Heritage Rough Rider vs Ruger Wrangler : Budget Gun Battle!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ส.ค. 2024
- Here are two budget friendly Single Action Revolvers in 22 LR that we're going to take head to head and look at the pros and cons of both. Thanks to Gunzonedeals and Ruger for their help! #RugerWrangler #Roughrider #SingleAction22
✅Big thanks to Fiocchi USA for Supplying our ammunition!
Robbie Wheaton's TH-cam Channel: / robbiewheaton
Sportsman's Guide $20 off $100 or more purchase using SOOTCH
USCCA Affiliate Link: uscca.com/Sootch
Rubber Dummies 10% off "Sootch00" Code. Click Affiliate Link: www.rubberdumm...
Check out Getzone.com for the SootchZone to see exclusive content www.getzone.com/
Be a Team Sootch Minuteman: / sootch00
Hit the Like Button & Subscribe for more Fun Gun Reviews.
Thanks for watching~ Sootch00
Instagram: Sootch_00
Music is from Jingle Punks and Epidemic Sounds Royalty Free Music through the Fullscreen Network. Used with permission.
I bough a Ruger Super Wrangler recently because I had a distinct lack of revolvers in my gun collection. I love the corrosion resistance of the Cerakote, the adjustable rear sights, the better frame material, the simplicity of the two-click hammer, the superior safety (transfer bar), and the pins instead of screws. It will be a good plinker and trainer for my kids.
I've bought 4 Heritage Roughriders 3 were given as gifts. I added blue Locktite to all of them and haven't had any problems with the screws backing out. I own many Rugers but, the Heritage is hard to beat at it's price point. The accuracy is amazing for a low priced gun! Having the safety has been a plus teaching my daughters to shoot. My Dad loves his and I bought the magnum cylinder for his with about $130 into the gun total.
I have a Heritage Rough Rider just like the one in this video. No, it certainly doesn’t have the fit and finish of the Ruger Wrangler. But for a $100 plinker you just can’t beat it. Plus, I just like the classic look of the Rough Rider more. Happy Independence Day to all my fellow 2A supporters! 🇺🇸
Aren't the Heritage in dual caliber $200, not $100?
@@jamesgretsch4894 Depends on your local market. In mine, the 6.5" barrel Rough Rider with both .22LR and .22 WMR cylinder with fixed sights runs $159.00 to $179.00. Dual cylinder with adjustable sights runs about $235.00, as does the steel frame / fixed sight Rough Rider.
@@jamesgretsch4894 I just got my .22 WMR cylinder separate for $30 bucks.
What! I had to pay $130
Have had a Rough Rider for at least 25 years and I am deadly accurate with it. The trigger is as good as any revolver I have ever shot.
Barrel length? 🙂
@@cleekmaker00 six inch
I have the 4 and the 6 inch barrel rough riders now. 6in my first one, seems way more powerful then the 4in especially obviously with the mag cylinder. I highly recommend the 6in.
The 6" actually has lower muzzle velocity than the 4". You lose more gas pressure through the cylinder.@@BUZZKILLJRJR
I’ve had a Heritage for over 20 years now. I’ve carried it almost religiously in the woods during trapping season and deer season. Has never failed me as a dispatch weapon for trapping and with snake shot.
I've got a couple newer rough riders. Both fail to fire often. They don't make 'em like they used to!
@@mattschmitt9924 I can’t confirm on the new ones. My older one is so worn it’s turning purple lol.
@@bertpulaski2492 Keep running til the wheel falls out! Glad to hear you like it.
You also drink bud light and white claw
@@justinpennington7682 you’re the one trying to teach these college kids how to butt chug. Only problem is you used a 4” pvc pipe.
I've never owned the Wrangler so I can't give an opinion on it. But I do own the heritage and it is a very sweet shooter.
I can only speak for the Rough Rider, but my first gave me about 2,500 rounds before I had to replace the main spring, but that was a $20 fix and now it's back to normal. I always put them over whenever someone at the range asks, I liked mine so much I've bought 2 more since.
How did you know you needed to replace the spring?
The Ruger just doesnt look as period accurate although im sure its great quality, i just think they took it too seriously. Heritage nailed it other than the safety.
Period accurate? A thumb safety is NOT period accurate.
@@stevethepirate8907 yeah i said that
@@stevethepirate8907rough riders have thumb safeties?
I have three Rough Riders. My 11yo daughter loves them. I've had one of them for about 15 years. I'm going to buy more.
I prefer the finish and the click stops when rotating the cylinder on the Rough Rider which makes unloading or ejecting brass easier. The 4 clicks...❤❤❤
I also like the safety on the Rough Rider for teaching or training.
I'm certain that the Wrangler is a good firearm. I just prefer the Rough Rider and i can't find justification for the price discrepancy.
FYI I'm pretty sure Zamak is also used in medical implants and it makes zero difference in rimfire. Heritage makes steel Rough Riders for locales with melting point laws.
Regardless of anything else, thanks for bringing more attention to great training and plinking revolvers that can reasonably serve as self defense with 22 WMR that are generally AFFORDABLE 😁 Happy Independence Day and have a blast 😎👍
I just commented above also on the Heritage being closer to "authentic" for those same reasons (as well as having wood stocks.) ;-)
I have a Diamondback Sidekick and a Heritage Rough Rider. I passed on the Wrangler because no .22WMR. I might pick one up now. BTW you can get the Rough Rider with a steel receiver. That's what mine is.
I custom, hand fit my Rough Rider wooden grips. I also always buy the 9 shot models.
I took mine to the belt sander at work and ground down the inside of the grips and mounted them back on. Grips were too fat
I own both. I actually own 1 Wrangler and 2 Rough Riders. The rough rider feels better and not cheap gimmicky ironically like the Ruger. Also really the only reason I own one more than the other is because the Rough Rider can slam fire 😉
You may not like the cerecote finish on the RUGER, but I have sold both of these guns at 2 different gun shops. The RUGER is much better quality, hands down.
I’ve slam fired the wrangler, and it worked, it’s just the hammer is a little stiff and is better with gloves.
@@thatsmytwocents4372 as a fan and owner of many Rugers, I have to say I disagree. The Heritage performs just as well as the Wrangler at nearly half the price.
I own both and between my two youngest children, we have fired 750+ rounds thru them….
Selling them is not shooting them, that's where the RR shines. Like someone else noted, the Ruger looks like a Mattel Fanner 50 toy revolver.@@thatsmytwocents4372
I am a lifelong Ruger fan. revolvers, bolt rifles, ARs. Not so much on their pistols, excepting the Mark series 22 pistols. I own 20 plus Ruger firearms. However, I bought a rough rider for a hundred bucks 6.5-inch barrel. 22/22 mag. I have been harvesting game. Squirrels, ground hogs, coons and an armadillo. I love this revolver. Very accurate. I went back and bought two more. A bird's head and a shorter barreled like the one I have. The bird's head is fun. can't hit anything farther than 10 paces. But i feel like I'm Doc Holiday when I wear it at the range. LOL. The short barrel is OK. much harder to shoot. The original revolver is up to a 20-kill count. I love shooting it. And it is very accurate. it is my official Squirrel hunt side arm. Yes, I hated the safety at first. Yes, it's ugly. But it works. and it's in the right place. I have acclimated it. I'm good. 10 stars. spend a hundred. You won't be sorry.
I wanted to buy the Roughrider because of the 22 mag cylinder but I couldn’t get past the safety and build quality. I ended up buying the Ruger and never looked back, I’m not crazy about the finish but I’ll probably buy add the super wrangler to my arsenal as soon as one comes into my shop.
Next up Diamondback Sidekick vs Ruger Wrangler vs Heritage Rough Rider?? I have all three and many Heritage Rough Riders. Great video Sootch, keep 'em coming.
I have two Rough riders (one plow & birds head) & one Wrangler. The screws always come loose on the Heritage! Had to lock tight them. Trigger spring goes also after many rounds. Light strikes. For $100 it’s just fine. Plus, very customizable from the Heritage store.
The Ruger is far better quality though. I have fired so many rounds through the Ruger I lost count. Zero problems. But it does cost more.
A Ruger is a forever gun. Ruger will stand behind their products forever and the rough rider is disposable. I still shoot my single six convertible bought in 1976 to this day with 0.0 issues and adjustable sights.
It is a case of you get what you pay for...we couldn't justify to ourselves the price of a single six for casual plinking, a .22 single action revolver shouldn't be an arm and a leg...yeah, the single six will run forever, but maybe we got lucky as our Heritage has been reliable, the screws not withstanding...back then we chose it over the Wrangler with the .22wmr cylinder the deciding factor...amazing that Ruger took so long to realize the Wrangler would sell better with two cylinders available...
My father has owned a stainless Single-Six since 1986. He's carried it hunting every year since then and I put thousands of rounds through it as a teenager. I'm currently making a new set of grips for it, as the decades of wear and tear are showing. He could just buy new grips, but he's worth the time to me.
@@adirondacker007 Great heritage, love hearing this
A wrangler is a forever gun? Lmao.
@@JohnPublic-dk7zdI have 1 ruger and 2 heritage. One of the rough riders was miss firing. Light primer strikes. I added tension to the main spring and slight adjustment to the cylinder stop. Most of the time it's the main spring. But I do like them. And 22mag is fun.
I love Rugers, but I have to give it to the Herritage..
Wrangler, hands down.
Or🤔 wrangler…hands up 😶
I have a colt and it's a great gun
@@holidayhouse03Clever bastard.
Rough rider hands down
I have a Ruger wrangler out of all the revolvers I have shot it has been the easiest and most reliable little plinker.
I owned a Rough Rider for 10 years had a few thousand rounds through it training new shooters. Absolutely loved it never an issue with it. Best value for the money! Great video as always thanks!
The Ruger is the better made revolver...but I own a few of each and enjoy them all...my heritage revolvers are more accurate than the wranglers though....
Great video. I have a 6 1/2 inch Rough Rider with both cylinders. Was very surprised hitting a 6 inch circle at 50 yards with 30gr wmr Hornady vmaxs. It was price that I bought it just to see. Only rimfire pistol I have. Many others. For many dollars less my Taraus 856 shoots just as well as my 640 Smith.
I can say, you CANNOT beat the service I received from Ruger on a GP100. That service is the deciding factor on my future purchases in firearms.
Your western hat and glasses reminded me of Bob Milek. God rest his soul.
A friend gave me a Heritage five years ago. I've put 3000 rounds through it and enjoy it a lot. At first couldn't hit anything with it, but can now hit a 10" plate at 25 yards every time. By far the best I can shoot any handgun I own. The finish is wearing off the pot metal parts and I had to replace a hand spring. No matter, I still love the thing.
It’s the Ruger Wrangler for me. Love mine!
The 22 LR also can chamber and shoot 22 Long and 22 Short w 22 CB Caps. And 22 Rat Shot.
The Super Wrangler Ruger with the 22 Magnum cylinder is versatile.
The Heritage cylinders are rebated which is nice, and the safety block allows dry fire practice practice
The Super Wrangler has countersunk chambers and can be dry fired also. I know, I just picked one up.
@@robb-kx6wu
Good to know. I see the Wrangler manual says dry firing is OK.
You can lighten the Rugers trigger significantly by removing the right grip panel and lifting the trigger spring arm over the retaining pin and resting it under. Only do one side of the spring as the trigger is dangerously light if you do both
HRR needs no mods, trigger is 'effin sweet from the factory.
I got a heritage rough Rider for Christmas Santa was nice he only paid 70 brand new and 30 for the 22 mag so 100.
I love it and I got to 22 magnum cylinder as well the safety is actually an amazing feature I think especially for the kid. I like the construction kind of reminds me of an old gun simple. I don't have a Ruger Wrangler im just saying i like the one i have haha
I will spend the extra and get the Ruger for the hammer forged barrel and I love the fact that you can turn the Ruger cylinder both ways for loading. I do wish the Ruger had the clicking when turning the cylinder. I have 3 Ruger singles already and have put a lot of rounds through them and believe the Wrangler will last my lifetime and have xlnt resale.
Sootch00 Very good video and very informative.you are right about the price point of the Heritage Rough Rider.We have both revolvers and enjoy shooting both of them.They seem to have their own identity.We find that the Rough Rider seems to be more accurate.Don't know if it is because the Rough rider has a 6.5 inch barrel compared to the Wrangler 4.6 inch barrel.Both are fun to plink with.Thanks again for taking the time to cover some of the simpler fire arms.
Great timing, the next gun I'm gonna get is a Heritage Rough Rider in Cerakote Gold; Gold like in the James Bond novel: "The Man With With Golden Gun". Which was a gold Single Action Army, and not that custom gun in the movie.
As much as I appreciate Rugers guns and customer service for a fun plinker I’d get the Heritage for the price and traditional look. For a trainer for new shooters I’d be interested in how stiff (weight) the hammer pull is.
Single action triggers are well known to be much lighter than double action, even in cheap .22 revolvers...the Heritage trigger is surprisingly good...don't own the Ruger but I'm sure it is just as good...double action .22s will always have a heavy trigger because the rim fire has to be hit firmly...
I bought a two tone silver Super Wrangler a few months back, shoots 22LR amazingly well and for more power, 22 Mag is a great option. Great little gun for ~$300. I put a fiber optic front sight on it that I had laying around extra for a Ruger MkIV, fits perfect.
Both are good choices for the money they are hard to beat the Ruger Single Six is by far the best choice but it’s the right choice between these two for the one you have both are good and both shoot well, the Heritage is neat in that there are lots of choices of grips from thier website and the 22 mag cylinders all inter change with all the different models they also have a 9 shot model which is my choice
The Super Wrangler is my favorite flavor. It has a steel receiver, not aluminum like the original. I love the original but the adjustable sights and extra cylinder of the Super are great enhancements.
I would be willing to spend more on the ruger
Great review(s), Ty. You present much to think about. Here in W Houston (TX) the Heritages are priced around $119.00 to $159.00, depending on the barrel length (and $50.00 extra for a mail-in Mag cylinder). The Wrangler, or the other hand, goes for $199.00 (just the gun) to $300 (with a leather holster). (I'd prefer a Remington TAC-14 push-style safety on the Rough Rider frame rather than the plastic flip on the cylinder back.)
Wow great review! I had the original Ruger Wrangler and loved it. The only pitfall the wragler had was in a indoor range with the lighting it was very difficult to get a true sight picture and see the target down range. Shooting the wrangler outdoors was way better for me. I did change out the grips on the wrangler with rose wood grips and the wider grips improved accuracy of the revolver. I did sell the wrangler and bought a Diamondback Sidekick 22LR/22WMR. Love this gun but the same issue shooting it in a indoor range. I just picked up my new Super Wrangler and added new rose wood grips. What a difference in the sights. I do need to take the super wrangler out to the range soon. Compaired to the Diamondback the adjustable sights on the super wrangler wins over the rear notch sights on the diamondback. Great review and really love your channel. Blessings to Y'All !!!
I also bought and installed the rosewood grips because I thought they looked more appealing on the silver Super Wrangler I bought a few months ago. It definitely improved appearance IMO, but it also was a very big improvement on grip in my hands shooting it. Only slightly wider, but massively more comfortable and controllable aim at least for me.
@@J1mInOH That's awesome. The rosewood grips do make a difference on looks. I do think the new grips will improve your accuracy due to a better purchase on the revolver. Thanks for your reply.
I have a rough rider. And I really enjoy it. I have another 22 single action.. But it was made in germany back into early sixties. About a four and a half inch barrel but it still shoots really well.
I absolutely hate the useless safety on the Rough Rider. I own one and have been very pleased with it with that one exception. I am very much considering getting a Wrangler.
TBH, I don't even notice it when I'm shooting. It is a nice feature when carrying. 🙂
@@cleekmaker00 To each their own I suppose. I find it ugly and pointless.
Thanks to your review of a couple of months ago, I got the Heritage Rough Rider. It's great fun as a plinking piece, but with the .22 Magnum cylinder and given how easy it was for me to get rounds on target, I see it as a handy backup gun.
I leave the safety turned off and just have an empty chamber under the hammer.
That's how the cowboys used to do it. 6 cylinders, 5 loaded, hammer on empty chamber.
I literally bought a Roughrider based on the grip alone. I fell in love with it when I saw it at the shop. Wood grip with burnt in stars and stripes. So sweet. Of course, the safety is stupid, but like he said... It was 100 bucks, hahahaha. Thanks for your info and input my friend!
If I didn't already have a Single Six for years, I might be interested in a Rough Rider. May get one anyway! Lol
Got the single six ruger great gun!!!I have a heritage alsolike them both but for a truck gun heritage is king just because of price.
Great review of two fun revolvers. Glad we have something like the traditional single-action that is affordable!
Kudos to the shooter who held the revolvers w/two hands and cocked the hammer with the Left thumb! This allows for better accuracy since the "firing " hand stays put when trigger is pulled.
Keep these good reviews coming, this is what informal "plinking" is all about. Safe, fun relaxation! Blsgs on you and yours, gg
Excellent comparisons. Cant go wrong with either. The ruger looks nicer with the cerakote but I love my Heritage and got multiple cylinder. So fun and nostalgic.
Pot metal frame. steel cylinder.
The Heritage Rough Rider is an exceptional value. You can buy them as a combo gun or purchase a .22 magnum cylinder separately. You can also buy a birdhead grip and swap out grip frames easily. Heritage has a large inventory of accessories available online. The actions a slick, the guns are very accurate and reliable. Ruger makes fine firearms, but I prefer the Rough Riders. They are great little guns!
Worked in a firearms shop for a couple years, these new Heritage revolvers...the only good thing I can say about them is Heritage was more than happy to repair them when there were issues. They may have been made well at some point in the past I'm sure. Never had a problem with the Wranglers that I can remember, and Ruger's customer service was johnny on the spot for other items if there were issues.
Heritage in my opinion is the better gun much nicer and close to tradition
It has a safety FFS.
So, I owned a Heritage Rough Rider in .22 Mag and .22 LR. Was a 3.5 inch birdshead model. Wasn't the biggest fan. It had the tendency to overshoot the half cock for loading so you would have to cock the revolver, lower it, and try to get it back to half cock. The loading gate felt loose and like it would just fly off. The fit and finish was meh but the biggest offender was the fact that a couple screws backed out. I tried tightening it down and the threads were stripped out of the Zemack frame. The Wrangler was built stout but I didn't like the grip since I found my thumb constantly slipping off the hammer mid-cocking action. Found that wasn't an issue with the bidshead and wrote Ruger for a year telling them they needed to make a bidshead grip. The only other issue I had with the Ruger was the loading gate. I almost tore my thumbnail off when trying to load when my thumb slipped and caught the underside of my nail on the gates edge. That gate almost needed a flathead screwdriver to open. Even so, I would rather shoot that Ruger any day of the week over a Heritage. I just have so much more confidence in the Ruger Build and Quality Control Standards
I got a Heritage after watching several comparison video's like this. I got the Heritage largely based on it fitting my funds available at the time. One point made in many video's is the two screws on the back strap need to be be blue lock tight down because they will walk out. I also have a EIG Model E15 made in Germany I have no idea how long ago I inherited from my dad. The frame is marked 22LR. The cylinder is marked 22 Magn Germany. The grips have a buffalo on each side on them. It only has three clicks.
I chose the Heritage over the Wrangler , the main reason was the Ruger doesn't index when you rotate the cylinder to load/unload
The basic battle between cost, finish and "authenticity". One or two will have to be sacrificed or at least given lessor priority.
The Heritage uses a simpler and cheaper to make hammer block safety, the Wrangler a more expensive. transfer bar system. The Heritage requires the shooter to use it or to keep an empty chamber under the hammer; so it's always the shooters responsibility. The more expensive transfer bar on the Ruger is always there working, so the level of safety is higher and not dependent on the shooter.
The finish plays an important part in cost. Both the Heritage and Wrangler use non-authentic blued steel for the frame to keep the cost affordable. Cast zinc is easier than cast aluminum and holds up well. But the zinc frame looks rounded on the Heritage, giving it a rather less polished fit. Since it's not blued, but coated, it looks, well, cheap. The aluminum on the Wrangler has a wonderful crisp fit and surface to it. This is thanks to Ruger's other business, as a precision metal casting supplier for other companies (Pine Tree Castings), including those not in the firearms business. But aluminum by itself looks totally unauthentic and doesn't blue well, hence the Cerakote. It's a really tough surface, far more durable than many other finishes, but it will never be glossy like blued steel. The grip frame is zinc, also Cerakoted. Ruger decided to go with Cerakote for the barrel, too, instead of blued. From a design point of view, this was a good idea, as it keeps the look of the gun consistent from grip to muzzle. Why then not Cerakote the trigger, hammer and cylinder? Besides the wear factor, especially on the cylinder, it was also looks: they are visual accents according to purpose. Trigger and hammer fire the rounds (one color), cylinder holds the rounds (another color) and grip/frame/barrel complete the system (the final color). The Heritage looks a little disjointed style wise when compared to the Wrangler.
Authenticity or it's lack of it, is a dilemma that can't be resolved (or for some, forgiven) when price has to come into play. It costs more for authenticity, which may keep it out of the purchaser it was intended for, thus negating the whole reason for the gun. Heritage took the more authentic route, to some with mixed results. Ruger uses the "inspired by" mindset and went non authentic with the Cerakote, but some have called it heresy. In both the Heritage and Wrangler, it's the "feel" that's the thing and both do a good, very good job of it. Funny how there wasn't any huge uproar way back, when Ruger put adjustable sights on a Colt SAA patterned revolver way back when...
Very excellent comments.Enjoyed your information on the Heritage Rough Rider and the Ruger Wrangler.
I have shot both and own 2 Heritage rough riders which both had to be sent back because they would only fire half the time. Buy the Ruger, you get what you pay for
Nice review..I have the heritage rough rider.22 it's nice works well..I didn't know Taurus owned..
i mistakenly shot half a box of 22lr in my ruger single six’s 22wmr cylinder. nothing bad happened at all, except my embarrassment.
I don’t like all the safety warnings stamped all over the Heritage.
Nice video. Good unbiased information about 2 similar firearms. Thank you.
Your the man Sootch! Thanks for the comparison!
Thanks for stopping by Smitty!
I wish Ruger limited the Cerakoting to the frame but nitrided the barrel and ejector housing to match the cylinder. Right now I'm only considering adding the black Super Wrangler to my collection, however I'm prioritizing finding a used slightly finish worn Single Six first.
The Heritage just looks like a cap gun. I bought a Wrangler. However…..the pistol keyholed rounds and was returned to Ruger. They promptly replaced it with a different revolver and that one shoots great!
"The Heritage looks like a cap gun" but nothing on the market today reminds me more of my Mattel Fanner 50 of my youth than the Ruger Wrangler does. Cerakote on a single action isn't an attractive look to me.
And my Heritage didn't need to get replaced due to keyholing. It shot 6 rounds into 1.25" clusters at 25 yards from a machine rest when new and 8,500 rounds and two years later, it still does.
Been seriously looking at the Super Wrangler since it came out. The Rough Riders are fun guns, but I don't like the idiot switch on the back. The first gun I bought was a Ruger Blackhawk, and I kinda want the matching .22.
My mom bought a little heritage four and three quarter inch barrel revolver back around 1991. She passed away in 2010 but that little revolver is still going strong. They don't have the same quality as a Colt or a Ruger. The materials are a little cheaper. The workmanship is not the same as Ruger or Colt but they are sturdy little guns. I know that Colt wasn't on this comparison but they are my favorite firearm company. I've just always liked colts. The single action army is the best revolver of all time.
one screw that always comes loose is the one holding the unloading lever chassis to the barrel. loctite that one.
I have 2 rough riders and word to the wise after you buy one get some loctite thread locker for the screws. They walk loose especially the one on the ejector. But all in all great little pistol for the price.
Bought a Wrangler and it shot 3 of 6 rounds very well. The other 3 went wide and made enlongated , not round, holes. Nice Ruger CS lady knew exactly what I was talking about and said send it to them. Got message that they would replace the revolver or send it back with an advisory that it was unsafe to shoot (!??!) Of course I opted for the replacement. The new one came and basically shot the same way - keyholing plus had to beat on the unloading rod to get some of the casings out. Traded the 2nd Ruger for some ammo at a pawn shop and bought a Rough Rider for $109. It shots fine after I put dayglow paint on the front sight (old eyes). This is just my most recent negative experience with Ruger. Getting tired of being their QC department.
I will go with the Ruger, also it looks like the front screw on the bottom of the trigger guard is missing on the Heritage. Good comparison on both the revolvers.
Got the burnt bronze one. I call her, "Steampunk Sally". Lol
I take my heritage when I go fishing here in Florida. Load it with the magnum shot shells just in case I run into a venomous snake and can’t get away from it.
love my Rough Rider its broken a few time tigger spring but easy to fix and you can get all kinds of hammers and triggers for them. we have tested 22lr in the 22 Magnum and it will fire but your speed is cut in half be cus the case is fire forming to the 22 Magnum size i think its like .16 biger
I checked out the Wrangler. I prefer mey Heritages. Although I have seen a downgrade in quality since Taurus bought out Heritage.
Number 1 turnoff for the Ruger? Open the loading gate and the cylinder spins. Personally I don't care for that from a more primitive gun.
But then again I also muzzle load hunt with a Thompson Center .50 Hawken in Caprock and hate in lines.
We have both the Ruger and the Heritage. The Heritage we’ve had for over 25 years. The Heritage looks way better than the Ruger. That cheesy ceramic finish and the plastic grips don’t look good. Our screws have never backed out.
I have 3 heritage and 2 wrangler all are great gun's thanks for the great videos
I have a heritage with adjustable fiber optic sights and the 22 magnum cylinder as well. Super fun guns and the 22 magnum is a pretty impressive round.
I would spring for the Super Wrangler over the Heritage Rough Rider.
That is understandable...when we bought our Heritage years ago the Wrangler didn't offer the magnum cylinder, and it took Ruger years to figure out why the Heritage stayed ahead in sales...
Does the .22 magnum Cylinder from the super wrangler fit in the reguler Wrangler?
One benefit of the safety on the Rough Rider is the pistol can be dry fired without out damage when the safety is engaged.
I've heard of people breaking that plastic safety after dry firing a lot.
Wrangler is dry fire safe as well. Forget exactly what it is but I believe it’s recessed chambers for the ruger. Not 100% sure tho. I just know it is dry fire safe as well
I’ve got a Heritage 6”. Bought the magnum cylinder for it to, great gun.
Not even a competition, Wrangler wins hands down. I have owned and fired both. The Ruger is safer. The Ruger is more accurate. The Ruger has tighter tolerances. The Ruger has a more durable finish. They are only close in trigger pull.
Heritage all day.
The Ruger also comes in short barrel with a birds head grip. Which are really cool.
I happen to have both guns. They're both great
Can the .22mag cylinder from the super Wrangler fit in the regular Wrangler ?
My dad dropped and broke the heritage he got me for Christmas a few years ago. Was sad but it was a pretty good gun the little bit I got to shoot it before it broke. Might fix it one day if I can do it cheap
My dad has had a Ruger Super Blackhawk in 44 Magnum for decades, awsome gun to shoot. I've always had faith in that revolver, and with shotshells, its saved my hide from danger noodles a couple of times. Now Im an owner of a Silver Super Wrangler, snd couldnt be happier, its dead nuts accurate.
The issue with Ruger is sometimes you just want a cowboy/western period looking gun. Their answer has been to give us the wrangler in non-period colours and in the case of other Ruger "six shooter" pistols- pistols that give fudderalore guns a run for their money. Sometimes I just want a pistol that makes me feel like Billy the Kid not one that makes me feel like a 60's boomer who is vicarilously also a space cowboy.
You can still get the Ruger Single Six but you won't be paying the Wrangler price. I'd prefer the Ruger Single Ten in stainless if I was going that route.
I really like this style of safety on rimfire guns because they let you dry fire the gun without messing up the firing pin or chamber mouth. Walter P22 is an excellent training pistol for this reason, you can put the safety on and dry fire to your heart's content.
I've got rough rider.
The fit and finish is a show of low grade cheap manufacturing techniques. It will scratch, the black isn't even,
That 9 shot rough rider with the adjustable fiberoptic sights is a bit more expensive, but will hit a golf ball reliably at 15 yards.
The engineering is a show of how to use those cheap manufacturing techniques to produce reasonable reliability and precision in a firearm.
Yah, clean those thread and apply some locktite.
I've got some firearms that my heir's would love to own. The rough rider is not one of them.
I have many options in the safe to take to the range. I use several to practice for currency with my concealed carry or home defense, but I just picked up my Super Wrangler just before Christmas ‘23 and it has to be the most fun of all of them to take to the range. Something oddly satisfying in loading, shooting and unloading these. Cheap to shoot and utterly fun! Wish I’d bought it sooner!
9:25 - The third click on a SA revolver is functional; it's when the cylinder lock bolt is released so it can lock the cylinder. Something to note, on my Rough Riders (and this one in the video), the third click is actually the full cock position (it's not supposed to be). In this third click position, you can fire the gun, but the cylinder is not locked in position. Watch the video carefully, and after that third click, the hammer stays back (full cock), but pulling it back further, you see the cylinder turn and lock into position. This is a fault in the gun's design; firing the gun with the cylinder not locked means the bullet is not lined up with the barrel, and will likely shave some lead off when fired.
I've seen this on every Rough Rider (and my Barkeep) I've handled, even in a store's inventory.
I just got a steel frame Heritage RR sight are spot no for the money and how nice it works.Makes me want a second one also dealing with Ruger have not up to standard. I see Ruger as a name only at this point don't think I will be getting any more.
crazy how much prices have gone up since this video.
My Rough Rider's front sight is off alignment, but still shots great you just have to give it a little Kentucky windage. When I held the Wrangler it felt plastic, I thought the barrel was polymer with a liner at first. Just didn't like the feel. The super six I have shot was butter smooth and deadly accurate.
I like how cheap the parts are HRR. Great for recreating famous 6 shooters.
I have the Rough Rider. It's a lot of fun.
Just got a Mark V, now I need the Ruger.
Would rather have an aluminum frame over a Zamak one, but the Heritage is always less expensive than the Wrangler. Luckily I can handle the slight co$t difference to get the one that will retain its value down the road. But if I were truly broke, I'd be cruising pawn shops looking for a Heritage...
I have the Heritage and it’s a fun gun to shoot and have had zero problems. I really dislike the safety, though…looks stupid. On the other hand, I really dislike the looks of the Ruger. the two-toned finish looks stupid on what should be a traditional single color…preferably blued, but at least all black.
I own a herritage, with 6.5-inch barrel and .22 WMR 9-round cylinder. Its very accurate. A real pleasure to shoot.
Nice 22 hand guns thanks for sharing sootch00
My Heritage sucks. At 7yds 75% of the rounds are keyholing. I’ve shot LR and Magnums with the same results. Even tried subsonics. Crown of the barrel is horrendous. Contacted Heritage and they want $100 to fix their poor QC. I’ve come to expect this from the Taurus umbrella 🤷🏻♂️.
The comment about the 22 mag being a better self defense option over the 22LR is probably not true unless you go with the 7.5” barrel numerous gel and chrono tests on You Tube prove this there is very little benefit in short barreled handguns with the 22WMR as most of the powder burn occurs outside of handgun length barrels but definitely is true in a rifle but that 7.5” or longer barrel might capitalize somewhat on the extra powder but the Federal Punch ammo in handguns does give you as good of velocities and penetration on the 22 LR cartridge in comparison to a test against 22WMR search the internet for chrono tests and ballistic gel test, as an example Tools & Targets videos has numerous test with both chrono and gel tests
There are some videos out here that show the longer barrels in revolvers actually get diminishing returns, the thinking the cylinder gap can't be overcome sufficiently...
I bought a Heritage with the bird's head grip, both cylinders in nickel finish. Though the safety is a bit odd, I love this little revolver. It was good to learn Taurus owns Heritage.
Cool. I ordered the Talo version on base last week fir$272…but ended up canceling it for a Mark IV target.
Here’s yer’ upthumb.