The first and third Crusades are my favorites. The first for its magnanimous unity, strength of arms and unstopped success and the third for Lionheart's undefeated prowess and legendary feats. The first Crusade has always evoked the imagery of the Lord of the Rings prologue, the War of the Last Alliance for me. "But there were some, who resisted. A last alliance of men and elves (all Europeans), marched against the armies of Mordor (Islam), and on the slopes of Mount Doom (Jerusalem), they fought for the freedom of the world".
It's not even truly fair to call it a "siege". It was the retaking of the city from people who took it by force to begin with. I think the first thing we need to do in order to help correct the history that has been so perverted for so long, is to watch our language and use terms that help tell the story more honestly. It was a repatriation of Jerusalem
@@oskarwilander3890 That's a seriously feeble question. lol And it shows an utter lack of intellect, integrity and is a gross display of bigotry on the part of anyone that would ask it. MAYBE QUIT LISTENING TO THE HISTORY TAUGHT TO YOU BY LEFTWING PERV'S BECAUSE THEY CAN'T EVEN GET BIOLOGY RIGHT.
barbarism which was punished by the great Saladin, many forget that the crusaders in the first and second crusades massacred Christians from the Middle East as they were not Europeans, which led many Frankish and Teutonic crusaders to question their march and later join Saladin. Finally, this great Muslim whom I respect a lot since I am a Christian put an end to the barbarism of the time coming from Europe.
The Crusades were 100% justified in principle and cause, but there was lots of things the Crusaders did that were very wrong. They unalived innocent civilians after capturing Antioch or Jerusalem, I might be wrong on which city, and attacked Constantinople. But unfortunately when you deal with mere men, you will have such atrocities committed. Overall, I do support the Crusades and see it as necessary against Islamic aggression that was started in the 7th century to 20th century, and somewhat in present times. It’s a complex topic.
It’s either justified when it comes to Antioch and Jerusalem. Most of the Civilians, mostly Muslims might revolt with their Jihad technique and there are young people who wanted to become a Muslim soldier. I don’t really like when they affect the Eastern Christians unjustly as well as Muslims and Jews who are moral and ignorant with their law without complimenting to become Christians. God does not command them unlike in the Bible and children are not crack heads unlike the Canaanites. The Crusades is mostly defending themselves from hundreds of years of being pillaged.
@ I don’t agree with your opinion on the unaliving of the Muslim and Jewish civilians, I don’t know how this can be justified. You mind elaborating on this?
@@brandonmireles3249Do you understand that there are stages within Jihad and the Talmud? If Muslims are in Majority then there wont be Christians and Jews but Muslims in a unjust manner. Christians were persecuted and suffered from the hands of Muslims under the Majority. There is a book called Defenders of the West by Raymond Ibrahim of how Christians were treated. I agree it’s not justified. I only say it’s either. I don’t know but I need to know again because I realized.
@ Nvm. I realized. Too be honest, I felt the lost of civilians. But thank you for making me realized. The Crusades aim was NOT to murder but to defend themselves from Islam.
I have a question. I constantly see on this channel how multiplayer battles are used in conjunction with mods here in Attila. To depict historical battles. Now I tried to play a multiplayer battle with mods with a friend. However, we are told in the lobby that we have a different version of the game. Even though we have the same game versions, have the same mods activated, the mods are in the same order and the game is in English. Does anyone know what it could be?
Şövalyeler pek iyi değil. O zamanlar surcoat kullanılmıyordu. Askerî tarikatlar da yoktu, yani onların armalarının olduğu surcoatlar da olmamalıydı. Surcoatlar 12. yüzyılda ortaya çıkıp 13. yüzyılda yaygınlaştı. Assembly Kit ile düzeltilebilir.
Thank you for the feedback, I did what I could with what I had. No military orders are depicted in the video though, I'm pretty sure most of the crosses are generic, except for the Cross of Jerusalem, which was chosen as their symbol by the Pope at the Council of Constanza. So having the Cross of Jerusalem in their shields and banner should be historical.
If we read the Muslim writers of that time, we can see that Muslims and Christians both believed that Jesus would come at that time and the end of the world would come at that time, but that did not happen.
Please make the Battle of Karbala , you'll never regret it it's a battle of Hussain against Yazid 72 men vs an army of at least 4000 there's a Sunni narration and Shia narration , I recommend the Shia narration but you do what ever you want
@MadMatTom7769 all muslims know about this battle and no one denies it 0 but some of them try to hide it from public because of what Yazid did to the grandson of prophet Muhammad (pbuh) You can Google it if you don't believe me
My study shows me anointed king David's son absalom tried to over throw his fathers kingship but Davids God would not permit it and tribes of Israel rebeled forming a cult of strays no longer following the true God muslim was formed and somewhat I believe in gods form from the region of Israel crusaders where sent to punish there was no peace even till this day may the prince of peace shine on all😊
Another great victory for the Christians yes. Where the Eastern Romans under Prince Theodore defeated muslim arabs of the emerging caliphate, including a certain Khalid Ibn-Al-Walid whom muslims still claim was undefeated throughout his career. Hilariously enough, muslim sources of Ibn Ashaq and Al-Waquidi tried to exaggerate Christian numbers immensily, writing that they had up to a 100,000 men and even 200,000. When in reality it was likely beneath 10,000. I suppose muslim pride was hurt pretty bad that day.
@@alexanderb5726 Did you have an IQ drop to write what you did write?? The guy is just requesting that the battle of Mu'tah be made in a video. Also no, it wasn't victory for the christians, their casualties were higher and they abandoned the battlefield because they thought the Muslims recived reinforcements. Khalid ibn al-Walid didn't lead the battle but at the last phast that stopped the Roman advance and did the trick that made them retreat and then he took the Army back to Arabia So yes Khalid ibn al-Walid is undefeated and theodore was defeated by Khalid later again in battle of Ajnadyin that made Heraclius, his own brother, banish him from the leadership of the army and all theodre did was to moan that the defeat was due to Heraclius marriage of his own niece Martina😂
@@alexanderb5726 Lol, biggest battles fought on european soil had around 45 thousands both parties combined (like grunwald or 100years war battles) I never heard of that battle before
The earliest written record referring to Palestine as a geographical region is in the Histories of Herodotus in the 5th century BCE, which calls the area Palaistine, referring to the territory previously held by Philistia, a state that existed in that area from the 12th to the 7th century BCE. While Palestine's boundaries have changed throughout history, it has generally comprised the southern portion of regions such as Syria or the Levant. Terms like Pāleśtīnā and Fālasṭīn are sometimes used in secular historical contexts to refer to the land when it is under European or Arab control, respectively.
@@ronnyohl It's true that the Romans renamed Israel to Palestine as a kind of insult or punishment to further separate the Jewish people from their homeland. Unfortunately, many people are too engrossed in their religious views and the news to notice this reality, so they continue to be in ignorance. The kingdom of Israel and Judah existed long before any invasion, beginning with the twelve tribes of Israel.
@@ronnyohl It's true that the Romans renamed Israel to Palestine as a kind of insult or punishment to further separate the Jewish people from their homeland. Unfortunately, many people are too engrossed in their religious views and the news to notice this reality, so they continue to be in ignorance. The kingdom of Israel and Judah existed long before any invasion, beginning with the twelve tribes of Israel.
![The Siege of Jerusalem (70 AD) - The Great Jewish Revolt [FULL DOCUMENTARY]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/y741QbT1YEo/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Siege of Jerusalem (70 AD) - The Great Jewish Revolt [FULL DOCUMENTARY]](/img/tr.png)
I'm always impressed by your engaging historical narratives and the high quality of your video production
This is my favorite channel. The videos on your channel are always high quality and even educational, so they are always fun to watch.🔥
The first and third Crusades are my favorites. The first for its magnanimous unity, strength of arms and unstopped success and the third for Lionheart's undefeated prowess and legendary feats. The first Crusade has always evoked the imagery of the Lord of the Rings prologue, the War of the Last Alliance for me. "But there were some, who resisted. A last alliance of men and elves (all Europeans), marched against the armies of Mordor (Islam), and on the slopes of Mount Doom (Jerusalem), they fought for the freedom of the world".
her zaman yenidiniz.gene yenileceksiniz.armageddon yaklaştı ....
It's not even truly fair to call it a "siege". It was the retaking of the city from people who took it by force to begin with. I think the first thing we need to do in order to help correct the history that has been so perverted for so long, is to watch our language and use terms that help tell the story more honestly. It was a repatriation of Jerusalem
Be serious. Retaken by who? The Franks didn’t live there. Who did they repatriate?
@@oskarwilander3890 That's a seriously feeble question. lol And it shows an utter lack of intellect, integrity and is a gross display of bigotry on the part of anyone that would ask it.
MAYBE QUIT LISTENING TO THE HISTORY TAUGHT TO YOU BY LEFTWING PERV'S BECAUSE THEY CAN'T EVEN GET BIOLOGY RIGHT.
@@oskarwilander3890 right I was asking the same question
@@oskarwilander3890its a Christian city under the roman and then byzantine, the muslim came and conquer it then the crusaders retak it back
Retake of what?? Yours??? you bluffing
Nice video and thanks for using our mod! :)
Great video, you should do Antioch next!
I think this video is a great resource for anyone interested in the history of the Crusades.
03:07 "Bonk"
دائما أحب طريقتك في سرد الأحداث التاريخية.
دائما متميز في إنتاجك للفديوهات
Total war always remain to my taste
@@dr.peanutsheesh6176 it's the best 👌
wowwwww wat a great channel...like and subs.
Now we're talking buddy.
Deus Lo Vult!!!
What software do you use to make these amazing videos?
Vous avez raison de parler de Raymond de saint Gilles, duc de narbonne et comte de Toulouse 😊
Un vero piacere di vista 😊❤😊
barbarism which was punished by the great Saladin, many forget that the crusaders in the first and second crusades massacred Christians from the Middle East as they were not Europeans, which led many Frankish and Teutonic crusaders to question their march and later join Saladin. Finally, this great Muslim whom I respect a lot since I am a Christian put an end to the barbarism of the time coming from Europe.
Можете сказати що це за мод?)
Great video!
DEUS VULT!!! ✝️👑
AVE MARIA!
The Crusades were 100% justified in principle and cause, but there was lots of things the Crusaders did that were very wrong. They unalived innocent civilians after capturing Antioch or Jerusalem, I might be wrong on which city, and attacked Constantinople. But unfortunately when you deal with mere men, you will have such atrocities committed. Overall, I do support the Crusades and see it as necessary against Islamic aggression that was started in the 7th century to 20th century, and somewhat in present times. It’s a complex topic.
It’s either justified when it comes to Antioch and Jerusalem.
Most of the Civilians, mostly Muslims might revolt with their Jihad technique and there are young people who wanted to become a Muslim soldier.
I don’t really like when they affect the Eastern Christians unjustly as well as Muslims and Jews who are moral and ignorant with their law without complimenting to become Christians.
God does not command them unlike in the Bible and children are not crack heads unlike the Canaanites. The Crusades is mostly defending themselves from hundreds of years of being pillaged.
@ I don’t agree with your opinion on the unaliving of the Muslim and Jewish civilians, I don’t know how this can be justified. You mind elaborating on this?
@@brandonmireles3249Do you understand that there are stages within Jihad and the Talmud?
If Muslims are in Majority then there wont be Christians and Jews but Muslims in a unjust manner.
Christians were persecuted and suffered from the hands of Muslims under the Majority.
There is a book called Defenders of the West by Raymond Ibrahim of how Christians were treated.
I agree it’s not justified. I only say it’s either. I don’t know but I need to know again because I realized.
@ I get it, I already know about this persecution. I just think it’s not right to slay the women and children.
@ Nvm. I realized. Too be honest, I felt the lost of civilians.
But thank you for making me realized.
The Crusades aim was NOT to murder but to defend themselves from Islam.
I have a question. I constantly see on this channel how multiplayer battles are used in conjunction with mods here in Attila. To depict historical battles. Now I tried to play a multiplayer battle with mods with a friend. However, we are told in the lobby that we have a different version of the game. Even though we have the same game versions, have the same mods activated, the mods are in the same order and the game is in English. Does anyone know what it could be?
هل من الممكن أن تصنع فيديو عن معركة مصر بين روما و إمبراطورية تدمر التي قادها الجنرال التدمري زابداس
what game is this?
Total War: Attila - 1212 AD mod probably
Şövalyeler pek iyi değil. O zamanlar surcoat kullanılmıyordu. Askerî tarikatlar da yoktu, yani onların armalarının olduğu surcoatlar da olmamalıydı. Surcoatlar 12. yüzyılda ortaya çıkıp 13. yüzyılda yaygınlaştı.
Assembly Kit ile düzeltilebilir.
Thank you for the feedback, I did what I could with what I had.
No military orders are depicted in the video though, I'm pretty sure most of the crosses are generic, except for the Cross of Jerusalem, which was chosen as their symbol by the Pope at the Council of Constanza. So having the Cross of Jerusalem in their shields and banner should be historical.
That was a good one!
If we read the Muslim writers of that time, we can see that Muslims and Christians both believed that Jesus would come at that time and the end of the world would come at that time, but that did not happen.
What about ditches in front of Jérusalem walls?
love it
is this rome II or Attila ?
It says 1000 AD mod which is Rome 2.
❤❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊❤❤
The Crusades 🎉
Strangely enough, they're using a video game to illustrate the whole battle. Unlike the old days.😅😅😂
Some "special" people: BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CIVILIANS!?
Me:.....its called war and ist very, very, very messy
God knows his own
Damn bro you're such a sigma
Please make the Battle of Karbala , you'll never regret it
it's a battle of Hussain against Yazid
72 men vs an army of at least 4000
there's a Sunni narration and Shia narration , I recommend the Shia narration but you do what ever you want
Seems like fairy tale to me
@MadMatTom7769 all muslims know about this battle and no one denies it 0 but some of them try to hide it from public because of what Yazid did to the grandson of prophet Muhammad (pbuh)
You can Google it if you don't believe me
Can we get reconquista next?
Great video ❤
The jeruselam is own to christian and jews
Thousands died all in the name of religion and a benevolent and merciful God.
Go cry somewhere else.
Well, go ahead and cry.
The crusaders use the name of jesus christ as an excuse for their crimes, they are nothing but hypocrites
Try millions
That’s what happens when you poke the bear. What’s better a false prophet that was a pdfile warlord that’s named Mohammad??
A fordítás/ferdítés sokkal rosszabb mint a gagyi videojáték.
My study shows me anointed king David's son absalom tried to over throw his fathers kingship but Davids God would not permit it and tribes of Israel rebeled forming a cult of strays no longer following the true God muslim was formed and somewhat I believe in gods form from the region of Israel crusaders where sent to punish there was no peace even till this day may the prince of peace shine on all😊
Battle OF Mu'tah
Another great victory for the Christians yes. Where the Eastern Romans under Prince Theodore defeated muslim arabs of the emerging caliphate, including a certain Khalid Ibn-Al-Walid whom muslims still claim was undefeated throughout his career. Hilariously enough, muslim sources of Ibn Ashaq and Al-Waquidi tried to exaggerate Christian numbers immensily, writing that they had up to a 100,000 men and even 200,000. When in reality it was likely beneath 10,000. I suppose muslim pride was hurt pretty bad that day.
@@alexanderb5726
Did you have an IQ drop to write what you did write??
The guy is just requesting that the battle of Mu'tah be made in a video.
Also no, it wasn't victory for the christians, their casualties were higher and they abandoned the battlefield because they thought the Muslims recived reinforcements.
Khalid ibn al-Walid didn't lead the battle but at the last phast that stopped the Roman advance and did the trick that made them retreat and then he took the Army back to Arabia
So yes Khalid ibn al-Walid is undefeated and theodore was defeated by Khalid later again in battle of Ajnadyin that made Heraclius, his own brother, banish him from the leadership of the army and all theodre did was to moan that the defeat was due to Heraclius marriage of his own niece Martina😂
@@alexanderb5726 Lol, biggest battles fought on european soil had around 45 thousands both parties combined (like grunwald or 100years war battles) I never heard of that battle before
@@MadMatTom7769 As I said the numbers were laughably exaggerated by Muslims. And the battle of Mu'tah is a google search away.
@@MadMatTom7769 As I said the numbers were laughably exaggerated by muslims. And the battle of Mu'tah is a google search away if you do not know it.
Who’s attacking and who’s defending 😅😅😅
🇵🇸🇹🇷🕋🌹🇸🇾🇮🇷🇮🇱🇮🇶
Someone else saw the US flag on a crossbow men shield?
That's the County of Provence mate
😢
1ST CRUSADE WERE AGAINST YADVINGIANS-SLAVIC TRIBE THAT EAVEN VIKINGS FEAR !!!
YA ALLAH, TRAGEDY JERUSALEM 💔😔😞
十字軍の最初の侵攻でエルサレムを征服し、この後サラディンが奪還するまで100年近く実行支配していた。
No shock
salahudin merebut kembali
Jesus Christ won this battle. Satan lost.
DEUS VULT
E parla Italiano !
There has never been a land of the Palestine
No plans, cards, kind of stupid made
No such thing Palestine especially in 1099. The whole area was called the Levant.
Check me...
I love how you try and change history...
Bull crap.
The earliest written record referring to Palestine as a geographical region is in the Histories of Herodotus in the 5th century BCE, which calls the area Palaistine, referring to the territory previously held by Philistia, a state that existed in that area from the 12th to the 7th century BCE.
While Palestine's boundaries have changed throughout history, it has generally comprised the southern portion of regions such as Syria or the Levant.
Terms like Pāleśtīnā and Fālasṭīn are sometimes used in secular historical contexts to refer to the land when it is under European or Arab control, respectively.
😎
Sh*t up soap
@@ronnyohl It's true that the Romans renamed Israel to Palestine as a kind of insult or punishment to further separate the Jewish people from their homeland. Unfortunately, many people are too engrossed in their religious views and the news to notice this reality, so they continue to be in ignorance. The kingdom of Israel and Judah existed long before any invasion, beginning with the twelve tribes of Israel.
@@ronnyohl It's true that the Romans renamed Israel to Palestine as a kind of insult or punishment to further separate the Jewish people from their homeland. Unfortunately, many people are too engrossed in their religious views and the news to notice this reality, so they continue to be in ignorance. The kingdom of Israel and Judah existed long before any invasion, beginning with the twelve tribes of Israel.
12500+1500 = 14000, not 13000
Deus Vult ✝☦