Kyle rittenhouse wouldn’t have even been there if he didn’t have a gun but I noticed guns give people a fucked up since of empowerment and control. You tell that boy ain’t never been in a fist fight
Piers asking if hes comfortable with making money off of people dying is crazy....basically all of piers money is made off of the news of people dying and capitalizing on it
@@UrbFoxFactYeah, imagine trying to make any kind of money to feed yourself when you have institution And activists trying to drain you of your money through the legal system and hoping that you end up starved on the streets. To think that if no one had chased Kyle that day that those 2 child molesters would not have died.
@@UrbFoxFact "Journalism" is corporate media presenting a NARRATIVE for a profit. Telling a story from a first person perspective is more valuable to society and if you can earn a paycheck....
@@MichaelMattison England & Wales combined has 50,500 stabbings per year, compared to 20,958 non-suicide deaths by guns per year in the US. Most people survive being stabbed, with only 282 deaths, but those attackers go on to attack more people in the future.
@@Delosian No there are not 50,500 stabbings per year, that number is for offences involving a sharp object, the majority of which (20,000) are for carrying a knife or sharp object. There were 3775 hospital visits due to knife/sharp objects. 261 of said offences were homicides.
Pierce is ridiculous, asking the kid if he has regret on a human point of view. And then host Israeli commanders who have killed 15000 people, no questions of being a human or regrets.
Piers is not a regular youtuber influencer or reaction channel interviewing his freinds. This is not that kind of channel. Piers is a news journalist, on a time limit for each interview.
Piers: "Why aren't you crying for the violent thugs who attempted to kill you?" I feel so sorry for this kid. Imagine having to kill two people in obvious self-defence only to be treated like the villain, disgusting.
Perhaps he shouldn't have been there - as a 17-year-he arguably (and based on the incident) wasn't able to deal with as a mature adult would have been.
@@sparksforbrightsparks1371Perhaps the looters in rioters shouldn't have been there either. You sound like the type of person who if you were in the same situation would have just laid down and died.
Pierce asking whether Kyle feels comfortable with making money about what is a tragic story that cost the lives of many people. Literally what Pierce does every day sinds October 8.
He could have said that he feels terrible for taking 2 life's, no matter if it was his fault or not. His only focus is framing that he "had" to do it otherwise he wouldn't have been here, which is another bullshit. He's been well media trained and the sociopathic characteristics are obvious. It's like speaking to a robot.
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried, The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
Piers: asks a question Interviewer: answers Piers: doesnt like the answer. "You're not answering my question" Ok Piers, its a good thing we can see and hear for ourselves.
@@stephenj.schneider5185He lived with his mom in Antioch, IL, 800 yards from the state border, and 17 miles from Kenosha, WI, where he worked as a lifeguard and his dad lived. It’s not unreasonable for him to be in Kenosha.
Oh piers stop digging for emotional responses. He said what he means... he's suffering for the decision he made but he's fully aware that if he hadn't done it, it would have been him. He has no obligation to feel any kind of guilt or remorse.
Piers doesn't seem to understand that the guy was gonna die if he didn't defend himself. Piers always let's his own emotions get in the way of his interviews. Mention, Megan Markle, Winston Churchill or Guns and he interrupts the topic to talk about them. He would be so easy to manipulate in an interview.
Why would he not feel guilt? He took 2 lives from their families. He did have the right to defend himself. Was his life at risk? Probably not, but he didn’t know that at the time. Piers asked all the right questions and gave him an opportunity to explain himself.
@@woooooooo9061 he's asking the guy if people his age at the time should be allowed guns. If this guy didn't have a gun at the time he'd be dead now. U think that's a quality interview?? The original OP is right Piers is trying to get emotional responses so he can say "even people who kill in self defence regret having a gun". Piers needs to keep his nose out of the U.S constitution before he embarrasses himself again. Ben Shapiro was right, Piers stands on the graves of gun victims but his argument has no substance.
Old Piers Morgan please, you're trying to dig up emotional response from the kid you just keep asking the same question over and over. The kid defended himself end of story.
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried, The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
Never underestimate the power of Stupid people in large groups. It is foolish to chase down a retreating person with a lethal weapon, akin to a pack of Hyenas chasing a Lion who will eventually be forced to defend himself when cornered against a mob of people intent on hurting him.
The mob was terrifying to watch. I can only assume Piers didn't bother to watch that scene unfold and put himself in Kyle's shoes. Kyle was jumped by violent skateboard guy, kicked by a random, and then had a gun pointed at him by an Antifa "medic". He was retreating and going to the police. You can see him trying to turn himself in! People need to watch the source video before they have opinions about what Kyle should have done. Can't trust the media to provide fair coverage.
@gitoffmahlawn , Yes Peirs can be very pigheaded &one eyed at times .Working as a bouncer many years ago I have seen how the mob mentality of low iq pack (human) animals can behave and it is not very pleasant, terrifying to say the least .
That idiot kid should’ve never been there in the first place. How about the other angle of trying to put down a threat? He looked threatening the way he was dressed and walking around with a rifle. He Looked like every single school shooter I’ve ever seen
I respect Piers Morgan & enjoy listening to his commentary BUT I did not enjoy this. Kyle Rittenhouse is alive due to thugs attacking him & he shot them, then they died. He does not need anyone, especially Piers, to dig his emotional wound back open for media points. I guess Piers would not protect himself from thugs trying to kill him? Kyle was focused & well spoken. I hope his book is a best seller.
I agree that this is a pretty clear-cut case of self-defense, but if Rittenhouse doesn't want his emotional wounds dug back open, why is he going on interviews on huge platforms? Why is he parading himself everywhere? Don't you think it would be better for someone suffering from PTSD over killing others to keep a low profile instead of doing everything they can to remain in the spotlight?
I’m actually shocked Piers posted this clip. What an absolute disgrace he was treating someone who HAD to either defend himself or die (and probably worse before he died considered the rap sheet of one of his attackers) like this. Kyle was put in an impossible, terrifying situation and had the discipline to ONLY pull the trigger on people who posed a literal deadly and imminent threat. There are trained and seasoned soldiers who don’t have this type of accuracy and discipline.
Oh shut up we both know Kyle did what he did when he was 17 because he wanted to get famous. Enough with the whole “he had to defend himself bless his cotton socks😢”. He’s now going to profit off his book that he claims is “only to tell his story”. I’m right leaning and I’m not even this much of a dumbass to believe every kid that ugly twat is saying 😂
So your telling me piers if you had a gun and about 3 to 4 people where rushing you with guns or trying to tackle you after you verbally warn them multiple times you wouldn’t fire warning shots? Or take them out if your life was in danger?
I was surprised that federal prosecutors were so lenient on Dominick Black, the 18-year-old who bought Kyle Rittenhouse the AR-15. He could have been sentenced to up to 25 years in federal prison. Instead, he got a slap on the wrist for a crime that "most adults" would have served hard time for committing. Dominick Black was shown an unreal amount of mercy.
@@Scorch1028 Did you watch the trial.....this issue was covered and your analysis differs from the lawyers. Buying the gun was legal...leaving it out of the safe thus allowing a minor access was the issue. Dominick Blacks father held the keys to the safe which he had opened the night before and failed to secure before leaving for work the following morning.
Piers is one of those people who is absolutely certain he knows how to reduce crime until it happens to him. Obviously everyone that's disarmed will not get attacked by anyone so it's really the armed person's fault. And now he's a cold blooded killer despite maybe having defended himself in a very responsible way. He held off on shooting until there was a skateboard flying towards his head. Thanks for putting your stupidity on full display Piers.
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried, the man above will send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
I’m from Bangladesh🇧🇩. And I know a thing or two about tyranny and authoritarianism. Without the second amendment, you can’t possibly have any rights at all. Boy! I’m envious of Americans freedom to bear arms.🇺🇸🫡
@@maplemutt158 Apparently it was illegal for a person his age to carry such a weapon in public. Also, you don't think he was looking for trouble at all? That's a bit like me taking a baseball bat to a football match
@@keifer7813 Perhaps he was looking for trouble. He has not said that was his motive and I can't read his mind, so I don't actually know whether he went there to help as he said or whether he was looking for trouble. Perhaps a bit of both?
@@keifer7813 Btw, he specifically said it was legal (not illegal) for him, at his age, to carry the rifle he carried that day/night. If it had been illegal, I'm confident he would have lost his court cases.
You haven’t been in a threatening position! Careful! The UK is changing and not for the better. It won’t be too long that we in the Uk might need to carry some form of protection, look at Aberfan and Ireland recently, Aberfan 9am stabbing of pregnant woman taking her child to school, kids getting stabbed in Ireland outside school. Seriously things are a lot worse in the the UK and not all of it gets to the main news
In the UK their are very harsh sentences for vigilantes. The last thing the police want is people with no training coming in, and ruining their attempts at deescalating the situation.
i dont think piers is wrong often, but i actual felt disgusted that he was asking him, ' how does it feel' cmon piers... your better than that. from what i saw and have researched about this situation.. this guy had every right and i would have done the same, what is piers saying you should just let yourself be killed because you shouldnt defend yourself
who drove 20 miles - with a gun - got involved in something which was nothing to do with him ( you think the police welcome vigilantes???) - and killed people - there you go - much easier when you look at the reality
Piers, your framing of him and the interview itself has been a disgrace.. You are obviously ignorant of a huge part of the whole story, and your bias is showing.
@@squidguard1 he drove a short distance from his home to a place that he went to all the time anyway because his friends and one of his parents lived there, and it just so happened that the state line ran through that short distance from home - like dozens of places in the USA do. People literally cross state lines every single day for work or school and nobody ever makes a thing about it - until a white kid had to defend himself for doing it in the woke era. The people he defended himself against were violent thugs happy to attack what was obviously a kid, and one of them also happened to be a convicted child rapist, so if anything, KR deserves a medal. Who knows what these creeps would have done to him or others if he hadnt acted
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried, The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
@@sxnses Dude, Jeff Rosenbaum "was charged by a grand jury with 11 counts of child molestation and inappropriate sexual activity around children, including anal rape. The victims were five boys ranging in age from nine to 11 years old." He got what he deserved.
Rittenhouse epitomises many of the positive attributes of the American ethos, such as, “Don’t tread on me.” His actions were lawful, and justifiable morally.
This guy has more balls than 99% of people. I know what happened to you changed your life but you did exactly what you needed to do. Those out of control criminals would have taken his life and our Democratic government would have applauded that. Piers you are off on your back handed attack of this hero.
And the criminals who attacked him were not there looking for trouble or to commit a crime? You sound like a true Democrat protecting the criminal over the hero.
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried, The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
That's pure nonsense. Kyle Rittenhouse went to those protests looking for trouble. He NEVER served in a law enforcement capacity so his bs that he was there to protect property is nonsense. He got exactly what he was looking for. Unfortunately it's cost people their lives.
Kyle Rittenhouse is a fraud. He went to those protests looking for trouble because if he wasn't why go there with a weapon? This bs he's peddling that he went there to protect property is nonsense. It's law enforcements job to do that, not some punk kid who wasn't legally old enough to purchase the weapon on his own. He got a friend that was old enough to purchase the weapon for him. It's unfortunate that people had to die because of the actions of a coward.
My heart goes out to Kyle, he had grown adults pull firearms on him and HE’S being treated as the criminal. Piers what is a kid supposed to do when lawless adults enact violence against them? I would’ve LOVED to be on the other end of the interview and share some solid facts with Piers.
Wtf are u talking about? Did i hear right, that he took a firearm and went to this demonstration himself?? If thats what he did- he was looking for trouble. And he is the most stupid person on this earth. And he does deserve to be in jail. 16-17 years old and has shot two people!!? Only in fucking america!! Your gun laws are a fucking joke. Any lunatic can go around with a gun. But hey, america profits from it, so who the fuck cares if their population is safe on the streets or the children are safe in school. joke of a goverment!
I have enjoyed & respected many Piers interviews lately. This was not one of them. Piers asked many unfair, biased questions and expressed zero care for all he’s been through. Kyle is a young man who was forced to defend himself in a horrific situation, and he did so in a lawful way. Shame on Piers for the way he treated him here; his mind was made up already.
@@gitoffmahlawn Yes! Deeply incurious is the *perfect* way to describe his approach to this interview! I can only speculate here, but Piers seemed to want to provoke Kyle, as if to show his character is that of a villain. However, in contrast to that, the way Kyle conducts himself in response to Piers’s unfair treatment of him shows that he is a young man with integrity, honesty, humility, & maturity beyond his years, who knows what his life is worth and cannot be distracted from his life’s purpose. At the VERY least, you think Piers would have at least had the common decency to acknowledge that it is a blessing Kyle is alive and wasn’t killed by the young men who pointed the guns at him.
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried, The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
@@sxnses You keep telling everyone that the “man above” will judge him. 1.) Your spiritual blindness illustrates you don’t believe in God 2.) God will judge you & me and every single person for every sin, every hateful word, every lustful thought, every “white lie”, every single minor offense. Hope you realize that. Pray more.
Kyle is a great example of how the media lies and persicutes gun owners. Well done on this interview Kyle way to stay respectful and get your message out.
I feel bad for this kid, he could’ve lost his life for protecting a small business that has nothing to do with what’s going in the world, this kid protected himself legally and to be honest I would have done the same thing
this kid drove 20 miles and had no business being there - he wasn't defending a small business!! He was acting like rambo - and two people paid with their lives for his immature fantasy.
Piers Morgan what would YOU have done if you were in his situation? Are you going to say that you wouldn’t have defended yourself? Word for word, what would YOU have done if your situations were reversed?
Correct! Furthermore, I'm thinking Piers has in some or all situations his personal security and they are armed and they are authorized to defeat the threat in whatever means they deem necessary.
@@BallJuiceOfZeus If the good guys don't have guns then only the bad guys will. Look at south america, africa, the middle east. Want an oppressed population more often? Dont give them means to protect themselves.
Piers gave him a hard time over nothing. The kid doesn’t write the laws, he merely follows them. As a UK citizen like Piers, I can’t really fathom the gun culture, it doesn’t exist here. However because we can’t fathom it, we can’t just use that bias to slate someone who’s morally, and legally done nothing wrong.
Piers! Piers! Piers! I just can’t watch you anymore. This interview is the pits. You interrogated this young man and he still has to defend himself. I think you have become a bully!
Well, I actually think piers voice and tone sounded more sympathetic and he seemed more behaved this usual. Yes his questions were silly. But they accurately represent to convoluted view of most liberals who are against own protection.
@@skeelatheskink8724 That would make it at best concern trolling. Every question in that interview was aimed at making Kyle out to be the villain in his own self-defence story.
Piers Morgan....ever the objective and open-minded journalist. It makes you wonder if he's ever been in a situation where he feared losing his life at the hands of someone with ill intent. He comes off as someone who cannot fathom needing to defend your life or someone that would readily hand his life over if it was a choice between his and an attackers.
You’re right. He went there because he was scared. Guy recounts his story thousands of times since the event and thousands of times people still read into their own convenient narrative. These same people who shouldn’t go out driving because the fact that they are wearing a seat belt means they are scared they might get into a car crash. 🙄
@TimHoefer A 17 year old brought a semiautomatic rifle to a protest he didn't have to be at because he wanted a reason to use his new toy his momma got him. If they attacked him in his home, then I'd defend him, but he chose to go there with the intent to shoot.
@@dapper.degenerate5701 If the Democratic authorities had done their jobs instead of scoring political points to embarrass Trump and swing the 2020 election ordinary civilians wouldn't feel the need to arm themselves and protect the public. Blame the Democrats, not Kyle.
He held up quite well. The guy had an absolute right to defend himself & was found to have done so legally. I hope he makes a ton of money from his book.
He went somewhere and had a weapon and killed two people. My black friend had someone come to his house with a gun and he defended himself but he is prison. Self defense or stand your ground rarely applies to black people.
@@Tony38533 "Jacob Blake had a knife and the very sight of that knife is what the police called a serious threat and a reasonable belief to use lethal force. So an officer shot Blake in the back 4 times and in the side 3 times. The cops did that over the threatening sight of a knife." Oh calm TF down, Nancy. They didn't shoot him 7 times over "the sight of" the knife, or else they would have ventilated his azz long before he made it to the car door. They shot him because, as he tried getting into HIS GF'S car WITH THEIR 3 KIDS SITTING IN THE BACK SEAT, Ofc Sheskey grabbed his shirt in a final effort to prevent his escape, car theft, and kidnapping. And when Shesky grabbed his shirt, Black swung the knife in his right hand at Sheskey, so Sheskey FINALLY lit him up. He showed remarkable restraint until then.
I've given this a bit of thought and I'm wondering if this simply didn't go as Piers had planned. Perhaps he had it in his mind that he was going to "rehabilitate" his image with some of the haters by drawing out statements of regret and remorse. But I think what Piers didn't take into account is that this young man lived through this horrific night and has continued to live with it every day for over 3 years. But for him to have regrets for the outcome of that night would be for him to regret choosing to live. Asking him to have empathy for the vile people who would have killed him is absurd. They showed no empathy for him or concern over killing him.
Empathy is what separates us form most animals. Obviously Kyle has none, I mean I have seen relatives of victims forgive murderers. Kyle is so unaware of his role in this whole case, that he looks and sounds like a psychopath, only concerned with his owned with his trauma, his life and the the money he will make with his book.
Piers: “Do you regret that you killed two young men?” Kyle: “Piers, I was defending my life.” Piers: “And do you ever regret that you survived?” Kyle: “Uhmm, no, Piers.” Piers: “But how does that make you FEEL?” Kyle: “What does this have to do with feelings?” Piers: “How does it feel to be leader of the nazi regime and KKK all at such a young age?” Kyle: “……..” Piers: “Thank you Kyle Racist… I mean Rittenhouse… for joining me today.” 😂😂😂 Hyperbole, of course, but not far off…
It's very interesting to me that Piers doesn't seem to understand that a radicalized man had a pistol pointed at this boy's face, had another man attempting to beat his face in with a 7-ply maple piece of wood with two metal trucks, and had more men attempting to remove his firearm from him at the time. It was all recorded thankfully for this kid. What would Piers have done if he found himself in the same situation?
The Founders said nothing about "being a part of a well-regulated militia". They said one was necessary to the security of a free state. This gives a reason for, not the only reason for and not a limitation on, the right of the people (not the militia...the PEOPLE) to keep and bear arms.
Why is it that when it comes to controversial topics such as firearms the media decides to go off assumptions and emotions instead of doing research? Piers didn’t look good when he had to be corrected and it’s not the first time that he has been corrected in interviews. What I do appreciate about Piers is that he doesn’t get aggressive and fight back with the guest like others do.
To be fair to Piers (dear God, what am I saying?!?), this is largely a matter of semantics. It was against the law locally for Kyle to purchase or own the firearm (hence why his friend bought it, and his friend's father stored it, with the intention that ownership would be transferred upon Kyle reaching the necessary age to do so). There was, however, a carve-out in the law that permits older minors to carry rifles or shotguns with a barrel length of 16" or longer. I would guess that the spirit of that law was to allow such minors to get into hunting at an earlier age, but the letter of the law wasn't specifically written to limit such permission to carry to only be for the purposes of hunting. In other words, they were both right. Piers was right that Kyle couldn't legally have (own) the rifle, while Kyle was right that he COULD legally have (carry) it.
@@kevreeduk222If I may, the spirit of the law was specifically written so that handguns that were used in street violence were restricted from minors but that minors were allowed to carry ordinary rifles. They didn't make the exception to older minors carrying firearms from a broad restriction on firearm carrying (itself a 2A violation but not arguing that point now), but rather the exception was to narrow the scope of the original statue under which Kyle was charged and ultimately dropped because ADA Binger and Kraus can't actually read very well (They were really poor at their task, or good depending how you see it). I'm just very disappointed Piers can't understand how a comma works, bringing up 2A in that manner. He needs to return to 8th grade and learn grammar rules and I wish I was joking.
@@dylanwarwick4429 Thanks for the clarification. In fairness, my assumptions were based on conversations within several of the livestreams around the time of the trial, rather than on the basis of any personal legal research. Yup, Binger and Krauss were... how do I put this diplomatically... entertaining? As for Piers, I don't think it's a misunderstanding of grammar, but more an exercise in deliberate misinterpretation. He made reference to having learned his lesson and no longer wading into the 2A debate, then basically ridiculed 2A!Disingenuous doesn't do it justice!
Piers, I was starting to respect you as a journalist. Now I see you are still the same, biased and talking down to those who you feel are beneath you. Shame on you. Do better.
While I agree with his right to self defense I actually don't agree. Came across way too robotic and hesitant in my mind... if 2A is going to have an advocate let it be someone who can get way more ideas across in short order.
I watched a lot of the trial from NZ. He was innocent. He was attacked by some thugs, one of which was a convicted sex offender. Piers was gentle and fair.
....one was a convicted sex offender......you found it " the smoking gun" ( pun intended) that there proves Kyle was not only defending himself, but, you know, this guy had it coming.
Piers was trying to get Kyle to say how symptomatic he may feel towards the victims family and friends. Appropriate? He handles himself very well considering his age and circumstances.
His answers were scripted maybe not to the tee but he has an outline cause he was informed by his lawyers that other prosecutors would love to make a political statement by trying to get him arrested for something else.
He is on a press tour and when you get asked the same questions 10 times in a day or 2 why would you say the answer differently? Go home kiddy/gun grabbers
He would have had to murder someone to have needed to do that. And no the 2nd person was not anywhere near the scene of the first shooting. You really should look into getting better sources of information, unless of course you're just lieing@@Jayess-c
What a load of stupid questions,.. Everyone trying to get either guilt or regret... Do you think it's right to be able to carry the gun that saved his life.... Naaah should only be able to carry a water pistol.
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried, The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
Piers, would you ask WWII vets these same questions, or would you feel bad about the situation they were put in? In America, we have the right to bear arms, and I think this kid had a better head on his shoulders than most adults do. He did not shoot everyone attacking him. Only people whom he found to be threatening to his life, all during a chaotic situation. People screaming and yelling, helicopters overhead, gunfire going off around him, on top of, being physically assaulted and verbally being told he was going to be killed. If only more adults acted with his level-headedness during this type of situation. ONE MORE THING: People have a right to protect their property, loved ones, and businesses against a group of irrational people; defending a woman beater who disobeyed police commands after his abused wife called them; on him!
Should he have been there that night? No Should he have brought his gun at that age? No Did he make the right decision to protect himself and would we have all done the same in his situation? Absolutely
It's the 1st 2 questions that people seem to not understand. Dude was a minor at the time. The property he was "patrolling" wasn't his residence. It's near impossible to get your 17yo in the US military without goin through waivers. And somehow, we are supposed to ignore all that. 🤦🏾♂️
Once again, Piers is embarrassing himself. Kyle Rittenhouse did NOT do anything wrong. If the 2 punks that had did what they did left Rittenhouse alone, none of this would have happened.
@@jron5113 No, those were loaded questions designed to make viewers hate Kyle. Called him a murderer despite the fact Kyle was the victim defending himself from multiple violent attackers- as confirmed by the court ruling. This whole interview was an attempted character assassination; Piers is an absolute slimeball.
@@Tony38533 He took the weapon to protect himself lol. You don't get to play this card, mate, when we've literally seen him expertly use that weapon to save his life.
his responses were so scripted which is understandable considering his age. I would hope he gets interviewed in 10-15 years time when hes had time to truly reflect on what happened
He has reflected and writing a book i will purchase. He is a class case of self-defense. And he offed two p*do's who shouldn't have been out of prison. Check the video.
@@dellingson4833 watched the video and I'm not accusing him of anything or saying he was wrong or bad. I just don't think this interview was natural and I would like to know how he would feel years down the line because how we perceive past events has we age change.
@@Lozza97 never said he was lying. Just saying he's responses seemed rehearsed or he has talking points he has to stick to. I never said he was wrong, never said he was guilty. I just wanted a more natural interview.
The young man had every right to defend himself. I agree it is not an appropriate question to ask him if he feels bad about having had to defend himself against violence. Do better Pierce. He has the right to share his story. It may very well be therapeutic for him.
Kyle didn't have to be there at all. He chose to go somewhere with a gun and make himself a target. Don't cry about consequences you put yourself in. Kyle went there with the intent to use his gun.
Why do I have a feeling that Piers is not exactly thrilled that Kyle was acquitted...
Seriously? How much more obvious can it get? Piers is a total coward he says anything his bosses tell him to
Kyle rittenhouse wouldn’t have even been there if he didn’t have a gun but I noticed guns give people a fucked up since of empowerment and control. You tell that boy ain’t never been in a fist fight
@@kingabstract2288Anyone who can carry a gun but refuses to is a fool.
@@samizdat113take out "who can" and then I will agree
@@MoosePete That sentence would be a grammatical nightmare.
Piers asking if hes comfortable with making money off of people dying is crazy....basically all of piers money is made off of the news of people dying and capitalizing on it
Still a valid question.
@@colinwithrow1083If you think this young man deserves to be in prison.
i'm not a fan of morgan but this is a poor comparison since journalism is a necessary component of our culture whereas writing a book for cash isn't.
@@UrbFoxFactYeah, imagine trying to make any kind of money to feed yourself when you have institution And activists trying to drain you of your money through the legal system and hoping that you end up starved on the streets.
To think that if no one had chased Kyle that day that those 2 child molesters would not have died.
@@UrbFoxFact "Journalism" is corporate media presenting a NARRATIVE for a profit. Telling a story from a first person perspective is more valuable to society and if you can earn a paycheck....
Piers is the embodiment of why the US needed to be independent in the first place.
Great Britain has a rough , unarmed, road ahead. Progressives , sheesh!
@@MichaelMattison England & Wales combined has 50,500 stabbings per year, compared to 20,958 non-suicide deaths by guns per year in the US. Most people survive being stabbed, with only 282 deaths, but those attackers go on to attack more people in the future.
uk is nowhere near as woke as the us
us is the inventor of wokism@IgnoreNot-qg3ly
piers have to bow down to yuuish money
@@Delosian No there are not 50,500 stabbings per year, that number is for offences involving a
sharp object, the majority of which (20,000) are for carrying a knife or sharp object. There were 3775 hospital visits due to knife/sharp objects. 261 of said offences were homicides.
Before i start watching, i predict Piers Morgan has a moral quandary. Lets see if im wrong for a change
😂😂
LOL !
right again
haha, good one!
Underrated comment
Pierce is ridiculous, asking the kid if he has regret on a human point of view. And then host Israeli commanders who have killed 15000 people, no questions of being a human or regrets.
😂 spot on
I don't count Hamas as people killed.
@@lf9341 Not all Hamas tho are they? How many Hamas? How many civilians? big difference.
Piers is not a regular youtuber influencer or reaction channel interviewing his freinds. This is not that kind of channel. Piers is a news journalist, on a time limit for each interview.
Which kid?
Piers: "Why aren't you crying for the violent thugs who attempted to kill you?"
I feel so sorry for this kid. Imagine having to kill two people in obvious self-defence only to be treated like the villain, disgusting.
Kyle was commenting on a felony at the time with his straw purchased weapon. He's the criminal thug.
Perhaps he shouldn't have been there - as a 17-year-he arguably (and based on the incident) wasn't able to deal with as a mature adult would have been.
@@sparksforbrightsparks1371 but he was. And then 3 adults tried to kill him.
@@russellb2464 unfortunately that's the USA and its dumb macho gun culture. nowhere else on earth has gun death stats like the US.
@@sparksforbrightsparks1371Perhaps the looters in rioters shouldn't have been there either.
You sound like the type of person who if you were in the same situation would have just laid down and died.
Pierce asking whether Kyle feels comfortable with making money about what is a tragic story that cost the lives of many people. Literally what Pierce does every day sinds October 8.
Piers make money of every tragedy he can.
He’s been doing that way before Oct 7.
Morgan wasn't a part of the tragedies and didn't kill anyone
@@liamthomas2014 Just a smear merchant trying to make a buck.
Makes it worse actually.@@liamthomas2014
"how does that feel for you?"
> proceeds to claim Kyle is only talking about himself
Piers is a real piece of work
That may be. But, Kyle Rittenhouse is still a selfish, self centered, bastard.
He could have said that he feels terrible for taking 2 life's, no matter if it was his fault or not. His only focus is framing that he "had" to do it otherwise he wouldn't have been here, which is another bullshit. He's been well media trained and the sociopathic characteristics are obvious. It's like speaking to a robot.
@@blackrosepanther he was found innocent in a court of law. You're wrong and I think your characterization of him is also garbage
@@blackrosepanther Why should he feel terrible for taking the lives of people who were trying to take his?
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried,
The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
This was the most clear cut case in the history of America.
Yet my guess is that Piers thinks he got off "easy"
He did
@@ChrisAlbertH47 Why?
@@chiefnama790 Cause Murica
@@ChrisAlbertH47 🧌
Because he did. *He should have gotten SOME jail time!*
Piers: asks a question
Interviewer: answers
Piers: doesnt like the answer. "You're not answering my question"
Ok Piers, its a good thing we can see and hear for ourselves.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The interviewer is Kyle writtenhouse he was a hero!!
surprised Piers did not accuse Kyle that he "crossed state lines"
He did cross state lines.
@@stephenj.schneider5185 lol why is that a thing anyway? he is in the same country lol how stupid is that argument.
Because all of that was debunked in court.
@@stephenj.schneider5185He lived with his mom in Antioch, IL, 800 yards from the state border, and 17 miles from Kenosha, WI, where he worked as a lifeguard and his dad lived. It’s not unreasonable for him to be in Kenosha.
@@stephenj.schneider5185try again
Kyle handled every single question superbly.
Put piers to shame!
yes. a true psychopath
@@MrBibi86 You're a public subscriber to Piers Morgan. That says it all😂
who said I'm a subsciber! @@Phelps-1247
@@MrBibi86You are the type who would just lay down and die if man chased youthrough a parking lot And you had a gun to defend yourself.
Oh piers stop digging for emotional responses. He said what he means... he's suffering for the decision he made but he's fully aware that if he hadn't done it, it would have been him. He has no obligation to feel any kind of guilt or remorse.
Piers doesn't seem to understand that the guy was gonna die if he didn't defend himself. Piers always let's his own emotions get in the way of his interviews. Mention, Megan Markle, Winston Churchill or Guns and he interrupts the topic to talk about them. He would be so easy to manipulate in an interview.
@@dc56789he’s asking sensible questions, and gave this guy a platform to defend his actions. Quality interview.
Why would he not feel guilt? He took 2 lives from their families. He did have the right to defend himself. Was his life at risk? Probably not, but he didn’t know that at the time. Piers asked all the right questions and gave him an opportunity to explain himself.
Why he didn’t ask him about the Palestinians and October the 7th
@@woooooooo9061 he's asking the guy if people his age at the time should be allowed guns. If this guy didn't have a gun at the time he'd be dead now. U think that's a quality interview?? The original OP is right Piers is trying to get emotional responses so he can say "even people who kill in self defence regret having a gun". Piers needs to keep his nose out of the U.S constitution before he embarrasses himself again. Ben Shapiro was right, Piers stands on the graves of gun victims but his argument has no substance.
Old Piers Morgan please, you're trying to dig up emotional response from the kid you just keep asking the same question over and over. The kid defended himself end of story.
thats old piers too
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried,
The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
@@sxnses As I said: He’ll judge you too.
Defended himself by going to a riot with a gun
@amsterdame
Um, the statement was "the kid defended himself" - was he not a kid at 17 when he defended himself??
Never underestimate the power of Stupid people in large groups.
It is foolish to chase down a retreating person with a lethal weapon, akin to a pack of Hyenas chasing a Lion who will eventually be forced to defend himself when cornered against a mob of people intent on hurting him.
The mob was terrifying to watch. I can only assume Piers didn't bother to watch that scene unfold and put himself in Kyle's shoes. Kyle was jumped by violent skateboard guy, kicked by a random, and then had a gun pointed at him by an Antifa "medic". He was retreating and going to the police. You can see him trying to turn himself in! People need to watch the source video before they have opinions about what Kyle should have done. Can't trust the media to provide fair coverage.
@gitoffmahlawn , Yes Peirs can be very pigheaded &one eyed at times .Working as a bouncer many years ago I have seen how the mob mentality of low iq pack (human) animals can behave and it is not very pleasant, terrifying to say the least .
That idiot kid should’ve never been there in the first place. How about the other angle of trying to put down a threat? He looked threatening the way he was dressed and walking around with a rifle. He Looked like every single school shooter I’ve ever seen
Yeah there's nothing more terrifying than the mob mentality. People do things they would never do alone.
@@rahrah8962In a club or bar scenario it's even worse because the moh is drunk and high 😅
I respect Piers Morgan & enjoy listening to his commentary BUT I did not enjoy this. Kyle Rittenhouse is alive due to thugs attacking him & he shot them, then they died. He does not need anyone, especially Piers, to dig his emotional wound back open for media points. I guess Piers would not protect himself from thugs trying to kill him? Kyle was focused & well spoken. I hope his book is a best seller.
Why on earth would you respect him? Just watch his biased narrative during all his Israel Palestine conflict interviews. The man has got no honor.
I agree that this is a pretty clear-cut case of self-defense, but if Rittenhouse doesn't want his emotional wounds dug back open, why is he going on interviews on huge platforms? Why is he parading himself everywhere? Don't you think it would be better for someone suffering from PTSD over killing others to keep a low profile instead of doing everything they can to remain in the spotlight?
It was self defence so he never murdered anyone
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried
@@sxnses for standing up for himself? Aye ok whatever
@@williebauld1007 like I said, karma.. the man above will be the one send him to down to where he needs to go lol
@@sxnseskarma came for your terrorist friends Joshua Ziminski, Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gaige Grosskreutz.
He’s a murderer in the eyes of the lord
I’m actually shocked Piers posted this clip. What an absolute disgrace he was treating someone who HAD to either defend himself or die (and probably worse before he died considered the rap sheet of one of his attackers) like this.
Kyle was put in an impossible, terrifying situation and had the discipline to ONLY pull the trigger on people who posed a literal deadly and imminent threat. There are trained and seasoned soldiers who don’t have this type of accuracy and discipline.
Facts. So proud of this kid
Oh shut up we both know Kyle did what he did when he was 17 because he wanted to get famous. Enough with the whole “he had to defend himself bless his cotton socks😢”. He’s now going to profit off his book that he claims is “only to tell his story”. I’m right leaning and I’m not even this much of a dumbass to believe every kid that ugly twat is saying 😂
Absolutely!!! 🤔
Exactly
He actually, didn't HAVE to do anything, if he was out there to put out fires and help people. What's the point in having a gun
So your telling me piers if you had a gun and about 3 to 4 people where rushing you with guns or trying to tackle you after you verbally warn them multiple times you wouldn’t fire warning shots? Or take them out if your life was in danger?
If nobody was allowed guns nobody would be rushing you with guns in the first damn place !!!!!
@lastrolo nobody needs to own a gun . Fact .
I watched the entire trial from start to finish. He was NOT GUILTY.
I am surprised piers didnt even ask kyle to condemn hamas
I was surprised that federal prosecutors were so lenient on Dominick Black, the 18-year-old who bought Kyle Rittenhouse the AR-15. He could have been sentenced to up to 25 years in federal prison. Instead, he got a slap on the wrist for a crime that "most adults" would have served hard time for committing. Dominick Black was shown an unreal amount of mercy.
@@Scorch1028 Did you watch the trial.....this issue was covered and your analysis differs from the lawyers. Buying the gun was legal...leaving it out of the safe thus allowing a minor access was the issue. Dominick Blacks father held the keys to the safe which he had opened the night before and failed to secure before leaving for work the following morning.
Except for the illegal straw purchased rifle he was carrying. He was commiting a felony.
Nope. And, he was acquitted for that as well.@@janicearroyo-wright8529
When someone's life is in danger, who wouldn't think about themselves?
Sure, like that was what he was thinking about 😏
@@ChrisAlbertH47wow. You’re a psychic that can read minds?
@@saie7151 Observation and assessment of his motives and behavior
@@ChrisAlbertH47
Yet you ignore those same criteria when it comes to the other party-- you know, the aggressive party.
@@WAEVOICE No, I didn't. And stop stalking me through every post I make. Don't let my opinion bother you.
Piers is one of those people who is absolutely certain he knows how to reduce crime until it happens to him. Obviously everyone that's disarmed will not get attacked by anyone so it's really the armed person's fault. And now he's a cold blooded killer despite maybe having defended himself in a very responsible way. He held off on shooting until there was a skateboard flying towards his head.
Thanks for putting your stupidity on full display Piers.
He's jealous and resentful they can't have guns over there like Americans can here.
@@Notwoke7What an idiotic comment. Yeah, Right
Actually he also had a gun pointed at him that’s when he opened fire
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried, the man above will send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
Piers has body guards. He would rather pay others to do the dirty work
It was defense not murder .
Of course. He's facing this gun grabbing mentally ill Brit.
Absolutely 👍
I used to think the opposite until I watched the trial.
@@ShouldHaveBeenAStripper save the car dealerships!
@@davidsimpson5171
Livelihoods come in many flavors, and they all don't share coverage.
Keep that mind whenever you engender a productive enterprise.
I’m from Bangladesh🇧🇩. And I know a thing or two about tyranny and authoritarianism.
Without the second amendment, you can’t possibly have any rights at all.
Boy! I’m envious of Americans freedom to bear arms.🇺🇸🫡
Lol says a lot about you
Are you questioning a person of colors lived experience?@@Spidey-2002
I suppose Piers could ask the same questions of a soldier. People defend themselves, even if it means killing the attacker(s).
Why did he go there that day with an assault rifle over his shoulder in the first place?
@@keifer7813 Because he was free to do so. Perhaps not the brightest move, but it wasn't illegal and it wasn't morally bankrupt on his part.
@@maplemutt158 Apparently it was illegal for a person his age to carry such a weapon in public. Also, you don't think he was looking for trouble at all? That's a bit like me taking a baseball bat to a football match
@@keifer7813 Perhaps he was looking for trouble. He has not said that was his motive and I can't read his mind, so I don't actually know whether he went there to help as he said or whether he was looking for trouble. Perhaps a bit of both?
@@keifer7813 Btw, he specifically said it was legal (not illegal) for him, at his age, to carry the rifle he carried that day/night. If it had been illegal, I'm confident he would have lost his court cases.
I was liking piers until this interview. Torturing this poor kid . Unsubscribed
"Torturing" the guy who killed people with... words?! 😂
@@BallJuiceOfZeusit was self defense.
The media asking if someone feels comfortable about making money from the death of others is rich, too rich for my blood.
piers is an ass for pushing him , he killed 2 people out of self defense there is no remorse to it .
For a psycho !
Dont attack people with a gun ffs! Over here in the UK i woudnt dare go near someone with a knife
natural selection at it's finest.
They did because they didnt want other people to get killed instead.
You haven’t been in a threatening position! Careful! The UK is changing and not for the better. It won’t be too long that we in the Uk might need to carry some form of protection, look at Aberfan and Ireland recently, Aberfan 9am stabbing of pregnant woman taking her child to school, kids getting stabbed in Ireland outside school. Seriously things are a lot worse in the the UK and not all of it gets to the main news
In the UK their are very harsh sentences for vigilantes. The last thing the police want is people with no training coming in, and ruining their attempts at deescalating the situation.
@@Jayess-cI've seen the videos he didn't act like a mass shooter or committed a mass shooter act
i dont think piers is wrong often, but i actual felt disgusted that he was asking him, ' how does it feel' cmon piers... your better than that. from what i saw and have researched about this situation.. this guy had every right and i would have done the same, what is piers saying you should just let yourself be killed because you shouldnt defend yourself
Thank you for saying that. The questions Piers asked and the condescending way he treated Rittenhouse was disgusting
“Who was a accused of murder while defending himself”. Fixed that for ya Piers.
who drove 20 miles - with a gun - got involved in something which was nothing to do with him ( you think the police welcome vigilantes???) - and killed people - there you go - much easier when you look at the reality
Piers, your framing of him and the interview itself has been a disgrace.. You are obviously ignorant of a huge part of the whole story, and your bias is showing.
Piers saying it how it is. Guy travelled to a different state with an assault rifle and killed two guys
@@squidguard1 he drove a short distance from his home to a place that he went to all the time anyway because his friends and one of his parents lived there, and it just so happened that the state line ran through that short distance from home - like dozens of places in the USA do.
People literally cross state lines every single day for work or school and nobody ever makes a thing about it - until a white kid had to defend himself for doing it in the woke era.
The people he defended himself against were violent thugs happy to attack what was obviously a kid, and one of them also happened to be a convicted child rapist, so if anything, KR deserves a medal.
Who knows what these creeps would have done to him or others if he hadnt acted
@@squidguard1 Ah, you are doing the exact same thing. Thanks for proving my point.
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried,
The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
@@sxnses Dude, Jeff Rosenbaum "was charged by a grand jury with 11 counts of child molestation and inappropriate sexual activity around children, including anal rape. The victims were five boys ranging in age from nine to 11 years old." He got what he deserved.
Leftism is believing Kyle is privileged and LeBron isn’t.
“Pleaded self-defense when charged with murder.” Is a hell of a way to describe that case.
Rittenhouse epitomises many of the positive attributes of the American ethos, such as, “Don’t tread on me.”
His actions were lawful, and justifiable morally.
I thought American ethos was _"Muh rights, muh freedoms, and fck everything else"_
@@ChrisAlbertH47
Through the cesspools of cyberspace, that's accurate.
@@ChrisAlbertH47 that says a lot about you pal
@@Jmr-o5e So is necroing a thread over a year old.
This guy has more balls than 99% of people. I know what happened to you changed your life but you did exactly what you needed to do. Those out of control criminals would have taken his life and our Democratic government would have applauded that. Piers you are off on your back handed attack of this hero.
He went there looking for trouble and found it. Did he need to do that too?
@@sanfrancisco89 Those rioting, burning, and looting went looking for trouble did they not?
Ya'll gave them a pass.
@@darthroach9057nope. I don’t give them a pass, but I don’t think Kyle has helped very much to make 2A Supporters look good.
A stupid kid doing stupid things.
And the criminals who attacked him were not there looking for trouble or to commit a crime? You sound like a true Democrat protecting the criminal over the hero.
A good American who exercised his right to defend himself.
but if it was a black person would it be self-defense? The justice system is racist.
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried,
The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
That's pure nonsense. Kyle Rittenhouse went to those protests looking for trouble. He NEVER served in a law enforcement capacity so his bs that he was there to protect property is nonsense. He got exactly what he was looking for. Unfortunately it's cost people their lives.
@@sxnses There is no "man above" or the "big H." LMAO
Kyle Rittenhouse is a fraud. He went to those protests looking for trouble because if he wasn't why go there with a weapon? This bs he's peddling that he went there to protect property is nonsense. It's law enforcements job to do that, not some punk kid who wasn't legally old enough to purchase the weapon on his own. He got a friend that was old enough to purchase the weapon for him. It's unfortunate that people had to die because of the actions of a coward.
My heart goes out to Kyle, he had grown adults pull firearms on him and HE’S being treated as the criminal. Piers what is a kid supposed to do when lawless adults enact violence against them?
I would’ve LOVED to be on the other end of the interview and share some solid facts with Piers.
Wtf are u talking about? Did i hear right, that he took a firearm and went to this demonstration himself??
If thats what he did- he was looking for trouble. And he is the most stupid person on this earth. And he does deserve to be in jail.
16-17 years old and has shot two people!!? Only in fucking america!! Your gun laws are a fucking joke. Any lunatic can go around with a gun. But hey, america profits from it, so who the fuck cares if their population is safe on the streets or the children are safe in school. joke of a goverment!
And he is a helluva shot. He was under attack and hit his mark of attackers no other shots.
I have enjoyed & respected many Piers interviews lately. This was not one of them. Piers asked many unfair, biased questions and expressed zero care for all he’s been through. Kyle is a young man who was forced to defend himself in a horrific situation, and he did so in a lawful way. Shame on Piers for the way he treated him here; his mind was made up already.
Agreed. Piers was deeply incurious and clearly doesn't know any of the facts. Poor showing!
@@gitoffmahlawn Yes! Deeply incurious is the *perfect* way to describe his approach to this interview!
I can only speculate here, but Piers seemed to want to provoke Kyle, as if to show his character is that of a villain. However, in contrast to that, the way Kyle conducts himself in response to Piers’s unfair treatment of him shows that he is a young man with integrity, honesty, humility, & maturity beyond his years, who knows what his life is worth and cannot be distracted from his life’s purpose.
At the VERY least, you think Piers would have at least had the common decency to acknowledge that it is a blessing Kyle is alive and wasn’t killed by the young men who pointed the guns at him.
Tragic? The only thing tragic is that Kyle can never just have a normal life now.
LMAOOO
Poor him. 🙄
@@Trooper66661 Life ruined for defending himself. Yeah, poor him.
@@samizdat113 ruined dozens of lives with his vigilante bullshit, but yeah, poor him.
@@Trooper66661what’s it like being a braindead dumbfck?
Much love from Germany to my bro Kyle 🤍
Fuckin Legend!
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried,
The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
@hyena0815 Kyle is a member of your country’s beloved Einsatzgruppen
@@sxnses You keep telling everyone that the “man above” will judge him.
1.) Your spiritual blindness illustrates you don’t believe in God
2.) God will judge you & me and every single person for every sin, every hateful word, every lustful thought, every “white lie”, every single minor offense.
Hope you realize that. Pray more.
@@tecumseh4095 Einsatzgruppen? English please?
@@tecumseh4095 do you condemn the Oct. 7th terrorist attack?
He felt the same as a soldier.
"He wrote a book" 😂🇺🇸😂
Kyle is a great example of how the media lies and persicutes gun owners. Well done on this interview Kyle way to stay respectful and get your message out.
There is an active shooter at the University of Nevada. TODAY. This is what your 2nd Amendment wreaks. Nasty, cesspit you have there.
@@pureounce.9184
Active shooters don't exercise self-defense; they also instigate.
Rittenhouse did nothing of the sort.
I feel bad for this kid, he could’ve lost his life for protecting a small business that has nothing to do with what’s going in the world, this kid protected himself legally and to be honest I would have done the same thing
this kid drove 20 miles and had no business being there - he wasn't defending a small business!! He was acting like rambo - and two people paid with their lives for his immature fantasy.
@@archietheanarchist To still be as ignorant of the facts as you are, is inexcusable.
@@spenser9908 the usual reply - don't argue the facts just a vague ad hominem reply - pathetic. You have no defence .
@@archietheanarchist You literally have no idea what you're talking about lol, you're still spouting misinformation and expect to be taken seriously.
@@spenser9908loser
Piers Morgan what would YOU have done if you were in his situation? Are you going to say that you wouldn’t have defended yourself? Word for word, what would YOU have done if your situations were reversed?
Cried his eyes out.
Correct! Furthermore, I'm thinking Piers has in some or all situations his personal security and they are armed and they are authorized to defeat the threat in whatever means they deem necessary.
He wouldn't be walking around with an assault rifle thinking he's g.i Joe, just like every person not from America lol
First would not have gone out of my state in the first place.
@@BallJuiceOfZeus If the good guys don't have guns then only the bad guys will. Look at south america, africa, the middle east. Want an oppressed population more often? Dont give them means to protect themselves.
So insensitive PIERS! Shame on you! 😫😝 BRAVO KYLE! 💪👏👌🙏
typical answer from a south african
Piers gave him a hard time over nothing. The kid doesn’t write the laws, he merely follows them. As a UK citizen like Piers, I can’t really fathom the gun culture, it doesn’t exist here. However because we can’t fathom it, we can’t just use that bias to slate someone who’s morally, and legally done nothing wrong.
Kyle is a MURDERER and should be labeled as such
Piers forgot to ask Kyle if he condemns Hamas and October 7th.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Israeli brutality started long before october 7th. Guess everyone is "fighting to defend", as Palestinians are under occupation
I was searching for this comment😂
Also searching for the Moral Quandry Piers has to deal with.
tin foil hat alert
I’d like to know Kyle’s thoughts on climate change
Piers! Piers! Piers! I just can’t watch you anymore. This interview is the pits. You interrogated this young man and he still has to defend himself. I think you have become a bully!
Yep. Piers is the bully, not the guy who shot and killed people. Do you have to have an I.q below 5 to be an american?
Well, I actually think piers voice and tone sounded more sympathetic and he seemed more behaved this usual. Yes his questions were silly. But they accurately represent to convoluted view of most liberals who are against own protection.
@@skeelatheskink8724 That would make it at best concern trolling. Every question in that interview was aimed at making Kyle out to be the villain in his own self-defence story.
The way this young man handles himself if incredible for his age… Respect
Piers Morgan....ever the objective and open-minded journalist. It makes you wonder if he's ever been in a situation where he feared losing his life at the hands of someone with ill intent. He comes off as someone who cannot fathom needing to defend your life or someone that would readily hand his life over if it was a choice between his and an attackers.
Kyle didn't have to be there at all. He could've just stayed home if he was scared.
You’re right. He went there because he was scared. Guy recounts his story thousands of times since the event and thousands of times people still read into their own convenient narrative. These same people who shouldn’t go out driving because the fact that they are wearing a seat belt means they are scared they might get into a car crash. 🙄
@TimHoefer A 17 year old brought a semiautomatic rifle to a protest he didn't have to be at because he wanted a reason to use his new toy his momma got him. If they attacked him in his home, then I'd defend him, but he chose to go there with the intent to shoot.
You’re right. What was I going on about?
@@dapper.degenerate5701 If the Democratic authorities had done their jobs instead of scoring political points to embarrass Trump and swing the 2020 election ordinary civilians wouldn't feel the need to arm themselves and protect the public. Blame the Democrats, not Kyle.
Kyle is a legend
This kid handled this masterfully! Especially at 20, wow!
He held up quite well. The guy had an absolute right to defend himself & was found to have done so legally. I hope he makes a ton of money from his book.
Looking forward to the next interview where you ask the dead. Crackheads if they regret running up threatening this kid
😂 this is great
Gold
Antifa "medic" with his own gun is still alive to answer. He doesn't have a bicep anymore, but his voice still works.
He went somewhere and had a weapon and killed two people. My black friend had someone come to his house with a gun and he defended himself but he is prison. Self defense or stand your ground rarely applies to black people.
@@Tony38533 "Jacob Blake had a knife and the very sight of that knife is what the police called a serious threat and a reasonable belief to use lethal force. So an officer shot Blake in the back 4 times and in the side 3 times. The cops did that over the threatening sight of a knife."
Oh calm TF down, Nancy. They didn't shoot him 7 times over "the sight of" the knife, or else they would have ventilated his azz long before he made it to the car door.
They shot him because, as he tried getting into HIS GF'S car WITH THEIR 3 KIDS SITTING IN THE BACK SEAT, Ofc Sheskey grabbed his shirt in a final effort to prevent his escape, car theft, and kidnapping.
And when Shesky grabbed his shirt, Black swung the knife in his right hand at Sheskey, so Sheskey FINALLY lit him up. He showed remarkable restraint until then.
Your black friend probably was dealing drugs and not standing up to a commie mob.
Unarmed civilians is bad. But having unarmed police who cant stop a knife is even WORSE
I've given this a bit of thought and I'm wondering if this simply didn't go as Piers had planned. Perhaps he had it in his mind that he was going to "rehabilitate" his image with some of the haters by drawing out statements of regret and remorse. But I think what Piers didn't take into account is that this young man lived through this horrific night and has continued to live with it every day for over 3 years. But for him to have regrets for the outcome of that night would be for him to regret choosing to live. Asking him to have empathy for the vile people who would have killed him is absurd. They showed no empathy for him or concern over killing him.
Empathy is what separates us form most animals.
Obviously Kyle has none, I mean I have seen relatives of victims forgive murderers.
Kyle is so unaware of his role in this whole case, that he looks and sounds like a psychopath, only concerned with his owned with his trauma, his life and the the money he will make with his book.
Piers: “Do you regret that you killed two young men?”
Kyle: “Piers, I was defending my life.”
Piers: “And do you ever regret that you survived?”
Kyle: “Uhmm, no, Piers.”
Piers: “But how does that make you FEEL?”
Kyle: “What does this have to do with feelings?”
Piers: “How does it feel to be leader of the nazi regime and KKK all at such a young age?”
Kyle: “……..”
Piers: “Thank you Kyle Racist… I mean Rittenhouse… for joining me today.”
😂😂😂 Hyperbole, of course, but not far off…
It's very interesting to me that Piers doesn't seem to understand that a radicalized man had a pistol pointed at this boy's face, had another man attempting to beat his face in with a 7-ply maple piece of wood with two metal trucks, and had more men attempting to remove his firearm from him at the time. It was all recorded thankfully for this kid. What would Piers have done if he found himself in the same situation?
20 year old killer in the title has me ROLLING
The title should read 20 year old HERO
Absolutely fitting of the cowards to change the title only for notifications.
@@shefalichow7917 May not be only for notifications. It's also possible to vary title by viewing region.
@@jimbobjimbob8275 are you a hero for defending yourself but not necessarily saving anybody?
@@redbellum When the same people attacking you, are rioting and could potentially harm other innocents, yes.
Why is Piers suddenly so concerned about the loss of life of two attackers when he doesn’t give a rat’s ass about the lives of innocent Palestinians?
Shockingly misread the room here, Piers. Karl handled himself admirably under pressure of this interview, for one so young.
👏for defending yourself
The Founders said nothing about "being a part of a well-regulated militia". They said one was necessary to the security of a free state. This gives a reason for, not the only reason for and not a limitation on, the right of the people (not the militia...the PEOPLE) to keep and bear arms.
Why is it that when it comes to controversial topics such as firearms the media decides to go off assumptions and emotions instead of doing research? Piers didn’t look good when he had to be corrected and it’s not the first time that he has been corrected in interviews. What I do appreciate about Piers is that he doesn’t get aggressive and fight back with the guest like others do.
To be fair to Piers (dear God, what am I saying?!?), this is largely a matter of semantics.
It was against the law locally for Kyle to purchase or own the firearm (hence why his friend bought it, and his friend's father stored it, with the intention that ownership would be transferred upon Kyle reaching the necessary age to do so).
There was, however, a carve-out in the law that permits older minors to carry rifles or shotguns with a barrel length of 16" or longer. I would guess that the spirit of that law was to allow such minors to get into hunting at an earlier age, but the letter of the law wasn't specifically written to limit such permission to carry to only be for the purposes of hunting.
In other words, they were both right. Piers was right that Kyle couldn't legally have (own) the rifle, while Kyle was right that he COULD legally have (carry) it.
@@kevreeduk222If I may, the spirit of the law was specifically written so that handguns that were used in street violence were restricted from minors but that minors were allowed to carry ordinary rifles. They didn't make the exception to older minors carrying firearms from a broad restriction on firearm carrying (itself a 2A violation but not arguing that point now), but rather the exception was to narrow the scope of the original statue under which Kyle was charged and ultimately dropped because ADA Binger and Kraus can't actually read very well (They were really poor at their task, or good depending how you see it). I'm just very disappointed Piers can't understand how a comma works, bringing up 2A in that manner. He needs to return to 8th grade and learn grammar rules and I wish I was joking.
@@dylanwarwick4429 Thanks for the clarification. In fairness, my assumptions were based on conversations within several of the livestreams around the time of the trial, rather than on the basis of any personal legal research.
Yup, Binger and Krauss were... how do I put this diplomatically... entertaining?
As for Piers, I don't think it's a misunderstanding of grammar, but more an exercise in deliberate misinterpretation. He made reference to having learned his lesson and no longer wading into the 2A debate, then basically ridiculed 2A!Disingenuous doesn't do it justice!
Love how in a really eloquent way, Kyle basically told Piers where to go, for asking him the same question hahahaaaa
Piers, I was starting to respect you as a journalist. Now I see you are still the same, biased and talking down to those who you feel are beneath you. Shame on you. Do better.
Pierce, asking the question 3 times won't change an answer. Kyle just schooled you.
He is very well spoken. Good for him
For a simpleton.
Yeah. “I had no choice”.
Yeah you didn’t HAVE to go protect a car dealership. Lmao.
Sounds like it was set up. He wanted to shoot people.
While I agree with his right to self defense I actually don't agree. Came across way too robotic and hesitant in my mind... if 2A is going to have an advocate let it be someone who can get way more ideas across in short order.
PTSD Nightmares, PTSD Nightmares trauma, PTSD Nightmares trauma. Yeah super well spoken
@@wdyrm
"Durrr I cAntZ bReAfE"
-Felony Floyd
Hey Piers! Try doing some basic research before you interview someone!
I watched a lot of the trial from NZ. He was innocent. He was attacked by some thugs, one of which was a convicted sex offender.
Piers was gentle and fair.
I thought he was guilty till I watched the court case on tv. Once he cried like a fat little btch I knew he was innocent.
....one was a convicted sex offender......you found it " the smoking gun" ( pun intended) that there proves Kyle was not only defending himself, but, you know, this guy had it coming.
Piers was gentle and fair? ROFLMAO
Piers was trying to get Kyle to say how symptomatic he may feel towards the victims family and friends. Appropriate? He handles himself very well considering his age and circumstances.
Piers needs to leave the gun debate alone . He has been destroyed on the issue countless of times
Kyle handled that interview perfectly. Kudos to him for standing up for himself and for the truth calmly and reasonably.
Kyle is an amazing young man. So brave. A real hero unlike so many fake heretics amongst us.
@@Tony38533
Blame your toplofty party-line for making him a villain in the first place.
@@Tony38533
"Get a clue," says the user who hinges on feeble hypotheticals.
"controversial", because he legally defended himself.
@@Tony38533
Nothing private about this militia.
Piers you are unbelievable! Leave the kid alone!!
His answers were scripted maybe not to the tee but he has an outline cause he was informed by his lawyers that other prosecutors would love to make a political statement by trying to get him arrested for something else.
Scripted? Lol
Piers was trying to paint a lie in this dude so hard and literally got caught in a Lie
He is on a press tour and when you get asked the same questions 10 times in a day or 2 why would you say the answer differently? Go home kiddy/gun grabbers
He didnt even acknowledge the families of the people he murdered. One of which tried to stop him from shooting the first person.
He would have had to murder someone to have needed to do that. And no the 2nd person was not anywhere near the scene of the first shooting. You really should look into getting better sources of information, unless of course you're just lieing@@Jayess-c
Piers can be such a dummy sometimes like this time.
He's no dummy, just a bad person.
What a load of stupid questions,.. Everyone trying to get either guilt or regret... Do you think it's right to be able to carry the gun that saved his life.... Naaah should only be able to carry a water pistol.
he needs to be behind bars, karma doesnt forget.. so im not too worried,
The jury found him innocent but the man above will give final judgement and send him to the place he needs to go lol, he going go the big H
Ouch, I feel dumber for hearing that.
Piers, would you ask WWII vets these same questions, or would you feel bad about the situation they were put in? In America, we have the right to bear arms, and I think this kid had a better head on his shoulders than most adults do. He did not shoot everyone attacking him. Only people whom he found to be threatening to his life, all during a chaotic situation. People screaming and yelling, helicopters overhead, gunfire going off around him, on top of, being physically assaulted and verbally being told he was going to be killed. If only more adults acted with his level-headedness during this type of situation. ONE MORE THING: People have a right to protect their property, loved ones, and businesses against a group of irrational people; defending a woman beater who disobeyed police commands after his abused wife called them; on him!
Should he have been there that night? No
Should he have brought his gun at that age? No
Did he make the right decision to protect himself and would we have all done the same in his situation? Absolutely
It's the 1st 2 questions that people seem to not understand. Dude was a minor at the time. The property he was "patrolling" wasn't his residence. It's near impossible to get your 17yo in the US military without goin through waivers. And somehow, we are supposed to ignore all that. 🤦🏾♂️
I don't disagree, but it is sad, when a simpletons actions led to deaths.
@@royboy4571
The simpletons being the party that chose to aggress an armed individual for no valid reason.
I’m disgusted. He didn’t ask him to condemn Humas. 😂
Class and tact go right out the window for Piers on this one. He got owned.
God forbid he tell his side of the story
He's been smeared by the media. They've told one lie after the next. I hope it's a best seller that goes beyond the conservative base.
He’s not infamous.
Piers doesn't realize how young the founding fathers were.
where did your founding fathers come from?
low blow from piers on this one.
Once again, Piers is embarrassing himself. Kyle Rittenhouse did NOT do anything wrong. If the 2 punks that had did what they did left Rittenhouse alone, none of this would have happened.
Full support for Kyle
Those were legitimate questions.
@@jron5113 No, those were loaded questions designed to make viewers hate Kyle. Called him a murderer despite the fact Kyle was the victim defending himself from multiple violent attackers- as confirmed by the court ruling. This whole interview was an attempted character assassination; Piers is an absolute slimeball.
Poised, articulate, logical, and immune to baiting - Well done, Kyle!
the hypocrisy of charging a kid as an adult for having a gun who is not an adult.
Piers: "How do you feel about it?"
Kyle: *answers*
Piers: "You're making everything about how YOU feel."
@@Tony38533 He took the weapon to protect himself lol. You don't get to play this card, mate, when we've literally seen him expertly use that weapon to save his life.
@@Tony38533
Binger couldn't prove any such motive-- what says you're any better at it?
The idiots that attacked him are to blame!!!!! Come on Morgan
Pierce trying to sound all deep and shit but he's just a twodge wobbler.
his responses were so scripted which is understandable considering his age. I would hope he gets interviewed in 10-15 years time when hes had time to truly reflect on what happened
No evidence of that
He has reflected and writing a book i will purchase. He is a class case of self-defense. And he offed two p*do's who shouldn't have been out of prison. Check the video.
@@dellingson4833Good god, you guys are such sensitive snowflakes.
@@dellingson4833 watched the video and I'm not accusing him of anything or saying he was wrong or bad. I just don't think this interview was natural and I would like to know how he would feel years down the line because how we perceive past events has we age change.
@@Lozza97 never said he was lying. Just saying he's responses seemed rehearsed or he has talking points he has to stick to. I never said he was wrong, never said he was guilty. I just wanted a more natural interview.
Piers forgot to ask him a very quandary question "do you condemn hamas?!"
The young man had every right to defend himself. I agree it is not an appropriate question to ask him if he feels bad about having had to defend himself against violence. Do better Pierce. He has the right to share his story. It may very well be therapeutic for him.
Kyle didn't have to be there at all. He chose to go somewhere with a gun and make himself a target. Don't cry about consequences you put yourself in. Kyle went there with the intent to use his gun.