I really enjoyed the show. The point of entertainment is to be entertaining, and the show does this. It fits in the universe, it’s fun, and good: it’s just crazy to me that people still hate this much
Than it’s no different than porn, or just pressing a button to stimulate your dopamine receptor; Fallout as a piece of art had higher standards and goals
@@donniedewitt9878Yeah touch grass bro, I may only have played fallout 4 and 76, but the series fit pretty well inside the lore and fallout current aesthetics. The characters, the factions the details, vault-tec, and the lore and connections between past events. It's true that they invented some things, like the thing that keeps ghouls from getting feral but apart from that, most of the things are well done and also they added like game hints, that only fallout players would understand. And also some things that only loremasters would know, like the drig that transforms someone into a ghoul. It was a good adaptation and whether you like it or not the lore is now expanded and will continue expanding in the next season and then the next fallout game.
The thing that makes fallout great is the lore. This show basically ruins the lore and makes what happened in new vegas obsolete. if you idiots just played fallout 4 you can gtfo
Returning to the lore itself, while the Fallout series is often praised for its rich and diverse lore, the reality is that considering the IP has been around for so many years, its lore is actually quite sparse. Looking through the entries of Bethesda's Fallout, aside from Fallout 3, which added a certain amount of content, many entries merely continue past content. Some of these settings should not have been directly reused. To continue using past settings, Fallout 4's wiki pages actually contain a lot of community-created content. For instance, power armor in Fallout 1, 2, Tactics, and Van Buren was depicted as an extension of the body, visually transforming an ordinary person into a He-Man-like figure, which is clearly different from the current design. These changes have been directly overlooked. These factors also contribute to the communication barriers between lore enthusiasts and regular players.
Idc about anything else aside from the fact that they did all that work to put lore in the games implying it was china or Maybe some kind of hack but still china and now it’s just simple vault tech just like that bc of a 3 min clip
Bruh why is this in my recommendations lmao..I ain't watching this whole thing but after watching the show I decided to give it a shot after being recommended it and hearing about it my whole life and played NV, 2, and a little London, and Sonora. It's a nice entry point
Regardless of whether they like it or not, once it is released, the purpose often involves seeking validation. After the community has been intentionally or unintentionally divided into two factions, gaining recognition from one side becomes a crucial choice for casual players or onlookers considering getting involved. Pointing out issues while risking being labeled as a nerd and having to understand previous installments and various development stories beforehand does not meet the needs of new players and onlookers.
Another reason is the setting on the West Coast. For many people, the West Coast is a place they have only learned about in fragments from comment sections. Most people do not empathize with any specific faction, so if something that doesn't align with the lore appears, they might just think, "That's the West Coast." Another reason stems from discussions about the plot of Fallout: New Vegas (FNV). Some people watch with the mindset of "Let's see how badly the NCR's civilization will fall apart!" In places where no one cares, characters like Lyons and his daughter from Fallout 3 are simply "dead," and no one pays attention. Bethesda's depiction of the Church of Atom using "the power of Cthulhu and power armor" to massacre people in the Commonwealth in their board games also goes unnoticed. These elements generate no discussion because they completely lack any buzz.
It's because even the people who claim to "love" Fallout don't give even an iota of a shit about the integrity of the franchise, not even the Bethesda side of Fallout, to them the entire franchise boils down to literally *just* the aesthetic and nothing else.
The Fallout show is half-decent at the very best. It isn't well written, not at all, and it's not a bad show for reasons that some anti-woke TH-camrs came up with. It's bad simply on the basis of flawed writing and disrespect towards the universe of Fallout. If anyone is interessed in detailed analysis of that, I'd reccomend watching MauLer's and EFAP's coverage of it. It's actually funny how flawed this show is and how so many people just don't care about it or give it a pass.
The airing of the TV series has increased discussions about "Fallout: Van Buren." Unfortunately, it has been used as a shield, misleading others with fabricated information to give some individuals a chance to save face.
I recommend the Chris Avallone review of the series so far. He found it generally underwhelming with a lot of holes and weird decisions, but amusing at times. I share that opinion.
You see, you're making the mistake of assuming that the production team ever had any intention of respecting the original setting. To them it's all "ancient nerd loser trash". Them making the show is their way of saying "You see this_ This is ours now, give us your money now! And if you don't like it you're problematic.".
@@BaronofCaring From what I saw through promos the props like power armor looked good and fans would enjoy them. Im more critical because Bethesda let me down so bad this generation.
@kevo300 agreed it has some good visuals but seen together and with some iffy performances holding huge parts together it is a shame really. No energy weapons even!
Based on the reviews of the TV series, the community's criticism of "Bethesda's Fallout storylines being poor" isn't merely negative. Instead, it has led to a certain shift in public opinion, resulting in some forgiveness regarding plot consistency issues, aligning with their target audience. The community's path dependency is also a factor, essentially reflecting the sentiment: "We are players still engaging in purely single-player games in 2024. We had games to be proud of in the past, and we want the same for the future." The failure of Starfield has undoubtedly intensified the community's urgency to seek something they can be proud of.
Fallout 3 was my first Fallout game also. Sad to see the direction the franchise is heading in. However, i still love it and will continue buying/watching whatever shit they bring out next
Instead of her father, I would have preferred if her new husband was the one taken captive instead. And when she finally finds him, it turns out he actually likes being out in the wasteland and has become the leader of the raiders who captured him. So in the end the conflict becomes one of a good Vault Dweller vs an evil Vault Dweller with all the conflict and symbolism that entails.
Would she really risk going after some random dude though? They are afraid of the outside world and for her father she was willing to risk it, but for some glorified sperm donor? I don’t think she’d risk her health in the same way.
@@lenibeni7421 If they actually like each other and she’s going to save her new husband, yeah. Kind of like how Hans was in _Frozen_ with her playing Anne.
@@ternative That the show is piece of shit, and I'm mocking it by spitting every stupid shit which blinks in my head at given moment. Why, something nah there;)?
Yeah I am not a halo fan but I’ve tried to get into the lore of halo just out of respect for the franchise and the IP itself and I can understand the disappointment with the Halo TV show from badass master chief to whatever the hell master cheeks is suppose to be. It’s really sad how both our franchises both fallout and Halo have fallen.
this is actually kinda fair character criticism
White man has been here
How can you tell ?
Hour long video essay on fallout bullsh*t
Tf does that have to do with white men
@@TheEvilTH-camit’s a meme bro
Don't forget: Watched head doesn't get eaten by ants.
how do i get fallout discourse slop out of my recommended
Pray to the gods
honestly I despise this fandom well to be specific this side of the fandom. fucking hate that youtube is just full of the worst aspects of it.
Stop watching it.
the three dots next to the videos title and then click "not interested"
Commenting on it sure doesn’t help
I really enjoyed the show. The point of entertainment is to be entertaining, and the show does this. It fits in the universe, it’s fun, and good: it’s just crazy to me that people still hate this much
Than it’s no different than porn, or just pressing a button to stimulate your dopamine receptor; Fallout as a piece of art had higher standards and goals
@@donniedewitt9878did bro just compare the fallout tv show to pornographic films? 💀🤦🏽♂️ You need to touch cement
@@donniedewitt9878Yeah touch grass bro, I may only have played fallout 4 and 76, but the series fit pretty well inside the lore and fallout current aesthetics. The characters, the factions the details, vault-tec, and the lore and connections between past events. It's true that they invented some things, like the thing that keeps ghouls from getting feral but apart from that, most of the things are well done and also they added like game hints, that only fallout players would understand. And also some things that only loremasters would know, like the drig that transforms someone into a ghoul. It was a good adaptation and whether you like it or not the lore is now expanded and will continue expanding in the next season and then the next fallout game.
@@-The_PhantomMakes sense that you’d say that since you’ve only played Fallout 4.
The thing that makes fallout great is the lore. This show basically ruins the lore and makes what happened in new vegas obsolete. if you idiots just played fallout 4 you can gtfo
Returning to the lore itself, while the Fallout series is often praised for its rich and diverse lore, the reality is that considering the IP has been around for so many years, its lore is actually quite sparse. Looking through the entries of Bethesda's Fallout, aside from Fallout 3, which added a certain amount of content, many entries merely continue past content. Some of these settings should not have been directly reused. To continue using past settings, Fallout 4's wiki pages actually contain a lot of community-created content. For instance, power armor in Fallout 1, 2, Tactics, and Van Buren was depicted as an extension of the body, visually transforming an ordinary person into a He-Man-like figure, which is clearly different from the current design. These changes have been directly overlooked.
These factors also contribute to the communication barriers between lore enthusiasts and regular players.
12:45 we don’t have to worry about the ghoul being filled with holes because ghouls just auto heal apparently lol
20:47 Maximus felt more like a Player Character in power armor than a member of the BoS.
Idc about anything else aside from the fact that they did all that work to put lore in the games implying it was china or Maybe some kind of hack but still china and now it’s just simple vault tech just like that bc of a 3 min clip
But let’s not kid ourselves.
The next game is going to directly contradict that and say it is aliens because Emil thought it would be a funny quest.
Bruh why is this in my recommendations lmao..I ain't watching this whole thing but after watching the show I decided to give it a shot after being recommended it and hearing about it my whole life and played NV, 2, and a little London, and Sonora. It's a nice entry point
sonora is great! have you should totally play the other total conversions like fallout nevada! (and fallout one my beloved obviously )
Regardless of whether they like it or not, once it is released, the purpose often involves seeking validation. After the community has been intentionally or unintentionally divided into two factions, gaining recognition from one side becomes a crucial choice for casual players or onlookers considering getting involved. Pointing out issues while risking being labeled as a nerd and having to understand previous installments and various development stories beforehand does not meet the needs of new players and onlookers.
Can you do an analysis of Sodaz fallout. I think it’s a better alternative to the Amazons fallout TV show.
oh sunburst? I would love to it has so much promise
Another reason is the setting on the West Coast. For many people, the West Coast is a place they have only learned about in fragments from comment sections. Most people do not empathize with any specific faction, so if something that doesn't align with the lore appears, they might just think, "That's the West Coast."
Another reason stems from discussions about the plot of Fallout: New Vegas (FNV). Some people watch with the mindset of "Let's see how badly the NCR's civilization will fall apart!" In places where no one cares, characters like Lyons and his daughter from Fallout 3 are simply "dead," and no one pays attention. Bethesda's depiction of the Church of Atom using "the power of Cthulhu and power armor" to massacre people in the Commonwealth in their board games also goes unnoticed. These elements generate no discussion because they completely lack any buzz.
It's because even the people who claim to "love" Fallout don't give even an iota of a shit about the integrity of the franchise, not even the Bethesda side of Fallout, to them the entire franchise boils down to literally *just* the aesthetic and nothing else.
The Fallout show is half-decent at the very best. It isn't well written, not at all, and it's not a bad show for reasons that some anti-woke TH-camrs came up with. It's bad simply on the basis of flawed writing and disrespect towards the universe of Fallout. If anyone is interessed in detailed analysis of that, I'd reccomend watching MauLer's and EFAP's coverage of it. It's actually funny how flawed this show is and how so many people just don't care about it or give it a pass.
The airing of the TV series has increased discussions about "Fallout: Van Buren." Unfortunately, it has been used as a shield, misleading others with fabricated information to give some individuals a chance to save face.
Vanburen looked like it was gonna change the atmosphere of the game too imo but just in way different direction than Bethesda
I recommend the Chris Avallone review of the series so far. He found it generally underwhelming with a lot of holes and weird decisions, but amusing at times. I share that opinion.
@@kotzpenner i have read that review and really gel with it in many places
I see fallout, i like. Idc what it is, as long as its fallout i love it. Even fallout 4
You see, you're making the mistake of assuming that the production team ever had any intention of respecting the original setting. To them it's all "ancient nerd loser trash". Them making the show is their way of saying "You see this_ This is ours now, give us your money now! And if you don't like it you're problematic.".
Source?
Bro you don’t really need a source for this, it’s just this guy’s interpretation of the show’s intent, he ain’t writing an essay.
@@MiguelGellida-hc8vf I'm not a bro
Bro, dude, whatever man, you got my point. Don’t argue over semantics.
I couldnt get past the halfway mark on the first episode.
@kevo300 i had to self medicate (booze) to finish it, but everyone I spoke to said they emjoyed it massively. I can't imagine how
@@BaronofCaring From what I saw through promos the props like power armor looked good and fans would enjoy them. Im more critical because Bethesda let me down so bad this generation.
@kevo300 agreed it has some good visuals but seen together and with some iffy performances holding huge parts together it is a shame really. No energy weapons even!
@@BaronofCaringbc they dont care about or have knowledge about the lore
@MattyB7 you aren't wrong but it is cathartic to complain about it
Based on the reviews of the TV series, the community's criticism of "Bethesda's Fallout storylines being poor" isn't merely negative. Instead, it has led to a certain shift in public opinion, resulting in some forgiveness regarding plot consistency issues, aligning with their target audience. The community's path dependency is also a factor, essentially reflecting the sentiment: "We are players still engaging in purely single-player games in 2024. We had games to be proud of in the past, and we want the same for the future." The failure of Starfield has undoubtedly intensified the community's urgency to seek something they can be proud of.
Fallout Bethesda is unplayable trash. FO3, FO4 and F76 are all utter garbage
the fuck are you talking about. why does it have to be some weird schizo shit people can like what you dont.
Fallout 3 was my first Fallout game also. Sad to see the direction the franchise is heading in. However, i still love it and will continue buying/watching whatever shit they bring out next
Speech: 2
Its what got me into Fallout tho.
@@Rose-yx6jq well hopefully you can go forward knowing there is more fruitful offerings
Instead of her father, I would have preferred if her new husband was the one taken captive instead.
And when she finally finds him, it turns out he actually likes being out in the wasteland and has become the leader of the raiders who captured him. So in the end the conflict becomes one of a good Vault Dweller vs an evil Vault Dweller with all the conflict and symbolism that entails.
Would she really risk going after some random dude though?
They are afraid of the outside world and for her father she was willing to risk it, but for some glorified sperm donor? I don’t think she’d risk her health in the same way.
@@lenibeni7421 If they actually like each other and she’s going to save her new husband, yeah.
Kind of like how Hans was in _Frozen_ with her playing Anne.
“The Bethesdabots hated him, for he spoke the truth”
Best show of the current day, and you're nitpicking... Hater.
"Current day" how far we have fallen for this slob being considered good.
You need to watch more shows lmaoo
@@ternative Not even for a pile of money. I was just trolling ;]
@@MayaWu44 wtf does this even mean
@@ternative That the show is piece of shit, and I'm mocking it by spitting every stupid shit which blinks in my head at given moment. Why, something nah there;)?
Fallout "fans" crying over this show is madness... try being a halo fan💀
Yeah I am not a halo fan but I’ve tried to get into the lore of halo just out of respect for the franchise and the IP itself and I can understand the disappointment with the Halo TV show from badass master chief to whatever the hell master cheeks is suppose to be. It’s really sad how both our franchises both fallout and Halo have fallen.
mans made a 1.5 hour long vid yapping about fallout to get a 49/51 like to dislike ration
Whooooo caresssssssss
So why the fuck are you here then?
Apparently, they do.