How to use the AGM-45A Shrike || DCS F-4E Phantom II

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ค. 2024
  • Quick and dirty tutorial on basic shrike usage. Might do a more in depth tutorial at a later date.
    0:00 Introduction
    0:40 Shrike Seeker Types
    3:27 Preparing Your Shrikes
    4:04 Shrike Usage
    4:54 Outro
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 80

  • @DaveGamingDCS
    @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I have made a spreadsheet of the Shrike seekers and what radars they can be used against with the help of Jusik: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRgH8DXRzQc6-ZV17IFFr4axXwvWORmc3BmgIN8LuNpP1QSVQ9eukN1Z2FzjRmmLaSG1XsQkI7392v_/pubhtml

    • @Ophois47
      @Ophois47 หลายเดือนก่อน

      TY so much

    • @georobGWJ
      @georobGWJ หลายเดือนก่อน

      They don't work at all against ZSU-23 radars as far as I can tell. 😅

    • @beeengineer
      @beeengineer หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do any of the seekers work with the sa3, I don't see it on the spreadsheet?

    • @paxtonbirch247
      @paxtonbirch247 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The mk36, mk 37, and the mk49 mod 1 seeker heads can target the sa3 as mentioned on the spreadsheet ​@@beeengineer

  • @nikkis0981
    @nikkis0981 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Great straight to the point tutorial

  • @Deltarious
    @Deltarious หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    ED has said they'll work on it but right now we don't have the real main impact and effect of the Shrike- the threat of it *existing* in a theatre forcing SAM operators to change their behaviour and radiate *a lot* less, thereby increasing overall survivability rates. Previously SAM operators were free to be 'on the air' as much as they wanted with little downside leaving them free to get the most out of their radar sets and allowing them the best chance possible of tracking a target and guiding a missile to them. With the development of ARMs like the Shrike the operators now had no choice but to be careful when and how they would choose to go on the air for fear of being detected and having an ARM lobbed at them. They don't need to have a 100% success rate to be such a big threat they can't be ignored, since one Shrike can disable the operational use of the site leaving it vulnerable to attack, and if they *do* operate continuously the chance the Shrike works properly and hits them is way bigger.
    When/if they do get updated with more complex behaviour it will be both more difficult to get a hit with a Shrike but also more safe overall from any one site since they cannot just blindly radiate whenever they see a threat

    • @Pokri-eg9ud
      @Pokri-eg9ud หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It could be also hoped for to get realistic SAM behavior with different modes of operation and less dumb things like hitting the ground.

    • @kypdurron62
      @kypdurron62 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is a mod called Skynet that turns off radars when they are being fired upon

    • @blanchbacker
      @blanchbacker หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting point, makes sense

    • @larrysteve7272
      @larrysteve7272 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'd highly recommend you look into the Skynet mod. It makes SAM sites much more intelligent compared to the base game. SAMs with this mod will not emit constantly and will only turn on their radar once you are in range as detected by early warning radars. They will also shut down their radar if they detect a ARM in the air. This is the point of the AGM-45 to suppress SAM sites, not destroy them. If they shut down their radar they wont be able to shoot at you or the incoming raid behind your suppression mission

    • @aaronwhite1786
      @aaronwhite1786 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It'll definitely be nice if they can make the actual radar dish itself more delicate, to better represent the way the missiles would work in real life.
      It's also going to be great when they add something like what Skynet does, so you can just easily throw SAM sites into the mission editor without the scripting backend. I imagine these are the kinds of changes that are going to come as they continue to develop the Dynamic Campaign engine, since you almost have to have it for the SAM/AAA systems to not cripple the computer by all being active at once, but also to make the SEAD/DEAD missions more fun and challenging.

  • @TFT-bp8zk
    @TFT-bp8zk หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    “Mk” is pronounced “Mark” because it’s the abbreviation for Mark. It’s also faster to say “Mark” than it is to say “emm-kay”.
    Go forth and do great things.

    • @Fahreun
      @Fahreun หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🤓☝

    • @johnhermann7498
      @johnhermann7498 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Beat me to it!
      I notice a lot of non-Americans on TH-cam say "Em-Kay" instead of "Mark"...

  • @fear2218
    @fear2218 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great tutorial and easy to follow. Thank you

  • @OperatorAron
    @OperatorAron หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    exacly what i was looking for! respect

  • @wokkus5610
    @wokkus5610 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very organized and informative. Thanks

  • @jamesbeach5445
    @jamesbeach5445 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thank god someone that dosent take 45 minutes to explain how to use something

  • @abbyabs4836
    @abbyabs4836 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks nice and clear straight to the point!

  • @zachansen8293
    @zachansen8293 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks for a short video and chapters in the timeline!

  • @CasmoTV
    @CasmoTV หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    well done.

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thank you, Casmo. Big fan of your work

  • @wahtx7717
    @wahtx7717 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    A4e prepared me well for this plane

  • @agidotexe7167
    @agidotexe7167 หลายเดือนก่อน

    truely one of the weapons of all time

  • @jeffpv7468
    @jeffpv7468 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is there a chart I can quick reference with each missle seeker type and SA-XX radars?

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRgH8DXRzQc6-ZV17IFFr4axXwvWORmc3BmgIN8LuNpP1QSVQ9eukN1Z2FzjRmmLaSG1XsQkI7392v_/pubhtml

    • @jeffpv7468
      @jeffpv7468 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DaveGamingDCS oh my god thank you, I've been looking everywhere for this but couldn't find it

  • @March-man
    @March-man หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video, Do you have any specific sound settings? 'Cause it sounds great Bass.

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not really, sorry

  • @cameraman502
    @cameraman502 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm disappointed Heatblur didn't include the AGM-78 Standard ARM along with the Shrike. The F-4E could use the Standard ARM, though it was rare cause it was an expensive missile and thus only given to units specifically for wild weasels. Still.

  • @hybridtechowns
    @hybridtechowns หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    just tested this. apparently you can only fire one at a time, the previously fired will self destruct if you ripple a second one. interesting.

    • @XCougar85X
      @XCougar85X หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not true. You can even fire all 4.

  • @AnthonyAdrianAcker
    @AnthonyAdrianAcker หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I finally got a hit and kill after realizing I needed to raise my altitude. I tried firing them from 20k feet and 6-7miles range and they finally hit!

  • @l.a.xgunner
    @l.a.xgunner หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I feel like I'm doing something wrong, I did everything in the toturial but they just keep overshooting or falling short. Is there something I'm missing?

  • @AnthonyAdrianAcker
    @AnthonyAdrianAcker 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I can't seem to get any tone on SA-19s with MK 23 or 50 guidance. Seems like 24.5 will track without tone.

  • @kypdurron62
    @kypdurron62 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dave, any hope of the Shrike being useable against some Blufor SAMs for servers where the F-4 is on Red?

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน

      In theory yes, as long as the Shrike seeker is looking for guidance bands that Blufor SAMs use then they should guide in them. 😊

  • @mr.jimjam3443
    @mr.jimjam3443 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    whats the range of the shrike and does the mk50 work on more modern system such as the sa15 and sa10?

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Effective range is approximately 6-7 miles. The Mk50 does work for the SA-15 and SA-10

  • @MrOverDroid
    @MrOverDroid หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Quick question, is it possible to change the guidance unit on the ground with the mission running?

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes. You can do this through the re-arm/refuel menu on the ground. Just click the little yellow triangle to the top left of the shrike missile icon

    • @MrOverDroid
      @MrOverDroid หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DaveGamingDCS Thank you very much

  • @flynowire6588
    @flynowire6588 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello. I dont understand why i cant find the SA6 TR with the MK25 but with the MK49 its fine. But in your spreadsheet it shows that with the MK25 it is possible to attack the SA6? Do i something wrong with the MK25 seaker or is the info in your spreadsheet not right?

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Mk25 seeker can track the SA-6 but it has no tone. That's a bug presumably

    • @flynowire6588
      @flynowire6588 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DaveGamingDCS Ah okay. Thank you for your answer

  • @Preest80
    @Preest80 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where do you get the data on what seeker head is for what type of SAM?

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Trial and error, trying different seekers and what radars they work against. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRgH8DXRzQc6-ZV17IFFr4axXwvWORmc3BmgIN8LuNpP1QSVQ9eukN1Z2FzjRmmLaSG1XsQkI7392v_/pubhtml

  • @SDsc0rch
    @SDsc0rch หลายเดือนก่อน

    ok, yeah.. I'll sub

  • @triplemurray
    @triplemurray หลายเดือนก่อน

    Any idea whick MK to use for SA-8? I'm not getting a tone just what sounds like weak morse code

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน

      docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRgH8DXRzQc6-ZV17IFFr4axXwvWORmc3BmgIN8LuNpP1QSVQ9eukN1Z2FzjRmmLaSG1XsQkI7392v_/pubhtml

  • @andymac2093
    @andymac2093 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what is the agm-45 selector for ? I couldnt fire in that mode only direct whats the point of a whole section on the weapon selector when it doesnt work

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I believe its for when you use the AGM-45 with the WRCS panel. Quite advanced stuff in comparison but I can't imagine it being that useful in DCS.

  • @mustezdcs6329
    @mustezdcs6329 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi mate could u please do a full AA weapon deployment please

  • @TamaJatu
    @TamaJatu หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can the Mk50 Seeker be used against SA-6 and SA-11?

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Mk50 can't see either. For an SA-6, you'd want the Mk49 seeker.
      There is no seeker that works for the SA-11 from what I can tell

    • @TamaJatu
      @TamaJatu หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DaveGamingDCS Thanks for letting me know!

  • @Cooper_013
    @Cooper_013 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i do eerything he does, but i don't get that high pitch tone, i get a lower pitch tone, and the missile launches, but doesn't track at all

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Shrike seekers are a bit bugged at the moment so it could be two things, either you have the wrong seeker for the type of radar you're shooting at, or the seeker does actually have a lock on the radar but it doesn't give a tone. If your case is the latter then you can still fire your shrikes and they will guide

    • @Cooper_013
      @Cooper_013 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Was trying for theSA-2, fan songs, initially with the e band, mk24 mod 5 and mod 34, (tried narrow and broad) I got no tone at all, shrike’s wouldn’t even fire. Then tried the mk 37 mod 0, got tone but they didn’t track.

  • @iou0
    @iou0 หลายเดือนก่อน

    weapon selector has agm-45 setting. wonder why that isn't used.

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is for the WRCS mode of shrike delivery. I'll have a video on that after the next DCS update when the shrikes are hopefully fixed

  • @johnhermann7498
    @johnhermann7498 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I qm really hoping that Heatblur updates the module so the Phantom can carry the HARM....

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can't see that happening anytime soon unless HB models export variants of the F-4. Or the F-4G

    • @johnhermann7498
      @johnhermann7498 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DaveGamingDCS that would be a real shame considering a) the F-4E could carry the HARM during the sunset of it's career and b) there are mods available that let even the A-10 carry the system.

    • @SignumCruxis0
      @SignumCruxis0 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@johnhermann7498 The F-4G can carry HARMS because its a dedicated wild weasel variant, the F-4E cannot.

    • @johnhermann7498
      @johnhermann7498 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SignumCruxis0 Saw it with my own eyes dude and talked to the pilots...
      EDIT: Just after posting this, I see that Growling Sidewinder has posted a Video of the F-4E carrying FOUR HARMs...

  • @atempestrages5059
    @atempestrages5059 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    AI voice? I could hear a clear Aussie accent which seemed to drop completely into an American one for second at a time.

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      no comment

    • @atempestrages5059
      @atempestrages5059 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DaveGamingDCS You'll come a Waltzing the Star Spangled Banner with me. ;)

  • @jarllunde
    @jarllunde หลายเดือนก่อน

    The agm-45 shrike. It shrikes sam sites

  • @LeoH3L1
    @LeoH3L1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not getting any tone with these.

  • @qwerty85620
    @qwerty85620 หลายเดือนก่อน

    every youtuber shrike video is not working

  • @Nick-sm6hx
    @Nick-sm6hx หลายเดือนก่อน

    doesnt work for me missle doesnt give me any tone

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน

      What seeker are you using and what radar are you trying to fire at?

    • @Nick-sm6hx
      @Nick-sm6hx หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DaveGamingDCS do i need a different seeker for different radars? sorry i just skipped to the part where you explain how to use it

    • @DaveGamingDCS
      @DaveGamingDCS  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Nick-sm6hx You do yes. This is very old technology compared to the AGM-88C, so you need to know what SAM site you're going to fire the shrikes at and equip the correct seekers for it on the ground.

    • @Nick-sm6hx
      @Nick-sm6hx หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DaveGamingDCS oh okay

    • @Uselessnoobcow
      @Uselessnoobcow หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Amusing that you made this comment without watching the full video 😂