I have pre-ordered *Sony A7S III* amzn.to/309gc8B , so yes, there will be a review. I have to buy it like a regular person to review it, so availability of my review depends on the shipping date. *Fuji XT4 vs Panasonic GH5* - Fujifilm X-T4 is the new GH5? - bit.ly/FujiXT4vsPanasonicGH5
here are the reason i want to pick the XT4 over the A7III even tho it was my first choice One of the most important aspect for me at least is the feel of the camera, other than the "vintage look" when i went to my store to see how both felt i litterally fell in love with the XT4 handling/ergonomics (call it the way you want) it is obviously totally subjective so gotta get your hands on both before you decide to go for one or the other Then as you explained in this video the A7III is litterally the king of auto focus at this price point and there is a wider variety of lens which can be a good or a bad thing really quickly for example being obsessed with the latest tech or the latest lenses or whatever, with a reduced choice if you pick the right lenses for the job you cannot over think it For my lens selection i'll start with the 23 and the 35mm f/2 (for both) maybe the 16-80 (24-120) f4 that could be a good all in one lense. And if i ever need a wider lens than that then i'll see i'll also be using my 750D, wich will allow me to use my 35mm for portrait while i use an other lense on the 750D like my old 70-200 f4 or maybe a new lense who knows i want to reduce what i carry as much as possible and IF possible i'd like to be able to shoot most of my work with 1/2 lenses. and i won't even talk about long terms economy when you only buy 2 or 4 lenses max compared to the prices of most glass you can find for the E-mount. After that to be even more annoying, the flipping screen is something i love on my 750D so i love the fact that you have it on the XT4, the 2 SD that are the same is also a good point for the XT4 Here is what i plan on shooting most of the time: Street photography, Weddings, Automotive, portraits, maybe a little bit of video?, landscape. in terms of setting i'll mostly be using the single point focus unless i do portraits (unless eye auto focus doesnt handle well even in a simple portrait session) panning shot same stuff, single point + Continuous auto focus and that's it you good to go It's actually the only review i found that was truly realistic and wasnt biased so huge kudo to you, even to this day this video is still helpfull Btw if i wrote all that monologue it's also to put "on paper" the reason of why i'm going with fuji cause it is still quite a lot of money for someone like me but if i want to get started with professional work that's the direction i'll follow :D tbh i'm sure the a7III would be a better option when it come to professional work but at the end of the day, the menus, the ergonomics and many other little details make me feel like i'm gonna regret it if i go to sony there is a few others but i think the main part is here :D if you are still reading, thanks first of all and i hope you'll have an amazing day and that you'll be able to go out and shoot, cause at the end that's what truly matters right :D have fun guys and feel free to share what you think :D
Good talk👏🏽👏🏽, i got xt4 for the same reasons and tbh it’s abaaang for buck. The autofocus tho is good but not sony level and sometimes it annoys me but overall the ergonomics and overall experience with it is phenomenal, for real I didn’t enjoy a camera as much as the fuji.
this is so weird hahahah, im also upgrading from a 750D and trying to choose between these two cameras (leaning towards the fuji). this self-help review thing is also exactly something i'd make for myself hahahah
same! i like the ergonomics of the fuji, but the videographic ability of the sony is sooo good too (more balanced between video and photo than the fuji)
@@davi_brt I did, I went with Fuji XT-4. Bang for buck (at the time I bought it) it seemed to be the better deal. I have now seen the A7III go for LESS than the XT-4 in the recent EOFY sales! So it's still a hard decision for many I think! I have been really happy with the Fuji tho, and as long as I stick to fast primes I feel the APS-C issue isn't an issue. Good luck!
@@SummersSnaps hello Eddy, thanks for the feedback. In my country the Fuji Is still cheaper, but not for so much Money. What do you think about the fuji RAW files? Regarding the ISO and Dynamic range, do you feel yourself limited by the apsc?
@@davi_brt I come from a Pentax K-1, so I have been spoiled for dynamic range and ISO, but really the XT-4 has impressed me, it's enough. I still have my K-1 and medium format 645D, so for me I wasn't looking at an entire system swap, but rather just rounding out my tool bag with something a little better for AF and 'capture the moment' work. I would still use my K-1 for landscape use (and likely still would even if I had the FF Sony). One thing that has impressed me and that I didn't factor into the purchasing decision is the Fujisims and the rather indepth customisation it offers to providing something very pleasing SooC. This has been a huge relief to me, allowing me to juggle work (where RAW is necessary often) and 'fun' shooting whereby SooC is often enough or 90% there. You might find this recent video I did interesting as I touch on this subject; th-cam.com/video/ez4fQzr4lWs/w-d-xo.html
Amazing review, made my life really easy in choosing X-T4 over A7III. So the key takeaway is that if you are looking for a camera to shoot videos primarily like myself then XT-4 is for you. I was looking for a camera to shoot short documentaries and short films. The fact that X-T4 gives you 4K60p, FHD 120p & 240p and 10 bit video in such a small package at this price is a deal of the century and on top of all that X-T4 gives you very nominal crop factor which is very much acceptable and can be easily managed while framing a shot. For video shooters X-T4 is s a much better choice as a B-camera while main camera being a low light beast like A7Sii aur BMPCC 4K, Canon 5D MkIV, C100 MkII etc. There is a reason that DP review updated its hybrid camera buying guide placing X-T4 at no 1 and A7III at 2nd. Given the video specs of X-T4 it is clearly targeting enthusiast video shooters. Also in his review Hugh Brownstone calls the Fujifilm X-T4 the best balanced and least compromised camera on the market! So if you are looking for a mirrorless for shooting videos then close your eyes and go for X-T4. Though not as vast as Sony's glass collection, there are enough Fuji X mount glass for you at decent pricing. I bought my X-T4 with 16-80 f4 kit lens on 23rd July and have been using it daily, quality is amazing. Will post a short doc on my channel entirely shot on this camera by end of September.
Thank you, I'm glad that it was helpful! It still depends on what kind of video are you shooting. Some people may prefer A7 III because of the autofocus or full frame sensor for example. As I have explained, I don't think that there is overall clear winner.
The Hybrid Shooter there actually is if you looking into a more cinematic footage and don’t want your colours to fall apart when graded. 10bit X-T4 is the one. Sony’s colour is nowhere near.
@@maxkitaev3524 Not really. The whole 10-bit thing is very overdramatized by spec warriors. In reality there is very few people who can take advantage of 10-bit codec. 10-bit is definitely nice thing to have, but nothing is falling apart with Sony. Especially if you use s-gamut3.cine and Cine4.
The Hybrid Shooter i don’t think so. I had GH4 and A7S. I could clearly say that skintone and skies would have cracked into colorful pixels although this doesn’t happens to C200 or Blackmagic footage. So 10bit is not a made up spec.
I have a Sony A7 System (A7rii & A7iii) and a Fuji System (GFX 50S medium format). Both are highly capable systems and you can’t go wrong with either. On paper (and in your mind), the Sony usually pulls ahead and is a great all-purpose tool. The Fuji (X and GFX) systems are incredibly capable and subjectively much more enjoyable to use due to the manual dedicated buttons and dials - in particular, if you are a street shooter, you can quickly change shutter/aperture/ISO settings *before* you even turn on the camera. I picked the Sony because I have a large number of Leica lenses that I adore and after several successful projects/books/exhibitions, I’m now superstitiously attached to. If it wasn’t for that, and if I was starting over again, I would pick the Fuji X system. When I recommend cameras to friends, I usually recommend the Fuji X system.
I was deciding between Sony A7iii and Fuji XT4 and went with Fuji due to the better design and smaller kit size. I am attracted to the Sony lens ecosystem, and am waiting for the A7iv to get into it. Excellent video.
@@bioliv1 That's a total myth spread by competitors. They have 24mm F1.4 extremely sharp from corner to corner and the best 12-24mm F2.8 on the market. That is a proof that E-mount is not limiting in any way. Just the opposite, it enables them to make very compact lenses and have APS-C system without awkwardly large mount like Z50.
@@TheHybridShooter The RF-mount has 12 new contacts, so that it can transfer mora data than the fewer and older contacts on the e-mount. And maybe the larger Z-mount can make sharper lenser cheaper at fast apertures? The new 12-24 G-master is very expensive.
@@bioliv1 Number of contacts doesn't matter at all. E-mount lenses can transfer all that needs to be transferred. It is just metadata, you don't need thunderbolt connection for that. As I have said, 24mm F1.4 is as challenging to make as it gets and it is perfect, so no.
@ZAI Lovesyou In your dreams .... before you press the shutter button in Z6 I will have already done 150 pictures on my SD card ready to post in jpges :))
If Sigma and Tamron start adapting lenses for Fuji then we'll have a real battle. I've been eyeing the A7iii for a long time but that damn Fuji is just so sexy!
thank you, very good comparison! I would be very interested in a detailed image quality comparison between APS-C and Full Frame (Tamron 28-75 vs Fuji 16-80 or 18-55) to see how much is the difference there. I recently moved to Fuji and every day I like the system a bit more. The menu is much better than many people say in my opinion (coming from Nikon). Would you recommend the 16-80 lens for allround landscape photography? (16-55 is too heavy for me)
@@TheHybridShooter photography is subjective and personally I had that opinion. However since changing to Capture One, the raw conversion definitely brings out what the lens is capable of. The IQ in most lenses are only noticeable at pixel peeping levels.
@James Borley Not really, sharpness is perfectly measurable, there is nothing subjective about that. There are no issues with RAW processing in the latest versions of LR. The corners are just too soft to call the optical qualities very good. It still a good promise between optical qualities and versatility.
Great video. Personally, I sold my Sony A7iii, and bought the Fuji x-t3, now I own the Fuji X-t4. I am super happy making the switch. Basically I feel the Fujis are more 'fun' to shoot with, and find my self using the Fuji a lot more than with my previous Sonys. And I guess that's why we own cameras.
Anders Bråthen well most of the filmmakers would agree that a7 iii is more of a professional camera.. What made you switch to a worse camera? (Considered by the majority)
@@pavelvitek766 OK. I don't see it that way ;-) Too me full frame has only 2 advantages, shooting wide angle, somewhat better results in low light. Other than that, I see only benefits with the the non full frame Fuji X-T4. There is a strong tendency among the "majority" to overrate the importance of "full frame". Either way, both of these cameras are in the same "range" and both will provide excellent results. Your professionalism will not be impacted in any way based on which one of these two cameras you own. The Fuji provides me with a wider range of use, which make me do "more", and being able to earn more because of that.
yeah, because of 4k 60p i will probably go XT4 i guess !!! Soon XD so, that can make Slow motion right? filmming 4k 60p and play back like 24p or 30p. I am still researching for getting my Bad ass Camera
@Fourie Krause I'm actually considering Sony for how excellent the very cost effective Tamron 2.8 options are... even the Tammy variable 28-200 starts at 2.8. Ibis on the X-T4 is far better though.
Thanks a lot for this video! I've watched it at least 3 times. I mainly want to use the camera for photography, especially landscape. I also want to take it on vacation with me. I'm deciding between Fuji XT4 with 18-55 2.8 and Sony a7iii with Tamron 28-75 2.8. I won't need a lot more lenses for what I do. It's important for me that the camera makes good photos in many conditions and that I don't have a problem with the weather (e.g. overheating). If it's okay to ask, which would be your favourite for me? Picture quality seems to be better with the Sony. The Fuji's lens (total package with the body) is shorter/friendlier for on the go? Greetings
I’m Fuji (X-T20) user, I really love Fuji with friendly users settings. But, Sony A7 iii is fckn awesome. This video really made me confuse, should I upgrade to X-T4 or try a new one Sony A7 iii.
As mostly street photographer, and after having Canon, Sony and Fuji I just ordered the X-T4. What I must love of it is the fuji jpegs you are able to create and all the film simulations that you can easily tweak to reduce a lot the workflow. The only thing i hate of x-t4 is that horrible screen i prefer the two axis screen than the flip screens.
Love it! I hate how Fuji keeps making their X-T cameras larger and heavier (and more expensive?), so it's only right to compare it to the Sony. X-T4 at the start of its product cycle and A7III at the end of its cycle, yet still a close battle.
@@TheHybridShooter absolutely, and they've always got the X-T30 line for the more compact option (I've got an X-T20). It'll be interesting to see what they do with the X-T40 since a new sensor and Ibis are probably not on the cards.
@@TheHybridShooter hello sir which should i buy for wedding filmaking XT-4 A7iv or the Canon r6 i have ef lens but i have one Fujifilm 35mm f2 lens too pls recommend me the best Thanks
I find your reviews are pretty thorough and cover all the bases. . I felt the A7 iii is a better choice for stills and the XT4 if your first choice is videos.
It's an elaborate evaluation.excellent review. I am planning to go for XT4. What's your advise for choosing the lens as the kit lens? I get normally 18-55mm f2.8. but what's your advise for general around photography and video? Which lens to take.please advise.
A huge fan of this channel. I love how you like tilt screens over flip out. Tilts are way better, unfortunably youtubers have a big effect on camera manufactures and flip outs are going to conquer :C
Congratulations on a well balanced and informative review. I moved to the A7iii from the Nikon D500 because I wanted full frame. Image resolution is better but it's taking me a while to get used to the menu system which is way too clunky. The D500 was much more straight forward. I would very much like to see your recommendation for how best to set up the Sony with the latest 3.10 firmware update. I mainly shoot landscapes, portraits, pets and street photos. The ability to lock Tracking Eye AF for Humans and Animals is something I would really like to see.
Had the XT3 for long time,great video camera,great codecs and 4K 60P but... I sold it and I bought 2 A7iii and boy... I know that is only 8bit codec and cannot do 4K60 but Full Frame uncropped 25P is the king... The image you get from the Sony sensor is insane...Not saying that the XT3/XT4 are not capable cameras but full frame video is awesome. Huge difference at least in my eyes
great review! I really enjoy the way you present information, very objective and honest, incredible work, keep going! Photography community can really benefit from your videos, and it feels just awesome that your way of presenting information is as objective as possible, which basically makes the community more conscious and less susceptible to marketing trends or influencers. You respect the community by doing so, and I personally respect you, great stuff!
Yet another thoughtful, even handed comparison. Thanks so much for the effort you put into your reviews. Would it make sense, now, to compare the xt4 with the g9? If that is not in your immediate plans, would you comment on that now? Thanks for all your videos.
I changed my nikon d750 for xt4 , no regrets at all. Fuji feels so good in hands and pictures are awesome. Full frame have some advantages but minor , prefer better handling and light weight . And that vintage looks 😍
Great video! One correction I'd like to make is at 15:00 you say Fuji has no f2.8 24-70mm equivalent zooms. I believe the red badge XF16-55 f2.8 is exactly that. It's more like a 24-82.5mm equivalent thanks to the cropped sensor, effectively providing a little more reach.
Maybe you can help me?? I mainly shoot car videos, think car shows and drag racing. Sometimes at night under the nights of the track.. Been trying to find a new camera setup what would you recommend as far as XT4 vs A7iii?
I currently own an A7iii, but I am considering moving down to an X-T4 due to it being smaller, and its more creative workflow (film simulation, double exposure, dials and film camera form factor.) though, i am planning to grow with either Sony or Fuji as i buy more lenses and hope to someday work as a full time photographer. I plan to shoot portraits, events, landscapes, Astro, macro, product photography, basically everything. I want to shoot as an enthusiast, as well as a professional with my camera. Is the X-T4s smaller size and retro feel worth sacrificing the superior AF, DR, and ISO performance that Sony has, and may continue to build in the future? Can Fuji offer enough as a working photography camera for all listed scenarios with the lenses they offer now/the sensor size itself? Or will it suffer in many of the categories listed that i will be shooting due to APSC, therefor I should keep my FF A7iii and admire the Fuji from a distance.. knowing it may not be everything I need for work. I know there’s less bokeh on APS-C, and more grain in low light, I know that moving down to an APSC will only gain me benefits ergonomically, not photographically. Just want some insight from either you, or the community. Thanks in advance, everyone!
Those are very complex and philosophical questions, so I am afraid that the answer to all of them is that it depends on your preferences, specific use case and what is sufficient quality of output for you... X-T4 isn't any smaller though, equivalent lenses are also roughly the same size.
Your Sony A7III is an amazing camera. However, it can be great to try out other systems. It's a bit like dipping your toes into Mac vs PC, except with cameras you have quite a few more options. The Fuji is a ton of fun to shoot with, especially if you are just rattling off JPEGs with the odd RAW photo thrown in when you know you might need it. If you are considering Fuji, for portrait consider the 50mm F2, the new 50mm F1 (!), KamLan 50mm F1.1 II, Rokinon 12mm F2 (for astro), or the Fujifilm 10-24mm. The older Fujifilm X-H1 and X-T3 should be considerations as there sensors are just a smidge behind the X-T4, and they can be purchased cheap. Even X-T2 is very good. Perhaps you maybe be able to keep both systems? Build a small Fuji kit with older body, a couple lens. Or just buy an older Fujifilm X100F, X100T, X70, XF10 to have a second body that is all-in-one. very slim, and that you use for fun.
@@urbanrunoff not at all . Fuji photo is near to Sony full frame quality. Gh5 stills are mostly only good in professional use... Great lights/studio etc... I have seen .. Gh5 can be professional photography camera.. but I would say pricing for the photos should be lower for costumers.
I subscribed a while ago to your awesome channel. Reading your honest straight-to-the-point answers in the comments here just turned me into a lifetime subscriber. Keep doing what you do
It isn't better or worse, it is not suitable for all types of use, which is why the new X-H2S has conventional controls with PSAM dials. A lot of things matter at the end of the day, handling is just one of them.
@@TheHybridShooter my point is that if I don’t enjoy using my camera, the other features don’t matter as much. The handling of Fujis personally makes me excited to use them. Of course everyone has different preferences though.
I made this exact switch from a7iii to Fuji x-t4 and if you can have both then do it but the x-t4 offers an overall better user experience. I miss my a7iii but I feel more involved in the creation of my photos with fuji
I have gh5 and a7iii combo... Both 2 lenses.. two one prime and one zoom In both.... I feel like I have everything I need... Alll these coming new cameras are pixel picking.. don't need a damn new camera for at least 5-7 years .. I put money instead lights and audio..
@@ariruishalme4403 thank you for quick reply, have the same lenses with my GH5 plus 45mm 1.8 oly, at mom thinking of getting a7iii tamron combo and prime or two also and its encouraging to hear from happy users of such combos regards
Hardware aside, I believe Fuji wins out on software by a long shot. More aspect ratio options, focus stack options, timers(long exposures) that are customizable, film simulations (for travel pics) etc etc. It just feels well rounded and a smarter camera overall. As a a7iii user I wish Sony would improve the software features. PS: A suggestion/request. I think it would be valuable if you can compare things like this also as very few reviews go into the software features like these.
I have talked about film simulations, but Sony also has picture profiles, which as great. Other than that I haven't really found software features important enough to talk about in 15min. compatison.
Yes. Film simulations you talked about. Was just encompassing everything I could recollect. Fuji also lets us configure custom long exposure values beyond the typical 30 secs and bulb which I find great. Also, focus bracketing and 4:5,1:1 aspect ratios are great for food and product photography. Being a software engineer I believe some(not all) of these are very easy to implement but somehow Sony doesn't.
On the other hand, Fuji is missing touch tracking and custom area settings in video. Neither is great when it comes to software, Panasonic is still best in that area.
Aah. Didn't know about that. Not a video shooter. I tried stills with my friend's xt3. No idea about Panasonic either. Panasonic doesn't have much presence in India. It's all Canon, Sony and Nikon and Fuji to a lesser extent.
Hey i have a question I’m trying to get for the very first cámara don’t know which one to get Sony a7iii or fuji xt4 there both in the same Price range but the sony is Not older which one would you recommend me to start with
I love my a7iii. Looking for a second camera but a7c hasn’t convinced me 100%. Would having these cameras make a great pair for paid hybrid shoots? The a7iii to focus more on photos and the Fuji for video or should I get the a7c? Please any advice would be much appreciated!
Wow great video, if you will choose between A7c with sigma 24-70 2.8 art lens and Fufifilm xt4 with 16-55mm 2.8 WR lens, what will you choose? And why? Thanks a lot🙂
Thank you! My requirements are rather specific, so my personal choices are not very relevant. This video and A7C vs A7 III compassion should help you decide - th-cam.com/video/UXVpfRbKhOQ/w-d-xo.html
@@TheHybridShooter Thanks for the answer. I think the same, the M4/3 have no future. You can have very portable pocketeable APSC sensor cameras that can have much better image quality than a M4/3. I think for the future even the APSC market will shrink, when the cheap full frame mirrorless take the market. There will be sub $500 full frame mirrorless in the future, and the APSC will have no way to compete.
Fuji APS-C is now basically the new M43, in a good way. Downfall of M43 is mostly a fault of Oympus and Panasonic, as they failed to innovate the system. If Fuji and Sony will be more committed to APS-C, it can be around for a long time as an alternative to FF with better feature set at given price.
@@TheHybridShooter True. I think Panasonic & Olympus hit the resolution brick wall when they put 20MP sensors in their cameras. I think Panasonic saw the decline coming & that's why they invested in FF which is what seems to be on-trend at the moment. I don't see a bright future for Olympus though sadly, they should have jumped into the L-Mount Alliance with Panasonic/Sigma/Leica & the EM1-X could/should have been a FF mirrorless beast!
@Steve Ferneyhough They didn't just see the decline, they caused it by the lack of innovation. It is not something that just happened to them. There should have been GH6 with new BSI sensor and 5.3K RAW recording released in December 2019 alongside 25-62.5mm F1.7. That would have definitely prevented the decline and outsell the whole Lumix S line.
I know this is off topic but I do have a Sony a7iii and love it. I'm looking to add a second small/travel camera. Some vlogging, walking tours when travel, home tours for real estate, b-roll footage - good image quality. Go Pro 8, Osmo Pocket, Insta360 One R 1-inch? Hope to hear your recommendation!
My favorite action cameras are Insta360 One R and Osmo Pocket at the moment. 1-mod has the best image quality, but the minimal focus distance is about 80cm, so it is not suitable for vlogging.
So many great options out there ... One thing everyone must consider is how much it will cost you to upgrade your computer to edit the video from these great cameras at their highest bitrates etc.
I’m using xt3 and really want ibis since I love the look of slower shutter speeds even for street since it gives a cool look that I enjoy and now I’m stuck deciding between the xh1, xt4 or a7iii since these are the most I can afford. The good thing is that I could just live with a 2.8 zoom and maybe the 85 1.8 on Sony and I’d be happy but 2.8 on apsc leaves me with a bit to be desired … meaning I’d need to go for the sigma 1.4 primes which are like f2.1 on ff making it a rough decision. I don’t find myself being in love with my camera like some other people say they are so I’m open to potentially changing systems or just bodies, however this may be due to the fact that I currently only have the 18-55 though
For TH-camrs who shoot their own videos, which one would be a good choice? I am little worried as the sony ariii doesn't have a complete flipscreen. It's difficult to shoot without seeing urself
Hello i am fuji x-t200 user. I want to buy x-t4 or sony a7m3. I prefer clear pic and video resolution. Just for take a pic for my cat and tour, shoting star and so on... Can u recommend which one is better one? And crop over by using x-t4at the picture, still resolution is good? If then i want to buy x-t4
I'm sorry, but I prefer not to answer this kind of questions. I am camera reviewer, so I have very specific requirements, which are not very relevant to most users.
@@TheHybridShooter yeah an opinion would help but I understand where you are coming from. I have an a7iii and bought and a7c but I can’t shake the wanting to try an xt4!
I currently own the A7iii but would really like a camera with 4k 60p. The X-T4 was really tempting to me for it's video specs but wondered if I should wait to see what the A7S III offers. What are your thoughts?
@@TheHybridShooter Thanks for the reply. I was going based on the rumoured specs but I guess they could be wildly different when announced. Thanks anyway 😁
@@Dazarazmataz The A7siii is great but not really a great hybrid camera. Video its awesome but with a price tag of £3800 i dont think its a perfect choice if you do photography. I would wait till end of year i think we will see the A7iv land with super hybrid specs! Im looking to get a XT4 for video at the moment for the quality over A7iii :) Happy shooting
@@IanSnape Yeah the A7S III is more expensive than I expected it would be. The X-T4 is really tempting but have a feeling I will miss full frame, the A7IIIs 8 bit codec and low bitrate is a huge downside so I might have to see what the A7IV offers 😁
I came from the Sony a7 and a6000 and now I use the XT4 exclusively to start my TH-cam channel. The flip screen is a must for vlogs. The XT4 is just...fun to use. It makes me want to pick it up and play with it. The ergonomics are much better and the film simulations are great for video. Full frame will always have an edge, but if you're not always shooting in low light situations, it won't affect affect your creativity. At the end of the day, both cameras are top of the line and you can't go wrong with either. Great comparison!
@@TheHybridShooter another thing to consider is full frame glass and apsc glass. It's not just the budget of the camera body as those come and go, but glass stays for a long time. The Fuji XF glasses are very nice. Metal, feels solid and sharp. To get something similar with the a7 series, you'll need to increase your budget. I used to struggle with the full frame vs apsc, but now I just shoot with whatever body that makes me take my camera out more :)
@Matt Lau No. You can get compact and optically excellent 3rd party lenses for E-mount such as Samyang F1.8 primes or Tamron zooms. Those are always cheaper than Fuji counterparts and they easily outperform X-mount lenses, thanks to lower pixel density on FF sensor. E-mount is definitely more budget friendly system than Fuji XF.
All i want is the perfect camera :-) Fuji needs better autofocus and faster lenses/third party lenses. It would be the best camera. I'm on the X-T3 and suffer from these issues too.
Great vid! I have the a7iii and love it! I’m looking for a second camera and my obvious choice in my budget is an a7c. I like auto focus! But my slow mo on a7iii just seems very soft especially 120. Is Fuji xt4 something I should consider? I’m a hybrid shooter. Shoot weddings and other corporate gigs + YT
1080p video on Sony is not soft, they just use much less sharpening than other manufacturing in default settings. You can adjust that if you prefer higher sharpness.
William, I don't think you touched on the LCD screen. Does it swing around for self portraits? I will be 83 when my driver's licence expires early next year, and in the coronavirus lockdown in Victoria I need a good head shot of me to renew my licence online. I am torn between these two cameras, the Panasonic GH5, G9 and S5, and my old GH1.
I really enjoy your videos. They're extremely useful. I wanted to ask you... Do you know of any reasonable priced lenses for the XT-4 if I use it for indoor sports? (Low light, fast moving subjects) thank you!
My question is what is it like to shoot all day with these cameras? Maybe even two days in a row? Is one camera better than the other in terms of ergonomics over the long haul. Do your hands hurt at the end of the day after a thousand shots? Secondly, after a year's worth of work, how do the cameras hold up to heavy usage? Do things fall off, do the buttons and dials still work? How do the sensors hold up to dust? Sony has a bad reputation for sensor dust issues for instance. How easy is it to change camera settings in the field, after a long day on location and the perfect shot comes along requiring a major change in settings? Which camera would you lose the shot because of menus and settings complexity, buttons and dials positioning/functions? Have you ever dropped one of these little electronic marvels? What happened if you did? Can you get either one of them repaired where you live or are these just toys to be fondled and worried over all the time? One drop or bump and throw it away? Let us know!! Stay safe!
I usually cover those questions in my long term reviews, those are available for A7 III on the channel. All mirrorless cameras collect the dust the same... I have used a lot of cameras, so I am generally fine with controls on any camera expect for entry-level cameras such as M50, and I don't loose pictures because of the wrong settings. Fortunately, I have never dropped any camera and I have never had any reliability issues.
QuickRelease CLAMP @ 10:10 please: What model and brand is it (if for Arca) ? I'm much intrigued if it is just as a good solution as the ones by RRS (Many other brands are eighter "clumpsy" or otherwise not as smooth or safe in handling - to my liking.)
Did you have any chance to experience fuji gfx50r medium format camera? Despite the large sensor size and lower technical specs (slower) than most of the full frame cameras, price is very charming. It will be nice to hear your idea. Thank you.
Not yet, but I intend to do so in the future. Based on the specs and lens selection, I would only consider GFX100. I would probably just get one of 40+ MP full frame cameras with IBIS instead of GFX50R.
You said x-t4 can handle a 1 second exposure still image at 18mm no problem. What slowest shutter speed still photo would you say the a7iii’s ibis could handle?
Hello how are you? I am not a professional photographer. but photography its my passion , I am currently traveling the world on my motorcycle. and I have a Canon M50 apc-s. But I am an action photographer (motorcycle), landscape, and portrait and astrophotography. (I would like to start with wildlife too) after 2 years using my Canon. the truth I feel is slow and for action I don't like it at all. What would you recommend me? I am between the A7III or XT-4 .. for me it would be ideal to be good for everything a little. since with my trip I need everything. Thank you very much Regards
Super video, Ďakujem! Dlhsiu dobu som sa rozhodoval či si mam kupit fujifilm X-T4 (Prestupujem s Canonu) a dospel som k nazoru, ze to bude dobry krok..ešte raz dakujem
Hi there, I know this question have been asked million times but I am trying to upgrade my camera for my video business and I would really value your professional and personal advice. Would you recommend XT4 + 16-55 2.8 OR A7iii + SIGMA 24-70 f2.8? Requirement: - 80% of run and gun shooting, Event highlight video, Wedding, Yoga commercial, various B-Roll - Good IBIS : Dont wanna use Gimbal unless I really need long tracking shot - Auto focus must be good due to run and gun style Focus change has to be smooth (Some fuji lens sucks as they change focus too rapidly despite the settings in camera, especially for non-native fuji lens) - Good dynamic range and ideally a bit better in low light setting. I am concern about the JERKY behavior of the XT4 IBIS as I have seen on other youtube video. Also that full frame look with the SIGMA 24-70 f2.8 is king on the Sony, not sure if the fuji 16-55 2.8 can do this.
Unfortunately, I can't really tell you much more than what I said in the video. IBIS is not a problem on X-T4 anymore. If you want full frame look, you need a full frame camera, so A7 III might be a better choice for your.
@@TheHybridShooter thanks for your time to answer! it;'s so hard honestly, for real work, the AF is really handy, but the XT4 is more fun and the retro look haha.
I still choose the Fuji for stills. In general, the lens ecosystem is cheaper and, as a frequent traveler, I can make my X-T3 small for travel (plus use my X-System lenses with a smaller camera such as the X-T30) or make it big and "pro" for shoots with larger lenses and battery grip. It has some weaknesses compared to some FF systems, but they're easily overcome. The Fuji system serves me better for double duty for personal and pro use. Pixel peeping and small equipment differences also matter way less when you're actually out shooting and not sitting at your computer googling 'Fuji vs Sony'. The constant equipment focus in photography gets old, especially the "why I'm switching to X videos" (the reason: For clicks and views).
Well, that's completely fine, there is no need to justify it with such comments if you are really happy with the system... Fuji lenses are more expensive than full frame counterparts though.
I think the real problem with a73 is the rolling shutter jiggle. It's gross, especially combined with the ibis, and makes the camera unusable for video. The xt4 has outrageous readout speed with no perceivable jiggle. The issues with tricky lighting (sunset) and low light are definitely true negative aspects with Fuji xt4
Thank you for great Review. I am planning to buy my first mirrorless camera. I have 2 options in my mind, one is Fujifilm XT4 and other one is Sony A7C. what is your opinion.
I have an x-t4. It is very good for the body and the optics too. I am very disappointed with this camera solely because I love to take photos against the light, and the fuji does not have the ability of sony to emulate a helper with a function similar to HDR. Is this function really valid in the A7iii for shooting photos against the light? Thankyou
Yes, I don't know if I am an advanced user, I am shure a professionist. When I need This kind of picture, is more interesting to do that in camera to save time and money. You say that HDR mode is in-camera but I don't know where.
I have pre-ordered *Sony A7S III* amzn.to/309gc8B , so yes, there will be a review. I have to buy it like a regular person to review it, so availability of my review depends on the shipping date.
*Fuji XT4 vs Panasonic GH5* - Fujifilm X-T4 is the new GH5? - bit.ly/FujiXT4vsPanasonicGH5
Can't wait for that review mate! Love your reviews, keep it up mate!
@@dasbasti1990 No, and I won't get it anytime soon here in Slovakia.
You gave me a lot of clarity
You DON'T have to use an adapter for headphones on the X-T4, it is included in the vertical grip FFS
here are the reason i want to pick the XT4 over the A7III even tho it was my first choice
One of the most important aspect for me at least is the feel of the camera, other than the "vintage look" when i went to my store to see how both felt i litterally fell in love with the XT4 handling/ergonomics (call it the way you want) it is obviously totally subjective so gotta get your hands on both before you decide to go for one or the other
Then as you explained in this video the A7III is litterally the king of auto focus at this price point and there is a wider variety of lens which can be a good or a bad thing really quickly
for example being obsessed with the latest tech or the latest lenses or whatever, with a reduced choice if you pick the right lenses for the job you cannot over think it
For my lens selection i'll start with the 23 and the 35mm f/2 (for both) maybe the 16-80 (24-120) f4 that could be a good all in one lense.
And if i ever need a wider lens than that then i'll see
i'll also be using my 750D, wich will allow me to use my 35mm for portrait while i use an other lense on the 750D like my old 70-200 f4 or maybe a new lense who knows
i want to reduce what i carry as much as possible and IF possible i'd like to be able to shoot most of my work with 1/2 lenses.
and i won't even talk about long terms economy when you only buy 2 or 4 lenses max compared to the prices of most glass you can find for the E-mount.
After that to be even more annoying, the flipping screen is something i love on my 750D so i love the fact that you have it on the XT4, the 2 SD that are the same is also a good point for the XT4
Here is what i plan on shooting most of the time: Street photography, Weddings, Automotive, portraits, maybe a little bit of video?, landscape.
in terms of setting i'll mostly be using the single point focus unless i do portraits (unless eye auto focus doesnt handle well even in a simple portrait session)
panning shot same stuff, single point + Continuous auto focus and that's it you good to go
It's actually the only review i found that was truly realistic and wasnt biased so huge kudo to you, even to this day this video is still helpfull
Btw if i wrote all that monologue it's also to put "on paper" the reason of why i'm going with fuji cause it is still quite a lot of money for someone like me but if i want to get started with professional work that's the direction i'll follow :D
tbh i'm sure the a7III would be a better option when it come to professional work but at the end of the day, the menus, the ergonomics and many other little details make me feel like i'm gonna regret it if i go to sony
there is a few others but i think the main part is here :D
if you are still reading, thanks first of all and i hope you'll have an amazing day and that you'll be able to go out and shoot, cause at the end that's what truly matters right :D have fun guys and feel free to share what you think :D
Good talk👏🏽👏🏽, i got xt4 for the same reasons and tbh it’s abaaang for buck. The autofocus tho is good but not sony level and sometimes it annoys me but overall the ergonomics and overall experience with it is phenomenal, for real I didn’t enjoy a camera as much as the fuji.
Cool
this is so weird hahahah, im also upgrading from a 750D and trying to choose between these two cameras (leaning towards the fuji). this self-help review thing is also exactly something i'd make for myself hahahah
This is the first review I have seen that realistically compares the xt4 with a full frame camera. Great job and very useful information.
Very fair, well balanced, and thorough comparison. I especially like that you distinguish between personal preference and objective performance.
Thank you, I appreciate you feedback!
Man tough decision. My heart says Fuji but my head says Sony.
same! i like the ergonomics of the fuji, but the videographic ability of the sony is sooo good too (more balanced between video and photo than the fuji)
Hello Eddy! Have you taken a decision between the two cameras? I am having the same "problem"
@@davi_brt I did, I went with Fuji XT-4. Bang for buck (at the time I bought it) it seemed to be the better deal. I have now seen the A7III go for LESS than the XT-4 in the recent EOFY sales! So it's still a hard decision for many I think! I have been really happy with the Fuji tho, and as long as I stick to fast primes I feel the APS-C issue isn't an issue. Good luck!
@@SummersSnaps hello Eddy, thanks for the feedback. In my country the Fuji Is still cheaper, but not for so much Money. What do you think about the fuji RAW files? Regarding the ISO and Dynamic range, do you feel yourself limited by the apsc?
@@davi_brt I come from a Pentax K-1, so I have been spoiled for dynamic range and ISO, but really the XT-4 has impressed me, it's enough. I still have my K-1 and medium format 645D, so for me I wasn't looking at an entire system swap, but rather just rounding out my tool bag with something a little better for AF and 'capture the moment' work. I would still use my K-1 for landscape use (and likely still would even if I had the FF Sony).
One thing that has impressed me and that I didn't factor into the purchasing decision is the Fujisims and the rather indepth customisation it offers to providing something very pleasing SooC. This has been a huge relief to me, allowing me to juggle work (where RAW is necessary often) and 'fun' shooting whereby SooC is often enough or 90% there. You might find this recent video I did interesting as I touch on this subject; th-cam.com/video/ez4fQzr4lWs/w-d-xo.html
Amazing review, made my life really easy in choosing X-T4 over A7III. So the key takeaway is that if you are looking for a camera to shoot videos primarily like myself then XT-4 is for you. I was looking for a camera to shoot short documentaries and short films. The fact that X-T4 gives you 4K60p, FHD 120p & 240p and 10 bit video in such a small package at this price is a deal of the century and on top of all that X-T4 gives you very nominal crop factor which is very much acceptable and can be easily managed while framing a shot. For video shooters X-T4 is s a much better choice as a B-camera while main camera being a low light beast like A7Sii aur BMPCC 4K, Canon 5D MkIV, C100 MkII etc. There is a reason that DP review updated its hybrid camera buying guide placing X-T4 at no 1 and A7III at 2nd. Given the video specs of X-T4 it is clearly targeting enthusiast video shooters. Also in his review Hugh Brownstone calls the Fujifilm X-T4 the best balanced and least compromised camera on the market! So if you are looking for a mirrorless for shooting videos then close your eyes and go for X-T4. Though not as vast as Sony's glass collection, there are enough Fuji X mount glass for you at decent pricing. I bought my X-T4 with 16-80 f4 kit lens on 23rd July and have been using it daily, quality is amazing. Will post a short doc on my channel entirely shot on this camera by end of September.
Thank you, I'm glad that it was helpful! It still depends on what kind of video are you shooting. Some people may prefer A7 III because of the autofocus or full frame sensor for example. As I have explained, I don't think that there is overall clear winner.
24 more days
The Hybrid Shooter there actually is if you looking into a more cinematic footage and don’t want your colours to fall apart when graded. 10bit X-T4 is the one. Sony’s colour is nowhere near.
@@maxkitaev3524 Not really. The whole 10-bit thing is very overdramatized by spec warriors.
In reality there is very few people who can take advantage of 10-bit codec. 10-bit is definitely nice thing to have, but nothing is falling apart with Sony. Especially if you use s-gamut3.cine and Cine4.
The Hybrid Shooter i don’t think so. I had GH4 and A7S. I could clearly say that skintone and skies would have cracked into colorful pixels although this doesn’t happens to C200 or Blackmagic footage. So 10bit is not a made up spec.
The fact that Fuji can even hold its own against one of the best FF sensors ever created says a lot. Good review.
I have a Sony A7 System (A7rii & A7iii) and a Fuji System (GFX 50S medium format). Both are highly capable systems and you can’t go wrong with either. On paper (and in your mind), the Sony usually pulls ahead and is a great all-purpose tool. The Fuji (X and GFX) systems are incredibly capable and subjectively much more enjoyable to use due to the manual dedicated buttons and dials - in particular, if you are a street shooter, you can quickly change shutter/aperture/ISO settings *before* you even turn on the camera. I picked the Sony because I have a large number of Leica lenses that I adore and after several successful projects/books/exhibitions, I’m now superstitiously attached to. If it wasn’t for that, and if I was starting over again, I would pick the Fuji X system. When I recommend cameras to friends, I usually recommend the Fuji X system.
I was deciding between Sony A7iii and Fuji XT4 and went with Fuji due to the better design and smaller kit size. I am attracted to the Sony lens ecosystem, and am waiting for the A7iv to get into it. Excellent video.
Thank you!
The E-mount is reaching the end of its potensial, while the R-mount is future proof.
@@bioliv1 That's a total myth spread by competitors. They have 24mm F1.4 extremely sharp from corner to corner and the best 12-24mm F2.8 on the market. That is a proof that E-mount is not limiting in any way.
Just the opposite, it enables them to make very compact lenses and have APS-C system without awkwardly large mount like Z50.
@@TheHybridShooter The RF-mount has 12 new contacts, so that it can transfer mora data than the fewer and older contacts on the e-mount. And maybe the larger Z-mount can make sharper lenser cheaper at fast apertures? The new 12-24 G-master is very expensive.
@@bioliv1 Number of contacts doesn't matter at all. E-mount lenses can transfer all that needs to be transferred. It is just metadata, you don't need thunderbolt connection for that.
As I have said, 24mm F1.4 is as challenging to make as it gets and it is perfect, so no.
The first time I watched this I was in the Fujifilm camp. The 3rd or 4th time I watched I realized the A7iii is just so damn good.
Lmao. I literally just watched it for the 4th. It's torture trying to choose
@@batdroid2705 Dude same here, I can't decide aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Jokutso Canon Eos R6?
@ZAI Lovesyou In your dreams .... before you press the shutter button in Z6 I will have already done 150 pictures on my SD card ready to post in jpges :))
Can't go wrong with either or just get both :)
This is a fantastic overview. Thanks for putting it together. I think people will find it really useful.
Thank you!
If Sigma and Tamron start adapting lenses for Fuji then we'll have a real battle. I've been eyeing the A7iii for a long time but that damn Fuji is just so sexy!
That is very unlikely.
@@TheHybridShooter unlikely? One year later... 😄
thank you, very good comparison!
I would be very interested in a detailed image quality comparison between APS-C and Full Frame (Tamron 28-75 vs Fuji 16-80 or 18-55) to see how much is the difference there.
I recently moved to Fuji and every day I like the system a bit more. The menu is much better than many people say in my opinion (coming from Nikon).
Would you recommend the 16-80 lens for allround landscape photography? (16-55 is too heavy for me)
Thank you! 16-80mm is a good compromise between the image quality, aperture and the size. Optical qualities are good considering the zoom range.
I have 10-24, 16-80 and 100-400. The 16-80 has very good IQ, OIS and versitility.
I wouldn’t say very good, optical qualities are adequate for that size and focal range.
@@TheHybridShooter photography is subjective and personally I had that opinion. However since changing to Capture One, the raw conversion definitely brings out what the lens is capable of. The IQ in most lenses are only noticeable at pixel peeping levels.
@James Borley Not really, sharpness is perfectly measurable, there is nothing subjective about that. There are no issues with RAW processing in the latest versions of LR. The corners are just too soft to call the optical qualities very good. It still a good promise between optical qualities and versatility.
Now this is how you do a comparison/review!
Thank you!
Great video. Personally, I sold my Sony A7iii, and bought the Fuji x-t3, now I own the Fuji X-t4. I am super happy making the switch. Basically I feel the Fujis are more 'fun' to shoot with, and find my self using the Fuji a lot more than with my previous Sonys. And I guess that's why we own cameras.
What makes you more happy to use worse camera?
@@pavelvitek766 I am not sure if I understand what is a "worse camera".
Anders Bråthen well most of the filmmakers would agree that a7 iii is more of a professional camera.. What made you switch to a worse camera? (Considered by the majority)
@@pavelvitek766 OK. I don't see it that way ;-) Too me full frame has only 2 advantages, shooting wide angle, somewhat better results in low light. Other than that, I see only benefits with the the non full frame Fuji X-T4. There is a strong tendency among the "majority" to overrate the importance of "full frame". Either way, both of these cameras are in the same "range" and both will provide excellent results. Your professionalism will not be impacted in any way based on which one of these two cameras you own. The Fuji provides me with a wider range of use, which make me do "more", and being able to earn more because of that.
Anders Bråthen great 🙂 But lowlight capability is different level. Same with autofocus. That would win that for me
I saw some photos from Vietnam. Hope you had a great trip to my country! Excellent comparison.
Thank you! Yes, I definitely did.
makes me want a a7III so bad. But I want that 4k60 and 10 bit in video.
cweb1988 I own Sony a7iii but the only issue I have with this camera is the color .i préfère canon color
yeah, because of 4k 60p i will probably go XT4 i guess !!! Soon XD
so, that can make Slow motion right? filmming 4k 60p and play back like 24p or 30p.
I am still researching for getting my Bad ass Camera
@Fourie Krause I'm actually considering Sony for how excellent the very cost effective Tamron 2.8 options are... even the Tammy variable 28-200 starts at 2.8. Ibis on the X-T4 is far better though.
Thanks a lot for this video! I've watched it at least 3 times. I mainly want to use the camera for photography, especially landscape. I also want to take it on vacation with me. I'm deciding between Fuji XT4 with 18-55 2.8 and Sony a7iii with Tamron 28-75 2.8. I won't need a lot more lenses for what I do. It's important for me that the camera makes good photos in many conditions and that I don't have a problem with the weather (e.g. overheating). If it's okay to ask, which would be your favourite for me? Picture quality seems to be better with the Sony. The Fuji's lens (total package with the body) is shorter/friendlier for on the go? Greetings
What did you end up choosing?
what did you end up choosing? and are you happy with your choice?
Highly underrated video, and highly informative and usefull. Keep it up with a great work!
Thank you, will do my best to keep it up!
I’m Fuji (X-T20) user, I really love Fuji with friendly users settings. But, Sony A7 iii is fckn awesome. This video really made me confuse, should I upgrade to X-T4 or try a new one Sony A7 iii.
what did you choose
they both seem equally good...fullframe depth of field with better auto focus or 10bit 4k60 with APS-C fully articulated screen.
As mostly street photographer, and after having Canon, Sony and Fuji I just ordered the X-T4. What I must love of it is the fuji jpegs you are able to create and all the film simulations that you can easily tweak to reduce a lot the workflow. The only thing i hate of x-t4 is that horrible screen i prefer the two axis screen than the flip screens.
you could always sell the x-t4 and get a used x-t3 or even x-t2
@@Amperland yeah but they do not have ibis, they have smaller battery, no classic negative. I love everything in the X-T4 but not the screen.
Hey, what about low light ?
For example, low light conditions in cities, does the XT4 perform well ?
ty :)
Love it! I hate how Fuji keeps making their X-T cameras larger and heavier (and more expensive?), so it's only right to compare it to the Sony. X-T4 at the start of its product cycle and A7III at the end of its cycle, yet still a close battle.
Considering that X-T4 has very effective IBIS and high video specs, I think that the size is reasonable.
@@TheHybridShooter absolutely, and they've always got the X-T30 line for the more compact option (I've got an X-T20). It'll be interesting to see what they do with the X-T40 since a new sensor and Ibis are probably not on the cards.
@@TheHybridShooter hello sir which should i buy for wedding filmaking
XT-4 A7iv or the Canon r6
i have ef lens but i have one Fujifilm 35mm f2 lens too
pls recommend me the best
Thanks
I find your reviews are pretty thorough and cover all the bases. . I felt the A7 iii is a better choice for stills and the XT4 if your first choice is videos.
Thank you! It still depends on what kind of stills and video are you shooting and your preferences.
I’ve been waiting for this! As always great review!
Thank you!
It's an elaborate evaluation.excellent review. I am planning to go for XT4. What's your advise for choosing the lens as the kit lens? I get normally 18-55mm f2.8. but what's your advise for general around photography and video? Which lens to take.please advise.
A huge fan of this channel. I love how you like tilt screens over flip out. Tilts are way better, unfortunably youtubers have a big effect on camera manufactures and flip outs are going to conquer :C
Thank you! Unfortunately, all manufacturers caved in after the pressure from vocal vlogging audience, but it is not a dealbreaker for me.
Congratulations on a well balanced and informative review. I moved to the A7iii from the Nikon D500 because I wanted full frame. Image resolution is better but it's taking me a while to get used to the menu system which is way too clunky. The D500 was much more straight forward. I would very much like to see your recommendation for how best to set up the Sony with the latest 3.10 firmware update. I mainly shoot landscapes, portraits, pets and street photos. The ability to lock Tracking Eye AF for Humans and Animals is something I would really like to see.
XT4 does not stand opposite Nikon D 500 in any manner ,I have both ..
Had the XT3 for long time,great video camera,great codecs and 4K 60P but... I sold it and I bought 2 A7iii and boy... I know that is only 8bit codec and cannot do 4K60 but Full Frame uncropped 25P is the king... The image you get from the Sony sensor is insane...Not saying that the XT3/XT4 are not capable cameras but full frame video is awesome. Huge difference at least in my eyes
Did you compare with equivalent lenses?
great review! I really enjoy the way you present information, very objective and honest, incredible work, keep going! Photography community can really benefit from your videos, and it feels just awesome that your way of presenting information is as objective as possible, which basically makes the community more conscious and less susceptible to marketing trends or influencers. You respect the community by doing so, and I personally respect you, great stuff!
Thank you, I appreciate your positive feedback!
Yet another thoughtful, even handed comparison. Thanks so much for the effort you put into your reviews. Would it make sense, now, to compare the xt4 with the g9? If that is not in your immediate plans, would you comment on that now? Thanks for all your videos.
Thank you! I don't have G9 anymore, but I will compare X-T4 and GH5.
The Hybrid Shooter That would be super. Thanks. Would you be willing to say whether the xt4 is a significant improvement over the g9 for photos?
Yes, it is.
The Hybrid Shooter Thank you kindly and keep producing those great analyses.
I changed my nikon d750 for xt4 , no regrets at all. Fuji feels so good in hands and pictures are awesome. Full frame have some advantages but minor , prefer better handling and light weight . And that vintage looks 😍
Great video! One correction I'd like to make is at 15:00 you say Fuji has no f2.8 24-70mm equivalent zooms. I believe the red badge XF16-55 f2.8 is exactly that. It's more like a 24-82.5mm equivalent thanks to the cropped sensor, effectively providing a little more reach.
Thank you! That 16-55mm F2.8 is F4.2 FF equivalent, so there is nothing to correct there.
@@TheHybridShooter Understood! Thank you very much for the explanation. Would that make the F2 Fuji primes the equivalent of a 35mm F3?
Wonderful content. Do you have a preferred AF setting for the XT-4? Have you encountered constant pulsating focus issues while using AF? Thank you!
I have had some issues with older lenses, new lenses are fine as you can see in the video. I use default AF settings most of the time.
@@TheHybridShooter Thank you for the response. Last question. Have you encountered any overheating issues while shooting video with the XT4?
Just give up af on fujifilm xt, all models. it sucks and there's nothing u can do about it. not even the new one that came out in 2022
Not true
@@TheHybridShooter whats your trick then? I've had the xt4 since release and I can't figure out a way for af not to hunt
Maybe you can help me?? I mainly shoot car videos, think car shows and drag racing. Sometimes at night under the nights of the track.. Been trying to find a new camera setup what would you recommend as far as XT4 vs A7iii?
A7 III would be more suitable for that.
I currently own an A7iii, but I am considering moving down to an X-T4 due to it being smaller, and its more creative workflow (film simulation, double exposure, dials and film camera form factor.) though, i am planning to grow with either Sony or Fuji as i buy more lenses and hope to someday work as a full time photographer. I plan to shoot portraits, events, landscapes, Astro, macro, product photography, basically everything. I want to shoot as an enthusiast, as well as a professional with my camera. Is the X-T4s smaller size and retro feel worth sacrificing the superior AF, DR, and ISO performance that Sony has, and may continue to build in the future? Can Fuji offer enough as a working photography camera for all listed scenarios with the lenses they offer now/the sensor size itself? Or will it suffer in many of the categories listed that i will be shooting due to APSC, therefor I should keep my FF A7iii and admire the Fuji from a distance.. knowing it may not be everything I need for work.
I know there’s less bokeh on APS-C, and more grain in low light, I know that moving down to an APSC will only gain me benefits ergonomically, not photographically. Just want some insight from either you, or the community. Thanks in advance, everyone!
Those are very complex and philosophical questions, so I am afraid that the answer to all of them is that it depends on your preferences, specific use case and what is sufficient quality of output for you...
X-T4 isn't any smaller though, equivalent lenses are also roughly the same size.
Your Sony A7III is an amazing camera. However, it can be great to try out other systems. It's a bit like dipping your toes into Mac vs PC, except with cameras you have quite a few more options. The Fuji is a ton of fun to shoot with, especially if you are just rattling off JPEGs with the odd RAW photo thrown in when you know you might need it. If you are considering Fuji, for portrait consider the 50mm F2, the new 50mm F1 (!), KamLan 50mm F1.1 II, Rokinon 12mm F2 (for astro), or the Fujifilm 10-24mm. The older Fujifilm X-H1 and X-T3 should be considerations as there sensors are just a smidge behind the X-T4, and they can be purchased cheap. Even X-T2 is very good. Perhaps you maybe be able to keep both systems? Build a small Fuji kit with older body, a couple lens. Or just buy an older Fujifilm X100F, X100T, X70, XF10 to have a second body that is all-in-one. very slim, and that you use for fun.
Great review and a very anticipated one, A7iii it is for me! Thank you, looking forward to more! :)
Thank you!
Can u make comparison between xt4 vs gh5?
Excellent content btw 👍
Thank you! Yes, I will do that soon.
@@TheHybridShooter great, thank you 😍
i own the gh5 it is a great video camera but the stills are not up to par with a xt4.
@@urbanrunoff awesome, thank you 🙂
@@urbanrunoff not at all
. Fuji photo is near to Sony full frame quality. Gh5 stills are mostly only good in professional use... Great lights/studio etc... I have seen .. Gh5 can be professional photography camera.. but I would say pricing for the photos should be lower for costumers.
I subscribed a while ago to your awesome channel. Reading your honest straight-to-the-point answers in the comments here just turned me into a lifetime subscriber. Keep doing what you do
Thank you, I appreciate it!
The analog dials and better handling of most Fuji cameras just make me want to use them more. At the end of the day, that’s what really matters.
It isn't better or worse, it is not suitable for all types of use, which is why the new X-H2S has conventional controls with PSAM dials. A lot of things matter at the end of the day, handling is just one of them.
@@TheHybridShooter my point is that if I don’t enjoy using my camera, the other features don’t matter as much. The handling of Fujis personally makes me excited to use them. Of course everyone has different preferences though.
I made this exact switch from a7iii to Fuji x-t4 and if you can have both then do it but the x-t4 offers an overall better user experience. I miss my a7iii but I feel more involved in the creation of my photos with fuji
Dying for an XH2 already. I think the ergonomics will be much better.
thanks for this video I'm quite happy with the Sony A7III and Panasonic G9 combo 👌🏼
You're welcome, thank you for watching!
I have gh5 and a7iii combo... Both 2 lenses.. two one prime and one zoom In both.... I feel like I have everything I need... Alll these coming new cameras are pixel picking.. don't need a damn new camera for at least 5-7 years .. I put money instead lights and audio..
@@ariruishalme4403 what lenses do you have for a7iii and gh5 plz
@@dimdimich1 a7iii zoom tamron 28-75mm 2.8 + prime samyang 18mm gh5 I have Lumix 25mm 1.7 and zoom Leica 12-60mm 2.8-4.0
@@ariruishalme4403 thank you for quick reply, have the same lenses with my GH5 plus 45mm 1.8 oly, at mom thinking of getting a7iii tamron combo and prime or two also and its encouraging to hear from happy users of such combos regards
Hardware aside, I believe Fuji wins out on software by a long shot. More aspect ratio options, focus stack options, timers(long exposures) that are customizable, film simulations (for travel pics) etc etc. It just feels well rounded and a smarter camera overall. As a a7iii user I wish Sony would improve the software features.
PS: A suggestion/request. I think it would be valuable if you can compare things like this also as very few reviews go into the software features like these.
I have talked about film simulations, but Sony also has picture profiles, which as great. Other than that I haven't really found software features important enough to talk about in 15min. compatison.
Yes. Film simulations you talked about. Was just encompassing everything I could recollect. Fuji also lets us configure custom long exposure values beyond the typical 30 secs and bulb which I find great. Also, focus bracketing and 4:5,1:1 aspect ratios are great for food and product photography. Being a software engineer I believe some(not all) of these are very easy to implement but somehow Sony doesn't.
I understand if you couldn't fit into 15 mins timeline. Maybe an idea for a separate video outlining such features in different competing cameras 😉
On the other hand, Fuji is missing touch tracking and custom area settings in video. Neither is great when it comes to software, Panasonic is still best in that area.
Aah. Didn't know about that. Not a video shooter. I tried stills with my friend's xt3. No idea about Panasonic either. Panasonic doesn't have much presence in India. It's all Canon, Sony and Nikon and Fuji to a lesser extent.
Thanks for the video, it was the comparison I was looking for.
Hey i have a question I’m trying to get for the very first cámara don’t know which one to get Sony a7iii or fuji xt4 there both in the same Price range but the sony is Not older which one would you recommend me to start with
Well, that is what this video is about, so I can't tell you much more...
I love my a7iii. Looking for a second camera but a7c hasn’t convinced me 100%. Would having these cameras make a great pair for paid hybrid shoots? The a7iii to focus more on photos and the Fuji for video or should I get the a7c? Please any advice would be much appreciated!
Is the 7c like an improved video version of the 7iii?
No, it is more compact alternative to A7C.
@@TheHybridShooter thank you my friend! I will keep thinking about it!
Wow great video, if you will choose between A7c with sigma 24-70 2.8 art lens and Fufifilm xt4 with 16-55mm 2.8 WR lens, what will you choose? And why? Thanks a lot🙂
Thank you! My requirements are rather specific, so my personal choices are not very relevant. This video and A7C vs A7 III compassion should help you decide - th-cam.com/video/UXVpfRbKhOQ/w-d-xo.html
Best comparsion ever. All my questions have answered.
Thank you!
Do you think that micro fourth thirds will die? (I am searching a new camera and m4/3 Is an option)
Yes, looking at the latest releases from both Olympus and Panasonic, I don't think that M43 is a perspective system.
@@TheHybridShooter Thanks for the answer. I think the same, the M4/3 have no future. You can have very portable pocketeable APSC sensor cameras that can have much better image quality than a M4/3. I think for the future even the APSC market will shrink, when the cheap full frame mirrorless take the market. There will be sub $500 full frame mirrorless in the future, and the APSC will have no way to compete.
Fuji APS-C is now basically the new M43, in a good way. Downfall of M43 is mostly a fault of Oympus and Panasonic, as they failed to innovate the system. If Fuji and Sony will be more committed to APS-C, it can be around for a long time as an alternative to FF with better feature set at given price.
@@TheHybridShooter True. I think Panasonic & Olympus hit the resolution brick wall when they put 20MP sensors in their cameras. I think Panasonic saw the decline coming & that's why they invested in FF which is what seems to be on-trend at the moment. I don't see a bright future for Olympus though sadly, they should have jumped into the L-Mount Alliance with Panasonic/Sigma/Leica & the EM1-X could/should have been a FF mirrorless beast!
@Steve Ferneyhough They didn't just see the decline, they caused it by the lack of innovation. It is not something that just happened to them. There should have been GH6 with new BSI sensor and 5.3K RAW recording released in December 2019 alongside 25-62.5mm F1.7. That would have definitely prevented the decline and outsell the whole Lumix S line.
I know this is off topic but I do have a Sony a7iii and love it. I'm looking to add a second small/travel camera. Some vlogging, walking tours when travel, home tours for real estate, b-roll footage - good image quality. Go Pro 8, Osmo Pocket, Insta360 One R 1-inch? Hope to hear your recommendation!
My favorite action cameras are Insta360 One R and Osmo Pocket at the moment. 1-mod has the best image quality, but the minimal focus distance is about 80cm, so it is not suitable for vlogging.
@@TheHybridShooter Thanks! I decided on the 1 inch mod. Great videos!
Thanks for great video and information! What program do you use for editing?
You're welcome! I use Premiere Pro but I don't recommend it.
@@TheHybridShooter thanks for quick response. What would you recommend for beginners?
@@arturmukhamed-aliev9141 If you use Mac, I recommend Final Cut, if not, I unfortunately don't know.
@@TheHybridShooter mac! THANK You!
Perfect comparison! Thank you!
You're welcome, thank you for watching!
Which of this camera would you recommend if I want to make a feature film ??
🤣😂🤣
So many great options out there ... One thing everyone must consider is how much it will cost you to upgrade your computer to edit the video from these great cameras at their highest bitrates etc.
Basically any mid-end computer can edit 4K from X-T4, so that is not a big issue.
I’m using xt3 and really want ibis since I love the look of slower shutter speeds even for street since it gives a cool look that I enjoy and now I’m stuck deciding between the xh1, xt4 or a7iii since these are the most I can afford. The good thing is that I could just live with a 2.8 zoom and maybe the 85 1.8 on Sony and I’d be happy but 2.8 on apsc leaves me with a bit to be desired … meaning I’d need to go for the sigma 1.4 primes which are like f2.1 on ff making it a rough decision. I don’t find myself being in love with my camera like some other people say they are so I’m open to potentially changing systems or just bodies, however this may be due to the fact that I currently only have the 18-55 though
For TH-camrs who shoot their own videos, which one would be a good choice? I am little worried as the sony ariii doesn't have a complete flipscreen. It's difficult to shoot without seeing urself
Both are good choices. I don't film myself, so I don't know how important is the front screen for that.
Hello i am fuji x-t200 user.
I want to buy x-t4 or sony a7m3.
I prefer clear pic and video resolution.
Just for take a pic for my cat and tour, shoting star and so on...
Can u recommend which one is better one?
And crop over by using x-t4at the picture, still resolution is good? If then i want to buy x-t4
That is what this video is about, so I can't tell you much more that what I said in the video.
If you could only have one camera which would you pick for hybrid shooting? A7iii, a7c or xt4?
I'm sorry, but I prefer not to answer this kind of questions. I am camera reviewer, so I have very specific requirements, which are not very relevant to most users.
@@TheHybridShooter yeah an opinion would help but I understand where you are coming from. I have an a7iii and bought and a7c but I can’t shake the wanting to try an xt4!
I currently own the A7iii but would really like a camera with 4k 60p. The X-T4 was really tempting to me for it's video specs but wondered if I should wait to see what the A7S III offers. What are your thoughts?
I have no idea, I have no internal information on A7S III, so I will have to wait to see what it really is.
@@TheHybridShooter Thanks for the reply. I was going based on the rumoured specs but I guess they could be wildly different when announced. Thanks anyway 😁
I don't trust those rumors too much to be honest. A9 II rumors were 100% wrong as well.
@@Dazarazmataz The A7siii is great but not really a great hybrid camera. Video its awesome but with a price tag of £3800 i dont think its a perfect choice if you do photography. I would wait till end of year i think we will see the A7iv land with super hybrid specs! Im looking to get a XT4 for video at the moment for the quality over A7iii :) Happy shooting
@@IanSnape Yeah the A7S III is more expensive than I expected it would be. The X-T4 is really tempting but have a feeling I will miss full frame, the A7IIIs 8 bit codec and low bitrate is a huge downside so I might have to see what the A7IV offers 😁
The Sony costs 22 944,- N.Kr. here, which in notes equals 2622.50 USD, so it's quite much above $2000.
Well, that is probably a side-effect of Norwegian 5-year warranty, taxes and currency depreciation.
Your reviews are great! Always great comparisons with a lot of really useful information!
Thank you!
I came from the Sony a7 and a6000 and now I use the XT4 exclusively to start my TH-cam channel. The flip screen is a must for vlogs. The XT4 is just...fun to use. It makes me want to pick it up and play with it. The ergonomics are much better and the film simulations are great for video.
Full frame will always have an edge, but if you're not always shooting in low light situations, it won't affect affect your creativity. At the end of the day, both cameras are top of the line and you can't go wrong with either.
Great comparison!
Thank you! A7 and A6000 are very old cameras, newer Sony cameras offer completely different experience.
@@TheHybridShooter another thing to consider is full frame glass and apsc glass. It's not just the budget of the camera body as those come and go, but glass stays for a long time. The Fuji XF glasses are very nice. Metal, feels solid and sharp. To get something similar with the a7 series, you'll need to increase your budget.
I used to struggle with the full frame vs apsc, but now I just shoot with whatever body that makes me take my camera out more :)
@Matt Lau No. You can get compact and optically excellent 3rd party lenses for E-mount such as Samyang F1.8 primes or Tamron zooms. Those are always cheaper than Fuji counterparts and they easily outperform X-mount lenses, thanks to lower pixel density on FF sensor. E-mount is definitely more budget friendly system than Fuji XF.
hi, really good idea to compare the ISO performance between the 2 cameras, thanks ! :)
New to youtube?
All i want is the perfect camera :-)
Fuji needs better autofocus and faster lenses/third party lenses. It would be the best camera. I'm on the X-T3 and suffer from these issues too.
What editing software are you using ? Would you recommend it over Lightroom ? 3:10
Luminar 4.3 - bit.ly/Luminar4THS
I use it together with Lightroom as a plug-in.
After 3 years still awesome comparison work u have done while helping a lot 🎉
Thank you! I’m glad that it is still helpful.
@@TheHybridShooter thank you a lot, regards from Germany ⚽♥️
I have Canon EF-S lenses, can I use them on XT-4 with adapter to shoot video? Will it work?
It is possible, but I haven’t tested it myself.
Yes, get an autofocus adapter, I purchased one myself, bit expensive but let’s ya attach any Ef-s lens without an issue
Great vid! I have the a7iii and love it! I’m looking for a second camera and my obvious choice in my budget is an a7c. I like auto focus! But my slow mo on a7iii just seems very soft especially 120. Is Fuji xt4 something I should consider? I’m a hybrid shooter. Shoot weddings and other corporate gigs + YT
1080p video on Sony is not soft, they just use much less sharpening than other manufacturing in default settings. You can adjust that if you prefer higher sharpness.
The Fuji is a great camera, the camera is cheaper and the lenses are cheaper with the same / better lenses
William, I don't think you touched on the LCD screen. Does it swing around for self portraits? I will be 83 when my driver's licence expires early next year, and in the coronavirus lockdown in Victoria I need a good head shot of me to renew my licence online. I am torn between these two cameras, the Panasonic GH5, G9 and S5, and my old GH1.
I really enjoy your videos. They're extremely useful. I wanted to ask you... Do you know of any reasonable priced lenses for the XT-4 if I use it for indoor sports? (Low light, fast moving subjects) thank you!
Unfortunately not. There are no budget options for that.
@@TheHybridShooter what do u think of that lens? Has AF, 85mm apsc lens for fuji, and is 1.8 for $400 USD
I haven't tested that one with Fujifilm. It is quite a risky choice if you need fast autofocus.
@@TheHybridShooter good point. Thanks mate. I'll try to do more research on it
My question is what is it like to shoot all day with these cameras? Maybe even two days in a row? Is one camera better than the other in terms of ergonomics over the long haul. Do your hands hurt at the end of the day after a thousand shots? Secondly, after a year's worth of work, how do the cameras hold up to heavy usage? Do things fall off, do the buttons and dials still work? How do the sensors hold up to dust? Sony has a bad reputation for sensor dust issues for instance. How easy is it to change camera settings in the field, after a long day on location and the perfect shot comes along requiring a major change in settings? Which camera would you lose the shot because of menus and settings complexity, buttons and dials positioning/functions? Have you ever dropped one of these little electronic marvels? What happened if you did? Can you get either one of them repaired where you live or are these just toys to be fondled and worried over all the time? One drop or bump and throw it away? Let us know!! Stay safe!
I usually cover those questions in my long term reviews, those are available for A7 III on the channel. All mirrorless cameras collect the dust the same... I have used a lot of cameras, so I am generally fine with controls on any camera expect for entry-level cameras such as M50, and I don't loose pictures because of the wrong settings. Fortunately, I have never dropped any camera and I have never had any reliability issues.
QuickRelease CLAMP @ 10:10 please: What model and brand is it (if for Arca) ?
I'm much intrigued if it is just as a good solution as the ones by RRS (Many other brands are eighter "clumpsy" or otherwise not as smooth or safe in handling - to my liking.)
Did you have any chance to experience fuji gfx50r medium format camera? Despite the large sensor size and lower technical specs (slower) than most of the full frame cameras, price is very charming. It will be nice to hear your idea. Thank you.
Not yet, but I intend to do so in the future. Based on the specs and lens selection, I would only consider GFX100. I would probably just get one of 40+ MP full frame cameras with IBIS instead of GFX50R.
You said x-t4 can handle a 1 second exposure still image at 18mm no problem. What slowest shutter speed still photo would you say the a7iii’s ibis could handle?
Hello how are you?
I am not a professional photographer. but photography its my passion , I am currently traveling the world on my motorcycle. and I have a Canon M50 apc-s. But I am an action photographer (motorcycle), landscape, and portrait and astrophotography. (I would like to start with wildlife too) after 2 years using my Canon. the truth I feel is slow and for action I don't like it at all. What would you recommend me? I am between the A7III or XT-4 .. for me it would be ideal to be good for everything a little. since with my trip I need everything.
Thank you very much
Regards
Well, that is what this video is about. Both are great all-round cameras, so it depends on your preferences, as explained in the video.
Super video, Ďakujem! Dlhsiu dobu som sa rozhodoval či si mam kupit fujifilm X-T4 (Prestupujem s Canonu) a dospel som k nazoru, ze to bude dobry krok..ešte raz dakujem
Ďakujem pekne, nech teda X-T4 dobre slúži.
What stabilizer or gimbal do you recommend for these?
DJI RS2, DJI RSC 2 or Zhiyun Weebill S.
Thank you very much. So detailed rewiew, and only nessasary info
You're welcome! Thank you for watching!
Can, in stills, the IBIS from Fuji take the advantage away of the bigger sensor from Sony in handheld low light conditions?
No.
Really nice video ! Where did you come in Greece ?
Thank you! I was there in 2019.
A very useful comparison. Thank you.
You're welcome, thank you for watching!
Wich one have better auto focus?
Sony
@@TheHybridShooter one more subscribe, thanks
When shooting video, which one of these cameras match up with your favorite action camera?
The color science is similar enough with both, so both are fine for matching colors. Especially if you use flat setting and color grade.
Hi there, I know this question have been asked million times but I am trying to upgrade my camera for my video business and I would really value your professional and personal advice.
Would you recommend XT4 + 16-55 2.8 OR A7iii + SIGMA 24-70 f2.8?
Requirement:
- 80% of run and gun shooting, Event highlight video, Wedding, Yoga commercial, various B-Roll
- Good IBIS : Dont wanna use Gimbal unless I really need long tracking shot
- Auto focus must be good due to run and gun style Focus change has to be smooth (Some fuji lens sucks as they change focus too rapidly despite the settings in camera, especially for non-native fuji lens)
- Good dynamic range and ideally a bit better in low light setting.
I am concern about the JERKY behavior of the XT4 IBIS as I have seen on other youtube video.
Also that full frame look with the SIGMA 24-70 f2.8 is king on the Sony, not sure if the fuji 16-55 2.8 can do this.
Unfortunately, I can't really tell you much more than what I said in the video. IBIS is not a problem on X-T4 anymore. If you want full frame look, you need a full frame camera, so A7 III might be a better choice for your.
@@TheHybridShooter thanks for your time to answer! it;'s so hard honestly, for real work, the AF is really handy, but the XT4 is more fun and the retro look haha.
Which lens did you use on the A73 for autofocus test?
Probably tamron 28-75
I m looking for new camera.!so,which one I should buy?cause I to took a photo for my kids. I
Well, that it what this video is about...
I still choose the Fuji for stills. In general, the lens ecosystem is cheaper and, as a frequent traveler, I can make my X-T3 small for travel (plus use my X-System lenses with a smaller camera such as the X-T30) or make it big and "pro" for shoots with larger lenses and battery grip. It has some weaknesses compared to some FF systems, but they're easily overcome. The Fuji system serves me better for double duty for personal and pro use. Pixel peeping and small equipment differences also matter way less when you're actually out shooting and not sitting at your computer googling 'Fuji vs Sony'. The constant equipment focus in photography gets old, especially the "why I'm switching to X videos" (the reason: For clicks and views).
Well, that's completely fine, there is no need to justify it with such comments if you are really happy with the system... Fuji lenses are more expensive than full frame counterparts though.
What city do you live in? It's so beautiful.
It is Capital of Slovakia - Bratislava 😊
Thanks for the video. Can you please tell the best two lense for A7iii.
Depends on what you shoot, your budget, preference and so on.
sel24105g
I think the real problem with a73 is the rolling shutter jiggle. It's gross, especially combined with the ibis, and makes the camera unusable for video. The xt4 has outrageous readout speed with no perceivable jiggle. The issues with tricky lighting (sunset) and low light are definitely true negative aspects with Fuji xt4
Definitely not.
Thank you for great Review. I am planning to buy my first mirrorless camera. I have 2 options in my mind, one is Fujifilm XT4 and other one is Sony A7C. what is your opinion.
why not the a7iii?
@@noel4140
the only drawback is , does not have provision to take selfie.
Take a look at my A7 III vs A7C comparison, that and this video contain all of my opinions about this topic. th-cam.com/video/UXVpfRbKhOQ/w-d-xo.html
I'll say only two things. Shallower depth of field & best in class autofocus. Imagine what i bought...
A Nikon?
@@batdroid2705 a7iii 📸
I have an x-t4. It is very good for the body and the optics too. I am very disappointed with this camera solely because I love to take photos against the light, and the fuji does not have the ability of sony to emulate a helper with a function similar to HDR. Is this function really valid in the A7iii for shooting photos against the light? Thankyou
X-T4 has in-camera HDR mode. Advanced users don't use in-camera HDR, so it is not very valid in this kind of camera.
Yes, I don't know if I am an advanced user, I am shure a professionist. When I need This kind of picture, is more interesting to do that in camera to save time and money. You say that HDR mode is in-camera but I don't know where.
I have a7iii but I love the flip screen so I could film videos of myself.
Better to get some kind of monitor or switch ?
@@matttfletcher I think I have seen a review for one of these! Good call!
Wow, the first picture is the pagoda in my hometown, which i had a photo shot last week 😁
14:06 Angkor Cambodia 🥰🥰
Xt4 for cinema, Sony A73 for documentaries.
Which one for wedding and portraiture photography ???
Great reviews and comparison, well done!
Thank you!
Incredible review!! Very useful!! Thank you very much!!!!
Thank you, always my pleasure!