Understanding Genesis || Guest Speaker Dr. Jason Lisle
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
- Join us live as guest speaker Dr Jason Lisle shares a message on Biblical Science.
If you would like to partner with us in the ministry of Joshua Springs Calvary Chapel and invest in what the Lord is doing in our local area and around the world through giving, here are 3 ways you can donate:
1. Donate via Text Message 760 208 4040 📱
2. Through the Simple Give App to Joshua Springs (sign up at simplegive.com )
3. You can donate in person at Joshua Springs Calvary Chapel, offices open Mon-Fri 8-5 PM
🙏 If you need prayer please let us know in the comments below
FOLLOW US
►► Instagram: / joshuasprings
►► Facebook: / joshuasprings
►► TH-cam: / joshuasprings
#joshuasprings #online #churchonline #jesus #JSCC #church #live #onlinechurch
This man is amazing!! How can he be an astrophysicist AND such a wonderful Bible scholar??? Wow. He is easy to understand and answers questions before I can ask them. This video on Genesis is far more important than I had thought it was before I listened to it. I will be listening again!
It is easy to understand when you are gullible and ignorant at the same time. This sudo-scientist is a real disgrace to his field.
We miss this church so much! This place was really the highlight of our time in California. I wish we could have taken the whole campus and all the people with us
♥️♥️♥️
Hey Jason, don't tell people that genealogies are boring. then they'll believe it is boring. It's not, the genealogies are very interesting, what you need to do is show people how fun it is getting to know the genealogies. So many preachers tell people it is boring and that is a shame.
no they are boring....it is ok..genealogies show us age of earth
Wow. This was provocative, but not in a bad way. God be with you.
I wish a sermon on Job 38 as as proof of divine revelation
Thank you again
Proof to us how Job 38 is divinely inspired thank you thank
He can't prove zhit, he talks out of his rear and claims it as real.
@@LookOutForNumberOne Oh, so you can do better bro??? Go ahead and give it your best shot!!!
About 100 years after the flood, people were building cities and the tower of Babel. Please explain. There were only about 50 people on the earth.
Because it is all made up.
Jason, have you ever debated Larry Ollison? He seems to have concocted a theory ( although he claims it's Biblical) about life on earth before the 6 day creation as wr now understand it.
If there is no gap between Genesis 1:1 & 1:2, why does sin already exist before Adam and Eve were created?
I was raised as a Christian. So, I accepted the Gospels as historical records of Jesus' life. However, what the Genesis narrative tells us of the beginning aligns differently with what science teaches. So, as a result, I accepted the story of creation on faith. Later, as an adult, I read a popular science magazine article about the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and how its data reveals that our Earth and solar system may be cosmically aligned. Then came the Planck satellite confirming the WMAP data. Could this be evidence that the book of Genesis is based on historical events? Perhaps, but unfortunately, I am not a scientist and can only understand about one percent of the science. Nevertheless, According to cosmologists, one thing is evident: the alignments somehow exist! Moreover, because the data does not fit the Standard Model of Cosmology, scientists dubbed it the Axis of Evil. But, according to Genesis, the alignments would be the Axis of Beginning. So why aren't more Christians and scientists encouraged that this data is evidence that the book of Genesis may be based on facts and even historical events? And, more importantly, scientific proof that God exists.
" that our Earth and solar system may be cosmically aligned."
Aligned to what?
"the alignments would be the Axis of Beginning."
And what is an axis of beginning? Time is one-dimensional, for an axis to make sense you need at least three dimensions.
Yeees indeed!
Evidence of deep understanding: "I read a popular science article..." By the way, I am cosmically aligned with the coffee machine in the kitchen, therefore god!
I have thought long and hard about this sort of thing. Jesus is the Word made flesh. We are to believe in Jesus who is the Word of God. If someone was following Christ and decided on a field of study to become an "expert" in don't you think you might consider what your Lord thinks first?
Man says that our Earth spins at 1000 mph, "orbits" the sun at a curious 66,600 mph all while our "galaxy" supposedly hurtles through "space" at some 515,000 mph.
All this movement yet Polaris stays fixed in our sky age after age. All this movement and yet the Great Pyramids still align with Orion's Belt. We can feel movement in a car, a boat or a plane yet...do you feel like we are moving?
Over and over the Bible tells us the Earth does not move. Joshua bid the sun to stand still, not the Earth.
You can even see it when you watch the sun and moon critically.
Man lies about all sorts of things, most do not believe the Scriptures. It is best if people who claim to follow Christ don't fall into that category.
The "news" is starting to tell us that there are UFOs and extraterrestrials. The Pope says they are God's children. How are followers of Christ to answer all this?
"The coming of the lawless one will be accompanied by the working of Satan, with every kind of power, sign, and false wonder, 10and with every wicked deception directed against those who are perishing, because they refused the love of the truth that would have saved them. 11For this reason God will send them a powerful delusion so that they believe the lie, 12in order that judgment may come upon all who have disbelieved the truth and delighted in wickedness." II Thess. 2
@@jannaswanson271 Have ever even started on the long trek to becoming minimally knowledgeable about a subject, without even trying to be an expert? Have you ever noticed that when you are traveling in your car, distant things SEEM to move more slowly than bushes and posts up close? The fact is, they are the same in reference to you. It is perspective; more distant objects only SEEM to move more slowly. As we hurtle through space, all the movements in space are the same, but we perceive the more distant ones less. An object 20 feet away seems to zoom by faster than an object at 500 yards and much faster than one about 430 light years away, or hundreds of trillions of miles away. But the real movement is the same. --- I live in a republic whose founding fathers deemed it preferable to not have lords to rule over us. I make all decisions on my own without consulting a dour feudal lord.
No point in trying to understand what never happened.
This is the go-to, when scientists can't do any more science, they resort to religion for their income.
I agree.
The primary responsibility for the reason the world is in the condition it's in today is because of the churches....the pastors have refused to teach God's Law, Torah, and instead have taught a doctrine of devils which says the Law is done away with....THIS IS FOUND NOWHERE IN SCRIPTURE!!!....judgment is coming first to the house of God, then the world.
Hebrews 8:12-13 KJVS
[12] For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more. [13] In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
Has anyone heard how plants survived the flood?
interesting question. one theory I have is they brought plants on the arc. the herbivores and omnivores had to eat something. maybe they had extras. Noah did make a vineyard
Yes, they held their breath via divine intervention. LMFAO
there were floating masses of debris and vegetation as there are in any large flood.
If you understand science, that's good.
If you understand the supernatural to the extent of trying to make it natural, or claiming that's natural, ...that's bad.
Science doesn't prove anything other than what happens when you apply real world rules, ... not your personal rules.
You all should be in bliss, living in your world of your making.
But you never will be.....not until everyone sees through your eyes.
Of course Abraham, God's chosen man to be the "Father of Nations" had several wives, concubines and slaves.....have a think
Could you elaborate on what you mean? It seems like you're replying to something, but there's no mention of what.
Genisis is history, but not precise history to be taken completely literally.
How did you come to that conclusion? Especially if you watched this entire presentation.
Isn't the real problem man, trying to interpret God's word . The Earth is older than the new creation timeliness. And the Bible says so..2 Thessalonian ch 2v13
Does this man ever put himself up for a debate or does he just preach to his flock
@destroyingdhwh1493 Deluded in the extreme pathetic
@destroyingdhwh1493 Oh dear you seem angry very strange description of evolution when there is a staggering amount of evidence available. Take it your Christian creationist, seems that word would be more appropriate when there is zero evidence for that theory
Dr Lisle believes humans descended from Adam and Eve. Really! What sort of science is that?
He makes good points. or show specically where he is wrong.
God did not create time, time is a symptom of separation from God. Time is relevant only to the creation during which God is working out his will and purposes to eradicate sin as a nature.. Time did not exist prior to Ezekiel 28:11-19 and Isaiah 14:13,14. And there is no time after the judgements are fulfilled.
Science simply tries to explain how God created. Science can be wrong.
Timescale is not mentioned in Genesis. Millions of years or thousands of years is not the issue. Genealogies, names and ages, have a spiritual meaning. For example the number of generations is deliberately chosen, and not necessarily 'historical'.
Adam and Eve are described for you to as a mirror. You are Adam and Eve.
Did God create Adam and Eve as adults? Is God a wizzard or sorcerer? No. As creationist we should give a good scientific alternative for evolution.
Reading the Bible is not a matter of taking everything litterally.
Jesus says His words are spirit and life.
Man was created in the image and likeness of God.
So much of the Bible is 'image and likeness ', spiritual.
Adam is men taken from the earth.
The Hebrew Bible is 'historically ' written because God is a reality within our history. That does not mean that Scripture is litterally videocamera history, as if someone had a videocamera and recorded what happend.
Speaking about God and His Kingdom, about the reality of Above, is only possible by way of 'image and likeness '.
God and Jesus speak to us in terms of image and likeness.
The definition of 'day' is "light". "And God called the light day", verse 5. Not our day of 24 hours. The light of God is 'day' .
There is a fundamental lack of sensitivity for the spiritual and metaforical meaning of Scripture within the narrow creationist view.
"Death before sin"
Only if you read Genesis chronologically. But the narrative of Adam (man taken from the earth= adamah) and Eve is our story.
Evil and sin exist from the beginning. Genesis 1 sanctifies Gods Name; death and meat eating animals are not part of Gods Kingdom, are not kosher..
"Science simply tries to explain how God created."
Nope. Science explains without god. What it can not explain is object to research. Philosophers of science discuss if there are areas like "Why there is something instead of nothing." that science will never be able to explain. Theologians think they know the answer - but never gave a good explanation for their belief.
Christ was a creationist who believed the 7 24 hour day week of genesis so..
:) I'll side with Christ
@@tedrowell659 And why should a Jewish rabbi without any education in natural sciences be an authority in the field of cosmology? Seems quite absurd, if I think about it.
Unfortunately this man has forsaken his scientific credentials through his relentless quest to place the Bible generally, and the book of Genesis specifically,at the centre of all his work. The same gentleman has publicly admitted to “burying” his creationist position while undertaking his academic qualifications. He lacked the courage of his convictions during that time, possibly fearing the consequences for his academic success should fellow academics learn of his determination to give priority to Genesis over the rigour of science..
What is the point of your comment? What purpose does it serve?
@@gerryjohnson294 It´s a longer and substantiated explanation for the obvious: Dr. Lisle is a liar and deceiver.
There is good in science, in spite of the fact that is was discovered by secularists. After all, God created the substance and principles of science (laws, consistency, predictable, reproducible). So then, what is “wrong” with learning those principles from secularists?
@@gerryjohnson294
The point I am making is perfectly clear. Can you not grasp it?
@@mmarciniak I agree with your conclusion but I wonder why you speak of "secularists". There are Christians, believers of other faiths and agnostics/atheists among in the scientific community. The dividing line between them and people like Lisle is not defined by faith but by decency - scientist are not stating ridiculous and objectively wrong claims.
Con man same as Hovind