วีดีโอ

You needed to spend more time with your year figure. You show 30 billion in your formula but you list 180 billion. Watch what you're doing to get your math right. 180B/20/300=30M. 30B/20/300=5M. Again, you should have explained the years needed much better. You're leaving me confused with your years needed explanation.

I wonder if the Bible would have sold nearly as well as it has over the centuries if the things mentioned on this video had been included in its pages. The Bible, in its present form, is the most important, fascinating, interesting, precious, and life changing book that's ever been published. If it's not, God is too good to hide a better book from humanity. It's as if God kept just enough in the canon to keep us guessing and still get the blessing, while the trustworthy, non scriptural, supplemental material is like icing on the cake of divine revelation.

Lol, nope. “So, the bottom line is there is no crisis in terms of the standard model of cosmology,” Finkelstein said. “Any time you have a theory that has stood the test of time for so long, you have to have overwhelming evidence to really throw it out. And that’s simply not the case.” science.nasa.gov/missions/webb/webb-finds-early-galaxies-werent-too-big-for-their-britches-after-all/

Love you so much, Dr. Lisle! You have helped me and so many others understand God and his amazing creation. Thank you so much for being such a wonderful disciple of Jesus Christ !Someday soon, would you please give a lecture on the Trinity?

Great information with confirmation ❤

24:56 Why the thumb? It aims for thumbs?

Problem I have with any more incursions of angels with women is why they did not take over the entire population once again like they did in the days of Noah? They should have completely infiltrated the entire human race again by the time of Abraham.

Really great job and great video. And only 518 views in 3 months. Sad. It's much worse than that though. "1 beneficial mutation every 300 generation" - "beneficial mutation" does not mean "new information". Science does not know even 1 (single) example of "new information". It is just not possible both from logical and mathematical point of view.

Sometimes I wonder how all the radiation we live in affects the particles we are made of.

PLEASE SEND THIS TO THE RIGHT MEDIA FOR OUR DEFENSE!!! They need to hear this!!! CBN,will broadcast it! Please please send this to them!!

I was a Christian for the first 45 years of my life and fell away. I wanted desperately to get back to God so I prayed and I read and studied the Bible and how it was written and wanted to believe so incredibly bad but I just can’t get past the facts that I’ve learned such as the fundamental stories are based on older ancient writings and it therefore cannot be solely “God’s Word”. There’s a much earlier creation account in the Enuma Elish, the flood story, there’s a much earlier version in the Epic of Gilgamesh. There are even other people who were said to have done the same things as Jesus, both doing miracles and dying and living again. I promise I’m not trying to be argumentative, I’m just simply trying to find someone who can help me comprehend how it’s possible to believe what seems so obviously just another take on the earlier myths. I am sincerely trying to reconcile this in my heart and mind.

Question: if light can travel at infinite speed what is the wavelength shift of that light. Light is a particle and light is a wave. How does redshift get affected by ASC?

Dear lord

The body of Christ needs this. Thankful the Lord raises up His servants to edify one another.

There’s a difference between exaggerating and outright lying. Darwinoatheists are outright lying.

Was no big bang

Support NASA - continues to provide data that supports biblical creation. Space Coast Creation Club.

Jason I think you are always going to run into the charge of _"special pleading"_ with your anisocincrety starlight - time solution and I think there is a better solution if we look at the way matter specifically the proton must have been created. This the basis of my idea.. *Biblical Creation - RETROSPECTIVE AGE MODEL:* The real problem for physics and cosmology is the origin of matter. Big bang requires all matter to be created in the first 380 million years in a diameter of about 84.6 million light years. To check the validity of Big Bang we need two slutions to Einstein's equation of relativity - Schwarzschild's and deSitter both in 1917 We first calculate the Schwarzschild's radius of the universe at which its total mass M would collapse into a black hole? Mass of universe = 1e80 protons = 1.67e53 Kg Escape velocity = v = √(2GM/r) therefore r = 2GM/v^2 Substitute M = 1.67e53 and v = 3e8 m/sec (speed of light) *Minimum dia of the universe to avoid collapse into a black hole is 52.5 billion light years!* Matter of the universe could not be created early in a big bang! Particle pair production at CERN also confirms antimatter exactly equals matter, (first law of thermodynamics) so there is no net residual of matter falsifying the assumed creation of matter by pure concentration of energy. Running the universe back in time is not the same for its energy and matter. A candle burning (like star we see today) ENERGY (photons) can go back to a point but the MATTER of the universe cannot. The candle gets BIGGER and must STOP at its maximum state of ORDER minimum entropy! Stars must by the second law do the same they cannot form by self gravity from a higher entropy state (Wallace 2009)! There had to be an expansion of space followed by the creation of wave energy with no mass except earth at centre to nearly the size we observe today. This is where the deSitter solution (1917) of Einstein's wave equation comes in and amazingly fits the Biblical account: Day 1: _"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth"_ Earth with space stretched out Day 1: God said _"let there be light"_ photon energy injected into expanding space equal to the total mass and energy of the universe Day 4: God said _"he made the stars also"_ after the expansion the mind of God collapses the wave energy into stars, planets, moons etc The delayed quantum eraser experiment shows a MIND collapses a wave to produce a particle with a history written retrospectively in time! The collapse is also instantaneous, has no antimatter problem, no gravity problem and solves the starlight time problem with no need for add hoc miracles! With earth existing before the stars it is unlikely all the wave energy would come from one point too close as it would destroy the earth plus distant quasars being so massive the wave energy would be too week by the time it got there and then there is the ordered placement of stars on swirling galaxies so I propose the following. Day 1 God creates time (beginning), space (Heavens) and matter (earth). God then stretches out the space from around earth many times faster than light. On a sphere six light days from earth he injects light into the expanding space at the centre of where every star will end up in their highly ordered galaxies. The light corresponds to every _"particle"_ wave that will make up the entire mass of the universe. After 3 days of expansion on day 4 His infinite mind collapses most of that energy to form every star, black hole, planet (beyond earth) and moon. Since the trace of light goes back to the six light day surface so does the observed history which after six days reaches earth. It means the history of the stars we observe is real and does go back billions of years in OUR frame of reference calculated by the distance but in THEIR frame of reference that history was created instantaneously backwards from 6000 years ago and by day 4 that light reached earth so Adam created on day 6 could see stars billions of light years away. The massive intensity of light being created on the six light day sphere means a concentration which by the time the echo of it reaches earth it is observed as an ultra smooth low temperature radiation we know as the CMBR. This also explains why even moons are hot on the inside. If they formed by external accretion of matter over long periods of time then all the heat would be generated on the outside and immediately begin radiating back into outer space and the planet would have a cold centre. But if created by wave energy from the inside then there is a reason why excess of that energy could create the hot interior we discovered. Since _"God has made it plain"_ all our answers should be plain to both non-believers and believers regardless of the sophistication of the technology. The biblical account is the only account which correctly separates space and matter using both Schwarzschild's and deSitter solutions to Einstein's equation of relativity overcoming the antimatter and second law problems of the Big Bang. It is therefore no longer necessary for creationists to deny the obvious history of light from distant stars and look _"dumb"_ or require add-hock miracles or special pleading to solve what has been a major stumbling block for many who question the truth of the Bible based on the stars which should give glory to God to anyone who looks at them.

Fascinating! Thanks for sharing.

Мы научились далеко смотреть через Хаббл, Джеймс Уэбб, Спектр РГ и почему то все "деревья да дерево". Пора и на «лес» посмотреть - через «лазерную цифровую рулетку с опорным импульсом *+опорное расстояние* в 1000000 м». Опыт Майкельсона Морли (1887 г) популярен, а нам нужно его улучшить с помощью «лазерной рулетки *+опорное расстояние* в 1000000 м» что позволяет уйти от большого шума (мусора). так возможно и определим; скорость в самолете; 200, 300, 400, 500 м/с. Вопрос к Вам; что изменится в БОЛЬШОЙ НАУКЕ?

You need to add error bars to your graph, particularly the tired light model green line, those errors bars are quite large the further back you go.

WARNING, this is fundamentalism disguised as science!

LMAO!!! Maybe you should provide actual evidence that the bible is correct. Maybe demonstrate that god actually exists!!!

So, then, the Hubble Constant of 73.8 km/sec/Mpc, is replaced by the Lisle Constant of 0.0 km/sec/Mpc! You know you’ve arrived when you discover a New Constant!

The critics get quite offended when bb or evo are challenged. They instantly resort to ad hominem or accusation to make their case. They don’t accept the scientific method or the data. they only accept popular “scientific” opinion.

Really good stuff. Q for Lisle: can dark matter be normal matter that just isn’t seen?

Science does not know what: mass, energy, space, and time is. Science uses comparisons to manipulate these phenomena. For example, at one time a foot was the length of the king's foot. Ergo, a foot was two marks an a stick passed around the kingdom. And this "science" is used to prove god is?

This guy just demonstrated there is no big bang. Christians have for a long time said this proved god. Most of my life Christians claimed science was wrong about god. Now you preach science proves god. Science is observation, theorizing, predicting, testing. You can observe a watch. Can you observe god? You can theorize about the phenomena but it does not predict something that can be tested. Ergo, there is no god because nobody can demonstrate, predict, or test the theory. The only thing you have is faith and "what ifs." I await your response.

Mankind is suffering more cancers, allergies, defective organs, and premature deaths than ever before, do you know why? Because we are devolving not evolving. DNA thousands of years ago was perfect, totally pristine, since the fall of man its been going downhill since, not improving as the silly mutational corruption of information would have you believe. If we corrupted any information we have created, books, computer code, etc, it would not take long before the information was useless. DNA is orders of magnitude more complex than any information mankind has produced but the corruption is the same, it will eventually lead to the extinction of life. DNA is the most complex information ever discovered, it is the most compact storage system ever found, it utilises a 4D (time being the 4th dimension) folding mechanism that produces new information, it is in fact so sophisticated that it cannot be replicated using super computers. The fact people actually believe DNA created itself for no reason or purpose is more mindboggling than the incredible complexity of the DNA itself. Evolution is an example of a dogmatic worldview that ignores truth, wisdom, and common sense, in favour of never seen observations, information not requiring a mind, complexity not necessitating a designer, and inanimate matter moving toward life. The reason Origin of Life is kept separate from evolution is because it is impossible, only life can make life, it is stage one of evolution and evolution cannot happen without OoL. The evidence for evolution if it were true should be overwhelming but it is weak and pathetic, it is supported on wobbly foundations using presupposition, assumption, circular reasoning, worldview biased data interpretation, lies, fraudulent evidence, wilfully ignoring and dismissing any refuting evidence that disproves it.

There is no god. Science serves to observe the physical not the spiritual.

Thank you, Dr Lisle.. "a new Cosmology"..

Haldane died an Evolutionist! Obviously, his dilemma did NOT even change HIS mind about the truth of evolution. He just assumed future research would refute his dilemma, whiich is, in fact, TRUE.

Oh I have seen Lisle telling the same lies already. JWST does not support you long disproved religion. He was paid to get his PhD and he has been lying about science ever since he got it.

Has Dr. Lisle ever looked into the plasma-universe or electric-universe theories?

Why do I get science and reality denial like this in my inbox? Jason fake dr Lisle is a liar.

I really enjoy Dr. Jason Lisle. Thank you Dr. Lisle and thank you Creation Fellowship for having him on.

Excellent!!!

😀

I see I'm coming here rather late, but this may help anyone else doing so: There may be some later video presentations by Jason after this, in which he might incorporate some of the questions asked here. Jason does a great job explaining how the OT came to down to us and why we can rely upon basically the critical Hebrew and Greek Texts we have today, since God preserved the originals for us by being able to compare all the different manuscripts we have. But there were some things in the questions he couldn't be specific about, since his studies are mostly about science, not history or textual criticism (e.g., one of the things he couldn't recall on the spot is the CBGM - Coherence-Based Genealogical Method - which some very Biblical Christians are also participating in). So for further REFERENCE and help on those questions about the original Texts, the _Textus Receptus_ and how we got the Canon, etc., I'd also recommend: th-cam.com/video/uTeLO-61FAA/w-d-xo.html (2022 - G3 Conference - How We Got our Bible; qued to where the 'meaty' facts begin), th-cam.com/video/XmlHYeT8vyc/w-d-xo.html (2022 - G3 Conference - Making Sense of Manuscripts), th-cam.com/video/DTki0ESXIJk/w-d-xo.html (Michael Kruger - 2022 - How Did We Get Our Bible), th-cam.com/video/r1iiusiS6lg/w-d-xo.html (at a church, DEC 2022, The Reliability of Scripture), th-cam.com/video/l8EUtEt7RX8/w-d-xo.html (2022, How Can We Trust That the Bible We Have Today Is What God Originally Inspired?), th-cam.com/video/LVVRfu1eLSU/w-d-xo.html [James White interviewing Michael Kruger on the Biblical Canon; who decided the books of the Bible?] Searching for their names in YT might give you more recent videos. Jason was 'fuzzy' about the LSB (Legacy Standard Bible) which actually uses "Yahweh" as the name of God; definitely not "Jehovah". I personally prefer retaining LORD, since we cannot know 100% how it should be pronounced/written (and many pastors don't even pronounce the English the same as the assumed Hebrew in those cases). But it definitely makes a point that "day" is defined in Genesis 1:5 ("And God called the light day, and the darkness He called night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day.") as 1 normal day of daylight and night. You can read it for free from here: www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%201%3A5-7&version=LSB . (Overall, it's not much different than the NASB or ESV which for very deep Bible study; apart from using Hebrew and Greek as well, you can find most English Bible translations online in order to compare all of them together.) PS: My name is Daniel B. Sedory.

Quantum mechanics is nothing more than a probabilistic mathematical framework based on the misunderstanding and the misinterpretation of the nature of light, and the double-slit experiment. Maybe that's why it is "probabilistic"... The math may be useful for replicating technology and chemical reactions, but it has no bearing on reality itself, because the theory is founded on the fallacy of quantum state superposition.

Great presentation as usual from Dr Jason Lisle! Love his teachings and love for the Lord and God's Word. 👍🏼🙏🏼✝️

Thumbs up for the presentation and the movie! The movie was really well made and very informative.

The flood was worldwide but not global, global only in the sense that all humans on the globe were drowned, but all humans were in one location.

Perhaps the fallen angels (in Gen 6) were trying to do what God eventually did in bringing about Jesus’ in His humanity, i.e., they were trying to copy God, to be like Him, just as scripture attributes to Satan.

why would God create angels with DNA, sperm and sexual parts? That by it's self doesn't make sense. Are there female angels in heaven that they reproduce with? are there baby angels? Does the DNA mutate like ours because of he fall? Angels are ministering spirits, they would own a body they would have to either indwell possess or make a body.

God gave a harsh judgement about marrying non believers in law of Moses.

It says the spies gave a bad report. I wrote a paper on this teaching.

I have to begin this with i love Dr Lisle and his ministry lest you take the rest of this wrong. Brothers and sisters, the oldest generally being the best is not an accurate statement. It does not take into account who was doing the writing. Consider the possibility of it being written by someone who didn't like certain doctrines, or even in some cases, dogma. Might they have changed the text or left some out that did not fit what they wanted it to say? Textus Sainaiaticus and Textus Vaticanus would be two examples of this. It truly saddens me that well into this video he has given no mention of the Textus Receptus. Especially considering that it is the one most reliable using his different families of texts example. Now take into account that Textus Sainaiaticus was likely written by an Alexandra. Look to the only mention of them in God's Word in Acts 6. Does that make you want to trust them? Textus Vaticanus? With all of the unbiblical doctrines and beliefs in the Roman Catholic church. Need I say more? If you are going to use the NASB, beware of the bracketed [ ] verses. In the one I have this denotes "probably not in the best (by which they mean "oldest") manuscripts. Ignore those brackets. If you search "Maverick University why we use the KJV" on this site it will give you a very good history of how the Textus Receptus came to us and totally destroy the NIV. The below link will give you a look at what the ESV does to scripture and the type of people that were behind it. God Bless www.americanpresbyterianchurch.org/the-esv-is-a-perversion-of-the-word-of-god/

Really good! This was interesting and I enjoyed it! 👍

Sons of God absolutely does not translate any way, shape or form to being human beings. In the context and translation it can only be elohim. Otherwise, why make any sort of distinction? The angels who sinned mated with human women.