Small detail is how the Doctor reacted when he thought Ruby was going for 2150 which was where the Dalek Invasion of Earth was set and cheered up when she added a 6 after.
Funny thing, 2150 is the year of the Dalek Invasion on the Peter Cushing movies, in the show the year is never specified, Ian and The Doctor find and old calendar with the year 2164, but up to that point the invasion had been going on for a long time, I think they later mention it has been like that for the last decade.
I would kill for a story set in that original 2160s Dalek Invasion timeline, where the Doctor goes up against the OG silver and blue Daleks, but can't fully stop them to keep the timeline intact.
Seeing the TARDIS have some much momentum and kinetic energy in this era is so thrilling, it's kind of hard to pinpoint exactly why, but it always gets me excited when this happens. Very cool to see!
I just love seeing the TARDIS fly, especially out of the vortex, but I don't think we've ever seen the TARDIS exiting the vortex like that (except for the TV movie) so that's awesome.
Money well spent so far. pretty sure disney only funded the marketing but since the BBC (I think its still the BBC) no longer has to make that expense they can put more money into CGI.
@@rigellhupp8327 Disney funded them, but individual production choices aren't made directly by them. However having a big injection of money from Disney certainly raises the possibilities of much better CGI on the whole
The CGI and sound department, no joke, are the very best, Doctod Who has ever had. We've never really seen the Tardis have this much momentum and energy, and its blowing me away. I really hope the CGI department sees this because its incredible. I do like classic materialisations, but this just adds so much more energy, the way it crashes and spins. The way it surfs and reacts to the vortex. It feels alive, and was something missing from any other era. The Tardis actually feels like a proper spaceship, and moves the way we would always fly our tardis toys as children, spinning them around and flying through our living rooms. Also, trust me, get some good headphones, crank up the volume, and just listen to the Tardis. The sounds are hetter than ever, with bassy machinery whirring and creaking like an old submarine. I may sound stupid, but it sounds bigger on the inside. The way there is now a slight whirring sound under the materialsition sound, or how the tardis groans, especially in episods 2, makes it sound so much better. Ah, its perfect
This was an awesome shot, I really want to see the Tardis flying around more. I remember there was this CGI artist (i cant remember their name off the top of my head) but they had a really cool concept of it travelling through space and time. And this feels really similar to that. Hope they explore this more.
That's the one. I did see his work on his channel from the Jodie era. If he isn't doing work this time around, I hope they take inspiration from him because his work was awesome.
I think with every new Tardis interior we get we need at least one episode that spends a lot of time inside the Tardis to show it off. Like I Love the Gmod Tardis modding scene and the more we know the more they have to work with to make cool stuff. I would have a go myself but I ain't got the time.
@@mistamysteriuh The TARDIS only does the flying in thing when it's crashing or the something is wrong with it, or the pilot is being reckless, like the Red Nose Day special, Wild Blue Yonder, and to an extent, the Christmas Invasion. The TARDIS has landed normally in the 60th specials and in S14E0 & 2
@@NatrollJM I forget which episode - but there’s a Dalek cameo in flux early on in the series and holy shit it’s bad. the colour the texture are all off, so are the proportions, when the heads turned so did the whole neck, there was no glow or distortion under the dalek as the levitated, this list goes on. Shadows were the least of our problems hahaha
Russell said recently that time for vfx is the main reason for the huge gap between airing and end of filming. Which, given the results, and the amount of blatantly rushed cgi we've had in film and tv recently, was really good to hear
Can't say it wowed me more than stuff from Capaldi or Jodie era as space shots go - probably elevated expectations when people tell you the show's accountant is now "richer than God" because it's not BBC budgeting. Is it one of those 'you need an 8k tv the size of a wall to appreciate the difference' situations?
No I also thought it was mid. Also I don't know if its just me, and they did this during the recent specials too where its like, crashing onboard and then it basically goes to a standstill quickly like it was paused. It just feels cheaper to me like the the landing has no weight, I know the TARDIS essentially has no weight but you only ever saw it fly this way if it was crashing or he used a special mode of flying like with the "Runaway Bride" episode so they have established this already. Not my fault for not liking it, its just Disney's bad take on it and their "new CGI". If Boom is bad (Moffats only episode this season) I am officially done with the show. I can't possibly imagine they start breaking into song about a landmine but who knows at this point.
The CGI is incredible, yet I miss it when the TARDIS' takeoff and landing was an event, accompanied by the wind, the lightbulb pulsating and the slow dematerialisation effect taking place... Yes, it wasn't as graphically impressive, but it was serious, spectacular and somewhat magical. The flying blue box just lacks gravity in my opinion.
@@shemdellashemygd29 heavily doubt thats all disney does with drwho, when disney does deals they dont just license so they can market it they take something more
yeah but it was probably really tricky for them to do and honestly it does look uncanny but it's definitely way better than it would've been had they used CGI babies
I've seen reviewers grasping at straws trying to defend the show, one article spoke about how it subverted expectations by having the doctor, get this, STAND STILL. Amazing.
It's funny, because this is amazing, but then minutes later you see the babies and suddenly it's like being back to the VFX from 2005, same with the music notes in the next episode, really takes you out of it.
the tardis flying is really cool and i love it i just hope we don't lose the classic materialisation where it fades in and out because that is just so iconic
Just rewatched the TV movie literally seconds ago for the first time in... a while, and this is how the Tardis does it in that. (There's a lot of stuff in that movie that Russell kept), so I assume this is how it's always meant to have been, and now he has the money to show it.
@@Blakesedit horendous. This really feels full of plot holes man. How many times was the tardis cloned ? I mean that must mean there are hundreds of copies still alive on several Tardis around the universe and time
Yeah I very much noticed how in ep.1 it got significantly better than the 60th specials which were a minor blip after the quite visually impressive 13th Doctor era
I like it but what this doesn’t have that the old 2000 and even the 80s cgi had was intense blur. It may have been from the poor quality of television then but it made the lack of intense detail feel more real and fast. While here it feels unfinished to me
Ι thought the title was sarcastic, expected some bad green screen shenanigans but it's decent. But then again uk made Harry potter they can't go wrong with cgi
@@BlaireBlaireBlaire sir/ma'an you misunderstood my point let me explain. My hypothesis is that there's a monopoly when it comes to cgi in the uk so the company who was hired for potter was also hired for Dr who, so in conclusion the result is flawless.
@@mulmareun nah. im from the uk and we have many many many badly done cgi things, literally including doctor who. doctor who is known in part for cheesy cgi and during jodies time terribly fake looking cgi. you just see only the good popular things from the uk because the bad stuff doesnt make it to the wider mass/other countries
@@BlaireBlaireBlaire that's the case cause I'm not into Sci fi films and series. My favorite uk tv products are misfits(yeah it's Sci fi but good one) and the inbetweeners
VFX improved because Disney is now part of funding the show so they can be allowed by the BBC to show it around the world while it’s only shown on BBC in UK
the best thing about doctor who was how they used so much practical effects this shot it cool with it but they overuse cgi in alot of other parts of the new season
The space station was real. All the mechanisms to make the ship work were real. They had to use puppeteers for the baby's push chairs. The TARDIS is always practical. Except for shots like this which makes sense. The bogey man was practical. All the instruments were obviously real in TDC. the tardis lights when the maestro took over the tardis was in real time, they built their own quarry for boom and the Ambulance device was practical. The meep & the wrarth warriors was even practical so was the arms of David Tennant and spooky bill and his family controlled by a remote control and puppeteers, jimbo was practical controlled by puppeteers again. Of course the tardis is practical in 73 yards. Clearly practical effects are the priority of this new era.
I mean, it does look great, but aside from that one shot with the dinosaur (and the fact every episode is now in UHD, not just Revolution of the Daleks and The Power of the Doctor) I've not seen much that isn't similar to what was achieved in the Chibnall years.
There’s just something so exciting about seeing the TARDIS transition so smoothly from the vortex to local space - first time it’s been visualised since the TV Movie and boy does it look good! 🥹
@@BlaireBlaireBlaire there’s a big difference between editing and vfx. Firstly you said it was ai which is just double wrong so good job on that one. It is a computer generated image. That’s CGI. Sit down and shut up.
Can't say I'm a fan of the TARDIS landing and moving forward instead of materializing, that's too big of a departure for me. But I do like the colorful vortex and how fast the TARDIS feels
Im on matt smith now,ill probably try a season of capaldi definitely not watching foster or this abomination.these are not the doctor and not what the chatacter is.
i have to admit, i'm not a fan of the newer cgi. ever since capaldi left it's all felt too... glossy. like yeah, it might be technically more impressive but i feel like it always feels a little out of place and a bit distracting. the focus should be on the character writing and plots, not the fancy sfx.
Best places to start are Series 1 (2005), Series 5 (2010) or Season 1 (2024) (including Christmas special from 2023). If you want to have a really great experience, I recommend to just start at Series 1 in 2005 :)
Anyone else absolutely love how violent and erratic the tardis has landed recently?! Think there’s some foreshadowing to the tardis getting old maybe ?
Yes the transition was good, but the actual style of the series is very goofy, not serious and the cgi looks fake, which it is obviously, but some cgi looks a lot better than others. Like with most tv and movie cgi lately, it’s going backwards, instead of forward.
Was all going well till the space babies appeared. The TARDIS and space shots looks great, but everything else, not so much. Also why can’t the TARDIS just land normally??
@shemdellashemygd29 the episode has a bunch of talking babies that the cgi doesn't work with, the monster was made of snot and they save the day by making the ship fast them out of orbit. I thought it was awful. We're all entitled to our own opinions tho.
Space babies wasn't the greatest episode by any stretch of the imagination but it wasn't horrible and I really enjoyed the devil's chord so I disagree with you when it comes to writing quality I think it's still decent and I think boom will be really good because Moffat always has the best episodes.
I really don't think it's that "woke" now they had a non-binary villain but they really didn't make a huge deal out of it they mentioned it one time and didn't mention it again because it didn't need to be mentioned again I think the star beast was a much worse example of unnecessarily shoehorning a political message in there for no reason but the devil's chord wasn't too bad in my opinion.
The CGI is maybe the only thing worth praising in this new era of Doctor Who. The series has undoubtedly made a move towards optics and spectacle instead of good writing. I think people forget that the lack of expensive sets and special effects in the Tennant/golden era of the show forced the writers to be resourceful and rely on intriguing characters and plotlines instead. It didn't matter that the visuals weren't perfect because the stories WERE. This new Disney plus era truly has some of the worst writing/acting I've seen from the BBC and this is from a genuine fan of the show. Don't let the illusion of spectacle distract you from Russel T Davie's massacre of the Doctor Who franchise.
![MV วิถีชีวิตใต้ - ผา อัยย๊ะ [Official MV HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nODlkOUu9B0/mqdefault.jpg)
Small detail is how the Doctor reacted when he thought Ruby was going for 2150 which was where the Dalek Invasion of Earth was set and cheered up when she added a 6 after.
That is a really good little detail
Funny thing, 2150 is the year of the Dalek Invasion on the Peter Cushing movies, in the show the year is never specified, Ian and The Doctor find and old calendar with the year 2164, but up to that point the invasion had been going on for a long time, I think they later mention it has been like that for the last decade.
@@space-time-hoboso basically still 2150
I would kill for a story set in that original 2160s Dalek Invasion timeline, where the Doctor goes up against the OG silver and blue Daleks, but can't fully stop them to keep the timeline intact.
@@chrispy3369Check out the Big Finish audio "Masters of Earth". Plays with that exact idea.
Seeing the TARDIS have some much momentum and kinetic energy in this era is so thrilling, it's kind of hard to pinpoint exactly why, but it always gets me excited when this happens. Very cool to see!
I think it’s cause it gives her the sense of travelling, nearly dancing in fact, amongst energy as opposed to simply riding currents.
If only the episodes were not trash
@@Zejoant You didn't like Boom?
@@Rocksteady72a it was okay. 50000 billion times better than the previous 2 episodes but still nothing special.
@@Zejoant What's your definition of special? I thought it was pretty unique - hard to point to a similar episode
I just love seeing the TARDIS fly, especially out of the vortex, but I don't think we've ever seen the TARDIS exiting the vortex like that (except for the TV movie) so that's awesome.
There is something about a flying police box that is just beautiful.
@@JSP_1147agreed
The Christmas invasion 2006
Day of the doctor. The war doctor's tardis exited the vortex in the "gallifrey stands" scene.
@@JeDast We only saw it from the outside perspective. I meant seeing her in the vortex and exiting from there.
Probably Disney money being spent. I did notice the improved cgi in the trailers.
Disney's money ONLY goes to Marketing. BBC secures rights and other deals. The executive producers are still responsible for the budget.
Money well spent so far. pretty sure disney only funded the marketing but since the BBC (I think its still the BBC) no longer has to make that expense they can put more money into CGI.
Remember, disney also made She Hulk and all the recent Marvel movies. Its not just money
@@rigellhupp8327 Disney funded them, but individual production choices aren't made directly by them. However having a big injection of money from Disney certainly raises the possibilities of much better CGI on the whole
That’s actually improved? I guess it is Disney
The CGI and sound department, no joke, are the very best, Doctod Who has ever had. We've never really seen the Tardis have this much momentum and energy, and its blowing me away. I really hope the CGI department sees this because its incredible. I do like classic materialisations, but this just adds so much more energy, the way it crashes and spins. The way it surfs and reacts to the vortex. It feels alive, and was something missing from any other era. The Tardis actually feels like a proper spaceship, and moves the way we would always fly our tardis toys as children, spinning them around and flying through our living rooms. Also, trust me, get some good headphones, crank up the volume, and just listen to the Tardis. The sounds are hetter than ever, with bassy machinery whirring and creaking like an old submarine. I may sound stupid, but it sounds bigger on the inside. The way there is now a slight whirring sound under the materialsition sound, or how the tardis groans, especially in episods 2, makes it sound so much better. Ah, its perfect
Its perfect, perfect, down to the last minute details.
That's Disney money for you
This looks fuckin horrible lol
@@-pROvAK cap
@@-pROvAK there's nothing to be ashamed about if you need to go to spec-savers mate, go on you can do it lil buddy!
This was an awesome shot, I really want to see the Tardis flying around more. I remember there was this CGI artist (i cant remember their name off the top of my head) but they had a really cool concept of it travelling through space and time. And this feels really similar to that. Hope they explore this more.
Are you thinking of John Smith? He has a video called dematerialisation that’s pretty cool
John Smith? If so then he actually did the Jodie intro and some visuals for her era
That's the one. I did see his work on his channel from the Jodie era. If he isn't doing work this time around, I hope they take inspiration from him because his work was awesome.
John Smith
I think with every new Tardis interior we get we need at least one episode that spends a lot of time inside the Tardis to show it off. Like I Love the Gmod Tardis modding scene and the more we know the more they have to work with to make cool stuff. I would have a go myself but I ain't got the time.
I will certainly miss the classic dematerialisation effect :(
It's still here it just doesn't always get used
I think it’s still around, its just this one shot
It's just upgraded. If you look closely, it's still materializing when it lands, it just also has a kinetic energy to it now!
@@Rocksteady72a yea but that's what I don't like about it, it was better when it just faded but now they really gotta add some flying animation to it
@@mistamysteriuh The TARDIS only does the flying in thing when it's crashing or the something is wrong with it, or the pilot is being reckless, like the Red Nose Day special, Wild Blue Yonder, and to an extent, the Christmas Invasion. The TARDIS has landed normally in the 60th specials and in S14E0 & 2
John Smith's CGI from series 11 to series 13 was just as good.
John Smith’s regeneration energy VFX was mesmerisingly beautiful.
(Let’s not mention the Daleks tho)
@@Doctor_What63 I have no idea why people hated the daleks so much other than "the shadows werent good enough!!!!1111"
Bro his name is Math Smith. John Smith was 10th doctor when he wasn't a timelord anymore
@@NatrollJM I forget which episode - but there’s a Dalek cameo in flux early on in the series and holy shit it’s bad.
the colour the texture are all off, so are the proportions, when the heads turned so did the whole neck, there was no glow or distortion under the dalek as the levitated, this list goes on. Shadows were the least of our problems hahaha
@@Doctor_What63 Are you referring to the scene where they fly through that alien forest?
My favourite usage of CGI in the new episodes is the tardis flying away from the exploding ship in wild blue yonder
Yes, agreed best use of CGI indeed
I pointed this out when I first watched the episode
"2... 1... 5... 0... (realizes) 'Oh fuck!... Omg thank you so much for the 6...' 😌"
I like to think they did that on purpose to get us thinking about The Dalek Invasion of Earth
Russell said recently that time for vfx is the main reason for the huge gap between airing and end of filming. Which, given the results, and the amount of blatantly rushed cgi we've had in film and tv recently, was really good to hear
Can't say it wowed me more than stuff from Capaldi or Jodie era as space shots go - probably elevated expectations when people tell you the show's accountant is now "richer than God" because it's not BBC budgeting.
Is it one of those 'you need an 8k tv the size of a wall to appreciate the difference' situations?
No I also thought it was mid. Also I don't know if its just me, and they did this during the recent specials too where its like, crashing onboard and then it basically goes to a standstill quickly like it was paused. It just feels cheaper to me like the the landing has no weight, I know the TARDIS essentially has no weight but you only ever saw it fly this way if it was crashing or he used a special mode of flying like with the "Runaway Bride" episode so they have established this already. Not my fault for not liking it, its just Disney's bad take on it and their "new CGI". If Boom is bad (Moffats only episode this season) I am officially done with the show. I can't possibly imagine they start breaking into song about a landmine but who knows at this point.
That Disney budget🔥
Yep & Sony budget
That’s Disney + budget for you
You can tell Murray good is definitely back, that nostalgic feeling hits when you hear those trumpets roar!
The reaction to the doctor when he thought she wants to visit to the Daleks invasion. FUCK! 😂
This is so impressive for Doctor Who, but nothing will ever be more impressive than the opening to Trial of a Time Lord.
The CGI is incredible, yet I miss it when the TARDIS' takeoff and landing was an event, accompanied by the wind, the lightbulb pulsating and the slow dematerialisation effect taking place... Yes, it wasn't as graphically impressive, but it was serious, spectacular and somewhat magical. The flying blue box just lacks gravity in my opinion.
Lacks what? What’s gravity?
I'm enjoying this mixture of flight and the shots we get of it being that wind noise and light. I think it's a good balance.
@@billywhizz09I think he mistyped mavity
I think in more serious cases where discretion is needed he will pilot the TARDIS in a more sensible serious fashion.
@@billywhizz09 mavity
Ngl I was expected the title to be sarcastic and then I remembered they have Disney money
You can thank Disney for that budget money
Source? Apart from distributing the show on D+, don't think they have any other input.
@@ACtheLegend fym source? you think they rebranded to a new show and got a massive deal with disney and got no money for it...?
@@BlaireBlaireBlaire the bad wolf producers controls the money not Disney. Disney pay for the marketing
@@shemdellashemygd29 heavily doubt thats all disney does with drwho, when disney does deals they dont just license so they can market it they take something more
Interesting how more and more the TARDIS has been doing that spinning into materialization instead of just appearing stationary
Oh I actually very much love his energy
The CGI looks impressive, great refresher from the recent Marvel stuff
It is a beautiful effect, watching the old girl dance through nebula like energy
If only the writing and characters were as good as the CGI
Glad someone said it
So we just aren’t gonna talk about the mouths of the babies?
oh yeah i noticed that, it’s not something i enjoyed and it looked really really janky
yeah but it was probably really tricky for them to do and honestly it does look uncanny but it's definitely way better than it would've been had they used CGI babies
It's a better baby than Twilight 😂
aint that big of a deal + that isnt cgi its ai
It would be cool John Smith (fan VFX artist turned actual DW VFX artist) is behind this
Yeah too bad the show isn't
I've seen reviewers grasping at straws trying to defend the show, one article spoke about how it subverted expectations by having the doctor, get this, STAND STILL. Amazing.
@@bencastor9207 idk what money they paying to the reviewers but it best be a lot because that's almost impossible to say.
@@bencastor9207Lol That tells me everything I need to know about the current state of the show and the ones who try to defend it.
agree. im not even bother to watch
@@DeXter_0114 me neither
It's funny, because this is amazing, but then minutes later you see the babies and suddenly it's like being back to the VFX from 2005, same with the music notes in the next episode, really takes you out of it.
Yep like walking fat and burping bins. normal doctor who
the tardis flying is really cool and i love it i just hope we don't lose the classic materialisation where it fades in and out because that is just so iconic
Both are iconic
@@shemdellashemygd29 true also it was in 73 yards so it's obviously staying 🔥
Just rewatched the TV movie literally seconds ago for the first time in... a while, and this is how the Tardis does it in that. (There's a lot of stuff in that movie that Russell kept), so I assume this is how it's always meant to have been, and now he has the money to show it.
This was a much smoother camera shot of the time vortex than any shot of the time vortex in the Chibnall era where the camera was very shakey.
CGI QUALITY UP.
WRITING QUALITY OBLITERATED.
Each to their own. Each episode has been getting better and better
@@shemdellashemygd29 hows that finale feeling ? xD
@@shemdellashemygd29 you must , at least feel some sense of dissapointment from that dont lie
@@Blakesedit horendous.
This really feels full of plot holes man.
How many times was the tardis cloned ?
I mean that must mean there are hundreds of copies still alive on several Tardis around the universe and time
I thought the title was sarcastic and the video was going to be a joke. But I'm very impressed.
I must admit, it is impressive
Yeah I very much noticed how in ep.1 it got significantly better than the 60th specials which were a minor blip after the quite visually impressive 13th Doctor era
Ncutti is acing it!
I expected sarcasm but it’s actually good😂
Genuinely seems like there going to 15th slide landing the Tardis now
He done it normal at the end of space babies at the end of boom and the strat of 73 yards
that music goes hard
LOOKS GREAT
I like it but what this doesn’t have that the old 2000 and even the 80s cgi had was intense blur. It may have been from the poor quality of television then but it made the lack of intense detail feel more real and fast. While here it feels unfinished to me
its like how i remember 10s era being like
Does look awesome
You do realise the tardis has 5 sides as it exits the vortex?
Ι thought the title was sarcastic, expected some bad green screen shenanigans but it's decent. But then again uk made Harry potter they can't go wrong with cgi
great logic! america made stranger things so every show must be good! because the country owns everything thats totally how it works!
@@BlaireBlaireBlaire sir/ma'an you misunderstood my point let me explain. My hypothesis is that there's a monopoly when it comes to cgi in the uk so the company who was hired for potter was also hired for Dr who, so in conclusion the result is flawless.
@@mulmareun nah. im from the uk and we have many many many badly done cgi things, literally including doctor who. doctor who is known in part for cheesy cgi and during jodies time terribly fake looking cgi. you just see only the good popular things from the uk because the bad stuff doesnt make it to the wider mass/other countries
@@BlaireBlaireBlaire that's the case cause I'm not into Sci fi films and series. My favorite uk tv products are misfits(yeah it's Sci fi but good one) and the inbetweeners
This is like 2012 level CGI at best.
That was such a nice VFX shot 😍
VFX improved because Disney is now part of funding the show so they can be allowed by the BBC to show it around the world while it’s only shown on BBC in UK
It’s still a bit jarring, but it has definitely improved.
the best thing about doctor who was how they used so much practical effects this shot it cool with it but they overuse cgi in alot of other parts of the new season
The space station was real. All the mechanisms to make the ship work were real. They had to use puppeteers for the baby's push chairs. The TARDIS is always practical. Except for shots like this which makes sense. The bogey man was practical. All the instruments were obviously real in TDC. the tardis lights when the maestro took over the tardis was in real time, they built their own quarry for boom and the Ambulance device was practical. The meep & the wrarth warriors was even practical so was the arms of David Tennant and spooky bill and his family controlled by a remote control and puppeteers, jimbo was practical controlled by puppeteers again. Of course the tardis is practical in 73 yards. Clearly practical effects are the priority of this new era.
I mean, it does look great, but aside from that one shot with the dinosaur (and the fact every episode is now in UHD, not just Revolution of the Daleks and The Power of the Doctor) I've not seen much that isn't similar to what was achieved in the Chibnall years.
It's funny because Disney's properties have HORRIBLE digital effects!
Yet it was produced by the BBC vfx team clearly know nothing about the show
There’s just something so exciting about seeing the TARDIS transition so smoothly from the vortex to local space - first time it’s been visualised since the TV Movie and boy does it look good! 🥹
real ones know that the past three seasons consistently looked even better than this
Why compare....
@@shemdellashemygd29 for fun
Can anyone tell me what the Doctor say after Ruby chooses the number 6? It sounds like "find the ..." something?
"Five numbers I like it!"
How much did they pay you
are you asking the video publisher or bad wolf?
Womp womp
I thought this video was satire at first.
I love this video so much and I love Doctor Who so much.
Uh huh. Now show the bit 50 seconds after this clip with the uncanny valley baby mouths.
In DWU they explained how it works
They're using facial tracking from the voice actors on top of a 3d model of the baby's face
thats ai not cgi.
@@BlaireBlaireBlaire mhm. And what do they use to generate that ai imagery? A computer perhaps??????
@@temerson2 "what do they use to edit a movie!?!?! a computer!?!?!? therefore cgi!!!" thats not how it works lol
@@BlaireBlaireBlaire there’s a big difference between editing and vfx. Firstly you said it was ai which is just double wrong so good job on that one. It is a computer generated image. That’s CGI. Sit down and shut up.
Can't say I'm a fan of the TARDIS landing and moving forward instead of materializing, that's too big of a departure for me. But I do like the colorful vortex and how fast the TARDIS feels
Normal tardis flying
Im on matt smith now,ill probably try a season of capaldi definitely not watching foster or this abomination.these are not the doctor and not what the chatacter is.
Bye bye fake fan
I feel like an old school dr who fan. Back in my day the practical models would cut to awfully rendered cgi. Don’t make em like they used to
It honestly looks like unreal engine
Ashame the episodes are shit
Stay delusional. Fake fan
i have to admit, i'm not a fan of the newer cgi. ever since capaldi left it's all felt too... glossy. like yeah, it might be technically more impressive but i feel like it always feels a little out of place and a bit distracting. the focus should be on the character writing and plots, not the fancy sfx.
You can have both good writing and good sfx.
@@CreepyNoodles69 sfx is sound effects, vfx is video effects
They need to focus on the writing .. stories .. not snot filled dialogue
Imagine complaining about a fun concept 😂 get a life
Less episodes + disney money I would guess
This wasn't really that much to write home about? It was pretty basic CGI for a pretty basic scene.
Yet has doctor who ever done it before....
shit probably took like 2 months to render 😂
great stuff mate
I donr care about CGI im here for the story
Going on like ruby's origin isn't interesting
All down to Disney. Sure as hell can't be the BBC.
Man thinks doctor who doesn't have a vfx team😂
@@shemdellashemygd29 Oh no they do. But the BBC team will always be better. Especially before Disney got involved
I've never seen anything related to doctor who .....
If anyone could help me to get started ,
How would you describe it in a few words?
Best places to start are Series 1 (2005), Series 5 (2010) or Season 1 (2024) (including Christmas special from 2023). If you want to have a really great experience, I recommend to just start at Series 1 in 2005 :)
@@BaronMartin Dont watch past the 11th doctor
Its because they started using Unreal Engine.
Too bad the writing is gone to shit :c
its literally been better then the last 2 doctors and we're only a couple eps in fym
@@BlaireBlaireBlairegood one
Its crazy I didn't think people wouldn't like god concepts. Like in classic who. Clearly not a fan then.
@@shemdellashemygd29 they would suddenly like the writing if the doctor was a straight white man though i bet with 90% of the people complaining lol
Anyone else absolutely love how violent and erratic the tardis has landed recently?! Think there’s some foreshadowing to the tardis getting old maybe ?
How about the horrible pilot?
@@gamerboiiiiiii
what?
@@sidicle6537the Doctor has always been a horrible pilot trying to operate a six-crew vehicle so they probably made it more prominent
Man this is NOT doctor who lol
Yes it is. Fake fan
A pity the rest is totally irredeemable.
Stay delusional fake fan
It’s been amazing for about 6 years sorry to be a downer but this isn’t new
6 years and no shot like this .
@@shemdellashemygd29 there have been many if not better shots than this
Yeah but the writing nowhere close to Moffat Era 5-10
Yes the transition was good, but the actual style of the series is very goofy, not serious and the cgi looks fake, which it is obviously, but some cgi looks a lot better than others. Like with most tv and movie cgi lately, it’s going backwards, instead of forward.
Yet the episode was promoted as fun and camp..
I have been pleasantly surprised with the new season
Was all going well till the space babies appeared.
The TARDIS and space shots looks great, but everything else, not so much.
Also why can’t the TARDIS just land normally??
Learn to have fun. That what the episode was promoted as.
@@shemdellashemygd29 This is singlehandedly the most moronic comment I've ever read
@@shemdellashemygd29 that’s got to be the most moronic comment I’ve read in a long time well done
@@shemdellashemygd29 Mhm. Personally, I had a big fun watching Space Babies, and The Devil's Chord. What a fun time!
I didn't know if this video was sarcastic or not until I read the comments. Looks shite
Stay delusional
Thank you I wad like wtf is everyone glazing about, looks worse than the cgi in jodies era
The 2005 time vortex looked more impressive than this shit
Genuinly tho, this was the worst doctor who episode of all time, i have lost all interest in the show and wish it ended with the 12th
Imagine complaining about what the show always does. Start with the most insane concept. Clearly know nothing about the show then
@shemdellashemygd29 the episode has a bunch of talking babies that the cgi doesn't work with, the monster was made of snot and they save the day by making the ship fast them out of orbit. I thought it was awful. We're all entitled to our own opinions tho.
CGI budget got a huge upgrade.
And all it cost was any semblance of quality in the writing.
You do realise RTD wrote this and not Chibnall? You don't have to pretend to hate the writing anymore silly American 😂
Space babies wasn't the greatest episode by any stretch of the imagination but it wasn't horrible and I really enjoyed the devil's chord so I disagree with you when it comes to writing quality I think it's still decent and I think boom will be really good because Moffat always has the best episodes.
You should have realised that every show that received a massive upgrade in looks sold its soul to the WOKE devil.
Also, I would have loved if we had both the good scripting back in the good old days and the CGI. But well, that seems to be the price to pay.
I really don't think it's that "woke" now they had a non-binary villain but they really didn't make a huge deal out of it they mentioned it one time and didn't mention it again because it didn't need to be mentioned again I think the star beast was a much worse example of unnecessarily shoehorning a political message in there for no reason but the devil's chord wasn't too bad in my opinion.
Looks great! Shame about the plot though.
So your not into god concepts? Bye.
The CGI is maybe the only thing worth praising in this new era of Doctor Who. The series has undoubtedly made a move towards optics and spectacle instead of good writing. I think people forget that the lack of expensive sets and special effects in the Tennant/golden era of the show forced the writers to be resourceful and rely on intriguing characters and plotlines instead. It didn't matter that the visuals weren't perfect because the stories WERE. This new Disney plus era truly has some of the worst writing/acting I've seen from the BBC and this is from a genuine fan of the show. Don't let the illusion of spectacle distract you from Russel T Davie's massacre of the Doctor Who franchise.
Looks like a bad videogame
Stay delusional
@@shemdellashemygd29 It literally looks like a bad videogame. But you keep lying to yourself, chap🙂
21,506
That felt very hollow
Improved special effects is always at the cost of something else...
NGL, title feels like clickbait.
All it is is Disney
Womp womp
@@shemdellashemygd29 exactly, better with the original English show
What a shame absolutely everything else about Doctor Who is utter SHITE
Fake fan stay delusional
Yes, too bad the pandering and wokeness have increased.
Clearly know nothing about the show
Honestly I preferred when CGI sucked and writing was good thanks Disney for ruining something so old so precious and so good
As visual design , I must say 10/10 but writing is still worst as Chibnall's writing.