ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

Quantum Particles with Dr. Jason Lisle

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2022
  • Dr Jason Lisle, Astrophysicist discusses the nature of Quantum Particles and how they exist and that it could not be a product of random chance.
    hosted by Creationfellowshipsantee@gmail.com
    Email us to get on our mailing list to see more great content Please like this video and subscribe to our channel.

ความคิดเห็น • 171

  • @davidfaumuina9866
    @davidfaumuina9866 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you Christian Fellowship for bringing this to my attention I thoroughly enjoyed this educational video

  • @MrCharlieTech5
    @MrCharlieTech5 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thank you! I’m a nerdy believer who only learned about quantum physics from a secular point of view. When I discovered sites like Answers in Genesis, Biblical Science Institute, I’ve been like 😮
    Now that there’s a quantum physics video (Thanks again, BTW) I’m like 🤯🤯.

  • @marcouch333
    @marcouch333 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    this man, dr.Jason lisle.. tremendously helped t instill the lord jesus christ in my heart.. as a science lover i was torn. because i wanted to know god,just all the secular contradictions...so THANK YOU mr. lisle , for doing gods good ole'dirty work. and helping us to find our TRUTH IN THE CHRISTAIN FAITH(:

  • @WhereTwoWaysMet
    @WhereTwoWaysMet ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Dr. Lisle!!!! 👍🏻❤️🙏🏻

  • @paulmerritt2484
    @paulmerritt2484 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The sun earth moon ratio can tell us some secrets of the larger universe we can not observe. It takes faith to even go there. I feel know things I feel I should not know but also they seem so obvious now. Thank you Dr lisle for helping me literally believe and understand the Bible.

  • @vikingskuld
    @vikingskuld ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey i just wanted to say thanks for this video. It was pretty well done. So i just wanted to say thank you

  • @horationelson57
    @horationelson57 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A lovely twist. Quantum Physics explained through the lens of Theism. As Oliver Twist implores, ''Please, Sir, I want some more.'' Regards from Australia

  • @kongchan437
    @kongchan437 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dr Lisle. Thanks for taking the stance of taking Bible's account of Creation as is. No more. No less. I dont understand how, but God created this universe in 6 literal days as recorded in the Bible. Creation is a miracle only God can do.

  • @davidfaumuina9866
    @davidfaumuina9866 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The Higgs boson particle also known as the God particle or Cosmic clue is held together by Jesus Christ himself the children song had it right a long time ago, "He holds the whole world in his hands". And it's spin is effected by all other elementary elements, IMO. God bless.

    • @kongchan437
      @kongchan437 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes indeed. His name is wonderful.

  • @shawncalderon4950
    @shawncalderon4950 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great presentation!

  • @des711
    @des711 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you both for this video!

  • @stephenfennell
    @stephenfennell ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is a great talk, Dr Lisle! I'm at the 34 minute mark and have to go now, but to my disbelief (especially with your rapid delivery) I managed to keep up with most of what u said. I'm sure I'll forget it very quickly, so I'll have to listen again, but this is actually the first time I've managed to get my head around these families of elementary particles. I've tried to understand them many times in the past but could never take it in at all. Thank you!

  • @flyfishing739
    @flyfishing739 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would it be possible to assume that decayed particles creating electrons would explain the expansion of the universe?

  • @paulmerritt2484
    @paulmerritt2484 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This may sound crazy but I feel I need to speak to this man.

  • @dennishagans6339
    @dennishagans6339 ปีที่แล้ว

    question, I saw a figure that there are 10 to the 80 power atoms in the universe, ok the James Webb telescope was trained on certain area and found more galaxies, so if they are finding more stuff then how do they know how many atoms there are if they have not seen it all, also there is talk of galaxies that are so far away now, we will never be able to see them, how do we know how their atoms add up?

  • @YECBIB
    @YECBIB ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I have an Autographed book from Dr. Jason Lisle. 👍✝️

    • @robertramsey653
      @robertramsey653 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm not one to be envious, but I'm feeling a little green here lol.

    • @paulmerritt2484
      @paulmerritt2484 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robertramsey653 Please be sure to listen to him but do not worship him. He would say the same and I love this man too. This is for his love for Jesus who also said do not call me great as I have my commandments.

    • @robertramsey653
      @robertramsey653 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@paulmerritt2484 I surely hope I dont worship any man. Besides JESUS, who is GOD and man. I follow apologetics pretty closely, and Dr. Lisle happens to be one of my favorite apologists.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You wasted your money.

    • @YECBIB
      @YECBIB 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidgardner863 not at all, whackadoodle

  • @ckimsey77
    @ckimsey77 ปีที่แล้ว

    About 53:00...mentioning strong force being confined within the 3 quark pair but not outside it; what holds the nuclei together??? Is this a different "flavor" of the strong force binding positive protons together vs the quark trio?

    • @lluvik2450
      @lluvik2450 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The strong force has a large enough range that the particles consisting of quarks are also held together by the strong force

  • @edmartinez4932
    @edmartinez4932 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Romans 1-19,20. I think these verses speak of scientists in general. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
    He's an awesome God

    • @kongchan437
      @kongchan437 ปีที่แล้ว

      All powerful. All holy. All loving God.

  • @ZoeZoeZoe16
    @ZoeZoeZoe16 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for having Dr Lisle on. I love listening to him. He is so intelligent in so many areas. Especially in the word of God!

  • @gammafighter
    @gammafighter 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is exactly what I sound like when I'm explaining the magic system that I'm going to put in the fantasy novel I'm going to write one day.

  • @junacebedo888
    @junacebedo888 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I suggest the title of this video is 'Quantum Particles proves Intelligent Design.'

    • @RedefineLiving
      @RedefineLiving ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Biblical design*

    • @adamredwine774
      @adamredwine774 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But... it doesn't... so there's that.

    • @chrisneeds6125
      @chrisneeds6125 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Adam Redwine
      For you atheist it *never* will, unless you decay, by dropping the a and thereby become theist ♡♡♡

    • @adamredwine774
      @adamredwine774 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@chrisneeds6125 >For you atheist it never will... The nice thing about science is that it doesn't give a damn what your beliefs are.

    • @chrisneeds6125
      @chrisneeds6125 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Adam Redwine
      Correct. But unlike particles, we humans can make choices and decide what we believe...

  • @briancisco1176
    @briancisco1176 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wonderful! Thanks for sharing this.

  • @stuartofblyth
    @stuartofblyth ปีที่แล้ว

    "Lepton" (or at least its plural, "lepta") is found in Scripture: "Then one poor widow came and put in two lepta, which equals a quadrans".
    It's a pity that "top" and "bottom" were adopted rather than the original "truth" and "beauty". After all, we already had up and down, so why top and bottom?

  • @bushelfoot
    @bushelfoot 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If light is slowing down then it is loosing energy,.

  • @WhereTwoWaysMet
    @WhereTwoWaysMet ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My 🧠 is spinning! ⚛️

  • @dadsonworldwide3238
    @dadsonworldwide3238 ปีที่แล้ว

    With time appearing to be in our heads it really puts Stephen myer in trouble with fine tuning arguments that corners them in deep time evolutionary beliefs.
    James Webb observations really are shaking this up .
    But the galaxy morphology creates an idea of fireworks as opposed to raisen bread in secular model thinking.
    Young earth creation is really in the best position than I've seen in my 50 years over what is happening in all fields of study.

  • @vladvalentinov
    @vladvalentinov ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it's misleading to call elemental particles "particles". They aren't solid, they don't actually spin, they don't actually have colors. The jargon confuses everybody. Physicists should take it to another level of definition.

  • @ckimsey77
    @ckimsey77 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nm you answer it later lol...I get too impatient w questions

  • @des711
    @des711 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍👍👍👍👍

  • @paulhaynes3688
    @paulhaynes3688 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does this man ever put himself up for a open debate please let me know

    • @hudjahulos
      @hudjahulos ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He debated another astrophysicist, Hugh Ross

    • @paulhaynes3688
      @paulhaynes3688 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hudjahulos will try and see this

    • @paulhaynes3688
      @paulhaynes3688 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hudjahulos Ah I see it chaired by no less than than the convicted fraudster and wife abuser your one and only con man Mr Kent Hovind no bias going on in that debate. When l say debate l mean neutral ground neutral chair. Not the creationists fan club . Come on get real. Let’s see him in the great university’s.

    • @paulhaynes3688
      @paulhaynes3688 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@hudjahulos It’s the Kent Hovind and Mr Jason Lisle comedy show.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A real astrophysicist would tear him apart.

  • @paulablevins9886
    @paulablevins9886 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was wondering is quantum physics possibly the explanation of how Jesus got into the building with all the doors being shut?

    • @zimbabwe_twinnedwithanfield
      @zimbabwe_twinnedwithanfield ปีที่แล้ว

      lol

    • @azophi
      @azophi ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That or just … magic
      Or it just didn’t happen

    • @zimbabwe_twinnedwithanfield
      @zimbabwe_twinnedwithanfield ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@azophi what God opens no man can shut and what he shuts no man can open.

    • @lluvik2450
      @lluvik2450 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably not

    • @222ableVelo
      @222ableVelo ปีที่แล้ว

      I've wondered that too actually. We don't know probably even 1% of everything there is to know about physics. But Jesus could have used the quantum tunneling effect or something else as well.

  • @paulmerritt2484
    @paulmerritt2484 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had to change something in my last post as God drew me back with a new understanding. This is what I ended up putting instead. "The Word Love scares people so much because they face their own shame. Many pastors fear this Love revolution some call it as they tell Satan's lie to fear this Love they fear we worship a feeling and not the Lord. They fail to see that worshiping Love with Love is Worshipping the Lord with the very Love he loves us with to life. A person in love with the Lord who sings to the Lord does not care how they appear to others when they are Loving him and it is good. This is when we can God singing over us when we sing. When we truly speak in tongues it is because we have no human words that are sufficient to express our love for the Lord. "

  • @paulmerritt2484
    @paulmerritt2484 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is the extremes of the fractals he loves. I find this fascinating. If anyone is onto something I believe it is this man because he loves Jesus. We an not understand how God is making the universe expand. I heard Doctor Lisle suggest the speed of light may just be infinity. I see something in the fractals from atom to galaxies. We all see this much but what is too big we can not observe so God gave us fractals to see it. When we are in aa plane we are in a vacuum tube and do not know we travel almost 400 miles and hour. Everything seems to orbit a heavier thing with more gravity. Its math also. What if the observable universe is orbiting something. Centrifugal force causing the expansion? think of this. We can travel around the earth in seconds if we use a space elevator. We rise above the earth and it turns below us faster than we could ever have gone. If we add the speed that the universe travels can we add this to the one way speed of light to find out the speed of light is infinity as the fractals are infinitive? I think Dr Lisle can prove the speed of light is infinity. This would change everything. He is looking for it I just know.

    • @kongchan437
      @kongchan437 ปีที่แล้ว

      I suspect the speed of thought is faster than the speed of light ?

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You haven’t a clue of what you’re talking about, do you?

  • @RedefineLiving
    @RedefineLiving ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Deep!

  • @pavld335
    @pavld335 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do you think it is possible, that god doesn't know there's another god above him? How could we determine if that were not true?

    • @azophi
      @azophi ปีที่แล้ว

      I suppose such a god would be functionally nonexistent then to (our) god

    • @rovidius2006
      @rovidius2006 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't go too far that model can be found in everyone of us.

    • @azophi
      @azophi ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rovidius2006 lol yeah I mean same with God I figure that would just be some sort of deistic god yeah

    • @chrisneeds6125
      @chrisneeds6125 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Correct!!! God doesn't know there's another god above Him.

    • @obiecanobie919
      @obiecanobie919 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alien life may exist in large numbers, we are one little colony after all .The reason we don’t know is because is because we’ve have never seen it ., we can only see parts of the existing realm and that can be a small fraction of it .If one exists so do others !

  • @TWJfdsa
    @TWJfdsa ปีที่แล้ว

    No evidence for gravitons

  • @chrisneeds6125
    @chrisneeds6125 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much to Dr. Lisle for his simple explanation of a complicated subject.
    If gravity is like light in that it consists of a particle, the gravitron, why can't physicists make a double slit experiment by firing gravitons up against earth's gravity to find out how it works?

    • @stephenfennell
      @stephenfennell ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No one else has replied to this, so I will hazard my untrained and uneducated thoughts here: I think the effects of gravity pass almost completely unaffected through almost everything. (E.g. I think the gravitational pull of the sun on the moon is not diminished when the earth comes between them.) In that case it would not be possible to make a double slit to feed the gravitons through, because there is no material you can use that would block gravitons here and and allow others through there.

    • @chrisneeds6125
      @chrisneeds6125 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stephenfennell
      Thank you Stephen. What you're saying is that the gravitron behaves like a neutrino in that it can pass harmlessly through anything?

    • @stephenfennell
      @stephenfennell ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chrisneeds6125 Hi again, I'm out if my depth here! I sort of think gravitons have not been discovered yet. People surmise they could exist; it would be really nice to find a particle that caused gravity because, well, how on earth does gravity happen at a distance if there is no matter being exchanged by the two objects in question? How would the two objects "know" they were each there and respond by tugging on each other? But having those questions in one's mind doesn't prove gravitons must therefore exist.
      I'm talking like Aristotle: I have no practical knowledge of the matter at all, I'm sorry to say :(

    • @chrisneeds6125
      @chrisneeds6125 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Stephen Fennell
      On the other hand, why would a body with a gravitational pull care that another body was being affected by it?
      My personal hunch, very non-scientific, is that the gravitron is wishful thinking. For me, the situation helps to remind us of the Creator's power, making a force so strong yet no-one can find out how it works-very humbling 😁😃😂😊😀😄😅😇

  • @SciD1
    @SciD1 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Quantum mechanics is nothing more than a probabilistic mathematical framework based on the misunderstanding and the misinterpretation of the nature of light, and the double-slit experiment. Maybe that's why it is "probabilistic"... The math may be useful for replicating technology and chemical reactions, but it has no bearing on reality itself, because the theory is founded on the fallacy of quantum state superposition.

  • @azophi
    @azophi ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I disagree with Dr Lisle (not a Christian at all actually), but I respect him for going through his degree and doing well on it.
    More so than like Ken ham etc I think Jason Lisle is cool and he has my respect

    • @truthisbeautiful7492
      @truthisbeautiful7492 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Keep studying! Watch his other presentations too. Read the New Testament too.

    • @rovidius2006
      @rovidius2006 ปีที่แล้ว

      You would not think of it unless mind wasn't up to the task ,most life forms don't have it this way ,it must be that the thought of eternity was planned and planted there before our conception ,we can only use it or loose it as time is of the essence .., most life forms do their job instinctually why would we humans differ ,consciousness is intriguing best minds .

    • @azophi
      @azophi ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rovidius2006 well we don’t exactly know how consciousness works, but the general theory is that it’s an emergent property of the brain
      But yeah there’s a lot of neuroscience to be done I guess

    • @rovidius2006
      @rovidius2006 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@azophi Most everyone agrees with that ,the real question is how do you get to that in a environment that kills everything unless special care is afforded ,only on earth environment allows life to flourish .You are bound to a ship floating through universe in a precise pattern ,not knowing enough to change the course or understand its meaning .

    • @azophi
      @azophi ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rovidius2006 actually there are an estimated 300 million habitable planets in the Milky Way alone
      And besides our earth really isn’t that great for life I mean do you know how bad some places on earth are 😂
      But I mean…yeah. Obviously life has existed in a place where it is possible for life to exist. The real miracle would be if God made life on a planet where life was naturally impossible

  • @donnylastella9441
    @donnylastella9441 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting but frankly I get lost except for the fact that God's mind is so incredibly complex I can't help but say thank you for all you are Lord all praise and Glory belong to you and you alone ‼️🔥🔥🔥💪🏼🙏🎁

  • @YECBIB
    @YECBIB ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I debunk any evolutionist in 5 min

    • @RedefineLiving
      @RedefineLiving ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😎

    • @adamredwine774
      @adamredwine774 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Your ignorance does not qualify as "debunking"

    • @YECBIB
      @YECBIB ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamredwine774 what are you, a dunce?

    • @adamredwine774
      @adamredwine774 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@YECBIB I am not, no. You, however, certainly seem to be.

    • @YECBIB
      @YECBIB ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamredwine774 Oh,so you're mostly a rude chump! Good one 👏

  • @YECBIB
    @YECBIB ปีที่แล้ว +1

    China is running AI like a Deadliest Warrior episode on the world 🌎. Look out,out there.

    • @chrisneeds6125
      @chrisneeds6125 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is God boss over China (over His creation)?

    • @YECBIB
      @YECBIB ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@chrisneeds6125 China needs to get with Christ ✝️

    • @chrisneeds6125
      @chrisneeds6125 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Raw Biblical Creationism Data
      There are many Chinese believers, as i'm sure you know.
      But Scripture only talks about "and all Israel shall be saved." Check PSALM 2 for an accurate picture of the nations today, the rulers have taken counsel together against God and His people. They have cast away God’s values and commands.

  • @paulhaynes3688
    @paulhaynes3688 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mr Lisle deluded

  • @hank_says_things
    @hank_says_things ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Paging Professor Dave.
    This is laughable.

    • @lluvik2450
      @lluvik2450 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its really not

    • @marciamcgrail5889
      @marciamcgrail5889 ปีที่แล้ว

      instead of throwing fallacious elephants around, do you have any specific evidence for your immaturity?

    • @eswn1816
      @eswn1816 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ha!
      Professor Dave is "laughable" (clueless!)
      Check out Tour's latest set of debunking videos. Not only is Dave inaccurate, but it seems as though he's not very scientifically ethical either.

    • @69eddieD
      @69eddieD ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@eswn1816 You reference Tour and then complain about scientific ethics? How ironic.

    • @eswn1816
      @eswn1816 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@69eddieD
      Tour's scientific ethics are impeccable.
      Share an unethical quote, please...