+Jeremiah Bullfrog back in 1982 they tought that using CGI was considered cheating and didn't count. On recent years they understood that was complete bullshit and accept CGI VFX. I think the guy that made those VFX got an honorary oscar for his contribution for visual effects
You'd be surprised to know that "rotoscoping" goes back to the 1930s. Maybe farther back, although I remember that Snow White was, in addition to being the first full length animation ever produced, one of the first uses of rotoscoping. (essentially animating over live action). A quick google shows it was invented in 1915. Ralph Bakshi caught shit for using it (to great effect) in an animated version of The Lord of the Rings, which I caught in the theaters before Star Wars came out. i.onionstatic.com/avclub/5611/57/16x9/960.jpg
I like how this includes the rocket pack scene in Thunderball, which was in fact filmed with a real Bell Rocket Belt, it was a stunt and not an VFX. The effects were of course used to make it look like Sean Connery was the one doing the flying. Love the video.
+Scott Manley Yep for sure. Thunderball won because of the underwater work and effects. Unfortunately those scenes are dreadfully boring, so we chose the jetpack, even though the jetpack is real. However the part where you see Connery in the pack lifting off, is an effect. So technically it works! Thanks for watching!
That's the Kubrick effect. That guy had all the time and footage in the world. He spent most of his time editing over and over and over until it was perfect.
+chris blah Because that was the period of the Space Race between the USA and the USSR. And populations on both sides were afraid that if the other side wins it they gone nuke them from space. That's why people were so interested in speculations on how space research will develop in the future.
@roland. Yeah, a lot. Mars is really in the Zeitgeist right now, with PC games/Board Games/Documentaries and movies coming out. I play a lot of boardgames and "terraforming mars" was my game of the year last year.
+Morgan Harris That's because the clip shown is from the 50th Anniversary Ultimate Collector's Edition BluRay which was remastered. Kinda like the remastered version of the old Star Wars trilogy.
+Morgan Harris It, indeed, shows how big a difference a film looks if it has been through an exhaustive remastering process. It's interesting to see how there are still black and white films released after it.
+5ch3nk I just watched Blade Runner for the first time a few weeks ago and I'm shocked it didn't win an Oscar. The visuals are still stunning twenty years later.
+Bobo411 the oscars have always been as much popularity contest as it is reward for merit, and an up-and-coming nobody like ridley scott was not gonna win over a spielberg epic juggernaut like ET. looking back this was one of the oscar's real travesties, like annie hall winning best picture over star wars, or Out of Africa winning anything XD
+oldfrend Oh definitely, but I've always associated that with the actor categories, not the more technical categories. (Also I meant thirty years, not twenty years, now I feel really fucking old haha...)
+5ch3nk Yeah and the real shitty part is that the movie it lost to? ET - which was deemed too poorly executed and was REDONE by ILM later, just like Star Wars. Terrible. It was probably hard to tell at the time, but Blade Runner was so much better visually and so much more timeless. Really a shame it didn't win.
Transformers was a terrible movie, but it had much better Effects than the golden compass. Id even say that the Transformers was a key moment in ILM's history.
+Jim McCanney Transformers effects are bad, poorely handeled and nothing new. You're imagination make you feel it was good (nanotechnology etc) but it stay shit.
lupinearsenalALT Star Wars wasn't necessarily ahead of its time, it was pretty universally loved. 2001 maybe, but not Star Wars. It was innovative for sure, but not disregarded or misunderstood.
+Pengroves I think the Lord of the Rings movies where the real game changers. Every film before that seems a bit dated to my mid-twenties eyes. Except for Jurassic Park. That one is just starting to feel a LITTLE off.
That clip from Return of the Jedi doesn't belong here. It's from the 1997 "Special Edition" which used a CGI explosion when the Death Star was destroyed (among other alterations). I was a bit angry with Lucasfilm for marketing that release as an "Oscar winner" when it contained FX shots that didn't exist in 1983.
George Lucas gets way too much credit for Starwars. The only movie he had complete control over was phantom menace, and we all know how that turned out.
12171010011010 Yeah the prequels are atrocious but don't you dare start denying George Lucas isn't responsible for creating Star wars. he gets "way too much credit" because it wouldn't exist without him dumbass.
King of Wakanda no shit it wouldn't exist, dont get emotional just because George had a lot of talented help. And honestly i only ever disliked phantom menace, the other two prequels were not bad imho
To me though, it matters most with how you use them. A proper use and combination of digital effects and practical effects will lead to the best effects. It's all about knowung where not to use it. The Star Wars prequels are great examples of when not to use digital for everything, like the entire set...
+David Curry I know, that was a travesty. Tron deserved that one without a doubt. Hell, even the original Tron should have been given more consideration.
+David Curry It wasn't even nominated! According to the IMDB-Trivia section, it was disqualified. And why? Because the Academy considered the use of computer generated effects as "cheating"...
Wow there are: 5 James Cameron movies(what a master) 4 Peter Jackson (what a wizard) 3 Steven spielberg ( A God a mong legends) 3 George Lucas (he made a small indie movie everyone loves)
i think avatar looks dated already in many scenes. in generel, real special effects, like star ships made from models, and real explosions and smoke etc. hold up better than the computer animated stuff.
God. I was giddy watching this. I was so happy seeing all my favourite movies up there. The Lord of the Rings especially since it was "Unfilmable" yet was an award powerhouse.
It's funny to see how crappy the effects are for the 1969 film "marooned" considering how "2001: A Space Odyssey" looked way better even though it came out the year before.
Those twenty years from about 1968 - 1986 were like a golden era of film for me, with the Alien, Star Wars and Indiana Jones franchises, as well as gems like 2001: A Space Odyssey and E.T.
Urry Clark Film It was a MAJOR transitional period in American film. It's now referred to as the Hollywood Renaissance and most of my favorite films are from that era
I think we forget how amazing the special effects in Who Framed Roger Rabbit were. The blending of traditional animation and live action was seamless. Completely charming, life like and fun.
sudhindra srinivas It's a great example of "effects" being used to great effect in the story. Silberman loses his marbles at that point and his world comes crashing down. Everything Sarah Connor said is suddenly not so crazy. That's the impact for me.
+Tallen Smith not gonna lie I hated both the special effects literally was just a cgi shitfest guess it was pretty good but I though both interstellar and gravity looked better xD
Tallen Smith Avatar is already starting to look dated in my opinion. Interstellar was nearly all made with Practical Effects instead of CGI so that would explain why it looks better.
My dad mentioned years ago very old movie where white horse fly. Winner of 1940 Thief in Bagdad must be it. When my dad was a kid, travelling projectionist showed movies in farm house for the villagers. So happy to find out what movie it was.
Marie Smith Spider-Man 2 was good... The rest of the Spider-Man movies on the other hand... And you really think Spider-Man 2 sucks and not Independence Day? lol
Christian B my mistake, i believe im think of the amazing spiderman two, who can keep track any more? ive also never seen independence day honestly, looks a little shitty though
That scene in Gravity where the rope is kept stretched is an abomination, they basically said "screw physics, we need the plot to go in this direction". Horrible, absolutely horrible.
Solid concept for a video series. One of those 'why didint I think of that, look at the easy views' kinda thing lol. The improvement in effects really makes itself apparent in the 50s and 60s. Leading to the pinnacle of practical effects in the 70s and 80s and lead into CGI in the 90s. It all kinda flows. Ive watched movies from all eras and genres, but thats never been so apparent to me before. Thanks.
Fantastic completion. Lots of work done well. The cut from Star Wars to Superman has excellent flow. I did find that there were a lot of shots from these films climaxes, which may not have been required to exhibit the style of the Effects. Spoilers aside, I really enjoyed this.
So, Doctor Dolittle (1967) won best visual effects, huh? Was it really that innovative back then to have two men hiding inside of a two headed llama costume?
It's crazy to see how ahead of their time and influential Stanley Kubrick was but even Spielberg to some extent even though his films were made much later. That scene in interstellar always gives me goosebumps too.
+Jake Krynock (rioPLAYBOY) The special effects in Star Wars weren't great. Lots of good practical effects, but Maz Kanada and Snoke look terrible as far as modern CGI looks.
I watched the first Oscar awards winner "Wings" a while back. It also won for Best Picture. I was really shocked and impressed with all the action and effects they did in that movie. Way before the invention of CG.
Hey everyone! We have updated this video with a TON of new content. Check it out here: th-cam.com/video/McrczhDDvkY/w-d-xo.html
Honorable mention to Tron, disqualified by the Academy for its use of CGI.
+MetFanMac Tron was so good! Thanks for watching!
+Jeremiah Bullfrog back in 1982 they tought that using CGI was considered cheating and didn't count. On recent years they understood that was complete bullshit and accept CGI VFX. I think the guy that made those VFX got an honorary oscar for his contribution for visual effects
You'd be surprised to know that "rotoscoping" goes back to the 1930s. Maybe farther back, although I remember that Snow White was, in addition to being the first full length animation ever produced, one of the first uses of rotoscoping. (essentially animating over live action). A quick google shows it was invented in 1915. Ralph Bakshi caught shit for using it (to great effect) in an animated version of The Lord of the Rings, which I caught in the theaters before Star Wars came out. i.onionstatic.com/avclub/5611/57/16x9/960.jpg
MetFanMac tron was horrible
MetFanMac Damn. How times have changed
I like how this includes the rocket pack scene in Thunderball, which was in fact filmed with a real Bell Rocket Belt, it was a stunt and not an VFX. The effects were of course used to make it look like Sean Connery was the one doing the flying. Love the video.
+Scott Manley Yep for sure. Thunderball won because of the underwater work and effects. Unfortunately those scenes are dreadfully boring, so we chose the jetpack, even though the jetpack is real. However the part where you see Connery in the pack lifting off, is an effect. So technically it works! Thanks for watching!
+Scott Manley KSP
+Scott Manley The jetpack could be considered a mechanical/practical efect.
+Scott Manley How much Delta V do you think the rocket pack would have had?
+Scott Manley For a second I thought you were going to say the effect was to make it look like Sean Connery was acting.
I think it's funny how we see 2001 space odyssey in 1968 looking amazing and then the next year we see Marooned which in comparison looks like a joke.
Jose Ramirez The thing that stood out to me as well
That's the Kubrick effect. That guy had all the time and footage in the world. He spent most of his time editing over and over and over until it was perfect.
Jose Ramirez marooned should have never made it...
MST3K did an episode of that movie. The only oscar winner on that show
You can really see how people were interrested in space travel with the picks in the 50s
+chris blah And disaster movies in the early 70s
+chris blah Because that was the period of the Space Race between the USA and the USSR. And populations on both sides were afraid that if the other side wins it they gone nuke them from space. That's why people were so interested in speculations on how space research will develop in the future.
Well we have fortunately gone back to liking it.
chris blah, it's picking back up baby.
@roland. Yeah, a lot. Mars is really in the Zeitgeist right now, with PC games/Board Games/Documentaries and movies coming out.
I play a lot of boardgames and "terraforming mars" was my game of the year last year.
I love Ben Hur in the middle of this whole reel still looking like it was made yesterday.
right?! some movies stand the test of time.
CGI wise Avatar and Inception are miles better than the Golden Compass
+Morgan Harris I thought the same thing, that thing looks beautiful!
+Morgan Harris That's because the clip shown is from the 50th Anniversary Ultimate Collector's Edition BluRay which was remastered. Kinda like the remastered version of the old Star Wars trilogy.
+Morgan Harris Noticed the same thing. As though it had been filmed yesterday, among some old looking movies.
+Morgan Harris It, indeed, shows how big a difference a film looks if it has been through an exhaustive remastering process. It's interesting to see how there are still black and white films released after it.
Of all the clips to show the 'Visual Effects' of 2001: A Space Odyssey.....
+Movies I Love (and so can you) Right? 2001 is a practical effects masterpiece and the clip they chose shows none of that.
+JonCJGFan - Full Seasons Yes and I think Matrix's famous bullet-time trick is not the one that is shown here.
+Movies I Love (and so can you) But it shows one of the most iconics parts of the movie.
The level of clarity and immediacy that Kubrick was able to achieve is hard to come by. PTA , Lynch, and few others hover around there.
+Movies I Love (and so can you) Even thought it isn't really showing the stunning VFX, the transition with marooned is so funny
I get that it's E.T. but no Blade Runner on the list is a travesty. Movie still looks better than 99.99% of the cgi you see coming out today.
+5ch3nk /watch?v=bL6hp8BKB24 unless CGI actually is great nowadays...
+5ch3nk I just watched Blade Runner for the first time a few weeks ago and I'm shocked it didn't win an Oscar. The visuals are still stunning twenty years later.
+Bobo411 the oscars have always been as much popularity contest as it is reward for merit, and an up-and-coming nobody like ridley scott was not gonna win over a spielberg epic juggernaut like ET. looking back this was one of the oscar's real travesties, like annie hall winning best picture over star wars, or Out of Africa winning anything XD
+oldfrend Oh definitely, but I've always associated that with the actor categories, not the more technical categories. (Also I meant thirty years, not twenty years, now I feel really fucking old haha...)
+5ch3nk Yeah and the real shitty part is that the movie it lost to? ET - which was deemed too poorly executed and was REDONE by ILM later, just like Star Wars. Terrible. It was probably hard to tell at the time, but Blade Runner was so much better visually and so much more timeless. Really a shame it didn't win.
Make more of these! For every award. Ever.
+Hi, Neighbor! :)
Transformers was a terrible movie, but it had much better Effects than the golden compass. Id even say that the Transformers was a key moment in ILM's history.
+Jim McCanney And The Golden Compass is an even worse movie than Transformers soooo wtf academy
+Jim McCanney terrible my ass
Transformers was so bad, but the graphics were good.
i loved that movie, i loved the trilogy, 4th one was shit though.
+Jim McCanney Transformers effects are bad, poorely handeled and nothing new. You're imagination make you feel it was good (nanotechnology etc) but it stay shit.
Let's be honest Star Wars and 2001 were ahead of its time.
lupinearsenalALT Star Wars wasn't necessarily ahead of its time, it was pretty universally loved. 2001 maybe, but not Star Wars. It was innovative for sure, but not disregarded or misunderstood.
BOLD OPINION
A movie can be ahead of its time and universally loved as well...
More credit for starwars goes to the costumes and sets than anything else, back when it came out it truly felt like you were in a whole new world
Star Wars looks pretty bad compared to the surrounding years honestly.
Independence Day was quite the game-changer
+Pengroves Terminator 2? Jurassic park?
Yes, those are also movies.
+Pengroves Though the movie is terrible.
Okay... but you know, this is a video about visual effects...
+Pengroves I think the Lord of the Rings movies where the real game changers. Every film before that seems a bit dated to my mid-twenties eyes. Except for Jurassic Park. That one is just starting to feel a LITTLE off.
Dang. Of course VFX has evolved, but VFX has EVOLVED and this video illustrates that wonderfully.
That clip from Return of the Jedi doesn't belong here. It's from the 1997 "Special Edition" which used a CGI explosion when the Death Star was destroyed (among other alterations). I was a bit angry with Lucasfilm for marketing that release as an "Oscar winner" when it contained FX shots that didn't exist in 1983.
George Lucas gets way too much credit for Starwars. The only movie he had complete control over was phantom menace, and we all know how that turned out.
12171010011010 Yeah the prequels are atrocious but don't you dare start denying George Lucas isn't responsible for creating Star wars. he gets "way too much credit" because it wouldn't exist without him dumbass.
King of Wakanda no shit it wouldn't exist, dont get emotional just because George had a lot of talented help.
And honestly i only ever disliked phantom menace, the other two prequels were not bad imho
I think credit for Star Wars whould be shared between Lucas and Ralph McQuarrie, who designed most of the ships and characters such as Vader's look.
shakestopher i know, but they were designed from George Lucas' imagination.
One with every best cinematography winner would be cool.
Subscribed, thanks for putting this together. So cool!
+52 Skillz Thanks for subscribing and for watching!
Burger Fiction Do a Soundtrack one.
You can really see how the practical holds up better than the digital effects
William Mcmeekin Note how the entire Star Wars original trilogy won and none of the Prequels did.
Henry Ambrose Same for Lord of The Ring and The Hobbit.
William Mcmeekin Meh. All of these movies still look good.
To me though, it matters most with how you use them. A proper use and combination of digital effects and practical effects will lead to the best effects. It's all about knowung where not to use it. The Star Wars prequels are great examples of when not to use digital for everything, like the entire set...
finally!! someone that understands. In just about every case its better to use a mix of both CGI and practical effects.
tmw you realize Tron, the revolutionary SFX achievement of the past 35 years, didn't win an Oscar for visual effects
+David Curry I know, that was a travesty. Tron deserved that one without a doubt. Hell, even the original Tron should have been given more consideration.
Not for visual effects but Daft Punk should have won an Oscar for original score
+David Curry It wasn't even nominated! According to the IMDB-Trivia section, it was disqualified. And why? Because the Academy considered the use of computer generated effects as "cheating"...
so many films to choose from in 1982 for best VFX. E.T, The Thing, Blade Runner, Tron. It's honestly a pretty tough choice.
That was a great trip through all this films, thank you guys for beautiful history lesson))
+KotyoK1 You bet. Thanks for watching!
That Ripley scene still gives me goosebumps. Every time.
Guile Canencia both of them
Wow there are:
5 James Cameron movies(what a master)
4 Peter Jackson (what a wizard)
3 Steven spielberg ( A God a mong legends)
3 George Lucas (he made a small indie movie everyone loves)
I'd love to see you guys do one on every Best Make-Up Winners and showcase the characters that stood out.
Alien, Aliens, Jurrasic park, Avatar, Inception still hold up extremely well.
So does 2001 and that was 1968!
I've got an unaltered 1977 star wars and the space battles still hold up they're much better than the special editions
To be fair, Avatar and Inception were relatively recent...
yea they don't hold that same level of standing the test of time. Plus imo Avatar is already starting to look dated
i think avatar looks dated already in many scenes. in generel, real special effects, like star ships made from models, and real explosions and smoke etc. hold up better than the computer animated stuff.
Yes LOTR Won them all and rightfully so
John Williams was really riding that wave.
Or the other way around.
*****
Waves don't ride people.
***** In Soviet Russia, they do.
*****
Soviet Russia rides the world.
So was James Horner.
Nice compilation down cinematic memory lane.
God. I was giddy watching this. I was so happy seeing all my favourite movies up there. The Lord of the Rings especially since it was "Unfilmable" yet was an award powerhouse.
I looooove E.T but Blade Runner is the most visual masterpiece of all time.
Except 2001: The Space Odissey.
It's certainly the best looking movie of '82...
Blade Runner was robbed, also Conan with sets designed by Ron Cobb and characters based on Frank Frazetta's paintings
Don't forget about The Thing (1982). The effects in that movie were amazing.
'82 Oscars VFX category was a scandal!
Alien was a huge step for VFX!
It's funny to see how crappy the effects are for the 1969 film "marooned" considering how "2001: A Space Odyssey" looked way better even though it came out the year before.
Those twenty years from about 1968 - 1986 were like a golden era of film for me, with the Alien, Star Wars and Indiana Jones franchises, as well as gems like 2001: A Space Odyssey and E.T.
Urry Clark Film is alien, not the alien
Urry Clark Film It was a MAJOR transitional period in American film. It's now referred to as the Hollywood Renaissance and most of my favorite films are from that era
I think we forget how amazing the special effects in Who Framed Roger Rabbit were. The blending of traditional animation and live action was seamless. Completely charming, life like and fun.
Great films! Great work! And really great video! Like
0:45 that's. Better effects then 2012"s Food Fight
That ET beat out Blade Runner still grinds my gears.
Superb effort! The T2 Judgment Day scene of Robert Patrick walking through the jail door still gives me the goose bumps.
sudhindra srinivas It's a great example of "effects" being used to great effect in the story. Silberman loses his marbles at that point and his world comes crashing down. Everything Sarah Connor said is suddenly not so crazy. That's the impact for me.
2016: Mad Max... I hope.
ApexCactus Your wish came through and they deserved it
No it did'nt... Ex Machima won Best VX
Angelo Schwenold fuck that's sucks mad Max won so many I thought it won best visuals too. It should have because it was amazing yet practical.
Nah Ex Machina but both were great mate. Ex Machina was two years before the ceremony though which was weird.
We've kind of hit a peak that we've been unable to cross around Avatar, huh?
Tallen Smith Why do you say that?
+Tallen Smith not gonna lie I hated both the special effects literally was just a cgi shitfest guess it was pretty good but I though both interstellar and gravity looked better xD
Tallen Smith Avatar is already starting to look dated in my opinion.
Interstellar was nearly all made with Practical Effects instead of CGI so that would explain why it looks better.
Nick Piper We need more practical effects.
2016: Doctor Strange
Hopfuly seeing how it got snubbed for cinematography
No way, it's the Jungle Book or Rogue One, not even a question
Nick_theFox I would be happy with Jungle Book
I will be happy with both options to be honest (if here is ain't gonna be some bullshit like with Ex Machina last year)
Nick_theFox Ex Machana had good effects but not as good as Star Wars
Great video, it struck me how much better the visual effects winners are than the best picture winners as a whole.
My dad mentioned years ago very old movie where white horse fly. Winner of 1940 Thief in Bagdad must be it. When my dad was a kid, travelling projectionist showed movies in farm house for the villagers. So happy to find out what movie it was.
One of the greatest video I have seen. This is what makes Hollywood great. Thank you for making this.
It's funny how the effects in Marooned look so dated compared to 2001: A Space Odyssey, yet it won an Oscar the very next year.
This was so entertaining. I'm a big fan of movie makeup - could you do that one next?
god, what a great list of movies
okay, spiderman 2 being the outlier
Marie Smith Spider-Man 2 was good... The rest of the Spider-Man movies on the other hand...
And you really think Spider-Man 2 sucks and not Independence Day? lol
Christian B my mistake, i believe im think of the amazing spiderman two, who can keep track any more? ive also never seen independence day honestly, looks a little shitty though
That edit from Star Wars to Superman. 👌
That scene in Gravity where the rope is kept stretched is an abomination, they basically said "screw physics, we need the plot to go in this direction". Horrible, absolutely horrible.
shingnosis the ship is un rotation
Another brilliantly conceived idea. A real pleasure to watch the evolution of visual effects in film. Thanks, guys!
+Robert Jones Appreciate it Robert!
Technology has truly come a long way!
That was fascinating to see the progression! Thanks for putting this together.
EVERY BEST SOUND WINNER. EVER. PLEASE!!!!!!
Solid concept for a video series. One of those 'why didint I think of that, look at the easy views' kinda thing lol.
The improvement in effects really makes itself apparent in the 50s and 60s. Leading to the pinnacle of practical effects in the 70s and 80s and lead into CGI in the 90s. It all kinda flows. Ive watched movies from all eras and genres, but thats never been so apparent to me before. Thanks.
Ah yes. That uncomfortable moment when dubiously-rendered talking animals beat out a Saturn V launch and zero-g space travel.
Asterra2 I love babe but apollo 13 deserved by far
So amazing the things they could do with practical effects back in the day.
I love "The ten commandments"! It's one of my all time favourite movies and the special effects were beyond incredible!
The two title errors aside (The Thief of Bagdad, Reap the Wild Wind), this is a marvelous journey. Thanks for cutting it together.
Interstellar is my favourite movie of all time
+Saleenrulz *pretends to care*
+Kamil Olszewski you're right, I wrote that comment just for you. Next time I'll try to write something more interesting.
there are a few here i forgot to watch all those years ago. thanks for the reminders!
Dr. Strange should definitely be in there for 2016...
Fantastic completion. Lots of work done well. The cut from Star Wars to Superman has excellent flow. I did find that there were a lot of shots from these films climaxes, which may not have been required to exhibit the style of the Effects. Spoilers aside, I really enjoyed this.
So, Doctor Dolittle (1967) won best visual effects, huh? Was it really that innovative back then to have two men hiding inside of a two headed llama costume?
There was more than the two headed llama in that movie, the gian snail , the giant moth , the big whale pushing the island to earth together , etc...
Its so amazing and mind blowing how much we've developed the magic of film making in under a century! We've come soo far!
That downgrade from 2001 to Marooned though 😂😂😂
Best special effects ever. Thanks for sending them to me.
it's me, or this visual effects in old movies looks better than the visual effects in the new ones?
Very neat video, simple premise but excellent execution!
It's funny how often it went from shitty to amazing to shitty to amazing...
This added some entries to my ever-growing and never-ending list of "to watch" flicks.
1st alien is fucking timeless holy shit.
Life of Pi is one of the most beautifully done films I've ever seen.
Ex Machina won in 2015
th-cam.com/video/McrczhDDvkY/w-d-xo.html :)
All time favorite video
do all the best actors winners.
It's crazy to see how ahead of their time and influential Stanley Kubrick was but even Spielberg to some extent even though his films were made much later.
That scene in interstellar always gives me goosebumps too.
Sad that the original King Kong (1933) didn't get the chance to win.
Wow that was amazing, great job!
Terminator 2 look incredible evene in 2017
Nice short collection of clips, well done
Interestellar 💙
Thanks for this. It`s a great video.
+Jefferson Luiz You bet. Thanks for watching!
Who y'all got for this year? I'm putting my money on Mad Max: Fury Road.
same!
Mad Max was a masterpiece but they will get so much shit if Star Wars loses.
I think it's a toss up between Mad Max and Star Wars. Both did great on mixing practical and CGI
+Jake Krynock (rioPLAYBOY) The special effects in Star Wars weren't great. Lots of good practical effects, but Maz Kanada and Snoke look terrible as far as modern CGI looks.
+94dfk1 That would be awesome. We love Mad Max th-cam.com/video/ETDoeEacycs/w-d-xo.html
Your editing was awesome!
wheres twilight? it has all the best vfx
You guys are sooooo goooood! Keep doing these videos!
Revenant (2015)
+Timothy Ortiz Star Wars VII
+ZMashXA Mad Max Fury Road
+Timothy Ortiz nah, Mad Max
Its going to be star wars
+Timothy Ortiz Either that one or Mad Max
Great job. I'd love to hear/see one on Best Score winners.
ILM cleaned house in the 80s
i just watched to check that the prequels didnt get anything. now i can leave happy.
So cool to see how movies matches their time and context hypes!
Wish you could've chosen to show footage of the sea battle in 1959's Ben-Hur. Great model work there.
seen all of these movies. glad my mom brought me up with the classics.
Thanks for the cool vid Phil!
thank you, some of the list bring good old memories to me..
I watched the first Oscar awards winner "Wings" a while back. It also won for Best Picture. I was really shocked and impressed with all the action and effects they did in that movie. Way before the invention of CG.
fantastic video! thank you!
I just walk through time love it thank you for this.
Spielberg, Jackson, Cameron, Nolan, and Scott all deserve so much more praise for their use of VFX
Nice job including "Star Wars Episode 4: A New Hope" then using a scene from the Special Edition. :P
Also just noticed they used the Special Edition of "Return of the Jedi" too.
nobody had to make this video, but you did... thank you.
camera quality in the 50's and 60's is surprisingly amazing