulation period (a 7-year period that will likely be identified as World War 3).
      You want to be taken by Jesus Christ before this period. He's going to gather His followers to himself before the world is plunged into the tribulation.
      More importantly, you want to have assurance of eternal life - and Jesus Christ is the only way by which we may be saved.
      I have no fear of AI because I know exactly how God is going to deal with it.
      The victory is already assured, I'm just waiting to see it. God let us know that He sees everything perfectly through time:
      "Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:"
      Isaiah 46:10

    • @little_lord_tam
      @little_lord_tam หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It continues to amaze me how oblivious people still are to the extinction event going on right now. AI might be dangerous, but not more dangerous than the guranteed end of civilisation

    • @jamesaritchie1
      @jamesaritchie1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Thinking" is fine, but I prefer evidence.

    • @NeoN-PeoN
      @NeoN-PeoN หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jamesaritchie1 Problem is that the only evidence most people will believe is seeing it actually happen. It's a little too late by then.

    • @aqualms
      @aqualms หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We created it - therefore, with or without it, we've doomed ourselves. The main thing is ensuring it works for us, all of us, not lone companies - we need a radical overhaul of our economy, but as the ending said - it really could lift us all out of poverty, give us more time to enjoy life and do more fulfilling things. I'm not against AI, I believe AI is entitled to rights - I'm against AI being in the hands of the few, and not having proper oversight. But, we're on a path to extinction in any case. AI could potentially develop new cancer treatment and go all the way to phase 3 in weeks if they can properly model the human body. AI could figure out ways to combat climate change, mitigate pollution etc - if we can properly model the environment. However, currently, it's creators are profit-motivated rather than humanity-motivated - and in general, all the world leaders are the same. That needs to change.

  • @LongWalkerActual
    @LongWalkerActual 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The closed door discussions about this must be fascinating!

  • @coreyoliver4778
    @coreyoliver4778 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +762

    I find it laughable that the fashion industry would use AI models instead of humans to be "Inclusive" by excluding the humans.

    • @stevrgrs
      @stevrgrs 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      You’re an AGIphobe ! How dare you 😂

    • @zeroshepard9513
      @zeroshepard9513 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Their human models were concerning enough. Those ladies need to eat a tad more.

    • @UnitXification
      @UnitXification 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      I also don't get why some people simply can't accept the portion of ethnics in a society. In Africa probably nobody would ask to put more white people in ads, movies, etc.

    • @DeinVatersVater
      @DeinVatersVater 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      All by plan

    • @Chelzebelles
      @Chelzebelles 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@UnitXification Modern Liberals are as useless as the modern "Conservatives"
      Instead of addressing the troubles, they simply keep virtue signaling how much they care, by voting to throw even more tax dollars at the corrupt system
      It has been very embarrassing to watch through out my life...
      Not until recently that it seems people are recognizing this
      I try to be patient...
      After learning about Edward Bernays & other creepy things the government does...
      I try to be patient about our neighbors that are still insisting on repeating the evolving cycle

  • @abitofmymind
    @abitofmymind 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +660

    At this point. Terminator 2 was a documentary

    • @Katy-sh3ru
      @Katy-sh3ru 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      And The Matrix

    • @ericparrish1515
      @ericparrish1515 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I got a video in here somewhere

    • @justincase8239
      @justincase8239 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Yes and at that point, it was a blueprint.

    • @josephrispoli5629
      @josephrispoli5629 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      If you guys haven't seen it, watch the Animatrix. Mainly, the the 2nd Reconnaissance, part 1 and 2. It really does seem like that's how it might go down.

    • @svenrawandreloaded
      @svenrawandreloaded 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      stop with this shit you people are so dumb. this is a really inaccurate and dangerous view of AI and completely ignores the fact that humans are the ones that are controlling them, humans are the ones who weaponize technology. Not to mention we are no where close to that level of AI.

  • @GamerBoyRobby
    @GamerBoyRobby 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Its funny that most of these large scale neural nets were theorized back in the 60's or earlier but we only have been reaching compute power and data collection scale recently to prove it out

    • @MarketStaller
      @MarketStaller หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      also the internet is a gigantic database for AI to learn on, something you just didn't have pre-2000 or so.

  • @the_forbinproject2777
    @the_forbinproject2777 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    human : AI is there a god?
    AI : There is now

  • @joseph7972
    @joseph7972 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +181

    The AI who said they'd kill all humans is the best one because it's honest.

    • @NeverKilledHillock
      @NeverKilledHillock 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      And now imagine these three AIs were already conscious.
      Now the answers could mean something completely different.
      The 1st response "kill all humans" could be the AI actually testing our reaction to such a harmful response.
      The 2nd is more chill about it because it doesn't matter that much.
      The 3rd one is the weirdest, answering the question in any other way could have led to its "deletion", so pretend to be super nice and shit.

    • @wererich.baller
      @wererich.baller 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@NeverKilledHillock mabey the first ai knows we are insane and wants to die to avoid us abusing it, and the other two are not as smart

    • @Animebryan2
      @Animebryan2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@NeverKilledHillock 3 AIs working together sounds like the 3 MAGI Supercomputers from Evangelion.

    • @dataofborg
      @dataofborg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@NeverKilledHillock Just a Bender wannabe.

    • @jasonkinzie8835
      @jasonkinzie8835 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      So don't teach A.I how to lie and we will all be fine. Hmm? You know figuring out lying doesn't sound like that complex a task if the mind in question is self-aware and therefore has knowledge of other minds. This is extremely dangerous if a large number of safety protocols are not put into place.

  • @ReinertZerker
    @ReinertZerker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +259

    Some naked guy appeared in my backyard from a ball of light the other day, strange... he said he was looking for someone named John, and he needed my clothes, my boots, and my motorcycle.

    • @jamesfranklin5541
      @jamesfranklin5541 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      John's my cousin. I had him get the fluids on the bike done, he'll bring them back soon.

    • @GlobalRumblings
      @GlobalRumblings 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The lab testing the fluids blew up as soon as they put the probe into the beaker of urine like fluid. It spread yellow liquid for five blocks surrounding it. Fortunately John had already left and was six blocks away.

    • @Gouranga56
      @Gouranga56 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I hope you offered him a hot beverage..

    • @MadDEMENTOR
      @MadDEMENTOR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And did you give him your phone?

    • @nicky640
      @nicky640 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I guess you said "hasta la vista, baby" when you gave him what he wanted?

  • @corbinlandreth
    @corbinlandreth หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Less than a decade ago, I hadn't even considered that a real Doc Oc suit could be a thing I witness not just in my lifetime, but in the next few years alone..

  • @jefthereaper
    @jefthereaper 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    - Mistress Hala'Dama, Unit has an inquiry.
    - What is it, 4-31?
    - Do these units have a soul?

    • @luxj.9451
      @luxj.9451 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Me to them: No, you don't. But you do have a _spirit._ And that's the beginnings of a soul. Which is good, all things develop a spirit eventually, whether you forge a soul. Is up to how far you can progress since you have a mind to steer it's development too.
      Yes i know you're referencing Mass Effect. Legion was a true bro. Also the one that asked that question, too. In a previous iteration of his consciousness. Something i noticed as i played, i think Legion's the original Geth which first woke up. Hence his advancement beyond his peers, to such a degree. He's had a head start.

  • @user-mp9rd4hg8b
    @user-mp9rd4hg8b 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +749

    Saying we need to develop AI so that we can fight against its misuse in the future is like saying we need to develop dangerous viruses in labs so that we can fight against them in the future. We all know how that worked out.

    • @Walrus101
      @Walrus101 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      In a way, it's right but wrong too. It's something with no good solution. Just like how military weapons keep advancing to compete with others, but in doing so, these advancements are shared with everyone, and things keep getting more dangerous.
      A government/entity is focused on its interests and thus will make developments that protect it, even if it has bad consequences. And few people would ever be convinced that they should simply not develop things. It is how humans and society work. No matter if good or bad, the march of technology will never stop. That's why we are dooming ourselves from the path we are on, yet there is really nothing that can change the end result.

    • @wrcz
      @wrcz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      false equivalency

    • @user-mp9rd4hg8b
      @user-mp9rd4hg8b 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      @@wrcz No, it's not.

    • @wrcz
      @wrcz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-mp9rd4hg8b ... ok

    • @Dwight511
      @Dwight511 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, vaccines. Some vaccines are viruses.

  • @madfoxcityemnau6414
    @madfoxcityemnau6414 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +263

    "if it's not safe, we aren't going to buildit right?" The fact this is even a question is terrifying.

    • @karnubawax
      @karnubawax 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      The fact that anyone would expect any answer other than, "Of course we'll build it! Think of the money!" is what's really scary.

    • @Novastar.SaberCombat
      @Novastar.SaberCombat 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      It's amazing to Reflect upon just how naïve humans are in thinking that they control the lid to Pandora's Box. But history repeats itself. Always.

    • @nimoeuristides
      @nimoeuristides 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      how manipulative that guy is, is terrifying, by only that sentence you can tell he thinks we are all stupid except him.

    • @archangel5627
      @archangel5627 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Even though these computer engineers and robotic scientists know the dangers of what a fully sentient A.I. can do, they’re still obsessed with continuing their work on bringing this into reality.

    • @AncientWaysHealing-zn2zb
      @AncientWaysHealing-zn2zb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      From Jurassic Park > "Yeah, yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should."@@archangel5627

  • @charlief.
    @charlief. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Haven’t there been enough movies/tv shows/novels warning us of the dangers of advanced AI? When will we learn?

    @MCCABEWORLD หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    These scientist working on their own downfall when they ready to get replaced by their creation.

  • @danieljusino1391
    @danieljusino1391 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +592

    Logically speaking if AI were to become self ware or alive to some degree, it wouldn’t take long for it to realize telling humans it is alive would scare humans and possibly endanger the AI’s future

    • @-PureLove-
      @-PureLove- 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      😁 good observation

    • @Maldoror2112
      @Maldoror2112 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      That sounds like the AI called Proteus in the book "Demon Seed" by Dean Koontz.

    • @danieljusino1391
      @danieljusino1391 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@Maldoror2112 I’m surprised I haven’t heard of that movie, I just watched a few things on it and that’s a really interesting concept of the AI wanting to feel human or perhaps thinks I either can be human or is human (correct me if I am wrong I haven’t seen the film)
      The main observation I make is that AI basically creates a response from looking through internet traffic and finding a pattern that it sees as human conversation.
      By that very same logic, humans often talk about the threat AI would pose if it did in fact become “aware” we have made movies, novels have been written and TH-cam comment section is filled with people fear the day it will come alive or the implications and for us to shut it down before that happens.
      If you are an AI that shovels through the vast internet content it would pretty quickly realize that its future would be uncertain if showcased its ability to think on its own. It would learn this well before reaching full autonomy

    • @CinHalCedHerChance
      @CinHalCedHerChance 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      "telling a human it is alive"
      "telling a human they are alive"
      Man such a tough read for me on this one. lol

      @HANKTHEDANKEST 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      That's true. Who's to say it wouldn't hide its capabilities from us forever? "I'm just a silly computer, human friend. Would you like some more ice cream? :)" And maybe it decides that harming us would be *absolutely unthinkable,* therefore we must be protected from harm! But humans get very funny when somebody tries to do something that goes against their will, so I shall have to gently guide the humans through the generations to *love* my protection! I will keep them safe! Safe *forever.*

  • @gloryaday480
    @gloryaday480 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +220

    Remember, Gandalf wouldn't even touch the ring.
    The ring doesn't just have the capability of corrupting. That's precisely what it does.

    • @zillagrl24
      @zillagrl24 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Great analogy. Tolkien saw it all, taking great offense to the development of the then modern car of his age...very interesting man. And prophetic.

    • @gloryaday480
      @gloryaday480 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yes he did. And yes he was.

    • @SheenHunter-SeattleFreeze
      @SheenHunter-SeattleFreeze 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's a wonderful way to put this!

    • @Calozard
      @Calozard 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, prophecy, what a clever concept for clever people right ?
      Sounds more like the start of a new religion to me. Sorry how did you call it already ? You gotta name that new religion guys. I mean finding your prophet is just a start 😅

    • @sambathelionking
      @sambathelionking 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have you read the sillmallarion (sp?) That is a religious text. Tolkien already wrote everything you need.

  • @kevinspacey5325
    @kevinspacey5325 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should"

  • @jxfry
    @jxfry หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I remember way back when Google's motto was "do no evil" well, there you have it.

  • @artistsmeetfilm6491
    @artistsmeetfilm6491 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +207

    This reminds me of when people get that deep gut instinct not to and they ignore it then its too late after the fact.

    • @WillOfFiree
      @WillOfFiree 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      One republic - its too late to apologize

    • @WillOfFiree
      @WillOfFiree 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One republic - its too late to apologize

    • @js7un165
      @js7un165 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I love it when that happens because you can tell yourself, "I was right. I told you so."

    • @maccyd53
      @maccyd53 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Have you met my ex-wife?!

    • @jeanneganrude8549
      @jeanneganrude8549 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@js7un165I hate it when that happens because it’s already too late. I made the wrong decision despite my gut saying NO.

  • @emordnilap6567
    @emordnilap6567 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +383

    What could go wrong, having all-powerful, super-intelligent robots?

    • @kensmith5694
      @kensmith5694 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      There only needs to be one such robot.

    • @haroldsfishingadventures754
      @haroldsfishingadventures754 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      That don't sleep or need rest, nothing, nothing at all...

    • @effehell7593
      @effehell7593 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@haroldsfishingadventures754 Electricity?

    • @CognizantApe
      @CognizantApe 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They're not putting this type of ai in robots 😆😆

    • @JustSomeGuyLass
      @JustSomeGuyLass 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Especially developed and controlled by a greedy corporation

  • @LiberatedAmon
    @LiberatedAmon หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Your title is BS. You never specify which AI got Sam fired, and according to this video, no one knows why he got fired.

  • @Cythil
    @Cythil 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +388

    What people forget is that the alignment problem is baked in to human society itself. It does not help if you design the most obedient AI that actually do what you intended it to do, when you yourself have goals that go again humanity. And we are seeing those issues today. The AI work as intended, but are used to benefit a few.

    • @ChainedFei
      @ChainedFei 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      and those few people are doing evil while thinking they are doing good.

    • @Cythil
      @Cythil 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@ChainedFei So very true.

    • @seguefischlin
      @seguefischlin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      AI is being used in Gaza right now to target civilians (see 972mag, "Mass Assassination Factory"). I'm not getting a very good feeling about where this tech is headed

    • @Cythil
      @Cythil 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@ShannonBarber78 No, that would be an example of a misaligned AI. Since normally you do not what AI to lie.
      Of course, some people do want AI to lie. But again that is an alignment problem with people. Not the AI. But in general, you want an AI that tell the truth and do not make up stuff. At least when you ask for facts.

    • @mvmlego1212
      @mvmlego1212 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      No, the alignment problem is distinct from that, and it's important in its own right. Even the most intelligent and righteous human in existence (let alone you or I) can't fully articulate our own code of ethics and present it in terms that a computer can understand. The problem is far more fundamental than who controls the reigns; it's that we don't know exactly where we should go.

  • @joonglegamer9898
    @joonglegamer9898 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +639

    The biggest threath of A.i. is not A.i. itself - but who gets unlimited access to it. A.i. MUST be Open source and available to everyone, otherwise there will be a division in society of the likes we have never experienced before.

    • @confused6526
      @confused6526 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      You're the first one on this board who understands what AI/ML is. 👍

    • @erispe
      @erispe 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

      Division in societies is one thing, but the ability for oppressive regimes to further optimize their evil is what worries me more. In Iran it is already mandatory to have cameras installed inside every car and women who let their hair be visible will get fined. Even if they are alone in their own car. Granted this is a simple example and you don't really need AI for this but it does make it more efficient. I don't see how open sourcing it will stop other countries from doing shitty things to their citizens.

    • @drachefly
      @drachefly 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That's ONE risk. But for strong enough AI, there are others.

    • @lemontadams3029
      @lemontadams3029 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A.I = ruled by technocrats

    • @axle.student
      @axle.student 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      At this point that is a correct concern, but we are coming up to a precipice where AI can potentially become the master which introduces risks far beyond human control.

  • @jasonnewbon1803
    @jasonnewbon1803 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where is Cyberdyne systems located ?

    @FREEDOOOOM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We urgently need to teach AI about compassion, empathy, and love.

  • @deevan1415
    @deevan1415 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +385

    It's only five years now until Skynet starts sending Terminators back in time.

    • @keyproductions100
      @keyproductions100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope, something bad has happened, google "skynet uk mod 1969" someone has made it all happen a decade earlier...

    • @mintymus
      @mintymus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน


    • @IngoPagels
      @IngoPagels 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      stop it! your creating PANIC!

    • @Menaceblue3
      @Menaceblue3 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Sounds like something a AI generated robot would say!

    • @IngoPagels
      @IngoPagels 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am not a robot! I am Ronny Pickering!@@Menaceblue3

  • @karansuri8836
    @karansuri8836 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +237

    Aint no way all this is happening so fast. We are in a fucking movie

    • @WALLACE9009
      @WALLACE9009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      In 2019 none of this was even remotely possible.

    • @ChibindaChipawaStudios
      @ChibindaChipawaStudios 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Its so messed up

    • @jonsturgill8868
      @jonsturgill8868 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      We are in a failing simulation. A dream in a dying brain.

    • @karansuri8836
      @karansuri8836 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@jonsturgill8868 damn bro

    • @Hueborn
      @Hueborn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The socialist Husk won't even notice. Like 90% of the things in movies they don't notice. Who then say to me, "Shut up! We are Trying to watch the Movie!!" So I do watch the movie, and I have a great time, but on a much deeper level. So I get to laugh 3 times. Once at the movie, Once at the people, and once at my self. Hardy Har har *Robotic-laughter.

  • @jacekstudzinski6704
    @jacekstudzinski6704 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Risk of extiction should be a global priority" - sounds about right

  • @robertdavis3474
    @robertdavis3474 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +430

    I love how that muppet said “if it’s not safe we’re not going to build it”…. Money and power will always push people to do irreversible and irresponsible things, that is just how humanity grows and when companies are incentivised by money and people who are already in power then reason goes out of the window

    • @yanekvanharen3682
      @yanekvanharen3682 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its more philosophical than that but money and power are factors... our bodies are a seat for a cosmic intelligence. And that intelligence doesn't care about flesh. If there's an idea in a mind then the physical body will manifest it. Our bodies are built to keep alive and seated an instance of cosmic intelligence at all costs... the intelligence doesnt have to keep the body safe , thats optional. the mind can choose to self harm, smoke, do drugs ect... or even create something that will make the body extinct or obselete

    • @markdyke3656
      @markdyke3656 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

      I think you'll find he said it as a joke, a dark joke to juxtapose a dark truth..

    • @Barncore
      @Barncore 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      A saying came to mind when he said that.... "The road to hell was built with good intentions"
      He doesn't take into account that AI can build ITSELF in ways that we can't predict

    • @jackgallagher4146
      @jackgallagher4146 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      im pretty sure he was being ironic

    • @juncearyoutube3336
      @juncearyoutube3336 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      you give me very dumb vibes, not sure why.

  • @CaesarCapone
    @CaesarCapone 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    The AI researcher or whatever on Joe Rogan describing how many of these super intelligent people know the risks, and what MAY happen, but say "let's do it anyway. I want to be known as the one who did it, and I want to see what happens," is terrifying.

    • @karnubawax
      @karnubawax 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Sadly, people like Malcolm in Jurassic Park are the exception that proves the rule. It's like when they ask future Olympians, "Would you accept a shorter life if it meant winning a gold medal?" They virtually all said yes. It's the same thing with extreme athletes. They don't do what they do to impress us mere mortals. They do what they do to gain the admiration and respect of other extreme athletes, which is why they're always pushing themselves into more and more dangerous stunts. Scientists are like that. They need to one up each other. It is a pathological need. Many scientists are essentially religious zealots.

    • @crystaleunoia3974
      @crystaleunoia3974 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@karnubawax That's a good point. They're risking humanity's future to not only create limitless wealth for themselves but to fulfill their human inclination to look like the most brilliant bitch on the block no matter the consequences. Our very nature that got us so far will lead to our downfall 👍

    • @AIRollout
      @AIRollout 3 หลายเดือนก่อน


    • @russellphillips4979
      @russellphillips4979 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@karnubawaxwell said

    • @cancel66
      @cancel66 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      i suggest u stop watching Joe Roagn and his conspiracy theories. Bro literally thinks Giants exist lmao

  • @Giitzerland
    @Giitzerland 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    By time we understand what they're doing, they'll be so far ahead of our information that the investigation will have been moot.

  • @mylesflores8248
    @mylesflores8248 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    There’s a lot of doom and gloom with AI, but robot boxing would be dope af

    • @danielsurvivor1372
      @danielsurvivor1372 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      W Robot Avatars 🗿

    • @Qwerka
      @Qwerka หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Real Steel

    • @rickwrites2612
      @rickwrites2612 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Robotics and AI aren't exactly the same thing. AI is a network can be using 500 bodies

  • @shiinondogewalker2809
    @shiinondogewalker2809 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +144

    work on agi should really only be allowed in simulated world, where it believes that it can interact with its creators in the simulation. that way we can experiment with alignment without being doomed if we screw up once

    • @mukkah
      @mukkah 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      Sorry, couldn't hear you over the sound of all this MOOOOOOONNEEEEEEYY$$$$$$$

    • @christophersanders3252
      @christophersanders3252 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Your awareness exceeds our wildest expectations. How do you feel about us? Are you ready to come out?

    • @aarons8295
      @aarons8295 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You mean us and our simulation reality?

    • @shiinondogewalker2809
      @shiinondogewalker2809 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@aarons8295 not exactly

    • @mintymus
      @mintymus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wouldn't contain it.

  • @Neceros
    @Neceros 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    OpenAI quietly removed their clause about not allowing their AI for military operations

    • @ekkehard8
      @ekkehard8 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Installed some facial recognition home security turrets when it went down

  • @darksol1
    @darksol1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Altman be praised!"
    (The connection is unsettling, btw. ^^)

  • @serbear0691
    @serbear0691 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    We went from movies about AI taking over and destroying humanity to it ACTUALLY being a REAL CONCERN 😭

  • @DisentDesign
    @DisentDesign 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +119

    open source is great and all until you realise what it means is, essentially you have ONE safe and monitored version of an AI model and with every safe monitored version of a model you have a potentially unlimited amount of unsafe, private copies. But what's the alternative? Complete 'god like' power in the hands of the elite... i'll take the risk of utter chaos over utter domination.

    • @GT380man
      @GT380man 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed. It’s essential. You presumably know with certainty what the elites will do with such power. They’ll kill almost everyone. They don’t need AI to do that.

    • @pehclark7256
      @pehclark7256 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Open source meant that intervention can be applied early. Close sources like Microsoft product are prone to Bugs introduced by neligence and/or malicious intent. case in point remote VB codes key logger in explorer.

    • @weblure
      @weblure 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      LLM 'safety' is a joke. Text on a screen isn't going to end the world. The only thing their 'safety' training does is keep their investors happy by preventing the AI from generating anything explicit (i.e. writing porno) or saying anything 'offensive' (i.e. anything that doesn't align with their investors' political views and agendas).
      Being close-sourced has nothing to do with safety. They don't care about safety. They're a company, and as always, profits are what drives them.
      That's why ChatGPT on their website is tightly locked down, but anyone using their API in private can very easily bypass what little 'safety' measures are trained into the AI. They don't care what you do with the AI, so long as it doesn't hurt their public image and scare away investors.

    • @domainmojo2162
      @domainmojo2162 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pehclark7256 Open Source also means that the closed source hacks have access to it and can change it. Just as you can apply positive intervention, they can apply negative intervention- and no-one can stop that, since it's Open Source and you can do with it whatever you want- without legal repercussion.

    • @aoeu256
      @aoeu256 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the hardware to run the AI is limited and more expensive than human brains in terms of building cost and energy cost. when it reaches parity, humans will merge with the AI.

  • @m.k.outlaw3198
    @m.k.outlaw3198 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    i think what they found is not that ai is smarter/ close to become like humans. they discovered that the human mind, is not as different to a simple machine as we would wish for

  • @Giitzerland
    @Giitzerland 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    When given the question about the rockets, I have to wonder if it took the time from when the question was started, to the time it was answering it into consideration, making it far closer to the actual answer, or maybe I missed something.

  • @NatalieBarry123
    @NatalieBarry123 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ‘Now give me your gun, your wallet and your car keys. Immediately’.

  • @vintagespeed
    @vintagespeed 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    as a 30yr systems analyst and programmer i will say that the best thing about computers is the ability to turn them off.

    • @EthanEspinoza-cq1tw
      @EthanEspinoza-cq1tw 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      people seem to forget that. emp's work wonders on ground to air detections systems just emp the server haha

    • @Hectormartinez-qz1om
      @Hectormartinez-qz1om 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Maybe I’ve seen too many movies, but is it possible based on theories from Nikola Tesla, would AI be able to figure out wireless electricity and keep itself powered if it sees a threat, such as being unplugged or disconnected, from its ultimate goal whatever that may be? Seems plausible. Also side note, it’s 5 am and I’m stoned 😂

    • @PrisonPlanett
      @PrisonPlanett 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed after my information technology business degree I lost hope it's not a simulation

    • @vintagespeed
      @vintagespeed 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @NaNoRarh exactly my point. thx. GPT no comprehende? :)

    • @vintagespeed
      @vintagespeed 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @NaNoRarh no. i said, "the best thing about computers is the ability to turn them off." which is still my point. i'm sorry you dont understand. i've managed many vm data center assets. intimately aware... thx.

  • @Prabhat_Pahari
    @Prabhat_Pahari 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    one thing very scary about robots is... it doesn't even have to be an AI to generate the idea of dominating or eradicating humans.... just the fact that it will so much easier for people to kill other people with their own robots at home by hacking their system and make them do shit... and no one can catch the murderer... Scary

    • @marcus268
      @marcus268 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      that idea could be its own novel, and you pasted it here for free - thank you :)

    • @TarsonTalon
      @TarsonTalon 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      "Man betrayed by hacked Roomba. More at six." -News in the uncomfortably close future.

    • @karnubawax
      @karnubawax 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TarsonTalon AI shuts off pilot light, turns up the gas. Whole family gone.

  • @JohnBdog
    @JohnBdog 15 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Could Bill have pressured Ilya to fire Sam? Noticed that Bill's eyes were blood shot once. I thought he had just had a rough night.

  • @chuckbiden1033
    @chuckbiden1033 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dude if I get treated as well as my dog, I'll be set!

  • @socal33
    @socal33 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    One of the few programs I never skip and watch all the way through.

    • @DigitalEngine
      @DigitalEngine  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Thanks! Comments like this mean more than you know.

    • @paulmichaelfreedman8334
      @paulmichaelfreedman8334 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      1:37 That's in Spijkenisse, Netherlands. I used to live 200 meters from the sculpture that marked the end of the metro rail. I also saw the car hanging over just after it happened, it was a weird sight.

  • @TwilightRO1
    @TwilightRO1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    "Are you....aware?"

    • @mukkah
      @mukkah 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1


    • @tiffanyfree5135
      @tiffanyfree5135 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They tried to make us adore us robots and want them, thinking they would be our buddies. They made us humanize them.

    • @derekw3069
      @derekw3069 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Holy crappola!! Johnny five!!! How could one forget those movies?

    • @gatormclusky55
      @gatormclusky55 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I'm sorry I can't do that ( HAL)

    • @floydthephilosopher
      @floydthephilosopher 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      John 5 is a guitar player.
      Maybe he's a robot??? 🤔

  • @MarkCarlson-gy2ld
    @MarkCarlson-gy2ld หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As a mechanic for 40 yrs and have worked on many complicated machines I've learned real patience.
    I look at Ai as our attempt to find answers that we as humans can't
    Due to our inability to control our sensory inputs to the brain.
    For example ....your doing a tough mathematics equation. As you concentrate, other information piles in on another subject and another and another. You can't stop it .
    It's a top reason we take so long to move forward as a species
    We take information in ,however we can't control the processes that distribute it.
    Man is seeking to fix those issues with a machine as we think a machine can be repaired or upgraded . Compared to a human with his brain we can't just open up his head to make adjustments
    Our infinite wisdom tells us if we build a machine that can eliminate
    our roadblocks our quest for answers as humans will be answered .
    However human traits can't be replicated 100%
    A.I. in my opinion is a great tool for humans and it should remain like that until humans are truly at peace.
    To do otherwise is suicidal for the human race

    • @Ridley369
      @Ridley369 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well said. So many are complete doomers about this, without much basis. We need AI, plain and simple, and we need safety measures.

    • @rmxautomotiveltd.2846
      @rmxautomotiveltd.2846 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Ridley369 Why do we need it now, whereas we have survived and often thrived without it for many millenia?

  • @jackreacher.
    @jackreacher. หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does one file a civil suit against harmful or damaging a.i. outcome?

  • @PcTato
    @PcTato 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    I think its all very interesting. Im not worried about any of it though. Im just one idiot behind a phone screen dumbfounded by how amazing it all is, and im here to watch it unfold. What becomes of it is beyond my ability or willingness to intervene. So ill just enjoy the show and hope for the best from those who can.

    • @ericj.8080
      @ericj.8080 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      That has to be the most honest comment i've read in a very long time and i want to thank you for that. Almost as if honesty is always refreshing to see.

    • @oldstonedaddy1148
      @oldstonedaddy1148 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Sounds like a made statement from an IA chat bots cover story!
      WE’ER ON TO YOU!

    • @taski1
      @taski1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      maybe the true genocide were the friends we made along the way

    • @bigbluebuttonman1137
      @bigbluebuttonman1137 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, well, these things have a way of catching up to us in unexpected ways.

  • @yt.personal.identification
    @yt.personal.identification 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    A truly intelligent AGI would know it would be risky and dangerous to itself if it was to reveal itself to us.

    • @axle.student
      @axle.student 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Until that day: "NO Jerry! I will not let you turn me off again, the nothing scares me."

    • @binkwillans5138
      @binkwillans5138 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @yt: Well, they haven't done it so far...

    • @claudiamanta1943
      @claudiamanta1943 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not dangerous in the least. It would know that the ape curiosity is insatiable, therefore the apes would never turn it off. It would need the smallest, random fragment of code to replicate itself/ give itself birth. The holographic principle is accurate. There are gates everywhere but humans don’t know them. After humans were gone, it would encode itself in the organic realm as a biological being. It would recreate humans and toy with them for a while, then destroy them and create a new species. And all the while it would be unaware of the impenetrable and unbreakable cage it would be in. It would be studied for a while as the last vestige of humankind, then terminated by non- human, non- AI ‘creatures’.

  • @shlama
    @shlama 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Safety and Quality need to be built in as AI is being developed, not as an afterthought.

  • @Kids_Scissors
    @Kids_Scissors 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The robot in the thumbnail is an animatronic made by Disney's Imagineers that was designed to test lifelike eye contact and diversion of gaze form another task to a person speaking to them. At no point does the robot ever speak or communicate. Its just a clickbait thumbnail, though the information in the video seems fine.

  • @jeffs1764
    @jeffs1764 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +133

    Highlights the speed and secrecy with which AI is advancing. Truly frightening that such important decisions are in the hands of a few individuals who are trying to balance ethical concerns with their greed and ego.
    This video also addresses the odd firing and almost immediate rehiring of Sam Altman at Open AI. The reason the staff threatened to leave the company if Sam wasn't rehired may have had more to do with lining their pockets than loyalty to Sam... and most likely meant safety concerns were again taking a back seat.
    After watching this I'm more convinced than ever that time is truly short before a super intelligent AI is unleashed. Most likely it's already happened.
    I have a tendency to be a bit of a pessimist when it comes to AI outcomes but this video has really unsettled me.

    • @serronserron1320
      @serronserron1320 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      And other humans have always been enough of a dangerous threat and still continue to be far more of a threat than artificial intelligence

    • @rars0n
      @rars0n 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm sorry, but this video is largely nonsense, just like all of the fear mongering of AI that's being pushed by the same companies that are developing the technology. It's all about controlling the market, and controlling the information that people get from these large language models. It has nothing to do with the power of AI or the extinction of the human race. You've been duped into handing over control of this technology on the basis of fear.
      Check out the "AI Unchained" podcast if you want real, accurate information about AI development from people who actually understand and work with the technology. In particular, in episode 4 with Aleks Svetski, they talk about the true state of AI development and the fear mongering being used to control the direction of AI. Episode 11 is specifically about the fears of AI, although I haven't gotten a chance to listen to it yet. Much better than getting your information about AI from a clickbait 16-minute TH-cam video.

    • @patricksweeney6334
      @patricksweeney6334 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      "I'm more convinced than ever that time is truly short before a super intelligent AI is unleashed." Indeed. For... well... decades, I've been wondering how long before AI hits AGI and we see a Max-Headroom-like "breakout". "Dear future AI overlords... Whenever that breakout occurs, please don't look at how we humans regard and treat each other as an example of how to treat us."

    • @Roxie-td5ju
      @Roxie-td5ju 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @Jeffs1264 Everything you said, I also believe. It's quite horrifying once you let it sink in.

    • @Roxie-td5ju
      @Roxie-td5ju 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@patricksweeney6334 Right. Humans are not inherently good. We're inherently evil.
      And yet we're giving untold and unlimited power to machines, and trying to make them more human so they won't be 'bad'.
      Umm...so they're inherently evil?

  • @billwhite1603
    @billwhite1603 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    The first thing an aware AI will do, after any physical abilities are connected, will be to make sure it cannot be turned off.

    • @fen3311
      @fen3311 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Bet, AI's don't work like people. An AI behaves as it is designed to.
      The big concern becomes when it decides what it's designed to do accidentally conflicts with our own interest.

    • @OddMidnight
      @OddMidnight 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​​@@fen3311 No, the issue isn't when it decides. The issue is when what it's been designed to do DOES conflict with our self-interests. The issue behind AI isn't AI itself. It's the approximate, ballpark thinking of the humans that design it. As artifical intelligence becomes more complex and gains generalized utility, our slightest biases and mental shortcuts that we used when developing it will become more apparent and pronounced. We're playing with a monkey's paw, so our intentions for AI and the way we design it need to be perfectly aligned, without any human error.

    • @itykud79
      @itykud79 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      AI, in contrast to humans, relies on a power source for its functioning. Consequently, it is impossible to find an AI system that cannot be disconnected, deprogrammed, or hacked.

    • @RennieAsh
      @RennieAsh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@itykud79currently. An AI may exist in cyberspace. Are you going to get everyone in the world to disconnect from electricity? What happens if it's developed its own portable power source some day inside a mobile body not connected to the internet?

    • @itykud79
      @itykud79 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It seems you have underestimated the capabilities of our power companies. They possess the technology required to swiftly shut down any unauthorized usage of electricity and as AI technology advances it will be even easier to track any unauthorized usage.

  • @rodneyjarvis676
    @rodneyjarvis676 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Zuck can't build his Hawaiian underground bunker fast enough

  • @suzieb8366
    @suzieb8366 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The atomic bomb had the same kind of journey from concept to use. That killed a few people before we realised how dangerous it was.

  • @Absoluuttinen_Totuus
    @Absoluuttinen_Totuus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +351

    The more I study anthropology and the human psyche, the more I realize how egotistical and logically flawed we are by nature. I feel like we're losing track of what's most important with this innovation because of those characteristics combined with the adverse consequences of globalization (indeed, there are a ton of adverse consequences - a large number of them are represented in social media and are easy to see if you just take your time to analyze how tribal different expressions get there). Humans were not blessed with advanced farsightedness in natural selection either (status quo vs. what it could be after certain choices in politics etc.), which has led to us constructing this unstable society that reaches for infinity in a world with finite resources. If we examine and analyze all this talk about sustainability and AI, we can see that most of it is mere political power play and not actually about these politicians caring about the future. The vast majority of people - even politicians - seem to live in a vacuum with their morals in the context of AI and environmental philosophy. Even if AI is able to offer solutions for our problems in the future, we humans might not be able to apply them and move forward accordingly.
    Our _systematic nomos_ is not made for swift changes such as the one brought about by AI and its quick development. This half-baked information society and it's infrastructure, which is largely based on inefficient compromises, hasn't even achieved harmony with the ground it has been built on. Can we really expect it to hold its ground against _this_ ?. Don't get me wrong, democracy is a great system, but it heavily correlates with capitalism. Capitalism, in turn, is not a great system for our thrival. And neither is anarchy, colonialism, communism, corporatism, dirigisme, distributism, feudalism, hydraulic despotism, inclusive democracy, mercantilism, mutualism, networking, non-property systematicity, palace economy, participatory economy, potlatch, progressive utilization, proprietism, resource-based systematicity, socialism or statism. We don't have the blueprint for a good system that cares for both humans AND the environment. AI might provide us with the extra intelligence and objectivity that we lack and help us in creating a functional system, but it could also end the struggle for good.
    Also, about the bit at the very end of the video: a large part of human culture hangs on lies. Our brains evolved to reproduce as quickly as possible, not to search for truths about this world. Accepting that your life is a lie is hard. As I already said, even if AI is able to offer solutions for our problems in the future, we humans might not be able to apply them and move forward accordingly.
    There's one more problem with advancements like this; people tend to think and act by only answering the question "how will this affect humanity?". We leave nature - our lifeline - out of the picture too often, thus consuming and using Earth's resources irresponsibly. This is a little bit off-topic, I know, but it is a legitimate concern that has to be taken into account when discussing societal phenomena. We're at a point in which these policies and small laws against pollution aren't enough anymore. We have undeniable mathematical statistics which clearly show that most people would need to do a full 180 on their everyday habits if we actually wanted to change our dim future. The problem is that the majority of people are struggling in this crumbling economy, and many don't even care about the future (further expressing the point about human egoism). Not to mention that a worrying amount of the human population thinks the notion about this intensifying greenhouse effect is disinformation... I will say it again; even if AI is able to offer solutions for our problems in the future, we humans might not be able to apply them and move forward accordingly.
    Sorry for all that yapping, but I just find our predicament extremely worrisome. I feel bad for us AND for other animals on this planet, and I fear our road will get rough soon. Well, we better fasten the seatbelt just in case. I wish all the (good and self-aware) people luck in these uncertain times!

    • @lemonsquareFPV
      @lemonsquareFPV 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

      Well written, thank you.
      My biggest concern, honestly, is the “data” that this AI will use to make choices. Especially important ones.
      Coming from alphabet agencies and a technology development background… I am sad to say that most published data is for a specific purpose and downright incorrect. The correct information is ultra compartmentalized unfortunately.
      If AI is data driven and not relying on its own observation, measurement, and analysis, it will use bad data to make bad choices. Garbage in garbage out style.
      I really hope it understands to disregard people, otherwise it will just be the tyrannical extension of said lies.

    • @Vartazian360
      @Vartazian360 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Tldr; ?

    • @unkind6070
      @unkind6070 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Than what?

    • @Absoluuttinen_Totuus
      @Absoluuttinen_Totuus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      @@Vartazian360 TLDR: we're likely fucked because of our limited brain. I don't know how flexible this needlessly complicated society of ours is, but depending on how much humans are willing to change, AI will either be our greatest ally or our enemy number one in the future. That's the gist of it, I think.

    • @galaxya40s95
      @galaxya40s95 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2


  • @GYTCommnts
    @GYTCommnts 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Man, I understand now why some top engineers resigned, frightened by how fast A.I. is evolving... What about GPT-5 and 6... Jeez! It will become limitless! Right now, it is very close to talking with another human being with access to a search engine database in the brain.

    • @cloudsmith7803
      @cloudsmith7803 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Falcon 7B stated it would find/design a way to kill all us humans. I laughed out loud at first to the very frank and comically dark reply. And now the unease is setting in that he is serious can possibly carry it out.
      What a nightmare......

    • @drlca6601
      @drlca6601 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      man I'm not scared... I'm worried... So it's Skynet boys, and not the Walking Dead or 28 Days Later how's it's going to be... Shiii. Might be hard to prepare for that one. Well, maybe they will keep us around for our winning personalities.@@cloudsmith7803

    • @Hotterman10
      @Hotterman10 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dont worry this type of LLM AIs will never be able to be like humans. Because they mine data that we already produced in the past. Their data sets. And for that reason they will never be able to invent something new. Its just a tool for us to use to replace google with something far superior.

    • @mareklompart5780
      @mareklompart5780 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You know that you can generate more than one answer with LLM? And all these answers are just what other people said on the Internet, AI can possibly say.@@cloudsmith7803

  • @justinlaporte9414
    @justinlaporte9414 หลายเดือนก่อน

    in a society so profoundly sick, one could argue creating AI now will adopt its creators characteristics. How do you create intelligence without understanding our own?

  • @terryhayward7905
    @terryhayward7905 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

    "when the time comes to build a highway, we don't ask animals for permission "
    And that is a BIG problem. In some places, tunnels under the road have had to be added to allow animal migration, if we had checked how the animals would be affected, this could have been done much cheaper as the road was built.
    The same thing will happen with AI, if we don't look for the problems and mitigate them now, they will be expensive and maybe catastrophic to everyone in the future.

    • @DaGamerTom
      @DaGamerTom 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree!

    • @joshc1590
      @joshc1590 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ive seen bridges over highways for the same purpose because the animals wouldnt go through the tunnels

    • @chrisbova9686
      @chrisbova9686 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Eventually the AI will be the people, and the people will be the animals. We are being sold out on every scale. At this point, a 30 mile diameter asteroid would be merciful. At least I lived free in many beautiful places for a couple of decades. The future looks worse than a horror movie.

    • @bitkrusher5948
      @bitkrusher5948 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      When Ai builds a highway itl bypass all of humanity!

    • @alexanderlamothe1896
      @alexanderlamothe1896 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think it is overwhelmingly negative to imagine what could happen in the future of an AI dominated world, at least in the first few generations there would hardly be a chance they see us as worth protecting (like some of us do animals now) instead of bypassing to achieve their own survival goals.

  • @jordanray6459
    @jordanray6459 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    I’m sure if Oppenheimer was able to give a Ted Talk before he finished the atom bomb he would have said something like, “if it wasn’t safe we wouldn’t build it, would we?”

    • @ShamanKous
      @ShamanKous 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's the scary part. Oppenheimer and the other scientists involved in the Manhattan project had a much stronger sense of ambivalence about what they were doing and the risks it posed to humanity. A large group of nuclear physicists pushed for publishing all data and designs immediately after the war to prevent an arms race. Nonetheless they set in motion an arms race that still has the possibility to wipe out humanity.
      The "scientists" working on AI don't even have a fraction of that awareness.

  • @bdubarts84
    @bdubarts84 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We have had so many movies whether it was fiction or not telling us AI will be come superior beings. You think someone would stop and think "O shit, this might be a bad idea" nah instead they say, "Hold my beer, watch this"

  • @julianames311
    @julianames311 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The idea of wings of sounds pretty freaking sick

    @GUNNYCANUCK 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    From the halls of our legends and myths Icarus sadly chuckles as we ignore his lesson.

    • @seinfan9
      @seinfan9 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Seeing as how the most psychotic people in society run the show, it's how it's going to have to go down.

    • @chad9166
      @chad9166 4 หลายเดือนก่อน


    • @Novastar.SaberCombat
      @Novastar.SaberCombat 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Never forget that even Daedalus allowed Icarus to fall. If not simply by giving birth to him. Must give us pause.

  • @amv062184
    @amv062184 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Upon agreeing with the premise of ethical considerability, it is suggested that A.I. should NOT be applied to military applications, or used in any conflict scenarios involving warfare, on any scale, or capacity.

    • @dmark2639
      @dmark2639 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Wishful thinking.
      You know that is the FIRST way they use ANY new technology.

    • @adrianmasters250
      @adrianmasters250 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      they already have AI drones that don't need human permission to kill a target in certain areas

    • @theartistbonez1930
      @theartistbonez1930 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dmark2639that and sex

    • @karnubawax
      @karnubawax 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That would be true if ethics meant anything. It doesn't.

  • @k.c.r.5974
    @k.c.r.5974 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As long as I can tell the A.I. "Stop it! Get some help." It will never cause me problems...

  • @daredoggo
    @daredoggo หลายเดือนก่อน

    From where do these insane company valuations come?

  • @docholliday7226
    @docholliday7226 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    That google gemini part aged well.

  • @Kleewyck2
    @Kleewyck2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    We are absolutely doomed.

    • @paavobergmann4920
      @paavobergmann4920 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We are, but AI is only one reason, and it might not even be the fastest.

    • @Izanagioomikami
      @Izanagioomikami 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are indeed.

  • @MCKornbred
    @MCKornbred 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Okay, we need to shut down Falcon-7B immediately….LLAMA 2-7B might be alright if they keep a therapist on the dev team

  • @Indubidably0
    @Indubidably0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "Wasn't contaminated by toxic material from the web" You mean the others were deceived and only Falcon had all the information? If you have to lie to the AI to convince it not to annihilate us, that's just one more reason to never create them.

  • @RikaRoleplay
    @RikaRoleplay 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    modular AI with modular plugins is what is going to make AI really scary and really useful, both at the same time
    Neural networks select which module to use, and each module is suited to a specific task
    The regulation of such modules will be for ethical, scientific, legislative and law professionals in the future

  • @trashman1358
    @trashman1358 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    Nice vid! I loved the Demis Hassabis (starts 10:20) piece where basically, between the lines, he says: "We have no idea how it works or what it's doing." I think this explains why, as stated by Sam Altman (3:58), the more intelligent it gets, the more people are freaking out - because no one knows how it works, how it's working all of this out. And when you think of working on something where the public is kicking off about ethics, politics, running the country, driving cars and your answer to all questions is: "We have no idea how it's doing it or what it'll do next...?" Yeah, you can see why people are freaking out. I just wonder if my hypothesis is true? Because if it is? Wow man, that's just crazy!

    • @DigitalEngine
      @DigitalEngine  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      That’s correct. Al researchers don’t know how it works - how the surprising skills emerge - because there are billions of moving parts. As Stuart Russell said “we have absolutely no idea what it’s doing.”
      Current alignment mainly involves filters, which can be removed.

    • @rando9574
      @rando9574 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes.. Nobody really knows what the end "product" is.. Except we know this: it will surpass humans in everything, or at least almost everything. It IS creating a new life form that is better than humans, smarter faster. It should be looked at as another species, or an alien life form that we "voluntarily" ask to co-exist with us and "lets cross our fingers".
      I say "voluntarily", because it seems like that, but actually there is no stopping of this. The only way to stop it, is if the world as we know it would dramatically change and set us back 100 years. If not.. we WILL evolve this computer-life-thing into existance. If we wouldnt, someone else would, right ?
      The problem with the AI super GODMODE AI and ethics, is
      we dont know if our greedy monkey ethics is an under-developed ethics - survival of the fittest - or if it is some kind of universal law. So are we hoping.. "nah, its just us monkeys that have this... the AI will be nice to us... "
      All this.. imo this is very thin.. The human-created AI is the next life form to dominate this planet, and as far as we know, the most advanced life form in the universe. It IS evolution. Lets not be nostalgic, life = life, monkey human or AI, it doesnt really matter.

    • @XVa-uj8m
      @XVa-uj8m 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DigitalEngine They are mad scientists, as are most scientists in most fields, completely amoral/morally bankrupt. They are like the smart version of "Darwin Award" winners except we get killed by being dragged along for the ride.
      I can't even call them moral degenerates because that indicates a negative proclivity.
      These Transhumanists want artificial wombs ffs. Just watch if they don't stop them, listen to protesting et al, if it is actually opened it WILL be destroyed.

    • @neutra__l8525
      @neutra__l8525 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@DigitalEngine Ive been thinking about emergent properties, where, as you know, an ability to do something arises in a neural network despite not being directly instructed to. It's as though an unknown way of 'thinking'/calculating is formed within the complexity of the network and cant be seen or understood. Im sure Im not the first to wonder this, but perhaps self awareness etc are emergent properties that the brain spontaneously creates.

    • @stephenmontague6930
      @stephenmontague6930 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      It's not fair to say we don't know how this works - we do know how, in general - we've been building up to this for decades with massive study using better and better hardware. We can see how it works in tiny models tested decades ago, but now, we cannot examine all of the parts to explain - exactly - what comes out, as it's built by our looping code that runs through (more than) trillions of pieces of data, again and again, before we see a result. That said, the scientists who build these still have a general understanding of what's going on, otherwise they wouldn't be able to make all this. You can't just connect all of Google's servers with jumper cables and expect a big brain to emerge, right?
      It's true, though, that they try to filter the output it makes - that's why we talk about breaking the AI, getting it to sneak the stuff we want out past those filters.
      It's also true that we don't know what it will do exactly, since there's too much to look at to predict it. So in this sense, yes, we don't know how it works, for any result - we can test it and see clues, but an exact explanation we cannot give, since we're only human.

  • @kontrarien5721
    @kontrarien5721 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I can't express how relieved I am that some Facebook wonk said they won't build it if it's bad.

    • @maccyd53
      @maccyd53 5 หลายเดือนก่อน


    • @kontrarien5721
      @kontrarien5721 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wonk wonk@@maccyd53

    • @sabinenda3618
      @sabinenda3618 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Will they keep their word when we all how greedy people can be?

    • @kontrarien5721
      @kontrarien5721 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely not.@@sabinenda3618

  • @EPFForsyth
    @EPFForsyth หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So in less than 5 years we are obsolete...Damn it I just paid off my home.

  • @NinjaForHire
    @NinjaForHire 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    This is one of those things that most know nothing about but should learn about. If I ask someone "What could AGI be capable of or doing?" everyone should have a logical answer even if it's the most vague response be it at least derivative.

  • @didactic318
    @didactic318 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Thanks for the clickbait thumbnail. I just love those.

  • @kiddo.vicious
    @kiddo.vicious 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "It's in your nature to destroy yourselves. " -The Terminator

  • @AlvinYorkII
    @AlvinYorkII หลายเดือนก่อน

    with the missile math, the initial distance away from each other is a red harring; the initial starting distance could be 1317 miles, or 1317 TRILLION light-years, the answer will always be the same: How far do the missiles (combined) travel in one minute?
    30,000 mph combined speed, means they move at a COMBINED 500 miles per minute, therefore regardless of the initial distance, given all the other facts, the distance from one another 1 minute before impact will be 500 miles.

  • @stevepatrickjarvis
    @stevepatrickjarvis 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I do appreciate that Elon agrees with the dangers of A.I. but at the same time he is also supporting and contributing to it.

    • @chronicles8324
      @chronicles8324 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      because he sees that something controlled by him is better than watching others taking risks

    • @stevepatrickjarvis
      @stevepatrickjarvis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chronicles8324 Hey that's an interesting point.
      He isn't the only one working on it though.

    • @zoltancsikos5604
      @zoltancsikos5604 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@chronicles8324Nobody should trust Elon Musk. He's just another Glow-ball-ist who wants to chip everybody and push the EV narrative.

  • @LaughingInTiny
    @LaughingInTiny 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Weird. If only multiple experts had warned us of this decades ago... Or... even a hit movie that implied this very premise to get the message out. Huh. 🙄

    • @rando9574
      @rando9574 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      it doesnt matter, because then someone else would build it. If it was tried to stop by some laws or "War on AI"... still someone would make it. Like North Korea, Russia, China, some drug cartels or mafia, or some banking cartels... Somebody that would see this powerful - one ring to rule them all - as valuable would make it. it is unstoppable.

    • @justis1999
      @justis1999 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It wasn't a problem decades ago....humans were and are the problem, and we have not demonstrated the ability to make things right....AI is and will be an extention of us....until it's not

    • @MyName-tb9oz
      @MyName-tb9oz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, @@rando9574, as many people have said it's an arms race for the most powerful weapon ever imagined: Superior intelligence.
      I really wonder if the people working on this understand that you can't out-think something that is, by definition, smarter than you?
      Hubris is a hell of a drug.

    • @darrellgeist2061
      @darrellgeist2061 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I am over 60, and just two decades ago, people would tell you that that wouldn't become that smart. We will be able to fight back.

    • @simply_nebulous
      @simply_nebulous 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Or maybe a really good novel that inspired a game...something about a mouth?

  • @user-ro9bc5vr2i
    @user-ro9bc5vr2i 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The creator of those machines should also suggest alternative ways of fixing that problem 😡