We as a nation are responsible for not teaching our children about horrific conditions under British colonialism. Every western nation has a robust history curriculum, where they don't just teach facts and dates, but push the new generations to critique the mistakes of the past. How is it possible that our great grandparents suffered under such brutal, inhumane colonial powers, so many gave their lives in the process for liberation, and the moment we got freedom, there was literally ZERO effort to develop and teach a history curriculum to show everything in detail and the kind of history curriculum that would give our children confidence as Muslims, as well as hope for developing a bright future. Everyone just sits around and waits for a savior. Everyone dreams of escaping to Europe or USA because the systems there allow for financial flourishing. No one realizes that it's not the place that allows you to thrive, but the collective will and hard work of people that develop proper systems for economic prosperity. We need to start forming coalitions and create our own institutions that if managed properly, will naturally and quickly replace the old broken systems that keep people in poverty. Stop languishing in self pity. Get up, form teams based on skills and objectives, and get to work!
Three things that need to happen are 1. Secular democratic governance in real earnest 2. Take over-religiosity away from education and teach youth to ask questions; STEM subjects are crucial. 3. Empowe women; with untapped potential of half of Muslims, progress is not possible Ask your grandparents and they will tell you that there was better Law & Order and Justice during British time
Millions of people died of famine in Bengal under the British. Under the British, means of wealth were stripped from colonial territories. It was not better under the British and Euros are in no position to lecture.
@@Farrukhsiyar159 Are you suggesting famines (failure of rains for one .more years) happened only under British. The Deccan famine of 1630-1632 was a famine (back-to-back crop failure) during the reign of Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan leading to intense hunger, disease, and displacement in the region. About three million people died in Gujarat in the ten months ending in October 1631 while another million died around Ahmednagar.
Western schools are educating your children. No "muslim country" exists that runs on Shariah, barring Afghanistan's recent entrance to the scene... all the current "muslim countries " are nation-states that run on secular laws. They are products of the very colonialism you speak of... and you think those on the thrones aren't benefiting from it? Ofc those cowards are.
Thanks for having him over. A polite suggestion would be that before pushing up assumptions and making him defend his position. Or asking very narrow specific long questions. It would have been more helpful to first give the professor time to present his basic idea and put it in context for you, especially for the first time/ start of the conversation. And then ask questions in response to that. Either ways it’s exciting to see these bridges develop! More power to you!
Ibn al-Jawzī said: "If you find a darkness in your heart after you have sinned, then know that in your heart there is light, because of that light you felt darkness." ● [روضة المحبين حجم ٢، صحفة ١١٢]
This question itself is so wrong.. that khilafah is possible or not.? Offcourse khilafah is possible most important , without khilafah muslims are Orphan. For khilafah to be establish again...first Arabs need to unite as one body,one Arabia region. For that these Arabs dictators must need to go.
You rightly say that question is wrong but then give wrong reasons for that. We already have too much of religiosity in all walks of life and this has only led to Muslims living in Dark ages over last hundreds of years. The only developed Muslim nation has been Turkey and its progress started with abrogation of Caliphate! There are many religions in world but do you see any developed state that draws its model from religious ideology?
You’re totally right; we shouldn’t have a defeatist attitude about this. Instead of focusing on whether we can have a Khalifah, we should be asking when, where, and how we can start building the foundations and institutions to make it happen. It’s time to move past these outdated, useless and ineffective ideologies like Liberalism and Democracy (which are even older than Christianity, if not Judaism), as well as secularism and other "isms." These ideas aren’t practical, fair, or just, and they don’t provide a solid foundation for societies to thrive. Instead, they often end up benefiting a select few while allowing others to be mistreated. Is time to make the Muslim ummah lay its foundation and bring back the justice system of Allah SWT (i.e. Shariah).
The whole idea of universal Caliphate is nothing but a bullshit . Today every nation has its boundaries . Caliphate is nothing but a supremacy of Quraysh ( as clearly mentioned in hadiths ) and why would any nation want to surrender itself . Then according to you whatever is happening in Palestine and Kashmir and to other muslims is absolutely fine ( we should not seek freedom , just make a compromise that ok we both are gonna use each others resources , I mean this is what your Caliphate teaches . But , no country would like to get merged with another country . And we have a union system or a confederation wherein the countries are united but have their own individual identity but we lack it in Caliphate .
@@captainpotato3769 What else was it ? A foreigner comes in your land, buys a house, uses your resources ( I know it's happening vice versa ) and rules upon u ( Arab or Quraysh ) destroys your culture. What worst can we have then . Kashmiris were fighting against India on these same issues. I mean no offense but Islamic political system is a threat to culture and also to your independent existence.
Are they like rivals? I have although once seen Daniel criticizing omar suleymani but we must never forget that though correction is necessary but we should always support people upholding islam
Muslim countries are diverse in culture lunaguges colour different tribes and castes and hate among the different castes within sunnis there are multiple divisions and each division doesnt consider other division followers as muslims.
The problem today is that Muslims don’t want to accept that the caliphate can only be with a man from Quraysh (Sahih Muslim 4477). Stop arguing with your leaders like Bani Israel argued with Allah appointing Talut as their king. Even Bani Israel accepted that only the children of Dawud would be their kings. You will not have a Chinese, European, or Turkic caliph. You will either accept Allahs decree or suffer perpetual humiliation. Allah has given the authority to the descendants of Ibrahim until the end of time. If you don’t like it then debate with Allah and see where that brings you..
@@trollfacemafiagaming6036 feasible? The first caliphate wasn’t necessarily “feasible”. The reason why the Arabs accepted Quraysh to lead is because they had an honorable lineage from Quraysh and bani Hashim were the custodians of the Ka’ba. The prophet already told us that they have to be from Quraysh. When you say feasible, do you mean an economy and military? Those already exist in every single country. The only thing that Muslims have to do is just submit to someone as a caliphate. That isn’t going to happen because of sectarianism and nationalism right now. All of the tools needed for a caliphate are already here. Muslims themselves are the ones making it not feasible. Maybe if Allah sends a plague or a natural disaster in Muslim countries it’ll be more “feasible”. Maybe Muslims need to be in pain severely to realize how easily it could’ve been accomplished. Maybe Allah has already sent this umma some tests and tribulations so that they can come to their senses, yet they persist on nationalism and sectarianism. Maybe a severe earthquake would be good right about now.
@@trollfacemafiagaming6036 the only reason that it isn’t “feasible” is because Muslims simply don’t want it. If they wanted it, they wouldn’t of brought in fiat currency, corporate monopolies, western attire, western books, and adopted the western form of politics. Muslims don’t want a caliph they want to be a secular democracy. This problem is within Muslims. The feasibility of a caliphate is just as feasible today as it was 1400 years ago. The ground still produces fruit and gold and iron and wood still available on trees. Muslims want to live trike the west and imitate their way of politics and join their global trade networks. The model of a caliphate has always been understood. Nationalism and sectarianism is more important to Muslims in 2024.
I thought it would be an Intellectual discussion but lost the bet, br anjum is trying to mix every thing. He has facts but with out a clear discourse he appreciates the present democratic setup and paints the mixture with an layer called academic intellectual history, in the battle of ideas it is foolishness if u try to mix every thing, he says we have to compare the different methods adopted by different movement , he Fails to appreciate that every new movement has risen to do away with the precieved short commings of the earlier one , it would be a waste of time again of we start to compare the movements that have already failed and have reached to level of compromise with the status quo. He Fails to appreciate the present world order has the basis on it hard millitary power apart from its Ideology. At best he is an academic and will be a waste of time if he wants to make it a movement. He has not answered ur question regarding the spectrum of the failed movement from Algeria to Egypt etc.
Read his article or book lol it's much more clear Aman hindered him here as everyone isn't the type to have a quick witted back and forth some people take time
Looking backwards, while walking forward is a recipe for Great Fall. Doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different result, is Einstein's definition of stupidity. Muslims are prisoners of their own device.
It is ironic that like Anjum Bhai (from Karachi) just as most of other eloquent supporters of Caliphate, actually left their Muslim homelands to emigrate to west and had this revelation about Caliphate and are now professing it from west. His belief @7:26 in Muslims being best Ummah (do we see that?) and therefore need for Caliphate is best described as "Standing in the gutter and looking at the Moon". Pakistan is not suffering from colonialism (BTW world’s biggest and longest colonial project is in fact Ottoman Empire itself) but Military rule and absence of secular democratic institutions. One may now say ISIS is ugly etc. but these groups got their inspiration from same Islamic theology and did attract many educated youngsters. A common hypocrisy of Islamic apologists is to view non-Muslim oppression of Muslims as a much more heinous crime them Muslims oppressing fellow Muslims. Just look around and you will see; in Israel - Judaism vs Islam, in France (& most of Europe)- Christianity vs Islam, in India - Hinduism vs Islam, in Sri Lanka - Buddhism vs Islam, in China - Atheism vs Islam, in Myanmar - Buddhism vs Islam and in Middle East- Islam vs Islam. Islam is at the center of nearly all violent strife in world today WHY? All religions create otherism and Islam does that most severely. The otherism only leads into counter Otherism; and that is a vicious cycle.
"A secular Muslim is someone who believes that the Creator was sufficient enough to set highly calculated mathematical and physical laws that organize planets in orbit but wasn’t sufficient enough to create laws that organize human society." Please.
Your take is centered on the orientalist approach to Islam. As for isis these groups are extremists who misinterpret Islam to fit an agenda much like the KKK and Zionism. Islam is at the center of many conflicts due to the absolute dominance a unified Muslim Bloc has over the rest of the world particularly Europe. The dislike for Islam in the west is rooted in the ideological schools of liberalism branching out of the age of the enlightenment. And this was a result of the hatred of Islam by the Catholic and Protestant churches. These hatred’s from Europe have directly shaped the culture and identity of Europe towards Islam to this day, because they know Islam is much more organized than the church and can not be influenced by politics and other external factors as the church was. The modern nation state of Israel is also a factor in the unrest in the region of the Middle East and Muslim world because when their is peace there is intellectual prosperity and when their is chaos there can be nothing other than the preservation of life and order no growth. This is done to prop up Israel as the regions leader of power and order which is all manufactured. The cia started the Arab spring, the Brit’s funded the insurrection against the Ottomans and France swooped in to north Africa with pure violence killing innocents and forcing the people to speak French so they could establish the intellectual dominance over them. So make no mistake the fight against Islam is perpetrated intentionally
@@onnixchaney8797 Absolutely not true. ISIS, Al Qaeda, Taliban, Al Shabab, Boko Haram, Abu Sayaf, Al Nusra, Jemmah Islamiya, Ansar Al Shariya, Ansar Bayt al Maqdis, Hamas, Hezbollah, Lashkar e Tayyiba, TTP, KGK and many such groups are deriving their inspiration from same Islamic texts (Quran and Hadiths) and popular support from Muslims despite having killed hundreds of thousands of innocent non-combatants over the world. So this passive and ineffective approach of burying the head in sand is very disingenuous. Islam due to its "Otherism" and odious repressive stuff has invited the criticism and fear amongst non believers. Remember that extremism of one kind feeds into extremism of other kind Enlightenment arose among other things out of distancing governance and sciences from (all kinds of religion) by using Brains instead of (divine) Books and Christianity bore the brunt of it. Most ancient religions have undergone re-formation whereby the odious texts have been de-fanged. This special claim of Islam to not to be offended / challenged (for a reformation) is not tenable. Islam is not internally uniform but sectarian (72 firqas) in practice with each sect claiming others being Kafir and professing violence against each other. If liberalism is such a bad stuff why so many Muslims are striving for entry into western liberal societies? Modern state of Israel was created by a (two thirds) UN vote as per international law to which Arabs did not agree and started a unilateral war in 1948 (followed by wars in 1967 and 1973). Kindly recall that a much bigger partition (with much larger blood-shed and displacement / migration of refugees) took place in India around same time; so creation of Israel is not such a unique event after all. Incidentally in second case, all refugees were rehabilitated and are today generally more prosperous than locals. (BTW Funny that leftists (foolishly; in light of past experience) and LGBTQ brigade is joining hands with Islamists without realizing that they do not gel at the basic level)
"Pakistan is not suffering from colonialism" The modern world order is a colonial order in all but occupation and it even has that in parts (American military bases) with it's rules monetary system and international organisations set up by those previous colonisers and is rooted in their philosophy and thought , it is heavily tilted in the favour of the west and even despite that it doesn't allow other states to self govern even in the laws and system it set forth , Particular in MUSLIM countries tho not limited to them and PAKISTAN is a particular example of this where even your current political crisis is caused by an American backed halt and appraisal of your democratic process caused by you daring an independent foreign policy I have no clue how you can in the context of Pakistan even try this and to saying Pakistan needs a uninterrupted democracy I say yeah go ahead it would be a matter of time before a Islamist party gets elected
We as a nation are responsible for not teaching our children about horrific conditions under British colonialism. Every western nation has a robust history curriculum, where they don't just teach facts and dates, but push the new generations to critique the mistakes of the past. How is it possible that our great grandparents suffered under such brutal, inhumane colonial powers, so many gave their lives in the process for liberation, and the moment we got freedom, there was literally ZERO effort to develop and teach a history curriculum to show everything in detail and the kind of history curriculum that would give our children confidence as Muslims, as well as hope for developing a bright future. Everyone just sits around and waits for a savior. Everyone dreams of escaping to Europe or USA because the systems there allow for financial flourishing. No one realizes that it's not the place that allows you to thrive, but the collective will and hard work of people that develop proper systems for economic prosperity. We need to start forming coalitions and create our own institutions that if managed properly, will naturally and quickly replace the old broken systems that keep people in poverty. Stop languishing in self pity. Get up, form teams based on skills and objectives, and get to work!
Three things that need to happen are
1. Secular democratic governance in real earnest
2. Take over-religiosity away from education and teach youth to ask questions; STEM subjects are crucial.
3. Empowe women; with untapped potential of half of Muslims, progress is not possible
Ask your grandparents and they will tell you that there was better Law & Order and Justice during British time
Millions of people died of famine in Bengal under the British. Under the British, means of wealth were stripped from colonial territories. It was not better under the British and Euros are in no position to lecture.
@@Farrukhsiyar159
Are you suggesting famines (failure of rains for one .more years) happened only under British.
The Deccan famine of 1630-1632 was a famine (back-to-back crop failure) during the reign of Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan leading to intense hunger, disease, and displacement in the region. About three million people died in Gujarat in the ten months ending in October 1631 while another million died around Ahmednagar.
@@deepsareen1The Man-made Bengal famines of 1770 and 1943 caused a combined death toll of approximately 12-13 million people🇧🇩.
Western schools are educating your children. No "muslim country" exists that runs on Shariah, barring Afghanistan's recent entrance to the scene... all the current "muslim countries " are nation-states that run on secular laws. They are products of the very colonialism you speak of... and you think those on the thrones aren't benefiting from it? Ofc those cowards are.
Thanks for having him over. A polite suggestion would be that before pushing up assumptions and making him defend his position. Or asking very narrow specific long questions. It would have been more helpful to first give the professor time to present his basic idea and put it in context for you, especially for the first time/ start of the conversation. And then ask questions in response to that.
Either ways it’s exciting to see these bridges develop!
More power to you!
No borders between brothers
Ibn al-Jawzī said: "If you find a darkness in your heart after you have sinned, then know that in your heart there is light, because of that light you felt darkness."
● [روضة المحبين حجم ٢، صحفة ١١٢]
thanks for inviting him, a top notch new generation scholar especially on islamic political system ... very knowledgeable indeed
To the host, can you please write down questions before hand? U spoke longer than the guest and didn’t let him finish his argument
Bring more people to talk on this topic. ❤
A very very important and often neglected topic.
Jazakallah for sharing @Eon English ❤
One Ummah ☝🏽
Bring Dr. Abu Talha Malkawi
In Sha Allah the One and Only Solution for Pakistan and Muslims across the world is Islami Inqalab & Nizam E Shariat O Khilafat 🇵🇰🏴☪️🇵🇸
Impressive EON 👍
Pls let the guests speak more.
This question itself is so wrong.. that khilafah is possible or not.?
Offcourse khilafah is possible most important , without khilafah muslims are Orphan.
For khilafah to be establish again...first Arabs need to unite as one body,one Arabia region.
For that these Arabs dictators must need to go.
You rightly say that question is wrong but then give wrong reasons for that.
We already have too much of religiosity in all walks of life and this has only led to Muslims living in Dark ages over last hundreds of years. The only developed Muslim nation has been Turkey and its progress started with abrogation of Caliphate! There are many religions in world but do you see any developed state that draws its model from religious ideology?
You’re totally right; we shouldn’t have a defeatist attitude about this. Instead of focusing on whether we can have a Khalifah, we should be asking when, where, and how we can start building the foundations and institutions to make it happen. It’s time to move past these outdated, useless and ineffective ideologies like Liberalism and Democracy (which are even older than Christianity, if not Judaism), as well as secularism and other "isms." These ideas aren’t practical, fair, or just, and they don’t provide a solid foundation for societies to thrive. Instead, they often end up benefiting a select few while allowing others to be mistreated. Is time to make the Muslim ummah lay its foundation and bring back the justice system of Allah SWT (i.e. Shariah).
The whole idea of universal Caliphate is nothing but a bullshit . Today every nation has its boundaries . Caliphate is nothing but a supremacy of Quraysh ( as clearly mentioned in hadiths ) and why would any nation want to surrender itself . Then according to you whatever is happening in Palestine and Kashmir and to other muslims is absolutely fine ( we should not seek freedom , just make a compromise that ok we both are gonna use each others resources , I mean this is what your Caliphate teaches . But , no country would like to get merged with another country . And we have a union system or a confederation wherein the countries are united but have their own individual identity but we lack it in Caliphate .
@@farhalbasu6853do you think regions in the caliphates existed as one single country?
@@captainpotato3769 What else was it ? A foreigner comes in your land, buys a house, uses your resources ( I know it's happening vice versa ) and rules upon u ( Arab or Quraysh ) destroys your culture. What worst can we have then . Kashmiris were fighting against India on these same issues. I mean no offense but Islamic political system is a threat to culture and also to your independent existence.
good podcast ,we will be soon in khilafate In Sha Allah
Zabardast! Islami Khilafat Aur Shariat Zindabad 🇵🇰🏴🇵🇸☪️🇲🇦🇮🇩
Thanks
more english podcast please...
Can you bring Professor John Mershiemr .??
❤ loved this podcast. Please more intellectuals like him
Recommendation: mawlana hassan Spiker
Shaykh asrar rashid
Mawlana anwar mangal
The best team we have 💯
Daniel H. bhai ko bulaya to ek yaqeen ka banda bulana to zaroori tha ;)
Are they like rivals? I have although once seen Daniel criticizing omar suleymani but we must never forget that though correction is necessary but we should always support people upholding islam
Please add timestamps
EON MENTIONED 🗣❤🔥🔥🔥🔥❤ WTF IS A BAD VIDEO
Bring Dr Abdul Wahid
Muslim countries are diverse in culture lunaguges colour different tribes and castes and hate among the different castes within sunnis there are multiple divisions and each division doesnt consider other division followers as muslims.
Let the guest speak bro.
The problem today is that Muslims don’t want to accept that the caliphate can only be with a man from Quraysh (Sahih Muslim 4477). Stop arguing with your leaders like Bani Israel argued with Allah appointing Talut as their king. Even Bani Israel accepted that only the children of Dawud would be their kings. You will not have a Chinese, European, or Turkic caliph. You will either accept Allahs decree or suffer perpetual humiliation. Allah has given the authority to the descendants of Ibrahim until the end of time. If you don’t like it then debate with Allah and see where that brings you..
Mate just picking a guy from the qureysh won't solve anything you have to have it even be a feasible thing before you can choose a leader or something
@@trollfacemafiagaming6036 feasible? The first caliphate wasn’t necessarily “feasible”. The reason why the Arabs accepted Quraysh to lead is because they had an honorable lineage from Quraysh and bani Hashim were the custodians of the Ka’ba. The prophet already told us that they have to be from Quraysh. When you say feasible, do you mean an economy and military? Those already exist in every single country. The only thing that Muslims have to do is just submit to someone as a caliphate. That isn’t going to happen because of sectarianism and nationalism right now. All of the tools needed for a caliphate are already here. Muslims themselves are the ones making it not feasible. Maybe if Allah sends a plague or a natural disaster in Muslim countries it’ll be more “feasible”. Maybe Muslims need to be in pain severely to realize how easily it could’ve been accomplished. Maybe Allah has already sent this umma some tests and tribulations so that they can come to their senses, yet they persist on nationalism and sectarianism. Maybe a severe earthquake would be good right about now.
@@trollfacemafiagaming6036 the only reason that it isn’t “feasible” is because Muslims simply don’t want it. If they wanted it, they wouldn’t of brought in fiat currency, corporate monopolies, western attire, western books, and adopted the western form of politics. Muslims don’t want a caliph they want to be a secular democracy. This problem is within Muslims. The feasibility of a caliphate is just as feasible today as it was 1400 years ago. The ground still produces fruit and gold and iron and wood still available on trees. Muslims want to live trike the west and imitate their way of politics and join their global trade networks. The model of a caliphate has always been understood. Nationalism and sectarianism is more important to Muslims in 2024.
❤❤❤
Can you bring Sheikh Hassan Spiker to the podcast?
Invite Mufti Menk. We wanna see him.
hein ??
You can see him on his TH-cam channel.
🌹🌹🌹❤️❤️❤️🤲🤲🤲
I thought it would be an Intellectual discussion but lost the bet, br anjum is trying to mix every thing. He has facts but with out a clear discourse he appreciates the present democratic setup and paints the mixture with an layer called academic intellectual history, in the battle of ideas it is foolishness if u try to mix every thing, he says we have to compare the different methods adopted by different movement , he Fails to appreciate that every new movement has risen to do away with the precieved short commings of the earlier one , it would be a waste of time again of we start to compare the movements that have already failed and have reached to level of compromise with the status quo. He Fails to appreciate the present world order has the basis on it hard millitary power apart from its Ideology.
At best he is an academic and will be a waste of time if he wants to make it a movement. He has not answered ur question regarding the spectrum of the failed movement from Algeria to Egypt etc.
Read his article or book lol it's much more clear Aman hindered him here as everyone isn't the type to have a quick witted back and forth some people take time
SHEIKH IMRAN HOSSEIN plzzzzzzz
Looking backwards, while walking forward is a recipe for Great Fall. Doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different result, is Einstein's definition of stupidity. Muslims are prisoners of their own device.
It is ironic that like Anjum Bhai (from Karachi) just as most of other eloquent supporters of Caliphate, actually left their Muslim homelands to emigrate to west and had this revelation about Caliphate and are now professing it from west. His belief @7:26 in Muslims being best Ummah (do we see that?) and therefore need for Caliphate is best described as "Standing in the gutter and looking at the Moon".
Pakistan is not suffering from colonialism (BTW world’s biggest and longest colonial project is in fact Ottoman Empire itself) but Military rule and absence of secular democratic institutions.
One may now say ISIS is ugly etc. but these groups got their inspiration from same Islamic theology and did attract many educated youngsters. A common hypocrisy of Islamic apologists is to view non-Muslim oppression of Muslims as a much more heinous crime them Muslims oppressing fellow Muslims.
Just look around and you will see; in Israel - Judaism vs Islam, in France (& most of Europe)- Christianity vs Islam, in India - Hinduism vs Islam, in Sri Lanka - Buddhism vs Islam, in China - Atheism vs Islam, in Myanmar - Buddhism vs Islam and in Middle East- Islam vs Islam. Islam is at the center of nearly all violent strife in world today WHY?
All religions create otherism and Islam does that most severely. The otherism only leads into counter Otherism; and that is a vicious cycle.
"A secular Muslim is someone who believes that the Creator was sufficient enough to set highly calculated mathematical and physical laws that organize planets in orbit but wasn’t sufficient enough to create laws that organize human society."
Please.
Why do you think muslims were no.1 in every field for centuries? You have to look backwards and implement what you did to become no.1 again.
Your take is centered on the orientalist approach to Islam.
As for isis these groups are extremists who misinterpret Islam to fit an agenda much like the KKK and Zionism.
Islam is at the center of many conflicts due to the absolute dominance a unified Muslim Bloc has over the rest of the world particularly Europe.
The dislike for Islam in the west is rooted in the ideological schools of liberalism branching out of the age of the enlightenment. And this was a result of the hatred of Islam by the Catholic and Protestant churches. These hatred’s from Europe have directly shaped the culture and identity of Europe towards Islam to this day, because they know Islam is much more organized than the church and can not be influenced by politics and other external factors as the church was.
The modern nation state of Israel is also a factor in the unrest in the region of the Middle East and Muslim world because when their is peace there is intellectual prosperity and when their is chaos there can be nothing other than the preservation of life and order no growth. This is done to prop up Israel as the regions leader of power and order which is all manufactured. The cia started the Arab spring, the Brit’s funded the insurrection against the Ottomans and France swooped in to north Africa with pure violence killing innocents and forcing the people to speak French so they could establish the intellectual dominance over them.
So make no mistake the fight against Islam is perpetrated intentionally
@@onnixchaney8797
Absolutely not true.
ISIS, Al Qaeda, Taliban, Al Shabab, Boko Haram, Abu Sayaf, Al Nusra, Jemmah Islamiya, Ansar Al Shariya, Ansar Bayt al Maqdis, Hamas, Hezbollah, Lashkar e Tayyiba, TTP, KGK and many such groups are deriving their inspiration from same Islamic texts (Quran and Hadiths) and popular support from Muslims despite having killed hundreds of thousands of innocent non-combatants over the world. So this passive and ineffective approach of burying the head in sand is very disingenuous. Islam due to its "Otherism" and odious repressive stuff has invited the criticism and fear amongst non believers. Remember that extremism of one kind feeds into extremism of other kind
Enlightenment arose among other things out of distancing governance and sciences from (all kinds of religion) by using Brains instead of (divine) Books and Christianity bore the brunt of it. Most ancient religions have undergone re-formation whereby the odious texts have been de-fanged. This special claim of Islam to not to be offended / challenged (for a reformation) is not tenable.
Islam is not internally uniform but sectarian (72 firqas) in practice with each sect claiming others being Kafir and professing violence against each other. If liberalism is such a bad stuff why so many Muslims are striving for entry into western liberal societies?
Modern state of Israel was created by a (two thirds) UN vote as per international law to which Arabs did not agree and started a unilateral war in 1948 (followed by wars in 1967 and 1973). Kindly recall that a much bigger partition (with much larger blood-shed and displacement / migration of refugees) took place in India around same time; so creation of Israel is not such a unique event after all. Incidentally in second case, all refugees were rehabilitated and are today generally more prosperous than locals.
(BTW Funny that leftists (foolishly; in light of past experience) and LGBTQ brigade is joining hands with Islamists without realizing that they do not gel at the basic level)
"Pakistan is not suffering from colonialism"
The modern world order is a colonial order in all but occupation and it even has that in parts (American military bases) with it's rules monetary system and international organisations set up by those previous colonisers and is rooted in their philosophy and thought , it is heavily tilted in the favour of the west and even despite that it doesn't allow other states to self govern even in the laws and system it set forth , Particular in MUSLIM countries tho not limited to them and PAKISTAN is a particular example of this where even your current political crisis is caused by an American backed halt and appraisal of your democratic process caused by you daring an independent foreign policy
I have no clue how you can in the context of Pakistan even try this and to saying Pakistan needs a uninterrupted democracy I say yeah go ahead it would be a matter of time before a Islamist party gets elected
❤