Sony a7C Hands-on Review + comparisons to Sony a7 III

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 766

  • @FredBGG
    @FredBGG 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    The touch focus does not have lag in reality. It starts working the instant you tap the screen, the lag is the lens focusing.
    The box displays in the moved position once focus is obtained.
    There are also two touch focus modes on the rear screen. Normal and with tracking.
    Track pad function while you use the evf is totally different and it too is quick. Some have mistakenly said it is slow because they don't use it correctly.
    It has a "sticky" function once you focus. To move quickly you just have to lift the finger and hop to where you and to go.
    Once you develop muscle memory for this it is faster than a joystick.
    I too at first thought it was funky until I understood how it works.

  • @legend240891
    @legend240891 4 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    0:32 one of the best photos Chris have ever composed

    • @AaronCreates
      @AaronCreates 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right?😂 it's an incredible photo and he shows it so casually

  • @motogpwin
    @motogpwin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    10:41 looking closely at the bench, someone has expressed what we all have been going through in the past 6 months

  • @lattesweden
    @lattesweden 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Nice review. One thing most reviewers forget to test is how the EVF works for people who wear glasses (not all can have contact lenses). Maybe you could get a pair of glasses without correction to test with?

    • @tastemysaucer
      @tastemysaucer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just dropped the same reply before I saw this one

  • @thomaso20001
    @thomaso20001 4 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    I was dreaming of such a camera for YEARs. For me it came too late, as I'm now happy with a Z6. However it's refreshing and exciting to see a rangefinder style camera with all the SONY tech inside. But it's a shame that they have not implemented the new menue system. Many thanks for the, as always, informative and entertaining review. You guys rock!!!!!

    • @travelerexperience
      @travelerexperience 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I saw here in Romania the Z6 for 1400 euros and the Sony 7C for 2000. What do you think its better on Nikon? I know Sony is more expansive but the SD card are cheaper and the lenses too because you can buy a lot of third comapnies.

    • @bjure8111
      @bjure8111 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@travelerexperience I sold my A73 due to the handling (ergos) that was a pain with larger lenses. And the colors in A73 is not good, sure you can fix most of it in post if you shoot raw, but spending so much time to get rid of that strange green and magenta cast in the images, isn't worth the time in my opinion. I bought the z6 and I love it. Sure the autofocus is a tad slower, but there is so much more to a camera than that.
      When it comes to lenses Nikon has released a respectful amount of lenses, given the system is only 2 years old. And all of the z lenses are incredible good. And if you want you can use all of the af-s lenses from previous mount + third party lenses. Then there is the fringer adapter where you can adapt even Canon EF or Sony lenses with good result.
      Then there is the video side of things. The stabilizer in A7III isn't nearly as good as in the z6. Even used with ois lenses the A7III hardly beat z6 with non stabilized a lens.
      Many may have other opinions, but that's my reflection of using the z6 for a month.

    • @travelerexperience
      @travelerexperience 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bjurra 🙏🏼

    • @markshirley01
      @markshirley01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@bjure8111 the C has new colour. Most people say its pretty good now. Ive even seen canon people say this.

    • @bjure8111
      @bjure8111 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markshirley01 let's hope so, it would be a step on the right direction. Let's also hope that they increase the grip a bit and make the ergos better for upcoming A7 models. Then I will be back in the Sony stable again 😊

  • @SkylerKing
    @SkylerKing 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    All jokes and jabs aside, I’m surprised it costs $1,800. Even if we ignore the cheaper full frame options from other manufacturers and just look at the Sony lineup, it’s not particularly attractive. From what I am hearing, this camera is basically an A7iii. An A7iii is $2,000 (and has been since it came out a few years ago). So you’re saving $200... but you’re losing the MUCH better viewfinder, the 2nd card slot, the AF joystick, etc. Plus you’re still getting the now “older” tech of the A7iii on a “new” camera in 2020.
    Idk, just seems like if you wanted the A7iii you’d be better off just buying the A7iii. If you wanted to save money while still having an A7iii, you’re better off buying a used A7iii.

    • @kahvac
      @kahvac 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The A7iii looks to be a better value.

    • @sosomelodies659
      @sosomelodies659 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Flippy screen doesn't make up for it? How bout better af tracking than A7III? New color science, more shots per charge, carbon fiber mechanical shutter, deeper buffer, smaller, lighter, cheaper, compatible with Sony's digital shotgun mic, auto focus points colors, no record limit, and no overheating.

    • @yusei151
      @yusei151 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@sosomelodies659 Wait are you using rational thinking.... we don't do that here.

    • @MichaelKefeder
      @MichaelKefeder 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@sosomelodies659 another thing that is not mentioned anywhere in the reviews, the A7C videos can be stabilised in post using its gyroscopic metadata, the A7III videos cannot. It will be interesting to see the first in practice uses of that camera, it's not as bad as people make it out to be.

    • @sosomelodies659
      @sosomelodies659 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MichaelKefeder I heard about it but wasn't sure it was featured so I didn't mention it. Thanks for the confirmation tho. 👍

  • @autokss
    @autokss 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Ooof. The sadness intro was right in the feels. That was... different.

  • @deanisplemoni
    @deanisplemoni 4 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    "That's asking a lot of anyone's thumb" hahaha

    • @alexdubois6585
      @alexdubois6585 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep, can't give a thumb up because of the wheels and the viewfinder. What a shame.

  • @MichaelLaing71
    @MichaelLaing71 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    When I know I am going to hate the camera, when Chris compliments the grip.

  • @tomsueyek9596
    @tomsueyek9596 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I totally agree with your gripes with the EVF. Was a big turn off from the smaller-bodied Sonys.

    • @alexdubois6585
      @alexdubois6585 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Such a shame. Can't give a thumb up for that reason and the no front-dial.

  • @thecommenter578
    @thecommenter578 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Man, that lens is sharp. Pretty impressive for a kit lens

    • @StaffViet2009
      @StaffViet2009 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope, weak corner, even stopped down

    • @SamyT1994
      @SamyT1994 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It produces beautiful colours too!

  • @rhalfik
    @rhalfik 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    8:57 Chris being earritating.

  • @smithy1011
    @smithy1011 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can never get over your video quality and than the detail in the review its like you created the camera yourself :)

  • @AgnostosGnostos
    @AgnostosGnostos 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Last but not least this review of a7C. I remember in 2010 when you were one of the firsts to review the innovative Sony NEX-3 and NEX-5, the first mirrorless cameras by Sony. I saw that video then and it was the main reason I entered the e-mount world. Something I have never regret. Since then the duo has changed channel and is not as fast as before.

  • @56floorer
    @56floorer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Lot of camera nerds not happy with this camera (so many negative comments from people who were never in the market anyway) but for a lot of "average people" with the money this will be a blast.
    It looks good, it's compact with that lens, an any salesperson with half a brain will stick customers on the end of it and say look how well the auto focus works, see how it follows people around and that sensor takes a damn good picture however old it is. Not to mention video vlogging features.

    • @56floorer
      @56floorer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      plus btw the lens range is comparable to phone cameras

  • @simonbrain308
    @simonbrain308 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Hey, loved the humour at the start of the video! As for the camera, it's not for me, I already have the A7III. But I'm disappointed that Sony didn't put in the new menu system. Let's hope they put that right with the A7IV (and don't raise the price too much!)

  • @JohnDennery
    @JohnDennery 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    That kit lens looks amazing! Looks like a really fun grab-and-go setup. I have no problem with bigger bodies and lenses but I think many people underestimate the pure joy of such a light, compact setup. Reminds me of when I first got the A6000 with 16-50 - such a great experience! Thanks for making reviews I can actually trust. Cheers

    • @SMGJohn
      @SMGJohn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Less intrusive too for street photography

  • @bobbaker222
    @bobbaker222 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Still waiting for the long ago-promised comparative reviews of the various photo editing programs (Lightroom, Capture One, Luminar, etc.). Using these programs is a part of many (most?) photographers' workflow, and I would seriously *love* to hear your take on their various strengths and weaknesses. I *always* look forward to seeing your video reviews, and have followed you guys from early on in the Camera Store days. I believe Jordan indicated a few years back that you were going to do this, but it was, admittedly, around the transition time from Camera Store to DPReview, so it might have gotten lost in the shuffle. But I think many DPReview TV watchers would appreciate the special Alberta wit applied to photo editing programs. Thanks for considering this suggestion, and keep up the great work!

    • @TidesOnEarth
      @TidesOnEarth 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am a relatively new photographer but I absolutely love Iuminar4.

  • @ThomasPhamKESAT
    @ThomasPhamKESAT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Does the viewfinder let you add an eye up like the A6000? I don't think this will kill Sony A6600. This camera is $600 more expensive (plus tax). Also, full frame lenses are more expensive.

  • @AmalSKuriakose
    @AmalSKuriakose 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    *Most depressing beginning in a camera review ever...so depressing that I loved it!

  • @TVe200
    @TVe200 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    For me the EVF in a7c is worse than in a6600 because you can't have an eyepiece cup on a7c. That cup helps a lot.

    • @Reviews4fun1
      @Reviews4fun1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      My NEX6 from 2012 has an eyepiece

    • @mikldude9376
      @mikldude9376 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep , and on the A73 you can buy multiple types of eye piece extender accessories among other things which is very nice .
      and another problem with buying new off the shelf models is that they dont have a great variety of stuff made for them ,
      like my A73 being the third generation model , i can almost buy a73 stuff in a milk bar ..... maybe thats exaggerating a tad , but you get the drift , any camera store , or ebay , electronics shops , very rare to not find past sony alpha stuff ..
      i love the fact i can own an A9 and an a73 or a7r3 and just buy one battery grip and it will fit all of them .

  • @MadEnglishTV
    @MadEnglishTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว +183

    I'm so glad they made a vlogging lens to vlog my nose. Great job Sony.

    • @johnkoelsch5030
      @johnkoelsch5030 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mad English TV what is “vlogging😐

    • @TheTongo11
      @TheTongo11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@johnkoelsch5030 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlog

    • @gicechicken7062
      @gicechicken7062 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheTongo11 still dont understanf

    • @NAMCHINDigiView
      @NAMCHINDigiView 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just put the details
      th-cam.com/video/8Iv_KKAia48/w-d-xo.html

    • @fdl31
      @fdl31 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      C

  • @rifattanvirrafi36
    @rifattanvirrafi36 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Man, you look devastated. Cheer up, bro! I know it's tough in this pandemic situation. But we're not used to see you like this. I mean you are one of the most joyful person on TH-cam. ❤

  • @AndySomething
    @AndySomething 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The form factor of that camera is perfect! I never use the viewfinder in my A7iii anyways. I'd love to see in a future version two card slots but probably won't happen due to size. The A7Cii could definitely tempt me away from the larger bodies.

  • @macobean
    @macobean 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    waiting for fuji 50mm f1 review

  • @3flyte_3flyte
    @3flyte_3flyte 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I bought the a7C because I needed a backup to my Leica M bodies. The a7C is an art camera for artists, not hobby people. I have a bunch of Russian L39 lenses, too. The a7C is small and almost the same size as a rangefinder. I could care less about the squinty viewfinder...have you looked throught a Barnack III? This viewfinder of the a7C is great compared to looking through a IIIF Barnack. The dials? I hardly work the dials once I have it set up to shoot. The ergonomics is excellent; perfect for my hands, actually. I think the newbs are spoiled these days. The old guys who came into photography in the 60's, 70's and 80's love the a7C. Lastly & bestly (LOL) it's full-frame!

  • @OCAQelvin
    @OCAQelvin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Finally, I have found the best camera for me.
    No record limit
    Weather seal
    Fully articulating screen
    Full frame
    Not "look at me. I am a big camera here" style.
    Better battery life
    Better AF than many others
    And more
    If there was no crop on 30p 4k, it would be 100% perfect. But who cares, even films are 24p.

  • @stevenpam
    @stevenpam 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nearly didn’t watch this because I thought Gerald already told me everything I needed to know about this camera, but I’m glad I did... YOU GUYS ALWAYS BRING IT!

  • @Philson
    @Philson 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    No mention of the lens ecosystem? I think the Sony is a great choice!

    • @MrLogandm
      @MrLogandm 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      While it would be a good choice to go sony just spend more money and buy a better camera

  • @CHEFPKR
    @CHEFPKR 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Im actually really interested in the Auto focus

    • @BlueBomberTurbo
      @BlueBomberTurbo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Video from DPR when Real Time Tracking premiered:
      th-cam.com/video/SG37PzFSyKU/w-d-xo.html

    • @HAlariousInc
      @HAlariousInc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Come on dude, its a Sony. AF is probably going to be good

    • @markshirley01
      @markshirley01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes its the AF that is the star feature for me. Plus Im interested in the Catalyst Browse software compatibility.

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@markshirley01 it seems that all new high end Sony cameras like a7c a7Riv a6600 a7siii a9ii have similar strong autofocus system

    • @biplabkumarmahato4799
      @biplabkumarmahato4799 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too!

  • @trym2121
    @trym2121 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Body only is $1800 over here and a7iii is $1500. It's hard to justify that $300 just for compact size and more advanced real time tracking.
    I suppose if this sells well, they are going to do the usual Sony policy of 1st Gen camera and gonna update this within less than 2 years to 2nd Gen.

    • @tannersheppard9651
      @tannersheppard9651 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Here in Canada land the A7C body is $400 less than the A7iii body, so I guess that's cool

    • @natekong3596
      @natekong3596 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would pay $300 extra for real-time tracking alone. People really underestimate this feature. It really is game changer. It is almost impossible to miss focus with this turned on.

    • @yusei151
      @yusei151 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Edgar G. Son Sony should have cut into their a7siii sales with those improvements you just said right? Smart

    • @tannersheppard9651
      @tannersheppard9651 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@natekong3596 it makes no difference 90% of the time. Used a7riv and a7iii both nailed focus. Save money for dual card slot, useable EVF, better ergonomics

  • @user-gs3pt1uf1g
    @user-gs3pt1uf1g 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nicely articulated feeling of doom and gloom in the beginning. That's why I like these guys - they don't do robotic specs reviews, but add a human touch.

  • @didriketholm6852
    @didriketholm6852 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I just wanted to stop by and say that I absolutely love your reviews. You guys have perfected the review like phlearn has perfected the tutorial in the photo world, for me at least. Thank you for all the hard work!

  • @SunnySoCal
    @SunnySoCal 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i think for me i’ll still go with the a7iii for the bigger body and because i don’t really require super fast AF i shoot completely manual unless i’m doing portraits and the a7iii will be more than enough for my needs

  • @Nerdhaunt
    @Nerdhaunt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:18 is that "Three blind men and an elephant" reference 😂

  • @appleWhisky43
    @appleWhisky43 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just tested a7cand compared with a a7r3 at a sony store. It's freakin light and fast. Very casual camera which packs power underneath the beautiful body. Downside is it feels bit empty when you hold it and the viewfinder is pathetic. I'm a casual enthusiasts, so I chose to go with a7c as convenience is my priority

  • @TraumaTeamRacing
    @TraumaTeamRacing 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guys presentation style is absolutely on point. Awesome review!

  • @SortedSouls
    @SortedSouls 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could you make an episode of A7c with the DJI RSC2. Lot of confusion with video/photo setup it seems. Would really help me make my first vlog setup purchase decision. Thanks.

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      a7c is perfect for gimbal work

  • @irutgers
    @irutgers 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you were comparing the A7c and the Fuji XT-4 for street photography (understanding we’re talking full frame sensor and aps-c sensor). (I have the Nikon Z6II which I love) which one would you choose and why?

  • @titouyou1
    @titouyou1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's the use of such a compact body on a full size sensor as long as you need a bigger lens if you're searching image quality, kit lens is simply pulling it down. Better take a M43 or an APSC with pro lenses, no ?

  • @theleg0817
    @theleg0817 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you both for the many great reviews over the last decade , top class

  • @3BMEP
    @3BMEP 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    EAR-itating! Love seeing you guys on screen!

  • @sirjoshuapaul
    @sirjoshuapaul 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm glad you did a review on this camera. Can you guys do a Sony a7c and the Fuji XT-4?

  • @harbinger8083
    @harbinger8083 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Basically the NEX7 FF successor I was waiting for back in 2012 :)

  • @manuelgreil4306
    @manuelgreil4306 4 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    Sony found this thing in their basement, remembered that they wanted to release it two years ago, dusted it off, added 500 bucks to its price just for shits and giggles....and bam, proceeded to instantly render their latest APS-C lineup obsolete. On the upside, Sony proved that backwards time travel *is* possible. :)
    I'd rather save up for the A7SIII. On an unrelated note: for how much do kidneys sell these days? :) :)

    • @OptLab
      @OptLab 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nex5r and nex3 are like 2 times smaller in volume than this a7c. More than twice the weight. While the FF is very tempting, people don't realise how every iteration got bigger and bigger. Edit: a7 series are more than twice the weight, but not a7c

    • @MrBazReviews
      @MrBazReviews 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sort of a "back to the future" camera isn't it. They timewarp back and pick up the parts to re-use them. Some odd choices
      Strange DPR seem to be pulling punches on this one, the price is all wrong way way too much. An easy offering to ignore

    • @BlueBomberTurbo
      @BlueBomberTurbo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pretty sure Sony didn't have flappy screens two years ago...

    • @OptLab
      @OptLab 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BlueBomberTurbo nex5r does have a flippy screen. For 8years

    • @MrBazReviews
      @MrBazReviews 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@BlueBomberTurbo They did 2011, the A77 central articulating LCD ideal for stills and video. Photographers are not so keen on the side flip for many reasons

  • @HendrikMorkel
    @HendrikMorkel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for that great, informative, CHEERFUL Video Jordan and Chris!
    As a A7 III Videographer I don't understand your "complaints" about the Autofocus system of the camera - in my experience (soon 19 months) and running the latest Firmware the Autofocus is nothing but great, it works really well - and I know, as I often also stand in front of the camera! So I am wondering if you're running an old Firmware on your A7 III?

  • @stefanck
    @stefanck 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just a question with your shots, why is your ISO so high ? Was it really that dark on that day ?

  • @kp66udv
    @kp66udv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interested to see the optical performance comparison of the Sony 28-60 vs Tamron 28-75 and Tamron 28-200.

  • @sandrahildebrand4475
    @sandrahildebrand4475 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice and helpful video, TY. What about rolling shutter on this camera?

  • @quantumeseboy
    @quantumeseboy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you move to Mediterranean, I've had it with Calgary colors!

  • @deanisplemoni
    @deanisplemoni 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That scene at 4:12 is just gorgeous. Those Panasonic colours are (amongst?) the best.

  • @pregart001
    @pregart001 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I admire your enthusiasm. But I just can't understand why most videos are out of focus. Sometimes sharpness is good, as in 4:12, 10:20, 11:18. I suppose a lot of people find it unpleasant to watch a video that is so blurry.

  • @Anarki2U
    @Anarki2U 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the stiling of the Sony A7c very much with the EVF out to the very side of the camera, I hope that all future A7/A9 Sony cameras will have this design, but with larger EVF in higher resolution.

  • @beats1234
    @beats1234 4 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    “Entry-level price point”
    $1800
    ???

    • @user-ok6ef9zn4f
      @user-ok6ef9zn4f 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Entry level for full frame

    • @giklab
      @giklab 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@user-ok6ef9zn4f The Canon RP is 999€. 1299 with a kit lens. Z5 is 1399, 1699 with a kit lens. Etc.

    • @davidhunternyc1
      @davidhunternyc1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      I agree with Joey. We humans are crazy today. $1800 is an entry level camera. $3,000 is an entry level computer. $65 a month is perfectly acceptable for a TV streaming service. The big boys are here to take our money and they don't care how poor the rest of us become. The fact that these expenditures are now normalized is crazy.

    • @beats1234
      @beats1234 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The prices have definitely gone up faster than the tech has. When I bought my a7ii for $1600 with kit lens in 2015, it wasn’t considered entry level. More autofocus points and faster burst shooting are nice, but the iterations don’t justify Sony’s price increases, in my opinion. I really like this camera but will wait to buy it until the price comes down to a point I can stomach.

    • @bargh70
      @bargh70 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's at least $300 just for having "Sony" on it.

  • @Slowjo1221
    @Slowjo1221 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is the review I’ve been waiting for

  • @K22MDL
    @K22MDL 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As usual guys great presentation as always. Thanks to you both just purchased an A7C..

  • @ivn.b
    @ivn.b 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Been shooting with apsc for yearssss. I think this might be my stepping stone to full frame

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      perfect time to upgrade to FF, might not even feel the difference in weight, but many FF lenses are heavier than apsc

  • @briansavage932
    @briansavage932 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This camera isn't for stills. The evf isn't meant to be actually used in any meaning ful way. This is a vlogging rig. It's meant to have the screen flipped to the back and put on a gimbal. That's all.

    • @speygeek
      @speygeek 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      an EVF isn't mandatory to take stills, I think the camera is performing well on every level tbh.

    • @briansavage932
      @briansavage932 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@speygeek Fair enough.

  • @Rosyna
    @Rosyna 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The a7c uses the BIONZ X processor from the a7 so it doesn’t get the better codecs, better autofocus (less lag), better frame rates, new menu system of the a7s III as that uses the new BIONZ XR processor.

  • @martysender5539
    @martysender5539 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    forget the AC whatever. the S1H video is simply lovely. stay tuned. the gh6 is coming. man, i got ta get me one of those S1Hs.

  • @martydibergi5228
    @martydibergi5228 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You guys should come to Toronto. Parking is free, Tim Hortons is everywhere, sun shines always and Kasey Stern lives here😏

  • @lettleal2009
    @lettleal2009 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A7c = C for cheerful, love it. Thanks for the review.

    • @Ferroza-m8d
      @Ferroza-m8d 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      a7c = a7 circumcised

  • @soheilmasoumi3009
    @soheilmasoumi3009 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great video.
    Is the Sony a7c camera suitable for recording long-term videos? For example, two hours of uninterrupted record?
    Doesn't it heat up?

  • @Kalama_Llama_King_Kong
    @Kalama_Llama_King_Kong ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys are so fun. Love your channel so much."Sharp!"😆

  • @CallMeChato
    @CallMeChato 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I liked the fact that during the depressing portion of the video you tossed in a picture of Jordan. Mean.

  • @robrechtart
    @robrechtart 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is the A7c THE new ff street shooting camera? Would be cool to see a street shooting review with a small lens like the Voigtlander 40mm f1.4 or a Samyang 45mm f1.8 if autofocus needed. Compared to the RX1R in size and capability?

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      interesting, a7c seems about same as RX1, it's like stuffing a73 into RX1 shape + selfie screen & lots of lens choices

  • @paulhigginsphotography
    @paulhigginsphotography ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice review chaps! I jumped from M43 to Sony and was going to just get a second hand A7Riii, but on seeing this I started out with the A7C. My only mistake was not getting the 28-60mm kit lens. I've got one second hand now and love it. I also have the A7Riii too. It's a great combination - same battery. The A7C is my take everywhere camera and the A7Riii for more Pro stuff!

  • @abdulrhmanqotb9408
    @abdulrhmanqotb9408 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I've watched all your videos - they're great! I need a camera for indoor teaching (whiteboard and me standing). My budget allows for the Sony a7 III (€1150), a7C (€1400), or ZV-E10 (€650). Which, with what lens, would be best? Or should I just use my iPhone 15 Pro?
    Thanks!

  • @brunofalcone9979
    @brunofalcone9979 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If the lens is sharper than the other Sony 28-70 kit lens, as DPReview seems to imply. this camera is amazing and will be great for the average user who is looking for general/travel FF camera but doesn't want much size. Let's wait for more detailed lens reviews.

  • @MrSwaggernaut83
    @MrSwaggernaut83 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had written this thing off entirely but after watching this and hearing a less spec oriented perspective, I'm realizing I was probably too harsh after having has expectations of ANYTHING be inflated by the R5, R6, and a7S3. Good video!

  • @danielbowden5610
    @danielbowden5610 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How would this stack up against the Panasonic Lumix GH5? Ok its compact but what about the video quality? The gh5 looks amazing

  • @April_idk
    @April_idk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just can't find a reason to get this over an a7II. Anyone that's half a photographer won't be interested in the kit lenses anyway, so it comes down to some really small things and this camera only wins if you're looking for small. Which would be fine if I weren't mounting 135 mm 1.4's on it, which just makes it a weird thing to hold on to.

  • @Daddandan
    @Daddandan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    cheer up, cheer up everyone. The pandemic will end at the end of the day, and lets embrace sunshine altogether.

  • @timmytakemefishin6336
    @timmytakemefishin6336 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey guys I've watched a lot of your reviews and have gathered a lot of great info! I love your reviews especially the best and worst of 2020 that you guys got drunk in, us Aussies love getting drunk!😁🤪 I am a bit confused as I am a total noob and had pretty much decided to go buy the A7C! I just watched a review on the A7C by Tony and Chelsea and the auto focus failed a fair bit, is this a real issue for me as I will be filming a lot of fishing videos?? Thanks guys!!👍👍

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      filming fishing videos? A7SIII should do a great job, I had some hard time with AF while filming fast flying rc airplanes but otherwise AF is among the best, do you need the camera to be waterproof?

    • @timmytakemefishin6336
      @timmytakemefishin6336 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No it doesn't need to be waterproof, well i hope it doesn't anyway!😉 I will be definitely trying to keep it out of the water but it might get splashed a little bit!

  • @giac01
    @giac01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is really a missed opportunity to take on oly/fuji, for having a cute (maybe that's what the c stands for). small camera which is fun to use whilst travelling/street photog. The lack of dials/custom buttons seems to impact how fun this camera would be to use... Basically give us a fuji camera with the alpha mount :p

  • @olayemiosanyin6150
    @olayemiosanyin6150 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice review. Please what camera/kit did you use in shooting this video?

  • @llr3zall151
    @llr3zall151 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looking at the design (rangefinder style, silver top plate and exposure dial?!), it feels like Sony is going for Fujifilm fans that want a full frame sensor! Right?

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      makes sense, going from aps-c to full frame is a big deal, but this was overdue anyway as a6XXX body uses same lens mount as full frame so it was about time Sony stuck FF sensor in there, I think we are lucky they fit IBIS in this smaller body 💪

  • @daisukevideo
    @daisukevideo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The a7c is a good camera! I also have that camera. I'm excited because it's so light and compact. This video was very interesting! I will come to play again. With love from Japan :)

  • @stevengao8345
    @stevengao8345 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for this nice video, did u use Sony a7C camera to shoot this episode of video ? thanks

  • @ArturoTabera
    @ArturoTabera 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    11:40 I was thinking the "c" stands for cor... I'll see myself out. Thanks!

  • @ReefDudes
    @ReefDudes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I currently use an a6500 for my channel. Do you think the 7C is worth upgrading too for video/vlog/content creation?

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      absolutely worth it = FF sensor/huge battery/selfie screen all in similarly sized
      body sounds like a major upgrade

    • @ReefDudes
      @ReefDudes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mirrorlessny I was afraid you were going to say that! Love my a6500 but FF has been tempting me.. just hard to justify if its a big enough upgrade over the current setup :) thanks!

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReefDudes then go all the way up A7S3, you do low light videos yes? I did low light test recently a7iii (similar to a7c) vs a6600(similar to a6500) vs A7S3.......also A7S3 finally gets improved stabilization so handheld video will be smoother

  • @HSNG10
    @HSNG10 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Over here, the a7C is launched slightly cheaper than the a7III, and that makes it compelling for those looking for the lightest FF kit for travel. The new AF and colour compared to the a7iii are strong points. For those looking for compact FF, we would be willing to overlook some of the ergonomics.

  • @simontrezise8495
    @simontrezise8495 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The EVF is a major flaw by the sound of it. It's one part of a camera that they can't get wrong, because you're using it all the time. At least, I am!

  • @CriticalTechReviews
    @CriticalTechReviews 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Emo Chris has it right, I really needed this to have 4k60 and less rolling shutter to be compelling. When there's enough light for the tiny sensor, I find myself shooting with my iPhone (that had 4k60 four years ago), instead of my A6300. The bad EVF and worse LCD resolution, along with poor input methods and custom buttons, makes this sound equally as frustrating as my A6300. Hopefully they fix all this next gen, I love the size and shape of it.

  • @dirkstadil8621
    @dirkstadil8621 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes, it's a small body and the kit-lens is also small. But if you want better glass, it becomes large and heavy anyway and then you have to balance it with this small body.

  • @RCruz
    @RCruz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This is exactly the review, and exactly the camera I was looking for. Something lightweight, but pretty powerful and capable. I’m absolutely willing to sacrifice some of the niceties of other cameras for that lighter weight, not to mention solid auto focus. Will most likely be finally upgrading (from Canon 5Dmkiii)!

    • @mirrorlessny
      @mirrorlessny 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      great for travel, btw Sigma 28-70 is the lightest mid-range f2.8 zoom

  • @bdsattern
    @bdsattern 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Out of the half dozen reviews on the new Sony a7C I've watched so far, I like your take the best, especially the closing thoughts on who this particlar camera may appeal to. I have an a7riii and a smaller street rig that let's me make use my existing lenses sounds ideal. The a7C immediatlly reminded me a lot of the Panasonic GX series too and it's good to hear someone else confirm that -- my current 'small' camera is a GX9 and I've been on the fence about upgrading it because I love the accmpanying Leica lenses so much. The a7C may be a strong contender now.
    P.S. If I had to critique anything about your latest videos it would be this -- you'd both benefit from upgading your dad-fashion style. No offense meant, most of us men of a certain struggle in that department. Cheers.

  • @AlgisKemezys
    @AlgisKemezys 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys are such stars of the camera today.

  • @nikolaslykos5982
    @nikolaslykos5982 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another spot-on review from "the guys", with pluses & minuses and great alternative suggestions. Don't know why, but their reviews are the only ones convincing me to be totally unbiased, even when I do not fully agree. All others seem to have some sort of well [or not so well] hidden agenda. Cheers!

  • @antant06
    @antant06 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice comparison! I'm an a7iii user and recently have been missing the candybar design of the a6000.

  • @artmaltman
    @artmaltman 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about a video on the specific real world autofocus differences between A7C/A7R4 "real time tracking" vs A7R3/A73?

  • @tomd4748
    @tomd4748 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You fixing that skew using the photoshop tilt shift? I never see anybody shooting a ts lens in any video where they're shooting at extreme angles.

  • @Collin2377
    @Collin2377 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bought the Sony A7III a week ago and never used it. I am planning to return it because I heard a lot of them will get a broken shutter. Now I am thinking to get the A7C but I heard it doesn’t have such a good image stabilization. I don’t know what to do.

  • @PaulGPixelBike
    @PaulGPixelBike 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing shots, Chris. You can just about taste sadness in that man's eyes at 1:44.

  • @JessDemant
    @JessDemant 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've had the Sony A7c for a while for photography and it's fallen more and more to my liking as time goes on, so I actually no longer use my Sony A9 and consider selling it.
    The size is perfect for me and I love that the viewfinder puts in the side of the camera as I prefer that way of photographing. For the viewfinder I have bought an eyecup, and now the viewfinder has become really good to work with.
    I absolutely love the Color Science, and now I often only photograph in jpg.
    My only downside with the camera is that the LCD screen could well be more high resolution, but it is still possible to work with in most situations.
    Regarding the smaller number of buttons and wheels on the camera compared to, for example, Sony A9, it is not a problem for me as I switched the buttons and wheels that are to the ones I use the most. I always use focus tracking, so I do not need a button / wheel to move focus around with, as I just lay the focus point with focus -tracking on the subject that should be in focus and then I can move the subject where I want in the viewfinder or on the screen. I think it's much faster that way too.
    Many greetings
    Jess

  • @rubenzen
    @rubenzen 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m coming from a a7 mark 1. Should I wait for the mark iv? Main thing is photography and creating videocourses. Please advice! 🙏🏼

  • @winstonllamas5163
    @winstonllamas5163 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You guys are great. One of the best hires DPReview has ever done (and by extension, Amazon). Keep up the great work!

  • @CalMukumoto
    @CalMukumoto 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have an A7rIV, and I went for the Fuji x100v as my walk-around camera in early 2020. I just picked up the Sony A7C; I think I like it better since I have some compact primes. The jury is still out. I do love the Fuji x100v.

  • @TristanCourt
    @TristanCourt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh cool, you're from Calgary too?! subscribed! 🤣 Thanks for the review, been looking for a new camera to film my skit comedies on, thinking this might be a winner!

    • @dpreview
      @dpreview  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not a bad choice at all!
      Jordan @ DPReview TV

  • @campa_t
    @campa_t 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I heard that when you attach an oss lens to this camera the ibis turns off insead of complementing the optical stabilization. Is this true for both photos and videos?