There is no Sanskrit script till now. King Asoka himself wrote his inscription in Tamil brammi, karostic, Aramaic and Greek. So Chanakya should be fake.
@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 male Arya bramin migrated to India around 1500bc. Read dna study. You will be enlighten. You mean to say king Asoka also fake, is it. Where is Asoka script and Sanskrit script. No wer found. I presume you know about Asoka inscription. And know from wer? If Chanakya was there, in which script he wrote. There was no Pali and devanagari at that time.
Yes they migrated .....dna studies proves that there is no r1n1 or steppe dna found un skeleton found in indus valley civilization.....which is dna mostly found in brahmins and kshtriyas Also thier skin colour is not indian it us much similer to persian people or indo european race Also they practise untouchbility with mainland native trible people of india form thousands of years....the day they came....even 40-50 years ago they themselves use to feel proved being aryan and use to express themselves superior than native peoples
@@அரசன்நாடார் panini developed Sanskrit grammar in about 600 BC. This is oldest grammar text for any language. Is there grammar of that sophistication available in 600 BC?
Women of ancient india studied scriptures, to name few famous female scholars like Gargi, Maitreyi, Madalsa and Bharti and their famous discourses and arguments with famous Scholars like yagwalkya, Mandan is well illustrated. Best wishes
@@tlaloqq dont necessarily think they believe in anti hindu, do believe if anything research not done well, cannot really blame them as people whove controlled the narrative for a while superimposed their beliefs onto history.
@@dapper4061 that's the only history we ever have, all over the world. It's the victors who get to write the history, not the losers. It's really quite a shame
0:13 you say the Indian subcontinent yet you only show the modern natuon of India without even showing the disputed territory. Indian subcontinent, especially in the context of ancient India should include modern countries like India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. Otherwise, good video
Sri Lanka was never a part of Bharat! Please correct ur self! We were invaded by south India for a few years that’s the only time. And even then they didn’t rule the whole island, only thieving Brits did!
Sorry to say... But women were not kept away from vedas. Gargi and maitreyi both find themselves mentioned in Upanishads discussing meta physics with yagyavalka... Not to mention the atharvaveda was partly created by a woman
oh really, you don't how much discrimination is here. did you even watch the video, it mentioned 'shudras'. they are still persecuted to date. 1% of the population owns 40% of the wealth. and persecution of minorities is really at a high point currently.
You should include Pakistan, Bangladesh will talking about Indian subcontinent,Sri Lanka can also be added. Edit: Territory conquered by Ashoka has nothing to do with modern India, I included sri lanka because of shared cultural identity and chola empire conquering sri lanka. As a south Indian for me,Chola empire >>>>>>>Mauryan Empire , no offense to Ashoka
20:20 Buddhism didn't reject Varna system completed. Buddhism also has Verna system. The sequence is Kshatriya, Brahmin, Vaishya, Shudra. So, Budhism keeps Kshatriyas on top and Hinduism keeps Brahmins on top.
Yes shows the Buddha was not half as enlightened and used his princely powers to propound his not so original thought process. His placing kshatriya as higher in the hierarchy actually disturbed the dharma based more practical and equitable system of varna- all interdependent and equal in their own way. He is possibly the precursor of the corrupt papacy.
@@indranidutta1945Totally wrong.Buddhism never patronizes the cast system. One becomes pure and genuine not by the birth,race ethnicity or caste,But by the way he behaves as a human would categorize him whether a good or bad one.Thats what Buddha has taught ! He has never put khasthriyas on top! Its a wrong and false claim by you guys
You are not a buddhsit so you don't much about it. I'm not a hindu so i don't know much about it.. but as far as I know(i'm a buddhsit) there was no varna system in buddhism.. everyone were the same and got the same treatment..
The sculpture of shiva / Pashupatinath in meditative posture is also from this period. So not just a fertility god but yoga and adiyogi are very much a part of this culture already
Me and my team have been working on a NLP model to decipher the scripts of Indus valley and let me tell you the sculptures there are actually similar to sumerian gods rather than our hindu gods
@@Naked_Sports200 this just shows that you know nth about the vedic religion and its gods the original trimurti were Aagni, Vaayu and Indra Brahma Vishnu Maheshwor are rather modern gods indus valley supposedly collapsed at around 2000 BCE and the vedic era began at around 1500 BCE
Varna does not always mean colour. For example Sanskrit alphabet is called varna-mala where is colour here. Every Sanskrit word has numerous meaning. Meaning depend on context.
There are certain things which are intranslatables yet Brits or western scholars knowingly or unknowingly interpreted and translated it as per their own understandings .
@@uncensoredhealth1453 : we already aware about that bullcrap... same theory again, but different way to impose... still not deciphered even he told that himself !!...
I would much like to hear the Indian version but alas, in America, we are only privy to what they want us to hear and see. I shall endeavor to study Indian folklore written and presented by Indian scholars in more detail. We shall see.
@t s Muthuraman How can it be possible that Ramayan and Mahabharat were codified much later than 500 AD or so. The perfect time was around 1100 AD 1200 AD when the monuments in the north were still intact. It's because and only because of Invaders we are deprived of even knowing our own history and are forced to study the glorified history of who destroyed the history. More importantly, we are on the verge of trashing away whatever still remains. Democracy and European secularism have inflicting the demographical damage at faster rates than what 1000 years of invaders didn't.
@t s Muthuraman There is not a much-preserved history of what happened in Ancient India and pre-medieval India too. As most of those were destroyed in medieval foreign rule. Except for accounts from Chinese travelers and little ruins. It's not possible that such large epics could be written without much detailed geographical research of entire India. Something which was impossible for any Individual or even a team of people in 1500 BC. Hardly anything from ancient patliputra is now archeologically found around modern Patna. But we all know it existed in its glorified form. There is a lot in history in which we don't have much evidence left to be known. Even what already exists and the history taught behind it seems fictional. For example qutub minar it's impossible to build such a high-rise thing under the lifetime of many rulers without a proper blueprint. The Hindu symbols superimposed by text from the holy Quran tell a lot of things. Historians today don't aim to explore truth but to create stories to fit certain political agendas. That's the problem otherwise it extensively explored it's not difficult to find truth.
@t s Muthuraman detail timeline can only be investigated upon archeological findings. But most of the ancient monuments and documents are already destroyed by invaders.
@t s Muthuraman I'd say don't act dumb. Every major historian considers ramayana and Mahabharat as part of Indian history. They are epic for reason. There's lots of truth in them. Of course magical elements are not true. I don't think any historian would reject these epics. Epics explain more than just story. It's also gives insights into what groups of peoples existed back then. How society worked. Lots of names like saka, Huns are taken from Mahabharat
@@-rate6326 yes u r right ......nowadys our people started to doubt our own culture,history..but easily accept european theories,aryan invasions etc.....people frm past are not that dumb to simply accept myth stories and adapt it as part of culture........ People remeber and told stories of great kings such as rama,krishna and glorified them as god......but people forgot that ancient people saw them as god and exaggarated with little add up stories and hence some western inspired idiots declared that our culture is just myth....
Saraswati river is talked about in the Vedas many times. It has now been found that this river became extent about 9 to 10000 BC. Vedas be even more older than that. Western scholars need to rewrite the history and impose on other countries or civilizations.
Can you show saraswathi river in India.and landscape mentioned in vedas oral lies.haruvatis is halmond river in Afghanistan and amudariya oxus civilization uzbekistan. Your parasitic nomad forefathers came from there.they are bandits ,who are worshipers of demonic devas ,learn zorostian first .😢😢😢😢😅😅😅😮😮
It is proven that there maybe a river flowed in northern part indian subcontinent during 10000bc..but there are proofs that river Saraswati maybe be flowed near Iran..even vedic sanskrit is 4000 years old,which is found in Iranian inscription😂
@@batman3723most of the so-called indus sites have been towards thar desert in a curved formation implying presence of a now extinct river. Seriously it's time to rewrite books. The one near Iran is Harirud river speculated due to its rock formation and perennial nature. Rigved too describes saraswati in similar way. It could however imply that the river near indus sites near thar desert was already drying at that time, leading to IVC collapse.
The Indus-Sarasvati Civilisation was according to Srimad Bhagavatam 12.1.39 a post-vedic society. The found seals which show religious depictions related to the Veda while no temples and neither private nor public sides of worshipping were found, confirm this.
This history documentary explores the fascinating roots of one of the world's oldest games, as well as Ancient India's incredible contributions to mathematics, science, and philosophy. A captivating journey through history!
Historians should check the foot of Indus river floor and Ocean beneath it, we may find some washed away evidences of scripts, sculptures and other important stuffs 🤔
Ramayana and Mahabaratha were written by Panini as per your narrations. Some say ramayana was written by valmiki. and Mahabaratha by Krishnadyipayana. Which is correct.
Ramayana and Mahabaratha were written by Panini as per your narrations. Some say ramayana was written by valmiki. and Mahabaratha by Krishnadyipayana. Which is correct.
In ancient Bharat, there was no Pakistan or Bangladesh which is the product of a religion . Strange but true. Vedic culture and philosophy were given to humanity. The word. Hindu does not exist in vedic literatures. This is a foreign terminology. Interesting and rich history of Bharat .
@MadeInHistory I have REPORTED your video for IMPROPER INFORMATION. The Map of INDIA is improper and shown incorrectly in this video. Certain parts like Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir and China-occupied-Kashmir are shown outside the Indian realm. I strongly urge you to correct this information so that the author and the channel DO NOT PROMOTE MISINFORMATION.
Most information here are wrong, about Woman not be8ng given gigher position, Sanskrit being indo euopean language( when most indian languages are based on sanskrit and no euopean language has sanskrit in is vacabulary) and Ramayana and Mahabharatha being written in 1AD.
6:00 there is a famous archeological site name rakhigari. Scientists discover a 4000years old chariot there. Then how can you sure about Arian invention
The English misspelled Indian names because they had pronunciation problems. Now the other English speakers mispronounce the misspelled words. So, where are we going with this!!!
I rarely see the steppe people in their eyes today. Although this is quite a different view, I see more middle eastern influence, which could stem from the Silk Trade Route. Not a historian or scholar, just a visitor to this planet.
8:12 prior to mauryans there was nanda empire which was unpopular. The administration is derived from there. Alexander conquest is solely built on remnants of achaemenid rule and turned back due to the vast armies in india.
ANCIENT BOOK OF BUDDHA LALIT-VISTARA WRITE THAT BUDDHA IN HIS CHILDHOOD (AROUND 600 BCE) HAS MASTERED 64 SCRIPTS OF INDIA INCLUDING ANCIENT BRAHMI AND KHAROSTHI.
@@riddunyra4373 gussa kahe ho rahe ho be ... anger is not good for health aise kar tu apna kata hua land pakkad aur hilla le paapistan .......woh bhi tel laga k ......
What about the river saraswati mentioned in the vedas and satellite imagery shows the dry river bed? Ancient civilization dating pre Harappa have been found along the saraswati river.
Generally when we arrived in Europe, India, Egypt... the prior culture dissapears.. However, normally it means acculturation and not genocide. Meaning, in India we would have kept their ancient heritage alive and their bloodlines. Normally, if they were a warring culture we would inter-marry for strength. In those days if they showed pacifity or lack of intelligence they would have been wiped out or enslaved and sold. That culture showed above average intelligence and engenuity as evidenced by the drainage system and they had a religious system already developed that peacefully managed its citizens.. Brahma, which still exist today. Because Brahma, vedas, yogas, etc.. exist today, you know that that culture survived.
Aryans DID NOT identify themselves as "White", "European", "Caucasian" , "Blonde", "Russian" or "Anatolian". For them the word "Aryan" probably meant something like "noble being" and referred to someone who sacrificed (animal sacrifice) to the "right" gods and followed their way of life (which is by the way "pagan" and "demonic" according to Judeo-Christian doctrine). Given all of this you are NOT in any position to identify your self as an Aryan culturally. (So, the "we" of your comment's "generally when "we" arrived..........." is invalid and it is highly unlikely that someone related to your ancestral blood line arrived in Indus valley anyway). [ If you really want to "re-identify" yourself as an Aryan, you may wish begin by taking few steps: 1) Worship the right godS. 2) Perform annual and monthly animal sacrifice. 3) Install caste system in your country. (Something like: University profs on top to Janitors in bottom on that rank scale) 4) NO inter-caste marriage. (Zero mixing of genes) ]
Brahui came to Western India during medieval times. Many authors highlight the Dravidian speaking Brahui tribe that inhabits the modern region of Balochistan in Pakistan and is close to the Indus valley. One of the arguments is that the Brahuis may represent the remnants of the early Dravidian inhabitants of the Indus valley who were later Aryanized or driven off. But, there are also people who argue that the Brahuis were later medieval migrants to the north from Central India. This is possible because only around 15% of Brahui vocabulary contains Dravidian words and it also does not contain any early Indo-Aryan or early Iranian loan words. So, it means that the Brahuis were not present in the Balochistan region during the early Indo-Aryan Vedic and Old Iranian period. The oldest layer of loan words in Brahui language is from later languages such as Balochi, Sindhi, etc. that evolved during the medieval era. Thus, this could indicate that Brahui migration towards the north would have happened only during medieval times. Also, we have late arrivals of Dravidian languages such as Kurukh in far northern regions like Nepal. Most authors agree that the Kurukh had its original seat in central India and migrated to the north later. Similar would be the case of Brahui migrants.
@@tsmuthuraman9637 You don't even understand the language of Brahui. You are only obsessed with Aryan Migration Theory. I wish you do the same scrutiny when a western/european scum bag puts forward his theory on India. Read this carefully. The oldest layer of loan words in Brahui language is from later languages such as Balochi, Sindhi, etc. that evolved during the medieval era. Thus, this could indicate that Brahui migration towards the north would have happened only during medieval times. Also, we have late arrivals of Dravidian languages such as Kurukh in far northern regions like Nepal. Most authors agree that the Kurukh had its original seat in central India and migrated to the north later. Similar would be the case of Brahui migrants.
@@TingTong2568 Just go through the etymology of brahui language😂. It is already proved. Go and brush up ur knowledge. When it is ours we will only claim!! Why do we claim everything? We are claiming everything with proof and we are the ancient civilization of this world. Dont be jealous others are just invaders , got attracted to the rich advanced civilization and started invading us! Still Indian govt(Aryans) are invading thamizh people's treasures 😂😂😂
@@thanu-go1ts etymology? Brahui language only has 15% Dravidian substratum. Not more than that. Plus, having a slight Dravidian essence dosen't mean it's Tamil. Duh.
it is wrong to say that women were not allowed to study veda, and they were not taugh to read. in contrast the diety of veda and learnig is a goddes "saraswati" there are lots of veda written by women.
I personally believe that they originated in India because the supposed Indo-Aryans wrote the Vedas and they always state that their ancestors were always from India ( for that, check hinduism in google. Not youtube. Most told in youtube is not true.).
How can it be possible that Ramayan and Mahabharat were codified much later than 500 AD or so. The perfect time was around 1100 AD 1200 AD when the monuments in the north were still intact. It's because and only because of Invaders we are deprived of even knowing our own history and are forced to study the glorified history of who destroyed the history. More importantly, we are on the verge of trashing away whatever still remains. Democracy and European secularism have inflicted demographical damage at faster rates than what 1000 years of invaders didn't.
@t s Muthuraman It doesn't seem like that. That era was not about the destruction of one civilization to put another. This is the nature of Abrahamic religions. Read the history of pre-Islamic arab you will get the same. The pagans worshipped many gods and goddesses, much like in India, and plurality was allowed. Modern kaba was the holy sanctuary to many deities. Similarly, the ancient Dravidians had their own deities, as we can see some from Harrapan excavations. Lord Pashupatinath and many other deities. What's likely that later when Aryans came, they brought their own set of deities. It's also possible that the Vedas were in oral traditions for a very long time, and its founder would have been the Dravidians from the Indus valley. Which might have been codified when later. One civilization meeting with another was more likely mingling with another and exchanging goods and ideas in the ancient world. The exchange of goods, knowledge, and ideas was much more common in even the pre-civilized world. The rigid hardcore religion aimed to convert people and replace knowledge, culture, and history is not common in the Indian subcontinent and ancient world. Until much later, when Abrahamic religions arrived, which were political tools rather than philosophical liberal collections of ideas that were constantly intellectually debated is IN India we had. The major culprit for the destruction of diversity and pluralistic societies are politically mobilizing hardcore belief framework which demands surrender and is considered beyond intellectual discourse. Something that was never common in ancient pagan polytheistic societies. You don't need to go to history to verify it. The modern-day is a living example of it. How missionaries destroyed indigenous traditions of tribes in Africa and worldwide. The folk traditions/ language/art ideas are suffering across the globe. The native Americans, and Australians have lost most of it. While wherever the Indic dharmic traditions spread, they created a new form mingling with native folk traditions and pre-existing culture. For example, Balinese Hinduism. And forms of Buddhism.
I think this history is or was written by British professors just read ancient books or come to some gurukul u will get some real knowledge by which knowledge india becomes the super power in ancient times
Well , you should know who discovered indus vally civilization and asoka the great Gurukulas didn’t have clue about such So be more liberal when its about learning 🙏
@@Soaringsky379 there were hadappa,indus valley, a wel stuctured civilization, weapons tools, lot more things and u said there was no gurukul go read ramayan, mahabharat u will got the gurukul evedance and if u don't believe our books then read chinease traveller's who came thousands of year before like fahiyan and all they will give u the clue of war of Mahabharat...
If your Gurus are of so great knowledge how comes that nobody understands the real meaning of the Veda today? Even in the Brahmanas the Rics (Mantras) were just taken out of their original context and used for the sacrificial purposes of the Brahmins. Everybody can see this in the Brahmanas. And this obviously means that the Brahmins (unlike the Rishis!) were not able to create own Rics!
@@penoge who said nobady can understand ved ? But to understand ved first u need a strong grip on sanskrit and not the simple today's sanskrit but panini ashtadhyayi vyakaran then read nighantu, shastr etc.. u have to understand a complete chain of books then at last u can translate meaning of vedic mantr ,,,, also u have to be a yogi ( smadhisth) person to gain the meaning of words ,mantra
Western people should be weary of these people. They will learn from them and later will be outsmarted by them, like what happened in Indua before the foreign steppie people.
@ArmanAditya Basu their legacy does not say so. It is better to consider them as foreign steppie and the culture introduced as foreign. It is right to have this in the preamble set right so that no class is high or low or entitled. This is important, and the country needs it to have a homogeneous identity.
@ArmanAditya Basu legacy and stratification, unhealthy culture. Vedic is foreign but the previous culture just blended in with the natives and created a homogeneous identity only to be destroyed by those who believed in prejudiced minded Gods.
Odd that they don't seem to recognize that "raja" is a cognate of the Latin "rex" - I.e. they're basically the same word and both are typically translated as "king". "Maharaja" means "great king" ("maha" is a cognate with the Greek "mega") and the phrase "maharaja di raji" ("great king of kings") was a very common title claimed by the rulers of great empires throughout the Bronze and Iron ages.
@@indranidutta1945 Nonsense. The scientific evidence is clear. Both evolved from slightly different strains of Proto Indo-European (from East and west of the Urals) spoken by related horse-focused nomadic peoples on the Eurasian steppes in the preceding millenium or so. To claim otherwise makes as little sense as those who claim humans descended from chimps.
Aryans never invaded or come from outside..people of jambudwipa are called arya Islamic invasion happens not aryan invasion..british created wrong notion
If women were not allowed to study in the Vedic period then who were Lopamudra, Gargi and Maitreyi? Which period were they from? Also the term 'Arya' is Sanskrit means sir, a polite form of addressing each other. In Sanskrit the term 'Arya' does not depict any ethnicity or race. The term "Aryans" was coined by the west, particularly the British. Also FYI the term 'Dravid' is a geographical term depicting the Deccan plateau and not a race, again another ploy by the colonial British to divide the country further.
We must use common sense,have we ever care about history of Africa,china or Europe?! There are so many verses written in vedas by women and then these people..
You say they had civilization in India in 2600 BC. So what language did they speak in 2600s since they had civilization. Civilization starts with language the people got to have a way to communicate with each other. The crazy thing is a European is telling the story about India, Indian people. And not the from India. Why do the India Indians allow the Europeans to tell their stories and not themselves? Have India Indians ever been conquered by the Europeans?
@@andrelove9634 it is still not clear what the language was called many have tried classifying it under different language families especially the Dravidian but however it very hard to know the name of a language which was spoken more than 3000 years ago there is a script though. Archeologists are still trying to understand what could those scripts mean. And also you said that civilization starts from language that's not true, language starts much before civilization a civilization might add more variations and complexities to the language through literature, poetry etc. So if a civilization is discovered it is quite obvious that they will have a language people can not build huge cities without a language.
If you think primitively. You will begin to understand that, the reason most cultures have worshipped the bull/cow, is because of his virility and her nursing abilities. And both for their strength.
@@11_jesusisking yes it's true In ancient Babylonia, Mesopotamia, Sumerian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Indian, Egyptians, Mayans, Incas, Aztecs used to worship Mother Cow and Bull just because they were easy way to farm and Feed and non dangerous animals 🙏
Have u heard about jallikattu? Where when India tried to ban our authentic sport jallikattu, the protest that we thamizh people did here were one such incident that will never be forgotten. Indus valley has many evidences related to the bull where jallikattu is practiced and same things are found in keezhaddi and adhichanllur excavations in Tamilnadu. It is already proved to be a thamizh civilization. Thamizh civilization had an influence in many countries where korea, chinese, japan etc were influenced by thamizh civilization. And even these foreign countries have accepted their cultural adoption from tamils.
@@thanu-go1ts Tamizh Kings saw themselves as the citizen of Bharat. They spread Sanskrit. Tamil is a great language but if you attack other Indian shades then you are a complete fool.
@@phoenixj1299 nobody is attacking anyone. Im talking the truth. When did tamil kings spread sanskrit? Which kings did? Don't talk about later cholas or pandiyas..some of them are not native tamils,they are telugu mixed breed. They bought sanskrit,inside temples not the native tamil kings.
Classes are based on work how ever GOTRA in based on birth It is a way to keep track of blood line And AVOID COUSIN MARRIAGE As it has many health related issues.
Pillars of Eastern civilization: Brahmacharya/celibacy, Non-duality or advaita meaning God is not seperate from the world around, might does not make it right etc Pillar of Western civilization: Hard work, scientific research, the idea that matter and God are seperate from each other, might makes it right, the idea of human body as a tool of enjoyment and as a cog in a machine for a collective goal etc
Are you saying hard work and scientific research are not good? And since when does Hinduism not brag on science in the Mahabharata? And where did you come up with the idea that we believe God and matter are separate? And have you read the Kama Sutra?
@@moorek1967 he never said that. He just stated the characteristics of both civilization. That's all. There are good and bad things in both civilizations.
According to this kingdoms were founded in india around 1500 BC. Nasa found and carbon dated a bridge between India and sri Lanka to be 10000 years old which makes it around 8000 BC time. Who ever made this video get your time line right.
This history is so misleading, the mention of the South Indian kingdom or Dravidian culture is not mentioned at all. This is so North Indian centric and is very disappointing and misleading.
There are lots of evidence proves that Aryans came outside of India. Any they created the Varna system for dominated the indigenous people of India which are looks gray,brown,or black in colour
Exactly the indegenious people of this country are Thamizh civilization,still these aryans are in power in India and they still discriminate us. They very well know everything just making people fool with hindutva idealogies
At least in Rwanda they divided ethnicities but targeted philosophies here, they give a pass to other Abrahamics that were focused on conquering and violence at every angle, and we have no support, nor do we speak up as much as AA in the USA for example, btw I was born in a Sikh family and consider myself Dharmic that were focused on inner peace, this respect Abrahamics don’t understand. The word “casta” is in Portuguese and English, and actually widened the outside or untouchabIe gaps, we were their biggest target during the Indian Ocean slave trade and inquisition. Spirituals and tribaIs are targets to brainwash. Our greatest strength and weakness was believing all gods are gurus, so far they’ve only manipulated. We need to shed the habits and labels as much as possible also. The system was a part of Manusmriti not Gita or reIigious, CH18 passages 40-45, which also simply points to the brain/chest/arms/legs to reach enlightenment and based on karma or deeds, nirvana is the ultimate goal in human life that also breaks the reincarnation cycle, similar to the chakra system and meditation. It’s a compass or a family that completes itself and equal. From the oldest civilizations, it remained the steadiest due to dharma. It experienced every invasion and was probably the only genealogy for a billion people. People started adding surnames…etc afterwards that didn’t exist during ancient times, for example I was born Sikh and last names are important in the community. The Mughals were the first to manipulate it to identify “paak” or pure, did colorism, forced my Chamar community to sweep when they refused to convert and today the stigma continues. Today they have a country that attacked others as they were leaving during the 47 partition. The CathoIic system and missionaries called them pagan, they can’t hide evidence of ancient civilizations, they believe Adam and Eve were first, they believe they were created for them to see the light or change, basically pagans are property, like how another Abrahamic calls others reverts when it was the youngest, pure narcissism. Brain wash occurs by painting own bad first, how these mission groups work. The current system is more similar to theirs, each church was its own system, starting with the pope on top, priests, bishops and nuns at bottom. This is the oldest and largest denomination. During the colonial period it was primarily industrialization based, but the British royal hierarchy was a representation and in power, it was enforced in society with the Criminal Tribes Act of 1871 that labeled certain communities as criminals. Herbert Hope Risley measured nasal bridges to racially divide classes and created the Aryan versus Dravidian theory. Arthur de Gobineau claimed British soldiers were above and manipulated priests for control. It was a way for them to plagiarize ancient civilizations, because Dharma was the oldest, HitIer claimed Nordics came down and built them, when the migration was upwards. They normally give preference to biblical regions or Egypt where Moses was born in general. Till this day we use their definitions and tiers of “lndo-Aryan” languages, which they claim means European, when Sanskrit and TamiI were both the oldest recorded. Now a lot of insecure neighbors play with it as well. We should protect native paganism and be proud it’s among the oldest recorded regardless, it remained the steadiest due to dharma. Dharma philosophies believe in all paths lead to same destination and all gods are gurus, didn’t try to change others or spread but inner peace, quaIity not quantity, but know basic survival. Why the nation is a democracy, colorful and always in celebration. It evolved with Mother Earth and respected goddesses, animals and nature. It is science based, for example the 10 avatars of Vishnu resembIe the Darwin theory of evolution. Can also be an Atheist or astika/nastika. Also varna is based on birth, others go by moksha or reincarnation and scripts says karma or deeds.
Varna does not mean only color. It means types or varieties. Caste system was always present in India. It was not imposed by a tiny population of Brahmins and kshatriyas. It was codified by Brahmins through Manusmriti.
Since Manusmriti was written by Brahmins so they self define them as highest rank and defined others as lowest rank. In our ancient tamil we don't have Varna based on the any Dharma Shastra. It is only based on the work they do they defined based on the lands which they live like Kurinji, Mullai, Marutham, Neithal and Paalai.
The idea that Buddhism was for lower class people and Hinduism was for upper caste is absolute bullshit. In fact much of the "33 million gods" are because of individual deities of families . Hinduism does not have 33 million gods as terms of institution. On the other hand Buddhism was quite elite. It required initiation and going in an monastery . Thats why you have buddhist monasteries where as Hinduism did not have any. Also, Buddhism being for egalitarian is also crap as much of the immediate Buddhist followers themselves reveled in being upper caste and that Buddha himself was of upper caste. Buddhism was never meant to cut across cast. What is was was the rejection of ritualistic aspects of the Vedas . This is not to create a rift between the two categories of philosophies but this information is totally misleading
Even Ashoka the great Couldn't able to conquer the South INDIA . Because there lived dravidans , Dravidans are more superior than these . Please make a Video about dravidans
So, there it is. More steppe peoples, and this time those originally from yuezhi, pushed peoples southward, the Kushans, who were themselves living in Bacteria, into what is northern India today. More foreign blood, therefore, from more central Asian regions came into India and mixed with the people already living there. Indians if today have genes from all these peoples from as long ago as the Harrapans to the Greeks to the Persians (multiple times) to these Turko-Mongols. Not easy to figure it all out, but the history reveals light on the subject.
Vedic scriptures has no foreign memory at all, except land of SAPTSINDHU( Current Punjab. Haryana , etc.). Kushan etc adopted indian culture and propagated it.
Very interesting. I write in the field of religious studies and find both the comment of Prof. Bennet and replies consistent with my learning both academic and in practice. Thank you very much for this video.☘️
the video is full of non sense, dont believe it. There is nothing like 5th varna. There are only 4 varnas. That is basically classification of work force. It based on the skills not on birth. later on it became Birth based. Caste Discrimination had been there. Would like to provide information along with Proofs if you want to learn.
West compares religion born in Indian subcontinent with their Abrahamic religion. When will they understand that religion here(can be seen as different path to moksha or nirvana) have a deeper meaning and purpose it's nothing like christianity or islam
This is just bullshit. The Europeans brought the Aryan invasion theory for their vested interests. It's not supported by archaeology or genetics. Now you're just repeating it. Varna in this context doesn't mean colour. Varna means what's opted and accepted based on the inherent qualities. In Sanskrit, words have different meanings. And the Varnasrama system consists of only 4. Brahmana, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shudra. Whoever not included in the first three fall under the fourth. This was an unnecessary video.
@@hannahpocock4152 but they are used for Indians According to me history of the world Is That all civilization use to do idol worship Fire rituals But l think civilization still exists in India Bcs other countries have lost there culture
Bhagavad Gita 4-13, lord Krishna says that he created different varnas on the basis of one's Karma (activity) and Guna (quality) not by birth but some powerful people during ancient times misused their powers and created a caste system by birth.🕉️🙏🙏
I a Aryan Sinhalese Buddhist from Sri Lanka Colombo I love Indian History Where Sri Lanka Maha Baratha mutual connections had for many thousand years and Aryans arrived with Prince Vijaya and With Emperor Asoka sent his son and daughter to Sri Lanka to promote Buddhism in Sri Lanka 2500 ago Sri Lanka was ruled by Sinhalese Buddhist great Kings for over 2500years till British captured entire Lanka in 1815 gained independence in 1948
You need more research on this subcontinent history. Better discuss with locals north & south. Don't mix religions in it. Look at the kings & queens and their language, tradition and power.
Nonsense! The Tamils came with Manu Vaivasvata to India who was king of the Dravidians in Tretayuga before he came by ship to India in the great flood which ended the Tretayuga and the Chakshusha Manvantara and became Manu in Dvaparayuga.
Trying to connect some geological events to scripture to make it authentic even though there is no connection between the written text and history. It is like saying the thermonuclear weapons today had history with puranic wars.
Do you believe the Indo-Aryans migrated to India or did they originate there?
There is no Sanskrit script till now. King Asoka himself wrote his inscription in Tamil brammi, karostic, Aramaic and Greek. So Chanakya should be fake.
@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 male Arya bramin migrated to India around 1500bc. Read dna study. You will be enlighten. You mean to say king Asoka also fake, is it. Where is Asoka script and Sanskrit script. No wer found.
I presume you know about Asoka inscription. And know from wer? If Chanakya was there, in which script he wrote. There was no Pali and devanagari at that time.
Yes they migrated .....dna studies proves that there is no r1n1 or steppe dna found un skeleton found in indus valley civilization.....which is dna mostly found in brahmins and kshtriyas
Also thier skin colour is not indian it us much similer to persian people or indo european race
Also they practise untouchbility with mainland native trible people of india form thousands of years....the day they came....even 40-50 years ago they themselves use to feel proved being aryan and use to express themselves superior than native peoples
Originate there
@@அரசன்நாடார் panini developed Sanskrit grammar in about 600 BC. This is oldest grammar text for any language. Is there grammar of that sophistication available in 600 BC?
Women of ancient india studied scriptures, to name few famous female scholars like Gargi, Maitreyi, Madalsa and Bharti and their famous discourses and arguments with famous Scholars like yagwalkya, Mandan is well illustrated. Best wishes
yeah this vid is great but has a weird anti hindu flavor
@@tlaloqq dont necessarily think they believe in anti hindu, do believe if anything research not done well, cannot really blame them as people whove controlled the narrative for a while superimposed their beliefs onto history.
Even before vedic scripture got famous..there are hundreds of tamil female writers existed
WHITE people never admit that.
@@dapper4061 that's the only history we ever have, all over the world. It's the victors who get to write the history, not the losers. It's really quite a shame
0:13 you say the Indian subcontinent yet you only show the modern natuon of India without even showing the disputed territory. Indian subcontinent, especially in the context of ancient India should include modern countries like India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. Otherwise, good video
he is a typical white western racist
Afghanistan too
Sri Lanka was never a part of Bharat! Please correct ur self!
We were invaded by south India for a few years that’s the only time. And even then they didn’t rule the whole island, only thieving Brits did!
True. He is not showing right map
Yes lots of gaps in the narrative and translation not necessarily due to fa hiens interpretation of the times
Sorry to say... But women were not kept away from vedas. Gargi and maitreyi both find themselves mentioned in Upanishads discussing meta physics with yagyavalka... Not to mention the atharvaveda was partly created by a woman
I love India. Great people with amazing history.
oh really, you don't how much discrimination is here. did you even watch the video, it mentioned 'shudras'. they are still persecuted to date. 1% of the population owns 40% of the wealth. and persecution of minorities is really at a high point currently.
Thank you , you are welcome in India anytime 🙏🏼
I think India has a lot of the smartest people on the planet...
And racist
@@BD091959 Where? In Australia, Canada, UK, US, Fiji?
In Kerala "Marumakathayam" existed matriarchal society in kingdom of Travancore and in kingdom of Cochin.
You should include Pakistan, Bangladesh will talking about Indian subcontinent,Sri Lanka can also be added.
Edit: Territory conquered by Ashoka has nothing to do with modern India, I included sri lanka because of shared cultural identity and chola empire conquering sri lanka.
As a south Indian for me,Chola empire >>>>>>>Mauryan Empire , no offense to Ashoka
It shows their history knowledge is limited 🙄
Manner please!!!!🙏
@Know One he did mention Pakistan. The indus is mostly in Pakistan.
Mohenjo Daro is in present day Pakistan brother.
They all were part of ancient India
@@niningsetia4213 what manners
20:20 Buddhism didn't reject Varna system completed. Buddhism also has Verna system. The sequence is Kshatriya, Brahmin, Vaishya, Shudra. So, Budhism keeps Kshatriyas on top and Hinduism keeps Brahmins on top.
Yes shows the Buddha was not half as enlightened and used his princely powers to propound his not so original thought process. His placing kshatriya as higher in the hierarchy actually disturbed the dharma based more practical and equitable system of varna- all interdependent and equal in their own way. He is possibly the precursor of the corrupt papacy.
@@indranidutta1945Totally wrong.Buddhism never patronizes the cast system.
One becomes pure and genuine not by the birth,race ethnicity or caste,But by the way he behaves as a human would categorize him whether a good or bad one.Thats what Buddha has taught !
He has never put khasthriyas on top! Its a wrong and false claim by you guys
You are not a buddhsit so you don't much about it. I'm not a hindu so i don't know much about it.. but as far as I know(i'm a buddhsit) there was no varna system in buddhism.. everyone were the same and got the same treatment..
@@අරියසච්චානදස්සනංevidence is far clearer in pre CCP Tibetan Buddhism. They were casteist beyond any example in Hinduism.
@@MegaAshfireTibetian example is not a part of Gautam Buddha's teaching.
The sculpture of shiva / Pashupatinath in meditative posture is also from this period. So not just a fertility god but yoga and adiyogi are very much a part of this culture already
Me and my team have been working on a NLP model to decipher the scripts of Indus valley and let me tell you the sculptures there are actually similar to sumerian gods rather than our hindu gods
@@marcus.the.youngerWhat about Abaddon aka Shiva the destroyer what about that?
@@marcus.the.youngershow the data. Proof
@@marcus.the.youngergood luck with deciphering ivc script 😂
@@Naked_Sports200
this just shows that you know nth about the vedic religion and its gods
the original trimurti were Aagni, Vaayu and Indra
Brahma Vishnu Maheshwor are rather modern gods
indus valley supposedly collapsed at around 2000 BCE and the vedic era began at around 1500 BCE
Varna does not always mean colour. For example Sanskrit alphabet is called varna-mala where is colour here. Every Sanskrit word has numerous meaning. Meaning depend on context.
lingam means lund
Don’t expect a westerner to understand that.
Varna is profession
There are certain things which are intranslatables yet Brits or western scholars knowingly or unknowingly interpreted and translated it as per their own understandings .
@@Proud_Pagan
caste system is evil and it proves hinduism is shittttttt
This feels a coloniser’s view of ancient India…
9:43 The Sanskrit term varna is derived from the root vṛ, meaning "to cover, to envelop, count, classify consider, describe or choose"
Excellent summary! Well done!
Hopeless History. This description has no fundamental basis and is constructed on biased western stereotyping.
Archeological , biological evidences are already there
@@uncensoredhealth1453 Like what ?
@@uncensoredhealth1453 : we already aware about that bullcrap... same theory again, but different way to impose... still not deciphered even he told that himself !!...
I would much like to hear the Indian version but alas, in America, we are only privy to what they want us to hear and see. I shall endeavor to study Indian folklore written and presented by Indian scholars in more detail. We shall see.
@@saltycreole2673 Indian history is written British colonizers and propagated by Indian communist historians.
MAHABHARAT is our history, its living evidences can be found easily and here 7:34 these all Janapadas actually are part of Mahabharat.
@t s Muthuraman How can it be possible that Ramayan and Mahabharat were codified much later than 500 AD or so. The perfect time was around 1100 AD 1200 AD when the monuments in the north were still intact. It's because and only because of Invaders we are deprived of even knowing our own history and are forced to study the glorified history of who destroyed the history. More importantly, we are on the verge of trashing away whatever still remains. Democracy and European secularism have inflicting the demographical damage at faster rates than what 1000 years of invaders didn't.
@t s Muthuraman There is not a much-preserved history of what happened in Ancient India and pre-medieval India too. As most of those were destroyed in medieval foreign rule. Except for accounts from Chinese travelers and little ruins. It's not possible that such large epics could be written without much detailed geographical research of entire India. Something which was impossible for any Individual or even a team of people in 1500 BC.
Hardly anything from ancient patliputra is now archeologically found around modern Patna. But we all know it existed in its glorified form. There is a lot in history in which we don't have much evidence left to be known. Even what already exists and the history taught behind it seems fictional. For example qutub minar it's impossible to build such a high-rise thing under the lifetime of many rulers without a proper blueprint. The Hindu symbols superimposed by text from the holy Quran tell a lot of things. Historians today don't aim to explore truth but to create stories to fit certain political agendas. That's the problem otherwise it extensively explored it's not difficult to find truth.
@t s Muthuraman detail timeline can only be investigated upon archeological findings. But most of the ancient monuments and documents are already destroyed by invaders.
@t s Muthuraman I'd say don't act dumb. Every major historian considers ramayana and Mahabharat as part of Indian history. They are epic for reason. There's lots of truth in them. Of course magical elements are not true. I don't think any historian would reject these epics. Epics explain more than just story. It's also gives insights into what groups of peoples existed back then. How society worked. Lots of names like saka, Huns are taken from Mahabharat
@@-rate6326 yes u r right ......nowadys our people started to doubt our own culture,history..but easily accept european theories,aryan invasions etc.....people frm past are not that dumb to simply accept myth stories and adapt it as part of culture........
People remeber and told stories of great kings such as rama,krishna and glorified them as god......but people forgot that ancient people saw them as god and exaggarated with little add up stories and hence some western inspired idiots declared that our culture is just myth....
This ancient history documentary offers a fresh perspective on events I've read about countless times. Truly enlightening!
12:25 that's some European abrahamic bs. Women were allowed to study and there were many lady scholars. Even a Wikipedia search will tell you that.
What are your sources........bcoz women were allowed to study Vedas we have accounts of them
Saraswati river is talked about in the Vedas many times. It has now been found that this river became extent about 9 to 10000 BC. Vedas be even more older than that. Western scholars need to rewrite the history and impose on other countries or civilizations.
Can you show saraswathi river in India.and landscape mentioned in vedas oral lies.haruvatis is halmond river in Afghanistan and amudariya oxus civilization uzbekistan. Your parasitic nomad forefathers came from there.they are bandits ,who are worshipers of demonic devas ,learn zorostian first .😢😢😢😢😅😅😅😮😮
It is proven that there maybe a river flowed in northern part indian subcontinent during 10000bc..but there are proofs that river Saraswati maybe be flowed near Iran..even vedic sanskrit is 4000 years old,which is found in Iranian inscription😂
@@batman3723what?
@@batman3723most of the so-called indus sites have been towards thar desert in a curved formation implying presence of a now extinct river. Seriously it's time to rewrite books.
The one near Iran is Harirud river speculated due to its rock formation and perennial nature. Rigved too describes saraswati in similar way. It could however imply that the river near indus sites near thar desert was already drying at that time, leading to IVC collapse.
Watching this ancient history documentary felt like a time machine experience. The accuracy and detail are superb!
watched all of it, good history lesson
Mostly propaganda of colonial and leftist Historians.
The Bull is likely worshiped because Vedic India evolved during the Age of Taurus (see precession of the equinoxes).
As jallikattu proves the southern and northern cultures were already one composite culture with the Indus Valley
@StarPlanet56789 And they spoke tamil. At least stop this whatsapp spamming.
@StarPlanet56789Both Tamils and North Indians are descendants of IVC?
The Indus-Sarasvati Civilisation was according to Srimad Bhagavatam 12.1.39 a post-vedic society. The found seals which show religious depictions related to the Veda while no temples and neither private nor public sides of worshipping were found, confirm this.
This history documentary explores the fascinating roots of one of the world's oldest games, as well as Ancient India's incredible contributions to mathematics, science, and philosophy. A captivating journey through history!
Historians should check the foot of Indus river floor and Ocean beneath it, we may find some washed away evidences of scripts, sculptures and other important stuffs 🤔
Ramayana and Mahabaratha were written by Panini as per your narrations. Some say ramayana was written by valmiki. and Mahabaratha by Krishnadyipayana. Which is correct.
Ramayana and Mahabaratha were written by Panini as per your narrations. Some say ramayana was written by valmiki. and Mahabaratha by Krishnadyipayana. Which is correct.
Maybe ask your govt to fund researcher for this task.
My Question is , Where was Dharma and Hinduism started was it outside of India or was it with the Aryans that migrated into india?
In ancient Bharat, there was no Pakistan or Bangladesh which is the product of a religion . Strange but true.
Vedic culture and philosophy were given to humanity.
The word. Hindu does not exist in vedic literatures. This is a foreign terminology.
Interesting and rich history of Bharat .
Neither was a Bharat than or whatever you mean by ancient Bharat
@@RachaelWill🤡
@@Handle_Edit i can understand your pussynaturethattellyoutobeatrollbutstopitiscringey
This is wrong map of India shown here. Please correct this urgently!!
I think u have studied too much of max mular Aryan invasion theory 😡
@MadeInHistory
I have REPORTED your video for IMPROPER INFORMATION.
The Map of INDIA is improper and shown incorrectly in this video. Certain parts like Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir and China-occupied-Kashmir are shown outside the Indian realm.
I strongly urge you to correct this information so that the author and the channel DO NOT PROMOTE MISINFORMATION.
Yes people from India traveled to other parts of the world and made civilizations.
Most information here are wrong, about Woman not be8ng given gigher position, Sanskrit being indo euopean language( when most indian languages are based on sanskrit and no euopean language has sanskrit in is vacabulary) and Ramayana and Mahabharatha being written in 1AD.
It is not Ganges but river Ganga (गंगा)
Calm your tits. It's ganges
Its not india its bharat! Similarly.....
6:00 there is a famous archeological site name rakhigari. Scientists discover a 4000years old chariot there. Then how can you sure about Arian invention
They can divide people but can't unite..
@Its in Sinauli not Rakhigiri
@t s Muthuraman not really. You have to look into development of vedas to know that.
Kindly provide link of episode 1 and the remaining....
Episode 1 is here:
th-cam.com/video/fWEuz6rrfcY/w-d-xo.html
It is also in the Playlist link in the Description
The English misspelled Indian names because they had pronunciation problems. Now the other English speakers mispronounce the misspelled words. So, where are we going with this!!!
The video is prepared without proper knowledge in the ancient history of India . There is no mention of Dalits in any ancient Indian text .
I rarely see the steppe people in their eyes today. Although this is quite a different view, I see more middle eastern influence, which could stem from the Silk Trade Route. Not a historian or scholar, just a visitor to this planet.
8:12 prior to mauryans there was nanda empire which was unpopular. The administration is derived from there.
Alexander conquest is solely built on remnants of achaemenid rule and turned back due to the vast armies in india.
ANCIENT BOOK OF BUDDHA LALIT-VISTARA WRITE THAT BUDDHA IN HIS CHILDHOOD (AROUND 600 BCE) HAS MASTERED 64 SCRIPTS OF INDIA INCLUDING ANCIENT BRAHMI AND KHAROSTHI.
kharosthi was islamic
@@riddunyra4373 cchuslam was not present at that time .....gochu kehi ka......
@@urrasscal8380 chutiyaism was also not present till 15th century ..gaandu kahi ka ..harami
@@riddunyra4373 gussa kahe ho rahe ho be ... anger is not good for health aise kar tu apna kata hua land pakkad aur hilla le paapistan .......woh bhi tel laga k ......
@@urrasscal8380 get out dog
What about the river saraswati mentioned in the vedas and satellite imagery shows the dry river bed? Ancient civilization dating pre Harappa have been found along the saraswati river.
Not Indus valley civilization, its Saraswati valley civilization
11.54 Wrong information
Generally when we arrived in Europe, India, Egypt... the prior culture dissapears.. However, normally it means acculturation and not genocide. Meaning, in India we would have kept their ancient heritage alive and their bloodlines. Normally, if they were a warring culture we would inter-marry for strength. In those days if they showed pacifity or lack of intelligence they would have been wiped out or enslaved and sold. That culture showed above average intelligence and engenuity as evidenced by the drainage system and they had a religious system already developed that peacefully managed its citizens.. Brahma, which still exist today. Because Brahma, vedas, yogas, etc.. exist today, you know that that culture survived.
Hahahaha, what a dream
Aryans DID NOT identify themselves as "White", "European", "Caucasian" , "Blonde", "Russian" or "Anatolian". For them the word "Aryan" probably meant something like "noble being" and referred to someone who sacrificed (animal sacrifice) to the "right" gods and followed their way of life (which is by the way "pagan" and "demonic" according to Judeo-Christian doctrine).
Given all of this you are NOT in any position to identify your self as an Aryan culturally. (So, the "we" of your comment's "generally when "we" arrived..........." is invalid and it is highly unlikely that someone related to your ancestral blood line arrived in Indus valley anyway).
[ If you really want to "re-identify" yourself as an Aryan, you may wish begin by taking few steps:
1) Worship the right godS.
2) Perform annual and monthly animal sacrifice.
3) Install caste system in your country. (Something like: University profs on top to Janitors in bottom on that rank scale)
4) NO inter-caste marriage. (Zero mixing of genes) ]
@@voicebox2810 ignorant
indus valley is Pakistan, they had toilets and drainage system which india even today dont have
indians defecate on roads
@@tathagatasinha2939Someone has anger issues. 🫤
Brahui came to Western India during medieval times. Many authors highlight the Dravidian speaking Brahui tribe that inhabits the modern region of Balochistan in Pakistan and is close to the Indus valley. One of the arguments is that the Brahuis may represent the remnants of the early Dravidian inhabitants of the Indus valley who were later Aryanized or driven off. But, there are also people who argue that the Brahuis were later medieval migrants to the north from Central India. This is possible because only around 15% of Brahui vocabulary contains Dravidian words and it also does not contain any early Indo-Aryan or early Iranian loan words. So, it means that the Brahuis were not present in the Balochistan region during the early Indo-Aryan Vedic and Old Iranian period. The oldest layer of loan words in Brahui language is from later languages such as Balochi, Sindhi, etc. that evolved during the medieval era. Thus, this could indicate that Brahui migration towards the north would have happened only during medieval times. Also, we have late arrivals of Dravidian languages such as Kurukh in far northern regions like Nepal. Most authors agree that the Kurukh had its original seat in central India and migrated to the north later. Similar would be the case of Brahui migrants.
@@tsmuthuraman9637 You don't even understand the language of Brahui. You are only obsessed with Aryan Migration Theory. I wish you do the same scrutiny when a western/european scum bag puts forward his theory on India. Read this carefully. The oldest layer of loan words in Brahui language is from later languages such as Balochi, Sindhi, etc. that evolved during the medieval era. Thus, this could indicate that Brahui migration towards the north would have happened only during medieval times. Also, we have late arrivals of Dravidian languages such as Kurukh in far northern regions like Nepal. Most authors agree that the Kurukh had its original seat in central India and migrated to the north later. Similar would be the case of Brahui migrants.
@@tsmuthuraman9637 brauhi speaking people are original indigenous thamizh race but now they may be mixed with Aryans and other immigrants.
@@thanu-go1ts Brahui are not Tamil. You shameful people trying to claim everything is yours is so cheap
@@TingTong2568 Just go through the etymology of brahui language😂. It is already proved. Go and brush up ur knowledge. When it is ours we will only claim!! Why do we claim everything? We are claiming everything with proof and we are the ancient civilization of this world. Dont be jealous others are just invaders , got attracted to the rich advanced civilization and started invading us! Still Indian govt(Aryans) are invading thamizh people's treasures 😂😂😂
@@thanu-go1ts etymology? Brahui language only has 15% Dravidian substratum. Not more than that. Plus, having a slight Dravidian essence dosen't mean it's Tamil. Duh.
it is wrong to say that women were not allowed to study veda, and they were not taugh to read.
in contrast the diety of veda and learnig is a goddes "saraswati" there are lots of veda written by women.
12:27 the vedas were an aural tradition before they were written down. #reading
Nonsense!
Thanks man this really helped!!
Wrong map of India depicted....reporting the video....
I personally believe that they originated in India because the supposed Indo-Aryans wrote the Vedas and they always state that their ancestors
were always from India ( for that, check hinduism in google. Not youtube. Most told in youtube is not true.).
excellent presentation. thanks.
How can it be possible that Ramayan and Mahabharat were codified much later than 500 AD or so. The perfect time was around 1100 AD 1200 AD when the monuments in the north were still intact. It's because and only because of Invaders we are deprived of even knowing our own history and are forced to study the glorified history of who destroyed the history. More importantly, we are on the verge of trashing away whatever still remains. Democracy and European secularism have inflicted demographical damage at faster rates than what 1000 years of invaders didn't.
@t s Muthuraman It doesn't seem like that. That era was not about the destruction of one civilization to put another. This is the nature of Abrahamic religions. Read the history of pre-Islamic arab you will get the same. The pagans worshipped many gods and goddesses, much like in India, and plurality was allowed. Modern kaba was the holy sanctuary to many deities. Similarly, the ancient Dravidians had their own deities, as we can see some from Harrapan excavations. Lord Pashupatinath and many other deities. What's likely that later when Aryans came, they brought their own set of deities. It's also possible that the Vedas were in oral traditions for a very long time, and its founder would have been the Dravidians from the Indus valley. Which might have been codified when later. One civilization meeting with another was more likely mingling with another and exchanging goods and ideas in the ancient world. The exchange of goods, knowledge, and ideas was much more common in even the pre-civilized world. The rigid hardcore religion aimed to convert people and replace knowledge, culture, and history is not common in the Indian subcontinent and ancient world. Until much later, when Abrahamic religions arrived, which were political tools rather than philosophical liberal collections of ideas that were constantly intellectually debated is IN India we had.
The major culprit for the destruction of diversity and pluralistic societies are politically mobilizing hardcore belief framework which demands surrender and is considered beyond intellectual discourse.
Something that was never common in ancient pagan polytheistic societies. You don't need to go to history to verify it. The modern-day is a living example of it. How missionaries destroyed indigenous traditions of tribes in Africa and worldwide. The folk traditions/ language/art ideas are suffering across the globe. The native Americans, and Australians have lost most of it. While wherever the Indic dharmic traditions spread, they created a new form mingling with native folk traditions and pre-existing culture. For example, Balinese Hinduism. And forms of Buddhism.
Can i take your video and translate in hindi .. please reply its my request
I think this history is or was written by British professors just read ancient books or come to some gurukul u will get some real knowledge by which knowledge india becomes the super power in ancient times
"Superpower" ? There was no ancient India. India was created by the British.
Well , you should know who discovered indus vally civilization and asoka the great Gurukulas didn’t have clue about such
So be more liberal when its about learning 🙏
@@Soaringsky379 there were hadappa,indus valley, a wel stuctured civilization, weapons tools, lot more things and u said there was no gurukul go read ramayan, mahabharat u will got the gurukul evedance and if u don't believe our books then read chinease traveller's who came thousands of year before like fahiyan and all they will give u the clue of war of Mahabharat...
If your Gurus are of so great knowledge how comes that nobody understands the real meaning of the Veda today?
Even in the Brahmanas the Rics (Mantras) were just taken out of their original context and used for the sacrificial purposes of the Brahmins. Everybody can see this in the Brahmanas. And this obviously means that the Brahmins (unlike the Rishis!) were not able to create own Rics!
@@penoge who said nobady can understand ved ? But to understand ved first u need a strong grip on sanskrit and not the simple today's sanskrit but panini ashtadhyayi vyakaran then read nighantu, shastr etc.. u have to understand a complete chain of books then at last u can translate meaning of vedic mantr ,,,, also u have to be a yogi ( smadhisth) person to gain the meaning of words ,mantra
There's a weird reverb/ layer on the audio vocal this is not pleasant to listen to
Western people should be weary of these people. They will learn from them and later will be outsmarted by them, like what happened in Indua before the foreign steppie people.
@ArmanAditya Basu their legacy does not say so. It is better to consider them as foreign steppie and the culture introduced as foreign. It is right to have this in the preamble set right so that no class is high or low or entitled. This is important, and the country needs it to have a homogeneous identity.
@ArmanAditya Basu legacy and stratification, unhealthy culture. Vedic is foreign but the previous culture just blended in with the natives and created a homogeneous identity only to be destroyed by those who believed in prejudiced minded Gods.
@@armanadityabasu2803firstly there are no aryans or dravidians. First get out of your stupid mindset.
Go fishing dude!😁
@@niningsetia4213You got it as it is not a good thing to bring it up. Rss and hindutva don't like that also. Hush hush! I'm sorry.
Odd that they don't seem to recognize that "raja" is a cognate of the Latin "rex" - I.e. they're basically the same word and both are typically translated as "king". "Maharaja" means "great king" ("maha" is a cognate with the Greek "mega") and the phrase "maharaja di raji" ("great king of kings") was a very common title claimed by the rulers of great empires throughout the Bronze and Iron ages.
Latin if I’m not wrong is a sub root of sanskrit
Long before the Greeks civilized Sanskrit was a flourishing language and the root of most major languages of the world
And who is the they you are alluding to??
@@indranidutta1945 Nonsense. The scientific evidence is clear. Both evolved from slightly different strains of Proto Indo-European (from East and west of the Urals) spoken by related horse-focused nomadic peoples on the Eurasian steppes in the preceding millenium or so.
To claim otherwise makes as little sense as those who claim humans descended from chimps.
@@indranidutta1945 The makers of the video.
There are no references of Indo- Aryans migration from Coceshus mountains to India in Vedic texts.
Love this very much, such a quality information video!
Chinese?
Quality 😂🤣it is western shit on india
Aryans never invaded or come from outside..people of jambudwipa are called arya
Islamic invasion happens not aryan invasion..british created wrong notion
Caste system is not a part of sanatan dharm 🕉 but part of Indian society very sadly 😢
😂😂😂😂👌👌👌
If women were not allowed to study in the Vedic period then who were Lopamudra, Gargi and Maitreyi? Which period were they from? Also the term 'Arya' is Sanskrit means sir, a polite form of addressing each other. In Sanskrit the term 'Arya' does not depict any ethnicity or race. The term "Aryans" was coined by the west, particularly the British. Also FYI the term 'Dravid' is a geographical term depicting the Deccan plateau and not a race, again another ploy by the colonial British to divide the country further.
We must use common sense,have we ever care about history of Africa,china or Europe?!
There are so many verses written in vedas by women and then these people..
fantastic point about women- there were a lot of women scholars in vedic period. This whole episode is half baked and half researched.
You say they had civilization in India in 2600 BC. So what language did they speak in 2600s since they had civilization. Civilization starts with language the people got to have a way to communicate with each other. The crazy thing is a European is telling the story about India, Indian people. And not the from India. Why do the India Indians allow the Europeans to tell their stories and not themselves? Have India Indians ever been conquered by the Europeans?
you must be african descent
@@synthtastic74 Yes! And you?
@@andrelove9634 The Indus valley did have a language of their own
@@ashwinvk4124 And I asked you what language did they speak?
@@andrelove9634 it is still not clear what the language was called many have tried classifying it under different language families especially the Dravidian but however it very hard to know the name of a language which was spoken more than 3000 years ago there is a script though. Archeologists are still trying to understand what could those scripts mean.
And also you said that civilization starts from language that's not true, language starts much before civilization a civilization might add more variations and complexities to the language through literature, poetry etc.
So if a civilization is discovered it is quite obvious that they will have a language people can not build huge cities without a language.
Ashoka turned to buddhism 4 years before the battle of kalinga and mahaveer was the 24 trithankar of jainism, jainism was spread before buddhism.
why you ignore southern part of india kingdoms?
Ellora caves are a thing of beauty
It's Buddhist origin.
@@ronhak3736 yeah Buddhist Origin but In Ellora Caves have Jain God statue , Hindu God statue or Buddha statue 3 Type statue in Ellora Cave
@@ronhak3736 and Buddhism originated from Sanatan Dharma, Gautam Buddha was a Hindu before starting and spreading Buddhism
@@SurajGupta_3D there was no Hindu at the time of Buddha. There are no written or archaeological evidence.
@@ronhak3736and wdym by Buddhist caves? Those are multi-religious caves cansist of 17 hindu, 12 Buddhist and 5 jain caves.
I bet the real primary civilizations were south of here in the Arabian Sea and melted by that big flood.
Can we research what’s under the water?
If you think primitively.
You will begin to understand that, the reason most cultures have worshipped the bull/cow, is because of his virility and her nursing abilities. And both for their strength.
😂😂
@@11_jesusisking yes it's true
In ancient Babylonia, Mesopotamia, Sumerian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Indian, Egyptians, Mayans, Incas, Aztecs used to worship Mother Cow and Bull just because they were easy way to farm and Feed and non dangerous animals 🙏
Have u heard about jallikattu? Where when India tried to ban our authentic sport jallikattu, the protest that we thamizh people did here were one such incident that will never be forgotten. Indus valley has many evidences related to the bull where jallikattu is practiced and same things are found in keezhaddi and adhichanllur excavations in Tamilnadu. It is already proved to be a thamizh civilization. Thamizh civilization had an influence in many countries where korea, chinese, japan etc were influenced by thamizh civilization. And even these foreign countries have accepted their cultural adoption from tamils.
@@thanu-go1ts Tamizh Kings saw themselves as the citizen of Bharat. They spread Sanskrit. Tamil is a great language but if you attack other Indian shades then you are a complete fool.
@@phoenixj1299 nobody is attacking anyone. Im talking the truth. When did tamil kings spread sanskrit? Which kings did? Don't talk about later cholas or pandiyas..some of them are not native tamils,they are telugu mixed breed. They bought sanskrit,inside temples not the native tamil kings.
Classes are based on work how ever GOTRA in based on birth
It is a way to keep track of blood line And AVOID COUSIN MARRIAGE
As it has many health related issues.
Pillars of Eastern civilization: Brahmacharya/celibacy, Non-duality or advaita meaning God is not seperate from the world around, might does not make it right etc
Pillar of Western civilization: Hard work, scientific research, the idea that matter and God are seperate from each other, might makes it right, the idea of human body as a tool of enjoyment and as a cog in a machine for a collective goal etc
Combine both
Are you saying hard work and scientific research are not good? And since when does Hinduism not brag on science in the Mahabharata? And where did you come up with the idea that we believe God and matter are separate? And have you read the Kama Sutra?
@@moorek1967 he never said that. He just stated the characteristics of both civilization. That's all. There are good and bad things in both civilizations.
According to this kingdoms were founded in india around 1500 BC. Nasa found and carbon dated a bridge between India and sri Lanka to be 10000 years old which makes it around 8000 BC time. Who ever made this video get your time line right.
17 thousand as per Nilesh Oak. And Mahabharata is 7k years old as per astronomical evidence.
This history is so misleading, the mention of the South Indian kingdom or Dravidian culture is not mentioned at all. This is so North Indian centric and is very disappointing and misleading.
Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico?
There are lots of evidence proves that Aryans came outside of India. Any they created the Varna system for dominated the indigenous people of India which are looks gray,brown,or black in colour
Exactly the indegenious people of this country are Thamizh civilization,still these aryans are in power in India and they still discriminate us. They very well know everything just making people fool with hindutva idealogies
4 Vedas - Universal Truth
Ones Order in Universe.
Texts are words of the Universe spoken in Vibrations, only when meditated……..
At least in Rwanda they divided ethnicities but targeted philosophies here, they give a pass to other Abrahamics that were focused on conquering and violence at every angle, and we have no support, nor do we speak up as much as AA in the USA for example, btw I was born in a Sikh family and consider myself Dharmic that were focused on inner peace, this respect Abrahamics don’t understand.
The word “casta” is in Portuguese and English, and actually widened the outside or untouchabIe gaps, we were their biggest target during the Indian Ocean slave trade and inquisition.
Spirituals and tribaIs are targets to brainwash. Our greatest strength and weakness was believing all gods are gurus, so far they’ve only manipulated. We need to shed the habits and labels as much as possible also.
The system was a part of Manusmriti not Gita or reIigious, CH18 passages 40-45, which also simply points to the brain/chest/arms/legs to reach enlightenment and based on karma or deeds, nirvana is the ultimate goal in human life that also breaks the reincarnation cycle, similar to the chakra system and meditation. It’s a compass or a family that completes itself and equal. From the oldest civilizations, it remained the steadiest due to dharma. It experienced every invasion and was probably the only genealogy for a billion people. People started adding surnames…etc afterwards that didn’t exist during ancient times, for example I was born Sikh and last names are important in the community.
The Mughals were the first to manipulate it to identify “paak” or pure, did colorism, forced my Chamar community to sweep when they refused to convert and today the stigma continues. Today they have a country that attacked others as they were leaving during the 47 partition.
The CathoIic system and missionaries called them pagan, they can’t hide evidence of ancient civilizations, they believe Adam and Eve were first, they believe they were created for them to see the light or change, basically pagans are property, like how another Abrahamic calls others reverts when it was the youngest, pure narcissism. Brain wash occurs by painting own bad first, how these mission groups work. The current system is more similar to theirs, each church was its own system, starting with the pope on top, priests, bishops and nuns at bottom. This is the oldest and largest denomination.
During the colonial period it was primarily industrialization based, but the British royal hierarchy was a representation and in power, it was enforced in society with the Criminal Tribes Act of 1871 that labeled certain communities as criminals. Herbert Hope Risley measured nasal bridges to racially divide classes and created the Aryan versus Dravidian theory. Arthur de Gobineau claimed British soldiers were above and manipulated priests for control.
It was a way for them to plagiarize ancient civilizations, because Dharma was the oldest, HitIer claimed Nordics came down and built them, when the migration was upwards. They normally give preference to biblical regions or Egypt where Moses was born in general.
Till this day we use their definitions and tiers of “lndo-Aryan” languages, which they claim means European, when Sanskrit and TamiI were both the oldest recorded. Now a lot of insecure neighbors play with it as well.
We should protect native paganism and be proud it’s among the oldest recorded regardless, it remained the steadiest due to dharma. Dharma philosophies believe in all paths lead to same destination and all gods are gurus, didn’t try to change others or spread but inner peace, quaIity not quantity, but know basic survival. Why the nation is a democracy, colorful and always in celebration. It evolved with Mother Earth and respected goddesses, animals and nature. It is science based, for example the 10 avatars of Vishnu resembIe the Darwin theory of evolution. Can also be an Atheist or astika/nastika. Also varna is based on birth, others go by moksha or reincarnation and scripts says karma or deeds.
SMH yt trying to sneak a hour and a half commercial 😮
Varna does not mean only color. It means types or varieties.
Caste system was always present in India. It was not imposed by a tiny population of Brahmins and kshatriyas. It was codified by Brahmins through Manusmriti.
Again manusmriti....damn. Do you guys even talk about other dharmashastras?
@@ghs89 What are other dharmasastras? Would you list some of them here for us to check together?
Varnas are based on karma means deuty job ,,
If your good person your Bramhan
If your a thief killer your a shudra
And manusmriti are not reIigious.
Since Manusmriti was written by Brahmins so they self define them as highest rank and defined others as lowest rank.
In our ancient tamil we don't have Varna based on the any Dharma Shastra. It is only based on the work they do they defined based on the lands which they live like Kurinji, Mullai, Marutham, Neithal and Paalai.
The idea that Buddhism was for lower class people and Hinduism was for upper caste is absolute bullshit. In fact much of the "33 million gods" are because of individual deities of families . Hinduism does not have 33 million gods as terms of institution. On the other hand Buddhism was quite elite. It required initiation and going in an monastery . Thats why you have buddhist monasteries where as Hinduism did not have any. Also, Buddhism being for egalitarian is also crap as much of the immediate Buddhist followers themselves reveled in being upper caste and that Buddha himself was of upper caste. Buddhism was never meant to cut across cast. What is was was the rejection of ritualistic aspects of the Vedas . This is not to create a rift between the two categories of philosophies but this information is totally misleading
why lie. india was black and all the teachings came from the black civilazations
😂
Are you restarted
Even Ashoka the great Couldn't able to conquer the South INDIA . Because there lived dravidans , Dravidans are more superior than these . Please make a Video about dravidans
So, there it is. More steppe peoples, and this time those originally from yuezhi, pushed peoples southward, the Kushans, who were themselves living in Bacteria, into what is northern India today. More foreign blood, therefore, from more central Asian regions came into India and mixed with the people already living there. Indians if today have genes from all these peoples from as long ago as the Harrapans to the Greeks to the Persians (multiple times) to these Turko-Mongols. Not easy to figure it all out, but the history reveals light on the subject.
Vedic scriptures has no foreign memory at all, except land of SAPTSINDHU( Current Punjab. Haryana , etc.). Kushan etc adopted indian culture and propagated it.
Con verted piece of 🗑️ spotted 🤡
@@melg6834, what do these words mean? They look nice with the little icons in the sentence. It reminds me of children's books called rebus.
@ArmanAditya Basu Aryan is fake propagnda.
@ArmanAditya Basu tu to pehle jaa k machli kha.....
When you fail in your research and could not map Ancient India Map
Very interesting. I write in the field of religious studies and find both the comment of Prof. Bennet and replies consistent with my learning both academic and in practice. Thank you very much for this video.☘️
religion is a cancer on humanity
Don't read its bs western historiran are doing shit never read them.
the video is full of non sense, dont believe it. There is nothing like 5th varna. There are only 4 varnas. That is basically classification of work force. It based on the skills not on birth. later on it became Birth based. Caste Discrimination had been there. Would like to provide information along with Proofs if you want to learn.
Sure. I want to learn. Yes.
@@staciwashington3212 OK what you want to learn about India?
West compares religion born in Indian subcontinent with their Abrahamic religion. When will they understand that religion here(can be seen as different path to moksha or nirvana) have a deeper meaning and purpose it's nothing like christianity or islam
Correct your map !
POK is integral part of India
The varna description is not right
There was nothing called below this
Below that
This is western description
This is just bullshit. The Europeans brought the Aryan invasion theory for their vested interests. It's not supported by archaeology or genetics. Now you're just repeating it. Varna in this context doesn't mean colour. Varna means what's opted and accepted based on the inherent qualities. In Sanskrit, words have different meanings. And the Varnasrama system consists of only 4. Brahmana, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shudra. Whoever not included in the first three fall under the fourth. This was an unnecessary video.
British to be more precise.
#bramhingoback
@@y1.5 ,kisi din apne baap ko bhi ghar se mat bhaga dena.. character to bilkul waisa hi hai..
It isn't. Please read the article from London Swaminathan. He's more educated than you.
@@xr55 How do you know about my education?
Brahma & Sri Saraswati sounds like Abraham & Sara. They are so similar that there has to be a common origin. I think East to West.
Abraham and sarah was a vedic text.
Abrahm = brahm - A
May be Abrahm is anti brahm
@@hannahpocock4152 but they are used for Indians
According to me history of the world
Is
That all civilization use to do idol worship
Fire rituals
But l think civilization still exists in India
Bcs other countries have lost there culture
@@-__________abhinavtariyal_5999 God is Dog backwards. May be God is a Cat. But Leo is Anubis so is God a Catdog a Fox.
@@anvilbrunner.2013 in english it is god or dog
In our language it is not used ,in english it can be😂
It became a dessert. And warring for lands bc of climate change is a harsh force.
Bhagavad Gita 4-13, lord Krishna says that he created different varnas on the basis of one's Karma (activity) and Guna (quality) not by birth but some powerful people during ancient times misused their powers and created a caste system by birth.🕉️🙏🙏
Where did Lord Shiva first appear ,the Adiyogi?The harapan civilisation did engage in yoga,but questions still remain(to be continued..)
Arayan invasion myth 😂lol western ideology. Good presentation. We r the Indigenous people's.
I a Aryan Sinhalese Buddhist from Sri Lanka Colombo I love Indian History
Where Sri Lanka Maha Baratha mutual connections had for many thousand years and Aryans arrived with Prince Vijaya and With Emperor Asoka sent his son and daughter to Sri Lanka to promote Buddhism in Sri Lanka 2500 ago
Sri Lanka was ruled by Sinhalese Buddhist great Kings for over 2500years till British captured entire Lanka in 1815
gained independence in 1948
Shitalese 😂
You need more research on this subcontinent history. Better discuss with locals north & south. Don't mix religions in it. Look at the kings & queens and their language, tradition and power.
Bramins invaded Tamils, the NATIVES of India! STILL ruling them!
Nonsense! The Tamils came with Manu Vaivasvata to India who was king of the Dravidians in Tretayuga before he came by ship to India in the great flood which ended the Tretayuga and the Chakshusha Manvantara and became Manu in Dvaparayuga.
excellent
ARYANS are indians
@t s Muthuraman American whites is a history. ARYAN INVASION is a theory...
@t s Muthuraman invasion theory was given by people who invaded other's country.
@t s Muthuraman it's been proved that European countries have Aryan genes. Aryans went outside ARYAVART (ancient India).
@t s Muthuraman Sanskrit is the mother of all Languages.
@@soumyaranjanbehera3770 No. Hittite is older than Sanskrit.
Trying to connect some geological events to scripture to make it authentic even though there is no connection between the written text and history. It is like saying the thermonuclear weapons today had history with puranic wars.
Aryan's spoiled Indian way of life