In my South India ..... Karnataka Kerala Telangana ap .. fair to brown yellowish skin hai ....aur straight hair bhi hai... Sharp facial structure ....but malayali Have curly hair .... With fair skin Sharp facial structure .... Tamilnadu people are dark skin
One point: Horses may not be native to India but horses existed in India. If horses didn't exist in India, how do we explain cave paintings of Bhimbetka in Madhya Pradesh which depict the horse riding people? Bhimbetka paintings are 10,000 years old.
YOu use the term evidence -but without full evidence and influenced evidence you cannot know the truth-unless you get out of the mindset that only evidence is what is seen now and past evidence though not suited to our appreciation of seeing is believing and past write ups and evidence on temples are rubbish-you are bias and people pleasing-not searching or accepting of the truth-there is evidence suggesting a very good possibility rubbishing the Aryan invasion theory. And yet we want to believe non scientific methods and call it science or prove as close as rubbish concept. So not impressed. I thought your channel was to search for the truth not just listen to old forced colonial known theories forced on us. By your and his theory that science is correct because Universities teach sot the what about the false and modified teachings in US about their own religion full of violence and them modifying our stuff-how is that correct and scientific-because it is the west? Why despite evidence correction of rubbish theories unacceptable or rubbished?
When no one in India was interested in history, when Brahmins had forgotten meaning of Sanskrit shlokas, its the foreign historians who discovered and praised IVC, deciphered Brahmi script, made Sanskrit/Buddhism/Yoga/Indian Temple architecture popular. Our ruling party blindly loves it when narrative fits their agenda, but claims as European conspiracy when it doesn't. Hypocrisy ki bhi seema hoti hai. There is plenty of new scientific evidence from last few decades to prove AMT. However there is no use sharing it as these folks won't accept it. The whole world can see that this is a narcissistic bipolar attitude and they harbor a deep inferiority feeling stemming from a hurt pride. Feel sorry for them. A civilization doesn't have to be the oldest to be respected. Else there would have been no respect for Roman history. I am still proud of our ancient culture and Arya Maryada Purushottam Ram is my role model.
First chariot was found in India during a archeologic dig in Sanauli which has been dated back to 4000 years or more !! So idk how he reached to the conclusion of India not having horses but had chariots dating back that old is beyond my understanding and the Aryan Invasion myth has been busted way too many times now. Why keep bringing it back again and again ?
The sanauli chariot was a bullock cart. It didnt have spoked wheels. Spoked wheels are what gives a war chariot it's mobility. As of now there have been no historical discoveries which prove that aryan migration didnt happen. Now if you bring up rakhigarhi excavation, the DNA from that specimen too confirms it did was ASI dna, which also confirms the theory.
Recently done Sinauli excavations.....resulted in discovery of Chariots and weapons of Mahabharata period.....it raises questions on validity of Aryan or Indo European invasion theories.....
How many chariots and horses were found in europe ? If digging horses are the only base then dragon skeleton found in africa or america...so they should claim that chinese people were invaded by african or american cuz they belive in dragon and that belief was bring by african or american from africa or america to china before chinese civilization?
Horses have been mentioned in ancient indian scriptures that are thousands of years old. Ramayana: Ashwamegh yagya. Mahabharata: Krishna was a charioteer for Arjuna. I'd love if Ranveer can invite an expert like Nilesh Nilkanth Oak to shed some light on the topic. Counter view is crucial on such matters.
Ramayana and mahabharata are layered texts. Many new passages were added to it over time. Original Events around which the whole stories are added are thought to have occurred around 1300-900bc. Nilesh Oak's work is astrological based not scientific, You can check david maino's critic video of how he has arrived at those dates.
Our Indian society is more like 2 sides of a coin! We are so curious to know about the origin of our ethnicity and yet leave no possibility to judge ourselves based on surnames and categories.🤨😐
What has origin to do it, knowing someone with surname? You see, we are not savages or hippies, we carry the values of our ancestors at least for a few generation.
I guess human has always been curious also nothing is perfect and everything does have loopholes including human psychology so though people are getting more and more educated but still they wanna know their origin and thays alright. Now thats upto them how they digest it but in my opinion its gonna be fine because of the open mindness and the fact that every life matters.
Don't go on language and Genetics because genetic always evolve it will change some 10k to 20k y and language always spreds you will never get Reality only way to find the truth go on Culture because Cultures are made according weather and Geography this is why India has too much diversity East,west, South,North everywhere Culture little bitt different because india has different Weather in every 200km,and go back to 8000 to 7000y back there is sign any Tribe only developed Civilization there is not a single Ancient Civilization was Advance that India did migretion only happened out of india not inside india.
Watch Abhijit chavda sir for detailed explaination of This false theory which was written by Muller who didnt come to India. Mughals were Indians and Indians are central Europeans😂😂😂 People from some communities never fail to dissapoint when it comes to showing Their hidden hatred for Bharatiya civilization.
Har cheez jo tumhe pasand nhi wo Muller ne likhi , Wa bhai waa Taliya bajao inke liye , nakhuno se Beta , Muller ko toh chhod hi do Mahabharata me bhi Aryans ka mention milta hai Ab bol ki Mahabharata bhi Muller ne likhi hai Wo abhijeet , jisko kuch nhi pata Indian history ke baare me Bass fan favourite banne ke liye kuch bhi bolta rehta hai He said that sati was introduced by Britishers to divide and rule stuff But sati was a very old practice , and we can find it's proofs in shiv puran as well Ab bol ki shiv puran bhi Muller ne likhi hai Ab bol , Ab bol na do sidike Matlab tumko history se koi matlab nahi hai , jo cheez tumhare baare me acha bole , wo tumhari history ho jati hai Kuch toh sharam karo
@@Nothing-yo5uo yes , but also he wants us and world to believe that all that knowledge came from outside india and native Indians weren’t capable of something as wise . Which means only white men had all the wisdom according to them .
@@privilegelearning3316 have you read shiv puran, that you claim, sati was an ancient practice? Arya ka matlan sanskrit me kya hota hai ye pata bhi hai? dravida ka matlab pata hai?
Horse is found that is why it is aaryan invasion....bhai aswmegh yagn kya hai fir? Ye jo mandir hai hazaro saal purane surymandir ko hi dekh le bolde wo bhi aaryan laye the?
@@varunathegreatasura bhai full comedy h aapka comment🤣🤣🤣 Yahi jhooth ki patti to ye gore jinko aap apna purvaj maante ho wo chahte the sab pade aap wahi kar rahe ho goro ke jhooth ko sach maanke bhārat ke asli sach ko thukra rahe ho jo log sach bol rahe hai usse aap bilkul oppose kar rahe ho aap apne vedas ko galat keh rahe ho jo itne saal pehle likhe gaye the jab gore log society culture ka matlab bhi nahi jaante the koi civilisation hi nahi thi Bhārat ke asli sach ko jaanne ki koshish kijiye aapko avashya sab samajh me aa jayega ki hum bhāratiya ek hai dravidian ya aryan jaisi koi human race nahi hoti hai. Dhanyawaad.
@UC-VJg1gGCMHYc-I978Eb15Q Peer reviewed works where other historians go through your works to check the validity of your theories is what qualifies you to be a historian. Anyone can come up with a theory and the gullible viewer who is not from the field will gobble it up.
@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 Claims are based on evidence that you have checked? Don't make me laugh. Believe in your toys and play with them, but don't think others have to play along with you.
Dr. David miano from "world of antiquity" responded to his entire arguments and reasonably critiqued it!!....If views ought to follow the evidence then Abhijit should at least respond to him with a counter-critique
If this people saying that " Indian are origin of USA " coz many people are living there 😅😅 C'mon people travel from one place to another and sometimes settle down. Aryan are born and brought in "Aryavart/Bharat" . Our nation Name was" Aryavart before Bharat" and before rumours of Aryan invasion theory. Wokes story= fake story
Unlike deserted places it's hard to find archeological evidences in Bhaarath as people mostly come and stay here which provides enough population to destroy those evidences. Like, how can you find archeological evidences in Delhi if it has continuous population, evidences are preserved well in deserted areas.
First it's Aryan Invasion "Theory" and what is a theory -> An idea or set of ideas that tries to explain something A theory never becomes a fact. It is an explanation of one or more facts. A well-supported evidence-based theory becomes *acceptable until disproved.* *_It's just a theory given by Europeans which is not proven, but meant to create a sense of guilt in Indians, a divide between regions and a false realisation about European Supremacy_*
as Abhijit Chavda said, they used to called it aryan invasion theory, they aryan migration theory, then now they will call it aryan holiday/ picnic thoery🤣. Abhijit Chavda roasts very hard
@Cezanne it's not my logic it's historical fact. You are blind by hatred and western superiority. Go read about the archeological discoveries of sinhauly, meerut, etc. which predates the supposed Aryan Invasion Dogma. Also the Indian genes are common all over India. There is no genetic divide. But on the other hand there are proofs of migration of Indian genes (R1A) all across the world after the last Ice age.
Yes, Cause these are experts, so they are open to changes. That's how they discover stuffs. and that's how he's different from others like school teachers
That’s what I was thinking. So many filler words it was irritating me…ahhh ahhh ahhh all the time. If he’s struggling with English so much he could’ve just spoke in Hindi.
Horses are very much there in India : Ashwamedha yagya in Ramayana. Horses were mentioned in Mahabharata, Rathi means a warrior on a chariot and it was pulled by Horses. Surya bhagwan's chariot was pulled by 7 horses.
Mahabharata Ramayan are written in Paninini Sanskrit, and Panini lived around Mauryan era . The Sanskrit of Rigveda is different from panini . Also Mahabharata Ramayan mention Greek armies Yavanas and other Central Asian tribes who only show up in India post Alexander’s conquest
@@JT-zl8ypmate have you ever owned a horse? It's not that horse is too sacred for us to let others own it, it's because it's freaki expensive!! If a group has power ofcourse it'll hold the riches to itself it's not because of race it's because of social classes
Just imagin!!! Couple of days back one archaeologist was on abhijits podcast she denied to say or quote about history of egypt and she said about it with discription that i have not studied it but my senior professor had studied egyt and she told me this.....and here the genital man talking about all the language without quoting any reference of scholar or book by SELF.. ....are bhai ye kun hai???? Hai kun ye?
You knw this ranveer chap is actually a soft bollywood....but dnt knw why the great persons like abhijit ji attend his podcast...this ranvir has anti hindu agenda...he is propogating this
sakas came in india 100bce, buddha's perid is 600bce how tf he was a saka ..And he is named shakyamuni because sakas mads him or his principles as their muni or guru thats why he is called shakya muni or teacher of the shakas who teach them dharma
Sinauli mein chariot mila 🤡 it's already debunked in sinauli they found bullock cart not chariot if you closely look for wheel it's full wheel unlike spooked wheeled 🛞 which is used for chariot 😂😂😂 And sinauli cart pretty much matched with harrapan Bullock cart toy so apka WhatsApp University ka gyaan chud Chuka hai 😂😂
@@VortexanimeFXBB Lal, KK mummhad ji or other archeologist jo unn projects mai kaam kyea hai jo wo kudh manne ko naraz hai ki Aryan bahar se aye hai. Bas tum kuch bayl-biddhi abhi bhi bak bak kye ka rahe ho ki haa wo theory sahi hai. Are Indian archeologist to kudh bol raha hai Indian are from ancient Africa that's it. Koi European angle hai e nhi. Or haa please, tum mujhe archeologist (jo sonauli main kaam kya hai unke ) ki video yea written book ki link do jisse yea pata chale ki ha wo chariot nhi bullock cart tha. Wo Harvard main baithe baithe kuch bhi bolne walo ka baat invalid hai, jo ground level pe kaam kar raha hai kya wo bola hai aisa?? Mere hisaab se aisa kuch nhi hua hai.. Pahele librandu ne circulate karwaya ki wo to Adivasis logo ka rath hai ! Jabb baat pe zor na raha to fir bol dia ki wo to bullock cart tha.
The expert didn't talk anything about genetics, which is more solid lead than linguistic or cultural findings. Also, what about the hypothesis that Vedas and Sanskrit were all brought by Aryans. Some even say the Aryans hijacked Dravidian culture/mythology and changed geographic locations to Himalaya , Ganga etc instead of original locations in South
@@Vikram-Agnihotriit would have happened if there would have exist indus people and their ancient city... but unfortunately all of them evacuated due to so and so reason... god knowd what. Else, there would have been a war... there is an archaelogical gap in the history... you can see demographically in the past how england's black- brown population was replaced almost 90% by the Corded ware culture... yamnaya decendants spoked proto indo european language... because both the language and their activity coincides, harappans were nearly peaceful, but the vedic people had a god of war named indra, and a weapon maker named tvashtr... what idea do you get by this... take a look at telgu counting... okati, rendu, mul, nal, ailu, Sanskrit:- Ek, dvai, treiya, chatvaras, pancha Lithuanian :- vienas [1], du [2], trys [3], keturi [4], penki [5], šeši [6], septyni [7], aštuoni [8], and devyni [9] etc... tell me which language is simikar to what?
MY OPINION:- Hm I think there was not any Aryan invasion but there was only migration from parts of Ukraine, Kazakastan and Russia to India but it was also in small amount.. and there was also migration from India to other parts of world too for ex- Iran, china, middle east, etc. But then if some people question that Aryans gives us all this vedic knowledge then i will say no its a complete lie because if people from central Asia gives us Vedic culture then why they forget it.. its like a teacher teaches the student and but then slowly teacher forgot himself what he taught to his students.. so Vedic culture is completely originated from india.. and now if you question about horses then yes we transport them from central asia.. but then you will question about how Ramayan and Mahabharata shows horses, if there was no horses in India before Aryans came then its simple common sense that even in times of Mahabharata and Ramayan we are spread allover the world and have relations with farthest civilizations like Mesopotamia so we can easily get them from central Asia even in that time too and breed them in india.. and this aryan theory was only came because some Britishers does not have the answer that what happened between 1500BCE to 1100BCE that whole Indus Valley Civilization destroyed so they proposed this rubbish Aryan invasion theory and then claim that they gives us all this knowledge we have today.. See from the start Europeans never liked to see anyone above them and its same for india too they does not want to accept that we are far advanced and older civilization then them that's why there is this more reason why they proposed this theory because as Winston Churchill (British pm during 1940s and also a rubbish and cruel person) said that "Indians have missed the bus of industrial revolution or technology".. Now its completely on you whether you believe it or not and sorry if you feel my thinking wrong or hated..
I love the peeled it for Ranveer. He is so disingenuous. He changes his narrative with every guest who speaks on Aryan invasion theory. We don’t suffer from Brain fog Ranveer!!!
I think you should've made him talk a bit more without interrupting, coz when he directs his conversation towards a way, and viewer like me looking for his next sentence, you interrupt. I think as a lover of discussions and debates, you should know where the guest or speaker is directing his conversations too, and respond accordingly, not simply asking questions from the familiar things he mentions upon way of going somewhere. Hope you get it, rest all its a wonderful session. And I felt you should mention his name on the title. Much respect to history and to you both. Thanks.
What about Out of India theory ? What about entire "Sanskriti" that originated in India , connected to Sanskrit - Dance, multiple languages , Musci , grammar, math etc How can it all come from outside and no Sanskriti exist outside in Europe for e.g. ? This speaker is spouting an old theory, Malayalam, Telugu , Kannada - Dravidian languages are so closely related to Sanskrit.
Aryan came here and they develop everything here....after coming to India nobody ever return and did not bring any culture belief or anything to europe back....."aaryans" invaded/travel India only with TATTU which they themself found.......in 1970-80....and with that TATTU they denied the thousand of years old civilization and few leftover KHACCHAR still belives it.....
They say Indo-European are close/marching but if we look into our All Indian languages and there grammer structure, you will find that all are having same grammar pattern and pronunciation, eg: Sawr and Vnajen , the writing pattern my differ but the pronounciation is the same. And even most of the words are same to Sanskrit. Yes my friend South Indian languages are more close to Sanskrit.
Sanskrit is indian in origin. The theory only states that it comes from a family of languages which have common origin with european languages, not that it was made in europe. Dravidian languages are similar to sanskrit due to acculturisation. Proto tamil was the language of the original dravidians which was mixed with sanskrit to get the modern dravidian languages. I still dont understand why it is so hard for people to comprehend that migrations happened to india in the past.
@@Diavol0Krimson Completely agree with you except your usage of the term proto-*tamil --- it would be more historical to use the term proto-*Dravidian seen as the inference to best- explanation resulting from the fact that the yet undeciphered Harappan langauge bears most linguistic *closeness to the speculated proto-dravidian which has many other South Indian, few central indian tribal and few baluchi tribal languages as it's main descendants.
So many people in the comments section are in complete shock and denial that this scholar is able to validate with facts that the aryans originated outside the Indian subcontinent. So what if they did or didn't? All humans emerged from somewhere in Africa anyway. We all came elsewhere.
For your kind info whole Vedas is full of west ward migration of Indian vedic clans Srbinda described migrated to west ( srbinda is ancient term for Serbs /srbenda) Dasa were were shown thrown out of India ( current day their desendant known as daha people , found in Turkmenistan region)
Dasarajan yudha ( civil war of Aryans ) show whole split of main jana ( clans) of Aryans from Punjab those who outcasted made out their own Aryan culture in west ( aka indo Iranic)
@GREATER INDIA yeah OK even if true does it really matter when the entire human race originated from the tip of Africa as evidence indicates? That's the point I'm making.
It’s nice to see non Dravidian speakers feeling sooooo insecure that they want to disprove him so badly. What’s wrong in Indus Valley language being a Dravidian language isn’t it an Indian language. It’s good to first go through what research he has done and cross verify with his reference. Simply blabbering nonsense here won’t make sense. Don’t worry Dravidians won’t tell you to go back where you came from😅.
All mentions of Aryans from Sangam literature refers to the people who inhabited the region of Aryavarta after Vedic times. Another song here, by Pāvai Kottilār, Marutham Thinai - What one concubine said about other jealous concubines Akanānūru 336: Translation: If I go there, I will control him like the sun’s rays that control the direction of nerunchi flowers. If I don’t do that, may the large bangles on my perfect forearms break like the Aryan forces that were destroyed by the brave Chōla warriors with victorious spears and shields as dark as the rain clouds, who darted arrows from their fort in Vallam town, situated behind a protective forest
@@blade3625 yes I am tamilian, but disgusted by the black magic surrounding tamil nadu right now. Fake social justices fake verses fake propaganda, just show the quote from sangam literature right now or else you accept that you are all brainwashed
Poem is correct... but are you sure that the aryans that were mentioned in the poem are the brahmins ? Why because there are many brahmins/paarpanargal/ andhanargal who have contributed to the sangam literature like manulanar, tholkapiyar etc.
@@dkb10101 So andhanar, parpanar, Brahmins are they same or different? Kabilar was a andhanar who are variety of meat, also friend of Paari. Why none of the north Indian Brahmins were in 63 nayanmars of lord Shiva? All these nayanmars of lord Shiva spoke sanskrit or Tamil? Ask these questions to yourself and find the answers.
@@adityaraj2447 Saraswati river evidence starts from 172000+ BCE years ago flowing near Bikaner region then 70000+ BCE years ago Saraswati shifts to Kalibangan region. Around 50000+BCE to 40000BCE Yamuna separated from Saraswati and joined Ganga river. Saraswati was still a grand river till 22000+ BCE (around 8km wide). In 13000 BCE Shatudri(now Sutlej) also separated from Saraswati and shifted westward to meet Sindhu(Indus), the Grand Saraswati river mentioned in Rigveda had already started shrinking. From 7000BCE to 4500BCE there was intensification of monsoon and after 4500BCE saraswati river started shrinking rapidly and by 2000BCE saraswati river was completely gone. Mahabharat has descriptions of saraswati flowing and going under the sand in some places, it's not a grand river anymore as saraswati had already started shrinking since 22000 BCE following separation of Shatudri in 13000 BCE.
is there any similarities between tamil and brahui really?here a video went viral when afganisthan was taken over by taliban a talibani was praying in a language which is much similiar to malayalam language(a dravidian language)
There are lot of similar words between brahui & Tamil_ Malylam.. (1)You - Ne (Brahui), Ne (Tamil, Malayalam) (2)Come - Baa (Brahui), Vaa (Tamil, Malayalam) (3)Snore - Khurkao (Brahui), Khurtai (Tamil) (4)Eye - Xan (Brahui), Kan (Tamil) (5)Stone - Xal (Brahui), Kal (Tamil) (6)Milk - Pal (Brahui), Pal (Tamil) (7)News - Haval (Brahui), Thahaval (Tamil)
brahui people are not native of that location .. they migrated from costal karnataka mahrastra gujrat to the present day balochistan much later than ivc civilization (mostly only 1400 yrs ago)
Correct explanation, not like other Hindu guests who just supported Hinduism even though I am Hindu Andaman Nicobar tribes who are untouched are the people who migrated from Africa to India, Dravidians are the real Indian later mixed with outsiders and formed complex and mixed religion which is modern Hinduism that's why we have diversity in gods, culture, language, foods etc.
Tell me clarify first thing that Arya invasion theory and arya migration theory is different. So there is evidence that harappan civilization is purely destroyed by aryan invasion is not true . But Aryan migration theory is true and vedic culture is different from Harappan civilization because of following reasons- 1. Harappan civilisation was urban civilisation with many urban centres. Agriculture and trade was dominant. They have script. They made houses with The houses of that time were made of baked bricks. Whereas Vedic culture was rural culture. They didnt have scripts (lipi), which is the best explanation that vedic culture and harappan civilization is different. They were pastoral primarly. They live in mud houses. And harappan language was not associated with sanskrit . So by this it is proved that vedic culture is not harappan culture and vedic culture started after the decline of harappan civilization. They bring sanskrit with them.
Myths regarding Aryan Migration Theory (Read full):- 1. "NORTH INDIANS ARE FOREIGNERS AND SOUTH INDIANS ARE NATIVE":- Actually Mainland Indians are descended from 3 groups:- Steppe Pastoralists ("Aryan"), Zagrosian Neolithic Farmers , and the first Group that arrived in India 'AASI'. Only difference is North Indians generally have higher proportions of Aryan genes than South Indians. 2. "THIS WESTERN CONSPIRACY WANTS TO IMPLY ARYANS BROUGHT SANSKRIT AND VEDA TO INDIA" Sanskrit, in its Vedic form was developed in India. Vedas were also developed in India. They formed after Aryan already came to India 3. "ARYAN DESTROYED INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION" Indus Valley civilization's collapse may have to do with Floods or drought (most probable). Aryans migrated to India towards IVC's end. 4. "HINDUISM IS OUTSIDE RELIGION" or "HINDUISM IS NATIVE RELIGION". Aspect of Hinduism (which itself is a combination of different faiths, beliefs, tradition and to an extent philosophies) derive from many different practices. Folk elements of hinduism are derived from. Local folk religion. Many of the rigvedic deities are descended of gods in proto indo European gods such as Agni, Varuna. Some may have derived from IVC gods but we aren't sure. Some may have also been borrowed from BMAC. 5. "AMT IS WESTERN PROPOGANDA TO IMPLY EUROPEANS CAME TO INDIA TO CIVILIZE IT" Saying Aryans are central asian or European is pathetic. Modern European themselves are descended from 3 groups:- Steppe Pastoralists, Early European Farmers (also called Anatolian Neolithic Farmers) and Western Hunter Gatherers. Indo Europeans migrated to two direct:- West to Europe and (East to central Asia and eventually South to Iran and indian subcontinent) So I have 2 more things to say 1. To South Indians:- Do not have the notation that you are native and North Indians (sp. Brahmins) are invaders. Simple genetic ancestry reveals that most Indians have not AASI or Aryan but Zagrosian Neolithic Farmer (who are from iran) component in plurality. Even you have Aryan genes to an extent. And do not believe in racial theories of Caucasoid or mongoloid etc 2. To North Indians:- You are not invaders. Migration is common throughout human history as there was no borders back then. Significant ancestors were from steppes is nothing to feel bad for. For everyone eventually migrated out of sub Saharan Africa.
I am not at all surprised to see one sided blindness of the guest who completely turns a blind eye towards the Indic Evidence and propogates Aryan Invasion theory, Theory of Nataural Selection by Darwin as opposed to out of India (i.e Bharat ) theory and so on. The speaker acknowledges the good work of British in discovering our history, however doesn't criticise British for distortion of Indian History. The speaker is highly opinionated in some aspects. He is a Indian by body and British by mind. Distortion of History has continued in India i.e Bharat after partition of Bharat, thanks to duo of Nehru- Gandhi and Nehru's ties with leftists, marksist and Islamist people , who didn't have any honesty in telling the right history and no love for Bharat Mata. The anchor also changed colours as per the speaker. There were no counter questions asked. On the contrary there were agreements on all issues.
Inke hisab se to ghode the hi nahi to bhai hamare dharm me asva khaa se aaya aur ye chodo ashwagandha kaha se aya ayur vea me ... Mujhe pata hai modern theory ne laaaya 🤣😂😂😂
8:23 he says cities disappeared suggesting there was invasion but he knows very well there is no evidence of battles. And also we know today why they could have abandoned the cities which is due to climate change, drying up of rivers etc
Ya , it can not be invasion because aryan migration happened in packet of wave and not in bunch. But Local fight did happened. No War does not means no possiblity of fights.
An Arab says to an Aryan, Hey boy, come hug me, the Aryan says why the Arab says you are my son, the Mongol says my son, don't believe what he says, I am your real father, the Greek says who said I am his real father, the Aryan says wow, I didn't know how many fathers I have 😂😂🤣🤣 Aryan is not real
Where do you think Indus Valley people vanished? Why do you find pockets of Dravidians all over India? Indus Valley is not dead; it's alive in the souls of Dravidians... Why Tamils dislike Hindi? Its a story that will unfold over time! Does anyone know there are Tamil speaking people in Pakistan?
this is completely wrong. abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda .
Well Bhim betka cave paintings which dated back to 8000-1000 bce shows there were horses in India . And in Indus valley civilization a horse shaped toy and some bones of horses were founded.
@@stardust2045 this is completely wrong. abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda .
@@theybecameus Abhijit Chavda have been debunked many times by actual historian and geneticist from all over the world. And Sanjay Dixit is a liar because David Reich who's the lead geneticist from Harvard University of Rakhigarhi DNA believe in Aryan migration. If the lead geneticist of Rakhigarhi study agree with Aryan migration,why are Indians who work under him in denial?
@@theybecameus they will run from a true statement genetic throughout Indian and archeological evidence and make a conspiracy theory as always do 😂😂 your abhijit chavda and Dixit doesn't about history they doesn't even know what are sources they are basically conspiracy theorist like flat earther 😂😂
Indian subcontinent is upon multiple seismic plates, hence catastrophic earthquakes is surely a possibility, which could have destroyed structures. Another theory that comes to my mind, India is uniquely positioned as the longest and continuous civilization. Hence the pre historic buildings could have been broken down to build modern ones. Another fact that we should not overlook, is the Islamic invasion in the northern Indian region, where most of the civilization was based, Indus, saraswati, gangetic plains. These marauders definitely destroyed many such buildings and historical places.
India is on a single Tectonic plate. And there have been no volcanoes for lakhs of years. Nothing catastrophic happened. Just that Archeologist only manage to find things in dry areas, while Human being live in opposite kind of places. Also these hypocrites, contradict their own theories. Which is, origin of any gene or lang should be at the region which has maximum derived variants of it. And India happens to have maximum derived languages of Sanskrit, India has has maximum derived genes of "R1", India has maximum derived gene of "F"... So every standard history method. supports India to be source of origin of everything. But these people consider IndoIranian as originators.
@@riscnx I agree that India is on a single tectonic plate. However your point that there has been no volcanoes here needs to be relooked at. The whole region of Chota Nagpur has Black soil and as far as my knowledge goes, black soil is a result of volcanic activity. The whole northern region experiences earthquakes till to this day, since the Indian plate collided with the eurasian plate. This seismic activity has been going on for millennia. So my point that the indus - saraswati river (as geologist and archaeologists say) was the main region of the civilisational growth, whence the region experienced subsequent earthquakes, the topography changed making the glacier fed river of saraswati either change course or dry out completely. The story of saraswati river should not be dismissed as fiction, since our vedas do mention the 3 rivers of Ganga, Jamuna and Saraswati.
@@jimbocho660 so you mean to say that the sites found in Rakhigarhi, lothal, kalibangan and other related sites are not a part of the indus valley civilisation? Or if any earthquake hitting the region of punjab or Haryana in India would magically not have altered the geography of the areas around these sites which transformed the elevation and other geological factors to have caused the shifting of rivers and changes in climate? Your understanding of the Indus Valley civilisation is very narrow. Please read again, or at best please don’t comment on someone who is a historian.
@@ronitrajput3934 Bhai, physics ka theory aur history ke theory mae koi fark hai ki nahi??? Aryan invasion theory ke evidence probability pe based hai and Big bang theory ke evidence matlab infrared radiation background abhi bhi ham dekh saktey hai. History ke theory ko sabse ke sath gholmol mat karo please, Aryan invasion theory ke proper evidence dene ke liye kafi time mila in historians ko lekin abhi bhi inke pas ek proper evidence nahi hai. Abhi bhi random words ko milake bas theory ko reinforce karne ki koshish kartey hai. Achha tu bata, tu convince ho gaya iske bato se, ki aryan invasion sach mae hua tha??
Correct explanation, not like other Hindu guests who just supported Hinduism even though I am Hindu Andaman Nicobar tribes who are untouched are the people who migrated from Africa to India, Dravidians are the real Indian later mixed with outsiders and formed complex and mixed religion which is modern Hinduism that's why we have diversity in gods, culture, language, foods etc.
I don’t like his perspective. I feel something is missing this logic. I don’t exactly look at the Mahabharat as an epic or mythology or religious scripture but like a history. And there are extensive information of horses and chariots. It’s basically convenience for someone to see the evidences of Mahabharata but ignoring it and not taking it as benchmark.
Iam not trying to disrespect your beliefs But mahabharata is a tough pill to swallow as "history" You can believe whatever you want But for me personally, i would rather take it as a story that teaches valuable lessons than as "history" I mean, mahabharata speaks of demons demigods and gods, snake people and immortals I just don't understand how someone can believe it as history
@@adith9327 asi is currently searching for these fictional cities in gulf of khambat. You should probably address an email to both ASI and GoI to stop wasting time and money
this is completely wrong. abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda .
1:31 ranveer its not in malayalam. Malayalam itself got the phonetic from Tamil its called Zhagaram. The language name itself ends with it "Tamizh". Wish I could add audio here to help you pronounce it.
Yes though I'm not tamillian but it's an imp fact that people must know when they spell Tamil/tamizh while producing la sound tounge should be suspended in air and not to be touched to the roof of mouth or whateve you call it. It's so hard to try explaining without audio but this version of la doesn't exist in Sanskrit or many languages however there are many ancient texts that are written in Sanskrit and are available to few locals only who have stored then through generations do have such versions of la which in modern times written as zh to represent in English by tamillians. However Sanskrit grammer doesn't include this but certain texts from Kashmir and Goa do refer such sounds as bandhakshar i.e. The sounds that appear between two sound like zh version of la is an outcome of two other versions of la like while pronouncing one la is touching tip of tounge to the taali and tounge is to be touching the front part of mouth that is just behind your teeth(roof of mouth) and other versions is to touch the tip of tongue to taali (roof of mouth) at the back as we spell ळ in Marathi. And the la that we represent with zh is an average version of both sound that is by suspending toungue in middle. But nowadays this system is lost in even Sanskrit as this grammer is not known except for few locals around india
@@nagrajgovekar6305 you ate roght dude. Pronouncing Zh is just like pronouncing "la" except the tip of the tongue is pulled a bit backwards to the center of the mouth and a slight gap between the tip of the tongue and the roof of the mouth at the center of your mouth. P. S- it is called the roof of the mouth so you are correct! 😉
abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda . tell about this challenge to everyone. to accept challenge, contact jaipur dialogues youtube channel
This is a very western Outlook of Indian history. Aryan invasion theory has been debunked too many times. Let's start analysing Indian history from Indian perspective
Wouldn't an Indian perspective be "Once upon a time foreigners came in chariots, enforced a caste system on us lasting thousands of years and then made us believe we all came from the same place all along to preserve legitimacy"?
@@NoneOfYourBusiness-nv5cv We are both speaking english, not Indian. Whether "caste" is an Indian word doesn't remove the fact that Indian has been ruled with Castes for literal thousands of years. THAT is a fact, no? It didn't have to be, but that is what the Aryan invasion did to you.
13:08 On this auspicious ocassion of Ratha Saptami (literally means Chariot of Lord Sun(Surya Deva) driven by Seven horses), i'd like to draw ur attention to our history, about existence of chariot in India before colonisers acclaimed time, Its been mentioned in Mahabharata, Ramanayana and so on.Its in our Scripture. And if u want Physical Evidence, Ever visited Konark Sun temple? We built a freaking temple that resembles it. Must Applaud Ranveer's patience and professionalism at this point. Being soo well read, he could've debunked his theory in sec. but he gave the other person a chance.
he Konark Sun Temple was built in 1250 CE during the reign of the Eastern Ganga King Narsimhadeva-1 from stone in the form of a giant ornamented chariot dedicated to the Sun god, Surya.
@@Swagnik-g8h that was a rhetorical question to point out if Konark temple has a chariot dedicated to Sun god in 1250 CE that doesn't prove existence of Horses/Chariots in 2000 BCE.
This guy is either ignorant or is trying to dumb down things for ignorant Indians. 3:13 Ashurbanipal is a Semitic, not an Indo-European name. The ancient Assyrian language is Semitic. Hittite, Mittani and Kassite are Indo-European, he should have picked Tushratta of the Mittani or the deities Tarhunnaz and Inara of the Hittites as examples of ancient Indo-Europeans in Anatolia and the Levant.
After watching this episode on indian history, i thought, every speaker is inclined towards a perticular agenda, they present the facts according to their believes and perspectives. Horses are not native of indian subcontinent, totally screwed up my mind ( some experts present the archioligical evidence like fossils , ashvmegh ygya and donation of horses in indian puraan and all).
Yes man. You also have agendas and biases. The aryan migration theory might be false I dont know, but it take care of all this. Horses came after aryans migrated and vedas were also written after that. So they were not native to India.
Feel so sad for those who still believe in bramhinical history and thinks ramayana and mahabharata are real events.. Either they don't understand anything related science or just an emotion bound child who refuses to leave bonding with fairytale characters.
Europe is much more colder, so may even more that 10,000 years before definitely initial migration must have happened from Africa to India and thn afterwards from somewhere in between from that root to Europe and Central Asia...afterwards revers migration may also have happen as it's very very cold near Europe.
Short and simple when there was no Aryan invasion theory before British Rule but after during British rule created Aryan invasion theory for just to divide India based on their cast and 2nd things there are nothing mentioned Aryans and dravidians in our Hindu scriptures also.
What an interview ,an unbiased inner view, amazing openness, brilliant perspective. Sanskrit is definitely from AfPak area adjoining Iran. Stunned by the man's integrity. Kudos to you,let us look into all areas of convergence.
Irfan Habib... You got a successor. Man his attitude, the way he lies and propagates the " British founded and invented everything, Aryans comes from turkey " . He have all qualities to to become next Irfan Habib 😜😜😂😂
Humble request to all North Indian Hindu brothers. Please keep an open mind. We are here to uncover the truth. This is for knowledge and nothing changes if Aryan migration/invasion is proved to be true. Nobody is going to hold you responsible for Aryan invasion/migration. So chill.
One another dark side on Gandhi invention is “Buniyadi Sikaha/Nayi Talim/Basic education “. Educational trusts are taking advantage of buniyadi rule for child labour
He was partly right. Sanskrit is not from india likewise it’s not from Syria as well. It’s somewhere from Russia. You can find many similarities in Russia n Sanskrit.
@@abhinavgokhale6917 ye le Russia mein oldest source hai to hisab sankrit ka script hai devangiri Jo 9 century ad mein bani 😂 aur india mein oldest source bas prakrit hai
There is NO evidence of a proto Indo European language, neither of many statements he made. Like the place where these supposed proto Indo Europeans lived, that they were advanced enough to build chariots, etc. These are ALL theories and speculations as well, NO evidence exists for their support. Also, we would have remembered Ashok, and maybe even Indus civilization if our libraries and culture were not burned down by outside invaders. Also, the statement he made about horses and chariots has been disproven when a chariot, the OLDEST in the world was found in Sinauli.
@ganeshtadigadapa1057 it's a pity that u don't know the source of your info. Indian history textbooks were copied from Max Muller's(a British bureaucrat) writings.
@raistar007 caste system was there but it was much more complex and based on the work done by an individual. The Britishers over simplified and brought the extremism in it.
Till how long will you deny the fact that around 4,500 years Sarasvati river dried up completely and around that same time we find mass graves in Western Europe of their indigenous people. Which is described as a population and genetic change event in the European continent…
And as far as Tamil languages found in Pakistan Sindh was ruled by Tamil rulers as they dominated the navy during that time. And they were the ones who transported spices etc to that part directly through sea route.
Buslins, Chims, Mibrels, Beftist can believe whatever they want about Aryan “tourism” theory. The truth is aj bhi pandit koi bhi puja se pehle sankalp ke samay bolta hai-Jamboodweepe Aryavarte Bhartavrashe with current of date in millions of years and gotra. This is the ultimate proof for me.
Why there is big towns and golden towns of our epics like Mahabharat, Ramayana never found, not any single evidence, When ever the ASI digs always they found Buddha. The oldest manuscript of Rigveda which is found in 14 th century ( 1464 AD ) in Vedic age all of Vedic books are written so there is no evidence from that time.
what are your sources... books that you read... evidences provided by British meh 😒 I need more 🤷🏽♀️ if only 10% have been dug in india how can you confirm this theory 🤔
yeah bro. this is completely wrong. abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda . this is utter clown world 🤣
this is completely wrong. abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda .
Whether he is right or wrong does this theory matter now? We all are Indians, even if we don't have an Indian race, we Indians were always united, we've so many different culture & languages. Don't take too much pride or disgust for what ever happened in the past.
@ARYAN MIZDHA abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda . tell about this challenge to everyone. to accept challenge, contact jaipur dialogues youtube channel
17 mins of him talking and I latched on to nothing just blatant speculation and no quotation or references. He is a historian and names 2 species of humans ..." Homo sapiens, Neanderthals etc.." this was enough for me to understand what background research he is coming from.
6:16 While a post Ice-Age out of India movement did happen, but that is largely of maternal haplogroups, and it is well known that Steppe ancestry is passed down paternally and according to the findings of Reich, Narsimhan etc this entered the subcontinent and Western Europe around 4000 years ago, and in Spain resulted in the annihilation of pre-existing males. So the immediate post Ice-Age movement has no relevance to Indo-European languages.
One of the primary obligations we have when examining history is to scrutinize the information presented with a critical mindset. It's all too common for historical accounts to contain inconsistencies, prejudices, and outright inaccuracies - and it's our duty as inquisitive learners to recognize these discrepancies and strive for the truth. An instance of this can be observed when discussing the origins of the so-called "Aryan race." A glaring contradiction persists regarding this topic. Specifically, concerning those who claimed to follow the principles of Adolf Hitler: On one hand, they assert that he advocated a racially motivated ideology and believed that “Aryan” Nordic people had entered India from the north approximately 1,500 years prior. He also posited that these Aryans committed the “crime” of intermingling with local “un-Aryan” populations, thereby losing the traits that made them genetically superior to all other human beings. However, this assertion lacks concrete evidence, devoid of substantiating documents from German government archives, verbal testimonies, or written records. It appears based on hearsay or fabricated stories propagated by individuals without factual backing. Moreover, I must emphasize another blatant inconsistency in these historians' claims: they assert that "Germans covertly arrived along India's eastern borders" to "uncover the 'source of origin of the Aryan race.'" The issue here is apparent - if Aryans indeed entered from the north, their "origin of source" would already be known, rendering the Germans' purported mission to discover it nonsensical. These two assertions directly contradict each other, and this glaring inconsistency should serve as a red flag prompting us to delve deeper. When we encounter such conspicuous logical flaws in historical accounts, it's a clear indication that the information provided may be unreliable, prejudiced, or even deliberately misleading.
Sanskrit language, (from Sanskrit saṃskṛta, “adorned, cultivated, purified”), an Old Indo-Aryan language in which the most ancient documents are the Vedas, composed in what is called Vedic Sanskrit. Although Vedic documents represent the dialects then found in the northern midlands of the Indian subcontinent and areas immediately east thereof, the very earliest texts-including the Rigveda (“The Veda Composed in Verses”), which scholars generally ascribe to approximately 1500 BCE-stem from the northwestern part of the subcontinent, the area of the ancient seven rivers (sapta sindhavaḥ). Source:Brittanica: most trusted dictionary and encyclopaedia Sanskrit's first evidence was not found in syria, his madarsa education is nothing more than misinformation and propaganda.
I am not sure about the other things, but we definitely knew about Ashoka. There is a stupa in mantralayam in andhrapradesh which was said to be planted by Ashoka during his expansion period. People have been going there and knew it as ashoka stupa way before, the british.
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
Link to our blog - beerbiceps.com/islam-christianity-hinduism-more/
In my South India ..... Karnataka Kerala Telangana ap .. fair to brown yellowish skin hai ....aur straight hair bhi hai... Sharp facial structure ....but malayali Have curly hair .... With fair skin Sharp facial structure .... Tamilnadu people are dark skin
One point:
Horses may not be native to India but horses existed in India.
If horses didn't exist in India, how do we explain cave paintings of Bhimbetka in Madhya Pradesh which depict the horse riding people?
Bhimbetka paintings are 10,000 years old.
YOu use the term evidence -but without full evidence and influenced evidence you cannot know the truth-unless you get out of the mindset that only evidence is what is seen now and past evidence though not suited to our appreciation of seeing is believing and past write ups and evidence on temples are rubbish-you are bias and people pleasing-not searching or accepting of the truth-there is evidence suggesting a very good possibility rubbishing the Aryan invasion theory. And yet we want to believe non scientific methods and call it science or prove as close as rubbish concept. So not impressed. I thought your channel was to search for the truth not just listen to old forced colonial known theories forced on us. By your and his theory that science is correct because Universities teach sot the what about the false and modified teachings in US about their own religion full of violence and them modifying our stuff-how is that correct and scientific-because it is the west? Why despite evidence correction of rubbish theories unacceptable or rubbished?
When no one in India was interested in history, when Brahmins had forgotten meaning of Sanskrit shlokas, its the foreign historians who discovered and praised IVC, deciphered Brahmi script, made Sanskrit/Buddhism/Yoga/Indian Temple architecture popular. Our ruling party blindly loves it when narrative fits their agenda, but claims as European conspiracy when it doesn't. Hypocrisy ki bhi seema hoti hai.
There is plenty of new scientific evidence from last few decades to prove AMT. However there is no use sharing it as these folks won't accept it. The whole world can see that this is a narcissistic bipolar attitude and they harbor a deep inferiority feeling stemming from a hurt pride. Feel sorry for them. A civilization doesn't have to be the oldest to be respected. Else there would have been no respect for Roman history. I am still proud of our ancient culture and Arya Maryada Purushottam Ram is my role model.
First chariot was found in India during a archeologic dig in Sanauli which has been dated back to 4000 years or more !! So idk how he reached to the conclusion of India not having horses but had chariots dating back that old is beyond my understanding and the Aryan Invasion myth has been busted way too many times now. Why keep bringing it back again and again ?
Bang on
DNA & linguistic evidence point to the arrival of Aryans.
What can you expect from madarasachap propagandists
He said it right indian climate and weather is such nothing good grows here..that's why i am migrating to canada
The sanauli chariot was a bullock cart. It didnt have spoked wheels. Spoked wheels are what gives a war chariot it's mobility. As of now there have been no historical discoveries which prove that aryan migration didnt happen. Now if you bring up rakhigarhi excavation, the DNA from that specimen too confirms it did was ASI dna, which also confirms the theory.
Recently done Sinauli excavations.....resulted in discovery of Chariots and weapons of Mahabharata period.....it raises questions on validity of Aryan or Indo European invasion theories.....
How many chariots and horses were found in europe ? If digging horses are the only base then dragon skeleton found in africa or america...so they should claim that chinese people were invaded by african or american cuz they belive in dragon and that belief was bring by african or american from africa or america to china before chinese civilization?
@@prb392 are you on meth bro???
@@prb392 please tell me which powder are you on i want to get high too..
@@harshtarare7712 i read quran and hadiths and history inaddition to get mad.....you should try it too.....recommended
@@harshtarare7712 i have told you what i am on brah!!!!
Horses have been mentioned in ancient indian scriptures that are thousands of years old. Ramayana: Ashwamegh yagya. Mahabharata: Krishna was a charioteer for Arjuna. I'd love if Ranveer can invite an expert like Nilesh Nilkanth Oak to shed some light on the topic. Counter view is crucial on such matters.
In Dravidian texts or Sanskrit? Because Sanskrit didn’t originate in India. So it makes perfect sense that it would be mentioned in Sanskrit.
You cannot possibly prove that it is thousands of years old. We believe it to be but we need more evidence
Ramayana and mahabharata are layered texts. Many new passages were added to it over time. Original Events around which the whole stories are added are thought to have occurred around 1300-900bc. Nilesh Oak's work is astrological based not scientific, You can check david maino's critic video of how he has arrived at those dates.
@@leoalphaproductions8642 sanskrit originated in India buddy
@@rudrakshsingh5270 false. Completely false.
pov : you already know the answer because you're fan of abhijit chavda sir
Yessss
What answer?
Not fan but he gave true sources
NO. We know the answer because we have logical proof..
@@Vishakha_B897 ya abhijit sir always gives logical explanations and proofs
Yeah yeah
Hindi script is non- Aryan but Turkish Lungi launguage is pure Sanskrit Aryan launguage 😂😂
Classic lie meddling by commie historians i call them sharia bolshevicks
Mf
Stupid Pani puri 🤣🤣
The speakers of that "Turkish Lungi Language" Since controlled much if the known world. So shut your trap.
Savage 😂
Our Indian society is more like 2 sides of a coin! We are so curious to know about the origin of our ethnicity and yet leave no possibility to judge ourselves based on surnames and categories.🤨😐
What has origin to do it, knowing someone with surname?
You see, we are not savages or hippies, we carry the values of our ancestors at least for a few generation.
I guess human has always been curious also nothing is perfect and everything does have loopholes including human psychology so though people are getting more and more educated but still they wanna know their origin and thays alright. Now thats upto them how they digest it but in my opinion its gonna be fine because of the open mindness and the fact that every life matters.
Don't go on language and Genetics because genetic always evolve it will change some 10k to 20k y and language always spreds you will never get Reality only way to find the truth go on Culture because Cultures are made according weather and Geography this is why India has too much diversity East,west, South,North everywhere Culture little bitt different because india has different Weather in every 200km,and go back to 8000 to 7000y back there is sign any Tribe only developed Civilization there is not a single Ancient Civilization was Advance that India did migretion only happened out of india not inside india.
Name one society in world not categorised based on class or caste.
Watch Abhijit chavda sir for detailed explaination of This false theory which was written by Muller who didnt come to India.
Mughals were Indians and Indians are central Europeans😂😂😂
People from some communities never fail to dissapoint when it comes to showing Their hidden hatred for Bharatiya civilization.
Maine Muller ko padha uske dil me india ke liye boht respect hai vo india real home of knowledge mata tha to aisa kyu kahega?
Har cheez jo tumhe pasand nhi wo Muller ne likhi ,
Wa bhai waa
Taliya bajao inke liye , nakhuno se
Beta , Muller ko toh chhod hi do
Mahabharata me bhi Aryans ka mention milta hai
Ab bol ki Mahabharata bhi Muller ne likhi hai
Wo abhijeet , jisko kuch nhi pata Indian history ke baare me
Bass fan favourite banne ke liye kuch bhi bolta rehta hai
He said that sati was introduced by Britishers to divide and rule stuff
But sati was a very old practice , and we can find it's proofs in shiv puran as well
Ab bol ki shiv puran bhi Muller ne likhi hai
Ab bol ,
Ab bol na do sidike
Matlab tumko history se koi matlab nahi hai , jo cheez tumhare baare me acha bole , wo tumhari history ho jati hai
Kuch toh sharam karo
@@Nothing-yo5uo yes , but also he wants us and world to believe that all that knowledge came from outside india and native Indians weren’t capable of something as wise . Which means only white men had all the wisdom according to them .
@@preethishetty6179 which is true
@@privilegelearning3316 have you read shiv puran, that you claim, sati was an ancient practice? Arya ka matlan sanskrit me kya hota hai ye pata bhi hai? dravida ka matlab pata hai?
Horse is found that is why it is aaryan invasion....bhai aswmegh yagn kya hai fir? Ye jo mandir hai hazaro saal purane surymandir ko hi dekh le bolde wo bhi aaryan laye the?
😂 tik kaha mandir ek bhi nahi hai west me per inhe Sanskrit apna kehana hai 😂
Bhai ye purana brainwashed professor hai, jo goro ne jag diya wo ye chupchap kha letey, inka khud ka field research "sannata" hai.
I was about to comment this only
@@devilback8871 mostly these buggers and commie historians want to prove western supremacy over Hinduism. Bloody communist buggers.
@@varunathegreatasura bhai full comedy h aapka comment🤣🤣🤣
Yahi jhooth ki patti to ye gore jinko aap apna purvaj maante ho wo chahte the sab pade aap wahi kar rahe ho goro ke jhooth ko sach maanke bhārat ke asli sach ko thukra rahe ho jo log sach bol rahe hai usse aap bilkul oppose kar rahe ho aap apne vedas ko galat keh rahe ho jo itne saal pehle likhe gaye the jab gore log society culture ka matlab bhi nahi jaante the koi civilisation hi nahi thi
Bhārat ke asli sach ko jaanne ki koshish kijiye aapko avashya sab samajh me aa jayega ki hum bhāratiya ek hai dravidian ya aryan jaisi koi human race nahi hoti hai. Dhanyawaad.
somewhere it feels like this man is beating around the bush
I think he had burping problem, lmao xD
He is not at all addressing the question. Just talking everything else
Because the british came with the “invasion” part. I can say anything about the past. Proving it right or wrong is both hard lol.
If only abhijit sir roasted videos, he would've absolutely demolished this guy.
Seriously I hope he does😂
Abhijit Chavda is not a historian. This guy is. There's a reason why conspiracy historians stay away from academia members.
@UC-VJg1gGCMHYc-I978Eb15Q Peer reviewed works where other historians go through your works to check the validity of your theories is what qualifies you to be a historian. Anyone can come up with a theory and the gullible viewer who is not from the field will gobble it up.
@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 Claims are based on evidence that you have checked? Don't make me laugh. Believe in your toys and play with them, but don't think others have to play along with you.
Dr. David miano from "world of antiquity" responded to his entire arguments and reasonably critiqued it!!....If views ought to follow the evidence then Abhijit should at least respond to him with a counter-critique
If this people saying that " Indian are origin of USA " coz many people are living there 😅😅
C'mon people travel from one place to another and sometimes settle down. Aryan are born and brought in "Aryavart/Bharat" .
Our nation Name was" Aryavart before Bharat" and before rumours of Aryan invasion theory.
Wokes story= fake story
Big words with no meaning. Felt pity on this guy
?!
True
True
inferiority complex much?
@@mkhan8527 all khans in india Pak big mouth Pak full poor now
Unlike deserted places it's hard to find archeological evidences in Bhaarath as people mostly come and stay here which provides enough population to destroy those evidences.
Like, how can you find archeological evidences in Delhi if it has continuous population, evidences are preserved well in deserted areas.
First it's Aryan Invasion "Theory" and what is a theory ->
An idea or set of ideas that tries to explain something
A theory never becomes a fact. It is an explanation of one or more facts. A well-supported evidence-based theory becomes *acceptable until disproved.*
*_It's just a theory given by Europeans which is not proven, but meant to create a sense of guilt in Indians, a divide between regions and a false realisation about European Supremacy_*
as Abhijit Chavda said, they used to called it aryan invasion theory, they aryan migration theory, then now they will call it aryan holiday/ picnic thoery🤣. Abhijit Chavda roasts very hard
Nailed it brother. 💪
Bro the theory is published by Indians 😂😂😂 do some research before blaming Europeans
@Cezanne it's not my logic it's historical fact. You are blind by hatred and western superiority.
Go read about the archeological discoveries of sinhauly, meerut, etc. which predates the supposed Aryan Invasion Dogma.
Also the Indian genes are common all over India. There is no genetic divide.
But on the other hand there are proofs of migration of Indian genes (R1A) all across the world after the last Ice age.
Aryan invasion happened...its true...north indians have higher steppe ancestry than south indians
This expert himself looks confused about what he's talking.
"EXPERT" Kahan hai yeh kahn seh ate hai!!!
Not really, he seems calm and composed his instead of idiots like Abhijeet Chawla who’s trying hard to come up with arguments when he speaks.
Yes, Cause these are experts, so they are open to changes. That's how they discover stuffs. and that's how he's different from others like school teachers
That’s what I was thinking. So many filler words it was irritating me…ahhh ahhh ahhh all the time. If he’s struggling with English so much he could’ve just spoke in Hindi.
Horses are very much there in India : Ashwamedha yagya in Ramayana. Horses were mentioned in Mahabharata, Rathi means a warrior on a chariot and it was pulled by Horses. Surya bhagwan's chariot was pulled by 7 horses.
Evidences of horses are found in sindhu saraswati civilization in lothal and surkotada sites
d horse as an animal is native to & originted in central asian step area 👍
...
so .. aomeone brought them here , probably d natives of central asia 😂
Mahabharata Ramayan are written in Paninini Sanskrit, and Panini lived around Mauryan era . The Sanskrit of Rigveda is different from panini . Also Mahabharata Ramayan mention Greek armies Yavanas and other Central Asian tribes who only show up in India post Alexander’s conquest
horses were introduced in india by aryans thats why upper caste people didnot allow lower caste people to ride horses
@@JT-zl8ypmate have you ever owned a horse? It's not that horse is too sacred for us to let others own it, it's because it's freaki expensive!! If a group has power ofcourse it'll hold the riches to itself it's not because of race it's because of social classes
Just imagin!!! Couple of days back one archaeologist was on abhijits podcast she denied to say or quote about history of egypt and she said about it with discription that i have not studied it but my senior professor had studied egyt and she told me this.....and here the genital man talking about all the language without quoting any reference of scholar or book by SELF.. ....are bhai ye kun hai???? Hai kun ye?
True!
he is spreading propaganda.............u can understand by his name only, a peaceful!
Madarasachap hai yeah
You knw this ranveer chap is actually a soft bollywood....but dnt knw why the great persons like abhijit ji attend his podcast...this ranvir has anti hindu agenda...he is propogating this
Madd madd lmao everyone originated from somewhere but you guys seem too pressed
We don't have chariot?? Well here in sinauli hold my beer.
Sakya or budha was before scythian i think
sakas came in india 100bce, buddha's perid is 600bce how tf he was a saka ..And he is named shakyamuni because sakas mads him or his principles as their muni or guru thats why he is called shakya muni or teacher of the shakas who teach them dharma
Sinauli are bullock carts, not spoked wheel chariots
Sinauli mein chariot mila 🤡 it's already debunked in sinauli they found bullock cart not chariot if you closely look for wheel it's full wheel unlike spooked wheeled 🛞 which is used for chariot 😂😂😂
And sinauli cart pretty much matched with harrapan Bullock cart toy so apka WhatsApp University ka gyaan chud Chuka hai 😂😂
@@VortexanimeFXBB Lal, KK mummhad ji or other archeologist jo unn projects mai kaam kyea hai jo wo kudh manne ko naraz hai ki Aryan bahar se aye hai.
Bas tum kuch bayl-biddhi abhi bhi bak bak kye ka rahe ho ki haa wo theory sahi hai.
Are Indian archeologist to kudh bol raha hai Indian are from ancient Africa that's it.
Koi European angle hai e nhi.
Or haa please, tum mujhe archeologist (jo sonauli main kaam kya hai unke ) ki video yea written book ki link do jisse yea pata chale ki ha wo chariot nhi bullock cart tha.
Wo Harvard main baithe baithe kuch bhi bolne walo ka baat invalid hai, jo ground level pe kaam kar raha hai kya wo bola hai aisa??
Mere hisaab se aisa kuch nhi hua hai..
Pahele librandu ne circulate karwaya ki wo to Adivasis logo ka rath hai ! Jabb baat pe zor na raha to fir bol dia ki wo to bullock cart tha.
The expert didn't talk anything about genetics, which is more solid lead than linguistic or cultural findings. Also, what about the hypothesis that Vedas and Sanskrit were all brought by Aryans. Some even say the Aryans hijacked Dravidian culture/mythology and changed geographic locations to Himalaya , Ganga etc instead of original locations in South
Exactly ranveer post manipulative content
then why did dravidian kings honor sanskrit. only south indians believe this british bs lol
so basically you're saying that Aryan invasion did happen.
@@Vikram-Agnihotri there's no evidence to support a struggle between Dravidian South Indians and Aryan North Indians. It's literally made up garbage
@@Vikram-Agnihotriit would have happened if there would have exist indus people and their ancient city... but unfortunately all of them evacuated due to so and so reason... god knowd what. Else, there would have been a war... there is an archaelogical gap in the history... you can see demographically in the past how england's black- brown population was replaced almost 90% by the Corded ware culture... yamnaya decendants spoked proto indo european language... because both the language and their activity coincides, harappans were nearly peaceful, but the vedic people had a god of war named indra, and a weapon maker named tvashtr... what idea do you get by this... take a look at telgu counting... okati, rendu, mul, nal, ailu,
Sanskrit:- Ek, dvai, treiya, chatvaras, pancha
Lithuanian :- vienas [1], du [2], trys [3], keturi [4], penki [5], šeši [6], septyni [7], aštuoni [8], and devyni [9] etc... tell me which language is simikar to what?
MY OPINION:-
Hm I think there was not any Aryan invasion but there was only migration from parts of Ukraine, Kazakastan and Russia to India but it was also in small amount.. and there was also migration from India to other parts of world too for ex- Iran, china, middle east, etc. But then if some people question that Aryans gives us all this vedic knowledge then i will say no its a complete lie because if people from central Asia gives us Vedic culture then why they forget it.. its like a teacher teaches the student and but then slowly teacher forgot himself what he taught to his students.. so Vedic culture is completely originated from india.. and now if you question about horses then yes we transport them from central asia.. but then you will question about how Ramayan and Mahabharata shows horses, if there was no horses in India before Aryans came then its simple common sense that even in times of Mahabharata and Ramayan we are spread allover the world and have relations with farthest civilizations like Mesopotamia so we can easily get them from central Asia even in that time too and breed them in india.. and this aryan theory was only came because some Britishers does not have the answer that what happened between 1500BCE to 1100BCE that whole Indus Valley Civilization destroyed so they proposed this rubbish Aryan invasion theory and then claim that they gives us all this knowledge we have today..
See from the start Europeans never liked to see anyone above them and its same for india too they does not want to accept that we are far advanced and older civilization then them that's why there is this more reason why they proposed this theory because as Winston Churchill (British pm during 1940s and also a rubbish and cruel person) said that "Indians have missed the bus of industrial revolution or technology"..
Now its completely on you whether you believe it or not and sorry if you feel my thinking wrong or hated..
I love the peeled it for Ranveer. He is so disingenuous. He changes his narrative with every guest who speaks on Aryan invasion theory. We don’t suffer from Brain fog Ranveer!!!
Very well said
I think you should've made him talk a bit more without interrupting, coz when he directs his conversation towards a way, and viewer like me looking for his next sentence, you interrupt. I think as a lover of discussions and debates, you should know where the guest or speaker is directing his conversations too, and respond accordingly, not simply asking questions from the familiar things he mentions upon way of going somewhere. Hope you get it, rest all its a wonderful session. And I felt you should mention his name on the title. Much respect to history and to you both. Thanks.
What about Out of India theory ? What about entire "Sanskriti" that originated in India , connected to Sanskrit - Dance, multiple languages , Musci , grammar, math etc How can it all come from outside and no Sanskriti exist outside in Europe for e.g. ? This speaker is spouting an old theory,
Malayalam, Telugu , Kannada - Dravidian languages are so closely related to Sanskrit.
Aryan came here and they develop everything here....after coming to India nobody ever return and did not bring any culture belief or anything to europe back....."aaryans" invaded/travel India only with TATTU which they themself found.......in 1970-80....and with that TATTU they denied the thousand of years old civilization and few leftover KHACCHAR still belives it.....
There is no Dravidian
All these Indian languages are related to one another
They say Indo-European are close/marching but if we look into our All Indian languages and there grammer structure, you will find that all are having same grammar pattern and pronunciation, eg: Sawr and Vnajen , the writing pattern my differ but the pronounciation is the same. And even most of the words are same to Sanskrit.
Yes my friend South Indian languages are more close to Sanskrit.
Sanskrit is indian in origin. The theory only states that it comes from a family of languages which have common origin with european languages, not that it was made in europe. Dravidian languages are similar to sanskrit due to acculturisation. Proto tamil was the language of the original dravidians which was mixed with sanskrit to get the modern dravidian languages. I still dont understand why it is so hard for people to comprehend that migrations happened to india in the past.
@@Diavol0Krimson Completely agree with you except your usage of the term proto-*tamil --- it would be more historical to use the term proto-*Dravidian seen as the inference to best- explanation resulting from the fact that the yet undeciphered Harappan langauge bears most linguistic *closeness to the speculated proto-dravidian which has many other South Indian, few central indian tribal and few baluchi tribal languages as it's main descendants.
It's funny how every ancient language is categorised as indo-this and indo-that but they want to assume all of them originated outside India.
Very well said😂😂
So many people in the comments section are in complete shock and denial that this scholar is able to validate with facts that the aryans originated outside the Indian subcontinent. So what if they did or didn't? All humans emerged from somewhere in Africa anyway. We all came elsewhere.
People ( historians) believe all the things Greeks / roman documented
While Indian document record turn into mythology 👏👏
For your kind info whole Vedas is full of west ward migration of Indian vedic clans
Srbinda described migrated to west ( srbinda is ancient term for Serbs /srbenda)
Dasa were were shown thrown out of India ( current day their desendant known as daha people , found in Turkmenistan region)
Dasarajan yudha ( civil war of Aryans ) show whole split of main jana ( clans) of Aryans from Punjab those who outcasted made out their own Aryan culture in west ( aka indo Iranic)
@GREATER INDIA yeah OK even if true does it really matter when the entire human race originated from the tip of Africa as evidence indicates? That's the point I'm making.
By your logic you can also say that India subcontinent people migrated to Europe countries
It’s nice to see non Dravidian speakers feeling sooooo insecure that they want to disprove him so badly. What’s wrong in Indus Valley language being a Dravidian language isn’t it an Indian language. It’s good to first go through what research he has done and cross verify with his reference. Simply blabbering nonsense here won’t make sense. Don’t worry Dravidians won’t tell you to go back where you came from😅.
It is believed that Tamil language is born out of pellet drum which fell from Lord Shiva while he was dancing.
All mentions of Aryans from Sangam literature refers to the people who inhabited the region of Aryavarta after Vedic times.
Another song here, by Pāvai Kottilār, Marutham Thinai - What one concubine said about other jealous concubines
Akanānūru 336:
Translation:
If I go there, I will control him like the sun’s
rays that control the direction of nerunchi
flowers.
If I don’t do that, may the large bangles
on my perfect forearms break like the Aryan
forces that were destroyed by the brave
Chōla warriors with victorious spears and
shields as dark as the rain clouds, who darted
arrows from their fort in Vallam town, situated
behind a protective forest
Lol false quote, nothing like that ever exists in sangam literature. Go read the original source
@@vugbeshbara1103 you say which is the original source. Are you a Tamilan?
@@blade3625 yes I am tamilian, but disgusted by the black magic surrounding tamil nadu right now. Fake social justices fake verses fake propaganda, just show the quote from sangam literature right now or else you accept that you are all brainwashed
Poem is correct... but are you sure that the aryans that were mentioned in the poem are the brahmins ? Why because there are many brahmins/paarpanargal/ andhanargal who have contributed to the sangam literature like manulanar, tholkapiyar etc.
@@dkb10101 So andhanar, parpanar, Brahmins are they same or different? Kabilar was a andhanar who are variety of meat, also friend of Paari. Why none of the north Indian Brahmins were in 63 nayanmars of lord Shiva? All these nayanmars of lord Shiva spoke sanskrit or Tamil? Ask these questions to yourself and find the answers.
horses are used in mahabharata war which proves india have horses.
Mahabharata happened around 1200-800bc which was after the period of the migration.
@@Diavol0Krimson 5000 years from now is not 1200bc
@@Diavol0Krimson mahabharat war happened in 5561BC from 16 October to 2 November. If you don't research why do you spread lies.
@@vishnu6464 mahabharata mentions saraswati river Declining.. and we know when that happened
@@adityaraj2447 Saraswati river evidence starts from 172000+ BCE years ago flowing near Bikaner region then 70000+ BCE years ago Saraswati shifts to Kalibangan region. Around 50000+BCE to 40000BCE Yamuna separated from Saraswati and joined Ganga river. Saraswati was still a grand river till 22000+ BCE (around 8km wide). In 13000 BCE Shatudri(now Sutlej) also separated from Saraswati and shifted westward to meet Sindhu(Indus), the Grand Saraswati river mentioned in Rigveda had already started shrinking. From 7000BCE to 4500BCE there was intensification of monsoon and after 4500BCE saraswati river started shrinking rapidly and by 2000BCE saraswati river was completely gone.
Mahabharat has descriptions of saraswati flowing and going under the sand in some places, it's not a grand river anymore as saraswati had already started shrinking since 22000 BCE following separation of Shatudri in 13000 BCE.
Brahui language is spoken in sarawan & jhalawan areas of Balochistan.also in some parts of Sindh..iam a brahui speaking too.
is there any similarities between tamil and brahui really?here a video went viral when afganisthan was taken over by taliban a talibani was praying in a language which is much similiar to malayalam language(a dravidian language)
@@vineeshm1977 brahui speaking people are also living in Afghanistan. may be that person was talking in brahui
❤️ from tamil nadu
@@vanisridhar5509 separatist
@@kurd797 but u are not Dravidian Lmao Typical indo iranian nd indo aryans
The Marwari, Kathiawari, Manipuri, Spiti, Zaniskari, and Bhutia are the native horse breeds of India
..? those came from the Turco-Mongol people moving into the region. Look it up.
There are lot of similar words between brahui & Tamil_ Malylam..
(1)You - Ne (Brahui), Ne (Tamil, Malayalam)
(2)Come - Baa (Brahui), Vaa (Tamil, Malayalam)
(3)Snore - Khurkao (Brahui), Khurtai (Tamil)
(4)Eye - Xan (Brahui), Kan (Tamil)
(5)Stone - Xal (Brahui), Kal (Tamil)
(6)Milk - Pal (Brahui), Pal (Tamil)
(7)News - Haval (Brahui), Thahaval (Tamil)
vandanam in sankrit and vanakkam in tamil
brahui people are not native of that location .. they migrated from costal karnataka mahrastra gujrat to the present day balochistan much later than ivc civilization (mostly only 1400 yrs ago)
@@kartikshukla7171 brahui is not any cast or origin. Brahui is a language.
Milk - pal (Malayalam)
@@af9280 Gaw+pal= gopal
I know its a Muslim that is justifying this theory cuz he has to also justify another invaders that converted him & his family by force
Sach kadva hota hai 😂
@@VinodRathod-iv3rn konsa sach? Tum Rathod jaiso ka impotents ka?
A like for Abhijit Chavda Sir ❤️❤️
Correct explanation, not like other Hindu guests who just supported Hinduism even though I am Hindu Andaman Nicobar tribes who are untouched are the people who migrated from Africa to India, Dravidians are the real Indian later mixed with outsiders and formed complex and mixed religion which is modern Hinduism that's why we have diversity in gods, culture, language, foods etc.
Tell me clarify first thing that Arya invasion theory and arya migration theory is different.
So there is evidence that harappan civilization is purely destroyed by aryan invasion is not true .
But Aryan migration theory is true and vedic culture is different from Harappan civilization because of following reasons-
1. Harappan civilisation was urban civilisation with many urban centres.
Agriculture and trade was dominant. They have script. They made houses with The houses of that time were made of baked bricks.
Whereas Vedic culture was rural culture. They didnt have scripts (lipi), which is the best explanation that vedic culture and harappan civilization is different.
They were pastoral primarly.
They live in mud houses.
And harappan language was not associated with sanskrit .
So by this it is proved that vedic culture is not harappan culture and vedic culture started after the decline of harappan civilization.
They bring sanskrit with them.
Myths regarding Aryan Migration Theory (Read full):-
1. "NORTH INDIANS ARE FOREIGNERS AND SOUTH INDIANS ARE NATIVE":-
Actually Mainland Indians are descended from 3 groups:- Steppe Pastoralists ("Aryan"), Zagrosian Neolithic Farmers , and the first Group that arrived in India 'AASI'. Only difference is North Indians generally have higher proportions of Aryan genes than South Indians.
2. "THIS WESTERN CONSPIRACY WANTS TO IMPLY ARYANS BROUGHT SANSKRIT AND VEDA TO INDIA"
Sanskrit, in its Vedic form was developed in India. Vedas were also developed in India. They formed after Aryan already came to India
3. "ARYAN DESTROYED INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION"
Indus Valley civilization's collapse may have to do with Floods or drought (most probable). Aryans migrated to India towards IVC's end.
4. "HINDUISM IS OUTSIDE RELIGION" or "HINDUISM IS NATIVE RELIGION".
Aspect of Hinduism (which itself is a combination of different faiths, beliefs, tradition and to an extent philosophies) derive from many different practices. Folk elements of hinduism are derived from. Local folk religion. Many of the rigvedic deities are descended of gods in proto indo European gods such as Agni, Varuna. Some may have derived from IVC gods but we aren't sure. Some may have also been borrowed from BMAC.
5. "AMT IS WESTERN PROPOGANDA TO IMPLY EUROPEANS CAME TO INDIA TO CIVILIZE IT"
Saying Aryans are central asian or European is pathetic. Modern European themselves are descended from 3 groups:- Steppe Pastoralists, Early European Farmers (also called Anatolian Neolithic Farmers) and Western Hunter Gatherers. Indo Europeans migrated to two direct:- West to Europe and (East to central Asia and eventually South to Iran and indian subcontinent)
So I have 2 more things to say
1. To South Indians:- Do not have the notation that you are native and North Indians (sp. Brahmins) are invaders. Simple genetic ancestry reveals that most Indians have not AASI or Aryan but Zagrosian Neolithic Farmer (who are from iran) component in plurality. Even you have Aryan genes to an extent. And do not believe in racial theories of Caucasoid or mongoloid etc
2. To North Indians:- You are not invaders. Migration is common throughout human history as there was no borders back then. Significant ancestors were from steppes is nothing to feel bad for. For everyone eventually migrated out of sub Saharan Africa.
Bro you proved the Aryan migration theory 😂😂
@@VortexanimeFX yes. Because I want everyone to not fall for propoganda. AMT is real and is unfortunately used as means fro propoganda by both sides
@@neutralboi1984steppe Ancestry is not aryan .Indus valley civilization is vedic .there is no seperate aryan dravidian .
@@Divine_wave23 there is no seperate arya and dravida culture. Agreed
But IVC wasn't Vedic.
I am not at all surprised to see one sided blindness of the guest who completely turns a blind eye towards the Indic Evidence and propogates Aryan Invasion theory, Theory of Nataural Selection by Darwin as opposed to out of India (i.e Bharat ) theory and so on. The speaker acknowledges the good work of British in discovering our history, however doesn't criticise British for distortion of Indian History. The speaker is highly opinionated in some aspects. He is a Indian by body and British by mind. Distortion of History has continued in India i.e Bharat after partition of Bharat, thanks to duo of Nehru- Gandhi and Nehru's ties with leftists, marksist and Islamist people , who didn't have any honesty in telling the right history and no love for Bharat Mata. The anchor also changed colours as per the speaker. There were no counter questions asked. On the contrary there were agreements on all issues.
He is speaking logical things...the similarity between indo-european languages shows this
Inke hisab se to ghode the hi nahi to bhai hamare dharm me asva khaa se aaya aur ye chodo ashwagandha kaha se aya ayur vea me ... Mujhe pata hai modern theory ne laaaya 🤣😂😂😂
in bhimbetaka Caves of madhya pradesh, there are many paintings of where horses have been shown, and painting is more than 10,000 years old.
are they horses or some other animals ? and were horses widespread then or just confined to a small palce ?
How u find they are 10k old ?
@@jattmoosewala83 I'm sorry it is not 10k year old.. It is more than 10k years old may be 15k or 17k... As per c14 dating
@@indianbaba4935 gapp maarne me hum hindoo sabke baap hai 😁
@@jattmoosewala83machuda
8:23 he says cities disappeared suggesting there was invasion but he knows very well there is no evidence of battles. And also we know today why they could have abandoned the cities which is due to climate change, drying up of rivers etc
Ya , it can not be invasion because aryan migration happened in packet of wave and not in bunch.
But Local fight did happened. No War does not means no possiblity of fights.
An Arab says to an Aryan, Hey boy, come hug me, the Aryan says why the Arab says you are my son, the Mongol says my son, don't believe what he says, I am your real father, the Greek says who said I am his real father, the Aryan says wow, I didn't know how many fathers I have 😂😂🤣🤣 Aryan is not real
Where do you think Indus Valley people vanished? Why do you find pockets of Dravidians all over India? Indus Valley is not dead; it's alive in the souls of Dravidians... Why Tamils dislike Hindi? Its a story that will unfold over time! Does anyone know there are Tamil speaking people in Pakistan?
Please invite Sai Deepak , he will provide more clarity . He seems confused.
Aryan Invasion theory is to archaeology as the flat Earth theory is to astronomy 😂
He smirked on IceAge theory, but had not answer to it.
He is repeating Witzel but never addressed Thalageri who raised the wrongs in Witzel's theory. Why?
this is completely wrong. abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda .
please note that, volkwagen=lok wahan
parmanant=param anant
calender=kal antar
Wtf!?
Well Bhim betka cave paintings which dated back to 8000-1000 bce shows there were horses in India .
And in Indus valley civilization a horse shaped toy and some bones of horses were founded.
Those are bull and cow.Not horse
@@stardust2045 this is completely wrong. abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda .
@@stardust2045 🤡
@@theybecameus
Abhijit Chavda have been debunked many times by actual historian and geneticist from all over the world. And Sanjay Dixit is a liar because David Reich who's the lead geneticist from Harvard University of Rakhigarhi DNA believe in Aryan migration. If the lead geneticist of Rakhigarhi study agree with Aryan migration,why are Indians who work under him in denial?
@@theybecameus they will run from a true statement genetic throughout Indian and archeological evidence and make a conspiracy theory as always do 😂😂 your abhijit chavda and Dixit doesn't about history they doesn't even know what are sources they are basically conspiracy theorist like flat earther 😂😂
Indian subcontinent is upon multiple seismic plates, hence catastrophic earthquakes is surely a possibility, which could have destroyed structures. Another theory that comes to my mind, India is uniquely positioned as the longest and continuous civilization. Hence the pre historic buildings could have been broken down to build modern ones. Another fact that we should not overlook, is the Islamic invasion in the northern Indian region, where most of the civilization was based, Indus, saraswati, gangetic plains. These marauders definitely destroyed many such buildings and historical places.
India is on a single Tectonic plate. And there have been no volcanoes for lakhs of years.
Nothing catastrophic happened.
Just that Archeologist only manage to find things in dry areas, while Human being live in opposite kind of places.
Also these hypocrites, contradict their own theories. Which is, origin of any gene or lang should be at the region which has maximum derived variants of it. And India happens to have maximum derived languages of Sanskrit, India has has maximum derived genes of "R1", India has maximum derived gene of "F"...
So every standard history method. supports India to be source of origin of everything.
But these people consider IndoIranian as originators.
@@riscnx I agree that India is on a single tectonic plate. However your point that there has been no volcanoes here needs to be relooked at. The whole region of Chota Nagpur has Black soil and as far as my knowledge goes, black soil is a result of volcanic activity.
The whole northern region experiences earthquakes till to this day, since the Indian plate collided with the eurasian plate. This seismic activity has been going on for millennia. So my point that the indus - saraswati river (as geologist and archaeologists say) was the main region of the civilisational growth, whence the region experienced subsequent earthquakes, the topography changed making the glacier fed river of saraswati either change course or dry out completely. The story of saraswati river should not be dismissed as fiction, since our vedas do mention the 3 rivers of Ganga, Jamuna and Saraswati.
@@riscnx I agree with the rest of your views. I only had some disagreements or a different point of view, that which I have mentioned.
The Indus valley isn't in North India, Einstein.
@@jimbocho660 so you mean to say that the sites found in Rakhigarhi, lothal, kalibangan and other related sites are not a part of the indus valley civilisation? Or if any earthquake hitting the region of punjab or Haryana in India would magically not have altered the geography of the areas around these sites which transformed the elevation and other geological factors to have caused the shifting of rivers and changes in climate? Your understanding of the Indus Valley civilisation is very narrow. Please read again, or at best please don’t comment on someone who is a historian.
Three nations have the word Arya - aryavarta- India
varta became Bharata.
Aryan - Iran
Aryaland-Ireland
theory is theory, there is no evidence so it remains a theory, for so long it has remained a theory.
Science padi hai bhai?? Theory is based on evidences. It's hypothesis that you are talking about.
@@ronitrajput3934 still it isn't true. Aryan Invasion theory has been debunked
@@ronitrajput3934 if evidence is there then it is proven thing and not theory anymore....bhai tubhi padhle jara
Seriously this all stems from white supremacy and a eurocentric pov
We Indians should know about our true history it's high time!!!
@@ronitrajput3934 Bhai, physics ka theory aur history ke theory mae koi fark hai ki nahi??? Aryan invasion theory ke evidence probability pe based hai and Big bang theory ke evidence matlab infrared radiation background abhi bhi ham dekh saktey hai.
History ke theory ko sabse ke sath gholmol mat karo please, Aryan invasion theory ke proper evidence dene ke liye kafi time mila in historians ko lekin abhi bhi inke pas ek proper evidence nahi hai.
Abhi bhi random words ko milake bas theory ko reinforce karne ki koshish kartey hai.
Achha tu bata, tu convince ho gaya iske bato se, ki aryan invasion sach mae hua tha??
Correct explanation, not like other Hindu guests who just supported Hinduism even though I am Hindu Andaman Nicobar tribes who are untouched are the people who migrated from Africa to India, Dravidians are the real Indian later mixed with outsiders and formed complex and mixed religion which is modern Hinduism that's why we have diversity in gods, culture, language, foods etc.
Kuch bhi. Sanatan base is diversity. It's dhrama not religion we don't have set of rules like other people
I don’t like his perspective.
I feel something is missing this logic.
I don’t exactly look at the Mahabharat as an epic or mythology or religious scripture but like a history. And there are extensive information of horses and chariots.
It’s basically convenience for someone to see the evidences of Mahabharata but ignoring it and not taking it as benchmark.
Iam not trying to disrespect your beliefs
But mahabharata is a tough pill to swallow as "history"
You can believe whatever you want
But for me personally, i would rather take it as a story that teaches valuable lessons than as "history"
I mean, mahabharata speaks of demons demigods and gods, snake people and immortals
I just don't understand how someone can believe it as history
Mahabharatam is a myth
It's a fiction? Bro
@@adith9327 asi is currently searching for these fictional cities in gulf of khambat. You should probably address an email to both ASI and GoI to stop wasting time and money
this is completely wrong. abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda .
1:31 ranveer its not in malayalam. Malayalam itself got the phonetic from Tamil its called Zhagaram. The language name itself ends with it "Tamizh". Wish I could add audio here to help you pronounce it.
Yes though I'm not tamillian but it's an imp fact that people must know when they spell Tamil/tamizh while producing la sound tounge should be suspended in air and not to be touched to the roof of mouth or whateve you call it. It's so hard to try explaining without audio but this version of la doesn't exist in Sanskrit or many languages however there are many ancient texts that are written in Sanskrit and are available to few locals only who have stored then through generations do have such versions of la which in modern times written as zh to represent in English by tamillians. However Sanskrit grammer doesn't include this but certain texts from Kashmir and Goa do refer such sounds as bandhakshar i.e. The sounds that appear between two sound like zh version of la is an outcome of two other versions of la like while pronouncing one la is touching tip of tounge to the taali and tounge is to be touching the front part of mouth that is just behind your teeth(roof of mouth) and other versions is to touch the tip of tongue to taali (roof of mouth) at the back as we spell ळ in Marathi. And the la that we represent with zh is an average version of both sound that is by suspending toungue in middle. But nowadays this system is lost in even Sanskrit as this grammer is not known except for few locals around india
@@nagrajgovekar6305 you ate roght dude. Pronouncing Zh is just like pronouncing "la" except the tip of the tongue is pulled a bit backwards to the center of the mouth and a slight gap between the tip of the tongue and the roof of the mouth at the center of your mouth.
P. S- it is called the roof of the mouth so you are correct! 😉
@@nagrajgovekar6305 we have 3 la.
Myth
+1
abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda . tell about this challenge to everyone. to accept challenge, contact jaipur dialogues youtube channel
Wrong, chariots and horses have been already found.
Very very few
This is a very western Outlook of Indian history. Aryan invasion theory has been debunked too many times. Let's start analysing Indian history from Indian perspective
Wouldn't an Indian perspective be "Once upon a time foreigners came in chariots, enforced a caste system on us lasting thousands of years and then made us believe we all came from the same place all along to preserve legitimacy"?
@@NoneOfYourBusiness-nv5cv We are both speaking english, not Indian. Whether "caste" is an Indian word doesn't remove the fact that Indian has been ruled with Castes for literal thousands of years. THAT is a fact, no? It didn't have to be, but that is what the Aryan invasion did to you.
ARYAN MIGRATION WAS TRUE BUT MIGHT NOT BE INVATION.
13:08 On this auspicious ocassion of Ratha Saptami (literally means Chariot of Lord Sun(Surya Deva) driven by Seven horses), i'd like to draw ur attention to our history, about existence of chariot in India before colonisers acclaimed time, Its been mentioned in Mahabharata, Ramanayana and so on.Its in our Scripture. And if u want Physical Evidence, Ever visited Konark Sun temple? We built a freaking temple that resembles it. Must Applaud Ranveer's patience and professionalism at this point. Being soo well read, he could've debunked his theory in sec. but he gave the other person a chance.
When was Konark Temple built?
he Konark Sun Temple was built in 1250 CE during the reign of the Eastern Ganga King Narsimhadeva-1 from stone in the form of a giant ornamented chariot dedicated to the Sun god, Surya.
@@Swagnik-g8h that was a rhetorical question to point out if Konark temple has a chariot dedicated to Sun god in 1250 CE that doesn't prove existence of Horses/Chariots in 2000 BCE.
Oldest script in Devanagari lipi is only about 900 years old
Not only Konarak Temple what about Elephanta Cave also
This guy is either ignorant or is trying to dumb down things for ignorant Indians. 3:13 Ashurbanipal is a Semitic, not an Indo-European name. The ancient Assyrian language is Semitic. Hittite, Mittani and Kassite are Indo-European, he should have picked Tushratta of the Mittani or the deities Tarhunnaz and Inara of the Hittites as examples of ancient Indo-Europeans in Anatolia and the Levant.
After watching this episode on indian history, i thought, every speaker is inclined towards a perticular agenda, they present the facts according to their believes and perspectives. Horses are not native of indian subcontinent, totally screwed up my mind ( some experts present the archioligical evidence like fossils , ashvmegh ygya and donation of horses in indian puraan and all).
Yes man. You also have agendas and biases. The aryan migration theory might be false I dont know, but it take care of all this. Horses came after aryans migrated and vedas were also written after that. So they were not native to India.
Feel so sad for those who still believe in bramhinical history and thinks ramayana and mahabharata are real events.. Either they don't understand anything related science or just an emotion bound child who refuses to leave bonding with fairytale characters.
I don't know on what basis this guy comes to the conclusion it all began in Caspian region.
It can begin in India and spread everywhere.
Europe is much more colder, so may even more that 10,000 years before definitely initial migration must have happened from Africa to India and thn afterwards from somewhere in between from that root to Europe and Central Asia...afterwards revers migration may also have happen as it's very very cold near Europe.
@@TheRakeshgautam lol
Short and simple
when there was no Aryan invasion theory before British Rule but after during British rule created Aryan invasion theory for just to divide India based on their cast and 2nd things there are nothing mentioned Aryans and dravidians in our Hindu scriptures also.
There was no mention of Indus valley civilization in Hindu scriptures. So they must be wrong also?
Then who are the dasyu natives in the vedas
@@taka-taktak Yes, dasyus were natives , but the arysns were outsiders !
Intelligent and well read person.
People in the comments who're saying we had horses and chariots... This guy never said we didn't have horses. He's saying they had to be imported.
What an interview ,an unbiased inner view, amazing openness, brilliant perspective. Sanskrit is definitely from AfPak area adjoining Iran. Stunned by the man's integrity. Kudos to you,let us look into all areas of convergence.
Irfan Habib... You got a successor. Man his attitude, the way he lies and propagates the " British founded and invented everything, Aryans comes from turkey " .
He have all qualities to to become next Irfan Habib 😜😜😂😂
Zakir naik alsọ speak like that " wẹ believe"
Humble request to all North Indian Hindu brothers. Please keep an open mind. We are here to uncover the truth. This is for knowledge and nothing changes if Aryan migration/invasion is proved to be true. Nobody is going to hold you responsible for Aryan invasion/migration. So chill.
One another dark side on Gandhi invention is “Buniyadi Sikaha/Nayi Talim/Basic education “. Educational trusts are taking advantage of buniyadi rule for child labour
Aryans crushed indus valley civilisation and sent the Dravidians to the south. The remaining ones became Dalits. Who were made slaves and raped
So the Aryans come from Europe? Sanskrit came from Syria?
He was partly right. Sanskrit is not from india likewise it’s not from Syria as well. It’s somewhere from Russia. You can find many similarities in Russia n Sanskrit.
@@shankarthiyagarajan6476 what bro what a joke 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@shankarthiyagarajan6476 Russia me India se oldest Sanskrit kaha likha hai jara batana dhundke
@@abhinavgokhale6917 ye le Russia mein oldest source hai to hisab sankrit ka script hai devangiri Jo 9 century ad mein bani 😂 aur india mein oldest source bas prakrit hai
That means sanskrit went from india to russia @@shankarthiyagarajan6476
There is NO evidence of a proto Indo European language, neither of many statements he made. Like the place where these supposed proto Indo Europeans lived, that they were advanced enough to build chariots, etc. These are ALL theories and speculations as well, NO evidence exists for their support. Also, we would have remembered Ashok, and maybe even Indus civilization if our libraries and culture were not burned down by outside invaders. Also, the statement he made about horses and chariots has been disproven when a chariot, the OLDEST in the world was found in Sinauli.
Sir Abhijit Chavda would literally destroy this guy with facts.
@ganeshtadigadapa1057 lol 😂 these western slipper lickers come in all shapes and sizes
@ganeshtadigadapa1057 it's a pity that u don't know the source of your info. Indian history textbooks were copied from Max Muller's(a British bureaucrat) writings.
@ganeshtadigadapa1057 there was never a caste system in India. There were varnas. Which the British modified into castes.
@raistar007 caste system was there but it was much more complex and based on the work done by an individual. The Britishers over simplified and brought the extremism in it.
That guy called Pashtuns are Indians, how can you believe that guy
Till how long will you deny the fact that around 4,500 years Sarasvati river dried up completely and around that same time we find mass graves in Western Europe of their indigenous people. Which is described as a population and genetic change event in the European continent…
And as far as Tamil languages found in Pakistan Sindh was ruled by Tamil rulers as they dominated the navy during that time. And they were the ones who transported spices etc to that part directly through sea route.
Have you wonder they never talk about chola dynasty who had a major naval base in Andaman
Chola ancestors are manu nidhi cholan and Cibi Chakravarti we came from north to south after invation.
Buslins, Chims, Mibrels, Beftist can believe whatever they want about Aryan “tourism” theory. The truth is aj bhi pandit koi bhi puja se pehle sankalp ke samay bolta hai-Jamboodweepe Aryavarte Bhartavrashe with current of date in millions of years and gotra. This is the ultimate proof for me.
Great one beer biceps bringing a true Gentleman in your show
Why there is big towns and golden towns of our epics like Mahabharat, Ramayana never found, not any single evidence, When ever the ASI digs always they found Buddha. The oldest manuscript of Rigveda which is found in 14 th century ( 1464 AD ) in Vedic age all of Vedic books are written so there is no evidence from that time.
Ranveer ji❤️ my day is off to a great start with this upload! I look forward to watching your videos! I love your videos so much it motivates me
R u there on Instagram
Oh.
Ayesha ji. No wonder u like this video.
Ranveer is playing both sides
what are your sources... books that you read... evidences provided by British
meh 😒
I need more 🤷🏽♀️ if only 10% have been dug in india how can you confirm this theory 🤔
Genetic study and archeological evidence ligustical evidence tuze isme Buddhi nahi to kyu padraha 😂
Bkl hai kya
This guy is a true Indo Aryan Chad who knows history. Hindus can just cope here😂
Source: Trust me bro 😂😂🤣
yeah bro. this is completely wrong. abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda . this is utter clown world 🤣
@@theybecameus it is not his problem he is just reading the outdated books genetic evidence are quite opposite what this guy said
😂😂😂😂
Buddha was not a schythian. What this guy is saying? He doesn't even know to pronounce Schythian. Send him to Chavda sir.
Please bring in knowledgable people like this man.
this is completely wrong. abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda .
Finally someone with knowledge
Whether he is right or wrong does this theory matter now? We all are Indians, even if we don't have an Indian race, we Indians were always united, we've so many different culture & languages. Don't take too much pride or disgust for what ever happened in the past.
👍
It does matter because he is distorting the narrative of our history and civilization
He says the word 'Ra' is probably from dravidian languages. So Shri Rama came from the south?
Not 'Ra' but sadak 'dra' and that too isn't available in Tamil or even in English...so only he totally messed up in linguistic explanation.
@@TheRakeshgautam actually! This Aryan Invasion theory was created to divide India
@ARYAN MIZDHA abhijit chavda has proved aryan invasion theory wrong multiple times. IAS Officer Sanjay Dixit has announced award of 2crore 10 lakhs to whomever proves aryan invasion theory right. If this bald guy thinks its true, then he should accept the challenge and prove that to Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda . tell about this challenge to everyone. to accept challenge, contact jaipur dialogues youtube channel
there are chariots found in Sinauli which is contemporary to the indus valley. the excavation is recent one.
17 mins of him talking and I latched on to nothing just blatant speculation and no quotation or references. He is a historian and names 2 species of humans ..." Homo sapiens, Neanderthals etc.." this was enough for me to understand what background research he is coming from.
Topic tha -: Aryan Invasion around 1500BC
par ye kya bad bada rahe hai? Scythians, Greeks? They came much later, what about Aryans?
13:12 Ranveer's Reaction: Yeh kya baat ! yeh kya baat karta hai yarr
6:16 While a post Ice-Age out of India movement did happen, but that is largely of maternal haplogroups, and it is well known that Steppe ancestry is passed down paternally and according to the findings of Reich, Narsimhan etc this entered the subcontinent and Western Europe around 4000 years ago, and in Spain resulted in the annihilation of pre-existing males. So the immediate post Ice-Age movement has no relevance to Indo-European languages.
One of the primary obligations we have when examining history is to scrutinize the information presented with a critical mindset. It's all too common for historical accounts to contain inconsistencies, prejudices, and outright inaccuracies - and it's our duty as inquisitive learners to recognize these discrepancies and strive for the truth.
An instance of this can be observed when discussing the origins of the so-called "Aryan race." A glaring contradiction persists regarding this topic. Specifically, concerning those who claimed to follow the principles of Adolf Hitler: On one hand, they assert that he advocated a racially motivated ideology and believed that “Aryan” Nordic people had entered India from the north approximately 1,500 years prior. He also posited that these Aryans committed the “crime” of intermingling with local “un-Aryan” populations, thereby losing the traits that made them genetically superior to all other human beings.
However, this assertion lacks concrete evidence, devoid of substantiating documents from German government archives, verbal testimonies, or written records. It appears based on hearsay or fabricated stories propagated by individuals without factual backing. Moreover, I must emphasize another blatant inconsistency in these historians' claims: they assert that "Germans covertly arrived along India's eastern borders" to "uncover the 'source of origin of the Aryan race.'"
The issue here is apparent - if Aryans indeed entered from the north, their "origin of source" would already be known, rendering the Germans' purported mission to discover it nonsensical. These two assertions directly contradict each other, and this glaring inconsistency should serve as a red flag prompting us to delve deeper. When we encounter such conspicuous logical flaws in historical accounts, it's a clear indication that the information provided may be unreliable, prejudiced, or even deliberately misleading.
Sanskrit language, (from Sanskrit saṃskṛta, “adorned, cultivated, purified”), an Old Indo-Aryan language in which the most ancient documents are the Vedas, composed in what is called Vedic Sanskrit. Although Vedic documents represent the dialects then found in the northern midlands of the Indian subcontinent and areas immediately east thereof, the very earliest texts-including the Rigveda (“The Veda Composed in Verses”), which scholars generally ascribe to approximately 1500 BCE-stem from the northwestern part of the subcontinent, the area of the ancient seven rivers (sapta sindhavaḥ).
Source:Brittanica: most trusted dictionary and encyclopaedia
Sanskrit's first evidence was not found in syria, his madarsa education is nothing more than misinformation and propaganda.
I am not sure about the other things, but we definitely knew about Ashoka. There is a stupa in mantralayam in andhrapradesh which was said to be planted by Ashoka during his expansion period. People have been going there and knew it as ashoka stupa way before, the british.
not true.
Those who want scientific evidences... check the videos by Dr. Neeraj Rai, Disha Ahluwalia etc.
The most openminded view so far ….
Thanks for the show.