Wow, this was brutal. First speaker on pro 2A was nothing but continuous facts and citations. Second anti 2A speaker was a 10-minute rambling on of nothing that barley even referenced the actual topic... to say he was unprepared and overwhelmed is an understatement with zero substance. Quintessential demonstration of "facts over feelings". Even in the questions and answers portion was a beating.
Criminals don't follow gun laws. The only thing you accomplish with gun laws is restricting the ability of law abiding citizens to defend themselves they're families and other innocent people. Debate over!
Levinson spent his time theorizing the What-If’s where Dr. Lot just kept coming with fact after fact after fact. Seniors vs. Freshman is not even fair.
Gun control has always been about control of someone or a group of people. There's an old saying and I'll try to get it right, "one armed man can control one hundred unarmed men, but no one can control one hundred armed men".
The framers did NOT put in the 2A due to the political situation of the time. They put in the 2A because they were good historians, and understood that ALL THROUGHOUT HISTORY, governments eventually become tyrannical and kill their own citizens after disarming them. This was true when arms were spears, swords, bows and arrows, and guns. And the framers LOGICALLY concluded that there would be tyrannical people eventually elected into our own government as well. They just wanted to make it harder for the tyrants to disarm the peasants in the USA. Patriots fighting against Redcoats was just one more example of the known history that the founders took into account - it was not THE reason they did so.
Second I watched debate mentioning Obama care like its cheap. In NYC at least the cheapest option cost about 270 dollars monthly that may not be Obamacare. Which you only use to go to different types of doctors once a year if you aren't injured. A gun is a one time payment. You can get a glock for about 500 - 600. Then you have to take a course which is about 500, the application is about 340, back ground check is about 80. The gov't is requiring at least 2.5 times the firearm up front. But you can protect your self 24/7 after that. Even training is just 30 - 40 to train for an hour.
Wow, this was brutal. First speaker on pro 2A was nothing but continuous facts and citations. Second anti 2A speaker was a 10-minute rambling on of nothing that barley even referenced the actual topic... to say he was unprepared and overwhelmed is an understatement with zero substance. Quintessential demonstration of "facts over feelings". Even in the questions and answers portion was a beating.
💯. Exactly
Criminals don't follow gun laws. The only thing you accomplish with gun laws is restricting the ability of law abiding citizens to defend themselves they're families and other innocent people. Debate over!
The counter argument and the points it immediately cedes in this argument is wild.
Thanks for this!
Levinson spent his time theorizing the What-If’s where Dr. Lot just kept coming with fact after fact after fact.
Seniors vs. Freshman is not even fair.
Gun control has always been about control of someone or a group of people. There's an old saying and I'll try to get it right, "one armed man can control one hundred unarmed men, but no one can control one hundred armed men".
The Lib s got owned again lol.
What other debate topics would you like to see?
@@EducatingForLiberty Birthright citizenship and how it has wrongly been applied for people other than Citizens and Green Card holders.
The framers did NOT put in the 2A due to the political situation of the time. They put in the 2A because they were good historians, and understood that ALL THROUGHOUT HISTORY, governments eventually become tyrannical and kill their own citizens after disarming them. This was true when arms were spears, swords, bows and arrows, and guns. And the framers LOGICALLY concluded that there would be tyrannical people eventually elected into our own government as well. They just wanted to make it harder for the tyrants to disarm the peasants in the USA.
Patriots fighting against Redcoats was just one more example of the known history that the founders took into account - it was not THE reason they did so.
Second I watched debate mentioning Obama care like its cheap. In NYC at least the cheapest option cost about 270 dollars monthly that may not be Obamacare. Which you only use to go to different types of doctors once a year if you aren't injured. A gun is a one time payment. You can get a glock for about 500 - 600. Then you have to take a course which is about 500, the application is about 340, back ground check is about 80. The gov't is requiring at least 2.5 times the firearm up front. But you can protect your self 24/7 after that. Even training is just 30 - 40 to train for an hour.
My rights arent up for debate, let alone a vote. The black flag comes in many colors, friends
I always love the training requirement, because they prefer to require criminals to be well trained. Stupid argument.