Hikaru, at timestamp 20:50 after a7, Ra8, white could go Ra6, preparing Na4 and Nb6. In this scenario pawn on a7 does not hang and black knight on g3 is not in time to get back to defend. Am I missing something?
so bad your channel is so full of ads covering the board or interrupting the contents of the video. i used to like your youtube channel but now it's simply full of garbage and impossible to enjoy.
That game would have taken a lot of energy out of Alpha Zero too, can't imagine playing for so long and defending so well just to end up in an incredibly difficult endgame and losing.
@@TeknoKseno I'm more impressed of Magnus winning that, hearing from almost every source "it's a draw" to win it, well, I guess he had to see a potential in it and pushed it to the limit :D
@@goldenguti that position in the endgame was very solid for Magnus. He would have to do some terrible mistakes for losing it. While Ian had to be very accurate the whole endgame and eventually lost because of some inaccuracies. That is why it was much more harder for Ian. And also Magnus didn't hear any sources saying that it's a draw.
This can hardly be overstated. I'm a complete chess noob, I know nearly nothing about high level chess, but the explanations are JUST simple enough for me to get a grasp, from which I can then look up the terminology and try to understand what is happening. It's slow and explained enough that I can follow, but fast and abstract enough that it doesn't feel boring and overly technical. As much as the whole Match is a masterclass in chess - obviously - Hikarus analysis is also a masterclass in chess commentary - and shows that it can be both entertaining AND technical at the same time.
Hikaru just earned huge respect from me, although I never was a big fan of him, hearing how everyone is saying how obvious and unforgivable is c5 and bashing Nepo, its quite frustrating, Hikaru on the other hand handles it with understanding and explains what Nepo's logic was behind the move
@@rudolftenvoorde7472 for some reason people think he has a big ego, which he doesn't. I ve seen people be happy when he loses a game, saying " that really affected his huge ego" or " that really put him back in his place". hikaru is such a great person and wholesome overall, idk how you can hate on this man. people want perfection from others while they re broken themselves
@@sadeyezgaming4231 for a titled player it should be an absolute no brainer. I make these kinds of mistakes regularly, and I want to bang my head on the table after such moves and I'm 1200. GM's make blundets but rarely this blatant. A GM blunder is like losing some pawn in a position that leads to a losing endgame down the road and then losing the game. Or perhaps even failing to see an absolute brilliant stunning tactical sacrifice from the opponent in the middle game. Not a blunder like this. Just losing a piece with nothing to show for it.
yeah, nobody explained what was Nepo's intention with c5 move on different livestreams, except for Hikaru. Everyone just says ''it's a blunder'' while watching the engine on the side monitor. I saw many livestreams videos where even GMs and no title chess player also considered the c5 as an option, then they realized after someone else noticed the blunder or checked the engine. The point is even some GMs considered c5 at least for a moment in the confort of their desk at home or work. Now imagine Nepo in that chair alone, with the world watching him, and in front of probably the GOAT. So, it's easy to criticize someone like that. That's why I hate live transmissions with engine analyzing the game, even the white/black bar. There is no point, no mystery, in my opinion. Also, it makes everyone looks more ''skilled'' than the actual players.
Yeah. Hearing HN analysis is fast and he is coocky to say what move is best or bad. He doesnt back that word. He just honestly said that. I love the analysis, its just like hearing your friend talk about chess instead of reading a thesis about the commentary of the game.
Much appreciated breakdown from this Hikaru here. This was a clinical interpretation of what other grandmasters and commentators simply dismiss as tilt and move on. Hikaru gives Nepo the respect he deserves and doesn't try to throw cheap jabs while he is down Love from Russia!!❤
Even when Karjakin went on to lead by a point , almost none believed he could hold it ... Magnus is just out of this world. Which game was it when he was in time trouble? Dude just blitzed perfect moves till time control... It's almost safe to say that Magnus will retire as a champion. Insane.
21:12 the b6 square could also be reached from d7 but unfortunately for White, this square is guarded by the bishop and there is no way to kick it from that diagonal. An alternative idea would be to try to protect the pawn with the knight and to go for Rb8 but unfortunately, the knight would have to go to b5 or c6, which are both controlled by the bishop (directly or through the pawn).
Thanks for the explanation. Some of the commentators were so ruthless in bashing Nepo’s blunder as if he’s not under immense pressure playing the most important match of his life. He’s a human like the rest of us that’s prone to error, in the end Carlsen is simply more experienced with the pressure and performed better.
Nepomniachtchi played 12 consecutive engine moves in the opening despite the fact that Magnus was playing sidelines. How do you play like an engine and then drop a bishop?
Opening u can rely on prep memorizing engine lines, mid to end game he had to rely on his own calculations ( which he is obviously great at) but in that situation u could see the mental cracks, he relied on his positional play which he is great at and did not calculate all the variations to play fast and pressure magnus on time but here his position slowly started to get worse and worse
GMHikaru and AkaNemsko vids popped into my feed awhile back and re-ignited an interest in chess for me lost for more than 30 years.....this is the first game analysis I have watched and was following nicely right up until Hikaru said 'by playing the move pawn to c4" after that my brain melted.
Guys, it was all calculated by Magnus. If he'd taken the c4 pawn in the opening, Ian couldn't have pushed it to c5. Next level mindgames. (this is a joke btw)
Game six was won by wearing down Ian by refusing the draw. Ian kept looking up at Magnus when he was thinking his move and seeing that this is a draw would look up at him time and time again. . I watched all 8 hours of it, and wondering why Magus would not go for a draw. It was clear to me about move 60 or so that he meant to wear Ian down. It worked.
@@HiReeZin You are wrong. I was not trying to be precise on the lateness of the move that turned it but neither had any clear win until move 132 when black's queen wades over to the smothering side of the board where all white pieces could come forward closing options little by little for the queen. The real move that made it a clear winning game for Magnus was Blacks Queen moving to h7. The h6 move before it could be the one, but not clear how. The black queen should have stayed out of that smothering side anyway and be where it could have a better chance to find perpetual checks. In in case Magnus wore him down. where Qh7 was a truly blundering move.
@@josephrorie5728 It's still silly to use "refusing the draw". White had a clear objective, it is to promote a pawn. If the process took many moves it's still just another normal endgame win. Folks seem to make something special out of this game (other than it was a good game of chess), but I don't buy into it. There are many opening variations that regularly produce this kind of endgames with greatly unequal material. They are just so risky that they don't appear in WC matches these days. I would understand if it had been some KRN vs. KR, where the stronger side really can shuffle. But also there you just must defend those 50 moves. They kept score. In this 6th game white had a clear plan, managed to execute it and won.
@@HiReeZin There was no way to enforce that plan until the mistake is made. No way Magnus could guarantee that would happen. It was sticking to it to see. That is what I said in the beginning.
Well it isn’t “officially” over. That will be after a couple more games. But it practically ends Ian’s chances. Ian is playing impulsively. That is likely due to anxiety. I appreciated the excellent breakdown Hikaru.
But I think in this case we could have a 2800 Stockfish against Magnus and he should still be able to draw enough games to not lose 3 out of 5 games (what Ian needs to win the series).
@@Reb0rnLP magnus would easily win against a bad stockfish. 2800 elo is less than magnus's elo LOOOOOOOOOL if you mean 3800 elo which is about the rating of stockfish 14 then no, magnus would lose all 5/5 games. Don't care how good you are playing someone 1000 points higher rated than you is not savable. (think a 1400 playing someone who just learned how the pieces move)
@@vulblhotdiessfi We're talking about Classical Chess and official rating. Not chess24 or some other online stuff. Magnus is rated 2856 in standard chess (what this tournament is). Rapid and Blitz ratings are slightly lower and higher respectively. So yes, I am talking about a 2800 Stockfish (or any AI that can play at that level and not too far above or too far below). Obviously it doesn't have to be exactly 2800, but given that Ian is 2782 it should be alright.
@@Reb0rnLP what. of course magnus will win? what was the point of your comment then? every minute 60 seconds passes we already know this LOL. saying magnus MIGHT win against a 2800 stockfish is insulting to him and insulting to our intelligence you think we don't already know that. pointless
I saw many livestreams videos where even GMs and no title chess player also considered the c5 as an option, then they realized after someone else noticed the blunder or checked the engine. The point is even some GMs considered c5 at least for a moment in the confort of their desk at home or work. Now imagine Nepo in that chair alone, with the world watching him, and in front of probably the GOAT. So, it's easy to criticize someone like that. That's why I hate live transmissions with engine analyzing the game, even the white/black bar. There is no point, no mystery, in my opinion. Also, it makes everyone looks more ''skilled'' than the actual players. Because everyone knows the correct answer and stop thinking along with the players. It's just not the same....
Come on, Magnus saw it in a second as he said in the press conference. For example Giri said he saw it too within a second .. and he couldn’t believe what nepo just did. Ok sure some are just commentators who need an engine but men, giri Magnus nepo are the bests of the bests and that is just the truth. You have expectations from such players to not play the best moves every time, but a least not blunder a move other players with the same rating spots in 2 seconds ..
Nakamurah’s commentary sounds like a Sixth Grader giving a presentation on the solar system. “And this is the fourth planet: Mars. And so in addition to Mars there’s the sixth planet Saturn. Saturn has rings. I like planets and have been to one before.”
I find it somewhat amusing that Hikaru explains the mistake kindly but the headline reads "COLLAPSE!". It's a fairly bad mistake at their level (Anish's "Jan has lost his danger sense" feels very appropriate). But even I saw the move in Yan's last loss so this one feels less jarring even though it's a full bishop. Also, Magnus doesn't get to complain about it, he lost a full bishop himself once (though he did win the game!).
That's not a solution to the problem of getting the knight to a square where it supports the promoting pawn without getting exchanged by the bishop. When bishop and knight is out you have two rooks watching the pawn and black's other knight have good time to come over and help out. It travels twice as fast as a king and can allow itself to take on h4 before a7. Then you get a pawn end game with two pawns more - an easy win.
No he cannot, because consider this line Ra5 Ne2+ Kf2 Nd4 Na6 Nb5 And then you loose that a pawn. 👍👍 And after Ne2+ kf2, u can even go to Nc3 to not even allow Na6. The rook cant attack blck knight anyway as white would loose that a pawn or the whole idea flops. And after Nc3 it can go back to Nb5 to help defend. 👍👍
20:54 can someone explain to me why prior to rerouting the knight as Hikaru says, Ian doesn't play rook a5, so when he moves his knight, it doesn't block the rock defending the pawn, I guess magnus has his knight to jump around with or something?
Awesome Analysis @GMHikaru... After Bxb7, Ra4 and c6 have trapped the bishop anyway with or without the c5 move. Ian should have retreated the bishop to a safer square after the rook Ra4 move. He was too focused on saving the c pawn (should have given back the c pawn for the b pawn and focused on the game instead). He had like 54 minutes to play out all the lines mentally... Unfortunately, he rushed and made quick moves... I feel sad for Ian but I guess his own undoing. He should take a leaf out of Magnus's book... In every game Magnus had just 10 to 15 minutes only left but, he thought through all lines and subsequently made faster moves to reach 40 moves... Ian on the other hand made super quick moves (usually good for late middle game/end games) in the early stages of the game where many pieces means many many different lines are possible and needs to be thought through...
Does anyone else notice that Hikaru's audio level sounds a bit low and lacking in low frequencies on the TH-cam videos at times? If not, it may be my own issue; but at first, I wondered whether he was drifting too far from his microphone. I've noticed this on a few of his other videos as well. Or maybe he is using too much signal processing in order to block the music on the stream (Twitch) audio. The background music (if you can even call it that) just sounds muddled and annoying here. Maybe he should use a headset mic, or not apply so much processing of the audio, since it's really distorting the frequency response, and turning whatever the background music is into noise. It's great coverage of the game, however! - j q t -
I think all the collabs with Bok and with Shankland - Hikaru's accidentally j'adoubed ;) his mic too low. We're gonna try to have him raise it tomorrow. Thanks for letting us know. -- Team Hikaru
Big player also make blunders in big games, very rare in that kind but they both are working hard. I am still a noob but I try to get better. Chessbrah, levy, magnus and ur channel is a big help. Thx 4 that.. Hope for Ian that he recovers psychological to show in the coming games that he is capable to make it more difficult like the epic game no 6. Good job Hikaru. Hope I can see u playing against Magnus on the world championship. He prefer 2 play against u he said a while ago. Greetings out of Frankfurt.
Fun part is when I was watching this game 9 live...at that time when Nepo played c5... I instantly spotted c6 & that bishop is trapped... At that time I really wished that his challenger should have been DING, FABI, ALIREZA OR SERGEY...
I dont know your rating. Im 1900 and did not convert the trapped bishop on 4 tries against Stockfish yesterday. I don't buy all those people saying the spotted the trapped bishop instantly, most just tell themselves they would see it, when the fact is its not at all that clear, and not at all so easy to convert it either.
@@aocdk840 To see the bishop is trapped is easier than converting the win definitely. Stockfish just creates chances out of nowere lol (passed >a pawn+ g5-h5 to create a passed h pawn is definitely tricky
@@Life-Sky yes, but honestly youre not seeing a trapped bishop if you are unable to calculate why, this is the mistake so many people make. They think that because the engine shows its trapped, they could also easily make this calculation. Show a simular position to any 1800 - 2000ish player and ask them to evaluate, it will take them many hours, and they most likely will get it wrong.
First we had Gotham chess doing recaps, now we have the super GM Hikaru him self doing recaps, what else could we ask for, this is great. I mean what's next? Magnus doing recaps of stockfish vs LC0 games?
It was mentioned in the video about h4, but I think the critical error in this game was Nepo's focus, while he still had a solid position he made several moves in about one minute without any deep calculation. To me it seemed like he had already given up to play in this manner. Also for the past few games Nepo engaged in post-game talk about the position which I think is a tell that he has lost the mental battle. I think if you are fighting for the win in a long series you don't compare notes with the opponent at any point.
what if Nepo played night b7 , on 22:39 ? Threat is for Nepo's night to go d6 -> c4 -> b6, so Magnus would have to play night f5, Nepo would still put night on d6 and exchange night, he would end up with pawn on d6, and white king is faster to get there then black king. And Nepo has chances or am i missing something?
When Nepo won the Candidates I was hopeful he was, given the then winning record he had against Magnus, going to put at least some if not more pressure on Carlsen than Caruana had a couple of years ago. I think the first 5 games demonstrated he can apply such pressure although wasn't able to convert the small windows of opportunities Magnus allowed him. But after the heartbreaking loss on the marathonic game 6, I feel he got impatient and he's just trying to finish Carlsen off as soon as possible. On one hand I undestand the longer the game goes, the better for Magnus, but on the other side, you just can't self-inmolate kamikaze style hoping to sink your opponent AND survive at the same time. R.I.P. Nepo. Hopefully you will get another chance.
They were children during 3 of those games, and both players have changed in skill level since then, which is why Ian's past wins are not so relevant to the games of the present.
Why was Nepo talking about bad luck in the press conference? Was it because there was no counter play or ideas to equalize, or bad luck that he blundered in the first place?
It's crazy how many people say they spotted the trap, I call BS. The conversion is not at all easy, and it's by no means an instant blunder where the piece is collected risk free in 2 or 3 moves time. Even Giri who said he saw it in 2 seconds can not have calculated all the way to the Rook / Knight endgame, which wins by collecting 2 weak pawns, giving back the piece. It's the big problem of engine evaluations, people see the result, but don't understand the calculations involved, hich mistakingly makes them believe they are simple.
I didn't realise how much play white actually had .. holy shit there was so much to consider and fight with. At that level, I'm sorry but Nepo has gotta be seeing at least some of these opportunities
Hikaru, i really like this kind of commentary so much more. Keep this up please!!! I hate when you keep interrupting your self constantly with the thanking and the extra noises. I feel you don't need to do that anymore as that appeal has either faded or the original audience for that has now grown into more serious chess fans that can appreciate your pure analysis.
For everyone looking for the whole live commentary, we gotchu! Going up in 6 mins from this comment: th-cam.com/video/TuzSDAFAAc4/w-d-xo.html
thanks!
Hikaru, at timestamp 20:50 after a7, Ra8, white could go Ra6, preparing Na4 and Nb6. In this scenario pawn on a7 does not hang and black knight on g3 is not in time to get back to defend. Am I missing something?
so bad your channel is so full of ads covering the board or interrupting the contents of the video. i used to like your youtube channel but now it's simply full of garbage and impossible to enjoy.
@@Дмитро-х2г after ra6, black has ne2+, king wherever, and then Nd4 followed by Nb6 to win the pawn on A7. White loses by one tempo.
How similar was this game's error to Fischer trapping his bishop in the first game of the 1972 match?
Game 6 took a lot of energy, both physically and psychologically outta Nepo.
That game would have taken a lot of energy out of Alpha Zero too, can't imagine playing for so long and defending so well just to end up in an incredibly difficult endgame and losing.
Yeah and then game 8 probably didn't help with self belief
@@TeknoKseno I'm more impressed of Magnus winning that, hearing from almost every source "it's a draw" to win it, well, I guess he had to see a potential in it and pushed it to the limit :D
@@goldenguti that position in the endgame was very solid for Magnus. He would have to do some terrible mistakes for losing it. While Ian had to be very accurate the whole endgame and eventually lost because of some inaccuracies. That is why it was much more harder for Ian. And also Magnus didn't hear any sources saying that it's a draw.
Did he tell you this or
Hikaru’s explanations are so high level, but so clear and accessible. Much appreciated!
This can hardly be overstated.
I'm a complete chess noob, I know nearly nothing about high level chess, but the explanations are JUST simple enough for me to get a grasp, from which I can then look up the terminology and try to understand what is happening.
It's slow and explained enough that I can follow, but fast and abstract enough that it doesn't feel boring and overly technical.
As much as the whole Match is a masterclass in chess - obviously - Hikarus analysis is also a masterclass in chess commentary - and shows that it can be both entertaining AND technical at the same time.
Imagine being the c7 pawn of this match and you didnt expected to become the killer 😎
Now Imagine you are the c4 pawn who threw up by moving to c5 🤪
And you don't have to move a single square to do that😁.
Hikaru just earned huge respect from me, although I never was a big fan of him, hearing how everyone is saying how obvious and unforgivable is c5 and bashing Nepo, its quite frustrating, Hikaru on the other hand handles it with understanding and explains what Nepo's logic was behind the move
Why are you not a big fan of him?
@@rudolftenvoorde7472 for some reason people think he has a big ego, which he doesn't. I ve seen people be happy when he loses a game, saying " that really affected his huge ego" or " that really put him back in his place". hikaru is such a great person and wholesome overall, idk how you can hate on this man. people want perfection from others while they re broken themselves
also liked that, was it that clear? or is it easy to say just because they have tools that calculate for them i real time ?
@@sadeyezgaming4231 for a titled player it should be an absolute no brainer. I make these kinds of mistakes regularly, and I want to bang my head on the table after such moves and I'm 1200.
GM's make blundets but rarely this blatant. A GM blunder is like losing some pawn in a position that leads to a losing endgame down the road and then losing the game. Or perhaps even failing to see an absolute brilliant stunning tactical sacrifice from the opponent in the middle game. Not a blunder like this. Just losing a piece with nothing to show for it.
yeah, nobody explained what was Nepo's intention with c5 move on different livestreams, except for Hikaru. Everyone just says ''it's a blunder'' while watching the engine on the side monitor.
I saw many livestreams videos where even GMs and no title chess player also considered the c5 as an option, then they realized after someone else noticed the blunder or checked the engine. The point is even some GMs considered c5 at least for a moment in the confort of their desk at home or work. Now imagine Nepo in that chair alone, with the world watching him, and in front of probably the GOAT. So, it's easy to criticize someone like that.
That's why I hate live transmissions with engine analyzing the game, even the white/black bar. There is no point, no mystery, in my opinion. Also, it makes everyone looks more ''skilled'' than the actual players.
Watching HN analysis only enhances the genius of MC.
ICAUATT, GFYS
@@maxivy IAWMI. IRDETGOMC
Dude, LA!!! IALH.N.ISC!!!!!
Yeah. Hearing HN analysis is fast and he is coocky to say what move is best or bad. He doesnt back that word. He just honestly said that. I love the analysis, its just like hearing your friend talk about chess instead of reading a thesis about the commentary of the game.
ITAWWYS BAOY
Much appreciated breakdown from this Hikaru here. This was a clinical interpretation of what other grandmasters and commentators simply dismiss as tilt and move on.
Hikaru gives Nepo the respect he deserves and doesn't try to throw cheap jabs while he is down
Love from Russia!!❤
He deserves criticism after his performance the past 4 games. It’d be disrespectful not to criticize him, we all expect more from him.
this is incredible that we get to hear the thoughts of a super gm on detailing the games like this. What a time we live in. Thanks Hikaru!
Exactly... It is like having Morphy explaining openings. Thix is pure Gold!
that bishop was like: help stepmaster i am stuck
gold 😂😂😂😂
lmao
Thanks Hikaru for once again providing us with an excellent expert analysis of the world championship game.
Magnus has the deepest bag out of any chess player ever and he's mastered every master-able aspect of the game 🐐🐐
Except for the botez gambit and the bongcloud, it takes a lifetime to master those
@@timmortier5318 he did Master the bongcloud no ? He played it against nakamura
@@TheMFLORD He's severely lacking in botez gambit though
@@timmortier5318 He still needs to master the legendary wooden shield in order to be called the goat.
wild how a lil pawn push can be catastrophic
Even when Karjakin went on to lead by a point , almost none believed he could hold it ...
Magnus is just out of this world.
Which game was it when he was in time trouble? Dude just blitzed perfect moves till time control...
It's almost safe to say that Magnus will retire as a champion.
Insane.
Ironic that the c-pawn he tried to create imbalance with, ended up being his downfall.
It went imbalance, Ian didn't have the light bishop
21:12 the b6 square could also be reached from d7 but unfortunately for White, this square is guarded by the bishop and there is no way to kick it from that diagonal. An alternative idea would be to try to protect the pawn with the knight and to go for Rb8 but unfortunately, the knight would have to go to b5 or c6, which are both controlled by the bishop (directly or through the pawn).
Thanks for the explanation. Some of the commentators were so ruthless in bashing Nepo’s blunder as if he’s not under immense pressure playing the most important match of his life. He’s a human like the rest of us that’s prone to error, in the end Carlsen is simply more experienced with the pressure and performed better.
Nepo sucks
Nepomniachtchi played 12 consecutive engine moves in the opening despite the fact that Magnus was playing sidelines. How do you play like an engine and then drop a bishop?
Yes, that would be the question.
lack of concentration maybe ....
Human things
Opening u can rely on prep memorizing engine lines, mid to end game he had to rely on his own calculations ( which he is obviously great at) but in that situation u could see the mental cracks, he relied on his positional play which he is great at and did not calculate all the variations to play fast and pressure magnus on time but here his position slowly started to get worse and worse
@@TheMarc477 I doubt Ian was in prep for most of the opening. I'm guessing he wasn't ready for Bc5, but he played quickly anyways.
Insane that after the game Ian said that he was between slightly and much better the whole game. Wildly overestimating his position again
Did he really say that? What a joke
he started losing his mind, lol. these painful losses triggered some defense mechanisms
I'm rooting for Magnus, but damn is it hard not to feel bad for Nepo
Yeah, he looks like a very good guy.
GMHikaru and AkaNemsko vids popped into my feed awhile back and re-ignited an interest in chess for me lost for more than 30 years.....this is the first game analysis I have watched and was following nicely right up until Hikaru said 'by playing the move pawn to c4" after that my brain melted.
Guys, it was all calculated by Magnus. If he'd taken the c4 pawn in the opening, Ian couldn't have pushed it to c5. Next level mindgames. (this is a joke btw)
He just can see the future. Hikaru said it.
At least Nepo got a nice haircut and $800k out of the deal.
In the other side, there's one particular journalist in press conference who think Nepo haircut is not "nice".
"Magnus is mm...magnus is mm... He.. He can see the future" 😂😂😂⚡⚡
Hikaru has such great and lucid analyses
Game six was won by wearing down Ian by refusing the draw. Ian kept looking up at Magnus when he was thinking his move and seeing that this is a draw would look up at him time and time again. . I watched all 8 hours of it, and wondering why Magus would not go for a draw. It was clear to me about move 60 or so that he meant to wear Ian down. It worked.
Well. He lost it coz he was careless. Carlsen had no reason to accept a draw after 53..Qe4?
@@HiReeZin You are wrong. I was not trying to be precise on the lateness of the move that turned it but neither had any clear win until move 132 when black's queen wades over to the smothering side of the board where all white pieces could come forward closing options little by little for the queen. The real move that made it a clear winning game for Magnus was Blacks Queen moving to h7. The h6 move before it could be the one, but not clear how. The black queen should have stayed out of that smothering side anyway and be where it could have a better chance to find perpetual checks. In in case Magnus wore him down. where Qh7 was a truly blundering move.
@@josephrorie5728 It's still silly to use "refusing the draw". White had a clear objective, it is to promote a pawn. If the process took many moves it's still just another normal endgame win. Folks seem to make something special out of this game (other than it was a good game of chess), but I don't buy into it. There are many opening variations that regularly produce this kind of endgames with greatly unequal material. They are just so risky that they don't appear in WC matches these days.
I would understand if it had been some KRN vs. KR, where the stronger side really can shuffle. But also there you just must defend those 50 moves. They kept score. In this 6th game white had a clear plan, managed to execute it and won.
@@HiReeZin totally agree
@@HiReeZin There was no way to enforce that plan until the mistake is made. No way Magnus could guarantee that would happen. It was sticking to it to see. That is what I said in the beginning.
8:40 Mr Nepo, why didn't you play b4 ??
It's the most powerful move in chess.
Before the game, Fabiano endorsed the evan’s gambit hoping Nepo would play it today. We must make agadmator aware of this.
And so, the Juicer becomes the Blocker! And thus the Kingdom was Lost.
This is like watching an agadmator video but faster and with more arrows
Fresh fade nepo, threw game nepo
I like the old nepo, the always bold nepo, the going for candidates gold nepo
This blunder is borderline incomprehensible, it's a one move piece blunder in the WCC.
wait, editor, why is the audio soooo low??
That marathon game drained nepo out...I think he wants to go home...doesn't look like his mind is in it anymore.
Well it isn’t “officially” over. That will be after a couple more games. But it practically ends Ian’s chances. Ian is playing impulsively. That is likely due to anxiety. I appreciated the excellent breakdown Hikaru.
But I think in this case we could have a 2800 Stockfish against Magnus and he should still be able to draw enough games to not lose 3 out of 5 games (what Ian needs to win the series).
@@Reb0rnLP magnus would easily win against a bad stockfish. 2800 elo is less than magnus's elo LOOOOOOOOOL
if you mean 3800 elo which is about the rating of stockfish 14 then no, magnus would lose all 5/5 games. Don't care how good you are playing someone 1000 points higher rated than you is not savable. (think a 1400 playing someone who just learned how the pieces move)
@@vulblhotdiessfi We're talking about Classical Chess and official rating. Not chess24 or some other online stuff. Magnus is rated 2856 in standard chess (what this tournament is). Rapid and Blitz ratings are slightly lower and higher respectively. So yes, I am talking about a 2800 Stockfish (or any AI that can play at that level and not too far above or too far below). Obviously it doesn't have to be exactly 2800, but given that Ian is 2782 it should be alright.
@@Reb0rnLP what. of course magnus will win? what was the point of your comment then? every minute 60 seconds passes we already know this LOL. saying magnus MIGHT win against a 2800 stockfish is insulting to him and insulting to our intelligence you think we don't already know that.
pointless
@@Reb0rnLP also the fact you said classical and official rating like that isn't common knowledge. LMFAO
Andrea Botez should've asked Nepo in the interview afterwards "How does the bishop move?"
This is like a bullet style tilt but in a world championship in real time.
Hikaru is the best.
Man its so rough for Ian. I feel like there's no way he loses g8 or 9 if he g6 wasn't such a damn masterpiece.
Idk about it being masterpiece. Nepo missed bxb4 twice that game which was a simple pawn take after which black has a free shot on the position
@@dieterschneegans1850 not necessarily magnus' masterpiece, just a masterpiece from a spectating standpoint. Maybe not the right word
@@achi-lles6903 at the end magnus played masterfully no doubt. I just thought the middle was a bit weird. In particular bxb4 not being played twice
Magnus: You can pray to the chess God if you'd like - but spoiler alert - I won't listen.
Savage. Lol
1. c4
...
37. c5?
I saw many livestreams videos where even GMs and no title chess player also considered the c5 as an option, then they realized after someone else noticed the blunder or checked the engine. The point is even some GMs considered c5 at least for a moment in the confort of their desk at home or work. Now imagine Nepo in that chair alone, with the world watching him, and in front of probably the GOAT. So, it's easy to criticize someone like that.
That's why I hate live transmissions with engine analyzing the game, even the white/black bar. There is no point, no mystery, in my opinion. Also, it makes everyone looks more ''skilled'' than the actual players. Because everyone knows the correct answer and stop thinking along with the players. It's just not the same....
Come on, Magnus saw it in a second as he said in the press conference. For example Giri said he saw it too within a second .. and he couldn’t believe what nepo just did.
Ok sure some are just commentators who need an engine but men, giri Magnus nepo are the bests of the bests and that is just the truth. You have expectations from such players to not play the best moves every time, but a least not blunder a move other players with the same rating spots in 2 seconds ..
Once again I am here for the brilliant insight AND the high-altitude eyebrows.
Damn, wanted a replay of the live reaction. A shame with vods on twitch being sub only.
He posts the full videos on his second channel MoreGMHikaru. Todays game is not up yet, but should be soon.
Going up in a few minutes: th-cam.com/video/TuzSDAFAAc4/w-d-xo.html
@@GMHikaru Oh great! Thanks 😀
so is magnus now tied for most wins ... so if he wins in 2 yrs he will be the uber master?
eh, it's another statistic. He's already maybe-uber-master. It will depend on his quality, and his opponents' quality.
What is uber-master ?
@@giovani7262 7 wins
Great analysis, captivating as always; thank you Hikaru!
And congratulations to Magnus for another great achievement!
Cant wait for the full unedited reupload
Thanks. Missed it. Will try to see what happens in Game 10. Keeping it objective is really good!
The topknot was his strength. Samson allowed himself to be Delilah'd.
He got a fresh trim tho
Nakamurah’s commentary sounds like a Sixth Grader giving a presentation on the solar system.
“And this is the fourth planet: Mars. And so in addition to Mars there’s the sixth planet Saturn. Saturn has rings. I like planets and have been to one before.”
Excellent analysis!
thanks man, tons of great info in a short amount of time. That's the way!
Great breakdown Hikaru. I really enjoyed it. Thank you. :)
I find it somewhat amusing that Hikaru explains the mistake kindly but the headline reads "COLLAPSE!". It's a fairly bad mistake at their level (Anish's "Jan has lost his danger sense" feels very appropriate). But even I saw the move in Yan's last loss so this one feels less jarring even though it's a full bishop.
Also, Magnus doesn't get to complain about it, he lost a full bishop himself once (though he did win the game!).
Jan plays like an engne when you set it to 2000 Elo. It plays the best moves and sprinkles a blunder in each game.
The reason Magnus moved the rook to a4 is because he can see the future! 😀
Feel bad for Nepo, that devasting loss after the 8 hour game was the breaking point.
Before the blunder nepo was already slowly slipping and the queen trade benefit magnus’ ease of play
Couldn't Nepo have moved rook to a5 or a6 at the end, then move his knight?
That's not a solution to the problem of getting the knight to a square where it supports the promoting pawn without getting exchanged by the bishop. When bishop and knight is out you have two rooks watching the pawn and black's other knight have good time to come over and help out. It travels twice as fast as a king and can allow itself to take on h4 before a7. Then you get a pawn end game with two pawns more - an easy win.
@@TH-cam_Stole_My_Handle_Too he is talking about the position before the c6 pawn was pushed to c5. So there is no bishop knight exchange. At 21:15
@@Exiitar Then 22:07
No he cannot, because consider this line
Ra5 Ne2+
Kf2 Nd4
Na6 Nb5
And then you loose that a pawn. 👍👍
And after Ne2+ kf2, u can even go to Nc3 to not even allow Na6. The rook cant attack blck knight anyway as white would loose that a pawn or the whole idea flops. And after Nc3 it can go back to Nb5 to help defend. 👍👍
I honestly am so impressed with both of them. I think they should both be super proud of that match
How has Ian impressed you? Losing 3 out of the last 4 games and two of them by simple blunders. I feel like he robber us of an exciting match.
20:54 can someone explain to me why prior to rerouting the knight as Hikaru says, Ian doesn't play rook a5, so when he moves his knight, it doesn't block the rock defending the pawn, I guess magnus has his knight to jump around with or something?
20:53 There is a chance to get the queen if Nepo played rook to a6 before moving the knight on a4 ? @GMHIKARU
Awesome Analysis @GMHikaru... After Bxb7, Ra4 and c6 have trapped the bishop anyway with or without the c5 move. Ian should have retreated the bishop to a safer square after the rook Ra4 move. He was too focused on saving the c pawn (should have given back the c pawn for the b pawn and focused on the game instead). He had like 54 minutes to play out all the lines mentally... Unfortunately, he rushed and made quick moves... I feel sad for Ian but I guess his own undoing. He should take a leaf out of Magnus's book... In every game Magnus had just 10 to 15 minutes only left but, he thought through all lines and subsequently made faster moves to reach 40 moves... Ian on the other hand made super quick moves (usually good for late middle game/end games) in the early stages of the game where many pieces means many many different lines are possible and needs to be thought through...
Your mic has been very quiet lately. Just so you know.
Does anyone else notice that Hikaru's audio level sounds a bit low and lacking in low frequencies on the TH-cam videos at times? If not, it may be my own issue; but at first, I wondered whether he was drifting too far from his microphone. I've noticed this on a few of his other videos as well. Or maybe he is using too much signal processing in order to block the music on the stream (Twitch) audio. The background music (if you can even call it that) just sounds muddled and annoying here. Maybe he should use a headset mic, or not apply so much processing of the audio, since it's really distorting the frequency response, and turning whatever the background music is into noise. It's great coverage of the game, however! - j q t -
I think all the collabs with Bok and with Shankland - Hikaru's accidentally j'adoubed ;) his mic too low. We're gonna try to have him raise it tomorrow. Thanks for letting us know. -- Team Hikaru
Big player also make blunders in big games, very rare in that kind but they both are working hard. I am still a noob but I try to get better. Chessbrah, levy, magnus and ur channel is a big help. Thx 4 that.. Hope for Ian that he recovers psychological to show in the coming games that he is capable to make it more difficult like the epic game no 6. Good job Hikaru. Hope I can see u playing against Magnus on the world championship. He prefer 2 play against u he said a while ago. Greetings out of Frankfurt.
Fun part is when I was watching this game 9 live...at that time when Nepo played c5... I instantly spotted c6 & that bishop is trapped...
At that time I really wished that his challenger should have been DING, FABI, ALIREZA OR SERGEY...
Alireza? Shut up
@@abhlyy1738 why not...the way he is playing now is just amazing... crossing 2800 within such a short time...
I dont know your rating. Im 1900 and did not convert the trapped bishop on 4 tries against Stockfish yesterday. I don't buy all those people saying the spotted the trapped bishop instantly, most just tell themselves they would see it, when the fact is its not at all that clear, and not at all so easy to convert it either.
@@aocdk840 To see the bishop is trapped is easier than converting the win definitely. Stockfish just creates chances out of nowere lol (passed >a pawn+ g5-h5 to create a passed h pawn is definitely tricky
@@Life-Sky yes, but honestly youre not seeing a trapped bishop if you are unable to calculate why, this is the mistake so many people make.
They think that because the engine shows its trapped, they could also easily make this calculation.
Show a simular position to any 1800 - 2000ish player and ask them to evaluate, it will take them many hours, and they most likely will get it wrong.
Thanks for make the game understandable for us... humans. Cheers!
21:37 - Ra5 for white (intending Na4 next) ? Does that fall to ... Rb1+ etc or does the Bishop still get to c6 regardless ?
Hikaru never ages haha
The audio is too low! Check your sound level before starting.
The world: omg Magnus touched a piece!
Magnus : can Nepo redo that last move? Please.
First we had Gotham chess doing recaps, now we have the super GM Hikaru him self doing recaps, what else could we ask for, this is great. I mean what's next? Magnus doing recaps of stockfish vs LC0 games?
Yeah let’s just sit back & act like we would do any better 😂
ian pulled a bobby fischer 😭
More like a Spassky
Whats the song at 11:00? Id love to listen to it while i practice
really unfortunate Nepo makes the classic bathroom blunder. Happens when you drink too much red bull
It was mentioned in the video about h4, but I think the critical error in this game was Nepo's focus, while he still had a solid position he made several moves in about one minute without any deep calculation. To me it seemed like he had already given up to play in this manner.
Also for the past few games Nepo engaged in post-game talk about the position which I think is a tell that he has lost the mental battle. I think if you are fighting for the win in a long series you don't compare notes with the opponent at any point.
what if Nepo played night b7 , on 22:39 ? Threat is for Nepo's night to go d6 -> c4 -> b6, so Magnus would have to play night f5, Nepo would still put night on d6 and exchange night, he would end up with pawn on d6, and white king is faster to get there then black king. And Nepo has chances or am i missing something?
Bishop c6 and you kill all ideas of promoting
@@AlfreMKwhite Rook A6 kicks bishop away
Hikaru, please do more of these!
Very clear analysis explaining essential ideas
Even I saw C5 was losing....albeit after it was explained to me.
Same here. don't know the clock , but the knight had to be pushed by the pawn.
😜
When Nepo won the Candidates I was hopeful he was, given the then winning record he had against Magnus, going to put at least some if not more pressure on Carlsen than Caruana had a couple of years ago. I think the first 5 games demonstrated he can apply such pressure although wasn't able to convert the small windows of opportunities Magnus allowed him. But after the heartbreaking loss on the marathonic game 6, I feel he got impatient and he's just trying to finish Carlsen off as soon as possible. On one hand I undestand the longer the game goes, the better for Magnus, but on the other side, you just can't self-inmolate kamikaze style hoping to sink your opponent AND survive at the same time.
R.I.P. Nepo. Hopefully you will get another chance.
He gets to play at the candidates so if he is really the best player behind Magnus, he'll get another chance to prove it
They were children during 3 of those games, and both players have changed in skill level since then, which is why Ian's past wins are not so relevant to the games of the present.
20:49 Why not Ra6 and then Na4 ?
Why was Nepo talking about bad luck in the press conference? Was it because there was no counter play or ideas to equalize, or bad luck that he blundered in the first place?
Tilt is real
It's crazy how many people say they spotted the trap, I call BS. The conversion is not at all easy, and it's by no means an instant blunder where the piece is collected risk free in 2 or 3 moves time.
Even Giri who said he saw it in 2 seconds can not have calculated all the way to the Rook / Knight endgame, which wins by collecting 2 weak pawns, giving back the piece.
It's the big problem of engine evaluations, people see the result, but don't understand the calculations involved, hich mistakingly makes them believe they are simple.
yeah even hikaru had trouble converting that saying it was very easy at first and then saying I am so bad 😂😂😂
Hello darkness my old friend...
Did Hikaru review game 6? I was really interested in that one since it's so subtle but couldn't find Hikaru's review for it.
i like the way you explain Sir..much succes for you
Your volume is quite low.
Nepo didn't eat his Wheaties this morning
It’s the battle of the amazing hairlines.
This is why Magnus is the GOAT.
I dream of a Carlsen Nakamura match. Please!!!
Keep dreaming..all due respect to hikaru he's not In the same ballpark when it comes to classical. He's not even good enough to qualify
it would have been possible when he was at his peak at classical and world #2, not now.
I didn't realise how much play white actually had .. holy shit there was so much to consider and fight with. At that level, I'm sorry but Nepo has gotta be seeing at least some of these opportunities
damn good analysis
So Nepo needs to do is win 4 straight and he'll win, not over.
Hikaru, i really like this kind of commentary so much more. Keep this up please!!! I hate when you keep interrupting your self constantly with the thanking and the extra noises. I feel you don't need to do that anymore as that appeal has either faded or the original audience for that has now grown into more serious chess fans that can appreciate your pure analysis.
It's a club level mistake and most 1300 rated players would spot c6 trapping the Bishop. Has to be the biggest blunder in world championship history.
Why are you not competing Hikaru